Woman sues GEICO after getting STD in a Car??
Вставка
- Опубліковано 16 вер 2024
- GEICO STD Lawsuit Explained in less than 60 seconds! A woman and her partner hooked up in his car. He didn't tell her about his HPV diagnosis and she contracted the virus. So she sued...his car insurance??? Let me know what you think about this story! Subscribe to @LawByMike for more tips!
⭐ Become a member of THE INNER CIRCLE to get exclusive perks⭐
/ @lawbymike
⚖️ Questions? Issues? Contact Me: lawbymike.com
📲 OR TEXT 279-529-6453 (279-LAW-MIKE)
👾 Join My Discord Community: go.lawbymike.c...
📸 Instagram: go.lawbymike.co...
▶️ Subscribe To My UA-cam: go.lawbymike.co...
🎧 Podcasts: go.lawbymike.co...
🎵 TikTok: go.lawbymike.co...
📰 Need PR Help? Check Out Otter PR: go.lawbymike.c...
#car #geico #gecko #lizard #insurance #law #legal #lawsuit #arbitration #steamy #std #hpv #sexy #lawyer #lawbymike #repeatafterme #tiktok #youtubeshorts #cop #cops #lawyers #legal #attorney #lawschool #hacks #legal
DISCLAIMER (Of course, I'd have one 😁)
Hey, you might think that this info makes me your lawyer, but it doesn’t and I’m not. Sorry, but I AM NOT YOUR LAWYER unless we have an engagement agreement. I am just providing public information here, like a library does, and am not providing you with legal advice about your situation. So, it would be totally unreasonable for you to conclude we have an attorney-client relationship just because you're viewing this information.
So the guy’s car insurance covers STDs? That’s a good policy to have.
My guess is the arbitration had to decide if the language in the contract covered "accidents" and how "accident" is defined.
@@777Skeptic so she fucked him accidentally don't make sense
The woman suffered "bodily" injury. Which is covered in most car insurances.
@@nobodygood7493 that’s convoluted as hell
What next can I sue the bed company if I catch one on the bed?
Geico: Fifteen minutes later can save you more on HPV insurance
Nah wtf
15 minutes or more**
Update: In January 2023, the Missouri Supreme Court found fault with the lower court's reasoning and sent the case back down for additional proceedings. They held that Geico should have been allowed to intervene before the case was finalized.
Sounds like BS to me, if it had been the other way around, she couldn't have bribed the judge.
@@jerimiyahaligorh8792she may not have needed to bribe anyone.
People handling the case might have a bias against gecko independently from the womans case.
Further update, a Federal judge put this to rest in March 2023 by ruling that car sex does not constitute use of the vehicle for the purpose of the car insurance policy. Sanity prevailed.
@@ddebenedictis Goddayum, I'm glad something correct happened. I mean it's fucked the guy had an std and gave it to her and that does suck, but has nothing to do with the insurance agency.
@@ddebenedictiswhat kind of clown world is it that I’m happy an insurance policy didn’t pay out? 🤦♂️ This has to be the Matrix, right?
This is one of the most wild cases I've ever heard about. Wtf.
I’ll throw in the mandatory “only in America/the (Wacky) West” comment
As a person who lives in Missouri, I agree
America is a broken society. That woman should, literally, have been kicked out of court and been charged for wasting GEIKOs time.
Bro how did you edit that and still leave multiple errors?
I'm not a fan of Geico but them getting sued was messed up
it's their insurance policies that need reviewing if it says they're liable. Meaning they pay this round if they said they were liable for all bodily harm, but amend it to not include STD's.
Geico is a big corporation with many lawyers that have nothing better to do
There are so many legit insurance claims which do not get their fair share. Then there is this woman and her bs...
There's legit no way he censored a cartoon lizard's nipples.
Don’t forget his gecko shlong
😂
And the [REDACTED]
Oof u have 420 likes I can't like
Does it have nipples?
Man i need to sue the city for tripping over the sidewalk. 🤣🤣🤣
ON GAWDD
.... I wouldn't be surprised if you win with a good lawyer....
Actually thats the one case youll never win. City is almost never responsible
That’s happened before
I need to sue them for the sidewalk that sent me flying off my bike and face planting 😭
I don't understand how car insurance is responsible for any of this🤔
its not, they just want money.
@@trashpanda502Well it kinda is responsible. An insurance company has a duty to protect the people it insures from lawsuits to protect the insurance company's own assets. They are meant to step in to prevent the lawsuit from getting past the first stages because it would make no sense to them for an insured party to lose and then claim on the insurance to avoid the company paying out an unnecessarily high claim if the insured can't defend themselves effectively - it's better to stop the insured from a frivolous case than risk having to pay out. M.O (the woman in the M.O v Geiko case) gave Geiko notice to defend their interests before any court proceedings, but Geiko said they weren't going to pay her $1 million (completely understandable) however they didn't go to court to have the case dismissed. They just left it, and waited to intervene until after arbitration. The courts basically told them they had every opportunity to intervene before it got to the point they would have to pay, but they chose to do nothing until after it was settled. Whilst this obviously seems unjust that someone is getting a $5.2 million windfall for something like this, it was Geiko's responsibility to step in as soon as they were informed of the claim so they could put an end to it - they chose not to and it's very possible they'll have to pay
I think it was some silly clause in the Geico policy that said it covered this.
@@rossm4586i aint readin all that but i agree
Insurance is paid to cover any accidents or injuries so if someone gets hurt in the car the insurance company may be able to pay for damages
Can't believe no one explained this yet. In a nutshell, what happened was that she was forced to sue Geico to get compensation from the guy because the law in that state says that if you have insurance that is in any way related to your claim you have to sue them first no matter what - as a matter of formally establishing fault. Ie. you may not get any payout unless you sue all parties no matter how tangentially linked. For example, if you crashed your car because of faulty breaks due to a manufacturing mistake into a boat parked in a harbour, if you only sued the manufacturer, the manfucaturer's lawyers could counter your claim saying you didn't sue every party that could be 0.001% responsible, and the judge may rule in favour of the manufacturer if you fail to do so. In that same example, you would also sue the harbour, who would in turn sue their insurance. The insurance could just video call in the judge and say "we have nothing to do with this", and the judge would say "yeah that makes sense" and dismiss that lawsuit. Now, the manufacturer would not be able to weasel out of it because they're the last liable party left after the seller, the car repairshop, the harbour, the boat owner, the harbour's insurance company, and the boat owner's insurance company and you yourself. The idea of the law or the way that the system is set up is to be *more fair* by making sure as a matter of principle that every liable party gets sued and shares in its share of liability. Mind you I don't fully agree with the way the system is set up, but that's how it is set up.
Usually it'd get decided quickly but in this case Geico's lawyers were lazy and kind of just assumed it'll get thrown out no matter what and the arbiter ruled that since Geico's lawyers didn't even try and showed no interest in the case that he rules in favour of the woman by default, it's like if you didn't show up for your parking ticket courtroom hearing, you have to pay even if the parking ticket was wrong, because you didn't show up.
This *isn't* some winning lottery ticket for the woman, it's society making sure all companies and lawyers always follow the rules. Geico agreed to go by the arbiter's decision before the arbitration started, that's how arbitrations work. The solution to this supposed slight against Geico is to change the laws or Geico can just pay their lawyers better
All that Geico had to do, was to show up. If they hadn't written their arbitration clause this way, it'd be much easier for them to get this dismissed. However they wrote the arbitration clause to satisfy their other incentives, such that participating in this easily dismissed lawsuit would actually be difficult for them and their lawyers. In essence as it currently stands it's mostly Geico's fault. However, I am sure I would not want to live in such a society where ridiculous things like this are happening systematically.
Posting same comment again here so that people can see it ^
Oh that's interesting
@@123mickymouse123 except that it's mostly made up.
Geico wasn't allowed to participate in the arbitration because they didn't intervene during the initial suit against the man. The man and the woman agreed to arbitration then the man gave up everything in arbitration. The arbitrator deemed him liable and because he was insured by Geico, Geico was responsible to pay for it.
Then Geico was not allowed to intervene by the lower court and the appeals court. The Missouri Supreme Court ruled that Geico should have been allowed to intervene and threw out the award in January of 2023. In March of 2023, a federal court refused to hear the case.
appreciate the explanation.
thanks guys
@@leafster1337ur welcum guy
Meanwhile I'm over here waiting for All-State to respond for 10 months
I fail to see how this has anything to do with Geico
It doesn't but Geico screwed themselves over by not giving a proper defense
Bodily injury/accidents and the way the terms are defined and what it covers based on contract paperwork as interpreted by the arbitration and now the courts
@@ashyy_washyy I'm pretty sure going to arbitration cost less than going to court and insurance companies don't want to pay more than they have to
It doesn't, but it was a smart move because geico can give more cash
@@brandonfarris8532 This is a good point
How can home insurance refuse to help people who lost their home because they don’t cover *blank* events (ex: floods, earthquake, fire, hail, termites) but a car insurance is liable for you catching a disease? 😂
You're very close to realizing how related those two statements actually are...
Disclaimers, their clause on bodily injury of a passenger was probably loosely defined, in which case it is the courts or arbitrators job to interpret the definition.
Because one they defined it what would cover exactly and in the other they didn’t.
This is what the car insurance gets for trying to be nice
That's like sueing Verizon because you dropped your phone. There's absolutely no connection.
Then dont write a contract saying there is
@@thewhitefalcon8539 don’t think there is anything in Geico’s contract about stds…
Verizon doesn't insure your phone they just provide a service. Insurance is a wierd thing, because you are essentially paying for promises.
“There’s absolutely no connection” perfectly describes my experience with Verizon heyooo
Well if I had insurance on that phone through Verizon and they denied my claim I would sue too.
You left out that the man and woman agreed not to challenge the arbitrator regardless of the outcome. That is what put Geico in the box.
Geico needs some better lawyers
I fail to see how they can settle it in court when it's an already settled matter.
They signed the contract to enter binding arbitration.
The cost of breaking the arbitration agreement is probably worth less than $5 million.
Arbitration is an alternative dispute resolution, however, it doesn't mean court is ruled out. Its just things you can do before court in order to resolve the issue without paying fees for Lawyers, or paying the other fees attached
@Small Dan. Yep, plus you can go to court to challenge the decision reached at arbitration for a variety of reasons. One of which can be an abuse of discretion or another claim.
@@ryanvanlue7020 yeah. The only reason I know this is because I've studied law, which doesn't help the general public who are more likely to take disputes to court because they aren't aware of the other options. Especially since court doesn't always give the fairest result in some cases (e.g Custody), where as ADR is mainly used to have both parties agree on the end result
@@TheSmallDan same
so this is basically "I shot my husband in the foot, let's call the cops on the priest"
Who cares big companies make you sign away your right to take them to court and force you to use arbitration. It’s great when that blows up in their face.
@@Samifry …but this is also why all of our insurance rates keep going up, so they can pay absolutely stupid claims like this instead of just the real ones
@@PMTcommenter exactly
@@PMTcommenter you're right, people always like money, but never ask where it comes from, or who's paying it
@@Samifry Okay you pay my increased premiums to cover this lawsuit.
Who cares about your paycheck, not like it goes to anybody else but you after all.
And this, my friends, is why our insurance rates keep climbing
This is in the same vein with people looting stores and saying “who cares, they have insurance!” 🤦♀️ so stupid.
@@cybercop3108 dude, there are also millions of other cases like this
not really..look up their any insurances net profit for any fiscal year, its in the billions. thats after paying employees, claims, and any other expense..yet rates keep rising? same with walmart, they made 13 billion in net profit and smashed their net profit record in 2021. but they blame inflation? dont let corporate propaganda force you to blame your peers while they make an absurd amount of money
@@PMTcommenter
Don’t care, insurance companies are scum and deserve to lose every cent they can at any chance.
no, insurance is climbing because they want more money
Geico: We don't want to handle this. Let an arbitrator take care of it.
Arbitrator: I agree with the other person.
Geico: Wait... hang on...
People with common sense: wait… hang on…. (Who in their right mind would agree with her) ( people who don’t hate insurance companies yet soo less biased)
Geico: I wasn't able to properly defend myself
The court: "this whole operation was your idea"
They sent it to arbitration then appealed because they didn't get a chance to defend themselves in court.
Then why did they go the arbitration route in the first place?
GEICO makes all customer enter into a mandatory binding arbitration agreement. Greedy GEICO's own fault.
@@jacobp.2024They thought it'd go there way
@@jacobp.2024Because arbitration is set up to essentially be the companies' court, so going to arbitration was done in an effort to have it even more in their favour. That they got fucked over by it is the exception, not the rule, and why I don't have much sympathy for them since they were trying to do the legal fucking in the first case.
@@jacobp.2024 they didn't. They refused to cover because sex in your car is not the normal operation of the car so it is not covered.
The woman sued the man, Geico refused to cover, the man and woman went to an arbitrator, he admitted fault in everything and the arbitrator ruled that Geico had to pay. Without Geico being a party.
Geico then appealed to a court that refused to hear the case because they had the chance to defend themselves during the initial hearings if they had just covered the guy.
This case is already over by the way. Missouri Supreme Court overruled the lower courts and threw out the arbitrators award because oddly enough injuries from sex in the back of a car is not covered by car insurance because sex in the car is not the normal use of a car.
She appealed to the feds and they refused to hear the case in March.
What had Car Insurance to do with having sex in the car and getting STDs ????
I've listened to this like 2 times now but I still don't understand and this question keeps me asking.
Inquiring minds want to know...and so do I; ridiculous isn't it?
Little to nothing, but the company sent it to arbitration, and the decision was made not in their favour. You know how insurance companies will do everything they can to not pay you? Basically the arbitrator decided that the same kind of loopholes they usually operate around allowed her to successfully make this claim.
If you're still lost, I recommend looking into the corporate arbitration process.
@@Jared_Is_Near thank you I’ve been confused about this case for a while now but that cleared it up
America
I hope GEICO wins. This is ludicrous.
"I want compensation."
"We demand arbitration outside of court."
"The arbitration judged in my favor."
"BUT WE DIDN'T EVEN GO TO COURT???!!???"
Exactly this. Lol
It's amazing how easy it is to sue companies for no reason.
Woman: Willingly has sex, just happens they both agreed the location to be in a car.
Sues a car insurance company to cover her own decisions and his personal negligence.
Did she sue the owner of the parking lot too? I don’t see what the insurance company has to do with anything. The girl and guy made a mistake and just need to be accountable.
Buzzkill
wait till you here how women want license to kill just because they don't want to be held accountable for unprotected copulation
@@lordjaashin its not the same, if someone wasnt born ur not killing anyone :)
@@kosiaz1837 born is a subjective word. for example, Japanese people count your age from the time of your conception not from the time when you were delivered by mother.
so saying "born" isn't going to hold any weight for justification for abortion.
@@lordjaashin "born is a subjective word"
Lmao bro what are you smoking? A person is born when they exit their mother's uterus. What else could it possibly mean?
I was half-asleep scrolling through videos but goddamn did that first sentence wake me up
Do you think that future insurance policies will have STD exceptions?
Probably anything that can go wrong in a car that isn’t a resulting injury to a car.
Personally don’t see anything wrong with it. He had insurance and they didn’t directly say that it wasn’t in their policy.
They made a mistake and they should’ve corrected and defended themselves but their cocky attitude resulted in them not taking legal defense over the situation.
They also have denied thousands of people coverage when it was 100% in their policy to begin with. (Car crashes, roll overs, additional accidents)
So I’m really not gonna be sad for a company with a 36 billion dollar net worth. What she’s asking for is chump change in their eyes.
"This asshole gave me hiv. I'm gonna fuckin sue Geico!"
@@zachdrasher128 Dude... You DO realize this was a joke the person made right? Or did you not notice the quotation marks? XD
HPV not HIV
@@codyknight3580 i didnt notice the quote marks
If Geico loses, I will lose all respect for the legal field. This is not about shilling for a company, this is about the basic understanding that when you willingly engage in sexual intercourse, regardless of the location, it is not insurance that is responsible if you catch a disease, it is you and the one who gave it to you who is responsible
Then don’t include that in ur insurance
@@kingofgrim4761 Geico already won the case. This is old.
yea… THIS specifically is what will break your camel back. You comment section people just love to say things for the sake of literally just saying things.
I’ve already lost respect for the legal field, I hate them. Problem is what are people supposed to do about it? The legal system needs redone BADLY
Woman: It happened in his car!
Geico: I missed the part where that’s my problem.
It's in their contract lol.
That's an interesting one. A good attorney & some luck can go a long way, sometimes.
so, if i contract a disease in an insured car without having known that the person had said disease, i can sue the insurance?
Welp, after this case the insurance companies have obviously fixed this loophole
I mean, you can do it, like as you can try to eat lava, stealth a car and so on. But you wont get anything, because car insurance cover damage to the car or cars (if you crash to someone) most of the time they dont cover healt insurance
I have no sympathy for insurance companies, but it would be so dumb if they have to pay her. She should have to pay a class action to everyone who heard about this story to compensate us for how ridiculous this is.
I shed no tears for the loss of cash from scummy insurance corp, but this really just shows the stupidity of the law system.
How the fuck can you sue a company that had nothing to do with you getting an STD?
That's like trying to make the hotel you got pregnant in pay child support.
My editor would like to ask you if you understood his Witch-Hazel joke. He's very concerned. Comment 👍below if you understood. Comment "Get better jokes, Alec" if you didn't
Sorry Alec, but please get better jokes
... get better jokes, Alec😬
👍
Hey better jokes Alec 😂
Get better jokes, Alec
The virus could have come from any contact over her lifetime, there may be details left out from the public.
Doesn't matter. The guy and lady settled and came to an agreement.
Geico could have taken up the legal case and defended the man properly, instead they ignored him and let them do what they wanted.
They fucked up on multiple levels.
The fact of the case has been settled.
This is ridiculous there is no way that that much money is deserved and no way that car insurance has anything to do with it
That's like suing a bar for getting knocked up in a 1 night stand...
This is totally insane & if the court ruled in favor to her that would be rediculous as hell . I don't know in which logic they sueing the company & what make more rediculous is the amount of money they asking for !
Insurance company covered this type of bodily harm, a loophole in the contract.
The lady and guy informed the insurance company they were going to arbitration.
Geico should have stepped in and defended their insured. Instead they left him to his and legal aid in which the lady and guy came to an agreement.
Geico being under the contract was still obliged to pay for the bodily harm.
Instead they should have challenged the lady and guy in court, but they didn't. They fucked up.
There was no judge and no courts. This is all on Geico because they demand binding arbitration for dispute resolution because the arbitrators almost always side with the insurance company but they figured that the arbitrators would just side with them anyway so didn't bother to argue their case and got a default judgement against them. Turnabout is fair play in my book and Geico has probably saved way more than $5mill by screwing people through arbitration panels. I have no sympathy for them they've been screwing people with these binding arbitration panels for decades, but now its unfair cause its biting them for once? Please cry me a river.
So if I give a friend a ride in my car and that friend infects me with Covid during the drive, I can get compensation from car insurance for that?
Technicalities, but can be thrown by judge
"There can be no making, application, nor practice of law undermines the intents and purposes of the law, and to do so would be a crime." Car insurance is not intended to insure unlawful activity conducted in a car. The Bar Association is a criminal organization.
Oh American justice system..you never cease to amaze..
I want to know is how in the world is it Geico's problem like seriously how is that his their problem
It isn't literally, just legally. I have no idea but I assume GEICO is supposed to provide something when you lose property and am somehow hurt inside the car, such as contracting a life-threatening disease. I'm not saying this is justified by actual logic, but I personally don't have much of a problem with it.
@@edward1838 it surpose to be like if the guy get into a car accident and get the other person to lose their vision or loss legs or something like that, then geico will cover them up.
@@edward1838 in which this is not the case for this case since it just 2 people having sex inside of the car , in which the car doesn't play any role.
@@zaipollizamabdulmalek5822 but the legal contract wasn't specific enough for this loophole meaning they were responsible.
@@zaipollizamabdulmalek5822 Accidents are never well defined because there are too many ways to get into an accident. The woman just used the interpretation to her advantage
Man we really need to use common sense more often
yes
Wow this is new. Can't wait to see the results.
I love how at no point was Geico's argument:
"We insure the car"
This needs to be thrown out immediately the women has equal responsibility as the man does to protect themselves and their partners from STD. And what if he didn’t know he had one this is ridiculous that it’s even being entertained your insurance company especially vehicles is not responsible. Courts these days.
I’m thinking of the future pick up lines.
Hey gurl, I got STI and geico insurance. how about we split 5 mil in my car
Good one 😂
That woman should not get the money. It’s on her and her responsibility. Stupid claims because of her is what raises rates.
Doctors in court:
"Yea, the guy gave the girl an std."
The Judge:
"Geico, how do you plea? Guilty? Good, time for lunch."
A humiliating mark on the USA. The fact this has any legs to it is embarrassing.
I once spilled ketchup, relish, mustard on my white t shirt cus of my homies car that was insured by geico. He had to press the brakes cus a car cut him off. Now I'm traumatized in eating burgers and hot dogs while riding in cars, think you can help me out sir?
I really hope she gets nothing. It really sets a bad precident and I'd rather my cost for insurance doesn't go up because of dumb.
She should get paid. Geico fucked up by sending this to arbitration, instead of the courts. Usually this works for them because arbiters more often side with the insurance company and give smaller payouts. But now that the arbiter didn't side with Geico, the company is whining that it didn't go to court
@@OuterCraftso why does she deserve 5 mil?
@@OuterCraftarbitration isn’t a court of law it’s a way to stop it from getting into a court if it fails you can still go to court arbitration is trying to get them to agree
Imagine being the guy
>be irresponsible and do the dirty while having a disease
>woman blames you for catching disease
>make the car you did it on handle it
>dont face any consequences
>live happily ever after
Imagine being the woman
>be irresponsible and get in some stranger's backseat
>get a disease
>sue his fucking car insurance because you can't deal with the consequences of your own actions
@@skilless935The woman didn't sue the car insurance. The court case is about Geico disagreeing with the arbitration.
That's ridiculous! What if I burn my house while in my car? Do they pay for that too? That woman is crazy and the court is bias towards her
On one hand, it seems insane that Geico would have liability in a case like this. On the other hand, Geico would totally avoid paying out their customers if there was any sort of contractual loophole or legal technicality that they could abuse. So I'll take the woman's side in this. If Geico is liable because of technicality, then she should totally use it to claim her money.
I have no idea wht i just watched lmao i thought the prblm would be between the man nd the woman why is the insurance company involved...
Because Geico car insurance covers damage done from physical activities and yes Sex is a physical activity.. Also it covers any damage including medical damage done by negligence or some other reasons in the car by the owner of the car and insurance policy...
It appears to me that there is a reply here but I can't see it for some reason is this a glitch or was the reply deleted or what?
@@Kissiehyudo me too it said 2 reply’s but I only see one that yours
Loophole in Geicos contract, it probably wasn’t specific enough and it could accidentally be interpreted to include cases like this. They were also too stupid to take legal action initially to defend themselves so good on the woman’s lawyer
Kissie Hyudo. Same but even more perplezing.Can anyone explain the season of the witch overlay in regards to this case? Seems weirdly out of place...what am I missing?
You get what you get and you don't get upset
True
Case101: Reckless driving resulting to STD
And if geico loses in October... it'll by proxy, make them GUILTY AND LIABLE... For all of the damages that happened next...
I believe they won and don't have to pay the lady,
only in america you can sue a vehicle insurance company for getting an std
I don’t get how stds should be covered by a car insurance company
She clearly used the situation to become a millionaire 🤑
Why are they even involved lmao
If I understand correctly it is because it's in their policy, they were suppose to represent the guy in court but failed to because they didn't take the case seriously. So yeah they "messed around and found out"🤷🏾♀️
Even random people in a car insured by Geico can't escape Mike's wrath 🗿
I fell down the stairs and decided to sue the construction company of the neighbors house
They could take it to the Supreme Court. I think that would be a interesting case.
No that'll never happen. The Supreme Court only deals with federal cases.
@@theskyworrier Sounds like Geico did try the federal route too, who then sent it back down to the lower courts because Geico didn't get a proper defense
Geico wants arbitration then denies it, 😂 I think it's brilliant!
Good thing the Missouri Supreme Court overturned the lower court ruling, absolutely absurd that any sort of ruling should go in favor to that woman in the first place.
Always do dangerous things in your car. Unprotected sex, defusing a c4, performing a surgery…
She should be in jail for a bogus lawsuit
Geico: we insure damages to cars not people who drive the cars
Not correct. If your in an accident, the other person goes to the hospital and you are at fault. The insurance company is liable
Like the person above me said, that how car insurance work. But it doesn't make sense when the car doesn't have any role of why 2 people have sex in car and caught STD
That is utterly insane 🤯 I can't believe that they actually even have to defend themselves smh I'm utterly at a complete loss. This wasn't even a car accident. On top of that she actively chose to engage in a sexual encounter with that gentleman
Arbitration was like: Fuck it why not?😂
I like how Geico argued "yeah it could've been from somewhere else", rather than, you know, literally saying that it is not insured.
While I’m happy for a company to lose money in lawsuits to individuals, this is absolutely outrageous
im amazed Geico didn't just negotiate the suit down to a lower nuisance fee and let it go
Could've probably settled out of court for sub one million.
Well a million people suddenly get HPV in cars. Then what.
@@jacobp.2024they shouldn't have needed to spend a cent
Wow, I wish all car insurance covers STD infections 😁😆🤣
The only thing I can say is that I'm trying to help my mom get her reinstated w/ Geico. Cause her debit card was stolen. She now has a new debit card and every time I call, I get hung up on!! What! You don't want her back payments!??? Plus reinstate her back?? Maybe it's time for a different car insurer. Idk. EXTREEMLY frustrated. Back n forth for 4 hours!
As defense, GEICO appeals by saying they're "giving it one last shot."
The prosecution responded with irony by suggesting it was the defendant's turn "...to swallow their pride."
GEICO didn't choke. They released a statement refusing to duplicate the consensual illicit behavior that provided an opportunity for plaintiff's allegations.
The judge, arbitrator, and any other legal officials in this case should be [redacted]
💀💀💀
I love seeing insurance companies being screwed over like they screw up a lot of people
I hope geico doesn’t lose this one… I can’t take another rate increase
Any way to take money out of their pockets! I really hope this lady wins
If it was the other way around, it would be thrown out of every court in the country
soooo
“I didn’t bother buying a condom so I’m gonna get legal on my insurance’s ass”
makes sense to meee
This is not the guys fault though. Oral HPV has no symptoms and is transmited through unknown means (likely saliva, but last time I checked that was not proven)
@@stixinst5791 exactly oral hpv is one of the most common std because most people don't know they are contagious before they show signs. It's also why you should never kiss a baby on the face or hands. It can be fatal to infants and small children.
Merica
At least She should’ve rather sued a condom company ( even when she never used it😅😅) than Geico 🤨
Wait so Geico failed to do the one thing they were supposed to do?
Would make more sense if she was coming after the guys health insurance to pay for her stuff but car insurance doesn't make any sense because car insurance as far as I'm aware is for damage between different cars.
GODDAMN, that’s a comprehensive policy.
I really believe that judges, jurors, mediators are in cahoots with these people who are suing for such ridiculous reasons. They are getting a cut of the money.
Geico literally only had to say that its a car insurance company, not a health insurance company and this case falls under health insurance.
My truck got broken into a couple years ago and some property was stolen. My insurance said that because the truck itself wasnt stolen and i was at home, the missing property fell under home owners, and they were only liable for the window
Whoever these courts and judges in Missouri are they need to take the bar again because that's idiotic.
Quite honestly she deserves too lose the case. The question is pretty simple "did the car give her the condition?" obviously no it was the man she was sleeping with. Open shut case
Stuff like this where someone is just waiting time by going to higher and higher courts should be penalized more if the ruling still turns out against them. Geico should be paying 10 mill by the end if the court still is ruling against them
She doesn't deserve the cash. This is dumb.
It just goes to show you, that senseless or baseless lawsuits shouldn't be ignored or taken lightly. They should've went to court instead of mediation.
At first I was on geicos side but then I realized geico is an insurance company and they screw over people every day. So now I'm on the fence lol
Please use any sound effect but that one. I checked my personal and work phones before rewinding.