Demonstrating diffraction using laser light - for teachers

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 сер 2024
  • In this short video, from the Institute of Physics and the National STEM Learning Centre and Network (www.stem.org.uk/), Michael de Podesta explains how a laser can be used to show the diffraction and interference of light. Using a laser pen in the classroom, the wave nature of light is demonstrated as a thin wire is used to generate an easily-seen interference pattern. Two versions of the video are available. This one is suitable for teachers and fully explains the demonstration and how the interference pattern is produced. The second is aimed at students and could be used in place of the demonstration.
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 100

  • @cynagye2096
    @cynagye2096 3 роки тому +99

    Looking at how he is explaining makes me love physics

  • @hoofheartedicemelted296
    @hoofheartedicemelted296 2 роки тому +6

    The difference between college and university level learning is in university level you are "reading" whatever subject matter, so in effect you are teaching yourself. Where as in college the teacher is teaching you, relaying the information and laying it all out for you and hopefully simplifying the subject matter as much as possible. I asked my brother how is it you have taught yourself to use cubase which at the time, many years ago, there was no tutorials for it. He said "if you have a passion for something, you will have eagerness to learn and it will be absorbed much easier".
    Well I have a passion for optics, but I'm still baffled and this teacher has made perfect sense. I'm struggling with a lot of the subject matter so diverse is it, but what he just explained was easy to absorb and made sense. Sometimes you just need the best teacher. The institute is blessed to have him. I am currently reading a book I bought called
    "Optics The Science of Light". It also has the IOP mark on it, and it's a fascinating read. But God what I'd give for someone to explain it in videos like the video above.
    I wish that this subject was available when I was at school. I think my life would have turned out quite differently indeed. Thank you good teacher for passing on this knowledge of physics and the science of light.

  • @Mufti199
    @Mufti199 4 роки тому +65

    Such a brilliant experiment! I'm definitely integrating in this in my class

    • @lorentz1617
      @lorentz1617 3 роки тому +5

      Definite integration 🙄

  • @kalitgautam
    @kalitgautam 4 місяці тому

    The most beautiful Diffraction video I have seen till date !!!

  • @LuvinaMacondo
    @LuvinaMacondo 4 роки тому +21

    Thanks! That's what I was looking for.

  • @maxheadrom3088
    @maxheadrom3088 4 роки тому +6

    I did it using two razors to form a slit. Excellent video!

  • @bethevers6391
    @bethevers6391 3 роки тому +12

    Thank you so much for a lovely demonstration to use in class.

  • @Spoder_07
    @Spoder_07 3 місяці тому

    His voice is so soothing, it made me forget I'm seeing this for homework

  • @nikorahmad
    @nikorahmad 5 років тому +8

    Im a physics teacher from Indonesia and i love it.. 👍

  • @pinacolarusso
    @pinacolarusso Рік тому +1

    This is a brilliant video. Short, rigorous yet fun!

  • @exoplanet11
    @exoplanet11 3 роки тому +2

    Thanks. A much better video than the old one MIT has up on the topic. Modern and conceptual. I am using this video for my physics students at San Francisco State Univ.

  • @fatimamir2006
    @fatimamir2006 3 роки тому +7

    Thank you Sir It was so interesting and easy to understand with more focus

  • @varshakhadilkar1646
    @varshakhadilkar1646 3 роки тому +7

    Who all are jee aspirants here

  • @arvind7820
    @arvind7820 2 роки тому

    Great Explanation sir. 🙏 🙏. The most aprecite thing is the quality of the images.

  • @applesweet55
    @applesweet55 2 роки тому

    His calmness eases my physics anxiety

  • @physicslelo7614
    @physicslelo7614 Рік тому

    Amazing style to teach and demonstrate.. loved it

  • @parithimathi
    @parithimathi 3 роки тому +2

    Excellent demo. Thanks. I'll use it in my class

  • @nikhilgarg2929
    @nikhilgarg2929 3 роки тому +12

    2:32 u will be able to see difraction

  • @theVO1D31
    @theVO1D31 Рік тому

    When you are truly in love with physics, you speak like this ⬆

  • @sheetalarya9669
    @sheetalarya9669 2 роки тому

    Amazing Sir 🔥
    Love and Respect from India 😊

  • @NikitaNair
    @NikitaNair 3 роки тому +2

    Amazing explanation!!

  • @michelecutini1503
    @michelecutini1503 5 місяців тому

    Excellent work, well done!!

  • @padmalathaumesh5590
    @padmalathaumesh5590 8 місяців тому

    Very beautifully explained, experiment is demonstrated so well, tku sir

  • @physarif
    @physarif 2 місяці тому

    Great explanation.

  • @kurshidulalamlaskar8744
    @kurshidulalamlaskar8744 2 роки тому

    Thanks to you for clearing my doubts regarding this topics

  • @rasheduddin8811
    @rasheduddin8811 2 роки тому

    loved this video presentation. awesome!

  • @iamvanshchauhan
    @iamvanshchauhan 2 роки тому

    Brilliant experiment

  • @mukeshwathore944
    @mukeshwathore944 2 роки тому +1

    Amazing explaination 🔥

  • @daydreams9113
    @daydreams9113 3 роки тому +7

    "For teachers" *me watching for fun* ;-;

  • @ag887s
    @ag887s 10 місяців тому

    Thank you for the explanation ❤

  • @syedhasnainahmed9097
    @syedhasnainahmed9097 Рік тому

    Excellent 👌
    Without double slit or diffraction grating

  • @dadagdadig5344
    @dadagdadig5344 3 роки тому

    Thankyou sir , I was just looking for this explanation.

  • @navneetkr.1192
    @navneetkr.1192 Рік тому

    Thnx, it was more helpful than one may think.😁

  • @genmckenna3718
    @genmckenna3718 Рік тому

    brilliant ..beautifully explain..thank you

  • @saritapal-dk4lg
    @saritapal-dk4lg Рік тому

    Simply explained👌👌👌

  • @gijoraj623
    @gijoraj623 2 роки тому

    Wonderful wonderful explanation

  • @suchismitabehera5783
    @suchismitabehera5783 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much sir.a great respect to you sir.explain the experiment nicely.

  • @rakesharora7714
    @rakesharora7714 8 місяців тому

    Thanks a lot

  • @sharad7340
    @sharad7340 4 роки тому +2

    Thanks my physics teacher used it for teaching

  • @-MikaelaWuisan
    @-MikaelaWuisan 2 роки тому

    Thank you Sir. It really helped me understand:) Have a good day..

  • @jaansayyed8632
    @jaansayyed8632 3 роки тому

    You really deserve more likes 👏👏

  • @ecwg8512
    @ecwg8512 4 роки тому +1

    Dr. Chan rise up

  • @bhigurammahato7228
    @bhigurammahato7228 2 роки тому +1

    Im looking for this Explaination

  • @shadowmonarch8304
    @shadowmonarch8304 3 роки тому

    This is amazing!

  • @Dashing_dev_18
    @Dashing_dev_18 15 днів тому

    Physics works ❤

  • @sandhya41a5
    @sandhya41a5 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much sir ❣

  • @mahirhasan9212
    @mahirhasan9212 3 роки тому

    This is awesome 💚

  • @Rohitsingh-dg1oj
    @Rohitsingh-dg1oj 5 років тому +7

    Sir what will happen if we project 2 laser together
    Will it show interference

    • @maxheadrom3088
      @maxheadrom3088 4 роки тому +4

      Well, there's interference but it's likely not visible because I don't think you can guarantee that every photon will be produced with a 90 degree phase difference. When the laser goes through the wire it forms something like circular waves on each side of the wire - with the same phase - and it's the interference between these two "sources" that produce the pattern. Huygens, when he proposed the wave nature of light, designed an experiment using a thin hole that should produce circular pattern of interference.
      A video showing waves in water: ua-cam.com/video/9guiF14NWpY/v-deo.html
      A simulation of the double slit experiment in water (each side of the wire behaves like on slit): ua-cam.com/video/0cztIj1m7e4/v-deo.html
      Hole electron diffraction from an Australian school: ua-cam.com/video/MiIAnxIZKQo/v-deo.html

    • @pham9479
      @pham9479 2 роки тому

      you can search Michelson interferometer

  • @ARCSTREAMS
    @ARCSTREAMS 3 роки тому +1

    ok i understand that constructive interference creates a double amplitude thus brighter light is that correct? and destructive creates no light as the throughs cancel but what about when there are different semi constructive or semi destructive phases 1/4, 1/2 etc where do these appear? are they the bands of light that are less bright and why are these happening further to the sides away from the middle? the same constructive patterns happen away from centre as well but why are those less bright though? also if we have a collimated beam of white light will there still be refraction and interference only it wont be creating fringes because there is a jungle of different light frequencies ? if so how come they still cast a near perfect shadow of whatever you put in front of this beam for quite a long distance before it blurs of fades away?

  • @fikirbirhanu5983
    @fikirbirhanu5983 3 роки тому

    thank a lot

  • @jamilurrahman6360
    @jamilurrahman6360 Рік тому

    Wonderful 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

  • @bravedelchannel5067
    @bravedelchannel5067 2 роки тому

    Thank you for explaining. You saved my day.hahahha

  • @mechanicsforigcse524
    @mechanicsforigcse524 2 роки тому

    very very nice

  • @odal6770
    @odal6770 3 роки тому

    What would happen if you brought the wire very close to the screen? Would we then see a shadow of the wire?

  • @robertwilsoniii2048
    @robertwilsoniii2048 3 роки тому

    This is awesome. It seems super obvious after spraying the lazer beam with water that it is a wave. You can see the oscillating photon partials moving towards the paper. I guess hitting hair causes the photons to scatter and bounce, I assume the same damn thing happens to water particles if you interfere with water waves.

  • @odal6770
    @odal6770 2 роки тому +1

    @Michael de Podesta did you ever spray the space between the laser and the screen after you had placed the wire? Did you see that light rays were reaching out to the screen, the way the central beam did? I think they do not and that is quite a puzzle. How do the reflections get on the screen if there was no impact other than that of the central beam?
    I would really appreciate it if you would react to this comment. Even if it is to show that I am completely wrong. If I could I would build the same setup as yours, but I am not very handy I'm afraid.

    • @razz6475
      @razz6475 Рік тому +1

      Woww.. that would be interesting to explore. Thanks.

    • @odal6770
      @odal6770 Рік тому

      @@razz6475 Please let me know what you find out.

    • @odal6770
      @odal6770 Рік тому

      @@razz6475 ua-cam.com/video/v_uBaBuarEM/v-deo.html The beam certainly is not as wide as the pattern on the screen, is it?

    • @razz6475
      @razz6475 Рік тому

      @@odal6770 yeah it isn't. The lady tried to explain using the arrows, which almost seems like divergence of electric field from a point source.
      Anyway really appreciate the comment.

  • @odal6770
    @odal6770 3 роки тому

    @Michael Podesta I wonder what one would see if one replaced the screen with a mirror? The circular spot of the laser and the wire? Or the same pattern as with the screen?

  • @n4v33nkum4r7
    @n4v33nkum4r7 3 роки тому

    This is basically Charlie Puth teaching me physics😳😳

  • @yerragudisivamohanredy8160
    @yerragudisivamohanredy8160 Рік тому

    Super 😙

  • @lepidoptera9337
    @lepidoptera9337 2 роки тому

    You want to expose the wave nature of light? Look at an oil film on water or press two glass plates against each other (microscope slides will do fine). No laser necessary.

  • @lovenaturechannel8080
    @lovenaturechannel8080 Рік тому

    i dont think so where is slit??? single slit or double where is

  • @ritazaghar8304
    @ritazaghar8304 2 роки тому

    est ce que vous pouvez faire la traduction en francais

  • @cslloyd1
    @cslloyd1 3 роки тому

    Feynman says light is not a wave at all, only a particle. He would have used QED and Feynman diagrams to explain this and would say QED is the most precise/correct theory in the history of science. Why do we keep talking about waves?

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 2 роки тому +1

      Because what Feynman means when he talks about particles are actually quanta. Quanta only exist wherever there is an irreversible energy transfer between an electromagnetic field and an external system. The notion of a quantum within the em field itself is unworkable (it leads to the well known problems with physical realism). It is also complete unnecessary. You do have to understand, though, that these details do not matter to Feynman because the formalisms of QED and QFT in general are taking care of this automatically (and so does the Copenhagen interpretation of non-relativistic quantum mechanics). As a theorist who is mostly concerned with predicting high energy physics phenomena he can allow himself to gloss over these details and it does not hurt his ability to make solid physical predictions. If you are more interested in the structure of quantum mechanics than actual physics (like the standard model), then you have to develop a somewhat refined sense for how you want to talk about these things. When you do, however, you will quickly realize that this refinement is mostly cosmetic. It doesn't allow us to make any physical predictions that do not also pop out of Feynman's crude way of talking about these things in the particle language of the high energy physicist. It's pretty much all just icing on the physics cake, if you like.

  • @mugdhomugdho3013
    @mugdhomugdho3013 Рік тому

    The producer is a BENGALI

  • @jeenasubedi22
    @jeenasubedi22 Рік тому

    Is this possible in normal room? Or need a dark room?

  • @hugohidalgoherencia5241
    @hugohidalgoherencia5241 11 місяців тому

    What happens if you do it with 2 wires ?

    • @delete7316
      @delete7316 29 днів тому

      I would guess that you'd have more pronounced dots with larger spaces between them due to more sources of interference. It would only be very slight and not easily visible to be different. If you want to see what would happen if there were loads of wires, look up diffraction gratings.

  • @DrAnkitJangid
    @DrAnkitJangid 2 роки тому

    Ok

  • @mayankpunai7093
    @mayankpunai7093 2 роки тому +1

    I am a student of FE4 batch any one here from GCI

  • @anujmalik7887
    @anujmalik7887 2 роки тому

    I am studying this in my class 12 [India] . Sometimes i feel like i am a scientist xd .

  • @archanasengar2854
    @archanasengar2854 3 роки тому +1

    He looks like Christopher Nolan

  • @harshitmishra3622
    @harshitmishra3622 3 роки тому +2

    Ha bhai DPS Gr.noida ka kon kon aya hai yaha pe 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @mdshimul1504
    @mdshimul1504 3 роки тому

    Thank you sir

  • @joeplana
    @joeplana 4 роки тому

    The pattern would disappear if you blocked one side of the divider.. would that be right? And equally if we marked the photons in some way to determine which side they travelled. It is essentially the same as a double slit experiment... or is there a significant difference?

  • @cynagye2096
    @cynagye2096 3 роки тому

    Normally I don't lol

  • @blackbuildinc
    @blackbuildinc 9 місяців тому +1

    Light. Light? Electromagnetic Radiation? Electromagnetic Waves? Light? There is so much more too light than science. If we are light, and everything is light why is it here and where did it come from? Why can it can have a momentum but not have a mass? You need a mass and a direction to create momentum...

    • @gregoralexander1856
      @gregoralexander1856 6 місяців тому

      Although it may be seemingly deceiving that an object needs to have mass to hold momentum, this isn’t the case at relativistic velocities as photons of light have energy in the electromagnetic form and since E=mc^2, energy means mass and therefore momentum

  • @atangreid4270
    @atangreid4270 4 роки тому +2

    Science class has me like 😴

  • @neerajpathak1600
    @neerajpathak1600 3 роки тому

    India🇮🇳 ❤

  • @fititocom
    @fititocom 6 місяців тому

    i like to use two tangled hairs to do the same

  • @jamesanonymous2343
    @jamesanonymous2343 Рік тому

    CURIOS TO KNOW,,,IF LIGHT IS A WAVE, AS APPOSED TO A PARTICLE, WHAT ARE IT'S (WAVE), CONSTITUENT PARTS ?

  • @jamesanonymous2343
    @jamesanonymous2343 Рік тому

    IF YOU'RE INTERESTED IN GETTING TO KNOW HEISENBERG AND HIS THEORY, THIS GUY WILL GET YOU STARTED
    IN THE RIGHT PLACE,,,AND THE RIGHT DIRECTION ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,GOOD LUCK ! THANKS,,,,INSTITUTE !