Paul Theroux interview (1998)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 лют 2025
  • Paul Theroux, author of "Sir Vidia's Shadow," discusses the beginning and end of his friendship with writer and mentor V.S. Naipaul.
    Join us on Patreon! / manufacturingintellect
    Donate Crypto! commerce.coinb...
    Share this video!
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 31

  • @ManufacturingIntellect
    @ManufacturingIntellect  7 років тому +1

    Join us on Patreon! www.patreon.com/ManufacturingIntellect
    Donate Crypto! commerce.coinbase.com/checkout/868d67d2-1628-44a8-b8dc-8f9616d62259
    Share this video!

  • @tomraw4893
    @tomraw4893 2 роки тому +1

    I like the book. I feel the long friendship was full of tension, for Theroux, but like a drug, he needed it.

  • @sunganti1
    @sunganti1 2 роки тому +1

    Paul Theroux at his best at marketing his soul.

  • @AliHussain-fz7pd
    @AliHussain-fz7pd 4 роки тому +1

    "Well that's a steaming pile of parrot droppings" lol. It would be dishonest to say that Ive read the book, but it is nice to see a writer delivering an impassioned defense of his book & critiquing the critics for a change.

  • @stephensharp3033
    @stephensharp3033 7 років тому +1

    He says a biography is inevitable autobiography. V.S Naipaul is the Jack Benny of literature.

  • @anuradhainamdar8967
    @anuradhainamdar8967 4 роки тому +6

    Theroux doesn't give a hoot to the reviewers.

  • @tbwatch88
    @tbwatch88 4 роки тому +2

    despite what old Paul says here, it's quite hard for artists to be friends with artists--esp. when one outstrips the other in terms of sales/fame. Naipaul (I have read everything he's ever written) was by all accounts nasty and immeasurably proud. Theroux (whose stuff I've read a lot) was CHUMS with such a person--opportunistically, hopefully, sycophantically. what'd anybody expect. later on, they patched it up. one's put in mind of Ted Hughes writing "Stare at the monster"--apropos of the poet. beware the artist--he or she's often a nasty piece of work. and it does not matter--on account of it's the WORK that matters to posterity; the character, the morals--those matter to family, and to God.

  • @sterlinghayden4096
    @sterlinghayden4096 6 років тому +2

    Michiko kakutani like a. "eunuch in a harem " a good one.

    • @furdiebant
      @furdiebant 5 років тому

      Sterling Hayden Kakutani is an infy

  • @sterlinghayden4096
    @sterlinghayden4096 6 років тому +1

    It is a great read about writers and the details. . .of course it contains plenty of snubs.

  • @mufcmufc111
    @mufcmufc111 8 років тому +4

    Thought, theroux , excellent, I read the book and of course he did so much for naipaul too , think not easy to put up with such a freeloader for so long

  • @erik_carter_art
    @erik_carter_art 3 роки тому +1

    Why does he have an English accent? Wasn't he born and raised in Massachusetts?...

    • @williemays2
      @williemays2 3 роки тому +1

      -- 'Tis a weird accent that is seldom found in the armpits of the extreme North Eastern States, such as Maine, northern New Hampshire and in his case, Boston, MA -----

    • @erik_carter_art
      @erik_carter_art 3 роки тому +1

      @@williemays2 Idk, I was born and raised in MA, and lived in Boston for 6 years. I never heard a local speak with his accent. 😅

    • @mookie7688
      @mookie7688 3 роки тому +2

      @@erik_carter_art He did live in England for at least 20 years. His accent's probably a bit of a mashup.

  • @eugeniogil5673
    @eugeniogil5673 7 років тому

    Que bello hombre.

  • @V5mGpYp
    @V5mGpYp 4 роки тому +1

    An odd mix of the old Northeastern US (Yankee Ivy League) Patrician accent (as most exemplified by William F Buckley) combined with hints of very faint British influence. What strikes me most is that he speaks so quickly with thoughts that sometimes seem unfinished or available for editing 5 seconds later. It must be how he writes. No editor however on this program. Naipaul has been roundly thrashed by his own countrymen for roundly thrashing his native land. So...maybe in the end someone holding a mirror up (regardless of distortion) was a bit much to take.

    • @anodyne57
      @anodyne57 4 роки тому

      As Theroux notes, Naipul has said nary a word in the wake of publication. The break came before he began the book.

  • @bonnyhenderson7776
    @bonnyhenderson7776 7 років тому +4

    He's great but I am glad I didn't run into him on a train in Russia or a bnb in England.........

  • @nickprohoroff3720
    @nickprohoroff3720 2 роки тому +1

    Charlie Rose was as shallow and irrelevant as the critics he quoted. And still is.

  • @pn5721
    @pn5721 2 роки тому

    I shall never read his book what a traitor I love V. S. Naipaul

  • @ramavinvar
    @ramavinvar 3 роки тому

    Naipaul must have suffered a lot waiting for a moment of pause in this man's endless rubbish.

  • @sunganti1
    @sunganti1 2 роки тому

    Theroux at his best at selling his soul.

  • @remarkableshailesh
    @remarkableshailesh 8 років тому

    like his non-fiction

  •  4 роки тому

    Paul Theroux is a turncoat he uses a person then turn around and bashes then 0n the head it takes an Englishman to do this

  • @robertbabstock1126
    @robertbabstock1126 6 років тому +1

    Charlie Rose. Eye dead.

  • @redpat8832
    @redpat8832 6 років тому +1

    Ego, ego, ego...

    • @furdiebant
      @furdiebant 5 років тому

      Infy comment

    • @dasfernandez1089
      @dasfernandez1089 6 місяців тому

      V.S Naipaul had been a suppressed soul all his life..And all his writing was mere paying tribute to the 'Suppressed indiduals ' whose struggle the writer dwelled on...leisurely....!!!