Orthogonality and Orthonormality

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 лип 2024
  • We know that the word orthogonal is kind of like the word perpendicular. It implies that two vectors have an angle of ninety degrees or half pi radians between them. But this term means much more than this, as we can have orthogonal matrices, or entire subspaces that are orthogonal to one another. Beyond this, we must understand the term orthonormal, and why orthonormal sets of vectors are important. Let's check it out!
    Script by Howard Whittle
    Watch the whole Mathematics playlist: bit.ly/ProfDaveMath
    Classical Physics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDavePhysics1
    Modern Physics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDavePhysics2
    General Chemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveGenChem
    Organic Chemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveOrgChem
    Biochemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveBiochem
    Biology Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveBio
    EMAIL► ProfessorDaveExplains@gmail.com
    PATREON► / professordaveexplains
    Check out "Is This Wi-Fi Organic?", my book on disarming pseudoscience!
    Amazon: amzn.to/2HtNpVH
    Bookshop: bit.ly/39cKADM
    Barnes and Noble: bit.ly/3pUjmrn
    Book Depository: bit.ly/3aOVDlT

КОМЕНТАРІ • 73

  • @pkasb90
    @pkasb90 4 роки тому +160

    I must say your lecture supercedes those in higher institutions.

  • @isxp
    @isxp 3 роки тому +45

    Good god, I wish I found this 8 weeks ago. The drop date for classes is the 30th. I ended up with 6% on my first midterm in Mathematical Physics. This class will haunt till the day I die. I'll probably know this material better than any of the classes I've taken, as I'll likely obsess over it for months.

  • @lingwaili1203
    @lingwaili1203 3 роки тому +15

    Thank you so much! Professor Dave explains clearly so I can finally understand orthogonal

  • @ddiverr
    @ddiverr 4 роки тому +10

    clean, informative, and concise video, thanks guy

  • @missghani8646
    @missghani8646 3 роки тому +9

    can't thank you enough for this clear explaination

  • @tadabae
    @tadabae 3 роки тому +67

    my final exam is in 15 minutes and i stumbled across this channel. he explains this so clearly!! i wish i found this channel earlier omg

  • @bluefenix1457
    @bluefenix1457 Місяць тому

    This explained it so well for me, you spoke clearly and didn't do messy sentences, and even paused after every sentence to process it 👏👏👏👏👏👏

  • @janakamohotti
    @janakamohotti 2 роки тому +2

    Brilliant explanation!!! ❤️

  • @user-qv8mr8pe3i
    @user-qv8mr8pe3i 2 роки тому +2

    thanks for awesome explanations!!!

  • @jainpravachan650
    @jainpravachan650 3 роки тому +3

    Thanks sir.... wonderful lecture

  • @jisaburo198
    @jisaburo198 3 роки тому +1

    EXCELLENT videos! Thank you so much

  • @ayazohdy6221
    @ayazohdy6221 5 років тому +26

    Professor Dave explains 😂💕

  • @rodab3546
    @rodab3546 4 роки тому +3

    you explain so good

  • @manishbhatia2724
    @manishbhatia2724 3 роки тому +1

    Beautiful Explanation

  • @JoseLopez-op7sq
    @JoseLopez-op7sq 2 місяці тому

    A lot of good information in one short video; good overview.

  • @Dixxi91
    @Dixxi91 2 роки тому

    Very good explanation, thank you

  • @raihansk5971
    @raihansk5971 5 років тому +2

    Amazing!!.........Explaination is awesome.....

  • @mehuladhrit7883
    @mehuladhrit7883 3 роки тому +1

    Very nicely taught...

  • @Bruhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
    @Bruhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh 2 роки тому +4

    3:05 "four SQUARED plus two SQUARED plus negative one squared" lol im dying and good vid overall

  • @Robert-gr1cl
    @Robert-gr1cl 3 місяці тому

    such good explanations, thanks

  • @apythonprogrammer7877
    @apythonprogrammer7877 2 місяці тому

    This really helped me understand LLM model quantization just a tiny bit better

  • @blakeelzinga1168
    @blakeelzinga1168 3 роки тому

    Thank you for this video

  • @tknam3278
    @tknam3278 2 роки тому +1

    This is perfect!

  • @adefisanadedotun797
    @adefisanadedotun797 2 місяці тому

    Very understood
    Thank you

  • @user-so7gh7gd4v
    @user-so7gh7gd4v 2 місяці тому

    Amazing explanation

  • @suvarnamanojsingh
    @suvarnamanojsingh 3 роки тому

    thanks that was helpful

  • @mona5112
    @mona5112 3 роки тому +4

    Hello Professor and Thanks for your great explanations.
    I was wondering why do not we have something called orthonormal matrices ??
    and think orthogonal matrices are more like orthonormal ones!! :))

  • @lamdawave
    @lamdawave 2 роки тому

    Good video. One question: If a square matrix has orthogonal column vectors. its inverse is not equal to its transpose. what should we call this type of matrices?

  • @mcalkis5771
    @mcalkis5771 2 роки тому

    Could someone elaborate on the weight functions? Is it just a correction factor so that a function can be orthogonal with respect to another?

  • @jds189
    @jds189 4 роки тому

    what happened to the visuals clarifications? its been primarily plug and chug for most of linear algebra..

  • @umehmoses8118
    @umehmoses8118 Рік тому

    I love the professor 😁

  • @colingillespie7635
    @colingillespie7635 3 роки тому

    The intro alone earns my like

  • @banderallogmany1912
    @banderallogmany1912 3 роки тому +3

    3:52 I didn't get how the length becomes 1!

  • @deathworld5253
    @deathworld5253 5 років тому +3

    Isn't orthagonality defined by having the dot product equal to null element in Euclidian space?

    • @yogsothoth2194
      @yogsothoth2194 5 років тому +1

      I think null just means nothing; or in mathematical terms 0 . So yeah you're probably right

  • @asifnahyankabir7747
    @asifnahyankabir7747 2 роки тому +1

    Amazing Professor! One day if God wills I'll come to meet you!

  • @kidatheart4975
    @kidatheart4975 3 роки тому +5

    I'm confused on the orthonormal part. There are 2 conditions for orthonormal vectors: (1) orthogonal; and (2) the length is 1. But the example on 2:56, the length is not 1 that negate the conditions of being an orthonormal. Can you please elaborate that part? Thanks

    • @criclal1787
      @criclal1787 3 роки тому +4

      Those vectors displayed at 2:56 are not orthonormal, we have converted them both to unit vectors and made them orthonormal thus.

    • @wealthy_concept1313
      @wealthy_concept1313 2 роки тому

      @@criclal1787 but if that's the case it means any vector can be converted to orthonormal at will ?

    • @MuffinsAPlenty
      @MuffinsAPlenty Рік тому +1

      @@wealthy_concept1313 Any set of vectors can be "normalized" (meaning to make the lengths of all of the vectors 1). This does not, at all, change the angles between any of the vectors.
      The Gram-Schmidt Process (the next video in the playlist) shows us that any _linearly independent_ set of vectors can be made orthogonal without changing the span of the set.
      Taken together, given any basis, we can always find an orthonormal basis by first using the Gram-Schmidt process to make the basis orthogonal without changing its span, and then we can "normalize" the orthogonal set to make it orthonormal.

  • @ManojKumar-cj7oj
    @ManojKumar-cj7oj 3 роки тому +1

    Inverse of orthogonal matrix = tranpose of matrix

  • @dgormley
    @dgormley 2 роки тому +1

    Please teach at my university.

  • @kryptoid2568
    @kryptoid2568 3 роки тому

    sir, the inner product notation reminds me of bra-ket notation

  • @kaanylmaz1008
    @kaanylmaz1008 2 роки тому

    eyw reis

  • @prakashraj4519
    @prakashraj4519 3 роки тому

    video on caley hamilton

  • @srinityapadma5125
    @srinityapadma5125 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much Sir.../\

  • @desrepeerc206
    @desrepeerc206 2 роки тому

    3:23 Nice frankenbiting skills xD

  • @glennveniceaboy8876
    @glennveniceaboy8876 3 роки тому

    your convention for magnitude of a vector is a bit confusing because the single bar on both sides is usually for absolute value, maybe you should've used double bars for it
    anyways, i learned a lot, thanks!

    • @carultch
      @carultch Рік тому

      Absolute value and magnitude of a vector have so much in common, they might as well use the same notation. I thought the double bars on both sides was completely unnecessary, when I was first introduced to the notation, after having become accustomed to just using the single pair of bars.

  • @anandailyasa2530
    @anandailyasa2530 3 роки тому

    ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • @Gafa996Gaddisa
    @Gafa996Gaddisa 5 років тому

    Is Ortho Greek word which means , straight up?

    • @georgesimos4914
      @georgesimos4914 5 років тому +1

      "ορθό-ς" is used for other cases too; the one you say is one definition, but the one required for the concept of the video is "vertical"(an example is the mathematical expression "ορθή γωνία"="right angle")

    • @carultch
      @carultch Рік тому

      @@georgesimos4914 Even though I know that 3 out of 4 of the letters have completely different pronunciations, I instinctively read "ορθή" as "open". Even though I know it would sound more like "orthi".

  • @rushdisami5146
    @rushdisami5146 Рік тому

    Finally I understood Orthogonality.🤖

  • @user-iv4iy5rc1y
    @user-iv4iy5rc1y 7 місяців тому

    TE DUA

  • @marcosramirez2278
    @marcosramirez2278 2 роки тому

    I found this channel because of flat earth videos, never did I guess this man would save my math grade

  • @jaliyahkane5127
    @jaliyahkane5127 2 роки тому +1

    professor dave is an AI

  • @aniketgupta5750
    @aniketgupta5750 3 роки тому +1

    Elaborate to some extent, I mean your beginning and laying down the foundation of the topic is good but should stretch it till good level.
    Atleast that's what I feel missing in your videos, do please consider this if you see this comment.
    By the way I love your videos from quantum numbers to biomolecules all are awesome.

  • @rayandharia1718
    @rayandharia1718 10 місяців тому

    CHEMISTRY JESUS CUT HIS HAIR

  • @garyallen538
    @garyallen538 5 років тому +3

    Yeah but....what does this have to do with birds? (Sorry, couldnt resist!)