Phono Cartridge Comparison Pickering XSV 3000 vs Shure V15 Type IV

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 17

  • @mikegarland9156
    @mikegarland9156 27 днів тому

    I bought the Pickering XSV 3000 ......it got excellent reviews in it's day and sounded the clearest.

  • @clarinista
    @clarinista 6 місяців тому +5

    Pickering...best sound...!!!

  • @Grimwriggler
    @Grimwriggler 6 місяців тому +4

    Pickering wins!

  • @Gigidag77
    @Gigidag77 2 місяці тому

    I have a shure V15 IV and both the standart "HE" stylus as well as the later "MR" stylus shure offered (both original, not a replacement). The MR is a VAST improvement in clarity to the HE. I bet it would smoke the Pickering.

  • @Trojan0304
    @Trojan0304 6 місяців тому +2

    Got a V-15 type 4 but no sylus so got a JICO SAS for replacement

    • @VinylComeback
      @VinylComeback 6 місяців тому

      Do you like it?

    • @Trojan0304
      @Trojan0304 6 місяців тому +1

      @@VinylComeback yes

    • @kkrobertson1
      @kkrobertson1 5 місяців тому

      @@Trojan0304 Have the same setup and will take the Pepsi challenge with any of these high quality over price cartridge :).

  • @timessquarerecordscom1469
    @timessquarerecordscom1469 6 місяців тому +2

    I remember back in the day the sure V 15 type five got one of the best reviews against megabuck cartridges and I said to myself I have that
    It was very inexpensive 🤔
    The review was in the absolute sound

    • @kkrobertson1
      @kkrobertson1 5 місяців тому

      Have the same cartridge with a JICO stylus. I will take the Pepsi challenge with any of these high end, over price cartridge :).

  • @VinylComeback
    @VinylComeback 6 місяців тому +1

    No doubt the Pickering has some extra "sparkle" because of its high frequency emphasis. I'd be happy with both, but if I could I'd get the Shure

  • @anatolygrishin4234
    @anatolygrishin4234 6 місяців тому

    Very difficult to hear any difference with this particular record, both sound great. I believe the XSV 3000 is moving iron, not moving magnet. Their proprietary differential electromagnetic system that allowed 35 dB channel separation (from 681/XV15 and on) uses magnetic reluctor attached to cantilever, and permanent magnet in cartridge body. I have taken apart XSV 3000 body and there was permanent magnet and 4 coils, as usual.

  • @gnappognagno6949
    @gnappognagno6949 5 місяців тому +3

    no way the pickering xsv 3000 could sound better than the v15 iv : the shure has more control, no colour , very flat response, lower distortion ...I had once the xsv 3000 but I sold it after 4 months... on the other hand , using the Shure v15 IV , you can play vinyl for hours and hours with no fatigue and listening micro and macro dynamic excursion very easy ....

  • @cazaresfamily007
    @cazaresfamily007 6 місяців тому +1

    Pickering wins shure sounds more like a tape would sound

  • @farquell5782
    @farquell5782 6 місяців тому +2

    The pickering highlights some instruments and sounds more raucous.
    But with the Shure I can hear for example that they are cellos accompanying the saxophone rather than a generic string instrument.
    The Shure gives the most balanced presentation. As usual very flat and honest.

    • @gsherlock
      @gsherlock 6 місяців тому +3

      Also at the beginning the xylophone is accompanied by brass, a horn I think. I can barely hear it on the Pickering, its much more present with the Shure. I think listeners are getting carried away with the extra top end whilst missing the bigger picture.

    • @farquell5782
      @farquell5782 5 місяців тому

      There is xylophone and flute doubling it at the beginning. The brass instruments are trombones. The only instrument that can make that slidey sound