FW-190 A8 Vs Massive B-17 Flying Fortress + P-47 Escort | Digital Combat Simulator | DCS | WWII |

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 638

  • @GrowlingSidewinder
    @GrowlingSidewinder  Місяць тому +34

    Check out the Merch Store: growling-sidewinder.creator-spring.com/
    Apex Gaming PC: apexgamingpcs.com/products/growling-sidewinder
    Thank you guys for watching and if you have any ideas for future videos please put them in the comment section below and they might just end up in the pipeline, thanks again, much Love.

    • @inquisitorbacon8170
      @inquisitorbacon8170 Місяць тому +3

      What about playing the role of bomber escort in a mustang?

    • @joselynalicemay6225
      @joselynalicemay6225 Місяць тому +2

      Maybe doing this again but at night this time with a few more escorts and bombers more of a challenge

    • @wanderer98716
      @wanderer98716 Місяць тому +2

      @@inquisitorbacon8170 A good suggestion

    • @travisdavis5182
      @travisdavis5182 Місяць тому +3

      You should try the head on pass the Luftwaffe was famous for early on. It would be interesting to see the closing speeds in this way!

    • @OK-GV888OD
      @OK-GV888OD 29 днів тому

      😎😎😎

  • @alphadelta3964
    @alphadelta3964 Місяць тому +1109

    If you keep these WW2 videos coming, my wife is going to start questioning why I’m smiling at my phone so much recently

  • @BarefootStrider
    @BarefootStrider Місяць тому +594

    Based on some of the books I've read, I feel like the amount of machine gun fire coming from the B-17s is woefully inadequate in this simulation. German fighters were known to do head-on attacks to minimize their exposure to return fire, not to creep up relatively slowly from behind. Regardless, I enjoy your content.
    I would love to see a video with the B-17's return fire 10x thicker and GS doing aggressive head-on passes with mere feet of separation as he bolts past. Also, if I'm not mistaken, the P-47s would be flying higher than the bombers so they could dive on any German fighters attempting this strategy.

    • @DonVigaDeFierro
      @DonVigaDeFierro Місяць тому +60

      Makes sense, but how much of that was just their doctrine? I remember reading that German pilots didn't waste time on dogfights, they used to approach, attack and then break contact. At least that's how Erich Hartmann did it.

    • @interestedguy8962
      @interestedguy8962 Місяць тому +79

      I agree, this was too easy for the FW190. Also, the escort normally fly above the bomber, gently weaving back and forth ready to pounce with the diving fighters. I think you should have been shredded attack from the rear. What can you do to make the bombers more aggressive with their shooting, and make the escorts more aggressively chase you.

    • @brucehearn2621
      @brucehearn2621 Місяць тому +45

      Re Allied fighter cover: yes, they flew above the bomber stream. The mission appears to be set in the winter of ‘44-‘45, so by then the fighters would often range ahead of the bombers to prevent packs of Luftwaffe aircraft from forming up and making mass head-on attacks.
      The bombers did not appear to have proper boxes set up. Not particularly effect but it did make things more "interesting" for attacking fighters.

    • @vazgeraldes
      @vazgeraldes Місяць тому +42

      Agree, low-tail position were no-nos, as they increased fighter exposure to the B-17 box defensive fire. Historically, German pilots preferred a high-tail approach or, better yet, a frontal attack, which limited exposure to bomber defensive fire. See a more nouanced reply below.

    • @Ambaryerno
      @Ambaryerno Місяць тому +42

      This also isn't a proper bomber box. The high and low formations are missing, so you don't have the proper coverage.
      You also wouldn't have flak firing once the interceptors went in because of the risk of friendly fire.

  • @manny2ndamendment246
    @manny2ndamendment246 Місяць тому +223

    WWII series is refreshing to watch

  • @daveriddell3704
    @daveriddell3704 Місяць тому +65

    That bomber pilot had nerves of steel! Showed absolutely no emotions! :)

  • @danwilliams5867
    @danwilliams5867 Місяць тому +206

    My great uncle who was B24 pilot had a very unlucky day. After he released his bomb load a AAA shell burst in the middle of the plane in open bomb bay doors. Only 3 people survived, he wasn't one. He was just 25

    • @truthseeker9454
      @truthseeker9454 Місяць тому +11

      Did you learn what happened through one of the survivors, or an eyewitness?

    • @STS-Dreamer
      @STS-Dreamer Місяць тому +17

      RIP to your great uncle 🫡

    • @horusfalcon
      @horusfalcon Місяць тому +10

      A valiant sky warrior! May he rest in eternal peace!

    • @zryuuuwu2.038
      @zryuuuwu2.038 Місяць тому +8

      @@truthseeker9454 if there were 3 survivors they made it back and report it so that may be it

    • @roberttaylor6108
      @roberttaylor6108 Місяць тому +2

      So his co pilot survived or he survived long enough to land the plane or the plane was disabled and only 3 managed to bail out and survive?
      What was his planes name if it had one?

  • @tedf7843
    @tedf7843 Місяць тому +140

    Head on attacks were the normal tactic if you read the german pilots documents. Limits exposure to return fire also the reason the B17G got a chin turret.

    • @AARONANKRUM
      @AARONANKRUM Місяць тому +14

      And diving passes straight through the formations to minimize their exposure.

    • @blazinrounds230
      @blazinrounds230 29 днів тому +1

      Yea they were typically aiming for the flight deck and navigation decks.

  • @StuartKoehl
    @StuartKoehl Місяць тому +61

    Best tactic would be a head-on approach from twelve o'clock, and slightly high. Approach the lead bomber box, open fire on the lead bomber from about 400 yards out, then pass through formation, split-S and dive away on a reciprocal heading, recovering out in front of the bomber formation. Climb back to altitude, then roll back in for a second attack.
    Remember, though, that the A-series BMW 801 radial loses power rapidly above 20,000 feet, which is why dealing with the escorts was usually reserved for the Bf.109s.

  • @esteban20969564
    @esteban20969564 Місяць тому +88

    the P-47s took a smoke break while you were cooking those bombers XD

    • @Schnittertm1
      @Schnittertm1 Місяць тому +13

      They took a smoke break with all the other FW-190's in the area.

    • @sidtedtilley
      @sidtedtilley Місяць тому +1

      I wondered where they were too!!

    • @samuelzuleger5134
      @samuelzuleger5134 Місяць тому +11

      Also, historically, the escorts would peel away during flak. However, that is because interceptors wouldn't attack then either.

    • @thiemokellner1893
      @thiemokellner1893 Місяць тому

      @@Schnittertm1 Playing cards with each other. Much healthier, they reckoned.😅

  • @braydenlovetere4545
    @braydenlovetere4545 Місяць тому +80

    This is where the fun begins

  • @josephengel1
    @josephengel1 Місяць тому +47

    My grandfather was a ball turret gunner. I’m so lucky to be alive today because he somehow survived.

    • @Ambaryerno
      @Ambaryerno Місяць тому +3

      Paradoxically, the ball turret gunners had less chance of being killed or wounded by enemy fire. The turrets were well-protected, and also just plain hard to hit. It was only if the plane that was actually going down that the survival rate plummeted.

    • @vornamenachname989
      @vornamenachname989 Місяць тому +2

      ​@@AmbaryernoBut didn't the Ball turret gunner have the worst survival rate? Or was that only during a crash? I know that the tail gunner has the highest chance of being shredded by enemy fire, so much that some crew members didn't want to get to know their tail gunners because then they would care less when they died. I think I heard that they would sometimes just hose down the interior of the tail gunner's post to get his remains out. But what was the difference between death by enemy fire and planes crashing? Did they really make that distinction?

    • @Ambaryerno
      @Ambaryerno Місяць тому +3

      @@vornamenachname989 If the plane was shot down, yes, the survival rate of the ball turret gunners was extremely low because of the difficulties of escaping the turret. However the turret gunners were less likely to be wounded or killed by enemy fire in the planes that made it back to base.

  • @CodyWilliams-z9v
    @CodyWilliams-z9v 29 днів тому +11

    Hey I really like your stuff dude, I’m a U.S. Marine serviced in the Infantry Iraq, Africa… I also hold Bachelor’s degree in History. I like to watch you work you’ve got good sound tactics and your always trying to expand your knowledge base, I really liked this video best B - 17 video I’ve seen I’d like to see more of this but with different tactics and some head on attacks thanks brother. You do great work on your Chanel.

    • @GrowlingSidewinder
      @GrowlingSidewinder  29 днів тому +6

      wow dude thank you very much, extremely generous of you. I appraise your feedback man, I really enjoyed that mission myself so I deff plan to do more in the future like it, including maybe 1 defending the bombers....(might be working on that as we speak) lol. Anyway thanks again brother I appreciate you. much love.

    • @CodyWilliams-z9v
      @CodyWilliams-z9v 28 днів тому +3

      ​@@GrowlingSidewinder Hey brother thank you, You really do put out great stuff. The next time you ATTACK a formation of B-17 bomber with a FW 190 give me a shout out on your Chanel, my call sign is ( REAPER 6 )... I think your the best DCS Pilot on UA-cam No bullshit dude keep cranking them out

    • @GrowlingSidewinder
      @GrowlingSidewinder  28 днів тому +3

      Thank you man, very kind of you.

  • @FreedomIsNotFree2023
    @FreedomIsNotFree2023 Місяць тому +17

    This was basically a Master's of Air scenario, those guys had enormous balls to fly these missions. The amount of losses that were considered acceptable, is hard to even comprehend.

    • @firebald2915
      @firebald2915 Місяць тому +2

      Many crew members suffered from shell shock, PTSD. 25 missions and out. 25? It's a wonderful anyone made it to 5 missions. The early missions were the worst because the fighters were instructed not to fight ahead of the bombers until Gabby Grabeski and Doolittle said, kill'em all ahead before they formed up to attack the B17's.

    • @lukesmith1003
      @lukesmith1003 День тому

      The fact that they actually believed this would be sustainable amazes me…
      Imagine trying to hit one of the FW190s with a .50 BMG, it’s insane that they even shot any of the German pilots down.

  • @papadanku2692
    @papadanku2692 Місяць тому +16

    the Butcher bird living up to its name 🙏

  • @Universal_exports87
    @Universal_exports87 Місяць тому +9

    Nice to watch WWII, especially showing the other side via the Luftwaffe mission.

  • @M4xPower
    @M4xPower Місяць тому +17

    The nickname of the FW-190 was Wurger, which translates to Shrike, which is a small carnivorous bird. They're also known as 'Butcherbirds' because they this weird behaviour of impaling animals they kill on thorns and spiny plants... like hanging meat in a meat locker. They also might use man-made spikes like barbed wire fences to hang little animals and birds off of. That's where the FW-190's 'butcherbird' name comes from.

    • @whosjulez1157
      @whosjulez1157 27 днів тому

      Also, "würgen" means to choke/strangle.

    • @M4xPower
      @M4xPower 27 днів тому

      @@whosjulez1157 Yeah Wurger can also mean 'strangler'. I don' t think that context was intended though. Also butchering is not strangling so it's likely not related to the English nickname either.

  • @13christbane
    @13christbane Місяць тому +19

    that first approach should have shredded you coming in from behind like that.

  • @792slayer
    @792slayer Місяць тому +10

    I love WW2 fighters. Mostly Allied aircraft, but the 190 is one of my favorites.

    • @oliviertostevin2144
      @oliviertostevin2144 Місяць тому +1

      What’s your favorite? Personally I might have to go with the f4u corsair but the p51 and spitfire and tied for a very close 2nd place.
      The Corsair’s with 4 20mm guns are cray, and a Corsair shot down a mig pilot in Korea. The corsairs gotta be one of the most successful prop airplanes in history.

    • @792slayer
      @792slayer Місяць тому

      @oliviertostevin2144 I love the Corsair and Mustang, but I would have to give the top slot for the U.S. to the Bearcat and the P-38. For the British, that goes to the Fury and the Tempest. I know they didn't do as much as the Spitfire, Hurricane, or the Beaufighter, but they're just so damn cool. On the German side, the 190 gets my top slot. It's proportioned nicely, and when you get into the engineering, it's really well thought out. Second place would probably go to the Bf-110. I got a thing for twin engine, twin tail designs.

  • @PaulMcElligott
    @PaulMcElligott Місяць тому +63

    Typically, the Luftwaffe fighters would break off their attacks once the bombers reached the flak guns.

    • @truthseeker9454
      @truthseeker9454 Місяць тому +8

      Yeah, I think he let the flak fire and flew through it for added suspense. 😁

    • @srellison561
      @srellison561 Місяць тому +2

      Yeah, the intercept was usually way before they got into flak range.

  • @rmp5s
    @rmp5s Місяць тому +7

    All those guys in those bombers?...absolute legends. I don't know how they put their pants on with such giant stones.

  • @cavemandelta
    @cavemandelta Місяць тому +5

    As a sucker for anything WW2, can you do more of these? I just really liked it, no other reason. Keep up the good work, and for anyone else who's reading this, remember you absolutely matter and make sure to have an AMAZING day!

  • @kylestickley8096
    @kylestickley8096 Місяць тому +4

    The brits called the fw the Butcher Bird, when it got on the frontline it was a huge problem for the Spit Mk 5.

  • @user-ug7fk2js2x
    @user-ug7fk2js2x Місяць тому +26

    The amount of return fire from the bombers is laughably low.

  • @ianbanks3016
    @ianbanks3016 Місяць тому +6

    I think there's clearly issue here with the gunners, the ball turret and rear gunners seemed to be asleep. There's not much of a challenge when no-one's firing back.

  • @Jasperdog3329
    @Jasperdog3329 Місяць тому +6

    GS, try head-on attacks. That was the preferred Luftwaffe tactic as it minimized a fighter's exposure time and US bombers had less firepower to the front until the G-model B-17 was introduced.

  • @viniciussoares3806
    @viniciussoares3806 Місяць тому +77

    Ball turret and rear gunners should have ripped you appart in those shallow aproaches. Great video tho, keep bringing w2 stuff

    • @srellison561
      @srellison561 Місяць тому +4

      Not to mention the waist gunners on the B-17s to the sides.

    • @gunnarbodowiemann7677
      @gunnarbodowiemann7677 Місяць тому

      That weren't sniper guns. This was more "let's pump the sky full with lead and see if we hit something".

    • @5co756
      @5co756 Місяць тому +1

      If he passes with 150kph higher speed than the bombers , it's just a second and he is gone . Also those Minengeschoss have a lot of shrapnel , there are a lot of WW2 gun films were they attack from behind . And there is almost no return fire from the bomber , it's probably not very comfortable for this ball gunners when 20mm Minengeschoss hit your bomber .

  • @BillGernert
    @BillGernert Місяць тому +5

    Really shows how brave those B17 crews were!

  • @thecodphein467
    @thecodphein467 Місяць тому +2

    I wish these WW2 videos would last but I know there’s only so many scenarios with the few aircraft we have at the time. I’m grateful that you brought WW2 back into the light!

  • @billyyayss
    @billyyayss Місяць тому +3

    This is so awesome. It’s way more chaotic than the jets.

  • @aaronliddell4280
    @aaronliddell4280 Місяць тому +10

    This just such a nice change from the previous content. Much appreciated 👍 P38 in the future please and thank you! 🙏

  • @josephfenech9401
    @josephfenech9401 26 днів тому +3

    4:14 Bro, you lit two bombers on fire in one pass!!

  • @panzersevennine3635
    @panzersevennine3635 Місяць тому +4

    Outstanding vid - as always. Quick thought - pretty sure the Luftwaffe deconflicted fighter interception and flak support. In other words they took turns based on airspace covered by the encroaching bombers. Just like the airspace deconfliction that we do today for air-to-ground and ground-to-ground weapons delivery. Whatever the the case, keep the WWII vids coming!

  • @44lucas
    @44lucas Місяць тому +8

    Oh boy oh boy, another vid with Warbirds, yay!!!!

  • @amkessel2014
    @amkessel2014 Місяць тому +1

    YES PLEASE to more of this kind of content! Large formations of WW2 heavies is criminally undersupported in DCS and IL-2 GB

  • @duaneedwards5439
    @duaneedwards5439 Місяць тому +3

    Fantastic video, but I agree with some others, not enough fire from the bombers, and not in proper formations. Also where were the P-47's in all this? The certainly would have been coming after the attacking fighters. Love the WWII action, I could watch it all day! A million thanks!!!

  • @Riccardo_Silva
    @Riccardo_Silva Місяць тому +3

    These WW2 combats are GREAT!!! Well done GS!!

  • @cheekclappin96ss22
    @cheekclappin96ss22 Місяць тому +1

    So much respect is due to the bomber crews of ww2. What an absolutely helpless feeling they must have had on every mission. True heroes

  • @kevw25
    @kevw25 Місяць тому +2

    The absolute brass balls on those bomber pilots to just have to stay on course and trust the escorts and gunners. God bless them.

  • @worldbreaker1023
    @worldbreaker1023 Місяць тому +2

    This was different. Well done! Never had that perspective before. Time on target in minimal.

  • @rays.5764
    @rays.5764 Місяць тому +3

    Yuuuuuuusssssssssss!!!!!! More bomber runs!!! Those were my favorite missions in IL-2. This is why I watch this channel. 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

  • @thecellafella
    @thecellafella Місяць тому +2

    Always down to watch F-22 vids, but I really, REALLY dig this dive into the oldies!

  • @ivanstepanovic1327
    @ivanstepanovic1327 Місяць тому +22

    B-17s had machineguns covering all of its sides. So in the beginning the German tactics was to fly inside the formation and fire from within it. That way, there would be no defensive fire from B-17s out of fear that they might hit each other. When the Americans got fighters that could escort the bombers, Germans switched to attacking from high speed dives, but would still try to stay inside the formation if possible.

    • @Hardcaslte
      @Hardcaslte Місяць тому +3

      This is what I was thinking too. The absolute last place you'd want to be in a German plan would be behind the bombers where they have long periods of time to target you and fire back. You'd want to dive down or come at the from the front in quick fly by attempts to minimize the time spent in front of their guns, and also moving fast enough to be a hard target to hit.

  • @Mr_Lukasgrim
    @Mr_Lukasgrim Місяць тому +5

    Man, we really need Me-262 in DCS!

  • @horusfalcon
    @horusfalcon Місяць тому +6

    So... eine kleine Schrage-musik? Germans called the FW-190 "Wurger" (Shrike). The Shrike makes its nest amid very long thorns, and impales its prey for later consumption, hence the name "Butcher Bird".

  • @JLH111176
    @JLH111176 Місяць тому +2

    nerves of steel to stay in formation when planes around you are going down and you can't do anything

  • @mattgn39
    @mattgn39 Місяць тому +1

    Love the attention to detail with that collapsed wheel still merrily spinning away when the a/c comes to rest. Great vid. Yeah, the 17s took a hell of a kicking.

  • @97BuckeyeGuy
    @97BuckeyeGuy Місяць тому +6

    I love these WWII videos. I like the slower fights over the European theater.

    • @timbaskett6299
      @timbaskett6299 Місяць тому +1

      Kind of wish they had Pacific Theater missions as well. F4Fs, F6Fs, and F4Us would be nice. Not sure about the F2Bs, though. 😂

  • @curtisbartlett8170
    @curtisbartlett8170 Місяць тому +4

    Good mission. Didn't see any other 109's going in with you.

  • @darrellgrant7615
    @darrellgrant7615 Місяць тому +2

    My school mascot was a B-17. We were called the Flying Forts😊.

  • @warrencan4221
    @warrencan4221 Місяць тому +2

    would love to see this again, but with head on passes like how they used to attack bomber formations. From the rear the gunners have an easier time as we saw

  • @lazuvt9456
    @lazuvt9456 Місяць тому +7

    4:53 This is fine.

  • @jeffberkley4082
    @jeffberkley4082 Місяць тому

    I like to dive across the box perpendicular to their course, strafing several then keep looping forward - rinse repeat. It's not easy to time it. Coming from 6 o'clock is ill advised. Tail and belly guns both have a shot.

  • @DMRH69
    @DMRH69 Місяць тому +1

    Great work on those B-17's
    You move that FW190 like a pro

  • @JohnHill-qo3hb
    @JohnHill-qo3hb Місяць тому +2

    Love the B-17 pilot with the iPad in his lap... AAA would not be engaging the bombers if the fighters were attacking, AAA would engage over the target, Fighters engage before and after the bombs have dropped. And, the bombers would be in a box formation, not line abreast, the box formation allows mutual defense. Good video though.

    • @Existentialcrisis_1488
      @Existentialcrisis_1488 Місяць тому

      Glad someone else understands this lol

    • @Ambaryerno
      @Ambaryerno Місяць тому

      Also, the escorts would sweep ahead of the bomber stream to prevent the fighters from even making contact.

  • @macgyver186
    @macgyver186 Місяць тому +1

    I've been waiting for this for a long time. You're the best GS!
    Would love to see this same mission with you in the Me262.

  • @YOUPIMatin123
    @YOUPIMatin123 Місяць тому +7

    Your first attack is textbook what you SHOUDNT do.
    Hit them vertical not from the rear.

    • @bhpictures
      @bhpictures Місяць тому +2

      Yes! In reality, those gunners in the turrets would torn him to shreds.

  • @legacychase3702
    @legacychase3702 Місяць тому +2

    Nice hunting! Kinda scary to think about in terms of the reality being simulated for both sides

  • @TurbineFlyer
    @TurbineFlyer Місяць тому

    One thing I love about the FW-190 is that it can take a beating. It's just an air cooled radial. So no coolant to leak out.

  • @robertbrodeur4326
    @robertbrodeur4326 Місяць тому +1

    I don't know if the A8 specifically can carry them, but some of those interceptors can use unguided rockets in addition to the guns. They would ripple fire the whole load into the formation first pass. Hopefully get some kills and certainly disrupt the heck out of the formation. It would be cool to see mission using those.

    • @timonsolus
      @timonsolus Місяць тому +1

      Those massive 50 mm rockets were very deadly - but also slow and very inaccurate.

  • @KillerKev1961
    @KillerKev1961 Місяць тому +1

    The bomber crews must have been terrified. Excellent sortie.

  • @01ZO6TT
    @01ZO6TT Місяць тому

    Really liking the WW2 content! I agree with some of the other post about the Germans making head on passes and shooting at the cockpit to kill pilots. Also about the B-17 gunners return fire being low. It seemed a bit to easy for the 190. Please keep the WW2 content coming. As always, awesome video.

  • @Bad_Wolf_Media
    @Bad_Wolf_Media Місяць тому

    The tactics for this run are well-established in Iron Maiden's "Aces High":
    "Move in to fire at the mainstream of bombers
    Let off a sharp burst and then turn away
    Roll over, spin 'round to come in behind them
    Move to their blindsides and firing again"

  • @Lurch4539
    @Lurch4539 Місяць тому

    I literally like and share every ww2 video here. This is awesome

  • @timbaskett6299
    @timbaskett6299 Місяць тому

    In museums I have seen BF-109s Me-262s, and Me-163s. But I have never gotten to see an FW-190 "Butcher Bird", yet.
    Two planes I wished they had in DCS are the P-40 and Hurricane.

  • @nigo467
    @nigo467 Місяць тому +1

    Like the Oldschool Dogfighting, wanna see more of that!!

  • @rowbags3017
    @rowbags3017 Місяць тому +3

    That was pretty amazing! More like it, please! 😎 The Fw 190 was actually nicknamed the Butcherbird (a type of songbird), rather than the Butcher - although the latter was definitely appropriate in this video! 😉

  • @Killflap
    @Killflap Місяць тому

    Great video! Thank you very much. I'm always impressed by the graphics.
    In my day, I was happy when the airplanes had animated weapons on their wings. Now you can see the zipper on the crew in the bomber. :-D

  • @floopygoober
    @floopygoober Місяць тому

    man yesterday i asked for this exact video and boy did you deliver. this is awesome

  • @JohnCallender
    @JohnCallender Місяць тому

    really enjoying the return to WWII content! thanks for creating and sharing it!

  • @jasonthompson4741
    @jasonthompson4741 Місяць тому

    This WW2 series has been Dope but that's no surprise all your content is Dope. Thank you Homie

  • @nightshiftgarage8824
    @nightshiftgarage8824 Місяць тому

    Thank you. We appreciate the video. You won a new subscriber!

  • @whylie74
    @whylie74 Місяць тому

    The Thunderbolts should be flying atleast 2000ft above the bomber formation and weaving from one side to the other, and the bomber formation is like that used by B 24s, and the 3 ship (not 4) elements should be staggered in hight.

  • @bqaquatics9727
    @bqaquatics9727 Місяць тому

    Love the massive ww2 plane fights keep it coming more big element runs

  • @altratronic
    @altratronic Місяць тому

    A high AOA pass (like a high-side pass) is a far better option compared to pulling up behind a large flight of B-17s, even if your speed is high.

  • @icaleinns6233
    @icaleinns6233 Місяць тому

    Looked like that landing was good enough! Well done.

  • @CrocodileBullet
    @CrocodileBullet Місяць тому

    The slaughterhouse in the air. And on the ground too.
    Very impressive Video, GS.
    It is great fun to watch your perfect made videos!
    Keep fighting and flying.
    WWII content is 👍🏻

  • @whatstheoptions
    @whatstheoptions Місяць тому

    It's so nice to see that 190 isn't draining energy unlike the last video. Thanks )

  • @16gauge90
    @16gauge90 Місяць тому

    After yesterday's video I thought how cool it would be to have one just like this!

  • @jsean13
    @jsean13 Місяць тому

    Cliffs of Dover with a Battle of Britain fight would be amazing

  • @DrBF3000
    @DrBF3000 Місяць тому +1

    I was one of the many who ask you for this. Thanks.

  • @lcdrpost
    @lcdrpost Місяць тому

    Fantastic video! I think this is one of the best videos that you have made. Very interesting! Thank you!

    • @13christbane
      @13christbane Місяць тому

      from a tactics perspective it was his worst.

  • @WoodsmanHobo777
    @WoodsmanHobo777 Місяць тому

    Love the WW2 missions. You the man GS.

  • @731trident
    @731trident Місяць тому

    This is a great watch! Nice to mix it up! I'd love to see a Battle of Britain version with Hurricanes attacking the Luftwaffe!

  • @Lairo76
    @Lairo76 13 днів тому

    14:10 looks like a painting, beautiful!

  • @CivisMilitarum
    @CivisMilitarum Місяць тому

    Dam, that was awesome! Now I want to see an A-10 down there taking out those flack guns. 😂

  • @davebartosh5
    @davebartosh5 29 днів тому

    My Uncle flew the B-17 back in WWII. He got the purple heart for flak hitting a fire extinguisher, and leaving metal in his leg. He went on to work for the JPL with NASA

  • @iron_talon
    @iron_talon Місяць тому +1

    So the nickname for the 190 was the Wuerger, which translates as Butcher-Bird, but in English is known as the Shrike. Still a pretty intimidating nickname given what those birds do, lol

  • @brittenmusic6923
    @brittenmusic6923 Місяць тому

    Would be great to see the B17's flying in their correct box formation next time. 😊

  • @matto9734
    @matto9734 Місяць тому

    Remember: there were 10 guys on each B-17 and the pilots had to stick to their course at all cost. These man were real heroes! This vid is really hard to watch in a way... good flying as always GS.
    Nevertheless the Kurt Tank FW-190 design was ingenious. He also went for the maximum pilot cover possible because you could replace a plane more easy than a skilled pilot.

  • @garys8754
    @garys8754 Місяць тому

    It wasn’t long before the air crews and mission planners learned to fly in box formation. This strategy allowed the gunners to provide fire support to other B-17s in their group and would allow them to maximize the number of 50 caliber MG’s to fire upon the incoming fighters. Even still the casualties were enormous with 10 crew members lost for every 17 that went down.

  • @TheMasterCheese
    @TheMasterCheese Місяць тому

    That was fun. Now let's see if you can protect the bombers.

  • @minli9958
    @minli9958 Місяць тому

    There are less one-shot kills in WWII series, it makes the combat more unpredictable and interesting.

  • @derekwright3239
    @derekwright3239 Місяць тому +1

    We need more battles like this please!!

  • @phoenix.308
    @phoenix.308 Місяць тому

    Huge Recommendation for the AppleTV Show "Masters of the Air" from makers of Band of Brothers. It portraits exactly the Stuff in this video pretty good. Being a Bomber Crew was pure Horror Back then. 😅

  • @QuiteSBR556
    @QuiteSBR556 Місяць тому

    LOVE THE WW2 videos/missions! Keep em coming

  • @glennvogt1194
    @glennvogt1194 Місяць тому

    They didn't call the Fw,190 the Bucher bird for nothing.
    Incredible machine.

  • @tonyennis1787
    @tonyennis1787 Місяць тому +1

    It takes about twenty 20mm shell hits to down a B-17. And something like 2 or 3 30mm shells. I think DCS is taking it easy on you here.

  • @roberttaylor6108
    @roberttaylor6108 Місяць тому

    Those contrails would blind tail gunners. So the ballturret was the only gun that could effectively see you and aim at you. Tail gunners firing arcs left some to be desired. And ball turrets were notoriously hard to control and aim.

  • @mikegreck2625
    @mikegreck2625 Місяць тому

    These mostly would be A8 Rammjager with extra armor on the cowl ring, windscreen, canopy and cockpit sides with any number of cannons of different variety. They were slow and sluggish with the added weight and high altitude, and as such were protected by Bf-109 G-K groups that performed much better at altitude. Attacks were head on, with a back roll and dive to avoid very heavy bomber box fire. Cool video.

  • @samiam5557
    @samiam5557 Місяць тому

    Man the flak was so thick you could dance on it!