Deriving F = ma | why the value of K = 1 | Very important derivation Physics | 🔥🔥🔥

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 кві 2018
  • In this video we will learn how to derive or prove one of the most important formula of physics, "the equation F = ma", we have also discussed why the value of k (proportionality constant) is 1. We have proved it by the Newton's second law of motion. THANKS FOR WATCHING 🔥🔥🔥

КОМЕНТАРІ • 148

  • @tutstorial8474
    @tutstorial8474 4 роки тому +52

    now I need to know why change in momentum over time is equal to force

    • @urveshpatel8702
      @urveshpatel8702 3 роки тому

      Yes Absolutely Right............................

    • @vpr17
      @vpr17 3 роки тому +1

      Its a qualitatively observed phenomena. Physicists discover the relationships between mass, velocity and duration of time on net force through experiments and came to conclusion.

    • @elixar_
      @elixar_ 3 роки тому +1

      If we apply more force then there will be more change in momentum in a particular time interval.that is why F is proportional to rate of change of momentum

    • @alavialanjumsifat3682
      @alavialanjumsifat3682 3 роки тому

      This is the way force is defined.

    • @vinayakjoshi5027
      @vinayakjoshi5027 3 роки тому +1

      read the book mechanics by kleppner and kolenkow you will get to know.

  • @mohammedzaamil9791
    @mohammedzaamil9791 4 роки тому +19

    this was coming for 3 marks derivation question... thankyou so much sir

  • @verysimplephysicsinthamil1436
    @verysimplephysicsinthamil1436 6 років тому +52

    Brother You have done a very good job...continue

    • @teachingmyself96
      @teachingmyself96  6 років тому +6

      Thanks?

    • @kumarajnish1106
      @kumarajnish1106 5 років тому +1

      Osm sir👍

    • @rahulmehra7294
      @rahulmehra7294 3 роки тому +1

      Hmmm Kalu dttt ja😂😂

    • @frankdimeglio8216
      @frankdimeglio8216 3 роки тому

      @@teachingmyself96 Moscow Aviation Institute - MAI - International Student's Page has given the following the thumbs up. It's all clearly correct.
      The Institute of Physics, Patna has now given the following writing the thumbs up. Excellent.♥️
      THE MATHEMATICAL PROOF THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY IN A BALANCED FASHION IS SUCCESSFULLY DEMONSTRATED:
      "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THE SUN AND THE EARTH are F=ma AND E=mc2, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 is DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=ma. F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This explains F=ma AND E=mc2, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ACCORDINGLY, ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. INDEED, A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); as the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Great. The ability of thought to DESCRIBE OR RECONFIGURE sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience. (THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE.) Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY.
      Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is FULLY INVISIBLE AND black. The perpetual motion of WHAT IS THE EARTH is NOW explained. GREAT !!! The idea that THE PLANETS are "falling" in what is "curved space" in RELATION to what is THE SUN is PROVEN to be NONSENSE. So, the falling objects must be considered in RELATION to WHAT IS THEN THE ORBITING EARTH. GREAT !!!!!!!!!!
      By Frank DiMeglio

    • @frankdimeglio8216
      @frankdimeglio8216 2 роки тому

      @@teachingmyself96 THE MATHEMATICAL PROOF THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY (IN WHAT CONSTITUTES A BALANCED FASHION) IS SUCCESSFULLY (AND CLEARLY) DEMONSTRATED, AS E=MC2 IS F=MA:
      The Maria ("lunar seas") occupy ONE THIRD of the near side of the Moon. The land surface area of the Earth is 29 percent, AND this is EXACTLY between one quarter AND one third. The Moon is about one quarter (27 percent) the size of the Earth in what is a predictable fashion, AS it is FULLY manifest as LAND. The sky is BLUE, AND the Earth is ALSO BLUE. So, consider BALANCED BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE. LOOK at what is the orange Sun, and think LAVA. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Accordingly, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. Now, consider the fully illuminated (and setting) Moon in direct comparison with the orange Sun. They are both the size of THE EYE. Notice that the Moon is ALSO BLUE. Consider the man who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. The BULK DENSITY of the Moon is comparable to that of (volcanic) basaltic LAVAS on the Earth. The energy density of LAVA IS about three times that of water. Great. The human body is, in fact, about as dense as WATER !!! Think !!!
      "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THE SUN AND THE EARTH are F=ma AND E=MC2, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=MC2 is DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=ma. F=ma AND E=MC2 PROVE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This explains F=ma AND E=MC2, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ACCORDINGLY, ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. INDEED, A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT (c); AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. Great. The ability of thought to DESCRIBE OR RECONFIGURE sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience. (THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE.) Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY.
      Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is FULLY INVISIBLE AND black. The perpetual motion of WHAT IS THE EARTH is NOW explained. GREAT !!! The idea that THE PLANETS are "falling" in what is "curved space" in RELATION to what is THE SUN is PROVEN to be NONSENSE. So, the falling objects must be considered in RELATION to WHAT IS THEN THE ORBITING EARTH. GREAT !!! E=MC2 IS F=ma. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. I have explained why the motion of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity.
      Consider the man who is standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Accordingly, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. Great. (Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.) E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is balanced electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. So, objects AND MEN fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. A given PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out EQUAL AREAS in equal times consistent WITH/AS E=MC2, F=ma, AND what is PERPETUAL MOTION, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Excellent !!! E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE !!!
      TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense, AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE !!! Great !!!
      By Frank DiMeglio

  • @saireddy6678
    @saireddy6678 4 роки тому +1

    Nyc and easy method tq

  • @hasinapanwar6255
    @hasinapanwar6255 3 роки тому +4

    You helped me a lot bro thanks

  • @shivamhackercool4419
    @shivamhackercool4419 4 роки тому +10

    Thanks for the explanation it was so good

  • @michelleraeezboban9223
    @michelleraeezboban9223 3 роки тому +2

    Thank you sir..... It helped a lot....😊

  • @annapoorna9404
    @annapoorna9404 3 роки тому +1

    Superb explanation bro

  • @Siddharth_varma_07
    @Siddharth_varma_07 3 роки тому +2

    Sir. Plz make more and more videos related to derivations of formulas

  • @samyukthasriram5772
    @samyukthasriram5772 3 роки тому +2

    thx it was helpful

  • @shreyabhandari27
    @shreyabhandari27 4 роки тому +2

    Great job sir 👍

  • @ravinderreddy557
    @ravinderreddy557 4 роки тому +6

    It was so good I could understand easily

  • @thevisionofmysteriousworld1898
    @thevisionofmysteriousworld1898 3 роки тому +1

    Bhai full samaj ayya ur great

  • @srinivasnandanam3675
    @srinivasnandanam3675 4 роки тому +3

    Thanks for wonderful explanation it's very nice

  • @premapawar5333
    @premapawar5333 Рік тому +1

    🔥🔥 sir

  • @parasarya5359
    @parasarya5359 5 років тому +4

    It was really a great explanation .... Tq so much sir

  • @khangembamapabi9392
    @khangembamapabi9392 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you brother for your video

  • @unmoveablepenguin
    @unmoveablepenguin 5 років тому +3

    Great job, very clear

  • @kxtv4070
    @kxtv4070 5 років тому +9

    Thank you so much this helped me a lot

  • @youngsaxena2641
    @youngsaxena2641 5 років тому +9

    god bless you sir.

  • @nadine1590
    @nadine1590 3 роки тому +4

    That was so informative thanks!

  • @sakshi5b133
    @sakshi5b133 3 роки тому +3

    This derivation is coming in my long question which is of 6 marks !!!!! thanks!!

    • @total_gaming612
      @total_gaming612 3 роки тому

      Hlo sakshi can you send me your exam paper of science in my insta I'd srijal 53

  • @kashmirilalverma135
    @kashmirilalverma135 3 роки тому +1

    Good viedo

  • @loveukarina8663
    @loveukarina8663 4 роки тому +8

    You made me understand during this pandemic of covid-19 . Thank you so much ❤️

  • @anandpratapsinghsingh4622
    @anandpratapsinghsingh4622 3 роки тому +1

    Nice explanation sir 👍👌 and please make video on the Conservation of Momentum

  • @strive4joy213
    @strive4joy213 Рік тому

    Superb😁✋🏻🙏🏻

  • @why5805
    @why5805 4 роки тому +2

    thank you so muuuuuuuuuuch man i was so worried as to how k=1 you solved my problem

  • @sreejaanil7727
    @sreejaanil7727 4 роки тому +1

    super explanation sir👏👏👏👍

  • @fingo3432
    @fingo3432 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you, you are doing great job

  • @GuerrasLaws
    @GuerrasLaws 3 роки тому +4

    Physics (F=ma) test: “Without” applying the Energy from within you, choose an object of your choice, and apply only the Force or Net Force needed to push it away from you or pull it towards you. Please let me know if you’re able to. This is only a test. Thank you.

  • @madhurivlogs3043
    @madhurivlogs3043 4 роки тому +4

    Well said fellow😂😂

  • @wakilmusic1685
    @wakilmusic1685 4 роки тому +2

    Thanks brother so nicely explained.Saved me from my teacher punishment.

  • @ashujaswal1911
    @ashujaswal1911 4 роки тому +1

    Nice

  • @chandrashrestha2192
    @chandrashrestha2192 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you bro for my teach help

  • @shubhammishra4702
    @shubhammishra4702 5 років тому +3

    Awesome sir

  • @parinitakonatham
    @parinitakonatham 3 роки тому +1

    Because of u iam going to save my 3 marks on this derivation
    Thankyou sir......

  • @AmritKhatriya
    @AmritKhatriya 9 місяців тому

    Very nice sir 🙏🙏🙏🎉

  • @suman.negijskradheradhe8975
    @suman.negijskradheradhe8975 6 років тому +3

    thankyou so much sir

  • @v.nikki.r7653
    @v.nikki.r7653 3 роки тому +2

    I literally suffering to find this finally I got
    Tq sir

  • @pageflip01
    @pageflip01 4 роки тому +6

    I can see your future with 1 million subs and 4 million views.. continue but use a better mic and speak little clearly!

  • @kindlyhelpmethereach120ksu5
    @kindlyhelpmethereach120ksu5 4 роки тому

    Really helpful.Good job sir.Lots of love from West Bengal.😀😀😀😀

  • @dipanshibeniwal1842
    @dipanshibeniwal1842 5 років тому +1

    Superb

  • @bebo6077
    @bebo6077 3 роки тому +3

    Thank u so much , great work keep it up👏👏👏

  • @arun1380
    @arun1380 2 роки тому

    Thanks sir 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

  • @anjujain1361
    @anjujain1361 5 років тому +1

    Tq so much....helps alot😊😊😊😊😊😊

  • @AmanSingh-mg8fx
    @AmanSingh-mg8fx 3 роки тому

    Soon you will complete 1k

  • @Starkidsplayschool
    @Starkidsplayschool 4 роки тому

    Mast h bhai

  • @manjuth9495
    @manjuth9495 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks super video

  • @hemungkapoor2000
    @hemungkapoor2000 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much!

  • @subhradeepsahoo6841
    @subhradeepsahoo6841 4 роки тому +1

    Why we are putting the values of f,m,a as1 ?

  • @bluedevil6184
    @bluedevil6184 10 місяців тому +1

    Its actually very easy why k = 1
    F is directly proportional to ma
    Hence F = kma........ Equation 1
    So if F increases by c then ma also increases by c (bcuz F is directly proportional to ma)
    So F + c = ma + c
    F = ma + c - c
    F = ma
    So from equation 1 (F = kma)
    Since F = ma
    F = kF
    F/F = k
    1 = k

  • @pragyarai4670
    @pragyarai4670 2 роки тому

    Force is rate of change of momentum
    => F = dp/dt = d(mv)/dt = mdv/dt = ma
    Here mass is considered constant

  • @alanwayne1300
    @alanwayne1300 5 років тому +1

    Thanks bro

  • @ahmerarain5680
    @ahmerarain5680 3 роки тому +1

    Vip

  • @stevenverrall4527
    @stevenverrall4527 5 років тому +5

    Actually, net Force = ma is how we define mass. This is an unfalsifiable postulate. The action-reaction law and the conservation of momentum logically arise from net Force = ma if we consider the reference frame of two masses in contact.

    • @pageflip01
      @pageflip01 4 роки тому

      What is *unfalsifiable* .. it cannot be used in this sentence

  • @rockingadi5934
    @rockingadi5934 3 роки тому

    Thank you😊🙏sir

  • @jeetanand8407
    @jeetanand8407 3 роки тому +1

    Equations of motion is completely independent of mass. The question is how come the idea of force and mass arrived? Hope you find out ? We dont need mass or concept of force to know about acceleration.

  • @thequestions7013
    @thequestions7013 4 роки тому +3

    Now I Understood why K is Considered as 1.. Thank You Sir😊😊

  • @diyakithani9483
    @diyakithani9483 4 роки тому

    Thankyou😃

  • @ayushmaurya7940
    @ayushmaurya7940 5 років тому

    Good work

  • @sadanandyadav7100
    @sadanandyadav7100 3 роки тому

    Good

  • @pragyadahal7039
    @pragyadahal7039 2 роки тому

    Thanks for you tommorow is my exam

  • @sunitakandher844
    @sunitakandher844 4 роки тому

    Thanks sir

  • @nischit727
    @nischit727 4 роки тому +30

    3:06 this is what you came for

  • @kabilkarrs1108
    @kabilkarrs1108 4 роки тому +1

    can u xplain the last step clearly bro

  • @masummehtab22
    @masummehtab22 3 місяці тому +1

    If we
    Let k is not constant

  • @dr.rahulgupta7573
    @dr.rahulgupta7573 2 роки тому +1

    Sir F= m.a is not Newton's law. Actually F = dp/ dt = d( m.v ) / dt = m.dv/ dt + v .dm / dt = m.a + v.dm / dt . OR IN MATRIX FORM if we write F = m.a then F is a 3×1 matrix , a is also 3×1 matrix but m is not a scalar it is a matrix of order 3×3 hence a dydic ( a tensor of rank 2 ) .

  • @crispygaming5217
    @crispygaming5217 3 роки тому +1

    Bro what is that triangle sign in first step

  • @lakhi22794
    @lakhi22794 11 місяців тому

    Agar k equal zero then what we do

  • @siddk8260
    @siddk8260 5 років тому

    👍👌👌

  • @dipakmukunda1040
    @dipakmukunda1040 5 років тому +3

    Sir F=ma Newton ka real second law nahi hai kya. dp/dt proportional F real hai. Or F=ma second law ka ek result hai.

  • @narendrasinghkushwah3909
    @narendrasinghkushwah3909 5 років тому +1

    Sir too good....i am dying to do this....now i got that....because of u...thanx sir...

  • @achyutlina5561
    @achyutlina5561 5 років тому +1

    Tqq

  • @herolol4134
    @herolol4134 5 років тому

    Thanks

  • @meowmemes6307
    @meowmemes6307 3 роки тому

    Sir If we take F ,m,a as 2,3 ,4 etc. Then k value will not be one!! Explain11

  • @hassanmaalik8789
    @hassanmaalik8789 5 років тому +1

    Thanks for explaining in a very good way😇😇👌👌

  • @mrperegrine1041
    @mrperegrine1041 3 роки тому

    🙋‍♂️

  • @sotrechoronghang1967
    @sotrechoronghang1967 4 роки тому +1

    Hi I'm karbi from Assam
    I think we can write f=mak

  • @sanskarmalviya7086
    @sanskarmalviya7086 4 роки тому +1

    Sir kuch samajh nhi aa rha

  • @achanda8206
    @achanda8206 4 роки тому

    Thnx sir

  • @bilaldesai1573
    @bilaldesai1573 4 роки тому +1

    Superb sir. Nice explanation and graphics.I understood it well. Thanks.

  • @masummehtab22
    @masummehtab22 3 місяці тому

    But my doubt is not complete, why k is 1 ???

  • @prakashgajbar5100
    @prakashgajbar5100 2 роки тому

    why k=1 is considered???

  • @klynparker2913
    @klynparker2913 5 років тому

    Sir loved it ... Please bring more kind of these videoa

  • @vishalkrishnaa9953
    @vishalkrishnaa9953 3 роки тому +1

    Reply me do you this is correct

  • @jayashreekhandekar3687
    @jayashreekhandekar3687 3 роки тому +1

    Teachers: can't explain this simple equation in 40 minutes and says the students are dumb
    Indian guy on UA-cam: explains this equation within 4:20 seconds with extra query left and in a simple accent

  • @dhanyapc4394
    @dhanyapc4394 4 роки тому

    💚❤️🤞👍👍💪

  • @black_jack_meghav
    @black_jack_meghav 5 років тому +2

    Thanks bro ! ( But i knew why k=1)

  • @amogusus7695
    @amogusus7695 2 роки тому

    Strong accent

  • @sangamsharms2402
    @sangamsharms2402 5 років тому +3

    But in laws of gravitation the value is not 1 why ...plz tell me

    • @teachingmyself96
      @teachingmyself96  4 роки тому +3

      Because at that time value of small g was already defined

  • @colourbrushes5138
    @colourbrushes5138 3 роки тому

    Are u a bengali ? Because of ur accent

  • @_Devansh_1M_
    @_Devansh_1M_ 2 роки тому +1

    ꪻꫝꪖꪀᛕ ꪗꪮꪊ ᦓ꠸᥅ ꠹꠸

  • @anujsinghak5386
    @anujsinghak5386 2 роки тому

    Sab tt thik ba guru ji lekin hindi me samjhai na

  • @lakhi22794
    @lakhi22794 11 місяців тому

    Khari cheez PE yar koi force kaise ho skti hai gar stone apne app move kre to keh skte hai k is one otherwise it's zero

  • @karunadhungana2885
    @karunadhungana2885 4 роки тому

    Plz prove f=ma

  • @bhavyabharatchandra599
    @bhavyabharatchandra599 4 роки тому

    it's ok for 9th graders

  • @rishabhnegi2762
    @rishabhnegi2762 5 років тому

    Sir please hindi ues please sir

  • @itsmine9423
    @itsmine9423 2 роки тому

    Ap ya English ma kun bol rhay han American logo na to ni dakhna hum hi han vo jin ka school ma sab samjiya ni jata .......

  • @rishikashyap2834
    @rishikashyap2834 5 років тому

    Mat tu baje bhai baha'i. Hi Ian from asm

  • @sivnandankeshri1990
    @sivnandankeshri1990 5 років тому +1

    Indeed awesome