0:26: A small exposure can cause a "heart attack" (technically, an arrhythmia) because the fluoride ions create insoluble salts with calcium and magnesium, depleting blood calcium levels. This can cause hypocalcemia and hyperkalemia which lead to cardiac arrhythmias.
Many years ago, you could buy a glass etching compound from craft stores. There was no warning of the consequences of exposure, just instructions to thoroughly irrigate any exposed skin. This may explain why by the age of 40 I experienced arrhythmia (and to this day) requiring daily medication. The active ingredient was hydrofluoric acid.
Complete nonsense. MgF2 and CaF2 are soluble at the concentrations of Mg and Ca found in the body. A lethal dose is 5-10 grams of fluoride. Lower doses cause nausea. Chronic poisoning with low doses causes bone deformations.
@@jpdemer5 5 grams of fluoride isn't really that much when we're talking about a liquid spill. Unfortunately, HF readily penetrates skin, so in severe incidents, amputation of limbs is required. Even if you don't die, the fluoride messes with your metabolism and blocks enzyme functions. You don't have to render Mg or Ca insoluble to cause issues. Drastically slowing down reaction rates in your metabolism is definitely enough to get you into trouble.
As a chemist who has been repeatedly using HF in the past two years, I am surprised they chose to use sodium carbonate to neutralize it. Not only is sodium fluoride still an unsafe chemical, as the fluorine is still weakly bound, but the bubbling can lead to an HF/NaF mist. I, personally, use a large amount of water with some calcium chloride or nitrate dissolved in it. There's no bubbling, all the fluorides precipitate as harmless calcium fluoride, and the dilute acid resulting from it can simply be disposed of as any aqueous acidic solution. (although we still use a separate waste container labelled "Hydrofluoric acid waste" for it). In general, I think calcium salts should always be used in neutralizing HF.
RedInferno112 Because calcium hydroxide has very low solubility in water, and is also corrosive anyway. Plus, it is sold as a fine dust, which I really don't like to handle.
piranha031091 Solubility is irrelevant here. Calcium hydroxide will happily react with hydrofluoric acid to form calcium fluoride and water. After all, hydrochloric acid will react with calcium carbonate, yet that has low solubility. Calcium fluoride is a much safer byproduct of the nutralisation of HF because it is so insoluble.
breakbumper Solubility IS relevant, since it means you won't be able to dissolve much of it in the solution you prepare for neutralizing the HF. It would be irrelevant if applied as a powder directly on the HF. This is not what I do : I use a large beaker filled with the calcium solution in which I dip all the contaminated labware.
breakbumper If the reaction product is insoluble isn't there a risk the reaction won't go to completion, it would get passivated by a thin layer of the fluoride salt. I vaguely recall if you put calcium carbonate in sulphuric acid you got a disappointing short fizz then the reaction was stopped by a barrier layer of sulphate
I have a theory as to why a neat break was formed at the point where the liquid meets the air. I think it's because at the point where the lamp is exposed to air will be the hottest, as there is no liquid to carry the heat away. Only air, which is a better insulator. So just where the liquid meets the air, you have an increased reaction rate due to the heat. I think that if the bulb was off, then the glass would have been dissolved more evenly. I may be completely wrong, but that's my theory. Would appreciate any input on what others think of this.
If the bulb was off, wouldn't the inherent strain in the material fracture it along the line where thin transitioned to thick? One way to find out, I suppose...
I was thinking along those lines aswell, I think that would have been a major part in it. I think that the tension(inherent) in the glass, would make it crack neatly because the weakened area was like a ring around the bulb. Not unlike cutting in glass. Another way to test it could be to put the bulb at a different angle into the HF.
Nikolaj Lund Madsen I like your idea about submerging the bulb at a different angle in the HF. That would certainly determine if it was due to the manufacturing of the glass, or the angle of submersion. It would be good to see a range of experiments. All using the same strength of solution, and same brand/batch of bulbs. Maybe they could do submerged straight and angled whilst off in solution, and then submerged at an angle whilst on. This way there would be more control and something to act as a base reference. This way, in total four experiments would be executed (including this one).
+VIIXM3 Neil looks like the type of guy who used to work at a secret government facility but now is placed at somewhere he will not draw much attention and he is supposed to keep quite about his previous work. That's why we never see him speak.
Well hello there Mr. Jim! Nice to see you! My father used to work as a chemical engineer before he was a nuclear physicist and he worked with a man who got a little drop of HF on his face and minutes later suffered a nasty stroke, which then brought about the ensuing heart attack. This even with all of the proper safety gear on, but back then not everyone had full face shields and he had on a pair of lab glasses. He did survive but he was never able to return to work. Thank you to the members of the chemistry department of the University of Nottingham for all of the wonderful videos that you produce. I watch these now and fondly remember the countless hours that I had spent with my father doing some similar (and some of the same) experiments in the lab. Happy Christmas to you all and best wishes for a Prosperous New Year in 2015 - I look forward to the new videos to come!
It would be funny if it doesn't dissolve. It's that hard. Just kidding, of course it would dissolve. It would take some protection around it though. HF acid could go flying along with shards of glass.
HF was always one of the most worrying compounds I've ever worked with professionally (for etching of InGaAs DFB chip wafers), even compared to the others I've had the pleasure of dealing with (Arsine, phosphine, hydrogen sulphide, TMI, DEZ, TMG, white phosphorus, aqua regia...). The only substance that came close to worrying me in any real way was Bromine, it's as though you can see the evil in the vapours as they pour down the bottle on standing in a fume cupboard. We had a dedicated HF response team to deal with accidents and were required to carry calcium gluconate gel at all times, even at home!
Yup was that a Boston Lasers by any chance? Yup the gases fed to the MOCVD machine were pretty horrible chemicals, toxic,corrosive, spontaneously combustible, or all at once. Generally they were diluted in neon gas but still 😲😲😲. Once the PH3 bottle became almost disconnected from the manifold and leaked causing a total evacuation. Thankfully the under pressure safety mechanism tripped and prevented extremely costly damage to the chip baker. 🤓
When I was in university, I had a summer job in the quality control lab of a cement factory in the UK. This was in 1969, and we routinely used HF as a reagent. In platinum crucibles, if I recall correctly... I don't remember exactly what test we were doing, but I assume it was something to do with dissolving out the silicate component of the cement. Nobody seemed especially scared of the stuff, apart from the standard lab precautions for strong acids. Guess health and safety standards weren't so stringent back then...! Fortunately there was never an accident... during my tour of duty, at least....
I hope I never have to work with HF. A chemistry professor of mine once told me a story about his own personal experience with it. He inadvertently dipped his fingers into a very dilute HF solution, for "barely even a second or so", and ended up losing the fingernails on his thumb and index fingers as a result, besides being put into what he said was the worst pain he'd ever felt.
Its true it destroys nerves it denatures proteins and had huge toxicity level that could give you a heart attack at the touch of it. Its messes with your bones which produce a lot of things blood cells the lot.
The reason may not be, that its so dangerous (There are alot of chemists with proper safety accessories), the true reason may be that the acid is really REALLY hard to get.
I did experiments using HF at the university. Everyone was crazy paranoid about it and there was extreme safety precautions - including mandatory safety lecture, keycard access and mandatory announcements to the whole area every time the HF was out and in use.
ABOlsen69666 Aalborg University. It was a postgraduate project, where we tried to show electroluminescence in pourous silicon. We used HF to produce the porous silicon.
I've been on a chemistry binge, and was wondering while watching a video "why doesn't glass react with anything?". After 15 minutes I have read an article and watched a video demonstrating it. The internet is an amazing thing!
Used to work in a wafer fab clean room. HF was poured into big long baths (about 50 gallons) and we would carefully slide quartz glass tubes into the acid (they had handles on their sides) after a while they were removed having being cleaned because of etching effect. Once me and my workmate forgot about one and when we went back to the bath the tube had completely dissolved!! Very powerful stuff and not to be mishandled.
Dear Professor Poliakoff, Many thanks to you and your team for the wonderful und always very interesting videos you post on UA-cam. I have a question concerning the experiment with the light bulb in hydrofluoric acid. Could the neat crack in the bulb not be caused by the temperature difference between the free part and the submerged and thereafter 'liquid cooled' part of the bulb? It would be interesting to see if the same thing happens even with a light bulb partially submerged in simple water. Yours sincerely, Luca Cettuzzi
I wondered if this was the stuff I had to handle in military, because of the whole _"One drop on your skin can kill you"_ since that's what we were told too. But I looked it up and it was *HCN* that we had tiny vials of, in case of some form of emergency... can't recall what, since it was over a decade ago. It's not fun to handle dangerous chemicals, so I fully understand Neil's concern here.
0:39 Yes, I've figured out why Neil is expendable. Incidentally its also the same reason you do not ever allow him to speak on camera. There's only one logical conclusion: Neil is Australian.
HF is extremely dangerous. One drop on your skin and your bones are doomed. You can never be too careful when dealing with it. There was an accident in a Chinese high school. A chemistry teacher arranged an experiment session for students to play with HF (I know, WTF?) without proper protection (again, WTF?). Some students accidentally dropped some HF on their hands and the teacher was like "that's ok. Just wash with water you'll be fine" (Whaat?). It was not until 36 hours later that those students were sent to a hospital. The best time for treatment had already been past by then.
eeeeh. I don't know about one drop and you're *doomed*. But certainly requires a trip to the hospital and immediate action, not to mention necrosis and extreme pain. But one drop won't kill or permanently injure you. The margin for error is pretty slim though, especially if you don't get calcium glutamate on you right away.
xtamared Of course I did't mean it can doom all of your bones or doom you as a whole person. It depends on the amount of HF you are exposed to. But at least the tissues and bones in the immediate area of exposure will be ruined. F- will bond with all Ca2+ in your bones and form insoluble calcium fluoride (hence ruining your bones). That's why the treatment of HF poisoning always involving calcium gluconate. It doesn't matter what concentration the HF solution is. And less informed person would assume it is safe to play with low concentration HF. That's why it's so dangerous.
xtamared from what I was informed by my Chemistry coordinator is that it's a sharp initial pain then pretty much no pain because the HF kills the nerve endings quickly. The HF then begins degradation of the nervous system caused by the Calcium ion pumps that are on the axon terminals, interfering with pre and post synaptic transmission.
We need a proper episode about Neil soon. He puts his fingers/lungs/face/self on the line every time we get to see a video of a cool reaction. What's more, he's the one stuck cleaning up after all of them, and I feel that the chemistry of neutralizing/cleaning up after an awesome reaction is just as interesting as the reaction itself. I can imagine many other Periodic Videos viewers feel the same way. Love the vids Brady, thanks for doing what you do and please take this comment into consideration! after all, Neil is kinda your stig :P
+Tom DuBois if you're willing to watch it there's a doc on YT about some serial killer who had a bunch of bodies melting away in drums, pretty disturbing. there's also an episode of breaking bad that will give you more info on this subject lol.
Hipotetically, HF is hard to get and too dangerous to handle, i'll use a cincentrated aqueous solution of NaOH instead, because i'ts a lot cheaper and relatively less dangerous to handle and still can dissolve a body with no problem
Not a single idea on why the glass broke that way? No actual physicists here? I'll take a crack at it (not a physicist). The HF dissolved a lot of the glass away on the bottom, thinning it out. The heat from the filament combined with the heat of the reaction caused it to expand - whereas the glass on the top, still thick, could absorb more heat energy and didn't expand as much. The glass broke at the line of thinning, and stayed in tact where it was thicker.
Differential cooling... you have this intense heat generating bulb sat in a liquid, gets thin enough to where the smallest pulsation causes it to go pop, and due to how glass fractures thats why its not a perfect ring
I had taken part into an experiement where we dissolved beakerglass (broken pieces) in heated oleum (conc. sulfuric acid). The glass were "dissolved" only from the rough broken edges and the "flat surfaces" stayed mostly intact.
My physics teacher once got hydrofluoric acid on his finger... The acid was immediately absorbed into his finger. Within days, the entire end of his finger had turned black, and a doctor suggested injecting a basic solution throughout his finger to neutralize it. He hates needles, so knowing this was the only fix, he just waited it out. Eventually all of the acid went to his bone and was neutralized. He's about 60 years old and still has all of his fingers, so I guess it worked.
It reacts with calcium in the blood. Calcium ions are used by the body to generate action potentials (electrical pulses) hence nerve function in vitally important organs such as the heart may become disabled.
The HF passes through the skin and the fluoride (F-) anions react with calcium (Ca2+ cations and precipitate out as the insoluble calcium fluoride (CaF2). This drop in calcium levels wreaks havoc on the functioning of your heart and nervous system. (nerves send impulses by pumping ions in and out of the cells)
the fluorine in HF dissociates and binds with free calcium and magnesium ions in the blood stream. in high concentration mixtures (50% and above) the lethal dose is really quite low (7ml of anhydrous HF is enough to bind up all the calcium ions in the average adult male), but even low concentrations can have an effect, if 1% of our body surface area is exposed (this causes a pocket of this hypocalcemic and magnesmic state to follow along the blood stream and cause a similar result to a more significant exposure ) (1% of your BSA is roughly equivalent to the palm of your hand)
In a previous career a long time ago, I worked in a lab while in college as a student chemist. My job was to prep metal alloys for analysis by the lead chemists. Some of the metal alloys are used in jet engines, the shuttle program, and nuclear industry and contain quite array of elements to produce the desired properties. Some of these alloys were high in silicon, and I had to use a mixture of HCL, HNO3, and HF in order to dissolve the alloy to perform analysis on an AA spectrograph. We used Teflon beakers because of the HF. I was always careful of HF because its a weak acid and you can't wash it off very easily if you get it on your skin, but the acid that all the chemists feared the most, and the one I treated very carefully was perchloric acid. It can go BOOM!
Call themselves chemists yet dont know that borosilicate glass (lightbulbs, beakers, test tubes) is resistant to HF. The only thing I am supprized about is that it got through as fast as it did.
+David Crawford The plastic used to contain it is produced in a different manner than other materials, even though they would have the same polymer formula. The thicker the folding, the more opaque and less pliable any given plastic will be.
David Crawford The plastic is opaque because it is durable. If it was more transparent, there would be too many imperfections in the container; it wouldn't, well contain the hydrofluoric acid.
David Crawford Watch some educational videos about the production of plastics, and you'll understand why materials like the container used for HF here, and plastic wrap can be composed of the same polymer, but have different properties due to how the plastic is manufactured.
You had a temperature differential between the exposed glass and the submerged glass. This sets up a stress in ordinary (soda-lime-silicate) glass and it separates at the interface. Try it with another thermally conductive fluid to make the bulb last longer.
Because it leaches calcium from your bones and system. Calcium is used as part of the signalling systems in your body. HF is pretty much the devil's piss.
Yeah, I had to look that up, too. Apparently, it dissolves through your skin until it gets to your bloodstream, at which point it interferes with your body's ability to utilize calcium. Calcium, by the way, is extremely important to generating nerve signals, so without it, your nerves stop working--including the ones that keep your heart beating. Hence, heart attack. Hydrofluoric acid is fun! :D
IceMetalPunk Yeah when I worked in a univ. Maintenance dept, handling the fume cupboard fans during repairs involved full body disposable coveralls, face shield, respirator, boots, gloves, etc, and calcium gluconate gel was always available just in case
I use to work on Watkins Johnson atmospheric glass deposition system for semi conductor manufacture. About every six months the glass would build up in the nitrogen injection muffle. We would install teflon covers and inject 50% HF into the N2 muffles and wait 2 hours to clean out the build up of glass. We always put on face shield, acid aprons, acid glove and had calcium glucomate nearby. It wasn't to scary when you take care and wear the proper PPE. I did hate that machine though.
I was so naive that in 1974, I bought a gallon of HF so that I could etch stuff in glass. In my apt I poured some HF into a plastic dish tub and dipped a piece of window glass that I had coated in wax and drew a design on. I let it sit for a while - I do not remember anything about the project or the results. I do remember that the kitchen window in that apt was not as clear as it used to be. I knew enough to wear gloves, not to pour the stuff down the drain (I think that I took it out into the alley and dumped it there), and have no idea what happened to the rest of the acid. I remember that a couple years later some friends and I set up a bronze kiln/foundry in a shed in back of the 3D household on Aloha street. That is the last place I remember seeing it - I think that place was torn down in 1979. But a little knowledge is a dangerous thing (later I learned about Velvet Etching Cream - much safer).
I once worked in a quality control lab in a fibreglass insulation factory where we used HF to clean platinum beakers used for trial melts. After soaking overnight in conc. HF the glass looked like sugar and could be washed from the crucible. One test we did was chemical durability of glass. It was ground to a very fine powder then heated in water with reflux. This dissolved some of the soda lime components of the glass which could be measured by titration with a phenolphthalein indicator. So in fact glass was being partly dissolved by plain water.
+DavidTheTech It reacts with calcium ions in your body, forming CaF2, which is insoluble and precipitates out of your blood. Calcium ions are essential to the contraction of muscles, including cardiac muscle.
Those fluorite crystals precipitate and act as cholesterol, blocking the arteries, possibly leading to pectoral anginas, aneurysms, strokes or heart attacks.
In terms of fast acting corrosive properties, it's actually considerably weaker than hydrochloric acid and sulphuric acid, and actually less quickly damaging than bases like caustic soda. The trouble is that it's really difficult to wash off because fluoride ions can seep through the skin, doing damage in the following hours after exposure. They can also spread around the body and infect all sorts of sensitive organs and tissues, which is what makes it so dangerous. What I'm saying is that putting your hand in caustic soda solution would more quickly damage it than in hydrofluoric acid - concentration/temperature being equal. The difference is that hydrofluoric acid would continue to damage under the skin (and possibly spread elsewhere) long after the hand has been removed.
Put more stuff in HF (i sound like a five year old, but i'm actually a nano-chemistry scientist). I'm really interested in its effect on different material. Or better so put stuff in PIRANHA (strongest acid there is, i won't disclose the ingredients because it is more dangerous that HF. Ppl who can use this information non-idioticaly already knows them.)
I mean strongest acid that normal people can get (or in this case make). Yeah some organic acids are extremely difficult to even contain. Aqua regia is very strong, but piranha is stronger.
Isn't it rather the temperature differece between the submerged part of the bulb and the part that isn't cooled by the liquid that causes the bulb to break exactly at the point where it is touching the surface? I'm not sure about what kind of glass is used for simple light bulbs like this one, but I can only assume that, since these bulbs are made from some sort of glass that can handle temperature changes quite well, since this kind of bulb heats up quite a bit when the light is turned on. For the time the bulb was submerged, the HF didn't seem to have much effect on the glass, although it was apparently clouded a bit and therefore thinned, to some degree in the area where it was submerged. I've seen some cases where a slow change in temperature in glass can cause very clean breaking points, even if no acid whatsoever is involved. Would be interesting to check the temperatures of the liquid and the part of the bulb that is in air, or repeat the experiment just using water or some other heat absorbing liquid, I predict that the result would be about the same.
In case anyone does not understand why the water level cut happened I am pretty sure i know the reason. the waterline was the hottest part of the bulb in contact with the HF solution. 1) The water was conducting heat away from the rest of the bulb more rapidly because the molecules had more directions to go to dissipate the heat. 2) The nitrogen in the bulb (yes its not a pure vacuum like most people think) carried heat convectively upwards. 3) the water on the outside of the bulb was also convecting upwards. The Higher temp sped up the reaction at the interface.
When I was young, I used to use a product for removing rust stains from fabric. It intended use was apparently to remove rust and other oxide stains from sails should a washer or bolt fall into the sail locker. It was removed from the market and I never understood why. All I knew about it at the time it had 10% HF on the bottle. When attempting to have the compound replicated I was told the 10% HF on your skin would leach the Calcium from your bones. I use a totally different method today.
this makes perfect sense, heat and acid create fractal points in hard surfaces. it's how hannibal crossed the alps. with heating the rock and adding vinegar it created micro fissions all through the rocky terrain, he paved a path through the mountains cleverly.
I've gotten that on me. Unbelievable how fast it burns you. I used to joke that when it lands on your forearm, you just have to look at the bottom of your arm and it'll fall right out after a second. Then you can whistle through it!
Many years ago I use to use Hydrofluoric Acid to etch on glass. Made wonderful art with it. You can purchase Hydrofluoric Acid in very diluted form for glass etching :)
Once found a lead bottle in an old house we were refurbishing. It had two concentric discoid protuberances at the neck. The top was unusual in that instead of a cork or lead stopper it had a small gilded perfume vial suspended by three or four tiny nails and embedded in the stopper. I could tell a liquid was inside. I was hesitant to try and open it. I left it in the back of an old Toyota pick up parked in front of my parents orchard while in college. I was unaware it had been ticketed for being immobile for too long and it was finally towed. I only paid $150 for it originally and didnt bother seeking it back. It was only later while perusing an old chemistry book I recognised the container for HF. I imagine the vial improvised into the stopper had a note inside warning of the danger of its contents. Then again, for all I know, the vial had nitroglycerin in it . . . iows, an improvised explosive device. I loath to think someone attempting to open it. More likely the kit and caboodle went into a compactor and recycled. Hope so.
I used to work with HF on a regular basis at an old job I had. Niel was wearing a lot less PPE than I wore while working with that vile stuff. At come concentrations it can eat the bone out from under your skin, so they say, and you have to get calcium gluconate shots directly into the burns to stop it from doing more damage.
My Chemistry Professor in College had a story about HF. According to him... Diluted HF is used to clean aluminum and specifically the aluminum sides of trucks. This solution was given you a guy and he was told to clean the trucks with it. So he proceeded to dip a sponge in it and wipe away at the truck. Without any sort of protective gloves or other gear. Supposedly the HF dissolved his bones in his arms and they had to be amputated. I always wondered if there was any truth to this story or if it was just a scary story to make us be cautious when handling the stuff in lab.
They did an experiment with HF using a chicken leg. It wasn't nearly as corrosive as believed so no, your story is not true. However he could have had to be amputated due to extreme nerve damage but he would have noticed nerve damage far before it spread to his arm.
+MoOrion It probably is true. I was trained to use HF. You may be exposed and not notice the exposure for up to 8 hours later. HF is anhydrous. If you get it on your skin, it absorbs and will dissolve your bone underneath. In the refinery, I mostly worked around Sulfuric Acid but they used to cross train on alkylation units in the Amoco, BP Amoco and now Marathon refinery in Texas City, Texas. About the time that the group of guys I hired in with joined the alkylation units they stopped cross training for safety concerns. They still sent a small Playmate cooler home with us on the Sulfuric Alkylation Unit with a cream and eye wash (calcium gluconate if I recall correctly) so if we started having symptoms of exposure, hours later, we could start applying the cream and/or eye wash on the way to the hospital. The staff at Mainland Hospital in Texas City was also trained on the hazards of HF. Marathon's smaller refinery (the only one they had in Texas City at the time) dropped a vessel onto a 6" HF vapor line and over 3,000 people in Texas City went to the ER. I would not do what this mad scientist did without being in a fully encapsulated suit with supplied fresh air.
The professor's endless flailing with his hands is driving me nuts hehe. I still listen to all the interesting stuff he says but I have to scroll down when he's in frame. =P
We use HF to clean our Quartz deposition tubes at work (HCL is used for both Quartz and Silicon Carbide diffusion tubes) as it literally strips a layer off of the inside of the tube. We also use it to strip the oxide off of the silicon wafers while leaving the doped silicon untouched. Great stuff, very dangerous. We use Calcium Gluconate gel as the antidote.
I'd really love to know what happened when HF rushed inside and dissolved the electrodes. Because of the alternating currents: is it possible that both electrodes get dissolved when they are either positive or negative as of the two poles of HF? What are the electrodes made of? Will the dissolving process be quicker in same or alternating current? Lots and Lots of questions :)
depending on your nationality they tend to be made from Tungsten or Wolfram (same element, 2 different names: element 'W'). I suspect that easily formed WFx compounds are pretty stable so it wouldn't do much I'm afraid.
In Halogen bulbs yes (I think, I thought it was Chlorine/chloride but I don't see why bromides or iodides wouldn't work as well...I did this kind of chemistry a very long time ago), but this one (in the video) is a normal, old school, incandescent bulb. Tungsten filament in a vacuum (or as close as is necessary to stop the filament burning out in less than a second) so the only halide species around is the fluoride from the HF, hence my thought that it's only be able to make WFx compounds. The WFx mightn't even be soluble (many metal fluorides aren't) so they'd passivate the filament surface.
I used to work with a mixture of Hydrofluoric Acid and Ammonia Chloride “to etch radio crystals” and someone got this mixture on there fingers one day. It was only there for a brief moment but, he said that it felt like his fingers where on fire for over a month.
The break along the surface is a result of chemical reactions with the atmosphere. Here is another example of this: Furnaces that are used to melt glass in large quantities are usually emptied and turned off after about 6-7years (about half their lifetime) so maintenance can be done on the inside. If you look at the surfaces on the inside you can then see very clearly that the surface decday of the ceramic bricks is much stronger in the area where the surface of the molten glass comes in contact with the atmosphere. You can see that the corrosion goes very deep into the bricks whereas only the surface is effected above and below that point.
Watching these videos I don't even notice 5 minutes have passed.... I was going to play stellaris at 10pm and its now 12:32am and the launcher for the game is still sitting there lol
What the experiment showed is that the corrosion of the glass is strongest right at the surface of the acid. Do the gasses in the air act like catalysts or does it have something to do with surface tension?
I'm no chemist, but my guess would be the water with the HF and then the glass in it would either be conductive or have a low enough breakdown voltage for the Ac to happily conduct through it. If you had an Ohmmeter with really cheap probes (hobbyist multimeter from a cheap catalog or store) you could probably test the solution and see how resistive it is, if you can find someone brave enough to stick the probes into it. Also, having seen a video on HF, it makes me wonder; are you guys covering some of the things from the Things I'll never work with? I seem to recall HF getting a lengthy writeup there. +1 for the awesome video and neat reaction!
Nobody probably cares, but a minor quibble with the assertion that the filament dissolved once exposed to HF: The filament is very fragile and doesn't survive well when the vacuum of the bulb is lost. In air, it oxidizes into crust and breaks very rapidly. In an aqueous solution, I think thermal shock would probably break it if the air didn't get it fast enough. In either case dissolution isn't the right way to describe the failure mode. Fun video.
I think you are putting everyone at risk by not using fully encapsulated suits with supplied air. I used to work around HF and I am very aware of the dangers.
mahin alam The entire submerged part of the bulb corroded, if you look at the remains you will see it being thinner than the rest. The reason for it breaking in a circle however, is (i think) because of the stress caused at the point where it transitions from thick (un-corroded) to thin (corroded), combined with heat from the bulb itself and the reaction.
Patrick Hansen I think it was the hottest at this place and it sped up the reaction. Below the surface HF took away the heat and above there was no HF.
Pretty sure the clean break was nothing chemistry related, just thermal shock due to difference in temp between hot glass above the liquid level and cool glass cooled by the liquid (possibly aided by the HF thinning the glass). Maybe do a control run with plain water? I guess the sparking at the end was a combination of a very small electric arc with hydrogen burning.
0:26: A small exposure can cause a "heart attack" (technically, an arrhythmia) because the fluoride ions create insoluble salts with calcium and magnesium, depleting blood calcium levels. This can cause hypocalcemia and hyperkalemia which lead to cardiac arrhythmias.
Thank you for explaining, i was going to ask how can a small exposure lead to a heart attack.
Many years ago, you could buy a glass etching compound from craft stores. There was no warning of the consequences of exposure, just instructions to thoroughly irrigate any exposed skin. This may explain why by the age of 40 I experienced arrhythmia (and to this day) requiring daily medication.
The active ingredient was hydrofluoric acid.
MrVeryCranky I wonder if you can sue the manufacturer... There must thousands of other people who are going through the same problems
Complete nonsense. MgF2 and CaF2 are soluble at the concentrations of Mg and Ca found in the body.
A lethal dose is 5-10 grams of fluoride. Lower doses cause nausea. Chronic poisoning with low doses causes bone deformations.
@@jpdemer5 5 grams of fluoride isn't really that much when we're talking about a liquid spill. Unfortunately, HF readily penetrates skin, so in severe incidents, amputation of limbs is required.
Even if you don't die, the fluoride messes with your metabolism and blocks enzyme functions. You don't have to render Mg or Ca insoluble to cause issues. Drastically slowing down reaction rates in your metabolism is definitely enough to get you into trouble.
As a chemist who has been repeatedly using HF in the past two years, I am surprised they chose to use sodium carbonate to neutralize it. Not only is sodium fluoride still an unsafe chemical, as the fluorine is still weakly bound, but the bubbling can lead to an HF/NaF mist.
I, personally, use a large amount of water with some calcium chloride or nitrate dissolved in it. There's no bubbling, all the fluorides precipitate as harmless calcium fluoride, and the dilute acid resulting from it can simply be disposed of as any aqueous acidic solution. (although we still use a separate waste container labelled "Hydrofluoric acid waste" for it).
In general, I think calcium salts should always be used in neutralizing HF.
RedInferno112
Because calcium hydroxide has very low solubility in water, and is also corrosive anyway. Plus, it is sold as a fine dust, which I really don't like to handle.
piranha031091
Solubility is irrelevant here. Calcium hydroxide will happily react with hydrofluoric acid to form calcium fluoride and water. After all, hydrochloric acid will react with calcium carbonate, yet that has low solubility. Calcium fluoride is a much safer byproduct of the nutralisation of HF because it is so insoluble.
breakbumper
Solubility IS relevant, since it means you won't be able to dissolve much of it in the solution you prepare for neutralizing the HF.
It would be irrelevant if applied as a powder directly on the HF.
This is not what I do : I use a large beaker filled with the calcium solution in which I dip all the contaminated labware.
breakbumper If the reaction product is insoluble isn't there a risk the reaction won't go to completion, it would get passivated by a thin layer of the fluoride salt.
I vaguely recall if you put calcium carbonate in sulphuric acid you got a disappointing short fizz then the reaction was stopped by a barrier layer of sulphate
piranha031091 Not if you intend to put solid calcium carbonate in the acid. The acid will happily react with it.
If it breaks it's physics. If it dies it's biology. If it explodes it's chemistry. If it turns on you it's sociology.
If it lies to you it is political science.
It it never does what you want it to it's computer science.
If it causes school shootings it's Minecraft and Tetris.
if it tells you deserve to be poor it's economics
if it tries to peek into your brain it's psychology
I have a theory as to why a neat break was formed at the point where the liquid meets the air.
I think it's because at the point where the lamp is exposed to air will be the hottest, as there is no liquid to carry the heat away. Only air, which is a better insulator.
So just where the liquid meets the air, you have an increased reaction rate due to the heat.
I think that if the bulb was off, then the glass would have been dissolved more evenly.
I may be completely wrong, but that's my theory.
Would appreciate any input on what others think of this.
Seems perfectly plausible to me! There would likely be some strain along the temperature gradient and eventually the material just couldn't hold it.
If the bulb was off, wouldn't the inherent strain in the material fracture it along the line where thin transitioned to thick?
One way to find out, I suppose...
I was thinking along those lines aswell, I think that would have been a major part in it.
I think that the tension(inherent) in the glass, would make it crack neatly because the weakened area was like a ring around the bulb. Not unlike cutting in glass.
Another way to test it could be to put the bulb at a different angle into the HF.
Nikolaj Lund Madsen I like your idea about submerging the bulb at a different angle in the HF. That would certainly determine if it was due to the manufacturing of the glass, or the angle of submersion.
It would be good to see a range of experiments. All using the same strength of solution, and same brand/batch of bulbs.
Maybe they could do submerged straight and angled whilst off in solution, and then submerged at an angle whilst on. This way there would be more control and something to act as a base reference. This way, in total four experiments would be executed (including this one).
I was thinking temperature gradient as well. Expansion and all that.
Neil is the guy I wanna be when I grow up.
When Neil breathes is Sarin neve gas , it kills the Sarin instantly.
+VIIXM3 Neil is what you get when you combine Igor and Chuck Norris.
+VIIXM3 Neil looks like the type of guy who used to work at a secret government facility but now is placed at somewhere he will not draw much attention and he is supposed to keep quite about his previous work. That's why we never see him speak.
TheDarkdrawn
The chemist protection program
TheDarkdrawn and they call him in when they have a problem so he keeps inconspicuously sneeking away
I love the smell of SARAN in the morning
How dare you torture my men. First you buy them as POWs from some sick market and then you do this. Despicable
Captain Lightbulb . Scary light bulb 😳
No offense sir, your men tend to crack under pressure.
I once popped a lightbulb, on purpose.
JustAnotherPanzer GASP
Captain Lightbulb I could smell the burned wires from a few centimeters away...
The prof. definitely looks like someone who would wake up thinking "What would happen if I shoved a lightbulb in some Hydrofluoric Acid?"
This man looks like science.
This was said in the other video.
+A Potato what?
+HermanoLaPotato he is science.. lol
unoriginal
Only heard this 500 times in each of his videos
Well hello there Mr. Jim! Nice to see you!
My father used to work as a chemical engineer before he was a nuclear physicist and he worked with a man who got a little drop of HF on his face and minutes later suffered a nasty stroke, which then brought about the ensuing heart attack. This even with all of the proper safety gear on, but back then not everyone had full face shields and he had on a pair of lab glasses. He did survive but he was never able to return to work.
Thank you to the members of the chemistry department of the University of Nottingham for all of the wonderful videos that you produce. I watch these now and fondly remember the countless hours that I had spent with my father doing some similar (and some of the same) experiments in the lab. Happy Christmas to you all and best wishes for a Prosperous New Year in 2015 - I look forward to the new videos to come!
Old chemistry professors never die, they just smell that way.
Here proving that experiments don't necessarily need to involve explosions and colour changes to be stunning.
Do this with a "prince ruperts drop". Tail or bulb first.
Excellent idea! I really want to see that!
I second this motion, but not the mess it might make.
It would be funny if it doesn't dissolve. It's that hard. Just kidding, of course it would dissolve. It would take some protection around it though. HF acid could go flying along with shards of glass.
HF was always one of the most worrying compounds I've ever worked with professionally (for etching of InGaAs DFB chip wafers), even compared to the others I've had the pleasure of dealing with (Arsine, phosphine, hydrogen sulphide, TMI, DEZ, TMG, white phosphorus, aqua regia...). The only substance that came close to worrying me in any real way was Bromine, it's as though you can see the evil in the vapours as they pour down the bottle on standing in a fume cupboard. We had a dedicated HF response team to deal with accidents and were required to carry calcium gluconate gel at all times, even at home!
I would rather deal with elemental bromine any day rather than HF, and I have made both. And I know of the safety and health risks of both.
I'm actually not even sure if HF would scare me more than Phosphine. Though I'd like to avoid both as best as possible.
Yup was that a Boston Lasers by any chance? Yup the gases fed to the MOCVD machine were pretty horrible chemicals, toxic,corrosive, spontaneously combustible, or all at once. Generally they were diluted in neon gas but still 😲😲😲. Once the PH3 bottle became almost disconnected from the manifold and leaked causing a total evacuation. Thankfully the under pressure safety mechanism tripped and prevented extremely costly damage to the chip baker. 🤓
Thank you for your tenacity and perseverance Neil! I hope the other Senior Chemists really appreciate your fortitude!
Note to self: In every circumstance, remain at all times, no lees than 1000 meters away from any and all Hydrofluoric Acid.
@cgdermot *LeEs.*
When I was in university, I had a summer job in the quality control lab of a cement factory in the UK.
This was in 1969, and we routinely used HF as a reagent. In platinum crucibles, if I recall correctly... I don't remember exactly what test we were doing, but I assume it was something to do with dissolving out the silicate component of the cement.
Nobody seemed especially scared of the stuff, apart from the standard lab precautions for strong acids.
Guess health and safety standards weren't so stringent back then...!
Fortunately there was never an accident... during my tour of duty, at least....
I hope I never have to work with HF. A chemistry professor of mine once told me a story about his own personal experience with it. He inadvertently dipped his fingers into a very dilute HF solution, for "barely even a second or so", and ended up losing the fingernails on his thumb and index fingers as a result, besides being put into what he said was the worst pain he'd ever felt.
I think HF destroys nerves, so in theory, he shouldn't have felt pain.
***** I'm pretty sure the nerves are damaged by third degree burns, not overstimulation.
hippiechickie18 The process of destroying a nerve is painful itself. And it's the last thing you ever feel with that nerve.
Its true it destroys nerves it denatures proteins and had huge toxicity level that could give you a heart attack at the touch of it. Its messes with your bones which produce a lot of things blood cells the lot.
Can you help me? Is hydrofluorosilicic acid the same as hydrofluoric Acid? if so, why is it used in our water supply? its toxic right?
you guys should do a video on fluoroantimonic acid
Yea I've been looking for a video on that... For some reason NO ONE has done it.
that's because it's nearly impossible to contain and too dangerous for human use
+rojva29 yes I know, Teflon is basically the only thing that can contain it. It would be dangerous but that's what makes it fun.
The reason may not be, that its so dangerous (There are alot of chemists with proper safety accessories), the true reason may be that the acid is really REALLY hard to get.
a ph balance of - 25
I did experiments using HF at the university. Everyone was crazy paranoid about it and there was extreme safety precautions - including mandatory safety lecture, keycard access and mandatory announcements to the whole area every time the HF was out and in use.
DTU? What kind of research?
ABOlsen69666 Aalborg University. It was a postgraduate project, where we tried to show electroluminescence in pourous silicon. We used HF to produce the porous silicon.
Brady, thank you, Neil, & the Prof for yet another great video.
4:20 Epic voice crack
After years and years, yes, we still would love to see formulas. Thank you.
Most feared acid: Hahahh
This guy: Let me put some electricity in it for fun.
Most feared acid: Gulp
I've been on a chemistry binge, and was wondering while watching a video "why doesn't glass react with anything?". After 15 minutes I have read an article and watched a video demonstrating it. The internet is an amazing thing!
Wow. I hope to see more of these experiments in the future, but stay safe everyone!
Used to work in a wafer fab clean room. HF was poured into big long baths (about 50 gallons) and we would carefully slide quartz glass tubes into the acid (they had handles on their sides) after a while they were removed having being cleaned because of etching effect. Once me and my workmate forgot about one and when we went back to the bath the tube had completely dissolved!! Very powerful stuff and not to be mishandled.
Dear Professor Poliakoff,
Many thanks to you and your team for the wonderful und always very interesting videos you post on UA-cam.
I have a question concerning the experiment with the light bulb in hydrofluoric acid.
Could the neat crack in the bulb not be caused by the temperature difference between the free part and the submerged and thereafter 'liquid cooled' part of the bulb? It would be interesting to see if the same thing happens even with a light bulb partially submerged in simple water.
Yours sincerely,
Luca Cettuzzi
I wondered if this was the stuff I had to handle in military, because of the whole _"One drop on your skin can kill you"_ since that's what we were told too. But I looked it up and it was *HCN* that we had tiny vials of, in case of some form of emergency... can't recall what, since it was over a decade ago. It's not fun to handle dangerous chemicals, so I fully understand Neil's concern here.
0:39 Yes, I've figured out why Neil is expendable. Incidentally its also the same reason you do not ever allow him to speak on camera. There's only one logical conclusion: Neil is Australian.
the light bulb cut right where the acid stopped, that is very cool guys, keep it up!
HF is extremely dangerous. One drop on your skin and your bones are doomed. You can never be too careful when dealing with it.
There was an accident in a Chinese high school. A chemistry teacher arranged an experiment session for students to play with HF (I know, WTF?) without proper protection (again, WTF?). Some students accidentally dropped some HF on their hands and the teacher was like "that's ok. Just wash with water you'll be fine" (Whaat?). It was not until 36 hours later that those students were sent to a hospital. The best time for treatment had already been past by then.
eeeeh. I don't know about one drop and you're *doomed*. But certainly requires a trip to the hospital and immediate action, not to mention necrosis and extreme pain. But one drop won't kill or permanently injure you. The margin for error is pretty slim though, especially if you don't get calcium glutamate on you right away.
xtamared Of course I did't mean it can doom all of your bones or doom you as a whole person. It depends on the amount of HF you are exposed to. But at least the tissues and bones in the immediate area of exposure will be ruined. F- will bond with all Ca2+ in your bones and form insoluble calcium fluoride (hence ruining your bones). That's why the treatment of HF poisoning always involving calcium gluconate.
It doesn't matter what concentration the HF solution is. And less informed person would assume it is safe to play with low concentration HF. That's why it's so dangerous.
xtamared from what I was informed by my Chemistry coordinator is that it's a sharp initial pain then pretty much no pain because the HF kills the nerve endings quickly. The HF then begins degradation of the nervous system caused by the Calcium ion pumps that are on the axon terminals, interfering with pre and post synaptic transmission.
Cam M sorry, clarity. HF binds to the Ca2+ ions that travel through calcium ion pumps.
Though I could be wrong about this...
HF, the stuff of nightmares....
The production values on these videos are first rate. They are a delight to watch.
As a slo-mo guy, Brady is very aptly named.
"Even small exposure to skin might cause heart attack, I really want to experiment with it".
It’s the natriumoxalate that will give you a heart attack, that is used when your skin is exposed to HF
HF reacts with calcium very very strongly, that’s why your skin is starting to turn black if you don’t treat it immediately it will start to spread
We need a proper episode about Neil soon. He puts his fingers/lungs/face/self on the line every time we get to see a video of a cool reaction. What's more, he's the one stuck cleaning up after all of them, and I feel that the chemistry of neutralizing/cleaning up after an awesome reaction is just as interesting as the reaction itself. I can imagine many other Periodic Videos viewers feel the same way. Love the vids Brady, thanks for doing what you do and please take this comment into consideration! after all, Neil is kinda your stig :P
So, hypothetically speaking, if I were to dispose a body i should use HF.
hypothetically of course...
+Tom DuBois You'd probably be waiting a very long time for the body to lose recognizability.
+Tom DuBois if you're willing to watch it there's a doc on YT about some serial killer who had a bunch of bodies melting away in drums, pretty disturbing. there's also an episode of breaking bad that will give you more info on this subject lol.
Hipotetically, HF is hard to get and too dangerous to handle, i'll use a cincentrated aqueous solution of NaOH instead, because i'ts a lot cheaper and relatively less dangerous to handle and still can dissolve a body with no problem
+isSHEEPMANimmortal Dahmer?
I adore this channel. Makes me want to go back and take my biochem degree all over again.
Not a single idea on why the glass broke that way? No actual physicists here? I'll take a crack at it (not a physicist). The HF dissolved a lot of the glass away on the bottom, thinning it out. The heat from the filament combined with the heat of the reaction caused it to expand - whereas the glass on the top, still thick, could absorb more heat energy and didn't expand as much. The glass broke at the line of thinning, and stayed in tact where it was thicker.
Differential cooling... you have this intense heat generating bulb sat in a liquid, gets thin enough to where the smallest pulsation causes it to go pop, and due to how glass fractures thats why its not a perfect ring
I had taken part into an experiement where we dissolved beakerglass (broken pieces) in heated oleum (conc. sulfuric acid). The glass were "dissolved" only from the rough broken edges and the "flat surfaces" stayed mostly intact.
You should do some experiments with fluoroantimonic acid.
It too rare and too hard to contain. No one has gotten enough to do anything close to this.
Or they could make azidoazide azide. That's fun
It's so corrosive that even filming it is difficult. The fumes alone would destroy the camera and anyone close to it.
My physics teacher once got hydrofluoric acid on his finger...
The acid was immediately absorbed into his finger. Within days, the entire end of his finger had turned black, and a doctor suggested injecting a basic solution throughout his finger to neutralize it. He hates needles, so knowing this was the only fix, he just waited it out. Eventually all of the acid went to his bone and was neutralized. He's about 60 years old and still has all of his fingers, so I guess it worked.
I'm curious on how HF in contact with skin will cause a heart attack? anyone?
It reacts with calcium in the blood. Calcium ions are used by the body to generate action potentials (electrical pulses) hence nerve function in vitally important organs such as the heart may become disabled.
The HF passes through the skin and the fluoride (F-) anions react with calcium (Ca2+ cations and precipitate out as the insoluble calcium fluoride (CaF2). This drop in calcium levels wreaks havoc on the functioning of your heart and nervous system. (nerves send impulses by pumping ions in and out of the cells)
That's some pretty interesting stuff. Thanks guys! :)
the fluorine in HF dissociates and binds with free calcium and magnesium ions in the blood stream. in high concentration mixtures (50% and above) the lethal dose is really quite low (7ml of anhydrous HF is enough to bind up all the calcium ions in the average adult male), but even low concentrations can have an effect, if 1% of our body surface area is exposed (this causes a pocket of this hypocalcemic and magnesmic state to follow along the blood stream and cause a similar result to a more significant exposure
) (1% of your BSA is roughly equivalent to the palm of your hand)
PeopleHateMyOpinions who is also a terrible Grammar Nazi sounds like something Walter White would use
I live these videos. There's always a wealth of knowledge, and you just cannot find this kind of instructions and entertainment anywhere else
Thanks
Should use concentrated HF next time
In a previous career a long time ago, I worked in a lab while in college as a student chemist. My job was to prep metal alloys for analysis by the lead chemists. Some of the metal alloys are used in jet engines, the shuttle program, and nuclear industry and contain quite array of elements to produce the desired properties. Some of these alloys were high in silicon, and I had to use a mixture of HCL, HNO3, and HF in order to dissolve the alloy to perform analysis on an AA spectrograph. We used Teflon beakers because of the HF. I was always careful of HF because its a weak acid and you can't wash it off very easily if you get it on your skin, but the acid that all the chemists feared the most, and the one I treated very carefully was perchloric acid. It can go BOOM!
"went well.. didn't explode"
Dear prof, those are mutually exclusive! If it went well, something has to explode!
But only if you preceded the experiment with the magic words, "Hold my beer"... :)
Thedutchjelle You also have to be wearing the safety tie (see colin furze)
The most charismatic scientist I'll ever admire
Call themselves chemists yet dont know that borosilicate glass (lightbulbs, beakers, test tubes) is resistant to HF. The only thing I am supprized about is that it got through as fast as it did.
No glass is containing silicate of any type is resistant to HF but some react very slowly and some react fast.
Nice video! I work at a HF alkylation unit. No room for errors. Every pipe in the acid part is made from Monel 400.
Wow, that just made breaking bad kinda boring.
in the show they don't mix it with water.
I can tell you now, I just breathed in hydrogen fluoride (by accident(byproduct of experiment)) and it hurts the lungs and bronchus
Did you die?
Deosn't matter, HF isn't strong enough to do what they showed in the show, no matter how concentrated.
You can't not mix it with water, pure HF is a gas. What we call hydrofluoric acid is a water solution of it.
Man that clean cut of the bulb is really cool
Why did the beaker have to be cloudy instead of clear?
+David Crawford The plastic used to contain it is produced in a different manner than other materials, even though they would have the same polymer formula. The thicker the folding, the more opaque and less pliable any given plastic will be.
Neurotransmission So you don't need to actually have a clouded one it is just a more durable plastic?
David Crawford The plastic is opaque because it is durable. If it was more transparent, there would be too many imperfections in the container; it wouldn't, well contain the hydrofluoric acid.
David Crawford Watch some educational videos about the production of plastics, and you'll understand why materials like the container used for HF here, and plastic wrap can be composed of the same polymer, but have different properties due to how the plastic is manufactured.
Neurotransmission I will, thanks for the information.
why is your voice so calming
This is the stuff Walter White used to get rid of bodies wasn't it?
Say my name
It's the stuff used in season 1 of Breaking Bad to dispose of a body, yes. Not sure if you mean the character or the real person.
jinno11 Heisenberg.
No, it's the stuff Pinkman used.
I have no clue why Walter's school had that in their supply cupboard
You had a temperature differential between the exposed glass and the submerged glass. This sets up a stress in ordinary (soda-lime-silicate) glass and it separates at the interface. Try it with another thermally conductive fluid to make the bulb last longer.
so how does it trigger heart attack instead of just burning you?
maybe it goes in your circulatory system, wich...you know...leads to the heart
Because it leaches calcium from your bones and system. Calcium is used as part of the signalling systems in your body. HF is pretty much the devil's piss.
Yeah, I had to look that up, too. Apparently, it dissolves through your skin until it gets to your bloodstream, at which point it interferes with your body's ability to utilize calcium. Calcium, by the way, is extremely important to generating nerve signals, so without it, your nerves stop working--including the ones that keep your heart beating. Hence, heart attack.
Hydrofluoric acid is fun! :D
IceMetalPunk Yeah when I worked in a univ. Maintenance dept, handling the fume cupboard fans during repairs involved full body disposable coveralls, face shield, respirator, boots, gloves, etc, and calcium gluconate gel was always available just in case
I use to work on Watkins Johnson atmospheric glass deposition system for semi conductor manufacture. About every six months the glass would build up in the nitrogen injection muffle. We would install teflon covers and inject 50% HF into the N2 muffles and wait 2 hours to clean out the build up of glass. We always put on face shield, acid aprons, acid glove and had calcium glucomate nearby. It wasn't to scary when you take care and wear the proper PPE. I did hate that machine though.
HF is probably the most feared chemical compound there is , how about dimethyl cadmium I ask
:D
Dimethylcadmium and Dimethylmercury are *both* nasty!
So is dimethyl zinc
+Nikola Genchev azidoazide azide
nitrogen trifluoride
Someone has been watching Hank Green :D
Nah, Dioxygen Diflouride
Best soundtrack choice possible!
How many chemists do you need to change a lightbulb?
None, they'll just drop all the light bulbs in acid.
I was so naive that in 1974, I bought a gallon of HF so that I could etch stuff in glass. In my apt I poured some HF into a plastic dish tub and dipped a piece of window glass that I had coated in wax and drew a design on. I let it sit for a while - I do not remember anything about the project or the results. I do remember that the kitchen window in that apt was not as clear as it used to be. I knew enough to wear gloves, not to pour the stuff down the drain (I think that I took it out into the alley and dumped it there), and have no idea what happened to the rest of the acid. I remember that a couple years later some friends and I set up a bronze kiln/foundry in a shed in back of the 3D household on Aloha street. That is the last place I remember seeing it - I think that place was torn down in 1979. But a little knowledge is a dangerous thing (later I learned about Velvet Etching Cream - much safer).
I had no idea that there was a chemical out there that could dissolve glass.
Hey look, its my fave acid!
NaOH can dissolve glassO_o
Guess one of us wasn't watching breaking bad :D
***** I don't have TV.
Stephen Fonnesbeck you have internet
I once worked in a quality control lab in a fibreglass insulation factory where we used HF to clean platinum beakers used for trial melts. After soaking overnight in conc. HF the glass looked like sugar and could be washed from the crucible.
One test we did was chemical durability of glass. It was ground to a very fine powder then heated in water with reflux. This dissolved some of the soda lime components of the glass which could be measured by titration with a phenolphthalein indicator. So in fact glass was being partly dissolved by plain water.
It IS the universal solvent.
How does it cause a heart attack?
The fluorine ions (F-) are quite toxic, but I do not know why exactly. I only know that they can dissolve your bones, forming fluorite crystals (CaF2)
+derkateramabend Thanks
+DavidTheTech It reacts with calcium ions in your body, forming CaF2, which is insoluble and precipitates out of your blood. Calcium ions are essential to the contraction of muscles, including cardiac muscle.
+Yindog1 wow
Those fluorite crystals precipitate and act as cholesterol, blocking the arteries, possibly leading to pectoral anginas, aneurysms, strokes or heart attacks.
In terms of fast acting corrosive properties, it's actually considerably weaker than hydrochloric acid and sulphuric acid, and actually less quickly damaging than bases like caustic soda.
The trouble is that it's really difficult to wash off because fluoride ions can seep through the skin, doing damage in the following hours after exposure. They can also spread around the body and infect all sorts of sensitive organs and tissues, which is what makes it so dangerous.
What I'm saying is that putting your hand in caustic soda solution would more quickly damage it than in hydrofluoric acid - concentration/temperature being equal. The difference is that hydrofluoric acid would continue to damage under the skin (and possibly spread elsewhere) long after the hand has been removed.
Put more stuff in HF (i sound like a five year old, but i'm actually a nano-chemistry scientist). I'm really interested in its effect on different material. Or better so put stuff in PIRANHA (strongest acid there is, i won't disclose the ingredients because it is more dangerous that HF. Ppl who can use this information non-idioticaly already knows them.)
there are acids way stronger than piranha
Wait, isn't aqua regia the strongest? Or is it only special because it can dissolve gold and platinum?
I mean strongest acid that normal people can get (or in this case make). Yeah some organic acids are extremely difficult to even contain.
Aqua regia is very strong, but piranha is stronger.
Sulfiuric acid... hydrogen peroxide.... you get piranha. eager people are now satisfied
Algimantas Janarauskas How do you tell which acid is stronger/strongest?
Isn't it rather the temperature differece between the submerged part of the bulb and the part that isn't cooled by the liquid that causes the bulb to break exactly at the point where it is touching the surface? I'm not sure about what kind of glass is used for simple light bulbs like this one, but I can only assume that, since these bulbs are made from some sort of glass that can handle temperature changes quite well, since this kind of bulb heats up quite a bit when the light is turned on. For the time the bulb was submerged, the HF didn't seem to have much effect on the glass, although it was apparently clouded a bit and therefore thinned, to some degree in the area where it was submerged. I've seen some cases where a slow change in temperature in glass can cause very clean breaking points, even if no acid whatsoever is involved. Would be interesting to check the temperatures of the liquid and the part of the bulb that is in air, or repeat the experiment just using water or some other heat absorbing liquid, I predict that the result would be about the same.
Lol i remember when I went threw puberty 4:20
+Nick C THROUGH puberty. Ugh.
Awesome stuff. This is why I loved Chemistry at school.
why don't use some fluoroantimonic acid ?
In case anyone does not understand why the water level cut happened I am pretty sure i know the reason.
the waterline was the hottest part of the bulb in contact with the HF solution.
1) The water was conducting heat away from the rest of the bulb more rapidly because the molecules had more directions to go to dissipate the heat.
2) The nitrogen in the bulb (yes its not a pure vacuum like most people think) carried heat convectively upwards.
3) the water on the outside of the bulb was also convecting upwards.
The Higher temp sped up the reaction at the interface.
اللي جاي من قضيه خاشقجي يضغط لايك
When I was young, I used to use a product for removing rust stains from fabric. It intended use was apparently to remove rust and other oxide stains from sails should a washer or bolt fall into the sail locker. It was removed from the market and I never understood why. All I knew about it at the time it had 10% HF on the bottle. When attempting to have the compound replicated I was told the 10% HF on your skin would leach the Calcium from your bones. I use a totally different method today.
this makes perfect sense, heat and acid create fractal points in hard surfaces. it's how hannibal crossed the alps. with heating the rock and adding vinegar it created micro fissions all through the rocky terrain, he paved a path through the mountains cleverly.
I've gotten that on me. Unbelievable how fast it burns you. I used to joke that when it lands on your forearm, you just have to look at the bottom of your arm and it'll fall right out after a second. Then you can whistle through it!
Wow. That was worth the wait. What an explosion! seriously though...love periodic videos.
Many years ago I use to use Hydrofluoric Acid to etch on glass. Made wonderful art with it. You can purchase Hydrofluoric Acid in very diluted form for glass etching :)
@Periodic Videos The edge near the surface becomes hotter than the glass that's deeper in the liquid more heat is faster reaction hence the neat cut.
Once found a lead bottle in an old house we were refurbishing. It had two concentric discoid protuberances at the neck. The top was unusual in that instead of a cork or lead stopper it had a small gilded perfume vial suspended by three or four tiny nails and embedded in the stopper. I could tell a liquid was inside. I was hesitant to try and open it. I left it in the back of an old Toyota pick up parked in front of my parents orchard while in college. I was unaware it had been ticketed for being immobile for too long and it was finally towed. I only paid $150 for it originally and didnt bother seeking it back. It was only later while perusing an old chemistry book I recognised the container for HF. I imagine the vial improvised into the stopper had a note inside warning of the danger of its contents. Then again, for all I know, the vial had nitroglycerin in it . . . iows, an improvised explosive device. I loath to think someone attempting to open it. More likely the kit and caboodle went into a compactor and recycled. Hope so.
I used to work with HF on a regular basis at an old job I had. Niel was wearing a lot less PPE than I wore while working with that vile stuff. At come concentrations it can eat the bone out from under your skin, so they say, and you have to get calcium gluconate shots directly into the burns to stop it from doing more damage.
My Chemistry Professor in College had a story about HF. According to him... Diluted HF is used to clean aluminum and specifically the aluminum sides of trucks. This solution was given you a guy and he was told to clean the trucks with it. So he proceeded to dip a sponge in it and wipe away at the truck. Without any sort of protective gloves or other gear. Supposedly the HF dissolved his bones in his arms and they had to be amputated.
I always wondered if there was any truth to this story or if it was just a scary story to make us be cautious when handling the stuff in lab.
They did an experiment with HF using a chicken leg. It wasn't nearly as corrosive as believed so no, your story is not true.
However he could have had to be amputated due to extreme nerve damage but he would have noticed nerve damage far before it spread to his arm.
+MoOrion It probably is true. I was trained to use HF. You may be exposed and not notice the exposure for up to 8 hours later. HF is anhydrous. If you get it on your skin, it absorbs and will dissolve your bone underneath. In the refinery, I mostly worked around Sulfuric Acid but they used to cross train on alkylation units in the Amoco, BP Amoco and now Marathon refinery in Texas City, Texas. About the time that the group of guys I hired in with joined the alkylation units they stopped cross training for safety concerns. They still sent a small Playmate cooler home with us on the Sulfuric Alkylation Unit with a cream and eye wash (calcium gluconate if I recall correctly) so if we started having symptoms of exposure, hours later, we could start applying the cream and/or eye wash on the way to the hospital. The staff at Mainland Hospital in Texas City was also trained on the hazards of HF. Marathon's smaller refinery (the only one they had in Texas City at the time) dropped a vessel onto a 6" HF vapor line and over 3,000 people in Texas City went to the ER. I would not do what this mad scientist did without being in a fully encapsulated suit with supplied fresh air.
The professor's endless flailing with his hands is driving me nuts hehe. I still listen to all the interesting stuff he says but I have to scroll down when he's in frame. =P
We use HF to clean our Quartz deposition tubes at work (HCL is used for both Quartz and Silicon Carbide diffusion tubes) as it literally strips a layer off of the inside of the tube. We also use it to strip the oxide off of the silicon wafers while leaving the doped silicon untouched. Great stuff, very dangerous. We use Calcium Gluconate gel as the antidote.
I'd really love to know what happened when HF rushed inside and dissolved the electrodes. Because of the alternating currents: is it possible that both electrodes get dissolved when they are either positive or negative as of the two poles of HF? What are the electrodes made of? Will the dissolving process be quicker in same or alternating current? Lots and Lots of questions :)
depending on your nationality they tend to be made from Tungsten or Wolfram (same element, 2 different names: element 'W'). I suspect that easily formed WFx compounds are pretty stable so it wouldn't do much I'm afraid.
In Halogen bulbs yes (I think, I thought it was Chlorine/chloride but I don't see why bromides or iodides wouldn't work as well...I did this kind of chemistry a very long time ago), but this one (in the video) is a normal, old school, incandescent bulb. Tungsten filament in a vacuum (or as close as is necessary to stop the filament burning out in less than a second) so the only halide species around is the fluoride from the HF, hence my thought that it's only be able to make WFx compounds. The WFx mightn't even be soluble (many metal fluorides aren't) so they'd passivate the filament surface.
yep, I forget quite frequently that most people don't think the same way as me :)
You professor are a nutter & I mean that in the most affectionate and complementry manner. Love your videos.
I used to work with a mixture of Hydrofluoric Acid and Ammonia Chloride “to etch radio crystals” and someone got this mixture on there fingers one day. It was only there for a brief moment but, he said that it felt like his fingers where on fire for over a month.
Love the experiments on this channel
This is the beat channel on youtube
The break along the surface is a result of chemical reactions with the atmosphere. Here is another example of this: Furnaces that are used to melt glass in large quantities are usually emptied and turned off after about 6-7years (about half their lifetime) so maintenance can be done on the inside. If you look at the surfaces on the inside you can then see very clearly that the surface decday of the ceramic bricks is much stronger in the area where the surface of the molten glass comes in contact with the atmosphere. You can see that the corrosion goes very deep into the bricks whereas only the surface is effected above and below that point.
0:11 Think i fear Dimethyl Cadmium a touch more tbf.
Watching these videos I don't even notice 5 minutes have passed.... I was going to play stellaris at 10pm and its now 12:32am and the launcher for the game is still sitting there lol
What the experiment showed is that the corrosion of the glass is strongest right at the surface of the acid. Do the gasses in the air act like catalysts or does it have something to do with surface tension?
Wouldn't the electrolysis at the end make fluorine gas?
I still like this video all these years later
I'm no chemist, but my guess would be the water with the HF and then the glass in it would either be conductive or have a low enough breakdown voltage for the Ac to happily conduct through it. If you had an Ohmmeter with really cheap probes (hobbyist multimeter from a cheap catalog or store) you could probably test the solution and see how resistive it is, if you can find someone brave enough to stick the probes into it.
Also, having seen a video on HF, it makes me wonder; are you guys covering some of the things from the Things I'll never work with? I seem to recall HF getting a lengthy writeup there.
+1 for the awesome video and neat reaction!
Finally a HF reaction video on youtube :D
Nobody probably cares, but a minor quibble with the assertion that the filament dissolved once exposed to HF: The filament is very fragile and doesn't survive well when the vacuum of the bulb is lost. In air, it oxidizes into crust and breaks very rapidly. In an aqueous solution, I think thermal shock would probably break it if the air didn't get it fast enough. In either case dissolution isn't the right way to describe the failure mode. Fun video.
the bulb broke just like i hoped it would ... clean satisfying cut
I think you are putting everyone at risk by not using fully encapsulated suits with supplied air. I used to work around HF and I am very aware of the dangers.
What's the explanation for the lightbulb corroding only on the surface of the acid? I thought that the corrosion would have been more even.
mahin alam The entire submerged part of the bulb corroded, if you look at the remains you will see it being thinner than the rest.
The reason for it breaking in a circle however, is (i think) because of the stress caused at the point where it transitions from thick (un-corroded) to thin (corroded), combined with heat from the bulb itself and the reaction.
Patrick Hansen
I think it was the hottest at this place and it sped up the reaction. Below the surface HF took away the heat and above there was no HF.
Patrick Hansen I would suspect it had more to do with the way glass shatters rather than heat differential.
Pretty sure the clean break was nothing chemistry related, just thermal shock due to difference in temp between hot glass above the liquid level and cool glass cooled by the liquid (possibly aided by the HF thinning the glass). Maybe do a control run with plain water? I guess the sparking at the end was a combination of a very small electric arc with hydrogen burning.