So let me get this straight, these 4 kids decided to get a four bedroom house that cost their entire paycheck for all four of them on their own accord. When in reality they could have doubled up in bedrooms for a cheaper house. Got 15% (possibly 35%) in sponsorship money because of the Organization they joined (100T) but didnt do anything to get it themselves but thought they deserved more. Including 2500 for content creation. Had high tier creators they could have asked for advice, help, or scheduling that only lived a few miles away. And on top of that Nadeshot, after being told not to sign them, stuck their neck out for them... And then this man-child has the audacity to say 60k a year wasn't enough for a base pay and he was mistreated after only streaming 40 hours a month while I work 40 hours in 3 days 😂 and he thinks he was done wrong? Only a 12 year old wouldn't understand the monumental chance he was given.
And yet some people only see the headline... "15% share on sponsorship? 100T predator!" Also charlie the Penguinz0 guy covered this story but he got that share issue completely wrong. He's one of the guys who only saw the headline and didn't bother digging deeper. 15% is the starting point which is absolutely fair because that was already on top of their salary and exposure. PLUS the almost unlimited and invaluable resource they have under 100T. Anyway, Charlie putting that perspective on the share is seriously misleading as he's a top YT creator and has a massive audience who now only sees 100T as predatory org..
Nadeshot did the exact same thing screwing Nickmercs out of promised equity in 100Thieves once Nick hit certain incentives and accomplishments. It's well documented. Nadeshot has shaaady business ethics
I'm fully on Nickmercs side. I was a big optic fan growing up. Watched scump/nade my whole life basically. Nickmercs DEFINITELY helped start 100T and deserved equity. But scooter braun convinced nadeshot to cut out everyone that didnt have equity in writing. Very very shady but the 2 stories arent comparable. The mob didnt start 100T, they weren't there in the beginning. They agreed to the contracts they signed, then they were fired for poor performance. Now froste bitching on twitter. Its just not the same at all. You are using an old headline to form your opinion on a new scenario. Im not a big fan of nade anymore but everything he said was facts.
@@chroniccomplainer3792 I didn't even listen to nades explanation lol I don't give him my views anymore. Everything you said though sounds spot on.. appreciate you brining me back down to reality. Nades just dead to me after screwing mercs that badly.. guess I'm still bitter😂
@@jameshagan355 im still bitter too 😂😂😂 but all the twitter stuff on this one points to me wanting to defend nade. These mob guys said they couldnt live 15mins away and wanted to live right next door to the creator mansion. Spent all their money living luxurious LA lives, and they werent profitable for the company. Really hard sell
So let me get this straight, these 4 kids decided to get a four bedroom house that cost their entire paycheck for all four of them on their own accord. When in reality they could have doubled up in bedrooms for a cheaper house.
Got 15% (possibly 35%) in sponsorship money because of the Organization they joined (100T) but didnt do anything to get it themselves but thought they deserved more. Including 2500 for content creation.
Had high tier creators they could have asked for advice, help, or scheduling that only lived a few miles away. And on top of that Nadeshot, after being told not to sign them, stuck their neck out for them...
And then this man-child has the audacity to say 60k a year wasn't enough for a base pay and he was mistreated after only streaming 40 hours a month while I work 40 hours in 3 days 😂 and he thinks he was done wrong? Only a 12 year old wouldn't understand the monumental chance he was given.
And yet some people only see the headline... "15% share on sponsorship? 100T predator!"
Also charlie the Penguinz0 guy covered this story but he got that share issue completely wrong. He's one of the guys who only saw the headline and didn't bother digging deeper.
15% is the starting point which is absolutely fair because that was already on top of their salary and exposure. PLUS the almost unlimited and invaluable resource they have under 100T.
Anyway, Charlie putting that perspective on the share is seriously misleading as he's a top YT creator and has a massive audience who now only sees 100T as predatory org..
Thanks for the nice breakdown👍🏻
Nadeshot did the exact same thing screwing Nickmercs out of promised equity in 100Thieves once Nick hit certain incentives and accomplishments. It's well documented. Nadeshot has shaaady business ethics
I'm fully on Nickmercs side. I was a big optic fan growing up. Watched scump/nade my whole life basically. Nickmercs DEFINITELY helped start 100T and deserved equity. But scooter braun convinced nadeshot to cut out everyone that didnt have equity in writing. Very very shady but the 2 stories arent comparable. The mob didnt start 100T, they weren't there in the beginning. They agreed to the contracts they signed, then they were fired for poor performance. Now froste bitching on twitter. Its just not the same at all. You are using an old headline to form your opinion on a new scenario. Im not a big fan of nade anymore but everything he said was facts.
@@chroniccomplainer3792 I didn't even listen to nades explanation lol I don't give him my views anymore. Everything you said though sounds spot on.. appreciate you brining me back down to reality. Nades just dead to me after screwing mercs that badly.. guess I'm still bitter😂
@@jameshagan355 im still bitter too 😂😂😂 but all the twitter stuff on this one points to me wanting to defend nade. These mob guys said they couldnt live 15mins away and wanted to live right next door to the creator mansion. Spent all their money living luxurious LA lives, and they werent profitable for the company. Really hard sell