Sony's Newest Macro Lens! Sony 70-200mm F4 G OSS ii Macro Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 чер 2024
  • Reviewing Sony's Newest Macro Lens! Sony 70-200mm F4 G OSS ii Macro Review
    Buy it here - amzn.to/3SVj0l2 (Amazon) bhpho.to/43oCqk3 (B&H)
    Timestamps
    0:00 Intro & Specs
    1:05 Build & Features
    2:54 Performance
    5:21 Sharpness
    8:08 Distortion & Vignetting
    9:05 Image Stabilization
    9:56 Value
    10:57 Conclusion
    Become a Member to get access to exclusive perks:
    / @stefanmalloch
    See all links for my gear below.
    Social Media
    / hypnotikphotography
    / hypnotikcamera
    Business Contact
    www.hypnotikphotography.com
    info@hypnotikphotography.com
    Below are affiliate links. If you want to buy these items or services through the following links, I will get a small kick back and it doesn't cost you anything. Thanks!
    My Gear & Tools:
    Amazon.com /.ca /.eu / B&H
    Camera & Lenses:
    Sony A7iii - amzn.to/2VZqO5M (Amazon) bhpho.to/3GWC1Ot (B&H)
    Sony A7iv - amzn.to/3Tm2NU1 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3VJ2svg (B&H)
    Sony A6600 - amzn.to/2T02P76 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3B2WRI3 (B&H)
    Sony 1.4X Teleconverter - amzn.to/303UMcL (Amazon) bhpho.to/3XMXE9N (B&H)
    Sony 14mm F1.8 GM - amzn.to/3njm11s (Amazon) bhpho.to/3NtK3S0 (B&H)
    Sony 50mm F1.8 - amzn.to/2K0kkzb (Amazon) bhpho.to/3VE4a0L (B&H)
    Samyang 85mm F1.4 - amzn.to/36J8wLf (Amazon) bhpho.to/3Vil4Ci (B&H)
    Samyang 135mm F1.8 - amzn.to/3gJ4eNX (Amazon) bhpho.to/3uccV6w (B&H)
    Sony 90mm F2.8 Macro - amzn.to/2oWUYe8 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3OPiEsi (B&H)
    Laowa 25mm Ultra Macro - amzn.to/3fCflb4 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3AYGEDG (B&H)
    Sony FE 16-35 F4 - amzn.to/2VU2Ybs (Amazon) bhpho.to/3gNvavV (B&H)
    Tamron 20-40mm F2.8 - amzn.to/3WvygF3 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3iqJZFc (B&H)
    Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 - amzn.to/31WswJm (Amazon) bhpho.to/3UnFsRl (B&H)
    Tamron 35-150mm F2-2.8 - amzn.to/3CgsGee (Amazon) bhpho.to/3AYaKaq (B&H)
    Tamron 50-400mm - amzn.to/3GUUf2O (Amazon) bhpho.to/3uc6QXR (B&H)
    Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 ART - amzn.to/2ZTyOrj (Amazon) bhpho.to/3VEinLg (B&H)
    Sony 100-400mm GM - amzn.to/2Gufk3O (Amazon) bhpho.to/3UhdGpn (B&H)
    Spare 3rd Party Batteries for A7iii/A7IV - amzn.to/2RLytWH
    Godox Flash - amzn.to/2WeDOo7 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3H3RUCD (B&H)
    Flash Reciever - amzn.to/2Tah7Q1 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3Vimn4a (B&H)
    Insta360 One X2 - amzn.to/3rRnwRa (Amazon) bhpho.to/3iw8OQk (B&H)
    DJI Pocket 2 -amzn.to/3lcjgIQ (Amazon) bhpho.to/3H1LgwK (B&H)
    Drones
    Mini 3 Pro here - amzn.to/3QbPKCX (Amazon) bhpho.to/3VryrQH (B&H)
    The ONLY Camera Straps I use:
    Peak Design Slide - amzn.to/2NZrCWd (Amazon) bhpho.to/3OPkOrU (B&H)
    Peak Design Slide Light - amzn.to/2r9GVCE (Amazon) bhpho.to/3XQg1dV (B&H)
    Tripods & Monopods
    Peak Design Tripod - amzn.to/399Hj8d (Amazon) bhpho.to/3OY4vJx (B&H)
    Vanguard Alta 263AT - amzn.to/2O0oLwc (Amazon) bhpho.to/3OSymTD (B&H)
    JOBY GorillaPod 3K - amzn.to/2CZHSjO (Amazon) bhpho.to/3Fj9bql (B&H)
    Slypod Pro - amzn.to/3g0iVfh (Amazon) bhpho.to/3GUWl2G (B&H)
    Slypod E - amzn.to/3Eu2fWL (Amazon)
    ND Filters
    Freewell ALL IN 1 - amzn.to/3E6R4TN (Amazon) bhpho.to/3gQ3BSS (B&H)
    Freewell VND Mist - amzn.to/3qmfm28 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3Uoxl6Z (B&H)
    B&W 10 Stop - amzn.to/2XuaOd3 (Amazon)
    Camera Bag
    Tenba Solstice 10L Bag - amzn.to/3pSUosy (Amazon) bhpho.to/3ipvy4f (B&H)
    Case Logic SLRC-206 - amzn.to/2CUNX0O (Amazon) bhpho.to/3gJrz2d (B&H)
    UA-cam Gear & Essentials
    Voice Over Mic - amzn.to/3ilje4Y (Amazon)
    Rode Wireless Go 2 - amzn.to/3XXMwHo (Amazon) bhpho.to/3OS9xXP (B&H)
    Shotgun Mic - amzn.to/37wADx0 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3gQdgsG (B&H)
    Godox SL60W - amzn.to/2tFGrp8 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3VLCSWo (B&H)
    RGB LED Lights - amzn.to/3ljSxu8
    Wireless Video Kit - amzn.to/3VkxZ6F (Amazon) bhpho.to/3OVTubJ (B&H)
    Elgato Stream Deck - amzn.to/2WoFFZD (Amazon) bhpho.to/3ujwvxO (B&H)
    Software
    Adobe Cloud (Photoshop, Lightroom..) - bit.ly/2UO17a3
    Luminar AI - skylum.evyy.net/c/1987721/880...
    Tube Buddy - (Free!) - www.tubebuddy.com/SMBUDDY
    Music: www.bensound.com
  • Навчання та стиль

КОМЕНТАРІ • 87

  • @StefanMalloch
    @StefanMalloch  11 місяців тому +9

    I don't usually too excited about a new F4 lens, but this thing is incredible! What do you think?

    • @architecture_logs
      @architecture_logs 11 місяців тому +3

      I think it's stupid af. in that price get the 100-400gm and have a good day :D

    • @rumattso
      @rumattso 11 місяців тому +7

      @@architecture_logs What is stupid is to buy a 100-400 when you need a light 70-200!

    • @vincep2485
      @vincep2485 10 місяців тому

      Is the Sony FE 90 mm F 2.8 Macro G OSS Full Frame better than this lens? I’m trying to decide because I’m ready to buy 90 mm but I’m not sure

    • @markhoon7931
      @markhoon7931 9 місяців тому

      @@vincep2485 i have both lenses both lenses have different characters but for macro i think the 90mm is better but the 70-200mm is great as well.

    • @Chris-ey7zy
      @Chris-ey7zy 3 місяці тому

      @@vincep24851:1 90 but you are limited to 90

  • @swanstudios2018
    @swanstudios2018 11 місяців тому +3

    Wow I'm super excited about this lens definitely shaking up my Sony camera wish list. Thanks for the heads up you were on this quick. ^^

  • @strippedlist
    @strippedlist 11 місяців тому +2

    Best review till now for this lens

  • @RickMentore
    @RickMentore 11 місяців тому +2

    The child @3:18 is most adorable! Fantastic job Stef. I am considering selling my Sony FE 90mm f/2.8 Macro and Sigma 100-400mm f/5-6.3 DG DN OS to get this new beauty!

  • @rumattso
    @rumattso 11 місяців тому +2

    Great video. A superb lens!

  • @richardpcrowe
    @richardpcrowe 11 місяців тому +2

    Seems like a great lens with wonderful features. I wish Sony had spent an extra dollar or so and machined Arca Compatible grooves onto the tripod foot - like Tamron and Sigma.

  • @g_lantos
    @g_lantos 2 місяці тому

    Would you recommend this 70-200 F4 macro and the Tamron 28-75 g2 combo for events and sport videography over the Tamron 35-150? I know the Tamron 35-150 doesn't have stabilization but it's heavier and my FX3/A7IV both have IBIS... but I am not sure how's the 35-150's autofocus speed for fast moving subjects. especially when people run towards the camera... I know the Macro lens would probably handle it.

  • @panyawatmuangtham6968
    @panyawatmuangtham6968 11 місяців тому +1

    Great review as usual! What do you think comparing this lens to Tamron 70-180? Is it worth extra money for its macro capability and built quality?

    • @StefanMalloch
      @StefanMalloch  11 місяців тому +1

      Might try and do a video on all the 70-200 options. Lots of work so bear with me.

  • @backyardjunkie
    @backyardjunkie 8 місяців тому +1

    Dude, really nice review.Just one question, this lens or the Tamron 35-150. Cheers buddy.

  • @drsuarezneuro
    @drsuarezneuro 10 місяців тому

    Which one for video this one or 2.8 mk ii?

  • @michaelgondokusumo5336
    @michaelgondokusumo5336 8 днів тому

    How compare with 70-200GM 1 for quality ? which one is better for G2 with GM1 ?

  • @hughjohns9110
    @hughjohns9110 11 місяців тому

    It looks great but I wish they had made the tripod foot the same as on the 200-600 and 70-200!

  • @angelathomas2117
    @angelathomas2117 11 місяців тому +5

    I really like this new lens but I just got the Tamron 70-180 not long ago 😒 I also just got the Sony 24-70 f2.8 ii so think I have spent to much as this is just a hobby ☺

    • @Kunal0915
      @Kunal0915 11 місяців тому

      That Tamron is still a better deal I suppose. Letting in twice the light.

    • @angelathomas2117
      @angelathomas2117 11 місяців тому

      @@Kunal0915 Yes I agree I do like the Tamron lenses since they a much lighter for walking around

  • @williamdavidson1490
    @williamdavidson1490 11 місяців тому +1

    Why? Why doesn't Sony put an Arca Swiss Plate on the Sony Tripod Assembly?

  • @PatrickWithCamera
    @PatrickWithCamera 20 днів тому

    Nice lens! Wish it was longer focal and darker, would insta buy for aps-c, 200mm is a bit too short for my use and teleconverter kills quality too hard on aps-c.

  • @gori_maheswari8994
    @gori_maheswari8994 11 місяців тому +1

    Very good looking 😊

  • @creativeyoutubertamil
    @creativeyoutubertamil 11 місяців тому +3

    1st like 1st view 1st comment i want the feiyu pocket camera

  • @teachingrounds
    @teachingrounds 11 місяців тому

    If you were a going to buy one lens for landscape/portraits/travel and you were choosing between this lens and the amazing Sony 135 GM 1. 8, which would you pick? They are both the same price and i can’t afford both.

    • @Bodorean
      @Bodorean 11 місяців тому

      Get the Samyang 135. Its almost as good as the GM, a third of the cost.

    • @StefanMalloch
      @StefanMalloch  11 місяців тому +2

      Portraits I love a 135mm. Landscape and travel, I would rather a wider zoom.

    • @frankfeng2701
      @frankfeng2701 11 місяців тому +1

      70-200 GM II for me, worth every penny.

  • @Hippiehansie
    @Hippiehansie 11 місяців тому +1

    And another hype!

    • @StefanMalloch
      @StefanMalloch  10 місяців тому

      Just my experience. Nothing more.

  • @FactNight
    @FactNight 11 місяців тому +1

    Will the bokeh come out nice as close to f2.8 ?

    • @StefanMalloch
      @StefanMalloch  11 місяців тому +1

      It has 9 aperture blades so bokeh quality is very nice for me. Not quite at the F2.8 level but you also get the macro ability and compression there looks very nice. Check out my photo examples

    • @FactNight
      @FactNight 11 місяців тому

      @@StefanMalloch Can u please compare normal as well as portrait photography of these two lens & also night time photos & videos capacity 🙏🏻🤩

  • @FactNight
    @FactNight 11 місяців тому +1

    Should i buy f4 or f2.8 version 1 ?

  • @architecture_logs
    @architecture_logs 11 місяців тому +2

    does a tc fits it? what a review is that? the old 70-200 g couldn't work with a tc..

  • @kenfjx
    @kenfjx 10 місяців тому

    should i get this or F2.8 GM ii?

  • @VeeTravels
    @VeeTravels 11 місяців тому +3

    Why is there no aperture ring? I find this one of the most important things while doing either photography or video.

    • @architecture_logs
      @architecture_logs 11 місяців тому

      why does it cost so much?

    • @POVwithRC
      @POVwithRC 11 місяців тому

      Nice to see you. No ring? Same as the old F4 70-200. The bigger story is why does it almost tickle the cost of the 2.8?

    • @StefanMalloch
      @StefanMalloch  11 місяців тому +1

      @@POVwithRC $1700 vs $2800?

    • @VeeTravels
      @VeeTravels 11 місяців тому

      @@StefanMalloch Yeah true dat!

  • @Kunal0915
    @Kunal0915 11 місяців тому

    Isn't the Tamron 70-180 f2.8 a better deal at half the price?

    • @StefanMalloch
      @StefanMalloch  11 місяців тому

      Depends on your needs. Sony is smaller, sharper and more versatile with macro capabilities.

  • @blimages2
    @blimages2 11 місяців тому +1

    Can I use for wildlife photo or video

    • @StefanMalloch
      @StefanMalloch  11 місяців тому +1

      For sure. A little short in terms of focal length but an incredible performer!

    • @blimages2
      @blimages2 11 місяців тому

      @@StefanMalloch thanks

  • @snoopywalker1881
    @snoopywalker1881 11 місяців тому +1

    Is this better than the Sony 90 mm macro lens?

    • @StefanMalloch
      @StefanMalloch  11 місяців тому +1

      Its not a standard true 1:1 macro lens out of the box without the 2x tc so different beast imo.

  • @strippedlist
    @strippedlist 11 місяців тому

    If you turn on lens correction in camera distortion disappears?

    • @BenSussmanpro
      @BenSussmanpro 11 місяців тому

      How do you know?! The lens isn’t even on the market yet.

    • @strippedlist
      @strippedlist 11 місяців тому

      @@BenSussmanpro what i asked and what you answered, read my statement/question again

    • @strippedlist
      @strippedlist 11 місяців тому

      @@BenSussmanpro he just did a review of the lens, wtf????

  • @MunirChavla
    @MunirChavla 11 місяців тому +13

    Let’s be honest. It’s not just over 700grams. It is more like 800grams.

    • @StefanMalloch
      @StefanMalloch  11 місяців тому +2

      True I kinda misspoke and the weight in writing is at the same point.

    • @chrisshawcross7033
      @chrisshawcross7033 6 місяців тому

      Wow it's so heavy at 800g

  • @VeeTravels
    @VeeTravels 11 місяців тому

    I can see a lot of focus breathing at 3:09!

    • @evrythingis1
      @evrythingis1 6 місяців тому

      Yeah, it's a macro lens.....

    • @VeeTravels
      @VeeTravels 6 місяців тому

      @@evrythingis1 It will be hard to take focus bracketed shots and take video as a result!

    • @evrythingis1
      @evrythingis1 6 місяців тому

      @@VeeTravels If you want to rack a shot from macro to infinity without cropping the even a small percentage, or have the perspective change even slightly, ... then I guess? I mean, is that worth even mentioning? Why has everyone suddenly started acting like focus breathing matters on the internet, while in the real world it isn't a consideration of any significance for 99.99% of users?

  • @ingviva6995
    @ingviva6995 11 місяців тому +1

    ❤❤

  • @quantumuniverse4606
    @quantumuniverse4606 11 місяців тому +3

    I thought it was internal Zoom.

    • @POVwithRC
      @POVwithRC 11 місяців тому +1

      So did I. And I am sad that it is not.

    • @adrianwongmedia
      @adrianwongmedia 11 місяців тому +2

      I prefer it not to be because to fit in my camera bag better.

    • @quantumuniverse4606
      @quantumuniverse4606 11 місяців тому

      @@POVwithRCat least for me, now it's clear to buy FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II it's faster and more premium quality.

  • @frankfeng2701
    @frankfeng2701 11 місяців тому +1

    At this price and size, I wish they made the focal range 50-200 or 70-280, even at the expense of losing the teleconverter compatibility and some macro capabilities, and kept the aperture ring like on all new G lenses. For now, the value of this lens is at most 4/5.

    • @chrisshawcross7033
      @chrisshawcross7033 6 місяців тому

      Some people just never happy
      Sony cant please everybody can they

  • @paulchiu
    @paulchiu 10 місяців тому +1

    Sony did not include a case with this FE 70-200mm f/4 Macro G OSS II Lens. Seriously cheap Sony!

  • @TheOneMonk
    @TheOneMonk 6 місяців тому

    Too expensive for a f4.

    • @evrythingis1
      @evrythingis1 6 місяців тому +1

      Really cheap for a 140mm-400mm macro lens though.

  • @architecture_logs
    @architecture_logs 11 місяців тому

    Ha! you can get the 70-200m1 + 90mm macro for less the price :D silly

  • @sh1209macro
    @sh1209macro 10 місяців тому +4

    This is definitely not a macro lens. A Macro lens is a true 1:1 throughout the focal range. In my opinion anyone would be better served spending their money on a 100-400mm Sony lens than this one. This lens is in no way worth $1700. This is more like a $1200 lens and I am definitely a hard pass on it. Sony wants you to buy a teleconverter to make this a true macro lens and then you’re over $2000 into a cheap lens.

    • @StefanMalloch
      @StefanMalloch  10 місяців тому +5

      100-400GM is a lot more expensive with a much bigger footprint, more range and also no macro capabilities. Not sure those are comparable and in the end the best lens depends on ones needs.

    • @sh1209macro
      @sh1209macro 10 місяців тому +2

      @@StefanMalloch not sure how you figure such a large footprint I have the 70-200 GM2 lens and they’re the exact same size sitting beside each other on the table. The 100-400 is .36 magnification and with the 1.4 teleconverter is the same magnification as the new lens half macro you are referring to with a focal range of 560mm at f/8. In order for this new lens to be a true macro lens at 1:1 you also have to buy a $500 teleconverter to go along with it then you are the same price basically as the 100-400 which is a far superior lens. You’re right it depends on one’s needs but this new lens is absolutely not worth $1700. This lens should be no more than $12-$1300 max for what you’re getting.

    • @MrWilson2002
      @MrWilson2002 7 місяців тому

      i got mine for $1300, only reason i pulled the trigger. I purchased it along side the tamron 70-180 2.8 G2 to compare @@sh1209macro

    • @evrythingis1
      @evrythingis1 6 місяців тому

      @@sh1209macro This thing is a 140-400mm 1:1 macro lens if you want it to be, that alone makes it literally the only lens of it's type, and can command any price they want. Go ahead and look up what a 200mm or 400mm 1:1 macro lens costs and get back to me.

    • @jackjin1623
      @jackjin1623 5 місяців тому +2

      @@sh1209macro In my case, this lens suits me perfectly. I need a 70-200 to extend from my already existing 24-70, however the GM2 is too large to fit in my bag with the camera attached. I paid about $1k AUD less for the lens and 2x teleconverter from the early adopter package which is about $600 AUD less than GM2 by itself.
      So a 1:1 magnification, small form factor, great quality lens for what I paid for, I have no complain. If was any other lens, I’d be less satisfied. So there isn’t a wrong lens, just wrong needs.

  • @bamsemh1
    @bamsemh1 11 місяців тому

    It's still just a zoom, with macro features. Stop confusing people with thinking they get a macro lens because the zoom has macro name on it. They are still just close-up lenses.

    • @evrythingis1
      @evrythingis1 10 місяців тому +4

      The lens has a flat field and was deigned for macro performance. You know that it's a 140-400mm F8 with 1:1 macro when you put the 2x converter on it right?