Flux Tubes and Length Contraction Due to Rotational Angular Frequency Flux tubes with a starting circumference ℎ and starting radius ℏ experience length contraction as they move with angular frequency multiplied by the distance from the rotational axis. This contraction is proportional to the growth of mass and the curvature of the vortex field. As Planck flux speed takes a longer path before completing a full circle, Planck time dilates, leading to a conversion of Planck force into a different form of work, resulting in Planck force differential gravity. Planck Length Contraction and Gravity Field : The relative Planck length is given by: Relative Planck length = Planck flux speed / (constant flux speed + movement velocity of the Planck vortex) Planck Length Gradient Beyond the angular frequency radius, Planck length contraction occurs, reversing the gravity field within that radius. The central axis likely has a larger flux tube, with weaker, length-contracted flux tube filaments radiating from its poles. These filaments break and reform constantly due to higher positional movement velocity, while the central flux tube remains relatively intact. Planck Flux Speed Contraction from Feedback Loops of Flux Speed Constant (Appearance of Inflation) Planck flux is constantly forming feedback loops of flux speed constant, slowing Planck flux down. The Planck length gradient moves with the planet, solar system, star clusters, and galaxy, dragging the Planck field and causing Planck force differential (gravity). This explains gravity, the weakening of Planck force, and the equivalence of special relativistic length contraction and general relativity. Dark Energy, Dark Matter, and Large Voids Large voids with lesser special relativistic positional movements of Planck vortices have shorter Planck time and longer relativistic Planck length. This framework explains dark energy, dark matter, gravity, fundamental mass formation, and the physical foundations of quantum mechanics (this is not meter space [which ignores Planck length contraction], this is non-normalized GR backdrop space for accurate energy conservation). Photon as a Spherical Wave The photon energy is a spherical wave (or curved egg-shaped wave when near a black hole), which passes through Planck vortices as a rotational change in angular momentum axis. Banding of the Wave The banding of the wave is determined by the local convergence of phase, amplitude, polarization, and direction of cascade, which affects the probability of detecting photon momentum. Converging Photon Energy The momentum of converging photon energy is given by the formula: Converging photon energy = Planck angular momentum vortex spin axis reorientation frequency × same reorientation phase × same reorientation polarization × number of neighbors activated × same travel direction Angular Drive Factors When the angular drive factors are aligned and cascading in the same direction through the Planck field, they create a concerted push rather than counteracting each other. This is not the Planck angular momentum itself, but rather the change in its spin axis, which cascades to other Planck units within the Planck field.
Flux Tubes and Length Contraction do to rotational angular frequency: Flux tubes with starting local relative circumference ℎ and starting local relative radius ℏ experience length contraction as they move with angular frequency * distance from angular rotational axis. This contraction is proportional to the growth of mass and the curvature of the vortex field. As Planck flux speed takes a longer path before completing a full circle, Planck time dilates, leading to a conversion of Planck force into a different form of work, resulting in Planck force differential gravity. Planck Length Contraction and Gravity Field: Relative Planck length = Planck flux speed / (constant flux speed + positional movement velocity of the Planck vortex in non-normalized GR backdrop space). Planck Length Gradient: Beyond the angular frequency radius, Planck length contraction occurs, reversing the gravity field within that radius. The central axis likely has a larger flux tube, with weaker, length-contracted flux tube filaments radiating from its poles. These filaments break and reform constantly due to higher positional movement velocity, while the central flux tube remains relatively intact. Planck Flux speed contraction from Feedback Loops of flux speed constant (the appearance of inflation): Planck flux is constantly forming feedback loops of flux speed constant, slowing Planck flux down. The Planck length gradient moves with the planet, solar system, star clusters, and galaxy, dragging the Planck field and causing Planck force differential (gravity). This explains gravity, the weakening of Planck force, and the equivalence of special relativistic length contraction and general relativity (within non-normalized GR backdrop volume length = flux speed constant length). Dark Energy, Dark Matter, and Large voids with lesser special relativistic positional movements of Planck vortices have shorter Planck time and longer relativistic Planck length. This framework explains dark energy, dark matter, gravity, fundamental mass formation, and the physical foundations of quantum mechanics. Photon as a Spherical Wave: The photon is described as a spherical wave (or egg-shaped wave near a black hole), which passes through Planck vortices as a spin reorientation. Banding of the Wave: The banding of the wave is determined by the local convergence of phase, amplitude, and polarization, and direction of cascade, which affects the probability of detecting photon momentum. Converging Photon Energy: The momentum of converging photon energy is given by the formula: Converging photon energy = Planck angular momentum vortex spin axis reorientation frequency × same reorientation phase × same reorientation polarization × number of neighbors activated × same travel direction (with spherical correction). Angular Drive Factors: When the angular drive factors are aligned and cascading in the same direction through the Planck field, they create a concerted push rather than counteracting each other. This is not the Planck angular momentum itself, but rather the change in its spin axis, which cascades to other Planck units within the Planck field. As you can see, it's very simple, the wave isn't fundamental, and general relativity is special relativity acting on Planck vortices (within non-normalized GR backdrop space). Non-normalized GR backdrop space conserves the amount of flux speed constant and Planck flux speed slows down and forms more units to move through as flux speed constant forms more loops (decreasing the Planck force everywhere, shrinking mass observers, and bifurcating Planck lengths to form more Planck units), meaning we no longer need inflation. The reason why the photon momentum grows when travelling down a Planck force differential gradient (gravity field), is because a contracted Planck length has less Planck mass, the photon energy will have more relative effect. Relative Planck length = Planck flux speed / (constant flux speed + positional movement velocity of the Planck vortex in non-normalized GR backdrop space). Where non-normalized GR backdrop volume length is flux speed constant, everything in the cosmos forms within that measure of real volume as Planck flux is constantly forming feedback loops of flux speed constant, slowing Planck flux down everywhere, while relativistic Planck length differentials derives from the positional movements of these vortices within GR backdrop space. The thing that was missed is that, the Planck length gradient moves with the planet, solar system, star clusters, and galaxy, dragging the Planck field and causing Planck force differential (gravity), by positional movement being inversely proportional to relativistic Planck length. This explains gravity, the weakening of Planck force, and the equivalence of special relativistic length contraction and general relativity. Dark Energy, Dark Matter, and Large voids with lesser special relativistic positional movements of Planck vortices have shorter Planck time and longer relativistic Planck length. This means you are pushed towards other masses by the Planck force differential, rather than attracted, there is no such thing as attraction when you account for everything, it is the bisector reflection of inverse directional momentum on local intersect. Fundamental Momentum = square root [x_ConstantFluxtotal^2, y_ConstantFluxtotal^2, z_ConstantFluxtotal^2] to add all the vector direction differentials of flux speed constant in the volume of non-normalized GR backdrop space you are measuring, anywhere.
@@TheoriesofEverything What do you think of the work of the German physicist Burkhard Heim? Could you make a contribution to this? His (error-corrected) discrete geometrization produced results that have not been achieved again to this day.
Constant flux speed = non-normalized GR backdrop volume length. Planck flux speed = constant flux speed divided by loop density. Relativistic Planck length = Planck flux speed divided by (flux speed constant + vortex axis positional movement velocity). Flux Tubes and Length Contraction do to rotational angular frequency: Flux tubes with starting circumference ℎ and starting radius ℏ experience length contraction as they move with angular frequency * distance from rotational axis. This contraction is proportional to the growth of mass and the curvature of the vortex field. As Planck flux speed takes a longer path before completing a full circle, Planck time dilates, leading to a conversion of Planck force into a different form of work, resulting in Planck force differential gravity. Planck Length Gradient: Beyond the angular frequency radius, Planck length contraction occurs, while reversing the gravity field within that radius. The central axis likely has a larger flux tube, with weaker, length-contracted flux tube filaments radiating from its poles. These filaments break and reform constantly due to higher positional movement velocity, while the central flux tube remains relatively intact. Planck Flux speed contraction from Feedback Loops of flux speed constant (the appearance of inflation): Planck flux is constantly forming feedback loops of flux speed constant, slowing Planck flux down universally, shortening Planck lengths while forming more (when Planck flux speed slows down, longer lengths break down, do to less relative push, allowing them to be perturbed and bifurcate till length and speed reach equilibrium [enough feedback loops of constant flux speed to curve Planck flux, but not so much to cause destabilizing wobbles, therefore as Planck flux decreases, the planck length follows, and forms more Planck vortices to move through]). The Planck length gradient moves with the planet, solar system, star clusters, and galaxy, dragging the Planck field and causing the Planck force differential (gravity), because Relativistic Planck length = (Planck flux speed) divided by (flux speed constant + vortex axis positional movement velocity). This explains gravity, the weakening of Planck force as the vortices move causing distribution of Planck force, and the equivalence of special relativistic length contraction and general relativity within the non-normalized GR backdrop volume as the vortices are moving within that volume. Dark matter, dark energy is caused by lesser special relativistic positional movements of Planck vortices, they have shorter Planck time and longer relativistic Planck length. This unites quantum mechanics and general relativity, and provides firm and accurate foundation for energy conservation. The photon energy is described as a spherical wave (or curved egg-shaped wave near a black hole), which passes through Planck vortices as a spin reorientation. The banding of the wave is determined by the local convergence of Planck reorientation frequency, phase, amplitude, polarization, and direction of cascade, which affects the probability of detecting photon momentum, even though the energy is there. The photon energy is a spherical wave (or curved egg-shaped wave evolution near a black hole), which passes through Planck vortices as a angular axis spin reorientation. Banding of the Wave: The banding of the wave is determined by the local convergence of reorientation frequency, phase [reorientation rotated direction], amplitude [number of reoriented neighbors], and polarization [reorientation rotation direction], and direction of the cascade, which affects the probability of detecting photon momentum. Converging Photon Energy: The momentum = converging photon energy is given by the formula: Converging photon energy = Planck angular momentum vortex spin axis reorientation frequency × same reorientation phase × same reorientation polarization × number of neighbors activated × same travel direction. When these angular and linear drive factors are aligned and cascading together in the same direction through the Planck field, they create a concerted push rather than counteracting each other. This is not the Planck angular momentum itself, but rather the change in its spin axis, which is communicated by the Planck flux angular momentum, which cascades to other Planck units within the Planck field. As you can see, it's very simple, the wave isn't fundamental, and general relativity is special relativity acting on Planck vortices within GR backdrop space. Masses are pushed towards other masses by the Planck force differential.
Amazing masterclass on geometric quantization!! Please keep sharing this type of content with the world since, as you said, there aren't many lectures free on the web.
I would like to see discussion of her line of reasoning because it leans very heavily on mathematics and reminds me of statements made by David Hestenes regarding Pauli Algebra and Dirac's derivation of his equation. To me, she sounds weak as a physicist but very strong as a mathematician so I feel like I'm watching Weyl vs. Einstein Round 2. Einstein dissed Weyl as an authority on Physics but Weyl's ideas eventually became very useful and while Einstein's physical intuition was very strong he actually got the math wrong about a second clock effect according to Hobson and Lazenby.
Question about plus around 52:38 or so. The log on the matrix to have the right form involves addition for so(3). A Lie algebra is like the logarithm of a Lie Group, approximately. This goes in reverse, a Lie Group is like the exponential of a Lie Algebra (for those in the know, the generators of a Lie Algebra come from how the Lie Group evolves in the tangent space near the identity of the Lie Group). Multiplication in Lie Groups ~ Commutation in Lie Algebras.
Yes, you can think that the multiplication in lie groups when derives gives the brackets (which you call commutator thinking of physics but do not need to commute). This is a good point.
“Wax on. Wax off!” Had to stop again and transmit this thought/question… When she was speaking of polarization and manifolds I had a vision of a Pearl. You have the “General” in the sphere and “quantum” on the surface…it is the “chaotic” reflection/refraction called CHATOYANCE. Something we cannot accurately calculate, but know it is BEAUTIFUL! Is this a relevant visualization Eva?
Hi, I like this metaphorical approach that you make. In a way you can think of these polarizations as a "filter" of solutions so it acts like a the Pearl situation that you describe. Thanks for bringing this image up. I like it!
@ thank you, just trying to help some of us that can’t do all the “math”, but are bridges between natural physics and creating useful products. Thank you again for the presentation Prof Miranda, looking forward to the next one. 😊✌🏼
There is another comment where the guy takes issue of her use of the term magical, I had to reply with a similar anecdote, trying to make the point that there is a difference between natural being super and being supernatural, that her use of the term magical was referring to her awe of the beauty of fundamental nature.
@ no doubt…it makes me sad when people have lost the idea of “magic” in their lives…the deterministic materialist is caught in a BINARY TRAP of their own making. They are easily triggered; she wasn’t referring to Merlin and a wand! 😂 Nature is MAGICAL, Life is MAGICAL, our Existence is MAGICAL… Hopefully they will open up and come on this amazing journey that is beginning NOW! Have a wonderful evening Pete!✌🏼
Some help on understanding the term's "quantum's definition" in this science help - I have been researching for its simplified approach to its use for years - like the atomic definition to a circumstance. When reaching a level to small to view, but it shows it has activities inside, this view area is grouped for recording the patterns found from a view's point of view - a squared of area easily recorded being present. And example to get an understanding building support: The atom is to small to actually view but its activities become apparent to a view point from a second layer step out. This is showing things like the electron is very fluent with flow properties. {Thus the area under is always changing, as its shapes and pattern's current support to the outer view layer.} The example - Taking the effects of the river/creek's water flow to the sediment area building, clearly will show the sediment sizes by weight will be layered properly, 1st rule of engineering skill building.
Maybe the view avoidance is as mentioned, a wave logic being searched for. Why? The individual parts of the atom has 2 different energies building it. The PROTON and than the ELECTRON. Watch one or the other or both at the same time logic being searched for!
So for the second layer with viewing support has this question to solve: At what point of both energies cooperation does the support for the 2 layer to rest on starts - for mass building?
For machine research from my comments, to remember to applied the point of reaching no bumps to worry about, is the friction logic to overcome, with a stable mas/weight to work with.
@evamiranda4275 I have a feeling a part 2 of this conversation on the way , well done Eva was nice presentation. Would be nice to have more highlights on Donaldson work, also explaining the hodge theory in relation to Floer and so on. Floer theory gone through a lots of effort without wide acknowledgement. I think people should learn about it more. Not even mention the relationship to string theory or how some works been crossed between these subjects. Floer theory is one of the most beautiful mathematical adventure when I was reading back it's development it's truly amazing
@@JAYMOAP yes, indeed part 2 is thought to go in the direction of explaining a geometric approach to Navier-Stokes equations and connection to computer science. I would be happy to talk about Floer theory and the connections to problems in Celestial mechanics, this would be probably for another discussion. Then, I could try to talk more general about Symplectic Geometry and contributions of Donaldson as you mention.
Although I'm not qualified, I watched this for the suspense, like an Edgar Poe mystery, and by the end I was so involved that I was like (and I apologize in advance for the joke) "Bitch, you better have my manifold!"
@43:00 it is not "magical", at least I don't think. Curt's question was deeper. In Newtonian mechanics there is no Poisson bracket, position and momentum are independent. Only once a Hamilton function is defined do you have the conjugate Poisson bracket relations. That requires a judicious choice of "canonical" coordinates, i.e., you have to know the symmetries (or equivalently conservation laws). The exact symmetries might not be known, in which case you can only chug away with Newton. The amazing thing is the symmetries for elementary physical systems are pretty simple and we do know them.
@@Achrononmaster you a watchmaker, historian or a time traveler? I like the name.. Let me tell you a quick anecdote, On a long trip, driving all night, heading Southeast in a snowstorm. Around sunrise on a very straight section of the highway I reached the point in the storm where the air was exactly at the freezing point, everything else was still below freezing. The snow has turned to a slushy rain I was freezing solid to everything it touched, the sunrise was perfectly aligned with the ice crystals search that the edges of every surface of all the tree branches became prismatic sparkles and rainbows , and despite gliding with no traction I knew and had absolutely no fear knowing I would keep going in a straight line and nobody else was on the road. It was magical. I'm almost certain that that's what she means by magical, that she is seeing the beauty and balance in the universe, just awed by fundamental nature. No way she was calling it magic. Natural superness versus supernatural.
Thanks a lot. I appreciate your comments. I loved that you compared my eyes to Elizabeth Taylor's (you made my day 😃). It is the UV filer in my glasses that generates the purple effect.
@53:00 isn't it better to just note the Lie algebra generators X live in a vector space _V_ that is equipped with a Lie bracket, so you from inception have operations •, +, ∧. The (Lie) symmetry group is obtained _from_ the exponential map exp(X) on the X. In other words, you _start_ with a vector space, not with a Lie manifold. The interesting thing occurs when the symmetry group involves non-connected components (from mirror inversions for example) which is additional topology resulting in different Lie groups with the same Lie algebra. This is where the Lie algebra fails to fully capture the global structure of the Lie group, which is super important, since you need a double cover to retrieve a connected Lie manifold. I think thar is physics content in thar.
2 ends of the same scale, quantum physics and the macro universe, in between the spin, torsion the function that unravels the fabric of space/time into a 5th reality from where no need of machines to knit layers of atoms according to standard physics to gravity and the electrons natural path. A geometry where torsion energy knits structures according to quantum geometry. Wolfram found the geometry, Mandelbrot found the spin, Bohr found the quantum, Einstein found the universe and our ancestors found pi and phi. Together we have quantum geometry. One thing missing is how to render this physics. Quantum 3d printing out of the energy of the vacuum. Quantum geometry?
To avoid the confusion presented by those trapped in the ivory tower 9x9. Under your nose. The whole damn time Digitally root the table and you have geometric quantization
@22:00 you do not know the "laws of physics" - so you cannot ask the question "are they computable?". You can only ask if your current specified model is computable (will always halt on any initial conditions, on in CT terms "will always be knowably either possible or impossible.").
By "geometric," I guess it is to be understood that we are talking about something that has a shape, and in which time itself is part of this shape. And this shape can be visualized by a brain that is powerful enough. Visualised all at once, instantly. It is just like the Block Universe. I wonder if this understanding of mine is correct. 🙄
@@Julio_Siqueira - physicist are low level thinkers, and they are limited; restricted by their laws of physics. Physics is a dead end! However we Meta-physicist, know that we are not restricted by dead end Laws, and our universe is endless, and in our universe are the dead ends of all of the great Physicist; as the Meta-physical universe continues on, boundless borders. SOMETHING IS MISSING?🤔
Yea id love to see a Nassim.Haramein interview with some actual push back on some of his ideas. I've only seen softball interviews, but I've been hearing him make humongous claims for 15 years now and all we got is a crystal that to me, personally, doesn't seem to do much. Just saying it'd be nice to see him interviewed by somebody that could give a lot deeper into his claims instead of just outright believing every word he says
Eva mentioned Casimirs. Historical comment: I met Hendrik Casimir once during a lustrum of the Huygens Dispuut - a student club of the Faculty of Science of University of Leiden (Netherlands) that counted many famous members in the past and frequent visitors to its meetings, among whom Ehrenfest, Einstein and DeSitter. Casimir was a student of Ehrenfest, and later he became Director of the Philips Physical Lab in Eindhoven. In later age he wrote brilliant columns for some Dutch newspaper. He died age 91 in 2000.
@@franknijhoff6009 - That the problem with physics, and physicist, they come to dead ends. The Universe is Abstract; Metaphysical, and does not end, nor rely on mathematics, because the Meta-Physicist are infinite, eternal IMAGINEERS, no mathematics required.🤯🤔👀🙏🏾
So much fun ... All the locations of all protons are held on the surface of the atom this is the quantum effect that creates the uniform size... that's why we can only interact with atoms of the same size ... there are atoms of larger and smaller sizes we can only interact with their gravity
@@seva-lapsha - one and zero is binary; digital state. We have discovered, and moved into the quantum frontier, where there are more than ON and Off, and rather than particles, it’s waves, fields, electric/magnetic fields of endless possibilities. Imagination rules in the Quantum Universe, and Imagination does not require mathematics.
Einstein did not know how to derive the value of 'h' (Planck's constant) within the context of Classical Electrodynamics (Maxwell theory). If we can derive the dimensionless fine-structure constant from for instance mathematical 'Chaos theory' constants (and other math constants) then it is possible to derive the value of 'h' from Classical Electrodynamics. The Planck constant was determined by Planck from the black-body radiation energy-spectrum (as a function of the black-body temperature), however, this constant seems totally unrelated to the constants from CED theory. Dr. Miranda, do you agree that a classical derivation of the value of 'h' should be part of the theory that you are working on?
Been looking forward to this one for a while! Haven't finished watching yet but if there's no mention of the orbit method or the theory of induced representations I'm going to be salty as hell >__< EDIT: orbit method briefly alluded to at 54:30 but no explicit mention of orbit method of theory of induced reps... Sigh.... Was a good conversation but was hoping the deep connections to the theory of linear representatioins would be mentioned. For anyone curious, geometric quantization can be thought of as a method of producing unitary representations of symmetry from coadjoint orbits of Lie groups. The algorithm is roughly as follows: Step i) Start with a dual Lie algebra element f of a Lie group G Step ii) Find the stabalizer subgroup of f, denoted G_f, which is the subgroup such that the coadjoint action leaves f invariant. The coadjoint orbit of f is just the space of left cosets G/G_f . Step iii) Compute the symplectic form by taking the Maurer-Cartan form of G and composing it with f to get a real value 1-form on G, take the exterior derivative of that 1-form to get a 2-form. This 2-form is degenerate but it's actually the pull-back of non-degenerate 2-form on G/G_f, the latter is the symplectic form. Step iv) Check that your coadjoint orbit is integral (see top of slide at 1:31:13). This is equivalent to the condition that the Lie algebra rep of G_f defined by f integrates to a Lie group rep \chi_f: G_f -> C. Step v) Conditional on the success of the previous step, take the rep \chi_f and induce from it a representation of the full group G (this uses the symplectic form computed in step iii). The vectors in this induced rep are the sections of the pre-quantum line bundle. Step v) The resulting representation is reducible, so to make it irreducible we have to introduce a polarization. This consists of a maximal Lie subalgebra h containing the Lie algebra of G_f such that f([X,Y]) = 0 for all X and Y in h. This condition (at least in the case of real polarizations) ensures f extends to a Lie alg rep of h, and integrality ensures that \chi_f extends to a rep of the corresponding Lie group H. The space of polarized sections are then the vectors of the induced rep of \chi_f viewed as a representation of H. Step vi) Was only briefly mentioned in this talk but sometimes half-form quantization is required. This happens when the space of left cosets G/H doesn't carry a left invariant measure, the solution is to tensor with a line bundle whose transition functions compensate for the failure of the measure to be left invariant.
The 2 girls walking up the 2 sets of 2d stairs, well how 2 dimensional, me I would be walking on M.C Escher's stairs. 50yrs ago I dropped a trip and walked up those stars. Although I know how to fit into homo sapiens reality, you've been a pain in the neck. I discovered quantum geometry over 23yrs ago and can render it.
As Christopher Alexander said its a system inside a system inside a system. IE. The micro & macro are superIMposed, the classical & quantum are superIMposed. In a wholistic systematization, recursively looping.
Simplectic geometry... The Janus Cosmological Model uses simplectic math. This model was developped with the help of JM Souriau, Who was one of the leading mathematicians of the simplectic field. You should look at it.
@@TheoriesofEverything Great to know. Please ask him about the Schwarzschild object and the link between simplectic geometry and the throat sphère, at its center after reaching its criticity (due to matter accretion). That is where simplectic math plays a role in the model. And about the fact that Timescape assume negative space curvature in voids, that would be same curvature that his model predicts, but the cause of such curvature is different.
Hey Curt, .Miranda SO sounds like she's touching on the new Plasmoid theories that surround the thunderstorm generator!! Do you know if she is? They sound like they are both connected! It would be awesome to know if these two things are leading us to new exotic energies. Glory Days ahead! Hopefully.😏🤟🤙✌️
15:08 " ...like trying to put an arrow that connects classical systems to quantum systems...how do we understand these arrows?" If the background energy field is behaves as a continuous medium, and subatomic particles behave as quantized packets of energy, then the "arrow" must be the continuous exchange between that field and the packets. We forget that we cannot simply borrow energy from the background field without a cost. That cost is volume taken from the background energy to generate a packet of energy we can manipulate. Where there is a pack of energy, there is a pocket of volume taken from the background field. This is not a one-time exchange, however. If that packet must move around, it then must replenish the field before it can move, and it must draw from the field in the direction of the desired movement. This exchange can be treated as a kind of "handshake" wheresoever the condensed energy is present. When a particle travels through a vacuum, it is constantly in communication with the background field. The same is true when it is not in motion, but idling in place. There is a continuous feed of communication between its position within the field and the amount of the field being consumed to produce this packet of energy. One operations ends and immediately a new one begins. This process does not end. In this respect, this continuous communication could be represented as a wave-like interaction, where peaks of the wave are expressed as objects (packets of energy) and nodes of the wave are expressed as motion. How do you rectify the timing of this exchange? When we look at photons and gravity, these phenomena propagate through space no faster than the speed of light. These phenomena are massively different in scale, yet they both travel no faster than the same speed. This would suggest that the background field has a limit to how fast an exchange can take place. And, in our finest observations, we cannot discern that it behaves faster than this constant rate. This rate appears to be the limiter for what generates a quantized state. If we assume that the exchange of information between the background field and a quantum particle is constantly occurring at the speed of light, then when two particles interact with one another, this will cause a decrease in momentum during the exchange. Then, when the exchange has concluded, momentum will be increased once more based on the new information resulting from the collision.
@24:00 isn't that a bit backwards? So what if a physical system can mimic any computation? The question was "can a computer mimic any physical system?". That's the one Penrose might say, "hall nah!" to, but in an Oxford accent. Then again, he is thinking mental events are physical events, which I think is false.
It's funny when the player has a second language...All the locations of all protons are held on the surface of the atom this is the quantum effect that creates the uniform size... that's why we can only interact with atoms of the same size ... there are atoms of larger and smaller sizes we can only interact with their gravity 28:31
@TheoriesofEverything because the platonic solids were hypothesized to be the shapes (geometry) of the smallest sub atomic particles (quantum). I guess I'm not as funny as I thought. 😅
Googles willow quantum chip is creating quantum geometry. I was bourne into this world, I was educated in this world, I worked with homo sapiens in this world, by force I comply with this world.
One thing - an exact position in Heisenbergian terms is never posible since during the time of measurement everything moves! A measurement without duration is impossible! By the way, do you see time as quantized? This video is very much to the point and important! Carry on!
I would like to make a version of this video with interjections by an AI avatar of David Hestenes using Geometric Algebra, Geometric Calculus and his papers on Real Quantum Mechanics and Gauge Theory Gravity.
@7:00 one of the problems here is in conceiving of classical reality as different in ontology. But it is not. What we measure classically is quantum mechanical. The "procedure" of "quantization" is not switching on a new ontology, it is moving to a _different framework of analysis,_ one that allows for entanglement. The spinor (all wavefunctions for fermions) is classical geometry, a dilation and rotation/boost instruction. When you write down an entangled transformation you are admitting classical mechanics is not exact and indivisible stochastic processes have to be accounted for. All the things that are real are real classically, and they are also quantum mechanical. The distinction is your frame of analysis, not Nature.
Honestly, I spent my life around Spanish speaking people and it was extremely difficult to follow what she is saying. I could not tell you if it was good mathematics or sophistry. I would need to take the entire video and transliterate it into English.
you invited questions going beyond this (very interesting) talk : how do the following play into particle physics : n-body problem Gödel's theorems Cauchy's residue theorem Chris
Integrable Systems: A Structured Explanation Core Definition: A classical integrable system on a 2n-dimensional phase space (symplectic manifold) possesses n independent, Poisson-commuting conserved quantities (first integrals). These functions f 1 , f 2 , … , f n f 1 ,f 2 ,…,f n satisfy: { f i , f j } PB = 0 for all i , j , {f i ,f j } PB =0for all i,j, where { ⋅ , ⋅ } PB {⋅,⋅} PB is the Poisson bracket. Arnold-Liouville Theorem: If these functions are non-degenerate (their differentials are linearly independent), the system’s motion is confined to invariant tori (Liouville tori). Locally, the phase space splits into a fibration of these tori. In action-angle coordinates, the symplectic form becomes: ω = ∑ i = 1 n d I i ∧ d θ i , ω= i=1 ∑ n dI i ∧dθ i , where I i I i (actions) are conserved, and θ i θ i (angles) evolve linearly in time. Geometric Interpretation: The conserved quantities generate a torus action (symmetry) on the phase space. Dynamics reduce to quasi-periodic motion on these tori, making solutions explicit. Example: The 2D harmonic oscillator has two commuting integrals (energy and angular momentum), leading to motion on a 2-torus. Contrast with Non-Integrable Systems: Systems like the three-body problem lack enough conserved quantities, leading to chaotic motion. Integrability is rare and often requires specific symmetries. Role in Quantization: Integrable systems provide natural action-angle variables for geometric quantization. The Bohr-Sommerfeld condition selects quantized tori: ∮ I i
d θ i = 2 π ℏ ( n i + corrections ) , ∮I i dθ i =2πℏ(n i +corrections), linking classical conserved quantities to quantum numbers. Key Takeaway: Integrable systems are "solvable" due to sufficient symmetries (conserved quantities), enabling reduction to invariant tori. This structure bridges classical and quantum mechanics, guiding quantization through geometric methods.
12:40 Obviously, the original quantum theory is discrete*, however, modern interpretation of the "smeared".** ---------------- *) - A. 0.Planck's theory of energy quanta. 1.The photo effect by Einstein (a photon has energy). 2.The Compton effect (a photon has a momentum). 3.The Rutherford-Bohr model. 4.De Broglie's hypothesis. 5.Finally:"Quantum theory is not the same radical theory as RT." (Einstein). B.So cleverly arranged. 0.By solving the Schrodinger equation for a free particle, it is possible to obtain a complete state function, which is a plane monochromatic wave and coincides with the de Broglie wave. 1.This coincidence, of course, is not accidental, since the de Broglie hypothesis was used from the very beginning in the development of quantum mechanics, which received reliable experimental confirmation. 2.But the normalization condition is not fulfilled for the wave function: physically, this is due to the fact that absolutely free particles do not exist in nature, however, mathematically it is easier to apply this function in quantum theory.Why? 3.It should always be remembered that the wave function is a mathematical object and "it" cannot be found even experimentally by direct measurement (arbitrariness in the phase multiplier does not lead to the observed effects, since in this theory it is convenient to talk about the position of a microparticle only in space). 4.Thus, all the successes of quantum theory lie in the manipulation of facts and interpretation: 5.The de Broglie wave "suddenly" coincides with the fundamentally unobservable "?", and gives real answers to experimental questions thanks to de Broglie, 6.And applause to Born or Everett (... and others). Bravo! 7.But the age-old encore game is exhausting. **) - The de Broglie hypothesis says nothing about the nature of "waves of matter"; de Broglie waves cannot be considered as waves in some material medium. Their physical meaning has yet to be clarified. And physicists expressed the incomprehensible in an even more vague way: waves of probability or their branching.
“I have an equation, do you have one as well” Prof, as with Dirac, could ask us the same question. 😅. Brilliant mathematician and lecturer ! Wow …. She mentioned “the art of war” by Sun Tzu ! Conflict from the interpersonal to international …. Supposed irreconcilability of classic and quantum worlds and their peaceful reconciliation. On point ! Thank you Curt !
@@tracik1277 thanks for the heads up. I was just about to fall asleep to this and I know what you mean - some discussions get into your dreams when you fall asleep listening, and it's not always good
Constant flux speed = non-normalized GR backdrop volume length. Planck flux speed = constant flux speed divided by loop density. Relativistic Planck length = Planck flux speed divided by (flux speed constant + vortex axis positional movement velocity). Flux Tubes and Length Contraction do to rotational angular frequency: Flux tubes with starting circumference ℎ and starting radius ℏ experience length contraction as they move with angular frequency * distance from rotational axis. This contraction is proportional to the growth of mass and the curvature of the vortex field. As Planck flux speed takes a longer path before completing a full circle, Planck time dilates, leading to a conversion of Planck force into a different form of work, resulting in Planck force differential gravity. Planck Length Gradient: Beyond the angular frequency radius, Planck length contraction occurs, while reversing the gravity field within that radius. The central axis likely has a larger flux tube, with weaker, length-contracted flux tube filaments radiating from its poles. These filaments break and reform constantly due to higher positional movement velocity, while the central flux tube remains relatively intact. Planck Flux speed contraction from Feedback Loops of flux speed constant (the appearance of inflation): Planck flux is constantly forming feedback loops of flux speed constant, slowing Planck flux down universally, shortening Planck lengths while forming more (when Planck flux speed slows down, longer lengths break down, do to less relative push, allowing them to be perturbed and bifurcate till length and speed reach equilibrium [enough feedback loops of constant flux speed to curve Planck flux, but not so much to cause destabilizing wobbles, therefore as Planck flux decreases, the Planck length follows, and forms more Planck vortices to move through]). The Planck length gradient moves with the planet, solar system, star clusters, and galaxy, dragging the Planck field and causing the Planck force differential (gravity), because Relativistic Planck length = (Planck flux speed) divided by (flux speed constant + vortex axis positional movement velocity). This explains gravity, the weakening of Planck force as the vortices move causing distribution of Planck force, and the equivalence of special relativistic length contraction and general relativity within the non-normalized GR backdrop volume as the vortices are moving within that volume. Dark matter, dark energy is caused by lesser special relativistic positional movements of Planck vortices, they have shorter Planck time and longer relativistic Planck length. This unites quantum mechanics and general relativity, and provides firm and accurate foundation for energy conservation. The photon energy is described as a spherical wave (or curved egg-shaped wave near a black hole), which passes through Planck vortices as a spin reorientation. The banding of the wave is determined by the local convergence of Planck spin phase, amplitude, polarization, and direction of a cascade, which affects the probability of detecting photon momentum, even though the energy is there. The photon energy is a spherical wave (or curved egg-shaped wave evolution near a black hole), which passes through Planck vortices as a angular axis spin reorientation. Banding of the Wave: The banding of the wave is determined by the local convergence of reorientation frequency, phase [reorientation rotated direction], amplitude [number of neighbors], and polarization [reorientation rotation direction], and direction of the cascade, which affects the probability of detecting photon momentum. Converging Photon Energy: The momentum = converging photon energy is given by the formula: Converging photon energy = Planck angular momentum vortex spin axis reorientation frequency × same reorientation phase × same reorientation polarization × number of neighbors activated × same travel direction. When these angular and linear drive factors are aligned and cascading together in the same direction through the Planck field, they create a concerted push rather than counteracting each other. This is not the Planck angular momentum itself, but rather the change in its spin axis, which is communicated by the Planck flux angular momentum, which cascades to other Planck units within the Planck field. As you can see, it's very simple, the wave isn't fundamental, it is requiring the angular quanta to transmit it to other angular quanta, and general relativity is special relativity acting on Planck vortices within GR backdrop space (not meter space, which is not fundamental energy conservation).
Whats this got to do with me walking to dovey knights County store when i was 8 years old to get 6 pack bottles of coke. If i had my bottles. 1953. Dirt road
VIDEO 34 Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. THE MISSING SECRET OF LIGHT PART 1 - ua-cam.com/video/vBKZOl_dRlQ/v-deo.html VIDEO 35 Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. THE MISSING SECRET OF LIGHT PART 2 - ua-cam.com/video/CUMP6-Gos2I/v-deo.html
This idea of a simulation....it seems a bit presumptuous. It's seems far more likely to me that our computers reflect underlying codes and structures that exist in the universe, rather than the other way around. I think this position that since, for example, error codes have been discovered in supersymmetry equations, there must be aliens, or our future selves (somehow) behind the simulation, is an reflexive response motivated by our desire to protect our current ontological model. Long story short; these codes, DNA included, imply some type of creator, or at least something akin to panpsychism. Im not sure I understand why this poses such a problem for people. Tremendous evidence in favor of some sort of field based intelligence has oversight over evolutionary process, etc; consciousness emerging at the quantum level, non neural cognition, respnse driven adaptations in mammals, reptiles, and trees, are a few good examples.
I think Basil Hiley (close collegue of the great late David Bohm) who has been doing this before she was born, has a better deterministic geometric quantization for QFT including gravity and the non locality of entanglement with the quantum potential using quaternions, nilpotents, twistors, the Einstein 4-vector and Heisenberg position momentum approach instead of a wave function. ua-cam.com/video/JhXLInpiEE0/v-deo.htmlsi=-TmZ3nLeQFhbSYnf
I am following this semi-classical explication. But it is missing some contextualization. Consider the coupled harmonic oscillator, such a fruitful model, tori result because the coupling between the oscillators is negligible, integrable. If the coupling is it is separable into modes, renormalizable, as long as the fiber bundle flow is subcritical. If the coupling is strong, you have non-renormalization, turbulent flow of your fiber bundles. Computationally this the difference between a halting process, non halting process, or a critical zone (see Collatz) where we can't prove it is halting or not by class (computing a Normal transcendental but not a Chaitin's constant).
Join My New Substack (Personal Writings & Early Access to Episodes): curtjaimungal.substack.com
Souriau was a mathematician involved in simplectic math. He helped to develop the idea of the Janus Cosmological Model.
You should look at It.
Flux Tubes and Length Contraction Due to Rotational Angular Frequency
Flux tubes with a starting circumference ℎ and starting radius ℏ experience length contraction as they move with angular frequency multiplied by the distance from the rotational axis. This contraction is proportional to the growth of mass and the curvature of the vortex field. As Planck flux speed takes a longer path before completing a full circle, Planck time dilates, leading to a conversion of Planck force into a different form of work, resulting in Planck force differential gravity. Planck Length Contraction and Gravity Field : The relative Planck length is given by: Relative Planck length = Planck flux speed / (constant flux speed + movement velocity of the Planck vortex)
Planck Length Gradient
Beyond the angular frequency radius, Planck length contraction occurs, reversing the gravity field within that radius. The central axis likely has a larger flux tube, with weaker, length-contracted flux tube filaments radiating from its poles. These filaments break and reform constantly due to higher positional movement velocity, while the central flux tube remains relatively intact.
Planck Flux Speed Contraction from Feedback Loops of Flux Speed Constant (Appearance of Inflation)
Planck flux is constantly forming feedback loops of flux speed constant, slowing Planck flux down. The Planck length gradient moves with the planet, solar system, star clusters, and galaxy, dragging the Planck field and causing Planck force differential (gravity). This explains gravity, the weakening of Planck force, and the equivalence of special relativistic length contraction and general relativity.
Dark Energy, Dark Matter, and Large Voids
Large voids with lesser special relativistic positional movements of Planck vortices have shorter Planck time and longer relativistic Planck length. This framework explains dark energy, dark matter, gravity, fundamental mass formation, and the physical foundations of quantum mechanics (this is not meter space [which ignores Planck length contraction], this is non-normalized GR backdrop space for accurate energy conservation).
Photon as a Spherical Wave
The photon energy is a spherical wave (or curved egg-shaped wave when near a black hole), which passes through Planck vortices as a rotational change in angular momentum axis.
Banding of the Wave
The banding of the wave is determined by the local convergence of phase, amplitude, polarization, and direction of cascade, which affects the probability of detecting photon momentum.
Converging Photon Energy
The momentum of converging photon energy is given by the formula: Converging photon energy = Planck angular momentum vortex spin axis reorientation frequency × same reorientation phase × same reorientation polarization × number of neighbors activated × same travel direction
Angular Drive Factors
When the angular drive factors are aligned and cascading in the same direction through the Planck field, they create a concerted push rather than counteracting each other. This is not the Planck angular momentum itself, but rather the change in its spin axis, which cascades to other Planck units within the Planck field.
Flux Tubes and Length Contraction do to rotational angular frequency: Flux tubes with starting local relative circumference ℎ and starting local relative radius ℏ experience length contraction as they move with angular frequency * distance from angular rotational axis. This contraction is proportional to the growth of mass and the curvature of the vortex field. As Planck flux speed takes a longer path before completing a full circle, Planck time dilates, leading to a conversion of Planck force into a different form of work, resulting in Planck force differential gravity. Planck Length Contraction and Gravity Field: Relative Planck length = Planck flux speed / (constant flux speed + positional movement velocity of the Planck vortex in non-normalized GR backdrop space). Planck Length Gradient: Beyond the angular frequency radius, Planck length contraction occurs, reversing the gravity field within that radius. The central axis likely has a larger flux tube, with weaker, length-contracted flux tube filaments radiating from its poles. These filaments break and reform constantly due to higher positional movement velocity, while the central flux tube remains relatively intact. Planck Flux speed contraction from Feedback Loops of flux speed constant (the appearance of inflation): Planck flux is constantly forming feedback loops of flux speed constant, slowing Planck flux down. The Planck length gradient moves with the planet, solar system, star clusters, and galaxy, dragging the Planck field and causing Planck force differential (gravity). This explains gravity, the weakening of Planck force, and the equivalence of special relativistic length contraction and general relativity (within non-normalized GR backdrop volume length = flux speed constant length). Dark Energy, Dark Matter, and Large voids with lesser special relativistic positional movements of Planck vortices have shorter Planck time and longer relativistic Planck length. This framework explains dark energy, dark matter, gravity, fundamental mass formation, and the physical foundations of quantum mechanics. Photon as a Spherical Wave: The photon is described as a spherical wave (or egg-shaped wave near a black hole), which passes through Planck vortices as a spin reorientation. Banding of the Wave: The banding of the wave is determined by the local convergence of phase, amplitude, and polarization, and direction of cascade, which affects the probability of detecting photon momentum. Converging Photon Energy: The momentum of converging photon energy is given by the formula: Converging photon energy = Planck angular momentum vortex spin axis reorientation frequency × same reorientation phase × same reorientation polarization × number of neighbors activated × same travel direction (with spherical correction). Angular Drive Factors: When the angular drive factors are aligned and cascading in the same direction through the Planck field, they create a concerted push rather than counteracting each other. This is not the Planck angular momentum itself, but rather the change in its spin axis, which cascades to other Planck units within the Planck field. As you can see, it's very simple, the wave isn't fundamental, and general relativity is special relativity acting on Planck vortices (within non-normalized GR backdrop space). Non-normalized GR backdrop space conserves the amount of flux speed constant and Planck flux speed slows down and forms more units to move through as flux speed constant forms more loops (decreasing the Planck force everywhere, shrinking mass observers, and bifurcating Planck lengths to form more Planck units), meaning we no longer need inflation. The reason why the photon momentum grows when travelling down a Planck force differential gradient (gravity field), is because a contracted Planck length has less Planck mass, the photon energy will have more relative effect. Relative Planck length = Planck flux speed / (constant flux speed + positional movement velocity of the Planck vortex in non-normalized GR backdrop space). Where non-normalized GR backdrop volume length is flux speed constant, everything in the cosmos forms within that measure of real volume as Planck flux is constantly forming feedback loops of flux speed constant, slowing Planck flux down everywhere, while relativistic Planck length differentials derives from the positional movements of these vortices within GR backdrop space. The thing that was missed is that, the Planck length gradient moves with the planet, solar system, star clusters, and galaxy, dragging the Planck field and causing Planck force differential (gravity), by positional movement being inversely proportional to relativistic Planck length. This explains gravity, the weakening of Planck force, and the equivalence of special relativistic length contraction and general relativity. Dark Energy, Dark Matter, and Large voids with lesser special relativistic positional movements of Planck vortices have shorter Planck time and longer relativistic Planck length. This means you are pushed towards other masses by the Planck force differential, rather than attracted, there is no such thing as attraction when you account for everything, it is the bisector reflection of inverse directional momentum on local intersect. Fundamental Momentum = square root [x_ConstantFluxtotal^2, y_ConstantFluxtotal^2, z_ConstantFluxtotal^2] to add all the vector direction differentials of flux speed constant in the volume of non-normalized GR backdrop space you are measuring, anywhere.
@@TheoriesofEverything What do you think of the work of the German physicist Burkhard Heim? Could you make a contribution to this? His (error-corrected) discrete geometrization produced results that have not been achieved again to this day.
Constant flux speed = non-normalized GR backdrop volume length. Planck flux speed = constant flux speed divided by loop density. Relativistic Planck length = Planck flux speed divided by (flux speed constant + vortex axis positional movement velocity). Flux Tubes and Length Contraction do to rotational angular frequency: Flux tubes with starting circumference ℎ and starting radius ℏ experience length contraction as they move with angular frequency * distance from rotational axis. This contraction is proportional to the growth of mass and the curvature of the vortex field. As Planck flux speed takes a longer path before completing a full circle, Planck time dilates, leading to a conversion of Planck force into a different form of work, resulting in Planck force differential gravity. Planck Length Gradient: Beyond the angular frequency radius, Planck length contraction occurs, while reversing the gravity field within that radius. The central axis likely has a larger flux tube, with weaker, length-contracted flux tube filaments radiating from its poles. These filaments break and reform constantly due to higher positional movement velocity, while the central flux tube remains relatively intact. Planck Flux speed contraction from Feedback Loops of flux speed constant (the appearance of inflation): Planck flux is constantly forming feedback loops of flux speed constant, slowing Planck flux down universally, shortening Planck lengths while forming more (when Planck flux speed slows down, longer lengths break down, do to less relative push, allowing them to be perturbed and bifurcate till length and speed reach equilibrium [enough feedback loops of constant flux speed to curve Planck flux, but not so much to cause destabilizing wobbles, therefore as Planck flux decreases, the planck length follows, and forms more Planck vortices to move through]). The Planck length gradient moves with the planet, solar system, star clusters, and galaxy, dragging the Planck field and causing the Planck force differential (gravity), because Relativistic Planck length = (Planck flux speed) divided by (flux speed constant + vortex axis positional movement velocity). This explains gravity, the weakening of Planck force as the vortices move causing distribution of Planck force, and the equivalence of special relativistic length contraction and general relativity within the non-normalized GR backdrop volume as the vortices are moving within that volume. Dark matter, dark energy is caused by lesser special relativistic positional movements of Planck vortices, they have shorter Planck time and longer relativistic Planck length. This unites quantum mechanics and general relativity, and provides firm and accurate foundation for energy conservation. The photon energy is described as a spherical wave (or curved egg-shaped wave near a black hole), which passes through Planck vortices as a spin reorientation. The banding of the wave is determined by the local convergence of Planck reorientation frequency, phase, amplitude, polarization, and direction of cascade, which affects the probability of detecting photon momentum, even though the energy is there. The photon energy is a spherical wave (or curved egg-shaped wave evolution near a black hole), which passes through Planck vortices as a angular axis spin reorientation. Banding of the Wave: The banding of the wave is determined by the local convergence of reorientation frequency, phase [reorientation rotated direction], amplitude [number of reoriented neighbors], and polarization [reorientation rotation direction], and direction of the cascade, which affects the probability of detecting photon momentum. Converging Photon Energy: The momentum = converging photon energy is given by the formula: Converging photon energy = Planck angular momentum vortex spin axis reorientation frequency × same reorientation phase × same reorientation polarization × number of neighbors activated × same travel direction. When these angular and linear drive factors are aligned and cascading together in the same direction through the Planck field, they create a concerted push rather than counteracting each other. This is not the Planck angular momentum itself, but rather the change in its spin axis, which is communicated by the Planck flux angular momentum, which cascades to other Planck units within the Planck field. As you can see, it's very simple, the wave isn't fundamental, and general relativity is special relativity acting on Planck vortices within GR backdrop space. Masses are pushed towards other masses by the Planck force differential.
Amazing masterclass on geometric quantization!! Please keep sharing this type of content with the world since, as you said, there aren't many lectures free on the web.
Many thanks! 🤩
Thank you! I’m glad you found this video helpful.
I can't help but think of Alain Connes work. It would make sense to have Prof. Connes on your podcast Curt.
Working on it.
Excellent!! At some point you have to consider anti-symmetry!
Such a good mathematical physicist! Loved her accent too. Curt, you are playing the role of Marin Mersenne, the polymath post box of Europe ;-)
I would like to see discussion of her line of reasoning because it leans very heavily on mathematics and reminds me of statements made by David Hestenes regarding Pauli Algebra and Dirac's derivation of his equation. To me, she sounds weak as a physicist but very strong as a mathematician so I feel like I'm watching Weyl vs. Einstein Round 2. Einstein dissed Weyl as an authority on Physics but Weyl's ideas eventually became very useful and while Einstein's physical intuition was very strong he actually got the math wrong about a second clock effect according to Hobson and Lazenby.
@@BlueGiant69202 Still useful to better understand how to characterize what is worth 1st quantization. Algebraic geometry to me.
Upvoting William's comment!
Thanks William! 😃
Question about plus around 52:38 or so. The log on the matrix to have the right form involves addition for so(3).
A Lie algebra is like the logarithm of a Lie Group, approximately. This goes in reverse, a Lie Group is like the exponential of a Lie Algebra (for those in the know, the generators of a Lie Algebra come from how the Lie Group evolves in the tangent space near the identity of the Lie Group). Multiplication in Lie Groups ~ Commutation in Lie Algebras.
Yes, you can think that the multiplication in lie groups when derives gives the brackets (which you call commutator thinking of physics but do not need to commute). This is a good point.
She not only knows her stuff, she can explain it so well that non-physicists have a fighting chance.
“Wax on. Wax off!”
Had to stop again and transmit this thought/question…
When she was speaking of polarization and manifolds I had a vision of a Pearl.
You have the “General” in the sphere and “quantum” on the surface…it is the “chaotic” reflection/refraction called CHATOYANCE.
Something we cannot accurately calculate, but know it is BEAUTIFUL!
Is this a relevant visualization Eva?
Hi, I like this metaphorical approach that you make. In a way you can think of these polarizations as a "filter" of solutions so it acts like a the Pearl situation that you describe. Thanks for bringing this image up. I like it!
@ thank you, just trying to help some of us that can’t do all the “math”, but are bridges between natural physics and creating useful products.
Thank you again for the presentation Prof Miranda, looking forward to the next one. 😊✌🏼
@@brandonb5075 this is beautiful. Thanks a lot! Happy to be here for the next one 😀
There is another comment where the guy takes issue of her use of the term magical, I had to reply with a similar anecdote, trying to make the point that there is a difference between natural being super and being supernatural, that her use of the term magical was referring to her awe of the beauty of fundamental nature.
@ no doubt…it makes me sad when people have lost the idea of “magic” in their lives…the deterministic materialist is caught in a BINARY TRAP of their own making.
They are easily triggered; she wasn’t referring to Merlin and a wand! 😂
Nature is MAGICAL, Life is MAGICAL, our Existence is MAGICAL…
Hopefully they will open up and come on this amazing journey that is beginning NOW!
Have a wonderful evening Pete!✌🏼
I wish I could spend time with both of you to teach me!
It would be nice to have about 4 hours dedicated to the three minutes from 9.30 to 12.30
I agree!
Some help on understanding the term's "quantum's definition" in this science help - I have been researching for its simplified approach to its use for years - like the atomic definition to a circumstance.
When reaching a level to small to view, but it shows it has activities inside, this view area is grouped for recording the patterns found from a view's point of view - a squared of area easily recorded being present.
And example to get an understanding building support:
The atom is to small to actually view but its activities become apparent to a view point from a second layer step out.
This is showing things like the electron is very fluent with flow properties.
{Thus the area under is always changing, as its shapes and pattern's current support to the outer view layer.}
The example -
Taking the effects of the river/creek's water flow to the sediment area building, clearly will show the sediment sizes by weight will be layered properly, 1st rule of engineering skill building.
Maybe the view avoidance is as mentioned, a wave logic being searched for.
Why?
The individual parts of the atom has 2 different energies building it.
The PROTON and than the ELECTRON.
Watch one or the other or both at the same time logic being searched for!
So for the second layer with viewing support has this question to solve:
At what point of both energies cooperation does the support for the 2 layer to rest on starts - for mass building?
Don't forget about friction/dissipation let ups to over worked logics.
For machine research from my comments, to remember to applied the point of reaching no bumps to worry about, is the friction logic to overcome, with a stable mas/weight to work with.
*****
Would be great to bring more symplectic geometry and non commutativity guests, you would love Floer theory is beautiful.
I would be happy to talk about Floer theory if you want!
@evamiranda4275 I have a feeling a part 2 of this conversation on the way , well done Eva was nice presentation.
Would be nice to have more highlights on Donaldson work, also explaining the hodge theory in relation to Floer and so on. Floer theory gone through a lots of effort without wide acknowledgement. I think people should learn about it more.
Not even mention the relationship to string theory or how some works been crossed between these subjects.
Floer theory is one of the most beautiful mathematical adventure when I was reading back it's development it's truly amazing
@@JAYMOAP yes, indeed part 2 is thought to go in the direction of explaining a geometric approach to Navier-Stokes equations and connection to computer science. I would be happy to talk about Floer theory and the connections to problems in Celestial mechanics, this would be probably for another discussion. Then, I could try to talk more general about Symplectic Geometry and contributions of Donaldson as you mention.
Although I'm not qualified, I watched this for the suspense, like an Edgar Poe mystery, and by the end I was so involved that I was like (and I apologize in advance for the joke) "Bitch, you better have my manifold!"
I am glad you enjoyed the conversation for the suspense of it! I do my best to be a good story-teller 😁
🛸She walked on water on this one. 🌊〰️
Thank you 😍
@43:00 it is not "magical", at least I don't think. Curt's question was deeper. In Newtonian mechanics there is no Poisson bracket, position and momentum are independent. Only once a Hamilton function is defined do you have the conjugate Poisson bracket relations. That requires a judicious choice of "canonical" coordinates, i.e., you have to know the symmetries (or equivalently conservation laws). The exact symmetries might not be known, in which case you can only chug away with Newton. The amazing thing is the symmetries for elementary physical systems are pretty simple and we do know them.
@@Achrononmaster you a watchmaker, historian or a time traveler? I like the name..
Let me tell you a quick anecdote,
On a long trip, driving all night, heading Southeast in a snowstorm. Around sunrise on a very straight section of the highway I reached the point in the storm where the air was exactly at the freezing point, everything else was still below freezing. The snow has turned to a slushy rain I was freezing solid to everything it touched, the sunrise was perfectly aligned with the ice crystals search that the edges of every surface of all the tree branches became prismatic sparkles and rainbows , and despite gliding with no traction I knew and had absolutely no fear knowing I would keep going in a straight line and nobody else was on the road.
It was magical.
I'm almost certain that that's what she means by magical, that she is seeing the beauty and balance in the universe, just awed by fundamental nature.
No way she was calling it magic.
Natural superness versus supernatural.
@@petevenuti7355 exactly! Thanks for the beautiful image!
Emily Noether, one of the greatest mathematicians.
Fantastic Guest. Very inspiring conversation. Thx ))))))
Thanks Thomas! 😄
Great interview with Prof. Miranda. Enjoyed it very much. Her eyes are even more violet than Elizabeth Taylor’s.
Thanks a lot. I appreciate your comments. I loved that you compared my eyes to Elizabeth Taylor's (you made my day 😃). It is the UV filer in my glasses that generates the purple effect.
Amazing - thanks for having her on
Thanks 😄
That was wonderful. I cannot wait for the Navier-Stokes episode!
Many thanks for your comment! 😄 I am also looking forward to preparing the next episode. It is on the way!
So, there can be both Commutativeness and Anti-Communtationness.
My favourite topic
Great stuff, understood enough to follow along... kind of
Thanks!😄
@53:00 isn't it better to just note the Lie algebra generators X live in a vector space _V_ that is equipped with a Lie bracket, so you from inception have operations •, +, ∧. The (Lie) symmetry group is obtained _from_ the exponential map exp(X) on the X. In other words, you _start_ with a vector space, not with a Lie manifold. The interesting thing occurs when the symmetry group involves non-connected components (from mirror inversions for example) which is additional topology resulting in different Lie groups with the same Lie algebra. This is where the Lie algebra fails to fully capture the global structure of the Lie group, which is super important, since you need a double cover to retrieve a connected Lie manifold. I think thar is physics content in thar.
You know everything's connected and we know everything's connected, so just get together and write it down hahaha
2 ends of the same scale, quantum physics and the macro universe, in between the spin, torsion the function that unravels the fabric of space/time into a 5th reality from where no need of machines to knit layers of atoms according to standard physics to gravity and the electrons natural path. A geometry where torsion energy knits structures according to quantum geometry. Wolfram found the geometry, Mandelbrot found the spin, Bohr found the quantum, Einstein found the universe and our ancestors found pi and phi. Together we have quantum geometry. One thing missing is how to render this physics. Quantum 3d printing out of the energy of the vacuum. Quantum geometry?
This is my weekend watch list.
To avoid the confusion presented by those trapped in the ivory tower
9x9. Under your nose. The whole damn time
Digitally root the table and you have geometric quantization
Let's think about quantum. Think small. That's me.
@22:00 you do not know the "laws of physics" - so you cannot ask the question "are they computable?". You can only ask if your current specified model is computable (will always halt on any initial conditions, on in CT terms "will always be knowably either possible or impossible.").
By "geometric," I guess it is to be understood that we are talking about something that has a shape, and in which time itself is part of this shape. And this shape can be visualized by a brain that is powerful enough. Visualised all at once, instantly. It is just like the Block Universe. I wonder if this understanding of mine is correct. 🙄
@@Julio_Siqueira - physicist are low level thinkers, and they are limited; restricted by their laws of physics. Physics is a dead end! However we Meta-physicist, know that we are not restricted by dead end Laws, and our universe is endless, and in our universe are the dead ends of all of the great Physicist; as the Meta-physical universe continues on, boundless borders. SOMETHING IS MISSING?🤔
Thank you Curt and Eva.
I would love to hear you interview Nassim Haramein.
Take good care.
Peace
Yea id love to see a Nassim.Haramein interview with some actual push back on some of his ideas. I've only seen softball interviews, but I've been hearing him make humongous claims for 15 years now and all we got is a crystal that to me, personally, doesn't seem to do much. Just saying it'd be nice to see him interviewed by somebody that could give a lot deeper into his claims instead of just outright believing every word he says
Eva mentioned Casimirs. Historical comment: I met Hendrik Casimir once during a lustrum of the Huygens Dispuut - a student club of the Faculty of Science of University of Leiden (Netherlands) that counted many famous members in the past and frequent visitors to its meetings, among whom Ehrenfest, Einstein and DeSitter. Casimir was a student of Ehrenfest, and later he became Director of the Philips Physical Lab in Eindhoven. In later age he wrote brilliant columns for some Dutch newspaper. He died age 91 in 2000.
@@franknijhoff6009 - That the problem with physics, and physicist, they come to dead ends. The Universe is Abstract; Metaphysical, and does not end, nor rely on mathematics, because the Meta-Physicist are infinite, eternal IMAGINEERS, no mathematics required.🤯🤔👀🙏🏾
So much fun ... All the locations of all protons are held on the surface of the atom this is the quantum effect that creates the uniform size... that's why we can only interact with atoms of the same size ... there are atoms of larger and smaller sizes we can only interact with their gravity
WOW that was really useful, thanksnobody ever says that
It's magical that we observe what we observe in this configuration, we rely on the one and the zero.
@@seva-lapsha - one and zero is binary; digital state. We have discovered, and moved into the quantum frontier, where there are more than ON and Off, and rather than particles, it’s waves, fields, electric/magnetic fields of endless possibilities. Imagination rules in the Quantum Universe, and Imagination does not require mathematics.
@adolphdooley3632 let me know if you need any help.
Einstein did not know how to derive the value of 'h' (Planck's constant) within the context of Classical Electrodynamics (Maxwell theory). If we can derive the dimensionless fine-structure constant from for instance mathematical 'Chaos theory' constants (and other math constants) then it is possible to derive the value of 'h' from Classical Electrodynamics. The Planck constant was determined by Planck from the black-body radiation energy-spectrum (as a function of the black-body temperature), however, this constant seems totally unrelated to the constants from CED theory. Dr. Miranda, do you agree that a classical derivation of the value of 'h' should be part of the theory that you are working on?
Thank you for the lecture ..
Thank you ..
Glad you liked it 😄
Which comes first, the wave or particle?
Force
Energy
Been looking forward to this one for a while!
Haven't finished watching yet but if there's no mention of the orbit method or the theory of induced representations I'm going to be salty as hell >__<
EDIT: orbit method briefly alluded to at 54:30 but no explicit mention of orbit method of theory of induced reps... Sigh.... Was a good conversation but was hoping the deep connections to the theory of linear representatioins would be mentioned.
For anyone curious, geometric quantization can be thought of as a method of producing unitary representations of symmetry from coadjoint orbits of Lie groups. The algorithm is roughly as follows:
Step i) Start with a dual Lie algebra element f of a Lie group G
Step ii) Find the stabalizer subgroup of f, denoted G_f, which is the subgroup such that the coadjoint action leaves f invariant. The coadjoint orbit of f is just the space of left cosets G/G_f .
Step iii) Compute the symplectic form by taking the Maurer-Cartan form of G and composing it with f to get a real value 1-form on G, take the exterior derivative of that 1-form to get a 2-form. This 2-form is degenerate but it's actually the pull-back of non-degenerate 2-form on G/G_f, the latter is the symplectic form.
Step iv) Check that your coadjoint orbit is integral (see top of slide at 1:31:13). This is equivalent to the condition that the Lie algebra rep of G_f defined by f integrates to a Lie group rep \chi_f: G_f -> C.
Step v) Conditional on the success of the previous step, take the rep \chi_f and induce from it a representation of the full group G (this uses the symplectic form computed in step iii). The vectors in this induced rep are the sections of the pre-quantum line bundle.
Step v) The resulting representation is reducible, so to make it irreducible we have to introduce a polarization. This consists of a maximal Lie subalgebra h containing the Lie algebra of G_f such that f([X,Y]) = 0 for all X and Y in h. This condition (at least in the case of real polarizations) ensures f extends to a Lie alg rep of h, and integrality ensures that \chi_f extends to a rep of the corresponding Lie group H. The space of polarized sections are then the vectors of the induced rep of \chi_f viewed as a representation of H.
Step vi) Was only briefly mentioned in this talk but sometimes half-form quantization is required. This happens when the space of left cosets G/H doesn't carry a left invariant measure, the solution is to tensor with a line bundle whose transition functions compensate for the failure of the measure to be left invariant.
Research boy detected!!!
Did this cause purple eyes ?
🤣
The double slit is both micro & macro in scale. We can see the result!
When they interfere with the dynamics of the world as we know it'll go backwards
The 2 girls walking up the 2 sets of 2d stairs, well how 2 dimensional, me I would be walking on M.C Escher's stairs. 50yrs ago I dropped a trip and walked up those stars. Although I know how to fit into homo sapiens reality, you've been a pain in the neck. I discovered quantum geometry over 23yrs ago and can render it.
As Christopher Alexander said its a system inside a system inside a system. IE. The micro & macro are superIMposed, the classical & quantum are superIMposed. In a wholistic systematization, recursively looping.
Lots of new physical technology is apparently extant, so it stands to reason that we don't all know everything.
Simplectic geometry... The Janus Cosmological Model uses simplectic math. This model was developped with the help of JM Souriau, Who was one of the leading mathematicians of the simplectic field.
You should look at it.
Jean-Pierre Petit will be coming on shortly.
@@TheoriesofEverything
Great to know.
Please ask him about the Schwarzschild object and the link between simplectic geometry and the throat sphère, at its center after reaching its criticity (due to matter accretion). That is where simplectic math plays a role in the model.
And about the fact that Timescape assume negative space curvature in voids, that would be same curvature that his model predicts, but the cause of such curvature is different.
Hey Curt,
.Miranda SO sounds like she's touching on the new Plasmoid theories that surround the thunderstorm generator!! Do you know if she is? They sound like they are both connected! It would be awesome to know if these two things are leading us to new exotic energies. Glory Days ahead! Hopefully.😏🤟🤙✌️
She is going to talk about geometry apply to the quantum world. One property of space/time is geometry . Everything occurs in it.
15:08 " ...like trying to put an arrow that connects classical systems to quantum systems...how do we understand these arrows?"
If the background energy field is behaves as a continuous medium, and subatomic particles behave as quantized packets of energy, then the "arrow" must be the continuous exchange between that field and the packets.
We forget that we cannot simply borrow energy from the background field without a cost. That cost is volume taken from the background energy to generate a packet of energy we can manipulate.
Where there is a pack of energy, there is a pocket of volume taken from the background field.
This is not a one-time exchange, however. If that packet must move around, it then must replenish the field before it can move, and it must draw from the field in the direction of the desired movement.
This exchange can be treated as a kind of "handshake" wheresoever the condensed energy is present.
When a particle travels through a vacuum, it is constantly in communication with the background field. The same is true when it is not in motion, but idling in place. There is a continuous feed of communication between its position within the field and the amount of the field being consumed to produce this packet of energy.
One operations ends and immediately a new one begins. This process does not end. In this respect, this continuous communication could be represented as a wave-like interaction, where peaks of the wave are expressed as objects (packets of energy) and nodes of the wave are expressed as motion.
How do you rectify the timing of this exchange?
When we look at photons and gravity, these phenomena propagate through space no faster than the speed of light. These phenomena are massively different in scale, yet they both travel no faster than the same speed. This would suggest that the background field has a limit to how fast an exchange can take place. And, in our finest observations, we cannot discern that it behaves faster than this constant rate. This rate appears to be the limiter for what generates a quantized state.
If we assume that the exchange of information between the background field and a quantum particle is constantly occurring at the speed of light, then when two particles interact with one another, this will cause a decrease in momentum during the exchange. Then, when the exchange has concluded, momentum will be increased once more based on the new information resulting from the collision.
@24:00 isn't that a bit backwards? So what if a physical system can mimic any computation? The question was "can a computer mimic any physical system?". That's the one Penrose might say, "hall nah!" to, but in an Oxford accent. Then again, he is thinking mental events are physical events, which I think is false.
Agreed. Maybe she is inventing
It's funny when the player has a second language...All the locations of all protons are held on the surface of the atom this is the quantum effect that creates the uniform size... that's why we can only interact with atoms of the same size ... there are atoms of larger and smaller sizes we can only interact with their gravity 28:31
Isnt geometric quantization just the platonic solids?
How so?
@TheoriesofEverything because the platonic solids were hypothesized to be the shapes (geometry) of the smallest sub atomic particles (quantum). I guess I'm not as funny as I thought. 😅
everything links to the double slit
Algebraics, Geometry and Typology
Virtual Quantum Physics
...particle(one), string(many) and wave (infinite).... functions
...
Harmonics
Heuristics
Hierarchics
and
Human Hemispherics
....
I have always found this material so hard to follow. It's in so many places, both in math and physics going by many names.
Googles willow quantum chip is creating quantum geometry. I was bourne into this world, I was educated in this world, I worked with homo sapiens in this world, by force I comply with this world.
Hi, super interesting, if I understand Tjarda Boekholt solve 3 body problem...
I’d love a conversation between her and John Vervaeke.
😃
Geometricizing the Quantum LFG! ^.^
One thing - an exact position in Heisenbergian terms is never posible since during the time of measurement everything moves! A measurement without duration is impossible! By the way, do you see time as quantized? This video is very much to the point and important! Carry on!
Has the captioning been created manually? If not, the YT automated captions are very much improved, and catch some words I could not.
I transcribe every video. It's not UA-cam's automation
@@TheoriesofEverything Suspected as much. Your efforts are appreciated!
I would like to make a version of this video with interjections by an AI avatar of David Hestenes using Geometric Algebra, Geometric Calculus and his papers on Real Quantum Mechanics and Gauge Theory Gravity.
The biggest thing we can ever discover is a way to detangle entangle particles. When we do we will basically become Gods or destroy everything 😂
I believe no one can explain this stuff in layman's terms.
Oh there’s a post credits scene.
Everybody is strong in fantasy physics
100%. Dunning-Kruger Effect to the max.
😂😂
of all the hard sciences..
only one fantasizes
Its all fantasy anyways or what us humans explain this vast Universe
Peupsecks 😈
@7:00 one of the problems here is in conceiving of classical reality as different in ontology. But it is not. What we measure classically is quantum mechanical. The "procedure" of "quantization" is not switching on a new ontology, it is moving to a _different framework of analysis,_ one that allows for entanglement. The spinor (all wavefunctions for fermions) is classical geometry, a dilation and rotation/boost instruction. When you write down an entangled transformation you are admitting classical mechanics is not exact and indivisible stochastic processes have to be accounted for.
All the things that are real are real classically, and they are also quantum mechanical. The distinction is your frame of analysis, not Nature.
i dont think this has to do with analytics as much as you give it credit
Great
Thanks 😃
Honestly, I spent my life around Spanish speaking people and it was extremely difficult to follow what she is saying. I could not tell you if it was good mathematics or sophistry. I would need to take the entire video and transliterate it into English.
you invited questions going beyond this (very interesting) talk :
how do the following play into particle physics :
n-body problem
Gödel's theorems
Cauchy's residue theorem
Chris
Guys I think I have a physical system that can mimic a computer.. on my desk.
I can't stop looking at the ducks on the right.
That comes in the next video! It is a spoiler.
They will show up in the Navier-Stokes episode.
This is more about symmetry
Integrable Systems: A Structured Explanation
Core Definition:
A classical integrable system on a 2n-dimensional phase space (symplectic manifold) possesses n independent, Poisson-commuting conserved quantities (first integrals). These functions
f
1
,
f
2
,
…
,
f
n
f
1
,f
2
,…,f
n
satisfy:
{
f
i
,
f
j
}
PB
=
0
for all
i
,
j
,
{f
i
,f
j
}
PB
=0for all i,j,
where
{
⋅
,
⋅
}
PB
{⋅,⋅}
PB
is the Poisson bracket.
Arnold-Liouville Theorem:
If these functions are non-degenerate (their differentials are linearly independent), the system’s motion is confined to invariant tori (Liouville tori). Locally, the phase space splits into a fibration of these tori.
In action-angle coordinates, the symplectic form becomes:
ω
=
∑
i
=
1
n
d
I
i
∧
d
θ
i
,
ω=
i=1
∑
n
dI
i
∧dθ
i
,
where
I
i
I
i
(actions) are conserved, and
θ
i
θ
i
(angles) evolve linearly in time.
Geometric Interpretation:
The conserved quantities generate a torus action (symmetry) on the phase space. Dynamics reduce to quasi-periodic motion on these tori, making solutions explicit.
Example: The 2D harmonic oscillator has two commuting integrals (energy and angular momentum), leading to motion on a 2-torus.
Contrast with Non-Integrable Systems:
Systems like the three-body problem lack enough conserved quantities, leading to chaotic motion. Integrability is rare and often requires specific symmetries.
Role in Quantization:
Integrable systems provide natural action-angle variables for geometric quantization. The Bohr-Sommerfeld condition selects quantized tori:
∮
I
i
d
θ
i
=
2
π
ℏ
(
n
i
+
corrections
)
,
∮I
i
dθ
i
=2πℏ(n
i
+corrections),
linking classical conserved quantities to quantum numbers.
Key Takeaway: Integrable systems are "solvable" due to sufficient symmetries (conserved quantities), enabling reduction to invariant tori. This structure bridges classical and quantum mechanics, guiding quantization through geometric methods.
12:40
Obviously, the original quantum theory is discrete*, however, modern interpretation of the "smeared".**
----------------
*) - A.
0.Planck's theory of energy quanta.
1.The photo effect by Einstein (a photon has energy).
2.The Compton effect (a photon has a momentum).
3.The Rutherford-Bohr model.
4.De Broglie's hypothesis.
5.Finally:"Quantum theory is not the same radical theory as RT." (Einstein).
B.So cleverly arranged.
0.By solving the Schrodinger equation for a free particle, it is possible to obtain a complete state function, which is a plane monochromatic wave and coincides with the de Broglie wave.
1.This coincidence, of course, is not accidental, since the de Broglie hypothesis was used from the very beginning in the development of quantum mechanics, which received reliable experimental confirmation.
2.But the normalization condition is not fulfilled for the wave function: physically, this is due to the fact that absolutely free particles do not exist in nature, however, mathematically it is easier to apply this function in quantum theory.Why?
3.It should always be remembered that the wave function is a mathematical object and "it" cannot be found even experimentally by direct measurement (arbitrariness in the phase multiplier does not lead to the observed effects, since in this theory it is convenient to talk about the position of a microparticle only in space).
4.Thus, all the successes of quantum theory lie in the manipulation of facts and interpretation:
5.The de Broglie wave "suddenly" coincides with the fundamentally unobservable "?", and gives real answers to experimental questions thanks to de Broglie,
6.And applause to Born or Everett (... and others). Bravo!
7.But the age-old encore game is exhausting.
**) - The de Broglie hypothesis says nothing about the nature of "waves of matter"; de Broglie waves cannot be considered as waves in some material medium. Their physical meaning has yet to be clarified. And physicists expressed the incomprehensible in an even more vague way: waves of probability or their branching.
“I have an equation, do you have one as well” Prof, as with Dirac, could ask us the same question. 😅. Brilliant mathematician and lecturer ! Wow …. She mentioned “the art of war” by Sun Tzu ! Conflict from the interpersonal to international …. Supposed irreconcilability of classic and quantum worlds and their peaceful reconciliation. On point ! Thank you Curt !
Feynman later should have quipped "I have a diagram, do you?"
@@TheoriesofEverything. Love it ! 😅
X,2x+5=8
Geometrics I figured out is the door to the next dimension, it's the lock, and the tumblers must line up for Each dimension, 🗝️🔑🔒🔼▶️🔽⚠️🎶⚕️
Can anyone summarize what she said. I’m half an hour in and have only gotten that the universe is a particle/wave duality.
42
See EKB method. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%E2%80%93Brillouin%E2%80%93Keller_method
Watching it but wowza her choice of lighting with those eyewear makes for *constant* effort to ignore the spectacle(s?!).
I fell asleep listening to this and it got into my dream had a really disturbing nightmare.
@@tracik1277 thanks for the heads up. I was just about to fall asleep to this and I know what you mean - some discussions get into your dreams when you fall asleep listening, and it's not always good
I’m expecting Penrose to pick up from her description of the Hopf Fibration to then talk about his Twistor theory in an effort to marry GR & QM, no?
Constant flux speed = non-normalized GR backdrop volume length. Planck flux speed = constant flux speed divided by loop density. Relativistic Planck length = Planck flux speed divided by (flux speed constant + vortex axis positional movement velocity). Flux Tubes and Length Contraction do to rotational angular frequency: Flux tubes with starting circumference ℎ and starting radius ℏ experience length contraction as they move with angular frequency * distance from rotational axis. This contraction is proportional to the growth of mass and the curvature of the vortex field. As Planck flux speed takes a longer path before completing a full circle, Planck time dilates, leading to a conversion of Planck force into a different form of work, resulting in Planck force differential gravity. Planck Length Gradient: Beyond the angular frequency radius, Planck length contraction occurs, while reversing the gravity field within that radius. The central axis likely has a larger flux tube, with weaker, length-contracted flux tube filaments radiating from its poles. These filaments break and reform constantly due to higher positional movement velocity, while the central flux tube remains relatively intact. Planck Flux speed contraction from Feedback Loops of flux speed constant (the appearance of inflation): Planck flux is constantly forming feedback loops of flux speed constant, slowing Planck flux down universally, shortening Planck lengths while forming more (when Planck flux speed slows down, longer lengths break down, do to less relative push, allowing them to be perturbed and bifurcate till length and speed reach equilibrium [enough feedback loops of constant flux speed to curve Planck flux, but not so much to cause destabilizing wobbles, therefore as Planck flux decreases, the Planck length follows, and forms more Planck vortices to move through]). The Planck length gradient moves with the planet, solar system, star clusters, and galaxy, dragging the Planck field and causing the Planck force differential (gravity), because Relativistic Planck length = (Planck flux speed) divided by (flux speed constant + vortex axis positional movement velocity). This explains gravity, the weakening of Planck force as the vortices move causing distribution of Planck force, and the equivalence of special relativistic length contraction and general relativity within the non-normalized GR backdrop volume as the vortices are moving within that volume. Dark matter, dark energy is caused by lesser special relativistic positional movements of Planck vortices, they have shorter Planck time and longer relativistic Planck length. This unites quantum mechanics and general relativity, and provides firm and accurate foundation for energy conservation. The photon energy is described as a spherical wave (or curved egg-shaped wave near a black hole), which passes through Planck vortices as a spin reorientation. The banding of the wave is determined by the local convergence of Planck spin phase, amplitude, polarization, and direction of a cascade, which affects the probability of detecting photon momentum, even though the energy is there. The photon energy is a spherical wave (or curved egg-shaped wave evolution near a black hole), which passes through Planck vortices as a angular axis spin reorientation. Banding of the Wave: The banding of the wave is determined by the local convergence of reorientation frequency, phase [reorientation rotated direction], amplitude [number of neighbors], and polarization [reorientation rotation direction], and direction of the cascade, which affects the probability of detecting photon momentum. Converging Photon Energy: The momentum = converging photon energy is given by the formula: Converging photon energy = Planck angular momentum vortex spin axis reorientation frequency × same reorientation phase × same reorientation polarization × number of neighbors activated × same travel direction. When these angular and linear drive factors are aligned and cascading together in the same direction through the Planck field, they create a concerted push rather than counteracting each other. This is not the Planck angular momentum itself, but rather the change in its spin axis, which is communicated by the Planck flux angular momentum, which cascades to other Planck units within the Planck field. As you can see, it's very simple, the wave isn't fundamental, it is requiring the angular quanta to transmit it to other angular quanta, and general relativity is special relativity acting on Planck vortices within GR backdrop space (not meter space, which is not fundamental energy conservation).
Whats this got to do with me walking to dovey knights County store when i was 8 years old to get 6 pack bottles of coke. If i had my bottles. 1953. Dirt road
What's up with everyone posting their pet theories in the comments 😂
I have a grand unifying theory of nothing. Unfortunately the space in this comment section is too limited to contain it.
AMAZING
what a woman my wife is not like her.
0:29 I legit anticipated hearing the GMM theme here wtf is wrong with me
Basecally she said I don't know but I computed a lot of abstractions about it.
VIDEO 34 Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. THE MISSING SECRET OF LIGHT PART 1 - ua-cam.com/video/vBKZOl_dRlQ/v-deo.html
VIDEO 35 Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. THE MISSING SECRET OF LIGHT PART 2 - ua-cam.com/video/CUMP6-Gos2I/v-deo.html
Fremen Reverend Mother at ToE. This is definitely something I was not expecting. Shai Hulud be praised!
n^^n,x+0+1[^]=+1
The missing link hasn’t been discovered
What even does that mean?
40:16 its not evolution that shaped the area but the actual movements of the dust. Evolution is too realistic but only name and a taker.
Physicans do mathic
Music. God is singing, and that has brought into existence the fields within which we play.
This idea of a simulation....it seems a bit presumptuous. It's seems far more likely to me that our computers reflect underlying codes and structures that exist in the universe, rather than the other way around. I think this position that since, for example, error codes have been discovered in supersymmetry equations, there must be aliens, or our future selves (somehow) behind the simulation, is an reflexive response motivated by our desire to protect our current ontological model. Long story short; these codes, DNA included, imply some type of creator, or at least something akin to panpsychism. Im not sure I understand why this poses such a problem for people. Tremendous evidence in favor of some sort of field based intelligence has oversight over evolutionary process, etc; consciousness emerging at the quantum level, non neural cognition, respnse driven adaptations in mammals, reptiles, and trees, are a few good examples.
Are there any physically significant finite-dimensional systems that have not yet been quantized?
Of course she knows how space folds- she has the Eyes of Ibad.
I think Basil Hiley (close collegue of the great late David Bohm) who has been doing this before she was born, has a better deterministic geometric quantization for QFT including gravity and the non locality of entanglement with the quantum potential using quaternions, nilpotents, twistors, the Einstein 4-vector and Heisenberg position momentum approach instead of a wave function.
ua-cam.com/video/JhXLInpiEE0/v-deo.htmlsi=-TmZ3nLeQFhbSYnf
I am following this semi-classical explication. But it is missing some contextualization. Consider the coupled harmonic oscillator, such a fruitful model, tori result because the coupling between the oscillators is negligible, integrable. If the coupling is it is separable into modes, renormalizable, as long as the fiber bundle flow is subcritical. If the coupling is strong, you have non-renormalization, turbulent flow of your fiber bundles. Computationally this the difference between a halting process, non halting process, or a critical zone (see Collatz) where we can't prove it is halting or not by class (computing a Normal transcendental but not a Chaitin's constant).