CREATIONIST CLOWN THINKS ROCKS PROVE GOD!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 вер 2024
  • #scimandan #evolution #creationism #creationist #god #religion #christianity #atheist #atheism #intelligentdesign
    Hello, my fellow critical thinkers. Today I would like talk about a man called John B. Andelin. He is an American medical doctor of sorts, who now makes UA-cam videos in which he mostly tries to debunk evolution. He believes in the myth of 'intelligent design'. Which is remarkable for someone with a university degree. His youtube channel is called Mask Of Science.
    Sci-Man-Dan made a video about him the other day, prompting me to have a look at the Mask Of Science channel myself. And mister Andelin belongs to this specific category of men who present themselves as being scientifically educated, but then they have no clue as to what science really is.
    Up front I must say that, this guy says so many weird and crazy stuff that I can only address a small portion of it. Having said that, let's listen to him.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 518

  • @Lord.Kiltridge
    @Lord.Kiltridge Рік тому +10

    The only things religion ever proved was how gullible people can be and the willingness of others to exploit them.

    • @oldbatwit5102
      @oldbatwit5102 Рік тому +3

      Plus an easy way to own big airplanes.

  • @bradypustridactylus488
    @bradypustridactylus488 Рік тому +22

    At the end of Curious George episodes on PBS, there is usually a kindergarten class where the kids explore the principles George encountered in his adventure. In one episode, the children worked with soap bubbles. The soap bubbles were always spherical. It didn't matter what shape the wand was, square, slotted, star-shape, or serrated, the bubble produced was a sphere. Maybe, Dr Andelin was absent that day of kindergarten.

    • @f145hr3831jr
      @f145hr3831jr Рік тому +1

      This can actually be explained with maths: the sphere is the optimal shape for a bubble because this is the three-dimensional shape with the lowest surface/volume ratio possible, which maximizes the outer membrane's thickness and minimizes the internal tension from the air inside.
      I'm sure Dr Andelin mentioned maths at the beginning of the video...

  • @frozentspark2105
    @frozentspark2105 Рік тому +13

    Every street preacher ive come across says they found Jesus while they were addicted to drugs and alcohol, soooo 🤔

    • @bladerunner3314
      @bladerunner3314 Рік тому

      And generally bad people - and of course they have all been atheists, yet don't understand anything scientific - not a pre-requisit, but the case pretty much across the board

    • @yvito125
      @yvito125 Рік тому +3

      Funny bc it's true. You have to be on hard times to find God

    • @grahvis
      @grahvis Рік тому

      Simply a tactic used to make the claimant sound more credible. Flat earthers will tell you how they thought flat earth was nonsense until they looked into it.

    • @AdmiralBison
      @AdmiralBison Рік тому +6

      @@yvito125 but it's more likely Religion preys on those who are emotionally vulnerable and poor.
      I wouldn't be surprised there is a higher correlation of alcohol, firearms and churches the poorer a region is.

    • @greengelacid2061
      @greengelacid2061 Рік тому

      ​​​@@yvito125ever been to NA or AA?...they literally drive God down the throat of people when they're most vulnerable...religion is disgusting...

  • @tomkrump3329
    @tomkrump3329 Рік тому +3

    Why do apologists think that assertions equal evidence? "What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." - C. Hitchens

  • @murder1800
    @murder1800 Рік тому +11

    Ah, yes, the Rock God: all praise Jimi Hendrix! [Hymns include: Third Stone From The Sun, Stone Free, Stepping Stone, All Along The Watchtower, Calling All The Devil's Children, Message Of Love, and many many more. He died age 27 to atone for the sins of those not devoted to the Rock religion.]

    • @philipscannell9220
      @philipscannell9220 Рік тому

      Let's not forget the Rolling Stones,Muddy Waters-" I'm a rolling stone"and Bob Dylan-"Like A Rolling Stone".

  • @whatevername8551
    @whatevername8551 Рік тому +13

    This MD talking about math is like me trying to speak German.

  • @jenna2431
    @jenna2431 Рік тому +11

    The next Roger Mudfossil. All he needs is the requisite feather pointer.

  • @grapeshot
    @grapeshot Рік тому +27

    Well, there is deities made out of rocks, I think of Easter Island. But that doesn't change the fact that it's still just a rock and has no supernatural powers.

    • @rembrandt972ify
      @rembrandt972ify Рік тому +2

      You don't know, were you there? 😛

    • @Graeme_Lastname
      @Graeme_Lastname Рік тому +2

      @@rembrandt972ify It's a better guess than god dood it. 🖖

    • @pineapplepenumbra
      @pineapplepenumbra Рік тому

      @@rembrandt972ify "were you there?"
      Easter Island?

    • @rembrandt972ify
      @rembrandt972ify Рік тому

      @@pineapplepenumbra Not me, I've never been south of Matamoros.

    • @pineapplepenumbra
      @pineapplepenumbra Рік тому

      @@rembrandt972ify The furthest south I've been is South Africa, but I was only 2 or 3 and can't remember it (despite remembering other things from earlier, but my memory of my extreme youth is patchy, thank goodness).

  • @laomei1855
    @laomei1855 Рік тому +18

    Apparently, he does have a MD and is a practicing pathologist in North Dakota. Clearly, being a doctor doesn't mean he knows how to form and articulate an effective philosophical argument. My response to him would be, "Spare me your crackpot theories and go look at cadavers."

    • @hasegawataizo4069
      @hasegawataizo4069 Рік тому

      You are a very open-minded individual who does not sound like a troglodyte, at all.

    • @victorfinberg8595
      @victorfinberg8595 Рік тому

      combining the two facts you present, that proves the guy's criminal intent.

    • @jamesarnette1394
      @jamesarnette1394 Рік тому +2

      To look at a cadaver, he would merely have to look into a mirror.

    • @skateboardingjesus4006
      @skateboardingjesus4006 Рік тому +1

      ​@@jamesarnette1394His cerebral activity is on par with a cadaver's.

    • @ArKritz84
      @ArKritz84 11 місяців тому

      He's clearly been sniffing formaldehyde for a bit too long.

  • @christasimon9716
    @christasimon9716 Рік тому +6

    Rock proves God, Paper disproves Spock, Spock smashes Scissors...

  • @MgtowRubicon
    @MgtowRubicon Рік тому +3

    If you believe in magic or supernatural beings, then ask yourself, "What would it take to change my belief?"
    If nothing in reality can change your belief, then your belief is based on nothing in reality.
    If anyone claims to believe in magic or any supernatural beings, then just say two words: "PROVE IT!"

  • @mihaelamcrae8770
    @mihaelamcrae8770 Рік тому +8

    These are the scariest and most dangerous specimens. So sad because of the access and influence he has over other people in general

  • @meridianheights6255
    @meridianheights6255 Рік тому +6

    Look at you! You just popped up in my feed. Cool video. Liked and subscribed. I like my critical thinking and debunking videos with humor. Great work.

  • @kenbattor6350
    @kenbattor6350 Рік тому +12

    'Evolution is mathematically impossible.' Try telling that to Population Geneticists. Population Genetics has some robust mathematics

    • @pansepot1490
      @pansepot1490 Рік тому +2

      Exactly: first thing I thought. It’s all mathematics.

    • @davidcarney1533
      @davidcarney1533 Рік тому +1

      Or the global flood. Mathematical impossibility on every level

    • @richardgardiner242
      @richardgardiner242 Рік тому +1

      And radiometric dating - from physics, and geology - from chemistry, and fossil morphology - from measurement.

  • @pierreblignaut5859
    @pierreblignaut5859 Рік тому +3

    It's good to be reminded that even people like Kent Hovind, are not in fact, the bottom of the barrel.

    • @victorfinberg8595
      @victorfinberg8595 Рік тому

      no, kh is the bottom of the barrel, due to his overt malice

  • @maxdoubt5219
    @maxdoubt5219 Рік тому +5

    Actually, it would be much harder to mathematically describe a lumpy rock than a sphere. The sphere can be described with just the density and radius. So does more complex or less complex point to a "designer"?

    • @akizeta
      @akizeta Рік тому

      There's this quote I like about design: "Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away." A sphere is less complicated than a rough, random shape, but is more evidential of design. Organisms tend to be very complicated…

    • @skateboardingjesus4006
      @skateboardingjesus4006 Рік тому

      What this Creationist clown doesn't understand is that literally any rock has as low a probability of being the very particular shape it is, as any other rock, and probably lower than a spherical one.

  • @johnwho4794
    @johnwho4794 Рік тому +4

    I’m an MD and I can categorically say that there is hardly any maths involved in the basic medical degree. For this fella to try and talk complex formulas to prove or disprove evolution is just plain bonkers!

    • @jamesarnette1394
      @jamesarnette1394 Рік тому

      Math is singular, not plural.

    • @jamesarnette1394
      @jamesarnette1394 Рік тому

      Your response shows that you don't know any math. And so your claim is verified.

    • @victorfinberg8595
      @victorfinberg8595 Рік тому +2

      @@jamesarnette1394 actually, english people say "maths" to mean "mathematics"
      they also say crisps when the correct word is chips
      etc.

    • @victorfinberg8595
      @victorfinberg8595 Рік тому

      i know, i know, we tried to drum calculus into you lot, but you avoided those classes

    • @johnwho4794
      @johnwho4794 Рік тому

      Thanks for the defence. I like it how the smart ass tried to say, I can’t spell maths/math and therefore I’m bad at maths/math. He’s the exact kind of moron Sound of Science is trying to highlight in his videos. 😀

  • @mikefochtman7164
    @mikefochtman7164 Рік тому +2

    Regarding 'round' things. I invite the good doctor to come north to a cold climate and look for 'ice circles'. A phenomenon where small bits of ice on a slow river/ stream bump and grind against each other, resulting in many nearly perfectly circular rings of ice. Just random collisions as they move along, but resulting in something with a high degree of order.

  • @steveswangler6373
    @steveswangler6373 Рік тому +3

    Being an MD does not mean a person has ability in any other field. This man proves it.
    Look at Ben Carson, he was apparently a brilliant brain surgeon, but pretty much completely ignorant about everything else

  • @robchilders
    @robchilders Рік тому +2

    Guess the good doctor never saw concretions either.

  • @jamesarnette1394
    @jamesarnette1394 Рік тому +9

    As a rock, I agree with this video.

  • @MrCanis4
    @MrCanis4 Рік тому +2

    Science is the same all over the world. Religion can already differ on the other side of the village.

  • @Unsensitive
    @Unsensitive Рік тому +3

    The real question is
    "Do rocks think clowns prove god?"

  • @bladerunner3314
    @bladerunner3314 Рік тому +50

    Philosophy, the hiding place you chose, when you have no facts.

    • @marcdc6809
      @marcdc6809 Рік тому +8

      good point, I'm also a bit cautious with a set of thinking exercises that don't seem to agree with the things we can observe and measure.

    • @frozentspark2105
      @frozentspark2105 Рік тому +7

      Eh-hem, cough. Jordan Peterson

    • @johnrap7203
      @johnrap7203 Рік тому +8

      I once made a comment in a stream, "Three philosophers at lunch will argue endlessly about how many are at the table."
      An immediate great reply, "Define table." 😂🤣😂🤣
      While hillarious, it demonstrates, quite cleverly, the mindset and approach of philosophers
      Philosophers will almost endlessly argue/discuss a problem or question.
      But scientists will actually get on with solving them.

    • @SNORKYMEDIA
      @SNORKYMEDIA Рік тому

      copy/paste much?@blankvision2771

    • @MrCanis4
      @MrCanis4 Рік тому

      @@johnrap7203 When Philosophers disagree with you, they can still question the definition of a word, right? 😋

  • @GarethLazelle
    @GarethLazelle Рік тому +1

    Someone should point out to him that every single raindrop is perfectly spherical, as it's the most aerodynamic shape,

    • @oldbatwit5102
      @oldbatwit5102 Рік тому

      Erm.... no they aren't, just the really little ones.

  • @fred_derf
    @fred_derf Рік тому +2

    How come the only place I can find a link to this quote, "no human inquiry can be considered science unless it pursues its path through mathematical exposition and demonstration" is on a _Debunking the Theory of Evolution_ web site? (and even then it no longer appears on that site).

  • @jeremymorse2087
    @jeremymorse2087 Рік тому +2

    Quite remarkable that he’s able to stand, breath and speak all at the same time with such limited brain function.

  • @thecommonsensechannel6268
    @thecommonsensechannel6268 Рік тому +3

    Should someone point out that the probability of any particular shape has the same probability as any other it’s just we assign significance to a perfect sphere

  • @davidbudge8359
    @davidbudge8359 Рік тому +2

    According to his Google bio he's a pathologist and is probably pathologically bonkers.

  • @ChixieMary
    @ChixieMary Рік тому +4

    It's amazing how this channel is all about exposing scams.
    The first top post is SPAM, offering a financial SCAM.
    Somebody besides me should report them.
    😀

    • @RolfStones
      @RolfStones Рік тому +2

      Almost the entire thread looks like bot spam. Did not see this kind of spam earlier... I reported all bots!

    • @tonyclif1
      @tonyclif1 Рік тому +5

      I've also reported the scam, but it's not from the channel. It's a spammer who has extra accounts that APPEAR to ask the OP questions about the money they make. If you look at the posts, most of the comments come from fairly new accounts, all set up at the same time.
      You will find similar posts all over UA-cam, all with many new accounts, often praising some financial guru with two first names, with poor English grammar.

    • @pansepot1490
      @pansepot1490 Рік тому +3

      ⁠@@tonyclif1 fun thing it’s when these scam posts praise Jesus for their financial success on an atheist channel. 😅
      However the report has worked so far because I didn’t see it.

    • @johnrap7203
      @johnrap7203 Рік тому +2

      I also reported it as "Spam..."
      It disappeared from this section for me immediately after. 🤔

    • @Steelmage99
      @Steelmage99 Рік тому

      @@johnrap7203 Yes, that is how the "Report" function works.
      Once you "Report" you can no longer see it. :)

  • @peterprentice9179
    @peterprentice9179 Рік тому +3

    doctor should stick to medicine . . . and leave the mathematics to mathematicians

  • @philipscannell9220
    @philipscannell9220 Рік тому +2

    To quote a line from the movie"Inherit The Wind"-" I believe in the Rock Of Ages Not in the age of rocks".😅

  • @187nemesis3
    @187nemesis3 Рік тому +1

    8:11
    Vince Ebert said: "That's why one idiot can claim more nonsens in 1 minute, than a scientist can refute in his whole life."

    • @victorfinberg8595
      @victorfinberg8595 Рік тому

      it's funny, but incorrect. properly done, you can refute the idiot in equal time. but generally, it takes much longer to prove the truth than it does to lie.

    • @187nemesis3
      @187nemesis3 Рік тому

      @@victorfinberg8595 i don'T know if you know Vince Ebert. He his a german physicist and comedian.

    • @victorfinberg8595
      @victorfinberg8595 Рік тому

      @@187nemesis3 thanks, i did check him out. as a physicist and german-speaker, i can confirm that he is first rate. 8it was literally one howler after another.
      nevertheless, what i posted above remains correct.

  • @odojang
    @odojang Рік тому +3

    ''Math disproves it'' is what they said to Sikorsky when he used insect flight to invent the helicopter.
    Remember, Dr Ben Carson is also an MD who, after decades of hard study and practical experience using state of the art medical knowledge, technology and professional assistance, was the first to successfully separate brain-coinjoined twins. And then he attributed it all to his god.
    This self-declared doctor sure can talk about miracle rocks.

    • @dancingnature
      @dancingnature Рік тому

      Ben Carson is a genius neuroscientist. When it comes to other subjects he’s a dunce . He said that the Egyptian pyramids were granaries. Really boo?

    • @odojang
      @odojang Рік тому

      @@dancingnature Indeed. Mastery of a field or being right in one instance in no way makes one master of everything or right everytime. Only dictators and morons think they have omniscience and absolute wisdom.

  • @Vadjong
    @Vadjong Рік тому +2

    The moon is a pretty smooth spherical rock. 🌚

  • @alexhetherington8028
    @alexhetherington8028 Рік тому +1

    Its funny how he shows a round rock as some kind of evidence for his claim and yet there are examples of perfectly occuring spheres in nature 😂

  • @izmark671
    @izmark671 Рік тому +3

    Preach to them when they're 'stoned', maybe they'll believe.

  • @RolfStones
    @RolfStones Рік тому +5

    As someone who is into fossils and minerals, rocks/crystals can have all kinds of shapes.

  • @Dr_Wrong
    @Dr_Wrong Рік тому +1

    "Always random" is an oxym0r0n..
    Randomly random seems more his intentions..

  • @Truth-Be-Told-USA
    @Truth-Be-Told-USA Рік тому +1

    Nothing proves invisible spirits. No one has ever been able to prove that any exist

  • @oscarmudd6579
    @oscarmudd6579 Рік тому

    Creationists DON'T think; that's the problem. They're not allowed to.

  • @Mewse1203
    @Mewse1203 Рік тому

    They gish gallop with nonsense and then call victory when you can't every point due to time constraints

  • @tonydarcy1606
    @tonydarcy1606 Рік тому +1

    "It's only rock n' roll, but I like it." (Jagger )

  • @wrekced
    @wrekced Рік тому +1

    Here on the west coast of the US there is a whole beach full of round stones! Look up cannonball beach...

  • @marcdc6809
    @marcdc6809 Рік тому +1

    I thought religion is about being humble... but creationists try to sell you the idea that something so special and beautiful and perfect as human life can't have come from natural forces... if you consider yourself special and beautiful, is that still humble? ...
    there's still a need to apply the heimlich-maneuvre to save somebody's life... is that perfect conscious design?
    it doesn't mean that an atheist can't feel good about being alive, or sit in wonder about things that occur in nature...

  • @grahvis
    @grahvis Рік тому +1

    Andelin is a pathologist, though he is better known as a sculptor.
    On the beach where I live, the erosion causes rock to fall from the cliff. Those that in some way end up away from the cliff base, retain their jagged edges, those that stay at the base of the cliff, are pounded into round shapes.

  • @lyndafjellman3315
    @lyndafjellman3315 Рік тому +1

    I'm having a really hard time conflating his premise that nature is "always" random with god and everything being planned. Did his god *plan* and *design* that everything should be random? Is there a point to this god if everything is random? How can he tell the difference between god's total randomness and no god at all???

  • @topcat2069
    @topcat2069 11 місяців тому

    "Ignorant arrogance seems to be a major attribute of "plebeian" (low) christianity" with little or no understanding of science or truth".

  • @aaronbredon2948
    @aaronbredon2948 Рік тому

    You can make round rocks by randomly tumbling them in a rock tumbler.
    So random forces make round rocks.

  • @corringhamdepot4434
    @corringhamdepot4434 Рік тому

    Apologists never understand probability when they claim that "random" processes can't produce apparent order. The always equate the improbable with the impossible. Most kids have found almost round stones to play marbles with. There are so many, that by the laws of probability there must exist the "perfect" round stone somewhere, if only we looked long enough. Therefore, there is no need for a god. PS: Do kids still play marbles? 🤔

  • @davonuk1
    @davonuk1 Рік тому +1

    I'd say this guy's rocks are in his own head.

  • @Kinessmata-Akkadian
    @Kinessmata-Akkadian Рік тому

    Mask of Science: "Evolution isn't possible because it's mathematically impossible."
    Me, "an intellectual": You're right... But not for the reasons you think.
    It's not really tied to math like that, genius.

  • @douglascutler1037
    @douglascutler1037 Рік тому

    For a moment there I thought the premise was 'Rock Proves God'. Like heck yeah, maybe ROCK DOES prove God, go for it man . . . Hendrix, Zep, Stones, Beatles . . .
    But then I realized it was just plain old rocks like in geology class. Oh well . . . .

  • @kitchencarvings4621
    @kitchencarvings4621 11 місяців тому

    There is no chance of randomness in nature because everything that exists is natural, has a specific nature or identity, acts according to that identity, and is not capable of acting against its
    nature. Therefore, there are no causeless actions. Chance or randomness is really an epistemological concept and not a metaphysical one. It refers to our inability to predict some actions because we don't have enough data. But just because we can't exactly predict something, doesn't mean that it is random. All actions have a cause and the cause is the nature of the thing that acts. When human beings make a choice that is not random either. It's an entity acting according to its nature. Man's nature is the cause, and the ability to make choices is the effect.

  • @bobmudge4836
    @bobmudge4836 Рік тому +4

    And creationism passes all mathematical tests how? Or is it exempt?

    • @thomaswigfield7623
      @thomaswigfield7623 Рік тому +1

      Bob, I was about to post the same question when I read yours.

    • @bobmudge4836
      @bobmudge4836 Рік тому

      @@thomaswigfield7623 Great minds ….

    • @thomaswigfield7623
      @thomaswigfield7623 Рік тому

      @@bobmudge4836
      Indeed, let’s pat each other on the back!

  • @f145hr3831jr
    @f145hr3831jr Рік тому

    7:31 This is actually a very popular disingenuous debate tactic called the gish gallop (I think it also has other names), to vomit a load of nonsensical bullshit in a small time frame, then sit back and watch the opponent disprove only a small portion of it (because making a false statement takes 10 seconds, disproving it takes several minutes), and declare at the end of the debate that any statement that wasn't disproven is valid by default.

  • @timothymulholland7905
    @timothymulholland7905 Рік тому +2

    Now, now! You know that Jesus spent eternity past sculpting each rock in the universe and placing it careful on each planet. And don’t tell me there wasn’t enough time.

  • @nicolasandre9886
    @nicolasandre9886 Рік тому

    I wonder why so many christian apologists pretend to debunk the theory of evolution, and apparently none of them try to debunk the theory of gravity.

    • @andreas.grundler
      @andreas.grundler Рік тому +2

      They leave that to the flat earthers that happend to be more often than not christians.

    • @victorfinberg8595
      @victorfinberg8595 Рік тому

      @@andreas.grundler no bona fide religions claim that the planet is flat.
      no flat earthers are actual christians.

    • @nicolasandre9886
      @nicolasandre9886 Рік тому +1

      @@christopherhorner-ox4xn that is true, and if I chose a better example like the big bang theory, then the population of apologists denying this theory probably overlaps quite narrowly that which denies evolution.

  • @MarijnvdSterre
    @MarijnvdSterre Рік тому

    If the Earth would have been a cube, that would make it more likely that there was some conscience creation involved. But a sphere is just basic.

  • @philipscannell9220
    @philipscannell9220 Рік тому +2

    Everybody must get stoned!😂

  • @dancingnature
    @dancingnature Рік тому

    I’ve got a biology degree. I’ve heard so much BS from medical doctors about biological facts it’s not funny .

  • @dahshkeeNYer
    @dahshkeeNYer Рік тому

    Drive south from Tuba City, Arizona, and take the first right, so you are heading west. After about 10 miles you begin to see big, round black rocks. They get more and more plentiful the further you drive. After about 25 to 30 miles there is a ridge of black rock, the origin of the round rocks. The ridge is volcanic, and the round rocks are pillow lava which formed when there was a shallow sea that covered the area millions of years ago. All these rocks are round and there was no humans then to shape them. This doctor needs to stick to popping pimples.

  • @FakingANerve
    @FakingANerve Рік тому

    I'm beginning to think the "MD" at the end of his name might not mean "medical doctor." Maybe he's just proud of his home state of Maryland.

  • @heiyuall
    @heiyuall Рік тому

    Knows better. Says anyway. Hurts people. Gets paid. Definition of fraud. Repeal his authority and toss him in jail.
    “And the world will be a better place. For you, and me. Just wait, and seeeeeee…”

    • @victorfinberg8595
      @victorfinberg8595 Рік тому +1

      i totally agree. still, i prefer exile to spending the resources of society on the crook

  • @ianchisholm5756
    @ianchisholm5756 Рік тому

    'Random' is an extremely important word for creationists. They say 'It's either random or it's God' in the knowledge that this false dichotomy will sound reasonable to a scientifically illiterate audience.

  • @Dr_Wrong
    @Dr_Wrong Рік тому

    Math is descriptive.
    Humans made math.
    If 'math' doesn't match reality, then a *_human_* has failed to describe reality.
    It's not reality that has 'gone wrong.'

  • @firecloud77
    @firecloud77 Рік тому

    4:22 *"The theory of evolution is based upon empirical evidence resulting from observation and analysis of organisms and their fossils and DNA technology."*
    The capacity for random gene copying errors and natural selection to write novel code for novel hardware that would bring to fruition novel concepts like hearing, vision and flight have been empirically observed? That is a flat-out *FALSEHOOD.*

  • @WhoThisMonkey
    @WhoThisMonkey Рік тому +1

    There is only one god.
    Rock Astley.

  • @davidbradley6040
    @davidbradley6040 Рік тому

    Who could take him seriously? Fellow doesn't even wear a tie.

  • @AmityvilleFan
    @AmityvilleFan Рік тому

    You'll easily get a ball-shaped stone in nature by throwing the rock into a river.

  • @citizenVader
    @citizenVader Рік тому

    My pair of rocks were enough to be a part of creation of my children, but that doesn't give me the right to chose how they have to live and think.

    • @citizenVader
      @citizenVader Рік тому

      It does give me an opportunity to teach them how to use rational thinking and how to work against the lie of any gods or misguided philosophy.

  • @Byrvurra
    @Byrvurra Рік тому

    One of those reminders that medical doctors are not necessarily scientists, or even particularly science minded, sort of like engineers in that way.

    • @juanausensi499
      @juanausensi499 Рік тому

      I don't remember who said this, but he defined medicine as, basically, plumbing. No disrespect to doctors (or plumbers).

  • @lxlthr4058
    @lxlthr4058 Рік тому

    Their anthem was performed by the Stone Temple Pontius Pilots.

  • @GalaxySid
    @GalaxySid Рік тому +4

    So everything in nature is random. If I cook an egg it might turn into a mediocre rock ballad or tree jesus. Who knows! Just try to Imagine a universe with pure randomness - would be very strange and good luck with you're science there, buddy. This is such a weird statement, it reminds me of Logicked's video on the guy who believes everything that's ever happening is a brand new brute fact.

  • @FourDeuce01
    @FourDeuce01 Рік тому

    Good video, but two things are slightly wrong with the title. “Creationist clown” is redundant, and creationists don’t do any thinking.😂

  • @icepee9252
    @icepee9252 Рік тому

    Mathematics describes reality and, by abstracting reality into the realm of mathematics allows for convenient modeling and prediction. But, mathematics is not enough. It is possible to create perfectly rational and logical mathematical equations that have no bearing on reality.

  • @Mewse1203
    @Mewse1203 Рік тому

    He literally debunks his own argument while making it 😂
    If spherical rocks by natural means are possible but exceedingly rare, that means when you have an uncountabillion number of rocks, you'll probably see a few that were made randomly spherical. The larger the number of items in the sample size, the more likely rarer outcomes become.
    Also, just because a thing is rare doesn't mean its impossible and in fact, nimbers aren't how we determine whether the thing happened. That just calculates LIKELIHOOD or CHANCE of it happening vs not. More than that, if it's possible then you can't say that it only exists due to design just because it exists. We have to analyze the thing further to determine whether it was in fact nature va man made because he just acknowledged it could be natural. You need EVIDENCE of design. Rareness is not evidence of design.

  • @petergriffiths4846
    @petergriffiths4846 8 місяців тому

    If evolution is impossible why do we have to continually update anti -biotics and vaccines to keep up with bacteria and viruses? Doctor.

  • @walterdaems57
    @walterdaems57 Рік тому

    If god existed, there would be no need to prove his existence because he would be perceived or at the very least be experienced by believers and non believers alike and since that’s clearly not the case it’s safe to say that god’s are man made and not the other way around

  • @brianstevens3858
    @brianstevens3858 Рік тому

    The things in the universe are not random on a larger scale at all, they are probabilistic.

  • @nicholasgloc8555
    @nicholasgloc8555 Рік тому

    The rocks in his head is exactly where his god is,all in his head.

  • @kitchencarvings4621
    @kitchencarvings4621 11 місяців тому

    Sorry dude, but I'm a spoon carver and I spend a great amount of time every day evaluating shapes and that rock is not perfectly round. I have found rocks in rivers that are equally "perfectly" round.

  • @tracewallace23
    @tracewallace23 Рік тому +2

    I know that we shouldn't "judge a book by its cover",
    But, that doctor looks a bit on the evil side.
    He looks like the doctor doing evil human experiments in a movie/video game
    If i was going to get a check up and He walked in, 😳 I'd have to say "I feel sick, Something came up, we're going to have to reschedule"
    LoL 🤣😂

  • @justafishingdude
    @justafishingdude Рік тому

    I would point out the Bible has testable, verifiable evidence in the form of specific, fulfilled prophecies - in fact, the Bible is about 1/4 prophecy! In addition to the many, many historical examples of fulfilled prophecy, here are just a few that have happened in the past 100ish years.
    Israel Scattered and returning to her land:
    Deuteronomy 28:64 says, "And the LORD shall scatter thee among all people, from the one end of the earth even unto the other...". Additionally, Ezekiel 36:19-24 says, "I dispersed them among the nations, and they were scattered through the countries; I judged them according to their conduct and their actions. And wherever they went among the nations they profaned my holy name, for it was said of them, ‘These are the Lord’s people, and yet they had to leave his land.’ I had concern for my holy name, which the people of Israel profaned among the nations where they had gone. “Therefore say to the Israelites, ‘This is what the Sovereign Lord says: It is not for your sake, people of Israel, that I am going to do these things, but for the sake of my holy name, which you have profaned among the nations where you have gone. I will show the holiness of my great name, which has been profaned among the nations, the name you have profaned among them. Then the nations will know that I am the Lord, declares the Sovereign Lord, when I am proved holy through you before their eyes. “‘For I will take you out of the nations; I will gather you from all the countries and bring you back into your own land."
    This is quite amazing. God said He would scatter Israel throughout the world for their disbelief and return them back to their land. What other people in the history of mankind has been scattered across the world for hundreds/thousands of years and then returned to their homeland (the very same geographic land) as an identifiable people? This isn't just being moved from one place to another place after being conquered - it is being literally scattered throughout the world. This is unprecedented throughout the history of humankind and yet the Bible said it would happen way before 1948 when Israel was reborn as a nation. In fact, Jews have been returning to Israel from all over the world such as: China, The US, Japan, Russia, India, France, Argentina, Sweden, Spain, Poland, Canada, the UK, South Africa, etc.
    The land divided:
    We are also told the land will be divided in Joel 3:1-2, which says, "In those days and at that time, when I restore the fortunes of Judah and Jerusalem, I will gather all nations and bring them down to the Valley of Jehoshaphat. There I will put them on trial for what they did to my inheritance, my people Israel, because they scattered my people among the nations and divided up my land". Notice that last part "...and divided up My land". It was foretold that the land would be divided! Logically, if it weren't divided then God couldn't put the nations on trial for dividing it.
    Yes, Israel is back in a part of the very same land they used to have just as foretold, but the land has been divided as well (and nations continue dividing and/or trying to divide it to this day). The land was in fact divided by Britain, who was in charge of making this land a place for the Jewish people. Instead much of the land was given to the Arabs/"Palestinians". This was formalized in the United Nations Partition Plan which was adopted by the UN General Assembly On 29 November 1947 Resolution 181. This was written WAY before 1947/1948, yet we now see that the land has been divided by the nations and they keep dividing/trying to divide it to this day. Although this did not actually create the nation of Israel, it divided the ancestral land of the Jews.
    The country reborn in 1 day:
    What's more, the Bible said Israel would be reborn as a nation in 1 day. Isaiah 66:7-8 says, "Before she goes into labor, she gives birth; before the pains come upon her, she delivers a son. Who has ever heard of such things? Who has ever seen things like this? Can a country be born in a day or a nation be brought forth in a moment? Yet no sooner is Zion in labor than she gives birth to her children." This happened May 14, 1948 when Israel declared itself to be a nation and President Truman (the US being a superpower of the time) formally acknowledged them as such. Contrast this with the founding of the US - they declared themselves to be a nation with the declaration of independence in 1776, but no countries acknowledged them as a nation at that time. In fact, the first country to declare them a nation was Morocco in 1777 and the first major world power of the time to acknowledge them was France in 1778.
    Yet, in the case of Israel, Britain's mandate over the land ended at midnight on May 14, 1948 and Israel declared themselves to be a nation and were recognized as a nation in this one day - fulfilling the prophecy with stunning precision!
    Let's step back now and think about these prophecies. The Bible makes the claim that the Jewish people would be scattered throughout the entire world and return to the very land they were in as an identifiable people. To put into perspective just how bold this prophecy is, this feat has never happened to any other people throughout the history of humankind. In essence, the Bible predicted something that has never happened throughout human history would happen to a specific people long before it happened, and it came to pass exactly as foretold! As if that wasn't enough, it foretold that this very land would be divided among the nations, which we know also happened in 1947/1948 and beyond. Even more, it foretold that the nation of Israel would be "born" in 1 day - which happened with stunning accuracy on May 14, 1948! There isn't any other religion out there that offers these kinds of specific prophecies that we know with 100% certainty were written well before they happened.
    We don't need to simply have blind faith in something - we should have a good reason for what we believe and the Bible provides it! Why not accept the gift of salvation today?
    1 Corinthians 15:2-4, "By this gospel you are saved, if you hold firmly to the word I preached to you. Otherwise, you have believed in vain. For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures,"
    John 3:16, "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life".
    Additionally, here is a fabulous, short message on what must we do to be saved (only about ten mins). For something with eternal consequences, it makes sense to at least hear it out right? :) ua-cam.com/video/nWEMY-Su20k/v-deo.html

    • @drewdrake9130
      @drewdrake9130 Рік тому

      Aren't all countries born in one day?
      One day they weren't a country, the next day they are.
      (America would be a good example)

    • @justafishingdude
      @justafishingdude Рік тому

      @@drewdrake9130 Thanks for the reply! America would actually be a good country to contrast with Israel. Allow me to explain. On May 14, 1948 Israel declared themselves to be a nation and President Truman (the US being a superpower of the time) formally acknowledged them as such on that very same day. If we contrast this with the founding of America - they declared themselves to be a nation with the declaration of independence in 1776, but no countries acknowledged them as a nation at that time. In fact, the first country to declare them a nation was Morocco in 1777 and the first major world power of the time to acknowledge them was France in 1778. Yet, in the case of Israel, Britain's mandate over the land ended at midnight on May 14, 1948 and Israel declared themselves to be a nation and were recognized as a nation in this one day - fulfilling the prophecy with stunning precision! :)

  • @tallyhorizzla3330
    @tallyhorizzla3330 Рік тому +2

    Is it just me or does the good doctor look AI generated?

  • @redfoxninja3173
    @redfoxninja3173 Рік тому

    A fool speaks with confidence about something they refuse to understand

  • @jackwaycombe
    @jackwaycombe Рік тому

    Let's be kind to this guy. Mental illness is a terrible burden.

  • @uncleanunicorn4571
    @uncleanunicorn4571 Рік тому

    Math is very much a GiGo thing. Evolution is observable.

  • @percubit10
    @percubit10 Рік тому

    These peiple are freaking nuts.

  • @tomsenior7405
    @tomsenior7405 Рік тому

    Of course Rocks prove god. After all, to a Theist; Trees, Waterfalls, Babies and pretty flowers prove god. A piece of burnt toast proves god. A sheet of cloth proves god. A bag of rusty nails proves god... Every f**king proves god.

    • @andystokes8702
      @andystokes8702 Рік тому

      And yet they never claim that leukaemia, heart disease, bowel cancer, sickle cell disease, cholera, polio etc is proof of god. Always the nice pretty things, trees, waterfalls, babies, flowers but never tsunamis, malaria, yellow fever.

  • @Xwrt532
    @Xwrt532 Рік тому

    Doesn't the very notion of something out of nothing prove the existence and the very essence of GOD?

  • @prtauvers
    @prtauvers Рік тому

    Natural Selection is not random, hence the name.

  • @Edeskenney
    @Edeskenney Рік тому

    I thought it was trees.

  • @oldcountryboy
    @oldcountryboy Рік тому +1

    This guy was a doctor I wonder if he used leeches Or blood blooding Or washes his hands Actually though come to think of it I think they do still use Leeches now that I think about it

  • @peterh7575
    @peterh7575 Рік тому

    volume equalization please!

  • @skitsogaming
    @skitsogaming Рік тому

    What is the mathematical equation for my itchy nose... Seriously I would like not to do that math anymore lol

  • @tabularasa0606
    @tabularasa0606 Рік тому

    I guess he doesn't understand statistics. Evolution is all about statistics.

  • @pdelmontel
    @pdelmontel Рік тому

    This guy confuses randomness with "equal probability of occurrence", as in a lottery. In science, random means unpredictable, and many astronomical and geological phenomena are anything but random.

  • @spidertheateo4344
    @spidertheateo4344 Рік тому

    If he’s disproven of evolution he should be bringing this up with the scientific community not making a UA-cam video

  • @franksoberal483
    @franksoberal483 Рік тому

    🤔 I wonder if kidney stones prove god?
    🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣