Apollo 15 - In The Mountains Of The Moon (1971)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 гру 2011
- Click to subscribe! bit.ly/subAIRBOYD
Astronauts: David R. Scott, Alfred M. Worden, and James B. Irwin
Featured are the standup EVA, the three traverses of the lunar surface, film taken from the Lunar Rover, hammer and feather test of Galileo's theory on falling objects in gravity fields, Worden's EVA, subsatellite launching, X-ray pulsar observations, splash down with one parachute collapsed.
AWARDS: Golden Eagle, Council on International Nontheatrical Events (CINE), 1972 - Chris Award, 20th Annual Columbus Film Festival, 1972
Credit: NASA/JSC Launch date: July 26,1971
HQ-217 - JSC-572 - (1971) - 28 Minutes
The most viewed aviation channel on UA-cam
#AIRBOYD #AvGeek - Авто та транспорт
Beautiful!! I'm 53 years old..I have not seen this footage since I saw it on TV when I was a kid.
Thanks for posting!
64mung bruh
@@p3ter408 bruh
Rudy Rauda Probably because they lost the original version and don't have the playback machine, because they destroyed that technology and it's a painful process to build it back up again.
did some recognize that he said creatures..and the scene with the rock:something is swinging(plant)
yea same here haha unreal
Love these old documentaries there's something about the music
Thats right 🤤🤤
Couldn't agree more.. everything back then seems better. It had more substance, everything now seems so lackluster and boring.
People are becoming less of what they were created to be. 😒😰
Agreed
@@MrWhiteav6 true, dont know why, but these old docs give me chills and more ...
I didn't know about the memorial they left on the Moon to all the astronauts and cosmonauts who had died. A very nice touch.
Just something you can search for and never find.
@@chriscoast2coast1207 Everything regarding Apollo is in the American public domain. There are billions of documents, including declassified documents, debriefings. scientific papers, physical evidence, etc. The hoax is complete nonsense and has never been debated outside of the internets silly hoax, myth, pseudoscience, paranormal, sci-fi, etc forums, websites, hoax videos.etc.
4:07
The erosion factors that can only arise from moisture and air erosion also occur on the moon in the Apollo 15 flight
RIP🌹 27 🌹
@@tammywhitaker963
4:07 apollo 15 fakes
Thank you. It was nice to relive a moment that I shared with my family years ago. My dad saw to it that we were interested in the things that went on around us. At that age...I would have missed it had it not been for him and my mom!❤️
I Remember this....awesome.....a time when hope and discovery was new and important, when things meant something and made me think about becoming an Astronaut myself.....I watched all of this when i was a teenager....never left me, and neither my sense for watching the night skies....I'm an Amateur Astronomer, and still watch the night skies......thank you for sharing
... thak you for sharing too.
These gentlemen are true heroes! It would be a true honor to shake their hands!
These acts make me proud of being human!
Only 4 of the 12 moonwalkers are still alive, and only 1 still alive was a mission commander. Better not waste time, if your goal is to shake their hands.
These men were fantastic Liars.
@@hotheadedjoelhaha
I keep asking you, and you keep ignoring the question... how's your drug habit going lately? Have you gotten past the 8 hour mark yet? Can you go 8 hours without getting high yet? Or, are you still stuck at 6 hours?
@@rockethead7 Keep dreaming.
@@hotheadedjoelhaha
4 hours?
Man is the living miracle of God . Man went to the moon with his own efforts , without the help of angels . Thank God for making Man so powerful .
Took a lot of men
Great for educational purposes thank you for sharing these important moon videos God bless 👏✌👍
Incredible moon mission. I wasn't born in that era but I am inspired by this mission, Astronauts and Great thanks for Dr. Wernher von braun he proved nothing is impossible for Human....
go look what he got written onhis headstone at his grave ... nasa is an occult masonic govt power house .. go work out what nasa means .. its missing 1 leter and as in occult , inverted (preversion and deception is the 3 of occult .. go learn who started it and their beliefs .. all isnt at it seems .. what was apollo god of ..
9:01 A truly spectacular view of the rille! 🙂
Going to the moon was a miracle back in 1960's . Thanks to the team of scientists , Astronuats and to the whole team of nasa to make this dream come true . Thanks to the goverment of America who provided the funds to make this mission impossible , possible . And in the last but not the least , many many Thanks to UA-camr for sharing these rare videos with us .
And a huge, huge thanks to Stanley Kubrick!
The budget for Gemini and Apollo was astronomical.
@@patricksmith4424 The very best evidence is that these missions were in direct competition with Russia. Russia was watching this mission unfold in detail, they had a satellite orbiting the moon at the time, they coordinated with NASA to ensure the two missions would not interfere with one another. Russia had kicked our butts at nearly every step of the space race until the moon mission. That was the finish line. They had every motive to expose the US if we faked it. They didn't. In fact they acknowledged the accomplishment. Also, other missions (of other countries) have photographed the landing sights and they show clear evidence of our missions to those locations. The question is, do the nay sayers have credible evidence to dispute that we went. So far they do not. They speak from paranoid delusions about conspiracies that are too complicated to actually work. We are talking about a government that has a big problem with keeping even small secrets for very long. This one would be impossible. This is not unlike the old days, when you would travel across the country by wagon. It took months. And then someone arrives by new fangled train, something you aren't familiar with, and they were only on the train a week. To you, someone who never heard of a train, that would seem impossible, it took you months when you did it. But, as you learn how the train works it makes sense. Same here. Once you do a bit of learning about how all the pieces of the rocket and orbits work, it makes a lot more sense. Don't be ignorant please do some research and study, OK?
@@ongabriendocaminos2197you know nothing
Thanks very much for the great real documentary about the moon landing 1972 . I really love this .
Me too.
Im not convinced. I just cannot believe anything anymore. There are soo many questions id like to ask.... Only time will tell.
No one cares that you’re wrong. I’m ok with it if you are.
Consider that transmission delay "it's coming very loose there..." at 15:57. You can hear it repeated in the astronaut's headset. About 2 seconds of delay. Exactly the needed time it takes for radio signals to travel from the Earth to the Moon.
We have had thousands of years of dreaming before it and fifty years after this small window of time when some people of the earth traveled to the moon.
It’s a damn shame that so many want to just call it fake instead of studying and marveling at the rare opportunity.
At this point I think what would be best is if instead of trying to go to Mars they just went back to the moon and land right near the old landing sites to prove to everyone they really happened. Otherwise when they go to Mars people will just say it was fake too.
Agreed, I think there are many things about the moon they still won't tell us, some very weird nasa images\documents
Been to the Moon... MARS. New Horizons 🚀🇺🇲
The Genesis Rock.
Men have been dreaming of going to the moon since the days of Jules Verne, and even before. It came to a head with two nations competing to get there first, then it came to a halt. Why? Answer, because one of them made it there and did it . They also found out there isn't a whole lot there except a lot of DUST which makes it the most inhospitable place ever. I understand that once they opened the door of their hospital operating room sanitary lunar lander and tracked that dust in it was like the equivalent of opening up a big bag of fiberglass dust and throwing it all over.
I think that alone may have been a large part of the reason they stopped going there.
Besides that, low earth orbit became much, much more important.
When I was a kid they taught us that we would have to build a big space station before going to the moon, as it turns out we went to the moon first then built space stations.
@@tammywhitaker963 What do you mean by Genesis Rock
The smoking gun of not going to the Moon was the faces of the astronauts giving the interview after they supposedly came back, three sad faces. I have a happier face just eating icecream lol.
YOU SAID: "The smoking gun of not going to the Moon was the faces of the astronauts giving the interview after they supposedly came back, three sad faces. I have a happier face just eating icecream lol."
== THAT is your "smoking gun" evidence?? Nothing concrete?? No evidence of faking radar data?? No deathbed confessions of the 450,000 people who worked on Apollo?? "Sad faces" is your evidence?? What an idiot. And, tell me, dummy, how exactly would you feel if you worked 18 hour days preparing for the mission, then spent 8 days crammed inside a small craft, then spent weeks in a tiny quarantine facility, then went on a world-wide tour of dozens of countries for another month and a half, sleeping only a few hours a day, usually in the chair of an airplane to the next city/country, giving countless press appearances and speaking appearances all day long, again, for 18 hours a day, before being flown out to the next destination, then dragged into another press event?? And, did you watch the whole thing? They were pretty well spirited, even dropping a few jokes here and there, until the Q&A started, when they had to answer the same old questions that they had been answering for weeks. Sorry that you've swallowed the standard conspiratard lie that this was their "first" event, and that they were "sad" the whole time, but that's your problem, not mine. You don't know what you're talking about.
Sure thing, Mr. Short School Bus.
@@robertcampbell6349 i dont think ppl that the ride short bus would even believe we went to the moon anymore 😂
@@Pghgrav Get back to work. Those burgers won't flip themselves.
Came just for the comments!!
@Brian S "Me too ",I came to tell people "science is provable"."And libraries are still free" NASA can't lie, even if they wanted too, we would catch them. Of course, all the internet scientists are sure they're smarter than the 375,000 men and women who worked for the 20,000 NASA subcontractors during the 12 year Apollo program..LOL
Thank you for uploading this. I was able to embed it onto my Outer Space page. Gave me chills to watch.
Sure wish I had been old enough to appreciate these amazing Apollo missions, exploration at it's most thrilling and awe inspiring - what the hell have we done since that compares ?
We've managed to breed and raise a bunch of non thinking idiots who know nothing other than what they're told to think by fake videos that pander to their feelings that they are 100% convinced are the truth.
Freaking pitiful.
Its fake dummy
You didn't miss anything. It was all FAKE!
@@scottmitchell358 Get a life
@@scottmitchell358 Isn't it amazing how people can watch these videos and just be in awe at the beauty of what they perceive to be the moon, yet when I watch them, I think to myself what is preventing these people from seeing how fake this looks! Even the dialogue between the astronaut's sound like something you would hear on a Leave it to Beaver episode. How long can NASA keep this charade going? I know NASA has a great excuse for never having stars in any of the shots but not one picture of the sun ever? Seriously? A lot of people don't like some of the things Bart Sibrel did, especially when he tricked some of the astronauts in to doing interviews under false pretenses but I'm glad he did. Astronauts Gone Wild proved these guys were all liars. If they had really went to the moon, then they would never have acted the way they did. NASA deceived an entire world and is still laughing all the way to the bank.
Thanks for sharing. Just recently saw the Apollo NASA Exhibit at the SC State Museum. Crazy ENERGY in there that day.🇺🇲🚀🎵🌌⏳✌️
Great content! Thanks for the memories!
"Man must explore"
It's amazing to me that we did all this so long ago and haven't been back.. Yet... Great video, thanks
Intentionally haven't gone back in my opinion, disclosure is happening now with all of the UFO sightings. Governments can't conceal it any longer now that everyone has phones with excellent cameras
My my... Even a 1970s....I love it... So nostalgic.... So great... But again... It is from you ...... Your amazing Mr. H...❤️😁👌👍
They were all Great ! But Dave Scott has always been my favorite ! Awesome pilot , astounding astronaut , & amazing human being !
It was nice to relive a moment that I shared with my family years ago. My dad saw to it that we were interested in the things that went on around us. At that age...I would have missed it had it not been for him and my mom!❤
First saw this on satellite TV on a German channel that would play them on a loop at night about 20 years ago. Was called 'spacenight'. Inspirational stuff! 👍❤️😊
Astounding Amazing and Beautiful ! Really enjoying watching the footage from this exciting time. Im 58 and haven't seen this for a very long time. Thank you so much for posting xx
I got into that ! It's a must watch for the week in us all
Thanks Airboyd
Awesome. Very inspirational. God bless Dave Scott, Al Worden, and Jim Irwin. Thank you, gentlemen, for your service.
Wow. I thought I’d seen and read it all but apparently not. The hammer feather drop is beautiful and I am sad I’m seeing it now for the first time at 43. And the memorial plaque and little figurine: wow. Just wow. Don’t think I’ve even seen a pic of it in all the space books
I read growing up. Remarkable!
i aint a looker, thats for sure
This place will definitely be a popular spot for future exploration
I appreciated the memorial at 26:50 for all those who gave their lives in space travel, including the Soviet astronauts. They were just as brave as NASA's crew.
Names on the plaque;
Charles A. Bassett II
Pavel I. Belyayev
Roger B. Chaffee
Georgi Dobrovolsky
Theodore C. Freeman
Yuri A. Gagarin
Edward G. Givens Jr.
Virgil I. Grissom
Vladimir Komarov
Viktor Patsayev
Elliot M. See Jr.
Vladislav Volkov
Edward H. White II,
Clifton C. Williams Jr.
Gave their lives for space travel ? You are having a laugh aren't you ?
@Hal 9000 Twat
@Hal 9000 a) Nothing you said was true so why would I be hurt?
b) Why would anyone be hurt by a comment on the internet?
c) You childish comments just reinforce my assessment of you.
I dont think any humans have died in space..just reentry
Why is thsre thick shadows from rocks on yhe ground yet none from the hills next to them?
So you're suggesting maybe the "thick" rock shadows were painted there, or something? What is a thick shadow, as opposed to a thin one?
@@MrJdsenior i mean thick as in. Size. Of shadow.
Yes shadows would always be thick, by your definition, as they were always there at lunar morning.
I am really happy that I have seen the real thing on TV from 11 to 17
I looooved this video
I realize that 1960's technology was more advance than today's. But despite this, I find it strange that no astronaut at any moment, mentions how hot/ cold it feels considering the temperatures out there. Or at the very least hear some praise about how well the space suit's liquid hydrogen refrigerating circuit combined with the micro particular lead covered nanoporous breathable polyethylene textile works
Lol. It was all a scam. Money is the root of all evil.
The issue with temperature it that there’s no atmosphere, so the extreme temp. was only on their feet
Actually, Aldrin on Apollo 11 mentions this very fact about 40 minutes into his EVA. So once again, another “mystery” resolved.
Lindo trabalho.
Parabéns sempre NASA.
Sim, parabens com o fakery! I'd listen to these two cosmonauts... who say that the earth is flat:ua-cam.com/video/-DlvWoZLBHs/v-deo.html
- and that space doesn't exist - or we've never been there: ua-cam.com/video/ipDfJwkmkj8/v-deo.html
Then I would take some time - as long as it takes - to research Flat Earth, and Nasa's fakery... Enjoy!
I used that same Plutarch quote to conclude my high school graduation speech, I had wanted to use it ever since I first saw this documentary.
Cool lvid.. thanks from NZ 👍🇳🇿
No camera can capture how beautiful the moon lookd
Lol
At 20:54 there are tire tracks veering off to the right of the rever. They forgot to bring the zamboni...bologna.
Um, bologna? Zamboni? What ARE you talking about?
rockethead7 .. A zamboni is an ice resurfacing machine. And you berate other people for not doing research?
@@Iam_Dunn
Yes, dummy, I know what a Zamboni machine is. What does that have to do with the moon landings?
There was obviously a practice run across the set that left the tire track marks.
They failed to blend the joy ride practice run tire tracks into the virgin surface of the moon.
Zamboni...boligna
Awesome!👏👏👏
From Dave Scott's essay in National Geographic, September 1973:
“The rover functions impeccably as we ride from site to site, accumulating fragments of history. We bounce and pitch across omnipresent chuckhole-like craters. The motion exactly resembles that of a small boat in a rough sea; so does the effect. Incredible as it seems in the arid environment of the moon, seasickness could become an occupational hazard.”
I remember that story in NG. It was a side piece to the expansive coverage of the Apollo 17 mission. A wonderful, yet sad bow out of National Geographic's long coverage of the future, present and now past moon missions.
@@brianarbenz7206 They really did a good job of covering the space program up through the early seventies. Most of what I knew about the Apollo program back then was what I learned from their excellent articles and pictures and the detailed and interesting articles by Kenneth Weaver.
I giggle everytime I watch this! I would like to Major Matt Mason.
The name Hadley Scott can't be a coincidence.
The LEM "taking off" from the Moon was awesome-sauce
I wonder who took that film as it went up and up, the camera following the capsule;
WHO took that shot???
Tom, in service to Christ I think that's the same news crew that filmed the first lem landing on the moon. They must also be the ones who took video ABOVE the orbiter as it sped around the room. Those people have never received an ounce of credit.🤣
@@jonathanshaw3755 everything about Nasa is space-fakery and the astronomical theft of American money
Thank stanley Kubrick
@Thane Mac no it's not common knowledge; why hasn't it been used since then?
I tried to watch as much as i could. CBS aired most of the major activity on the moon,but they did not show this stuff. I had just joined the Army in 1971.
At 22:50 just before start, there are visible 2 stars and something odd in upper left conner of the screen? It is very strange to say the least.
Przemyslaw Buska something odd? Part of the vehicle the camera is mounted on.
Thinking the "stars" are probably junk (dust) on the lens, common in photography. You can see when the astronauts are moving around deploying scientific equipment (like cameras) the stuff is flying everywhere, and all over their suits. When backlit, small (very thin), and semi transparent, this happens a lot.
Moon dust may ultimately be one of the biggest obstacles to "living" there, believe it or not (mark my words). It is not dust, as we think of it, weathered and round, it is more like VERY tiny shards of glass, a large percentage of it (ejecta), and it gets into EVERYTHING. The astronauts can be heard complaining about it, and the impossibility of keeping it out of the vehicle in several vids and transcriptions, and spent a LOT of time trying to "house keep" it away.
Think more volcanic ash than dust we are used to dealing with, which can destroy machinery it gets into, and that is picked up electrostatically by everything (tools, boots, suits, gloves, machinery, etc.) and sticks to everything it comes in contact with.
If I remember correctly they even removed their moon excursion suits and left them behind in the discarded LM upper stage, before they entered the command module for return to Earth, to try to keep the dangerous mess (even to lungs) out of that vehicle (maybe not, but I seem to remember that, obviously they'd have to have more than one suit each to do that, again, not sure, but I wouldn't be surprised if the moon expeditionary suits were of different design than the command module suits, since they would HAVE to be if the backpacks were integral, again, don't remember).
The upper left is some piece of equipment. They left scientific instruments there in every mission.
.great video .beatiful moon deserts
Oh no, I just saw something that tells me we've been had.
And it's a big secret so you're not going to tell anyone.... right? :-)
Some peeps will believe Anything yet in nothing but fibberonius
Nature and Physics A NASA excursion to Antarctica was done prior to 1969 to collect lunar samples from meteorites. This is common knowledge. Not necessarily proof of the landing.
@@DA-sv2iw - It is only "common knowledge" to conspiracy theorists who make false claims about Von Braun's Antarctica expedition, knowing that certain people would believe them without question.
Lunar meteorites were first identified in 1982, *10 years after the last Apollo mission!* Until then, there was only speculation among a few that such meteorites could exist, but no-one had identified them to prove it.
After years of analysis of the rocks/samples returned by Apollo and the tiny amount of moon samples returned by the USSR, features unique to moon rock were identified. So in 1982, when analysis of a meteorite revealed the *same* features, it proved for the first time that a meteorite originated from the moon.
Therefore unless Von Braun was a time traveller who went back to the 60s, there's no way he or anyone else could have known about lunar meteorites, much less identify them among all the other meteorites (and why would a rocket scientist rather than a geologist be sent to collect fake 'moon rocks' among meteorites?).
Today, only about 100 pounds of lunar meteorites have been identified worldwide since their discovery in 1982, whereas Apollo returned 840 pounds of moon rocks/samples, including core samples up to 9 feet long!
But that's not all, *meteorites have a very violent history!* Travelling significantly faster than any bullet, meteoroids enter earth's atmosphere which causes them to heat up until they glow white hot, where the molten outer layers are stripped away as they tear through our atmosphere. If any rock is left to reach the surface, it _smashes_ into the earth.
Hence there's a *huge difference* between meteorites and the pristine moon rocks picked up from the moon's surface with their intricate microscopic surface detail still intact. Therefore even the most inexperienced geologist would not mistake a meteorite for a moon rock, much less experienced geologists throughout the world.
In other words, the claim that Von Braun or ANYONE went to Antarctica to collect 'moon rocks' during the 60s is nonsense on many levels :-)
James Erwin described in his book ‘To Rule the Night’ that he put up an array of 300 glass reflectors. This Laser Reflector device is still being used today by astronomers on earth to shine laser, reflected back for precise distance ranging. This can sense distance change of earth surfaces for earthquake detection.
thank you so much for shareing . i never seen that before and it was great
LMG YOU'RE BORN AFTER 2000 .. IT'S ALL A SCRIPTED MOVIE.. IT'S THROWN AT SOCIETY ALL DAY ..UP TO YOU WAKE UP..SPACE MAY BE THE FINAL FRONTIER BUT IT'S MADE IN A HOLLYWOOD BASEMENT...
9:53-9:59 that is mind BLOWING!!
bubble helmets 😂😂😂😂
Most beautiful thing he’s ever seen. It’s just a beautiful little valley 🤔
Those are some big mountains...🧐
I might could of been there longer. Kind of an unproven thing to say at the time.
It's so true if you think about it... No one has ever seen that rock, nor touched it...
My respect to all the space pioneers that took part in those dangerous missions to enlarge our horizon of knowledges. It is a shame to think that everything was a long time fake. Such approach disregards the hard work of thousand people involved in those beautiful projects.
Great stuff ......a rather lighthearted mentioning here about the jolly fanfare music during a white nuckle Lem ascend from the Moon , which later was considered controversial , the loud music which could interfere with concentration during this dangerous phase, when the astronauts should be able to hear each other and Capcom.
Houston wasn't happy about that at all. Which ofcourse emerged years later.
Awesome
Pretty good studio work
Lol what you don't think this landing video is real?
Pssssst. They never calculated trajectory for the 200 mph solar winds. If corse they didn’t know about them back then. Not to mention these little guys rip the edges of our atmosphere off into space. Oh ya they also are hitting the surface of the moon. Yes they are constantly moving. Oh oh ya NASA now admits we lost the technology to go back and we have to figure out how to protect astronauts from these winds. The darkness cannot comprehend the light. When the light shows up darkness runs.
Couldn't agree with you more
Olá excelente documentário eu tenho saudades daqueles tempos era tudo mais e tudo que se fazia era na raça.
Abraço e se cuida😷
Wow I wish I was there I think I was with the all who were there in spirit
At :58 Nice tunnel entrance that everyone likes to talk about since they first saw it !?!?
Dale Rogers. You can pull up high-resolution images of the tunnel. NASA as well as the German space agency and Arizona State University have used NASA's LROC spacecraft .to map and study the Moon. The Germans and Arizona state operated the LROC independently of NASA on their own money. In other words , the German space agency and ASU had control over the spacecraft and cameras,etc..I'm not clear on how Arizona state worked with NASA.I imagine NASA might have reduced the fees being this was a teaching university in American.
So if you have a computer and some software, [photoshop is excellent ] you can blow up and crop detailed images of the tunnel. I haven't pulled up any images, but beware the tiff files are huge files. You can now examine the Moons geology, Apollo, Soviet, China,etc landing sites , etc in amazing detail.
Покажите ту камеру или её описание её характеристик, которая снимала этот старт. Она должна иметь автоматическую фокусировку и систему удержания снимаемого объекта в кадре. То есть, она должна иметь электропривод на фокусировке и привод для изменения угла съемки по вертикали. При этом должна быть электроника для управлением работой этих приводов с соответствующими алгоритмами, процессором и памятью. На весь процесс управления, из 36 секундного ролика, остаётся всего несколько секунд.
В то время никаких процессоров еще не было и кинокамеры управлялись с Земли. Они имели полный электропривод. Некоторые, которые были установлены на Аполлоне 11 этого не имели.
The greatest show of the americans. Pity there was no Netflix those days.
structures in the pictures they were reviewing clear as day
You can bet there bien watched by the👽doing there drilling I hope there’s someone out there remembers a alien crouching down on one nee sow he could not be seen fully against the moon horizon . This footage confirmed it for me when I seen it I hope someone else remembers this 👽👽😱x
lmao wow pay attention at 18:35 to around 18:52. Watch how the lightsource is movied over the astronauts heads to light them up better, this cannot be explain as the aperture of the camera opening wider to make it brighter, because when that happens the surrounding terrain because out of focus and blurry, watch when the light gets brighter you can distinctly still see every distinguishable hole and rock on the ground, and also note the glare on the rocorder, you can clearly see the lightsource
Maybe they went to a different moon, certainly not earth's moon.
Well, comment is nine years old and you might be dead but, another more reasonable explanation is that light was reflecting off their extraordinarily bright white spacesuits back into the camera, brightening the surroundings.
what's the discrepancy there following there one tracks back
their their
pwned
@AIRBOYED - Nice movie. What camera did you use?
So all original films are lost and the one that we can watch are all copies?
No original films are lost. Where'd you get that idea?
@11:00 the astronaut starts an experiment to throw the packaging; when he loses his footing and starts falling down. He puts his hand down to catch himself; and doesn't even appear to touch the lunar sand; but somehow miraculously lurches upwards & lands upright on his feet again...How can you honestly NOT call BS on that?
So you notice that also. Exactly what I thought. 😆
He clearly used the tool in his right hand to help catch his fall. You can see the dirt clearly fly out from it. The space suit he’s wearing is also highly pressurized, which obviously assisted in rebounding to its pressured state as he got that low to the surface. But fun for you, though, picking out a tiny little thing you can’t explain and using that to decide the whole thing was faked!
@@shlubydub lol. Yeah buddy this was all fake 🙄
show........... muito bom
Great vid you might want to screen shot the vid when there in the control room and the pictures on the table zoom in and you will see what thay really whent for
It's not only disrespectful to the astronauts to accuse NASA of a conspiracy but also immensely insulting to the more than 400,000 people that ultimately made the missions possible.
JaysCyYoung1 400,000 morons who had no idea they were talking to astronauts in the desert.
Insult to the public socialism nwo good ole boy system. Had to change
8:20 - 8:45 The shadow of the rover's dish antenna doesn't change as the rover rolls across the surface at a good clip. How far away would a stage light have to be to leave a shadow like that?
93 million miles away.
Why the fuck are people discrediting it? There has been 6 lunar landings, so much evidence out there regarding the design and development of the apollo missions. How could it have been impossible to land on the moon? It all makes sense how they managed to do it, there is so much information that it cannot be discredited. You're too stupid to understand how they did it, so your only conclusion is that it was faked. Read about it, learn about it and draw your own conclusion. I have and it seems very credible that it happened, and yes they has the technology (just about) to pull it off.
@@EinkOLED You apparently failed to realize that Deploracle is on your side. Read again. He said the light source is 93 million miles away, which goes AGAINST the moon hoax nutbags who think that this is a studio.
I was confused too. I've never studied shadows much, but can never recall seeing one in varying monotone, like its a photo. I've always seen them in black or nothing. Another thing, the moon surface is shot in monotone, yet the image has a camera covered in the usual gold foil in front of everything.
@@tonymak9213 weird, Don't you think ?
AWESOME !!! What more can you say ???
Gullible much?
@@yomommaahotoo264 Hush. Your ignorant comment is that of a Troll.
@@apolloskyfacer5842 Aha!
A Bot Shill
@@yomommaahotoo264
@@yomommaahotoo264 dickhead much?
People calling it fake, I'd really like to hear what a real one would look like...
Given how far technology has advanced, this kind of thing should be routine and happening on a weekly basis.
The fact that something is possible to do does not mean it is useful, economic, or logical to do again.
@@jmrico1979 So how were they able to fund it back then and not now?
@@k.s.333 Back then I believe congress assigned Nasa's funding. Apparently those congressmen thought beating the russians to the moon was a matter of the utmost national importance. Now, the thinking has changed. There's no reason to spend billions in doing something that you have already done and delivers virtually 0 return.
@@jmrico1979 I highly doubt going to the moon "delivers virtually 0 return".
@@k.s.333 Well. I myself would agree with you there. What I meant was, in the eyes of US Congress, it delivers 0 return. It's the same thinking that pulled the plug on the shuttle program.
the mountains are so lovely they forgot to turn the cameras so that we could see them (instead of looking at the bloody ground!) you can describe anything to the listening public without the pictures to back them up.
I don't know why my post is not visible now. Maybe it's because I included around a dozen links to the photographs that you think don't exist. Anyway, the answer is that they took hundreds of photos of the mountains. It's true that they verbally described the mountains in a stand-up EVA from the top hatch of the LEM, prior to the first EVA when they climbed out onto the surface. They hadn't yet set up a TV video camera for the ground based geologists to be able to see what they were seeing, so in the meantime, they verbally described them instead. Is that what you're referring to? But, anyway, the bottom line is that they took hundreds of photos of the mountains on Apollo 15, and thousands in total across all of the mission photography. I don't know why you're saying that they "forgot to turn the cameras." You have ZERO understanding of this topic.
@@rockethead7 pls answer my question: Why are you so mean to other people ? Are you choleric? I think so.
@@SpaceTime773
After your ridiculous nonsense you've repeatedly spewed at me, you don't get to complain.
@@rockethead7 nonsense ? What do you mean ?
@@SpaceTime773
I'm not playing this game with you.
This is great footage. I hope when they launch in 2024 they’ll get extra HD footage
LOLOLOLOLOL You government worshipping slack jawed mouth breathing fool.
It's been a half century now since the apollo hoaxes. Keep praying to our government God and maybe....just maybe someone will eventually make it to the moon on the next century or two.
@@yomommaahotoo264 Hey Yo', Why chew gotta be such a dousche bag ???? Life's to short for that kinda nonsense !!! You really need to learn to love Uncle Sam !!!
@@sumbeech1484 And I will.....the minute they start obeying and protecting our constitution, stop with the false flag wars, abolish their exclusive unconstitutional immunities, and own up to it's past criminality.
@@yomommaahotoo264 I'm with you on the wars, we've spilled enough blood and money. It's time we worry about America and the American people. But we did go to the Moon nine times and 9/11 was a terrorist attack over our continued aggression and support of those in the Mid East that Al Qaeda, considered enemies.
@@Godscountry2732 OBL and the hijackers were patseys and any footage our on-the-take corporate owned media showed was in different airports BEFORE 911.
The WTC buildings were planted with nano thermate. It was a demolition.....all done because Saddam Hussein threatened to dump basing his oil production on the petro dollar, which would domino and cause a collapse of our fiat printed world dollar standard.
No one including all of the Space Shuttle missions have ever been beyond the Van Allen radiation belts because of the deadly radiation of outer space. Without the earth's magnetic fields there would be no life on earth, and likewise if man were sent beyond those protective magnetic belts.
We cannot send into space the weight of lead or water necessary to shield us from that deadly radiation no matter what Star Trek movies said.
It was....and still is a hoax that anyone ever did...or probably ever will travel beyond the Van Allen radiation belts, no matter what a bunch of well paid nasa and government parrots instruct our on-the-take media to tell us.
I didn't know they left that plaque. Cool.
This is Soo Precious!!..I was born in 1969,..I was 2😊 BEAUTIFUL FOOTAGE🌕🚀😍
What is the bright domed object by the side of the mountain in frame 3:44
mickmoonstudy cansell idk I saw other images that seemed to show just the tip of metal spheres coming out of the craters.
What do you think. UFO craft just chillin......
mickmoonstudy cansell it’s not a ”dome”. It’s just an ordinary, partially illuminated Moon hill.
@@YDDES Correct
At time stamp 20:38 are those preexisting tire tacks?
Yes. Here's a map of the rover traverses. They sometimes went back over their path to get back to the lander.
lunarscience.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/a15_traverse2.png
Good god. Cmon, think.
man it makes me feel bad for the flat earth folks and there lack of understanding.( no wonder they are all so grumpy)... this is fantastic... To grasp what we did.. I am just glad that I was old enough to watch every launch from the first mercury to the last apollo and the first few space shuttles... It was an exciting time.. thanks for that share guys.. it brought back some good memories...
Thank you for posting this. It really brings back memoriez for me.
Notice they never pan around to see around them..NEVER
What is your feeble-assed point, pray tell ?
You're wrong. 100% bullshit. There are several times that the rover camera does a 360 degree pan around. Go watch ALL of the videos, not just the ones other conspiratards spoon-feed you.
@@rockethead7 send us a link.....????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? YOU NAIVE FUCKING TOOL
@@brietebank9582 🤣
@@rockethead7 still waiting for that link there rockhead🎱....i mean rockethead7...my bad.....you damage control dis info bum.....foh
next time, we can just take a Tesla model X along. I wonder if it will fit in a Dragon V-2 capsule?
Ahh, dragon, V-3, of course!
Radio signals are directional or line of sight. To receive a satellite signal to watch SkyTV the small dish, about 90cm in diameter on your house, must be pointed directly at the satellite which is stationed at a geosynchronous orbit. The satellite relays TV signals from a ground station and transmits the signal back down to the earth surface. Everyone knows that if the dish is moved even slightly the TV signal is lost. The same goes for the radio, telemetry signals transmitted from the moon during the Apollo landings. The transmitted signal strength was about 20 watts which required a large dish on earth to receive a clean signal. There were various dishes pointed at the moon receiving these signals as it orbited around the earth; Jodrell Bank, Parkes in Australia and Goonhilly down. The Russians were also monitoring the signals using the multiple array antenna dishes at North Station. Radio hams were also able to detect the VHF signals of the Astronauts conversation...
www.arrl.org/eavesdropping-on-apollo-11
Baysinger says that on the night of the Apollo 11 landing, he and Rutherford had to essentially aim the antenna at the Moon by getting behind
it and sighting it like a gun. This was difficult since the weather was cloudy and the Moon not easily visible. The antenna, which was originally built for
Baysinger’s radio astronomy work, had a motorized steering mechanism but it had to be manually guided. Its “beam” or “field of view” was such that, once pointed at the Moon, it could be let go for a little while, but pretty soon it would have to be re-aimed because the motions of the Earth and Moon caused the Moon to drift out of the antenna’s field and the signal to be lost. In fact, this was one piece of evidence that the Apollo 11 signals the receiver picked up were indeed from the Moon - if the antenna was not kept aimed at the Moon, the signal disappeared. Baysinger’swife and daughter watched the Apollo 11 landing on TV while Baysinger and Rutherford listened via Baysinger’s equipment. The signal on the home-built equipment came through approximately 5-10 seconds earlier than the signal on TV. It was noisy, but you could hear what was going on.
So if they never landed on the moon can someone please explain how the US managed to fake the radio and telemetry data as coming from the moon ?
The movie "The Dish" is about an Australian receiving station charged with receiving the landing video feed for 11.
Apollo 11 only had a quad dish array and like you say has to be pointing to Earth to within 2 degrees to be picked up from any of the large arrays here on Earth, which again as you say the motions of the Earth and moon would make it impossible to have a continouse signal, using the website www.everythingrf.com you will work out that the 20 watts fed into the quad array would not detectable, when you feed in 200 watts it was possible only if in perfect alignment, for Baysinger to receive VHF signal would be impossible with his equipment so its best to ignore this story, probably was paid to tell it, look up FSPL (free space path loss) It is well documented that a signal decreases in a way that is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source, another way to express this is the signal = 1 divided by distance squared. (inverse square law)
Of course I can explain why the ISS can fly with a horizontal attitude: It can fly with a horizontal attitude because it has an orbital speed which allows to create a centrifugal force which counters the earth attraction.
When the LM is near the moon with a low horizontal speed, it no longer benefits of this centrifugal force; and, unlike a plane on earth, it does not benefit of the air lift either; so it has to counter the lunar attraction with its engine.
Where are the samples that we took away from the moon?
@FrawgyFreshOnions BS
apollo 11 had over 400 lbs of samples
@@StevEvil666 Duh.
Amazing!!!
Best Apollo Mission !
why at 20:35 can i clearly see the traces left by the tires of another vehicle?
@Kit Canyon I was waiting for an idiot with this reply.
@Kit Canyon please close yourself inside a flush toilette
he said it was equipped with a camera to track the star patterns. I've never seen any stars from iss or moon pics.
The answer is exposure time. As stars are dim and the foreground is bright, you have to adjust the camera exposure. Your smartphone does the same automatically. To photograph dimmer stars you'd need an exposure time of several minutes.
stonerlemonblues thank you And I appreciate the response. with all due respect I today just found out that they equipped Apollo 11 I believe with a camera specifically for photographing the stars. I actually heard the video from 1969 I believe it was. but. they still didn't manage to get one pic of them.
flim flam Apollo 16 had an UV Camera and photographer the stars with it. Check, There are pictures on the net.
@flim flam We equipped them with everything, including very high res 70mm still cameras (even under modern standards) and even with a high rez 16mm cinema camera. What we see is blur. Hammer and feather fall at the same time. The only problem: it is all blur and the feather can be, at a push, seen to bounce back twice(!) before the head of the hammer touches the soil. It's nice to say that most of the photos are lost. The same applies to Russian (Soviets) - tons of footage from their lunokhods (lunar rovers) seem to be lost. Very convenient. One day a spacecraft will go near these landings or even land there. It must happen, hopefully. But I no longer believe in justice. Most photos with stars and many videos are only recent. They were never there back in the day. Once again, the arguments of _lost or not released_ are used.
MOUNT HADLEY
W. Who does remember when Apollo 15 landed, by high art and skill,
H. Here on a plain by the Moon's own Apennines, near Hadley Rille?
E. "Ecce Mons Apenninus Lunae!": "Behold MOUNT HADLEY afar!", a chosen Site!
N. Note IRWIN climbing down those coppern-gold rungs to say: "Oh, Boy!...What a Site!"
A. As I remember well those Days, the golden hues of excellence indeed
P. Prevailed when SCOTT did say, "MAN MUST EXPLORE!" to satisfy his need.
O. Onward the Rover drove, on moonscape-fields of football-sized strewn rocks,
L. Laid bare midst curving powdery snow drifts, as SCOTT to IRWIN talks.
L. Likewise JOE ALLEN spoke through microphone as Houston's Voice:
O. "O, Get good rocks as sample stones into gem-bags of choice!"
F. From nearby Crater fills some diamonds in the goldlink necklace!
I. Is not that Rover ride a wondrous tour of Lunar Mystery's Face?
F. From Falcon's landing point upon Palus Putredinis, Marsh of Decay,
T. To exploration's height: sunlit MOUNT HADLEY high, a deep assay.
E. Exclaims JIM IRWIN to DAVE SCOTT, right at the argent Peak upon
E. Egressing by: "DAVE, from whence my "HELP!"? From Houston too, anon:
N. Nostalgic memory in scenic melody now echoes back from lunar hills!
W. When Rock of Genesis: The Gem of expedition's win a Quest fulfills.
A. And Galileo's vindicating test by falcon feather's fall and SCOTT'S hammer too:
S. Seen going down to simultaneous end-gravity field's proven true!
H. Has Hadley's Legacy been fully understood upon Decay's Touchdown?
E. Even properly construed over its own significance to us in town?
R. Resolve to end urban decay-moral decay, pthisis all, and more: all others conquer too!
E. Ever reverse Dekay's effects on U: Behold yon Hadley's Help to You!
I, A.S.K. ( I,Albert Stephen Kundrat) I Ask for anyone to read my Poem here-on!
"ASK not What your Country can do for You, ASK what You can do for your Country!"- President John F, Kennedy
Note : "HELP!" from the Beatle's Album : "HELP! I need somebody's Help, not just anybody's HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP! HELP!.. My Independence seem to vanish in the Haze. Will U please, please HELPMME!
What are those white dots on the black background at 20:30?
Maybe reflection of the sunlight.
It's lens flare. That's where the light bounces back and forth in a lens a few times, creating white spots like that. Most photographers or movie makers try to avoid it. Some (i.e. J.J. Abrams) actually want lens flare. Here's one example of photographic lens flare:
i.ytimg.com/vi/iLo8aMKr7E4/maxresdefault.jpg
19:23how deep should space dirt be? And wouldn't the dirt just float after he tripped or at least not act like Earth's gravity?
the dirt should fall back
Why would the dirt float? Because the moon has 1/6th earths gravity so the dirt falls back to the surface of the moon even when they trip.
@@nebtheweb8885 wouldn't it fall slower at least? That's why they have the heavy boots I thought? ua-cam.com/video/TieuTQDhFm0/v-deo.html
Sounds like an old star trek show.
Pretty darnn close..Just with a bigger budget
"that's just super, UNREAL" 🤣🤣
I can dig it!!!!!!!!!
Right from the beginning of the video, who films the module ?
Jim Irwin
@@rockethead7 From where, at the same speed ?
@@Oaxiboo12
From the lunar module, shortly after the two craft separated. Yes, largely at the same speed (ever so slightly different, not enough to notice).
@@rockethead7 Well, may be. But Something seems wrong ...
@@Oaxiboo12
Well, I don't know what you think is wrong. But, maybe your instinct of "something wrong" is also because the film was taken at only a few frames per second, and played back at normal speed, resulting in everything looking to be going too fast. They aren't actually going that fast over the lunar surface. Think of it as being recorded in slow motion, then played back at normal speed.
We have so much potential with that big rock up there. I really hope (in the name of science) the moon becomes our next hub into the galaxy for the greater good of mankind
I think now we know there is water there is going to make things much more viable.