I’m devostated, that I missed this event! Joscha Bach on a talk in Germany!? Damn! It is always a great pleasure, listening to his extremely intelligent interpretations of our world.
@@e555t66 well, imagine Joscha interviewing Elon Musk, Erik Weinstein, John Carmack, Lee Cronin, Edward Snowden, Richard Dawkins, Roger Penrose, Stephen Wolfram, Douglas Hofstadter...
Support Vector Machine (SVM) is a supervised machine learning algorithm that is used for classification and regression tasks. It works by finding the hyperplane that best separates different classes in the feature space. SVM aims to maximize the margin between the hyperplane and the nearest data points from each class, making it effective for both linearly separable and non-linearly separable data. If you have any specific questions or need more details about SVM, feel free to ask!
I think that there is one underlying principle that we should take into account. All paths are open to us. However, what we have as an absolute basic idea, as an unquestionable iron paradigm, a guideline, a driving force, a maxim, an axiom is: we are looking for the machines that watch over us and our behavior with loving grace.
Great constructive back and forth! Genesis interpretation though speculative rang true with me. We often do not give credit to our ancestors or other life forms for that matter.
I would stand with Joscha and work with him regarding simulation and algorithm instead of hardware, because our brain is hardware with an extremely flexible algorithm, I would love to know what algorithm could be self-ware and human-like intelligent
What is behind the word “understand”? There is an Agent, an entity credited with the ability to understand. Information is involved, and information processing. Information processing “leads” from “not understanding” to “understanding”. There is a "something" that is understood That "something" is coherent in itself, which implies generating a model and validating it. Validation is associated with certainty There is a process associated with the ability to understand; that is, we can speak of “the action of understanding”. All action takes place in the present What is understood, at the same time is learned. Learning is capable of being stored. Eventually, stored learning is likely to be "recalled." The information associated with "understanding" is limited to a specific segment of "reality". In every action of understanding there is an input of information, a "reading of information", information that is part of the aforementioned "segment of reality".
I like the idea of hardware and software as two opposite paths converging toward the mind, but it feels like a dog and his owner trying to meet halfway across a wide river. The first swims, the second uses a speedboat...
Elon needs to hire both of these people and give them lots of money. Joscha should lead the software AI team and Yulia should lead the robotic hardware team. I think that would be the fastest and maybe the only way to achieve fully functional self driving cars and that would lead directly to really useful Teslabots.
This is probably going to be a confrontational take, but I find Bach’s takes to be quite derivative. I hear many others peoples views packaged up and replayed by him when he speaks on a topic but I don’t ever hear anything truly original from him. I’d rather listen to thinkers like Deutsch, LeCun, Chollet and even Wolfram (god forbid).
We know a lot about algebra, and engineering, and materials, but compared to every other field of science what we know about how the brain works is as little as a dog knows about how a car works. They know it moves and they can move inside of it, but a dog has no clue the essence of a car's manufacturing, financing, driver training, supply chain, road rules, etc. We know the brain uses compartments and hormones and synapses but we don't know f all about the emergence of conscious experience which is everything as far as intelligence or emergent organizational self-assembling structures are concerned. We are objectively ignorant of the brain relative to everything else we've studied in the universe. The brain isn't at all we understood, it is just heavily studied but that doesn't mean it's well known or mapped. Most things are well understood by being this heavily studied, but the brain is an anomaly. Just because we've put the effort in doesn't mean we've succeeded. We don't even understand disorders or medications like antidepressants at a mechanical level yet, despite our studies and prescriptions over the past 3 decades. Compare that to any other field, 3 decades is a whole new branch of study most other bodies of science. Machine learning has come farther in 30 years than neurology relative to where it began 30 years ago.
Josha need to stick to AI and leave genesis/religion alone. He completely miss the mark. Genesis is a symbolic pattern that can't be comprehend thru scientific thinking
I’m devostated, that I missed this event! Joscha Bach on a talk in Germany!? Damn! It is always a great pleasure, listening to his extremely intelligent interpretations of our world.
just thought the same. Deutsches Museum is like 12 minutes from my house, damn
Same here. Frankfurt is just a few hours away, and this event would definitely have been worthwhile.
Joscha, why don't you have your own channel where you interview people, like Lex Friedman?! You are a great interviewer!
Because he's busy
He would be so bored if he did that. I wish there were better people to interview him.
@@e555t66 well, imagine Joscha interviewing Elon Musk, Erik Weinstein, John Carmack, Lee Cronin, Edward Snowden, Richard Dawkins, Roger Penrose, Stephen Wolfram, Douglas Hofstadter...
@@mgg4338 If he interviews them it would be unusable for us.
I just want him to have a standing invitation on lex every six months.
Pretty cool presentations. Love how both fight with constructive and clever arguments in the discussions in the second part. Great discourse
Support Vector Machine (SVM) is a supervised machine learning algorithm that is used for classification and regression tasks. It works by finding the hyperplane that best separates different classes in the feature space. SVM aims to maximize the margin between the hyperplane and the nearest data points from each class, making it effective for both linearly separable and non-linearly separable data. If you have any specific questions or need more details about SVM, feel free to ask!
I think that there is one underlying principle
that we should take into account.
All paths are open to us.
However, what we have as an absolute basic
idea, as an unquestionable iron paradigm,
a guideline, a driving force, a maxim, an
axiom is:
we are looking for the machines that watch
over us and our behavior with loving grace.
I love this talk It shows the inherent biases of Josch Bach. She makes a perfect point here: 44:19
She is much deeper in the research it seems
That lecture theatre looks so chill
what is on joscha´s neck?
Something to hold another something similar to a mask
@@randompal9828 What?
It's a face shield holder. You place a plastic shield in it to protect from bees. Joscha is extraordinarily phobic of bees.
Respiray Wearable Air Purifier
His head.
59:37 eerily similar facial expression to Bach:s
ADHD meds
Great constructive back and forth! Genesis interpretation though speculative rang true with me. We often do not give credit to our ancestors or other life forms for that matter.
I would stand with Joscha and work with him regarding simulation and algorithm instead of hardware,
because our brain is hardware with an extremely flexible algorithm,
I would love to know what algorithm could be self-ware and human-like intelligent
Nested feedback loops of regulations.
our brain isn't hardware, its liveware. The physical properties of our brain are constantly being changed which is incomparable to how computers work.
@1:08:15... ya?
What is behind the word “understand”?
There is an Agent, an entity credited with the ability to understand.
Information is involved, and information processing. Information processing “leads” from “not understanding” to “understanding”.
There is a "something" that is understood
That "something" is coherent in itself, which implies generating a model and validating it.
Validation is associated with certainty
There is a process associated with the ability to understand; that is, we can speak of “the action of understanding”. All action takes place in the present
What is understood, at the same time is learned. Learning is capable of being stored. Eventually, stored learning is likely to be "recalled."
The information associated with "understanding" is limited to a specific segment of "reality".
In every action of understanding there is an input of information, a "reading of information", information that is part of the aforementioned "segment of reality".
This is so goddamn interesting.
The fact that the Lists on the Screen started with (1) and not with (0) was a huge missed oportunity
51:10 brutal.
Do you know what kind of simulations Joscha is referring to writing at that time stamp?
34:37
AC broke?
Wow, Joscha in the different level thhan Yulia. Like the rest that he talks to. Amazing video, tnx!!
I like the idea of hardware and software as two opposite paths converging toward the mind, but it feels like a dog and his owner trying to meet halfway across a wide river. The first swims, the second uses a speedboat...
wow
Elon needs to hire both of these people and give them lots of money. Joscha should lead the software AI team and Yulia should lead the robotic hardware team. I think that would be the fastest and maybe the only way to achieve fully functional self driving cars and that would lead directly to really useful Teslabots.
What software has Joscha written that would qualify him for such a role?
This is probably going to be a confrontational take, but I find Bach’s takes to be quite derivative. I hear many others peoples views packaged up and replayed by him when he speaks on a topic but I don’t ever hear anything truly original from him. I’d rather listen to thinkers like Deutsch, LeCun, Chollet and even Wolfram (god forbid).
disney universe 3
1
We know a lot about algebra, and engineering, and materials, but compared to every other field of science what we know about how the brain works is as little as a dog knows about how a car works. They know it moves and they can move inside of it, but a dog has no clue the essence of a car's manufacturing, financing, driver training, supply chain, road rules, etc.
We know the brain uses compartments and hormones and synapses but we don't know f all about the emergence of conscious experience which is everything as far as intelligence or emergent organizational self-assembling structures are concerned.
We are objectively ignorant of the brain relative to everything else we've studied in the universe. The brain isn't at all we understood, it is just heavily studied but that doesn't mean it's well known or mapped. Most things are well understood by being this heavily studied, but the brain is an anomaly. Just because we've put the effort in doesn't mean we've succeeded. We don't even understand disorders or medications like antidepressants at a mechanical level yet, despite our studies and prescriptions over the past 3 decades. Compare that to any other field, 3 decades is a whole new branch of study most other bodies of science. Machine learning has come farther in 30 years than neurology relative to where it began 30 years ago.
Josha need to stick to AI and leave genesis/religion alone. He completely miss the mark. Genesis is a symbolic pattern that can't be comprehend thru scientific thinking
Yes, it's funny that he gives so much importance to something written by cave people...
🙄 y’all would make terrible scientists
Nonsense… He’s right to ridicule clearly idiotic ideas.
14:46
lmfao wtf the way he drinks