Waldorf Quantum - DEMO - Analog Filter VS Digital & SYNTH Engine Capabilities
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 лип 2024
- 1 & 2 Layers patches - On board FX only -Waveform - Wave tables - Fm - Resonator - Particle
see comment for full list
0:00 - Digital NAVE 12 db - FILTER SWEEP (saw waveforme)
1:08 - Digital PPG 12 db - FILTER SWEEP (saw waveforme)
4:07 - Analog 12 db saturated - FILTER SWEEP (saw waveforme)
5:53 - Analog 24 db - FILTER SWEEP (saw waveforme)
7:05 - Analog 24 db Two filters linked - STABE (saw waveforme)
8:26 - Analog 24 db Two filters linked Stabe PAD (saw waveforme)
9:00 - Analog 12 db - SOFT PAD (saw waveforme)
10:24 - Analog 12 db - 2 Layers: STRINGS & ARP (saw waveforme)
13:22 - Analog 24 db dual filter - 2 Layers: STRINGS PAD & ARP (saw waveforme)
14:34 - Analog 24 db dirty filter - 2 Layers: STRINGS & ARP (saw waveforme)
15:32 - Analog 12 db - 2 Layers: LEAD & STRINGS (saw waveforme)
17:51 - Analog 12 db - ARP (saw waveforme)
18:57 - Analog 24 db -ARP (saw waveforme)
20:30 - Analog 24 db dirty gain - ARP (saw waveforme)
22:24 - Digital NAVE Band pass PARALELLE Analog 24db (3 wavetables)
23:01 - Digital comb filter & Analog 24 db - Distant Galaxies (on board patch)
24:10 - Digital comb filter & Analog 24 db - Edited Distant Galaxies
25:28 - Digital NAVE Band pass & Analog 24 db PARALELLE FILTER SWEEP (2wavetables)
25:44 - Digital NAVE Band pass & Analog 24 db PARALELLE FILTER SWEEP (1wavetable)
26:21 - Digital & Analog Filter SWEEP - Split Wavetables & Saw waveform
27:09 - Digital & Analog Filter SWEEP - Split Wavetables & Saw waveform
27:40 - Digital PPG PARALELLE (2 wavetables )
28:01 - Analog 24db saturated - 2 Layers (wavetables)
28:22 - Analog 24db - 2 Layers (wavetalbes) Bell & Noise
28:56 - Analog 24db - 2 Layers (wavetalbes) Big Bell & Noise
30:25 - Analog 24db - 2 Layers (wavetalbes) Big Bell & Noise
31:04 - Edited on board patch
31:17 - Digital NAVE 12db - FM & RESONATOR
32:10 - Digital NAVE 12db - FM & RESONATOR
32:53 - Digital PPG 24db - 2 Layers: 2wavetables & 1waveform PLUCK
33:57 - Analog 12db saturated - 1particle & 1wavetable (edited patch - neuron sample IMAO)
34:43 - Digital PPG 24db & Analog 12db PARALELLE (neuron samle)
35:01 - Digital PPG 24db & Analog 12db PARALELLE - 2 Layers: 1particle - 2particle 1waveform
36:19 - Digital PPG 24db - 1 Particle Bell
36:53 - Digital PPG 24db - 2layers: 1particle Bell - 1particle neuron37:50 - Analog 12db saturated -
2wave form (edited patch) Noise Rythm
38:40 - Analog 12db saturated gain - 2waveforms (edited patch) Noise Rythm
39:29 - Digital NAVE BP12db & Analog 24db PARALELLE - sample&hold (3wave forms)
41:36 - Digital NAVE BP12db & Analog 24db PARALELLE - 2Layers split: waveform & resonator
44:32 - Analog 12db - STRINGS - 2wave forms
46:26 - Digital NAVE 12db & Analog 12db dirty - 2Layers: 2wavetables & 1wavetable
47:39 - Analog 12db saturated & Analog 12db dirty - 2Layers: 2wavetables & 1wavetable
48:25 - Analog 12db dirty - 2 wavetables
48:36 - Analog 12db dirty - 1 wavetable - Steping wave table
49:34 - Analog 12db dirty - 1 wavetable - Sweeping wave table
50:17 - Analog 12db saturated - 1 wavetable - sweeping wave table
50:37 - Analog 12db saturated - 1 wavetable - steping wave table
51:06 - Analog 12db sat - 2Layers: 1 wavetable & 1waveform - Fm & wavetable
51:35 - Analog 12db sat - 2Layers: 1 wavetable - steping wavetable
52:28 - Analog 12db sat - 2Layers: 1wavetable 1waveform - 1 Fm Kernel 1wavetable
54:13 - Analog 12db - 2Layers: 1wavetable 1waveform - 1 Fm Kernel 1wavetable PLUK
56:11 - Analog 12db - 2Layers: 1wavetable 1waveform - 1 Fm Kernel 1wavetable COSMIC
58:39 - Analog 12db -12db sat - 2Layers: 1wavetable 1waveform - 1wavetable 1fm - PAD
1:01:17 - Analog 12db -12db sat - 2Layers: 1wavetable 1waveform - 1wavetable 1fm - PAD flanger
1:02:00 - Digital & Analog 12db - 2layers: 1wavetable 1waveform - 1wavetable 1fm - PAD flanger
1:03:25 - Digital SVP 12db-Analog 12db sat 40/50%mix - 1waveform 1wavetable - PAD flanger
1:04:04 - Digital NAVE12db-Analog 12db sat -2Layers: wavetable Fm waveform & wavetable FM PAD
1:05:21 - Digital NAVE-Analog 12db sat -2Layers: 1Resonator 1Fm & 1wavetable 1Fm PAD cosmic
1:07:24 - Digital NAVE-Analog 12db sat -2Layers: 1Resonator 1Fm & 1wavetable 1Fm Bell Sweep
1:08:32 - Digital NAVE-Analog 12db sat -2Layers: 1Resonator 1Fm & 1wavetable 1Fm Bell ATONAL
1:09:00 - Analog 24db - 1 wavetable 1 Fm - PAD BELL atonal
1:10:00 - Analog 24db - 2 wavetables PAD sweeping wavetalbe & filter
1:10:42 - Analog 24db - 1wavetable 1waveform ARP
1:11:07 - Analog 24db - 2 wavetables WHITE NOISE
1:11:42 - Analog 24db -
1:12:20 - Analog 24db -
1:13:07 - Analog 24db -
1:15:29 - Analog 24db
1:16:17 - Analog 24db
1:19:13 - Digital NAVE Band pass - Analog 24db
1:21:02 - Analog 12db 1
1:21:29 - Dark Passage
1:22:01 - Analog 12db -
1:22:34 - Analog 12db -
1:22:50 - Digital NAVE 12db
1:23:36 - Digital NAVE 12db
1:23:52 - Digital comb filter & Analog 12db sat
This Demo shows the capabilities of the synthesizer engine instead of just the onboard samples that are done with other synths
Wow, you have put an effort here. Shows the versatality of Quantum indeed
thanks
Forgot to say... it sounds as if it was everything I'd ever need from a synth. Sweet and crisp, or whatever in between 🤘🤘
@@seppoinnanen5577 yes maybe, but i have never been able to have only one synth... Except once i had to choose between my Moog Voyager, the Tom Oberheim OB6 and the Deepmind12 and i chose the Deepmin12 for its versatility of sounds and my love of the roland style filter... I think if you are picky about the 100% analog sounds then it can't replace an analog synth despite it's anlaog sound being very nice. But if you can't live with only the analog sound and need other sources of sound then this is a great alternative. And yes todays plugins are amazing... sometihing like Omnisphere is astounding, the only downsize is having to choose in a limitless source of sounds and not spend days listening to presets with automations and the fact that they never did a hardware to controle it. I now see second hand Quantums mk1 down to 2500 euros and that's probably worth it.
0:00 - Digital NAVE 12 db - FILTER SWEEP (saw waveforme)
1:08 - Digital PPG 12 db - FILTER SWEEP (saw waveforme)
4:07 - Analog 12 db saturated - FILTER SWEEP (saw waveforme)
5:53 - Analog 24 db - FILTER SWEEP (saw waveforme)
7:05 - Analog 24 db Two filters linked - STABE (saw waveforme)
8:26 - Analog 24 db Two filters linked Stabe PAD (saw waveforme)
9:00 - Analog 12 db - SOFT PAD (saw waveforme)
10:24 - Analog 12 db - 2 Layers: STRINGS & ARP (saw waveforme)
13:22 - Analog 24 db dual filter - 2 Layers: STRINGS PAD & ARP (saw waveforme)
14:34 - Analog 24 db dirty filter - 2 Layers: STRINGS & ARP (saw waveforme)
15:32 - Analog 12 db - 2 Layers: LEAD & STRINGS (saw waveforme)
17:51 - Analog 12 db - ARP (saw waveforme)
18:57 - Analog 24 db -ARP (saw waveforme)
20:30 - Analog 24 db dirty gain - ARP (saw waveforme)
22:24 - Digital NAVE Band pass PARALELLE Analog 24db (3 wavetables)
23:01 - Digital comb filter & Analog 24 db - Distant Galaxies (on board patch)
24:10 - Digital comb filter & Analog 24 db - Edited Distant Galaxies
25:28 - Digital NAVE Band pass & Analog 24 db PARALELLE FILTER SWEEP (2wavetables)
25:44 - Digital NAVE Band pass & Analog 24 db PARALELLE FILTER SWEEP (1wavetable)
26:21 - Digital & Analog Filter SWEEP - Split Wavetables & Saw waveform
27:09 - Digital & Analog Filter SWEEP - Split Wavetables & Saw waveform
27:40 - Digital PPG PARALELLE (2 wavetables )
28:01 - Analog 24db saturated - 2 Layers (wavetables)
28:22 - Analog 24db - 2 Layers (wavetalbes) Bell & Noise
28:56 - Analog 24db - 2 Layers (wavetalbes) Big Bell & Noise
30:25 - Analog 24db - 2 Layers (wavetalbes) Big Bell & Noise
31:04 - Edited on board patch
31:17 - Digital NAVE 12db - FM & RESONATOR
32:10 - Digital NAVE 12db - FM & RESONATOR
32:53 - Digital PPG 24db - 2 Layers: 2wavetables & 1waveform PLUCK
33:57 - Analog 12db saturated - 1particle & 1wavetable (edited patch - neuron sample IMAO)
34:43 - Digital PPG 24db & Analog 12db PARALELLE (neuron samle)
35:01 - Digital PPG 24db & Analog 12db PARALELLE - 2 Layers: 1particle - 2particle 1waveform
36:19 - Digital PPG 24db - 1 Particle Bell
36:53 - Digital PPG 24db - 2layers: 1particle Bell - 1particle neuron37:50 - Analog 12db saturated -
2wave form (edited patch) Noise Rythm
38:40 - Analog 12db saturated gain - 2waveforms (edited patch) Noise Rythm
39:29 - Digital NAVE BP12db & Analog 24db PARALELLE - sample&hold (3wave forms)
41:36 - Digital NAVE BP12db & Analog 24db PARALELLE - 2Layers split: waveform & resonator
44:32 - Analog 12db - STRINGS - 2wave forms
46:26 - Digital NAVE 12db & Analog 12db dirty - 2Layers: 2wavetables & 1wavetable
47:39 - Analog 12db saturated & Analog 12db dirty - 2Layers: 2wavetables & 1wavetable
48:25 - Analog 12db dirty - 2 wavetables
48:36 - Analog 12db dirty - 1 wavetable - Steping wave table
49:34 - Analog 12db dirty - 1 wavetable - Sweeping wave table
50:17 - Analog 12db saturated - 1 wavetable - sweeping wave table
50:37 - Analog 12db saturated - 1 wavetable - steping wave table
51:06 - Analog 12db sat - 2Layers: 1 wavetable & 1waveform - Fm & wavetable
51:35 - Analog 12db sat - 2Layers: 1 wavetable - steping wavetable
52:28 - Analog 12db sat - 2Layers: 1wavetable 1waveform - 1 Fm Kernel 1wavetable
54:13 - Analog 12db - 2Layers: 1wavetable 1waveform - 1 Fm Kernel 1wavetable PLUK
56:11 - Analog 12db - 2Layers: 1wavetable 1waveform - 1 Fm Kernel 1wavetable COSMIC
58:39 - Analog 12db -12db sat - 2Layers: 1wavetable 1waveform - 1wavetable 1fm - PAD
1:01:17 - Analog 12db -12db sat - 2Layers: 1wavetable 1waveform - 1wavetable 1fm - PAD flanger
1:02:00 - Digital & Analog 12db - 2layers: 1wavetable 1waveform - 1wavetable 1fm - PAD flanger
1:03:25 - Digital SVP 12db-Analog 12db sat 40/50%mix - 1waveform 1wavetable - PAD flanger
1:04:04 - Digital NAVE12db-Analog 12db sat -2Layers: wavetable Fm waveform & wavetable FM PAD
1:05:21 - Digital NAVE-Analog 12db sat -2Layers: 1Resonator 1Fm & 1wavetable 1Fm PAD cosmic
1:07:24 - Digital NAVE-Analog 12db sat -2Layers: 1Resonator 1Fm & 1wavetable 1Fm Bell Sweep
1:08:32 - Digital NAVE-Analog 12db sat -2Layers: 1Resonator 1Fm & 1wavetable 1Fm Bell ATONAL
1:09:00 - Analog 24db - 1 wavetable 1 Fm - PAD BELL atonal
1:10:00 - Analog 24db - 2 wavetables PAD sweeping wavetalbe & filter
1:10:42 - Analog 24db - 1wavetable 1waveform ARP
1:11:07 - Analog 24db - 2 wavetables WHITE NOISE
1:11:42 - Analog 24db - 2 wavetables - Filter sweep & White Noise
1:12:20 - Analog 24db - 1 particle 1 waveform - PAD white noise & glitchy
1:13:07 - Analog 24db - 1 particle 1 waveform 1 wavetable (slight edited patch) Belly ARP
1:15:29 - Analog 24db - 1 Resonator 1 waveform 1 wavetable PAD
1:16:17 - Analog 24db - 2 wavetables - Bell sustained reverb - wheel travel position
1:19:13 - Digital NAVE Band pass - Analog 24db PARALELLE - 3wavetables - PAD cosmic
1:21:02 - Analog 12db 1particle 1waveform 1wavetable (on board patch) Bell Drops
1:21:29 - Dark Passage - 1 wavetable 2particles (slight edited on board patch) Space weird
1:22:01 - Analog 12db - 1particle 1waveform 1wavetable (on board patch) Bell Drops
1:22:34 - Analog 12db - 1wavetable 2waveforms PAD Sweep
1:22:50 - Digital NAVE 12db - 1resonator ( slight edit ) airy resonator then ARP
1:23:36 - Digital NAVE 12db - 2resonators (on board patch (slight edit)
1:23:52 - Digital comb filter & Analog 12db sat - 1resonator 1waveform 1wavetable - Flanged Chorus
pretty amazing for a digital synth ! It won't replace a pure analog synth but the analog type sounds are very nice and the filters too ! Thanks for posting this work !
yes i agree...
The analog filters make a big difference in the sound from what I can hear…Really good patches!
Thank you very much , appreciated ... the digital ones are very nice too don't you find ?
@@smartti1970 mmm Yes but I like the analog better….what do you think?
@@zivdayan8919 i was suprised how good the digital filters are . those who have iridium can be very happy without the analog i think. The analog although very respectfull of the signal without huge coloration, do have that livelyness of analog, and the subtle saturation you can add is nice, the 24db does make tings fatter and the 12 airy lovely. i didn't show all the different cool modes like dual peak , opposite etc . I really like the filters on this synth , they are cosmic, smooth singing harmonics, no filter stepping ...
Wow what an incredible video on the Quantum this was exactly what I was looking for.. Don't know how I missed it😂
I know you have some amazing synths so wondering if you have or have tried the 3rd Wave? And any opinions you have on it?
Cheers!😃
Thanks very much , appreciat your comment.
I have heard all the demos out there of the 3rd Wave. Sure I haven't tried it, but from what i heard and read confirms my impressions. The overall sound caracter is imho rawer more in your face, the analog filters have more caracter compared to the more high-fi sounding of the Quantum. The Va is very good, the 4 part multi-timbrality makes for sofisticated layering plus it's 24 voice polyphony, and good quality Fx and now it has new sampling capabilities. My opinion is that it's fantastic but like Quantum so expensive. When they launched the unofficial first batch i was offered 3500.- by 3rd Wave so when it when up to 5k i was disapointed.................. For an analog nerds like me the hybrids won't replace an fully analog synth (if i should have only 1) There is still for my ears , some sort of "clean" high-fi overall sound caracter like Quantum.... . The VA and Wavetables made it more limitedd tone wise in the begining, (though now it adds sample) compared to the the Quantum's various synthesizer engines.... but all these synth engins are done in such high quality now in Vst's !!!! and even entry level synths are so high quality like korg wavestate etc) that's it's hard to justify these high end synths. The pros being you have the analog filters (but the digital ones are so good !) and of course having the interface with the knobs for quick intuitive editing and a nice instrument.... But Digital synths loose there value , particularly when Mk2 comes out, ( i was so anoyed when Quantum did an Mk2 because it's value droped 1k on the used market, i brought mine 3k used and now they go for 2000-2200.- in europe) But the 3rd Wave will keep better it's value i think if they don't do a Mk2 which they said they are not doing because it would be unfaire to the customers.... So what to do ? be patient and wait for a used one maybe? Ps: The Quantum is bi-timbral only but each of the 3 oscillator can be a totaly different synth engin, it's like having 6 different sounds (but only two sets of envelopes and filters) also has a very prestine reverb and fx...
@@smartti1970 Great detailed reply thanks.. Yes its the 24 voices and Multitimbrality that most interest me about the 3rd Wave funny.. I was actually at Superbooth and looked at the 3rd Wave and chatted a little to the guy that wrote the Software code but I really didn't try it out properly as there was so much more I was interested to see..
But now I wish I had put on some headphones and had a play.
Anyway I don't have to much GAS now but if I see a good price on a second hand one I may pick it up.. Its a nice Synth to team up with my others and fills the Gaps that my other synth don't quite provide.
@@nagchumpalot Ps: the filters have more caracter on the 3rd wave (i think they are p5's ? , but i love the waldorfs including the digital ones because they have that sort of roland style of voyelle expressivité , for pads they are lovely , i going to post another waldorf track with it.
@@smartti1970 Yes I have no problem with some digital filters I loved them on the Virus and I think Those engineers were Waldorf previously if I´m not mistaken.. Great look forward to hearing that track.
The question Im facing, is - is it worth laying out a net spend of around £2500 to change from an iridium to a Quantum Mk2. the only difference being an extra octave of Poly AT keys and the analogue filters.....
Hi, just sharing my thoughts on this, I would love to have the poly after touch but having brought this synth used, i wouldn't want to buy it new with that huge price tag knowing they will be futur devaluation on it and it's the same synth sounds. The Mk2 was harmfull to the Mk1 value so Mk2 will devalue a bit soon and could be brought used. But there is already so much to do on this synthesizer without poly after touch ! You can set many parameters to after touch, mod wheel, touch screen pad etc ..... ..............................................................................................................................................................................................Have you heard the differences between the Quantum's analog and digital filter ? It exists but those digital filters have for me such a high end quality i'm amazed ! . Now i'm happy the analogs are there but they are subtle, they don't have so much character on the sound like the filters of the PPG, Modal Electronics 002, Sequential Circuits Prophet VS. . . i was really disappointed with Waldorf's marketing tactits ! Do we have a Jupiter 8 mk2 , Cs80 mk2 ? That was their flag ship Synthesizer and now the Quantum has lost almost half it's value on the used market. Minimoog's Jupiter 8's Voyagers's are keeping there value... Ps: (The Mk1 has an upgrade that brings same polyphonie as Mk2 and Iridium) ......................................................................................................................................................................................so is it worth it ? that's up to you to decide. Do you want to spend so much money on a big heavy 61 polyphonic keyboard (attached to your Iridium) that will take up space in your setup ? (Basicaly the same sound as Iridium) Is this synthesizer so central in your setup that it deserves to take up so much space (and money) The Quantum's hardware is a nice object with all the leds and screen and knobs but so is the Iridium. I must admit i did hesitate to sell it at one point, (being an analog fan) but for now the sounds i hear in this video makes me want to keep it. Cheers
Quantums will get more expensive as time goes.. I'm sure of that
Im confused. Is this the MK2?
Sounds very good i like it.
The Mk2 is blue and is exactly the same synthesizer , same patches and sounds, except the keyboard is polyphonic aftertouch . The Mk1 now has an upgrade that gives it 16 voice polyphony like the Mk2
@@smartti1970 Thank you sir! Very helpful video. :)
@@phanuel_1986 you're welcome
@@smartti1970 do you have any songs you've made with this synth? I'm interested how one might sound. Or just combinations of different sounds from the synth.
@@phanuel_1986 i have this one with on board FX and the old but very good Lexicon Pcm80 ua-cam.com/video/VzI4o-9B1Y0/v-deo.html
Great video, BUT more adverts than any YT video I've ever listened to. Such a shame - I still listened all the way to the end.
how anoying, can I do anything to prevent this ? I'v noticed youtube has started to interupt long videos with adverts ! On my 2015 computer I have adblock that still works...
@@smartti1970 I'm not a YT content creator, however did hear another content creator mention there were Settings for amount of advertising. AFAIK, videos with small number of views make nothing or hardly anything for their creators. If true, it's probably best to not get paid by YT and hope to get more views and grow your channel. Although the Quantum seems great, personally I'd want a chance to play one, for that kind of money, especially how good the analogue filters and aftertouch are, compared to say Iridium Core. Great video, anyway, with or without commercials!
@@bilonggrisimmeri thanks i'll check if i can do something in the settings... the only thing that interests me in doing videos is for myself and sharing with others, certainly not being paid. The Quantum's digital filters are in my opinion really good, the analog ones bring something subtil. In this video if you listen with headphones, that's realy how it sounds... One person commented that the difference was evident to him. I don't know if my ears are getting "old" but i find it subtil. I'm glad i have them but they are not fat like the Modal 002 or a little rough and squelchy like the Groove Synthesis 3rd wave.... This synth is now found second hand in my region down to 2000.- .
@@smartti1970 I know what you mean about digital filters, as I have a Super 6. The bass from those SSM analogue filters is earth-shaking. I imagine the majority of music gear UA-camrs do it for the love of making music. Hope my feedback helps your channel grow. I was listenng on headphones, but will re-listen to your video on my amazing transmission line speaker/digital power amp setup.
@@bilonggrisimmeri Thanks very much... I think that the SSM analog filters on the Super6 have more analog caracter ... I see Waldorf as having a more german sound, precise , transparent. I love the Super6 but they do both have the same kind of sound in the sens of a mix of virtuel analog and digital waves , the only thing more to the waldorf would be the granular engin but it is very basic.... so many tempting synths !