Point Biserial Correlation - SPSS

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 47

  • @traceyshi33
    @traceyshi33 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you for showing us how to interpret the correlation. My teacher did not show us, and I was confused about how to interpret the correlation of two different levels of data. Your explanation was very helpful!

  • @how2stats
    @how2stats  12 років тому +3

    Yep, Pearson' r is mathematically equivalent to the formal point-biserial correlation. Go into google books and type 'point biserial correlation Pearson correlation' and you should plenty of references.
    Phi in the 2x2 Pearson chi-square case is also mathematically equivalent to Pearson's r.

  • @philvlachou4814
    @philvlachou4814 4 роки тому

    this man was my lecturer at uni, nice man

  • @how2stats
    @how2stats  13 років тому +3

    You just use the regular Pearson correlation on the relevant variables.

  • @ronn9706
    @ronn9706 7 років тому

    Best stats channel, hands down.

  • @KarencitaRivera
    @KarencitaRivera 11 років тому

    Thank you for help, I was so confused on how to calculate my data but you made it so easy!

  • @ZeroSugar_orLess
    @ZeroSugar_orLess 8 років тому

    In the video, both variables are key in as an interval scale.

    • @YesItsNay
      @YesItsNay 8 років тому

      Is that what you have to do?

  • @ratchaneewanwongprachan7045
    @ratchaneewanwongprachan7045 4 роки тому

    Thank you so much for your presentation. I understand this technique clearly.

  • @herensn
    @herensn 13 років тому

    It's a useful video, i was wondering how can i calculate point-biserial correlation coffecient in SPSS, thank you..

  • @vladimirmisin1876
    @vladimirmisin1876 7 років тому +1

    How would you interpret a positive ? higher numbers of brain volume correlate with higher value of group variable?

    • @how2stats
      @how2stats  6 років тому

      The group with the higher number has greater brain volume.

  • @BOAZOAB
    @BOAZOAB 12 років тому

    Great vid. I don't suppose you know of a way to run a rank-biserial correaltion (ordinal vs. nominal)?!

  • @ChristopherHor
    @ChristopherHor 12 років тому

    Thanks! Video definitely works better for us as compared to notes and writing~

  • @aslihankarabulut8987
    @aslihankarabulut8987 7 років тому

    Hey I have a question. If you have a control and experimental group (both of which let's assume are in the same school). How can I inhibit their interaction?

  • @MiAmourJulz
    @MiAmourJulz 12 років тому

    @lexcle so agree with you lol ... thanks for posting this youtube stats guy... really helped at 11 44pm in the nite... no stats teachers on call this time of day lol

  • @ircychannel7578
    @ircychannel7578 4 роки тому

    Terimakasih pak

  • @roitorcino7076
    @roitorcino7076 4 роки тому

    What if you had non-dichotomous data, what statistical tool should you use?

    • @how2stats
      @how2stats  4 роки тому

      Do you mean you have nominal data with three ore more categories (e.g., Canada, USA, Australia), or that your variable has three or more levels that are ordered somehow (Agree, Neither Agree/nor Disagree, Disagree)?

    • @segsb7085
      @segsb7085 2 роки тому

      @@how2stats I'm two years late but hoping you respond...I am also looking for the answer to this question..both with regards to nominal data with three or more categories (university departments) and ordered data (groups at different levels of education)...thank you!

  • @jerrycwz
    @jerrycwz 6 років тому

    Thank you very much! I love it!

  • @alfapp87
    @alfapp87 11 років тому

    ETA is equivalent too??

  • @lexcle
    @lexcle 12 років тому

    thanks so much for this video, i got a better of my data now :) its just a bummer that i cant use you as reference :D

  • @khilyatzaini5888
    @khilyatzaini5888 10 років тому +2

    what if the data not normal distribution?

    • @khilyatzaini5888
      @khilyatzaini5888 9 років тому

      thank you

    • @how2stats
      @how2stats  9 років тому +1

      +Khilyat Zaini Your best option is likely to use bootstrapping: ua-cam.com/video/9VjzPnoUBJQ/v-deo.html

    • @manowarornometalatal
      @manowarornometalatal 4 роки тому

      @@how2stats how about rank biserial though?

  • @nilaachmadichannel4326
    @nilaachmadichannel4326 8 років тому

    Very useful. Thank you very much. :)

  • @jake13122
    @jake13122 10 років тому

    How about a nominal variable and an interval variable?
    For instance:
    1 = North
    2 = South
    3 = East
    4 = West
    And then the other variable is population? So I am asking does population correlate with location? My hypothesis is that the north has a higher population.
    Thanks

    • @kamranahsan1
      @kamranahsan1 10 років тому +1

      I think in that situation, we would do Nominal by Interval Eta. A measure of association that ranges from 0 to 1, with 0 indicating no association between the row and column variables and values close to 1 indicating a high degree of association. Eta is appropriate for a dependent variable measured on an interval scale (for example, income) and an independent variable with a limited number of categories (for example, gender). Two eta values are computed: one treats the row variable as the interval variable, and the other treats the column variable as the interval variable. Go to Analyse>Descriptives>Crosstabs, then click Eta. I hope it would work.

    • @4mbiv4lenci4
      @4mbiv4lenci4 9 років тому

      Kamran Ahsan This was exactly my question ;) thx. :D I knew I want Eta but I couldn´t find it! ;)

  • @eddboxerthomson
    @eddboxerthomson 12 років тому

    Do you still need to know this? I have worked out a way using Excel. Easy once you set the spreadsheet up!

  • @vladimirmisin1876
    @vladimirmisin1876 7 років тому

    Why do we use Persons and not Spearmans. Isn't the data non linear but monotonich ?

    • @how2stats
      @how2stats  6 років тому +1

      Pearson's is remarkable. It can handle dichotomous IV and continuous IV. People call it point-biserial correlation in that case, but it's really just a Pearson correlation.

  • @nancygomez8743
    @nancygomez8743 11 років тому +1

    thank you so much for this video... :)

  • @isabellaleung8951
    @isabellaleung8951 4 роки тому

    Thank you so much!!!

  • @couragee1
    @couragee1 3 роки тому

    thank you

  • @yvetteburtworthington2540
    @yvetteburtworthington2540 2 роки тому

    yes. thanx

  • @cathyyeh11
    @cathyyeh11 11 років тому

    Thank you !

  • @Mahed47
    @Mahed47 11 років тому

    Thanks!

  • @RevolutionUtena
    @RevolutionUtena 12 років тому

    Seriously? All you do to run a point-biserial correlation is run a regular Pearson? I sure hope this is right, cause it's what I'm gonna say in my thesis defense.

  • @PPARTLO17
    @PPARTLO17 9 років тому +1

    So wait, to perform a point-biserial correlation in SPSS, you do the exact same thing as you would to perform a Pearson correlation in SPSS?...

    • @how2stats
      @how2stats  9 років тому +1

      +Paul Partlow Yes, exactly.

    • @chappo8100
      @chappo8100 8 років тому +2

      +how2stats why not call it a pearson? lol

    • @ebruturgal9936
      @ebruturgal9936 6 років тому

      It is a special case of the Pearson’s product-moment correlation

  • @vladimirmisin1876
    @vladimirmisin1876 7 років тому

    Variables are set up incorrect. It should be one scales other nominal

    • @how2stats
      @how2stats  6 років тому

      It doesn't matter for the actual analysis, as SPSS doesn't take note of that information. It's more for the user's benefit, or of you use one of SPSS's guided approaches to analysis (which I don't).