It's 2020 now and this is even SLIGHTLY faster than the R8 v10 Performance (620 hp) i can't believe the 911 turbo s is 580 hp. Even if it's light, i expected it to be 650hp atleast
@@genuinekid6701 And it happened...650 hp in the new 992 Turbo S. If the 991.2 is already lightning-fast, and even the 992 Carrera S is pretty fast for being 'just' a Carrera, I can only imagine how BONKERS the 992 Turbo S must be. This and when you take into account how Porsche underrates their numbers... The 991.1 Turbo S (560 hp) was already capable of 0-60 mph in 2.6 seconds. Porsche claimed 2.9 seconds... The 992 Turbo S is rated at 2.7 seconds in the same sprint, so I wouldn't be surprised if actual numbers were around 2.4...2.5 seconds.
***** thanks! Absolute dream car. Really curious to see how it sounds on a more urban and quiet environment. I've heard it a few times driving by and its properly loud! Not as charismatic as a Ferrari but it's a cool noise in my opinion. Also it's much louder on the inside. Love it! Can't wait. Those night pov really give us a good perspective of how it sounds in real life
Ma è la versione Mk2 cioè quella con 580 cv ? Mi sembra un po' lenta , ho preso il tempo da 1:56 a 2:23 , cioè da 132 a 301 Km/h in 27 secondi , se vedi in rete il filmato della prova di sport auto della Mki quella con 560cv , ci mette 20 secondi ! Io stesso ho provato una 996 Turbo con Kit Rs-Tuning da 540 Cv , ho il filmato e ci ho messo 23 secondi che se si considera il cambio manuale a 6 rapporti contro il pdk a 7 , è un tempo sempre comunque di molto piu basso del tuo. E' molto strano , all'inizio pensavo che la tua prova fosse stata fatta in condizioni estreme , mi sembrava che il termometro indicasse una temp. esterna di 35 gradi , ma non avevo visto la parte in cui salendo in macchina indossi un giubbino e guardando meglio la temperatura durante il tuo test era 3.5 gradi ! L'ideale per la resa di un motore ...Quindi boh ! Ma la strada in cui hai provato era in piano ?
the question should be, who the hell buys this vacuum cleaner shit car? Of course only old fucks. You can only buy a GT3 or GT3RS in the 911 lineup, that's it.
Shivam Kaushal I'm old and flush enough to buy this car, but it had to be said for once. I don't understand how people can throw their money literally out of the window and buy this emotionless car.
You people need to stop comparing a Nissan GT-R to Turbo S. A GT-R is a giant GT car which weighs over 200kg more and has less power and costs half as much as the Turbo S. If Nissan wanted to outperform Turbo S they would do it but that's not their goal. Imagine if it was and a Nissan starts manufacturing GT-R's with 580PS (same as the Turbo S) with just 1600kg net weight and a new 7-speed dual clutch transmission. And now imagine what else would be possible if the price tag was 200k+ EUR. Turbo S is a great car but costs way too much in my opinion.
Well the GT-R is 570ps ... so not far from your 580ps, and 7 speed DCT will only help on fuel economy (911 PDK is geared to top speed in 6'th and 7'th is ~275mph). Also the time when it cost 1/2 is long gone ... GT-R Nismo (600hp) is $175k (10k less than the 991.2 TS) and GT-R track is $130k (2/3 of the 911). So they did produce a GT-R with 600hp ... that still performs worse than the 560hp TS (unless you keep the semi-slick on the Nismo, and street tires on the TS). So if they could drop the weight with 175kg, it would be $200k+ ... and on par (Nismo is low volume, so price goes up, and still inferior interior). How much should the Turbo S cost? (I would like it to be $1 ... but I don't think that's possible). And Porsche do make more money per car than other mfg, so they could lower the price with $10k if they did not want to make money ... but that does not make sense for a company ... to sell stuff cheaper than the market is willing to pay.
goguhu, it's still 200 kg heavier and Turbo S still costs twice as much (even more actually). In Germany a Nissan GT-R without options costs €99,900 and a Turbo S will set you back without options over €205,000. And 570PS compared to 580PS doesn't seem like a big deal but if one car weighs almost 200kg more it becomes a big deal. A Nismo GT-R is a track car and therefore is quicker around a track than a Turbo S. No one said it's quicker of the line but around a track it eats Turbo S for breakfast. A Turbo S is a €150 to 165k car at best. And Nismo's Dunlop maxx gt 600 is not a semi slick tire. It is however a very good dry weather tire.
The Owner Yes the dunlops are Road legal, but they are next to useless on a wet surface (see 1.6L gold diesel beating gtr on a wet lap). When it comes to eating Porsche for breakfast, you have it upside down, 991.2 beat gtr nismo on all tracks they both have set a time on, with the exception of goodwill. Where the 911 set the time in the wet (raining) and the nismo in the dry. The same day the 911 set its time the gtr was 10sec slower on a 60s track ... yes 600hp does not fully compensate for the extra 200kg, and with the worse torque curve the nismo need around 640hp to compete with the turbo. Don't let the internet fanboys trick you to think the gtr is unbeatable. It was a great buy when it came out, but its no longer in the elite. I was taking about cost in US, other countries might have different relative pricing for various reasons. fastestlaps.com/comparisons/7g5sbrl0aojt
goguhu, I actually don't care what fanboys have to say and I agree that those Dunlops are useless on a wet track. I still think these two cars are not in the same class even though they're both specified as sport cars, I think one is a bit more on the sport side than the other. The best comparison for 991.2 Turbo S would be a Huracan, Audi R8 or McLaren 570S. GT-R is just too "big" to compete with any of them in a straight line speed.
I agree, I was just pointing out that the 991.2 Turbo S is actually faster than the GT-R Nismo (and even so with stickier tires) at similar price ($185k vs $175k), while being more compliant as a daily driver.
Quattroruote, tanto per fare un esempio, il 13 Luglio 2016 provava la stessa auto in pista a Variano, mentre tu fregandotene spudoratamente del codice della strada, ti immettevi sulla SS36 Valassina come fosse una pista, a notte inoltrata, o meglio alle 02:00 di notte. Partivi dall'Autolavaggio Villa a Carate Brianza, per poi sfrecciare come uno squilibrato con la Porsche 991 Turbo S, targata FC131MK (ufficiale Porsche Italia in prova per la stampa) a 302 Km/h, superando il limite di ben 192 Km/h. Mi chiedo come la Polizia postale non ti abbia ancora segnalato e ritirato la patente a vita, e Porsche Italia non ti abbia denunciato per uso irresponsabile. Sei un pericolo costante, poiché non è la prima volta che corri come un pazzo, come fosse un circuito, mettendo in pericolo l'incolumità della gente.
91 vs 93 octane is not the real issue, the real issue if they have added E10 to the gas. There is a significant difference on both power and mileage (you get ~32mpg @ 80mph with 91, but it drops to 26-28 if it's E10).
![[4k] EVERYTHING vs 580 HP Porsche 991 Turbo S FACELIFT Mk II](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Etf8loWpjx4/mqdefault.jpg)
turbos is so beautiful!
Porsche always understates their cars' 0-100kmh. Probably horsepower too.
Inner Hammer haha, exactly
It's 2020 now and this is even SLIGHTLY faster than the R8 v10 Performance (620 hp) i can't believe the 911 turbo s is 580 hp. Even if it's light, i expected it to be 650hp atleast
@@genuinekid6701 And it happened...650 hp in the new 992 Turbo S. If the 991.2 is already lightning-fast, and even the 992 Carrera S is pretty fast for being 'just' a Carrera, I can only imagine how BONKERS the 992 Turbo S must be. This and when you take into account how Porsche underrates their numbers...
The 991.1 Turbo S (560 hp) was already capable of 0-60 mph in 2.6 seconds. Porsche claimed 2.9 seconds...
The 992 Turbo S is rated at 2.7 seconds in the same sprint, so I wouldn't be surprised if actual numbers were around 2.4...2.5 seconds.
@@genuinekid6701 aero
@@Roddy_Zeh I wouldn't be surprised if the new turbo s literally lifts off at this point these things drive like rockets
i love this car its brilliant :D
For people using mph:
302 km/h = ~187mph
300 km/h = 186mph
200 km/h = 124mph
100 km/h = 62mph
50 km/h = 31mph
Love my Turbo S. The gentleman's daily supercar.
This porsche 991 turbo S is my dream car 😍
Look at how quick the highway lamps go by at top speed.... crazy
Wow! This thing is a rocket ship! Great driving and great video!
1:01 Bit disappointed there not hearing the dampened thump of an expensive car's door.
you know you're driving a monster when the speedo has 0 .........60...........100.........150
It actually has 0, 50, 100, etc.
And it's been like that since the first 911 came out.
abelucious and keeps pulling till your hairline has been receded
2 gtr fanboys disliked
One of them was your autistic mom
Acting like a tough girl to reply back?
Ed will I’m gtr fan boy and I liked this video because Porsche’s are the 8th wonder of the world lol
@@lastiletto9082 and the other one is your bunde
the road has to be really wet for a 911 turbo to spin tyres
And it only did a 3.5 0-100, whereas it actually does a 2.5 (0-60 mph, maybe 2.6 for 0-100 km/h)
Could be on summer tires and lower temperatures.
it was obviously cold.look at the sleeve of the big red puffy coat.when he first got in the car.
below the clock is the temperature : 4.5 C
stock tires kinda suck. mine spins a little unless im on a really good street surface/warm tires.
wow man, WOOW!
Damn, that's an awesome car!!!
Are you going to post a video of sounds, night driving, day driving (POV'S), etc like with the Boxster and X6M?
Yes, I will upload more videos of this 991 Turbo S in the next few days! ;)
***** thanks! Absolute dream car. Really curious to see how it sounds on a more urban and quiet environment. I've heard it a few times driving by and its properly loud! Not as charismatic as a Ferrari but it's a cool noise in my opinion.
Also it's much louder on the inside. Love it! Can't wait. Those night pov really give us a good perspective of how it sounds in real life
Great video!
I watch this video at least once everyday.
It hurts me that it's half a million dollars in Australia 💔
apmbus it’s 200k here
thanks for posting!!
Thank you for watching!
Bombastic
È quella che ha in prova Galeazzi?
you did that on italian roads? just curious...
You couldn’t accelerate faster if you fell off a cliff
Launch Control in this car breaks your neck :D
the car to end all arguments xD
Amazing
Ma è la versione Mk2 cioè quella con 580 cv ? Mi sembra un po' lenta , ho preso il tempo da 1:56 a 2:23 , cioè da 132 a 301 Km/h in 27 secondi , se vedi in rete il filmato della prova di sport auto della Mki quella con 560cv , ci mette 20 secondi ! Io stesso ho provato una 996 Turbo con Kit Rs-Tuning da 540 Cv , ho il filmato e ci ho messo 23 secondi che se si considera il cambio manuale a 6 rapporti contro il pdk a 7 , è un tempo sempre comunque di molto piu basso del tuo.
E' molto strano , all'inizio pensavo che la tua prova fosse stata fatta in condizioni estreme , mi sembrava che il termometro indicasse una temp. esterna di 35 gradi , ma non avevo visto la parte in cui salendo in macchina indossi un giubbino e guardando meglio la temperatura durante il tuo test era 3.5 gradi ! L'ideale per la resa di un motore ...Quindi boh !
Ma la strada in cui hai provato era in piano ?
Dream car 😍
Dls singer 911 is the car they need to bring back
Looks like the speedo couldn't keep up, went from 60 to 55 km/h 😅
Tire spin?
ahahhahaha
filmed on a "closed course"
Vicious!
in quale strada sei riuscito a tirarla??
How did you not get revlimited when reving while standing still?
mine won't shift unless its redline , I guess that normal for sport plus mode.
Skip the reason why you clicked:...... 1:39
Why doesn't it have a soft limiter
🚀🚀🚀
The car also have straight cut gears?
Iara Isabel Rodrigues no it uses a pdk
incroyable
2.7 sec ?
Dan D 3.3
Porsche Turbo S or Nissan Gtr?
Dexgeta. Porsche, by far, gtr is old news now
Gtr is poor mans porsche
No it’s the other way round.
Porsche
301
what is that whistling sound at 1.53...?
straight cut gears on PDK transmission (It have this from the factory)
1:39
WTF 0-250 in 16 secs
It takes 19 secs
The sound of wind is too noisy 😖😖
Sublim
Yes we know porsches 911, whe know the key , the pdls option and that your car is silver but , go to the point numbers!
Minchia come tira 👍👍👍😊
occhio che sulla Valassina ormai c'è il limite a 50 km/h :-)
Who the fuck buys a 911 without sportsexhaust?
911 turbos dont come with sport exhaust. not available as an option either
the question should be, who the hell buys this vacuum cleaner shit car? Of course only old fucks. You can only buy a GT3 or GT3RS in the 911 lineup, that's it.
Philipp K LMAO
Philipp K how old are you 😂😂
Shivam Kaushal
I'm old and flush enough to buy this car, but it had to be said for once. I don't understand how people can throw their money literally out of the window and buy this emotionless car.
weeeee
No non ci siamo troppi comandi e un suono deludente! Disegno ogni scarafone è bella a mamma sua😜
Bom
6 f1 drivers disliked
holey shit is that fast
stock no tuned
i love natural asp. porsches
ferw swer :D
You people need to stop comparing a Nissan GT-R to Turbo S. A GT-R is a giant GT car which weighs over 200kg more and has less power and costs half as much as the Turbo S. If Nissan wanted to outperform Turbo S they would do it but that's not their goal.
Imagine if it was and a Nissan starts manufacturing GT-R's with 580PS (same as the Turbo S) with just 1600kg net weight and a new 7-speed dual clutch transmission. And now imagine what else would be possible if the price tag was 200k+ EUR.
Turbo S is a great car but costs way too much in my opinion.
Well the GT-R is 570ps ... so not far from your 580ps, and 7 speed DCT will only help on fuel economy (911 PDK is geared to top speed in 6'th and 7'th is ~275mph).
Also the time when it cost 1/2 is long gone ... GT-R Nismo (600hp) is $175k (10k less than the 991.2 TS) and GT-R track is $130k (2/3 of the 911).
So they did produce a GT-R with 600hp ... that still performs worse than the 560hp TS (unless you keep the semi-slick on the Nismo, and street tires on the TS). So if they could drop the weight with 175kg, it would be $200k+ ... and on par (Nismo is low volume, so price goes up, and still inferior interior).
How much should the Turbo S cost? (I would like it to be $1 ... but I don't think that's possible). And Porsche do make more money per car than other mfg, so they could lower the price with $10k if they did not want to make money ... but that does not make sense for a company ... to sell stuff cheaper than the market is willing to pay.
goguhu, it's still 200 kg heavier and Turbo S still costs twice as much (even more actually). In Germany a Nissan GT-R without options costs €99,900 and a Turbo S will set you back without options over €205,000.
And 570PS compared to 580PS doesn't seem like a big deal but if one car weighs almost 200kg more it becomes a big deal.
A Nismo GT-R is a track car and therefore is quicker around a track than a Turbo S. No one said it's quicker of the line but around a track it eats Turbo S for breakfast.
A Turbo S is a €150 to 165k car at best.
And Nismo's Dunlop maxx gt 600 is not a semi slick tire. It is however a very good dry weather tire.
The Owner Yes the dunlops are Road legal, but they are next to useless on a wet surface (see 1.6L gold diesel beating gtr on a wet lap). When it comes to eating Porsche for breakfast, you have it upside down, 991.2 beat gtr nismo on all tracks they both have set a time on, with the exception of goodwill. Where the 911 set the time in the wet (raining) and the nismo in the dry. The same day the 911 set its time the gtr was 10sec slower on a 60s track ... yes 600hp does not fully compensate for the extra 200kg, and with the worse torque curve the nismo need around 640hp to compete with the turbo. Don't let the internet fanboys trick you to think the gtr is unbeatable. It was a great buy when it came out, but its no longer in the elite. I was taking about cost in US, other countries might have different relative pricing for various reasons.
fastestlaps.com/comparisons/7g5sbrl0aojt
goguhu, I actually don't care what fanboys have to say and I agree that those Dunlops are useless on a wet track. I still think these two cars are not in the same class even though they're both specified as sport cars, I think one is a bit more on the sport side than the other.
The best comparison for 991.2 Turbo S would be a Huracan, Audi R8 or McLaren 570S. GT-R is just too "big" to compete with any of them in a straight line speed.
I agree, I was just pointing out that the 991.2 Turbo S is actually faster than the GT-R Nismo (and even so with stickier tires) at similar price ($185k vs $175k), while being more compliant as a daily driver.
You are way above sea level, otherwise the car should go faster.
CEO of revving a cold engine
up 300 likes! 210 i
bad launch
This was done on a PC simulation with speaker volume turned up.
Quattroruote, tanto per fare un esempio, il 13 Luglio 2016 provava la stessa auto in pista a Variano, mentre tu fregandotene spudoratamente del codice della strada, ti immettevi sulla SS36 Valassina come fosse una pista, a notte inoltrata, o meglio alle 02:00 di notte.
Partivi dall'Autolavaggio Villa a Carate Brianza, per poi sfrecciare come uno squilibrato con la Porsche 991 Turbo S, targata FC131MK (ufficiale Porsche Italia in prova per la stampa) a 302 Km/h, superando il limite di ben 192 Km/h. Mi chiedo come la Polizia postale non ti abbia ancora segnalato e ritirato la patente a vita, e Porsche Italia non ti abbia denunciato per uso irresponsabile. Sei un pericolo costante, poiché non è la prima volta che corri come un pazzo, come fosse un circuito, mettendo in pericolo l'incolumità della gente.
F launch control its for newbies i want all power full blown no limiting shit
didn't use premium fuel? much slower than the car magazines' records
Because it's not a smooth launch...in the 1st gear ESC was triggered...
but the acceleration after launch is slower than the magazines too.
91 vs 93 octane is not the real issue, the real issue if they have added E10 to the gas. There is a significant difference on both power and mileage (you get ~32mpg @ 80mph with 91, but it drops to 26-28 if it's E10).
91 or 93? Thought the standard i Europe was 95, might be wrong though.
loppar3 that's true, but its a different rating system, so they can't be compared directly.
Ehhh V Max is 330 😏
autamatic lamer!
This car is slower than 2017e63amgs
조희팔 nope.....not at all my friend