Considering how much Kimba content had been had made in over fifty episodes and multiple movies, I'm not too surprised that there are similarities. Though overall, most these two properties have in common are Lions, Africa and dead fathers. You should check out Simba: King of Beasts, which came even before the Kimba comics and it also has similarities with Tezuka's creation. Hmmm, suspicious.
Vintage anime has inspired the next generation of Disney And Bambi was one thing tezuka was responsible for and if it wasn't for kimba there would never have been a Simba
1.Yes it is rip off 2.Some Westerners after 1997 Made the wrong comparison by add including the kimba1997 in comparison with the Lion King 1994. But that didn't change the previous truth anyway. 3.YMS video are logic fallacy 4.Kimba looks more like Hamlet than lion king 1994 5.from4. Disney's excuses are absurd.
@@Enguerrand6 1.He doesn't have a clear definition of what rip off and coincidence are. So he could deny all the evidence. Does coincidence mean it happened more than 3 times?rip off means it has to be 100% the same? 2.Making Error comparison video of Westerners After 1997 doesn't mean it's not true. Bad proof doesn't always mean proof is wrong. this is logic fallacy 3.When the house has more assets than thieves can steal. What thieves don't take is not proof that theft never happened. But the YMS logic seems to say that theft never happens if the thief can't steal it all. 4.If someone intends to copy 100% of Superman, the YMS logic will say it's common trope of tales about people with magical powers. Even for people who are sane What he drew was an imitation of everything Superman. And no copyright court anywhere in the world listens to this moronic argument. 5.He deliberately skipped the evidence that did not support his own bias. to mislead the kimba and slander Tezuka . For example, it is not to say that the group that has been protesting the story since 1994 when the Lion King aired around the world. and the group that made a video comparison error after 1997 was a different group. but speaking as if both groups were the same group to destroy the credibility of the first group. 6. From 1 to 5, he misdiagnosed and saw no similarity at the plot level of the two stories.
@@Enguerrand6 "1. He does, actually, make a difference between the two if you watched until the end of the video" Good then If he has a definition, What is the definition of rip off and his coincidence? And you don't have to make claims like "You've got to go see it." I've seen it and he doesn't have a definition. So now the one who has to tell me the definition of YMS is you. Explain what his definition is. In case he still insists on the conclusion that the Lion King doesn't rip off kimba, then his definition of rip off means it must be 100% the same, right? and if not, he would come to such a conclusion by How can you just talk about differences as an excuse to ignore the similarities between the two? including the definition of the word "Coincidence" if his definition of this word is the same as for a sane person who knows that a coincidence never happens more than three times. Because that will no longer be a coincidence. He certainly didn't come to the conclusion that all the similarities were just coincidences. Because of the coincidence that the Lion King 1994 is similar to Kimba, there are more than 10 things. 2."YMS points that out but also critics other sources on the controversy, like Fred Patten. Other wrong points are discussed in the video" This doesn't change the fact that I'm saying this is logic fallacy. . Bad proof doesn't always mean proof is wrong. And who made such false proofs? It's westerners like you after 1997. which YMS now do the same as those people do. They make wrong comparisons, and YMS uses the wrong logic and misrepresents the error. 3."You don't understand the point YMS makes: since Kimba is diluted over 3000 minutes, it is bound to have been through so many stories and character in the Kenyan jungle that similarities will always be found" Of course, I don't understand his logic fallacy because I'm not a bias. evil like him .He had not discovered anything new in this regard. He just took the evidence the police found. Let's reconsider with a bias. and said that the thief didn't steal because the house was too big for thieves to steal. kimba has more episodes and a Disney movie finished in two hours. They had no way of getting all of them. Have you ever seen a Disney movie in a theater that followed everything from the original without having to modify it first? And sorry idiot… Africa is big enough to make a lot of movies about the creatures without being as "as much" as Kimba as the Lion King. You can use his own example. For example, a black and white movie called Simba 1928. and the 1940 Simba comic Is the plot as much as Kimba as the Lion King? no . The ghost and the darkness 1996 . or even disney's lion guard 2015, which is made into a long series with many episodes. It doesn't look like Kimba as much as the Lion King 1994. So the excuse that if Disney made a cartoon about African lions it would inevitably come out like Kimba. It's a naive conclusion. bias and fallacy " we need to look at the differences that make the Lion King unique and different from Kimba, which YMS achieve by analysing the characters and story arcs throughout the viedo." actually what you said is " We need to be a fool because we don't discover anything new so we Re-consider all evidence with logic fallacy" Considering all his characters It's based on logic fallacy. "The same means not the same Because Disney customizes it so it's not a rip off." I'm not going to talk about the resemblance of the characters because it's already obvious even to a kindergartener. Even the main plot is the same. Lion King 1994 It's nothing but Kimba's subplot about animal conflict. and completely eliminated the main plot about humans. If you've actually read or watched Kimba, you'll understand what I mean. But unfortunately you didn't watch. So you're just the 100th brainless parrot I've met. And this is Kimba's story when the humans were taken out. "The baby lion finds his father killed and bears the burden of ruling his father's kingdom, including the doctrine of coexistence, not excessive hunting of carnivores. as well as facing the challenge of a one-eyed rival lion who is his father's enemy. Growing up, he leaves the forest and finds his father's rival lion violating his own rules and trying to take his girlfriend as his wife. He fights and wins, and has a baby with his girlfriend." This is just a subplot of Kim. And it doesn't end here But this is all of the Lion King 1994 main plot . And if you argue that Scar isn't looking to take Nala becomes a wife You can try find this deleted scene. The moment it happened was at the same time that the main lion left the forest. And this is not a playful scene that they thought for fun. They prepared it so well that they even wrote the script and composed the music. 4. "If I were to take 100% of Superman, I would have to prove it's not a rip-off by pointing out what makes my superhero different in a meaningful way." If you try to copy 100%, you're a thief and that's rip off, and the rest of your sentence is shameful for trying to cover up your crime. And this does not disprove my argument that The consideration of YMS is Logic fallacy. My example of plagiarizing Superman is to say that YMS said Disney wasn't plagiarizing, claiming that everything in the world existed before. And every new thing must imitate the former. So why do we need a copyright or intellectual property protection court then? Because we humans are not as retarded as YMS. We don't let thieves commit crimes because they are wrong. Even though there were thieves in the world before that. Do I have to sit and explain to you how much it would be wrong to copy what was before? This is a basic matter of common sense that a westerner like you should know better. But it becomes confusing because you don't have a clear definition of "how much" if you consider it a rip off, coincidence or inspiration, you mix it all up and secretly change the definition to your liking. " if the story is different enough so that's is seperate from the origina" but the reality is The plot is no different. look at No.3 5."He clearly talks about the Japanes cartoonists petition in 1994 in the video by saying that Disney should've acknowledged Tezuka's influence over the Lion King. The video doesn't destroy the credibility of Tezuka or Japan in this video or in his editing highlights, why would you think that?" No he didn't say it clearly. He ranted about the wrong video comparison, but didn't say it was a separate group. and the ignorant listener understands that This protest took place after 1997. not before 1994 . And everyone who protested "didn't watch" Kimba, which clearly created the misconception that the people who protested since 1994 didn't even watch Kimba. Deliberately neglecting to speak is enough to create misunderstandings. You're the one who can't see his vile strategy. It took YMS to say that it was all just the work of the era for 5 seconds. but spent the next 15 minutes ranting about how he painted black people like he had drawn in those days. And as a result, people misunderstood Tezuka as racist. And did he come to be interested in correcting the mistake he made? No, skin color is such a delicate matter in the Western world, there's no way he's unaware of it. but he still did. And he keeps making new videos accusing Kimba like "YMS on Why Kimba The White Lion Is Offensive" I'll give you another example of his vile strategy. He said that Tezuka's son did not agree with this. But if he did his research as well as he claims and studied Japanes cartoonists petition in 1994. How could he not know that one of the 488 Japanese leaders signed the protest Make an open letter to Disney and it was clearly stated there .that Son Tezuka's attitude was just a normal Japanese etiquette mask. Have you seen it? that he deliberately misrepresented the evidence by presenting only partially supporting his own erroneous conclusion. 6." At the beginning of the video he clearly says that he used to think that Lion King could be a rip-off of Kimba but then he watched the show and delivered 10h+ of content to show us what he learned." off topic I don't care what he thinks "before" or "after." What I do care about is his final wrong conclusion. Even your own thoughts are fragmented. and no point And this is the result of why you are easily brainwashed by his 2-hour video. Which was destroyed by reading the fact that I typed for a few minutes.
Considering how much Kimba content had been had made in over fifty episodes and multiple movies, I'm not too surprised that there are similarities. Though overall, most these two properties have in common are Lions, Africa and dead fathers.
You should check out Simba: King of Beasts, which came even before the Kimba comics and it also has similarities with Tezuka's creation. Hmmm, suspicious.
Your argument was destroy From your own example
They only lie when they benefit from it, clearly those employees lied
Vintage anime has inspired the next generation of Disney
And Bambi was one thing tezuka was responsible for and if it wasn't for kimba there would never have been a Simba
1.Yes it is rip off
2.Some Westerners after 1997 Made the wrong comparison by add including the kimba1997 in comparison with the Lion King 1994. But that didn't change the previous truth anyway.
3.YMS video are logic fallacy
4.Kimba looks more like Hamlet than lion king 1994
5.from4. Disney's excuses are absurd.
@@Enguerrand6 1.He doesn't have a clear definition of what rip off and coincidence are. So he could deny all the evidence. Does coincidence mean it happened more than 3 times?rip off means it has to be 100% the same?
2.Making Error comparison video of Westerners After 1997 doesn't mean it's not true. Bad proof doesn't always mean proof is wrong. this is logic fallacy
3.When the house has more assets than thieves can steal. What thieves don't take is not proof that theft never happened.
But the YMS logic seems to say that theft never happens if the thief can't steal it all.
4.If someone intends to copy 100% of Superman, the YMS logic will say it's common trope of tales about people with magical powers. Even for people who are sane What he drew was an imitation of everything Superman. And no copyright court anywhere in the world listens to this moronic argument.
5.He deliberately skipped the evidence that did not support his own bias. to mislead the kimba and slander Tezuka . For example, it is not to say that the group that has been protesting the story since 1994 when the Lion King aired around the world. and the group that made a video comparison error after 1997 was a different group. but speaking as if both groups were the same group to destroy the credibility of the first group.
6. From 1 to 5, he misdiagnosed and saw no similarity at the plot level of the two stories.
@@Enguerrand6 "1. He does, actually, make a difference between the two if you watched until the end of the video"
Good then If he has a definition, What is the definition of rip off and his coincidence?
And you don't have to make claims like "You've got to go see it." I've seen it and he doesn't have a definition. So now the one who has to tell me the definition of YMS is you. Explain what his definition is. In case he still insists on the conclusion that the Lion King doesn't rip off kimba, then his definition of rip off means it must be 100% the same, right? and if not, he would come to such a conclusion by How can you just talk about differences as an excuse to ignore the similarities between the two? including the definition of the word "Coincidence" if his definition of this word is the same as for a sane person who knows that a coincidence never happens more than three times. Because that will no longer be a coincidence. He certainly didn't come to the conclusion that all the similarities were just coincidences. Because of the coincidence that the Lion King 1994 is similar to Kimba, there are more than 10 things.
2."YMS points that out but also critics other sources on the controversy, like Fred Patten. Other wrong points are discussed in the video"
This doesn't change the fact that I'm saying this is logic fallacy. . Bad proof doesn't always mean proof is wrong. And who made such false proofs? It's westerners like you after 1997. which YMS now do the same as those people do. They make wrong comparisons, and YMS uses the wrong logic and misrepresents the error.
3."You don't understand the point YMS makes: since Kimba is diluted over 3000 minutes, it is bound to have been through so many stories and character in the Kenyan jungle that similarities will always be found"
Of course, I don't understand his logic fallacy because I'm not a bias. evil like him .He had not discovered anything new in this regard. He just took the evidence the police found. Let's reconsider with a bias. and said that the thief didn't steal because the house was too big for thieves to steal. kimba has more episodes and a Disney movie finished in two hours. They had no way of getting all of them. Have you ever seen a Disney movie in a theater that followed everything from the original without having to modify it first? And sorry idiot… Africa is big enough to make a lot of movies about the creatures without being as "as much" as Kimba as the Lion King. You can use his own example. For example, a black and white movie called Simba 1928. and the 1940 Simba comic Is the plot as much as Kimba as the Lion King? no . The ghost and the darkness 1996 . or even disney's lion guard 2015, which is made into a long series with many episodes. It doesn't look like Kimba as much as the Lion King 1994. So the excuse that if Disney made a cartoon about African lions it would inevitably come out like Kimba. It's a naive conclusion. bias and fallacy
" we need to look at the differences that make the Lion King unique and different from Kimba, which YMS achieve by analysing the characters and story arcs throughout the viedo."
actually what you said is " We need to be a fool because we don't discover anything new so we Re-consider all evidence with logic fallacy" Considering all his characters It's based on logic fallacy. "The same means not the same Because Disney customizes it so it's not a rip off." I'm not going to talk about the resemblance of the characters because it's already obvious even to a kindergartener. Even the main plot is the same. Lion King 1994 It's nothing but Kimba's subplot about animal conflict. and completely eliminated the main plot about humans. If you've actually read or watched Kimba, you'll understand what I mean. But unfortunately you didn't watch. So you're just the 100th brainless parrot I've met. And this is Kimba's story when the humans were taken out. "The baby lion finds his father killed and bears the burden of ruling his father's kingdom, including the doctrine of coexistence, not excessive hunting of carnivores. as well as facing the challenge of a one-eyed rival lion who is his father's enemy. Growing up, he leaves the forest and finds his father's rival lion violating his own rules and trying to take his girlfriend as his wife. He fights and wins, and has a baby with his girlfriend." This is just a subplot of Kim. And it doesn't end here But this is all of the Lion King 1994 main plot . And if you argue that Scar isn't looking to take Nala becomes a wife You can try find this deleted scene. The moment it happened was at the same time that the main lion left the forest. And this is not a playful scene that they thought for fun. They prepared it so well that they even wrote the script and composed the music.
4. "If I were to take 100% of Superman, I would have to prove it's not a rip-off by pointing out what makes my superhero different in a meaningful way."
If you try to copy 100%, you're a thief and that's rip off, and the rest of your sentence is shameful for trying to cover up your crime. And this does not disprove my argument that The consideration of YMS is Logic fallacy. My example of plagiarizing Superman is to say that YMS said Disney wasn't plagiarizing, claiming that everything in the world existed before. And every new thing must imitate the former. So why do we need a copyright or intellectual property protection court then? Because we humans are not as retarded as YMS. We don't let thieves commit crimes because they are wrong. Even though there were thieves in the world before that. Do I have to sit and explain to you how much it would be wrong to copy what was before? This is a basic matter of common sense that a westerner like you should know better. But it becomes confusing because you don't have a clear definition of "how much" if you consider it a rip off, coincidence or inspiration, you mix it all up and secretly change the definition to your liking.
" if the story is different enough so that's is seperate from the origina" but the reality is The plot is no different. look at No.3
5."He clearly talks about the Japanes cartoonists petition in 1994 in the video by saying that Disney should've acknowledged Tezuka's influence over the Lion King. The video doesn't destroy the credibility of Tezuka or Japan in this video or in his editing highlights, why would you think that?" No he didn't say it clearly. He ranted about the wrong video comparison, but didn't say it was a separate group. and the ignorant listener understands that This protest took place after 1997. not before 1994 . And everyone who protested "didn't watch" Kimba, which clearly created the misconception that the people who protested since 1994 didn't even watch Kimba. Deliberately neglecting to speak is enough to create misunderstandings. You're the one who can't see his vile strategy. It took YMS to say that it was all just the work of the era for 5 seconds. but spent the next 15 minutes ranting about how he painted black people like he had drawn in those days. And as a result, people misunderstood Tezuka as racist. And did he come to be interested in correcting the mistake he made? No, skin color is such a delicate matter in the Western world, there's no way he's unaware of it. but he still did. And he keeps making new videos accusing Kimba like "YMS on Why Kimba The White Lion Is Offensive" I'll give you another example of his vile strategy. He said that Tezuka's son did not agree with this. But if he did his research as well as he claims and studied Japanes cartoonists petition in 1994. How could he not know that one of the 488 Japanese leaders signed the protest Make an open letter to Disney and it was clearly stated there .that Son Tezuka's attitude was just a normal Japanese etiquette mask. Have you seen it? that he deliberately misrepresented the evidence by presenting only partially supporting his own erroneous conclusion.
6." At the beginning of the video he clearly says that he used to think that Lion King could be a rip-off of Kimba but then he watched the show and delivered 10h+ of content to show us what he learned."
off topic I don't care what he thinks "before" or "after." What I do care about is his final wrong conclusion. Even your own thoughts are fragmented. and no point And this is the result of why you are easily brainwashed by his 2-hour video. Which was destroyed by reading the fact that I typed for a few minutes.
Cope
@@GamingAnimator1 It's you who never watch kimba. and never read my post that destroy YMS logic fallacy .