All LoL Team Compositions Explained | A Guide to Draft Picks | Izento Feature

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 бер 2023
  • A guide to building competitive team compositions, drawing from pro play in LCS, LCK, LPL, AND LEC. How to get the most out of draft building, we go over drafts, win conditions and goals.
    Twitter: @ggIzento
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @bottle_patate9524
    @bottle_patate9524 Рік тому +23

    this video didn't made a lot of view but for people like me that are learning macro, that's really interesting to understand better the games we play

  • @TowerFantasy-xz5ym
    @TowerFantasy-xz5ym Рік тому +24

    1:10 - Zone Control Team
    4:11 - Front-to-Back Team
    6:41 and 10:01 and 15:21 - Split Team
    7:58 - Poke Team
    12:53 - Pick Team
    14:50 - Protect Team

  • @ddd-op5wy
    @ddd-op5wy Рік тому +11

    Thanks for this! I got tired of my teammates in champ select saying that we've got a bad comp, or the enemy has a good comp, and me not understanding anything about that. So here I am!

  • @metalhead1948
    @metalhead1948 4 місяці тому +2

    Very informative and easy to digest video. Thank you

  • @taigatheslayer2434
    @taigatheslayer2434 Рік тому +5

    insane video bro❤

  • @aneeshsoni6752
    @aneeshsoni6752 Рік тому +5

    Thanks! I just demoted to Bronze anyway

  • @pollenskins
    @pollenskins Рік тому +1

    Good vid

  • @Julian-7X
    @Julian-7X Рік тому +1

    super!

  • @crazysans3311
    @crazysans3311 Місяць тому

    10:35 turret durability is a joke nowadays XD, great video I learnt a lot :D

  • @mescellaneous
    @mescellaneous Рік тому +1

    i feel like everyone reads comps wrong. most importantly, comps are not black and white like "poke comp". a simple example is that if every poke champ oneshot any enemy, that does not say anything about the game theory aspect, but only that poke champs are broken. likewise, if poke champs did zero damage, that would instantly make "poke comps" super weak.
    so that is to highlight that 5 champs in a "poke comp" have more than just poke abilities, so having a blanket term for only one type of ability (poke) describe 5 champs doesn't describe the whole picture. and even simpler example is if you have 4 poke champs and you put an enchanter on sup, you have a "poke comp". but what of the *sustain* abilities on the sup? you can't just ignore details just to continue saying "poke comp". nobody breaks down comps granular enough to discuss these nuances. i doubt these comp archetypes are how the best teams think about the game. that might still be how the west thinks about it, but not the east.

    • @fezthedracky8468
      @fezthedracky8468 Рік тому +1

      The east also dont tend to think too much, like many pros admit to just kinda skipping any sort of drafting phase, and decision making is "well i saw this pro better than me do it" without asking why theyre making that decision

    • @beestmode88beast
      @beestmode88beast Рік тому +2

      he literally said go watch ls for more explanation on team comps. This isn't a relevant comment to the video.

    • @kylebiesecker7800
      @kylebiesecker7800 10 місяців тому +1

      the name of the comp is the win condition of the comp.. the comp should try to do what the name says, that is all

    • @mescellaneous
      @mescellaneous 10 місяців тому

      @@kylebiesecker7800 that's not really analysis. how do you manage to get the "name of the comp" in the first place? sounds like results based voodoo. you just "know"? or is it like i already said.. you only call it a poke comp cause it has poke champs? and if that's the line of thinking, i already explained why it's completely useless, not to mention super elementary thinking.
      you should be able to answer what does poke counter and what counters poke, poke as an individual trait. if not, it sounds like your idea of drafting is just "okay we lost on a pOkE cOmP. maybe let's try a FrOnT tO bAcK cOmP next!"
      it's insufficient. i would even argue that the west already know about "poke comps" and "front to back" as much as anyone could. they know it like the back of their hand, and they lose because it's completely useless knowledge and doesn't work.

    • @Basto0o
      @Basto0o 9 місяців тому +5

      ​​​@@mescellaneouswell i dont see It that way. I cant talk for eastern players because i dont speak their language but i watch streams and videos from pro players and analysts and they do use terms like "poke comp" or "front to back".
      You call team comps by these names because they define the strenghts and win conditions they have. When you play a poke comp not all your champions are going to poke, some of them will compensate the poke champions weaknesses (with disengage for example), some others might not even fit so well in the comp but you pick them because they are op in the current meta, they are a counter to an enemy champion or your desired champion was banned. But still It is essential for a team comp to have champions that work with similar dynamics.
      If the champions of a team want to do diferent things, they wont be able to work together efficiently and most times wont make a good comp.
      For example if you pick a malphite and a wukong who want to engage and an ezreal and a xerath who want to poke them slowly and keep distance they wont be able to play for their strengths, when malphite and wukong jump on the enemies with their ults ezreal and xerath wont have the burst damage and follow up tools to finish them, in the others hands, if they had an orianna and a Samira things would work much better.
      Ofcourse that giving comps names wont give all the information about a specific team comp, but they are still usefull to identify it quickly and resume its dynamics.