Fundamental Theorem of Finitely Generated Abelian Groups -- Abstract Algebra Examples 16

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 кві 2023
  • ⭐Support the channel⭐
    Patreon: / michaelpennmath
    Merch: teespring.com/stores/michael-...
    My amazon shop: www.amazon.com/shop/michaelpenn
    🟢 Discord: / discord
    ⭐my other channels⭐
    Main Channel: / michaelpennmath
    non-math podcast: / @thepennpavpodcast7878
    ⭐My Links⭐
    Personal Website: www.michael-penn.net
    Instagram: / melp2718
    Randolph College Math: www.randolphcollege.edu/mathem...
    Research Gate profile: www.researchgate.net/profile/...
    Google Scholar profile: scholar.google.com/citations?...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 8

  • @DeepSpace145
    @DeepSpace145 Рік тому

    Great teacher, thank you Michael for this great educational project ... wish you the best !

  • @abigailnewhof8204
    @abigailnewhof8204 4 місяці тому +1

    Are the four possible abelian groups of order 450 not isomorphic to each other? I see each one can be isomorphic to multiple different groups by combining groups whose p values are relatively prime. But Z2 x Z9 x Z25 is NOT isomorphic to Z2 x Z2 x Z3 x Z25?

    • @alegal695
      @alegal695 2 місяці тому

      First question: they are not isomorphic
      Second question: the groups in your question are not isomorphic because they have different order (the first one has order 450, the second one has order 300).

  • @humbledb4jesus
    @humbledb4jesus Рік тому +1

    the fundamental theorem of me getting completely lost in the first minute of learning about finitely generated abelian groups...
    all you need now is to add prime number modulus theory and i have found the fundamental theorem of being completely incapable of comprehending it...
    who would have thought getting an astrophysics degree would be easier...

  • @sylowlover
    @sylowlover 9 місяців тому

    Doesn't the theorem at the end apply to any finite non-abelian p-group?

  • @schweinmachtbree1013
    @schweinmachtbree1013 Рік тому

    A slick way to prove 9:31 is to go by contrapositive: if H and K are nonisomorphic then they have different "fundamental forms", and then their products with the "fundamental form" of G are still different so G×H and G×K are nonisomorphic

    • @bjornfeuerbacher5514
      @bjornfeuerbacher5514 9 місяців тому

      What does ""fundamental form" mean here? Also, why does your proof only work for finitely generated abelian groups, but not for others?

    • @schweinmachtbree1013
      @schweinmachtbree1013 9 місяців тому +1

      ​@@bjornfeuerbacher5514 By "fundamental form" I mean "canonical form given by the fundamental theorem of finitely generated abelian groups" (so we need the abelian groups to be finitely generated for the theorem to apply)