The Law is the ministry of death,the law of sin and death. The wages of sin is death. If you are not under the ministry of Christ( the holy spirit of liberty) ,to justify you from sin,then you pay for sin with death. Peter didn't kill them,they killed themselves by blaspheming the holy spirit by lying,whereas they are under the law( not giving all to the spirit) yet lying to have given all to identify with those under the spirit and could have contaminated their union,but paid the price of blaspheming against holy ghost. Nobody stopped them from joining 10% club under the law,but claimed to be born of the spirit and their name was not found in the book of life,hence the slayer slew them. And Nathan didn't kill David's first born,the God of David's covenant did. Even if David didn't touch Uriah's wife,he could have still died anyways from rebellion and disobedience to the King representing God. He didn't know what was done in secret yet rebellious to the King's instructions( it was not tolerable then). Joab would have slain him for trying to disobey the commander if he knew of it.He was a true soldier fighting for the kingdom and the Ark through the wrong way. If Joab obeyed the King's letter to cause him to be slain without asking questions, why should he disobey the King? If he accepted to go home he would have become automatic member of the royal family with their seed and secure eternal life in the last day for preserving the King's seed as a servant and abide like Eleazar of Damascus,but he refused and died. Besides,in the spiritual realm,his action was spelt treason( intending to kill the King's most important SEED) ,if he refused to go home, and the secret is revealed in future,his wife will be killed( because she can't reveal its for the king) and Uriah will permanently inherit the seed,which he could never be able defend at the cross in the new testament as overrighteous hiding Simon. Because all activities of old must be repeated in the new testament and the last day. So,he had to learn to defend the King's seed brought into his house by taking responsibility without knowing,and pass as the remorseful thief on the cross who was trying to covet burden he could not bear on this cross if not forced to do so,and eventually resurrect with his wife in Paradise on the last day,but with a NEW NAME( because Uriah can no longer live) as one loyal priest and the Ark he loved to defend was brought into his house. Let's not forget that David is an embodiment of all tribes of Israel,so we find out in the last day who committed the crime. The wise of Uriah was also the Mary Magdalene Jesus defended for adultery and took responsibility as the second offender( what Uriah could not do for the king),yet he was still dragged in by force to claim it on the cross( A type of Caleb). God punished David for lawlessness as long as he was still an active soldier. The right process was Nabal and Abigail,but as long as his overzealousness was for the Ark cause,he didn't deserve to die,let alone by hand of David. Although ,Ecclesiastics says overzealous people die before their time. Again, Nathan didn't kill Bathsheba's first born,but God permitted him to die because the first born must be Uriah's seed according to tradition. And the child would have been contentious with the King and even seek to overthrow him as revenge. So,its only at his death Bathsheba could birth David's real seed( the dominant seed). Analysing scripture in the flesh is blasphemy that can bring death,because such know not the intent of the spirit of God,or spirit of the Law. If God justified David,woe betides any who blasphemes the name God imputes no sin. Because in the last days,now here,all actions will be justified by the spirit of the word the right way. The letter kills but spirit still gives life to scripture.
He killed anania and sapphire othewise God is life only satan who still kill an destroy. Jesus is the WAY, TRUTH an LIFE. God is not a killer He's life. How many preachers has killed their followers in the name of God said. Remember same Peter tried to enforce circumcision of gentiles to qualify them for salvation bt apostle Paul confronted him. Same Peter was used by satan to try hidder christ's mission on redeeming man. Peter thought he was defending Jesus saying he'll not let Jesus died an it looks gd, concern, defending an care for Jesus bt was satan speaking in Peter Jasus turned to Peter rebuking, GET BEHIND ME SATAN. Jesus was not calling Peter satan bt satan in Peter. Peter later evn denied Jesus three times evn before the very girl who told him he looks like a follower of Jesus. Same Peter when he was sent by God in a vision to prayer for a certain family He was trying to argue with God calling those he was sent to unclean bt God asked him,,,, how can you call that hv cleansed unclean. He went preached to them an included others who joined the family, they were all filled with the Holy spirit. Peter was amazed by how gentiles could be saved an filled with the Holy spirit. All these senerials kept on changing Peter. He was still under the law otherwise promising an fail to fullfil things of the law, penalty was death. Evn circumcision was in the law of Jewish. The preachers killing their followers today, are using ministry of death the law which was written on stones. Evn apostle Paul baptised a family an other few people bt later realised he was not called to baptise bt to christ whose spirit is the born again believers baptise not physical water baptism from John. APOSTLES were daily growing in changes of the old testament new covenant. That's why evn James believed elders could use oil when praying to sick. They later realised all those physical symbols were shadows of the reality the new covenant btwn God an His son an that's where we church of christ belongs.
But those true old covenant prophets an an apostles in the new testament like Peter, they didn't kill willingly. They thought are defending the gospel of christ an prophets judged according to the law since were under the law then.
He was explaining the events of the scripture in the light of the character of God that was displayed in words or action by Christ Jesus and not in your in imagination or darkness of the old testament
That's bcs you are not reasoning with scriptures,did Jesus say son of man came not to destroy lives, did the scriptures say God gave us ministry of reconciliation? Think..Damina is 100%..
Let's not bit around the bible. When God kills n make alive it's because of his mercy endures forever. No Peter killed no one God did n no question asked 😊
@@chinemeremgift6663 You who have learned, where did the bible also say explicitly that peter killed Ananias and Sapphira? Please help me also learn like you.
@keekokkou9467 Someone is explaining what is not seen in the story, and you are double downing, claiming he is wrong by stating what the bible didn't state emphatically. The Bible teachers Job is to explain the bible not merely reading it. He has explained it. If you don't like the explanation explain your own, i will only that you explained yours in the light of the Character of God we displayed by Christ and not your imaginative representation of God
The Law is the ministry of death,the law of sin and death. The wages of sin is death. If you are not under the ministry of Christ( the holy spirit of liberty) ,to justify you from sin,then you pay for sin with death. Peter didn't kill them,they killed themselves by blaspheming the holy spirit by lying,whereas they are under the law( not giving all to the spirit) yet lying to have given all to identify with those under the spirit and could have contaminated their union,but paid the price of blaspheming against holy ghost. Nobody stopped them from joining 10% club under the law,but claimed to be born of the spirit and their name was not found in the book of life,hence the slayer slew them.
And Nathan didn't kill David's first born,the God of David's covenant did. Even if David didn't touch Uriah's wife,he could have still died anyways from rebellion and disobedience to the King representing God. He didn't know what was done in secret yet rebellious to the King's instructions( it was not tolerable then). Joab would have slain him for trying to disobey the commander if he knew of it.He was a true soldier fighting for the kingdom and the Ark through the wrong way. If Joab obeyed the King's letter to cause him to be slain without asking questions, why should he disobey the King? If he accepted to go home he would have become automatic member of the royal family with their seed and secure eternal life in the last day for preserving the King's seed as a servant and abide like Eleazar of Damascus,but he refused and died. Besides,in the spiritual realm,his action was spelt treason( intending to kill the King's most important SEED) ,if he refused to go home, and the secret is revealed in future,his wife will be killed( because she can't reveal its for the king) and Uriah will permanently inherit the seed,which he could never be able defend at the cross in the new testament as overrighteous hiding Simon. Because all activities of old must be repeated in the new testament and the last day. So,he had to learn to defend the King's seed brought into his house by taking responsibility without knowing,and pass as the remorseful thief on the cross who was trying to covet burden he could not bear on this cross if not forced to do so,and eventually resurrect with his wife in Paradise on the last day,but with a NEW NAME( because Uriah can no longer live) as one loyal priest and the Ark he loved to defend was brought into his house. Let's not forget that David is an embodiment of all tribes of Israel,so we find out in the last day who committed the crime. The wise of Uriah was also the Mary Magdalene Jesus defended for adultery and took responsibility as the second offender( what Uriah could not do for the king),yet he was still dragged in by force to claim it on the cross( A type of Caleb).
God punished David for lawlessness as long as he was still an active soldier. The right process was Nabal and Abigail,but as long as his overzealousness was for the Ark cause,he didn't deserve to die,let alone by hand of David. Although ,Ecclesiastics says overzealous people die before their time.
Again, Nathan didn't kill Bathsheba's first born,but God permitted him to die because the first born must be Uriah's seed according to tradition. And the child would have been contentious with the King and even seek to overthrow him as revenge. So,its only at his death Bathsheba could birth David's real seed( the dominant seed). Analysing scripture in the flesh is blasphemy that can bring death,because such know not the intent of the spirit of God,or spirit of the Law. If God justified David,woe betides any who blasphemes the name God imputes no sin. Because in the last days,now here,all actions will be justified by the spirit of the word the right way.
The letter kills but spirit still gives life to scripture.
Peter said you didn't lie to me but to the Holy Spirit...peter killed no one
He killed anania and sapphire othewise God is life only satan who still kill an destroy. Jesus is the WAY, TRUTH an LIFE. God is not a killer He's life. How many preachers has killed their followers in the name of God said. Remember same Peter tried to enforce circumcision of gentiles to qualify them for salvation bt apostle Paul confronted him. Same Peter was used by satan to try hidder christ's mission on redeeming man. Peter thought he was defending Jesus saying he'll not let Jesus died an it looks gd, concern, defending an care for Jesus bt was satan speaking in Peter
Jasus turned to Peter rebuking, GET BEHIND ME SATAN. Jesus was not calling Peter satan bt satan in Peter. Peter later evn denied Jesus three times evn before the very girl who told him he looks like a follower of Jesus. Same Peter when he was sent by God in a vision to prayer for a certain family He was trying to argue with God calling those he was sent to unclean bt God asked him,,,, how can you call that hv cleansed unclean. He went preached to them an included others who joined the family, they were all filled with the Holy spirit. Peter was amazed by how gentiles could be saved an filled with the Holy spirit. All these senerials kept on changing Peter. He was still under the law otherwise promising an fail to fullfil things of the law, penalty was death. Evn circumcision was in the law of Jewish. The preachers killing their followers today, are using ministry of death the law which was written on stones. Evn apostle Paul baptised a family an other few people bt later realised he was not called to baptise bt to christ whose spirit is the born again believers baptise not physical water baptism from John. APOSTLES were daily growing in changes of the old testament new covenant. That's why evn James believed elders could use oil when praying to sick. They later realised all those physical symbols were shadows of the reality the new covenant btwn God an His son an that's where we church of christ belongs.
But those true old covenant prophets an an apostles in the new testament like Peter, they didn't kill willingly. They thought are defending the gospel of christ an prophets judged according to the law since were under the law then.
Woow knowledge is power!!
He was explaining the events of the scripture in the light of the character of God that was displayed in words or action by Christ Jesus and not in your in imagination or darkness of the old testament
Wow this guy is rewriting the bible
Where did the Bible write that God killed those people?
That's bcs you are not reasoning with scriptures,did Jesus say son of man came not to destroy lives, did the scriptures say God gave us ministry of reconciliation? Think..Damina is 100%..
🤣🤣🤣
Let's not bit around the bible. When God kills n make alive it's because of his mercy endures forever. No Peter killed no one God did n no question asked 😊
You will never learn. Where did the Bible say God killed Annanias and Saphirra?
@@chinemeremgift6663where did the Bible say Peter killed Ananias and saphira?
@@chinemeremgift6663 You who have learned, where did the bible also say explicitly that peter killed Ananias and Sapphira? Please help me also learn like you.
@keekokkou9467 Someone is explaining what is not seen in the story, and you are double downing, claiming he is wrong by stating what the bible didn't state emphatically. The Bible teachers Job is to explain the bible not merely reading it. He has explained it. If you don't like the explanation explain your own, i will only that you explained yours in the light of the Character of God we displayed by Christ and not your imaginative representation of God
@@chinemeremgift6663 You couldn't answer either, just writing a lot... I thought you learned something worth sharing