Megalopolis is the Worst Movie of the Year

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 787

  • @bilaalbadurdeen2733
    @bilaalbadurdeen2733 Місяць тому +208

    A tribute to Dame Maggie Smith please 🙏

  • @BrownsBacker
    @BrownsBacker Місяць тому +376

    Unfortunately, there comes a time when you take the car keys from grandpa...this is one of those times, but a little too late.

    • @branagain
      @branagain Місяць тому +19

      Best comment

    • @CRM-114
      @CRM-114 Місяць тому +11

      That comment is just disrespectful. The movie does contain some great ideas which I‘m sure went right over your head.

    • @maxhubmann1696
      @maxhubmann1696 Місяць тому

      What does that even mean?

    • @FrakkinToasterLuvva
      @FrakkinToasterLuvva Місяць тому +18

      Not everyone can be like Martin Scorsese in their 80s.

    • @ReligionOfSacrifice
      @ReligionOfSacrifice Місяць тому +1

      @@CRM-114, it isn't about whether it went over your head. I've heard lots of people call this a hot mess and beautiful to watch. I was excited by the trailer and really wanted some apocalyptic mind bender and figured maybe it would help this director make it to my list of favorite directors which goes to 33 names, but he is not one of them. I like the first two Godfather movies, but since making the list of favorite movies both of them fell of my top 350 favorite movies. I think he had something good with "Apocalypse Now" so three good movies. Yet this really was awful to watch. Had this ended with the violent crowd stringing up those they did, hearing the celebrities speak and walk away, and cheering for our main character and then they all disperse back into their poor hovels of homes as the ending I would have said, "What an impression, to show how all these people we watched are all worthless to the common man." I still might have disliked the movie but I would have thought there is an artist doing his work and making his point and breaking all conventions to tell us the people watch all of this, but are unaffected by any of it. It wasn't that. It was stupid.
      25 FAVORITE DIRECTORS OF MOVIES
      As a child I loved "Star Wars" and hated "E.T." so I guess I learned something making this list. I called a series of movies as one placement on the list of good movies for a director.
      1st place Terry Gilliam
      has 8; 6 on my favorites list
      1) The Man who Killed Don Quixote (2017) #36
      2) 12 Monkeys (1995) #59
      3) Monty Python and the Holy Grail (1975) #155
      4) The Adventures of Baron Munchausen (1988) #180
      5) Time Bandits (1981) #260
      6) Tideland (2006) #262
      7) The Brother's Grimm (2005)
      😎 Brazil (1985)
      2nd place Guy Ritchie
      has 6; 4 on my favorites list
      1) Aladdin (2019) #40
      2) The Man from U.N.C.L.E. (2015) #47
      3) The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare (2024) #158
      4) Sherlock Holmnes: A Game of Shadows (2011) #213 - SERIES
      5) The Covenant (2023)
      6) King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017)
      3rd place Robert Zemeckis
      has 10; only 2 on my favorites list
      1) Back to the Future (1985) #23 - SERIES
      2) Forrest Gump (1994) #44
      3) Cast Away (2000)
      4) Pinocchio (2022)
      5) The Polar Express (2004)
      6) Allied (2016)
      7) Contact (1997)
      😎 Romancing the Stone (1984)
      9) Who Framed Roger Rabbit (1988)
      10) Welcome to Marwen (2018)
      4th place John Hughes
      has 10; 5 on my favorites list
      1) The Breakfast Club (1985) #49
      2) National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation (1989) #86 SERIES
      3) Ferris Bueller’s Day Off (1986) #135
      4) Weird Science (1985) #189
      5) Planes, Trains, and Automobiles (1987) #284
      6) Pretty in Pink (1986)
      7) Some Kind of Wonderful (1987)
      😎 Sixteen Candles (1984)
      9) Home Alone (1990)
      10) She’s Having a Baby (1988)
      5th place Satoshi Kon
      directed 4 anime movies; all favorites
      1) Paprika (2006) #33
      2) Perfect Blue (1999) #63
      3) Tokyo Godfathers (2004) #95
      4) Millennium Actress (2003) #102
      6th place Mel Gibson
      has 5 and all on my favorites list
      1) The Passion of the Christ (2004) #29
      2) Braveheart (1995) #161
      3) Apocalypto (2006) #179
      4) The Man Without a Face (1993) #207
      5) Hacksaw Ridge (2016) #270
      7th place James Cameron
      has 5 and all 5 on my favorites list
      1) True Lies (1994) #99
      2) Avatar (2009) #122
      3) Aliens (1986) #128 - SERIES
      4) The Terminator (1984) #210 - SERIES
      5) Titanic (1997) #290
      8th place Steven Spielberg
      has 17; 6 on my favorites list
      1) Schindler's List (1993) #28
      2) Amistad (1997) #77
      3) Saving Private Ryan (1998) #273
      4) Catch Me If You Can (2002) #281
      5) Lincoln (2012) #346
      6) Jurassic Park (1993) #363 - SERIES
      7) The Fabelmans (2022)
      😎 Munich (2005)
      9) E.T. (1982)
      10) Bridge of Spies (2015)
      11) Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) - Indiana Jones SERIES
      12) Jaws (1975) - SERIES
      13) War Horse (2011)
      14) A.I. (2001)
      15) Close Encounters of the Third Kind (1977)
      16) Hook (1991)
      17) The BFG (2016)
      9th place Alfred Hitchcock
      has 5; 3 on my favorites list
      1) Notorious (1946) #27
      2) To Catch a Thief (1955) #76
      3) Psycho (1960) #215
      4) Rear Window (1954)
      5) North by Northwest (1959)
      10th place Christopher Nolan
      has 9; 5 on my favorites list
      1) Man of Steel (2013) #126
      2) Inception (2010) #139
      3) Dunkirk (2017) #168
      4) Oppenheimer (2023) #275
      5) Memento (2000) #348
      6) The Dark Knight (2008) - SERIES
      7) The Following (1998)
      😎 The Prestige (2006)
      9) Insomnia (2002)
      11th place Bill Condon
      has 5; only 2 on my favorites list
      1) Beauty and the Beast (2017) #12
      2) The Greatest Showman (2017) #98
      3) Mr. Holmes (2015)
      4) The Good Liar (2019)
      5) Kinsey (2004)
      12th place Richard Donner
      has 7; 3 on my favorites list
      1) Superman II (1980) #42 - SERIES
      2) Lethal Weapon (1987) #133 - SERIES
      3) The Toy (1982) #151
      4) The Goonies (1985)
      5) Scrooged (1988)
      6) Radio Flyer (1992)
      7) Timeline (2003)
      😎 Ladyhawke (1985)
      13th place Matthew Vaughn
      has 5; 4 on my favorites list
      1) X-men: First Class (2011) #93 - SERIES
      2) Kick-ass (2010) #162 - SERIES
      3) Stardust (2007) #166
      4) Kingsman: the Secret Service (2014) #236 - SERIES
      5) Argylie (2024)
      14th place Martin Scorsese
      has 9; 3 on my list of favorites
      1) Silence (2016) #10
      2) Goodfellas (1990) #320
      3) Taxi Driver (1976) #345
      4) The Irishman (2019)
      5) Killers of the Flower Moon (2023)
      6) The Wolf of Wall Street (2013)
      7) Hugo (2011)
      😎 The Aviator (2004)
      9) Casino (1995)
      15th place John Landis
      has 9; 3 on my favorites list
      1) An American Werewolf in London (1981) #65
      2) Blues Brothers (1980) #97
      3) Coming to America (1988) #327
      4) Trading Places (1983)
      5) The Three Amigos (1986)
      6) Twilight Zone: The Movie (1983)
      7) Beverly Hills Cop III (1994) - SERIES
      😎 Spies Like Us (1985)
      9) Animal House (1978)
      16th place Andrew Adamson
      has 2 and both on my favorites list
      1) Narnia: the Lion, the witch, and the wardrobe (2005) #5 - SERIES
      2) Shrek (2001) #142 - SERIES
      17th place Arthur Hiller
      has 3 and all 3 on my favorites list
      1) Man of La Mancha (1972) #2
      2) Silver Streak (1976) #221
      3) See No Evil, Hear No Evil (1989) #360
      18th place Ridley Scott
      has 11; 4 on my favorites list
      1) Alien (1979) #73 - SERIES
      2) Legend (1985) #119 - director's cut only
      3) Napoleon (2023) #266
      4) Blade Runner (1982) #308
      5) The Last Duel (2021)
      6) House of Gucci (2021)
      7) Robin Hood (2010)
      😎 Exodus: Gods and Kings (2014)
      9) The Martian (2015)
      10) Hannibal (2001) - SERIES
      11) Black Hawk Down (2001)
      19th place Harold Ramis
      has 3; 2 on my favorites list
      1) Caddyshack (1980) #82 - SERIES
      2) National Lampoon's Vacation (1983) #96 - SERIES
      3) Groundhod Day (1993)
      20th place Simon Curtis
      has 6; 4 on my favorites list
      1) Goodbye, Christopher Robin (2017) #13
      2) Woman in Gold (2015) #296
      3) Downton Abbey (2022) #353
      4) The Art of Racing in the Rain (2019) #357
      5) The Chaperone (2018)
      6) My Week with Marilyn (2011)
      21st place Gore Verbinski
      has 5; 3 on my favorites list
      1) Pirates of the Caribbean: Curse of the Black Pearl (2003) #52 - SERIES
      2) A Cure for Wellness (2017) #193
      3) Mouse Hunt (1997) #322
      4) The Mexican (2001)
      5) The Lone Ranger (2013)
      22nd place Guillermo Del Toro
      has 2 and both on my favorites list
      1) Pan’s Labyrinth (2006) - #31 Spanish with English caption
      2) The Shape of Water (2017) #211
      23rd place Roland Emmerich
      has 7; 2 on my favorites list
      1) Midway (2019) #32
      2) Anonymous (2011) #258
      3) Independence Day (1996)
      4) The Patriot (2000)
      5) Godzilla (1998) - SERIES
      6) Stargate (1994)
      7) 2012 (2009)
      24th place Tom Tykwer
      has 4; 3 on my favorites list
      1) Der Krieger und die Kaiserin (2000) #51
      2) Cloud Atlas (2012) #288
      3) Heaven (2002) #333
      4) The International (2009)
      25th place Ivan Reitman
      has 4; 2 on my favorites list
      1) Ghostbusters (1984) #43 - SERIES
      2) Twins (1988) #283
      3) Kindergarten Cop (1990)
      4) Dave (1993)

  • @lukeschlorholtz
    @lukeschlorholtz Місяць тому +145

    Just go see The Wild Robot. It’s a masterpiece and I mean it. It’s so much better than this

    • @Jay-x6i
      @Jay-x6i Місяць тому

      ua-cam.com/video/boZ-bEKDZY4/v-deo.htmlsi=XGkq5JJ6yuABQQNz

    • @-Olea-
      @-Olea- Місяць тому +4

      he has, he mentioned it in his rating of all the movies from TIFF and he was in awe.

    • @scottcopeland3730
      @scottcopeland3730 Місяць тому +7

      I followed Megalopolis with My Old Ass, which ended up a good call, because My Old Ass was a great palate cleanser. It actually knew how to properly cast Aubrey Plaza.

    • @petergrossi6605
      @petergrossi6605 Місяць тому +4

      I’m seeing my old ass tonight and the wild robot tomorrow

    • @luckybucksproductions
      @luckybucksproductions Місяць тому +4

      ​@scottcopeland3730 I'm definitely going to see My Old Ass and The Wild Robot. However, Aubrey was a standout in this. She knew what kind of campy acid trip it was and made the most of it. Lol

  • @DiviAugusti
    @DiviAugusti Місяць тому +173

    Ill wait 10 years until comment section hipsters begin to speak of this movie as a misunderstood masterpiece.

    • @laceykanda995
      @laceykanda995 Місяць тому +28

      And I still won't watch it 😂😂!🫶🏾

    • @libertyfilm4096
      @libertyfilm4096 Місяць тому +1

      😂

    • @DinkusDorf
      @DinkusDorf Місяць тому +27

      10 years? Bro it’s happening NOW.

    • @lymphomasurvive
      @lymphomasurvive Місяць тому +6

      It is misunderstood on every level.

    • @stephenpmurphy591
      @stephenpmurphy591 Місяць тому +14

      ​@@lymphomasurviveNo, it's not as it's a terrible a movie.
      It's pretentious silliness wrapped in bad cgi and laugh out loud bad dialogue..

  • @csmith1453
    @csmith1453 Місяць тому +23

    He doesn't care about the audience here.
    This movie was for him. He's old and knows he's going to die. He is trying to say something deep about life, but he's not Socrates or Aristotle. He doesn't have a lot coherent to say.

  • @Jamal3.87
    @Jamal3.87 Місяць тому +144

    For better or worse, Adam Driver seems to be more interested in working with accomplished filmmakers more than playing compelling characters. In the last 15 years, he has been directed by Spike Lee, Jim Jarmusch, Ridley Scott, Noah Baumbach, Michael Mann, Martin Scorsese, Clint Eastwood, The Coen Brothers, Steven Soderbourgh, Steven Spielberg, and now Coppola. That’s a resume that any actor would love to have.
    Coppola has been criticized in the past for his puzzling casting choices. Remember Keanu Reeves in Dracula or Sofia in Godfather 3? Adam Driver here seems like a major mistake. From the trailer, he just doesn’t compel so much as repel.

    • @chrislondo2683
      @chrislondo2683 Місяць тому +13

      Don’t forget J.J. Abrams and Rian Johnson.

    • @vinnym5607
      @vinnym5607 Місяць тому +7

      Yes and he thinks it's his road to an Oscar.

    • @ManFrancisco
      @ManFrancisco Місяць тому +22

      He has been great in almost all of those films and I would say most of those performances were compelling characters.

    • @andresbecerra1183
      @andresbecerra1183 Місяць тому +12

      To be fair, Winona Ryder was set to play that character, but had to drop out very close to production, so Coppola chose to cast his daughter instead.

    • @luchomscyfy
      @luchomscyfy Місяць тому +4

      @@chrislondo2683 Those aren't great filmakers. Or even acomplished.....

  • @belkitoFUERTE
    @belkitoFUERTE Місяць тому +141

    The critics will say, “Megaflopalis.”

    • @vinnym5607
      @vinnym5607 Місяць тому +2

      If they haven't already.

    • @onshnrisk
      @onshnrisk Місяць тому +1

      Megalopolis has received great review by serious critics. 4 stars in Cahiers du cinema. Rave reviews in New York Times and by both (!) film critics in The New Yorker. Five stars by the respected French cinema journal Critikat. But yes, it has received bad reviews from people who prefer movies to just be entertainment and who don't want to challenge themselves.

    • @stephenpmurphy591
      @stephenpmurphy591 Місяць тому +2

      ​@@onshnriskChallenge how?
      Silly embarrassing writing, silly embarrassing acting, silly embarrassing CGI?
      That type of challenge?

    • @mambaforever9593
      @mambaforever9593 Місяць тому +5

      ​@@onshnrisk the movie is ass, you are not a philosopher or a deep thinker bro

    • @onshnrisk
      @onshnrisk Місяць тому +1

      @@stephenpmurphy591 The fact that you (as a supposed adult?) even think "embarrassing CGI" [sic] is a criteria to evaluate a movie tells me you don't like any sort of challenging form in art. You are aware that not all art needs to be naturalist? Movies are not fashion, where the latest fads need to be used.

  • @800Ms-k6n
    @800Ms-k6n Місяць тому +146

    I knew that a lot of people might disliked this movie but calling it the worst movie of the year? Even worse than Borderlands and Madame Web? That's certainly....... something 😅

    • @Jingles6466
      @Jingles6466 Місяць тому +88

      I'll take ego driven auteur disaster over soulless IP safe cashgrab any day of the week

    • @mzzy03
      @mzzy03 Місяць тому +24

      Tbf at least there are some great visuals in Megalopolis

    • @joser1853
      @joser1853 Місяць тому +20

      Honestly, Borderlands and Madame Web have a better script than this.

    • @branagain
      @branagain Місяць тому

      @@Jingles6466I so agree

    • @800Ms-k6n
      @800Ms-k6n Місяць тому +3

      @@Jingles6466 Comparing Francis Ford Coppola to that is such a huge stretch 😅

  • @ManorHQ
    @ManorHQ Місяць тому +19

    When 1 of the 3 positives is "the opening logo" you know you're in trouble.

  • @singstreetcar5881
    @singstreetcar5881 Місяць тому +87

    He has the same problem with katy perry.
    Nobody on his team or his inner circle is advising him. They left him to do whatever he liked and this is the outcome.
    Shame this is his final movie
    Ending ur film making career with such a terrible movie like this is a shame.

    •  Місяць тому +3

      The fact that Katy already reached that point of her career at only 40 years old...

    • @thebigbadart
      @thebigbadart Місяць тому +2

      Comparing Francis Ford Coppola to Katy Perry 😂😂😂 Hilarious but I get it.

    • @Woozy.0
      @Woozy.0 Місяць тому +1

      ​@@thebigbadart Katy deserves so much better

    • @stephenpmurphy591
      @stephenpmurphy591 Місяць тому +4

      Because Grandpa Francis was paying them millions & hundreds of thousands out of his own pocket.
      Have you seen clips of grandpa sexuallly harassing extras during filming.
      In coming lawsuits.

    • @STNKbone
      @STNKbone Місяць тому +1

      @@stephenpmurphy591 that's been debunked ages ago as gossip from"anonymous sources". Just muckraking from the industry. The extra even came forward and said nothing happened.

  • @ramakblog
    @ramakblog Місяць тому +17

    I also looked at my watch and was shocked it was only an hour in. What a struggle to make it through this pretentious mess.

  • @Archivist82
    @Archivist82 Місяць тому +35

    14:35 - sounds like what Jerry Lewis did with The Day the Clown Cried. He was so embarrassed he locked it away. Library of Congress received a copy after his death but it’s still under lock and key. It’s had a huge mystique about it though!

    • @Calers-gu1ib
      @Calers-gu1ib Місяць тому

      That's if you think this reactor is correct, or even the possibility he isn't on a payroll to say "crap!"

  • @jacques2659
    @jacques2659 Місяць тому +27

    I find it odd that it seems no film reviews seem to understand what "a fable" subtitle means. The acting is intentionally disingenuous. The story is intentionally idealistic and unreal. That is the thematic style. Similar to Atlas Shrugged, where characters will spend 5 pages saying an idealistic rant -that is intentional. No human talks like that - that is intentionally used as a thematic device. It's been done in literature and stage plays for decades. It isn't as common in films, but it isn't difficult to understand the concept. I had many issues with this movie, but the common complaints in this review and all the other reviews I've seen simply don't seem to intellectually understand the basic style. I have issues with the substance, but there is nothing wrong with the film using a fable style.

    • @michaelroseagain
      @michaelroseagain Місяць тому +2

      💯 x 💯 x 💯

    • @drctrs
      @drctrs Місяць тому +4

      @@jacques2659 if he intended for this movie to be as pathetic as it is and spent his entire fortune on it, this was a pretty expensive experiment, yes, but so be it. One point though, I’ve seen movie “fables” before, and this is a really unconventional and highbrow approach to make a filmmaking statement, but I’ve never seen anyone, thematically, as you say, making a fable that, at the same time, stylistically is a Hollywood movie. If it was an indie movie, it would be understandable, but if you try to shoot a tentpole and a didactic poem at the same time, this is what you get.

    • @ricardocantoral7672
      @ricardocantoral7672 Місяць тому

      ​@@drctrs Only Hollywood in terms of budget.

    • @forgottenpath5919
      @forgottenpath5919 Місяць тому +5

      So, what you're saying is all fables are good? FFC fails his own assignment. The tone of the film is wildly uneven. What's fable-like about a drearily extended montage of a character being drunk and stoned out of his mind? And that's just one example. FFC is all over the map and not in control of the material. It's unfocused, emotionally flat and laughably pretentious.

    • @jacques2659
      @jacques2659 Місяць тому +1

      I am not defending this as a “good movie”! I really didn’t care for it, and I doubt I’ll ever watch it again. There are decisions made - like the extended drug sequence - that are uneven. And personally, I simply cannot look past the godawful 2000s Sci-Fi Channel CGI and aesthetic. The use of surrealism - like the hospital scene - is some of the worst surrealism since the 2000s “The Fountain“ era, which I loathe with passion. I am not calling this a good movie…
      What I AM saying is there is a general literary style being used that critics don’t seem to understand (probably because they don’t read literature). The main takeaway from reviews like this one are taking issue with the valid “fable” style that is used in traditional literature like Ayn Rand and Camus, and recently by Daniel Kehlmann. “The actors weren’t convincing” is a common complaint - but that is the stylistic point! “The story is uneven” - that is a key structure of fables. “The plot reveals were dumb and silly” - that is literally the defining characteristic of allegorical literature. All of the criticism that these UA-cam reviews are pointing to are arguing against the genre of writing this film uses. It’s like going to a Western and complaining “there’s too much desert and shootouts!” My point is - this criticism is uneducated. They simply are not educated in literary genre, and probably shouldn’t be reviewing films with a higher level of thought than Marvel films.
      Again - Metropolis isn’t a good movie. I am not saying that. But anyone engaging in criticism should at least be educated in the premise of what they’re reviewing, which these types of videos clearly are not.

  • @geebyleo
    @geebyleo Місяць тому +5

    I didnt even finish the movie. The theater felt like a prison watching it.

  • @jonahfalcon1970
    @jonahfalcon1970 Місяць тому +12

    Roger Ebert said, “No good movie is too long and no bad movie is short enough.”

    • @Calers-gu1ib
      @Calers-gu1ib Місяць тому +1

      No "one reactor" is too right. Other reactors praised it.

    • @CelestialWoodway
      @CelestialWoodway Місяць тому

      @@Calers-gu1ib Go watch it and let us know what you think.

    • @rustincohle2135
      @rustincohle2135 28 днів тому +1

      @@Calers-gu1ib Yea, a very small minority. But so what? That happens with every movie.

  • @deaconfrost6229
    @deaconfrost6229 Місяць тому +20

    Well, he's 85 (84 while filming this), so he's definitely not the same man that made The Godfather.

    • @Ldv1969cts5
      @Ldv1969cts5 Місяць тому +6

      No this is karma for him. I saw Godfather on opening night. Very good. However, he never gave Bob Evans the love he deserved for REALLY editing it and backing a longer cut. Evans also was instrumental in ensuring Godfather 2 was made. Then on the 50th anniversary at the Oscars - after Evans had passed away He finally thanked him. If it had not been Evans approving Francis as the director and fighting with Gulf and Western on Coppola’s vision, who knows if Francis would have even been widely known. Think what you want about Evans, but my Uncle told me that had not Evans re edited it after Francis cut some of the best scenes it would not have been the masterpiece it is considered today. Instead Francis stabbed Evans in the back and now this mess of a movie he is getting the payback for what he did to a lot of people in the past. He has the most overblown ego out there. As a fellow Sicilian as my dad’s parents came over and went through Ellis Island, I am quite aware how they can be. And Coppola is the epitome of that. Sad, but true. As Evans said there is your remembering how it went down, Ruddy’s memories and Coppola’s and somewhere in the three tellings is the truth and no one is lying. So yeah, you can’t idolize these directors - there are many people involved in making a great movie. And he should have retired gracefully because he only has really three good movies to his name and succumbed to all the hype and believed he was the best director and whined if someone questioned it. As a fellow Sicilian I have no empathy for him at all. Too bad there was no Evans on this film to tell him No, it’s a pretentious ego inflated passion project and an unmitigated mess. Multiple Razzies not Oscars coming his way. And Apocalypse Now is highly overrated. I take Full Metal Jacket, The Deer Hunter and Platoon over that meandering mess any day.

    • @jhoughjr1
      @jhoughjr1 Місяць тому +1

      Well that wqs like 50 years ago.
      Regardlesa of talent noone hits home runs forever

    • @fleurdelotusrosecam38
      @fleurdelotusrosecam38 Місяць тому

      ⁠@@Ldv1969cts5Thanks for the interesting information and your take. After seeing Paramount’s “the Offer”, I got curious about the real Bob Evans and read quite a few articles written about him, and actually felt bad for the guy, even if he may not have been a saint either. So what you’ve said makes sense and I believe it. I’m an Asian American but have had quite a few Italian American friends growing up including a few exes, and I can kind of see what you’re referring to about the ego factor, that I’d associate with some kind of ethnic/cultural pride. I actually see the same in some people of my own ancestry, particularity men, and when you look back into history, it all makes more sense.

    • @Calers-gu1ib
      @Calers-gu1ib Місяць тому

      This the first one that I've seen that didn't like it on the scale this guy did it so I'll go by the majority and go to form my own opinion.

  • @feedyourhead434
    @feedyourhead434 Місяць тому +17

    "I loved the opening logo" omg THE SHADE

  • @Bobmacca64
    @Bobmacca64 Місяць тому +34

    So that's what Tarantino meant when he said he wanted to make 10 movies and not one to many, so that his career will not end with a massive dud:)

    • @lymphomasurvive
      @lymphomasurvive Місяць тому +3

      It wasn't a dud, the critics just didn't get it.

    • @mambaforever9593
      @mambaforever9593 Місяць тому +1

      ​@@lymphomasurvive i don't see you explaining it, only crying about others not getting it under every comment. What is good about it?

    • @lymphomasurvive
      @lymphomasurvive Місяць тому +2

      @mambaforever9593 Maybe I didn't post it here. This is what I wrote. I saw the movie last night and thought the movie had a clear and coherent structure that many critics didn’t seem to understand. It’s a mixture of an Aesop fable with the magical realism of Latin American literature. I didn’t see anything that was unclear. In interviews, Adam Driver said the film leaves you open to interpret it but that’s not the nature of fables, which are moralistic by nature; the movie had a clear message. At the start of the movie, Catalina is probably in the middle of psychosis, and I think some of the things we see, like the moving statues in the drive, can be seen in that manner. I didn’t find the monologues preachy or out of place in the context they were given. It also helps to review the Catilinarian conspiracy right before the fall of the Roman Republic.

    • @vins1979
      @vins1979 Місяць тому

      ​@@lymphomasurviveI agree with you.

    • @vins1979
      @vins1979 Місяць тому +4

      Funny that Tarantino says that, since I think his last good movie was Inglorious Basterds, which came out 15 years ago. (Sorry, not a fan of Django Unchained, The Hateful Eight, and Once upon a time in Hollywood, which is a pretentious snooze fest)

  • @eddiechase305
    @eddiechase305 Місяць тому +28

    I will say, though, that despite being a swing and a miss, he tried something and it failed. We NEED different movies/diverse movies as opposed to just superhero movies. Granted, it puts people in the seats, but there needs to be more original, creative stories. Sadly, this was bad but I fear that this might put a nail in the coffin for a lot of low-budget films that don't involve masks/capes/family animation films that don't go by A24 or Pixar or Disney to have a decent box office.

    • @klarn99
      @klarn99 Місяць тому +10

      This wasn’t a low budget movie and this has nothing to do with superhero movies. There are plenty of original movies out there, if people don’t go watch them that’s on the general public.

    • @STNKbone
      @STNKbone Місяць тому +2

      it failed... to you. But Megalopolis was entirely self funded and had no studio involvement outside of the limited theatrical distribution. Coppola even paid for the marketing. The fact that this singular creative vision of a film got made at all is a success in itself.

    • @bigbearkat2010
      @bigbearkat2010 Місяць тому +2

      @@STNKbone made possible by him having an assload of money, dare to dream kids. I also don't think him paying for the marketing is a flex considering how embarrassingly bad it was.

    • @Calers-gu1ib
      @Calers-gu1ib Місяць тому

      Swung and miss if you believe this guy. To me he went way overboard so I don't.

  • @bigbonez9160
    @bigbonez9160 7 днів тому +1

    This review is the epitome of the phrase "I'm not mad, I'm just disappointed".

  • @CelestialWoodway
    @CelestialWoodway Місяць тому +3

    Okay so out of morbid curiosity I went and saw Francis Ford Coppola's Megalopolis. It's pretty much a mess as if Coppola is now like a Tommy Wiseau (The Room) bad director. LOL I give him some credit for being 85 years old and following his own vision; I think a glimmer of a good movie is in there if maybe someone had challenged Coppola on some of his decisions and edited it down. Aubrey Plaza is one of the highlights of the film and she looks fantastic as a blonde in this I must say. Aubrey plays a gold digger who marries a rich guy for his money and power, her character is smart and ambitious and she actually has a career as a TV journalist. Shi LaBeouf dresses in drag in the film. Adam Driver is good in this also but he needs to pick better roles in the future. A lot of good actors are in this actually; the direction and story falls flat. It could have been great if Coppola had made this 40 years ago or so. I'd probably give it like 2 1/2 stars out of five. Oh yeah there is one disturbing scene where Shia LeBeouf performs oral sex on Aubrey Plaza; she isn't attracted to him she is just manipulating him for money and power. That guy always gives a creepy performance. If anyone is curious I would wait for streaming on this one. It's pretty slow and not a lot of action. It's not the worst movie I have ever seen but I believe most people would not like it. You can bet on that.

  • @albalbuena6478
    @albalbuena6478 Місяць тому +15

    I thought that Adam Driver was awful in the horrible HOUSE OF GUCCI. He slept walked through that entire movie.

    • @paulinha2969
      @paulinha2969 Місяць тому +6

      He was awful, the rest of the cast and the movie

    • @stxrstrxckmxteo515
      @stxrstrxckmxteo515 Місяць тому +2

      yeah….the more time passes the worse that movie ages. Gaga’s hair was so distractingly bad, none of the cast had an accent that made sense, Salma Hayek, as much as I love her, was miscast and made no sense for that role, it was just kind of a pointless movie that I really didn’t care for

    • @Calers-gu1ib
      @Calers-gu1ib Місяць тому

      So you believe this guy. I saw other reactors say Adam is really good in this.

  • @drctrs
    @drctrs Місяць тому +4

    Somehow it reminded me of Cloud Atlas with all those strange casting choices of top Hollywood stars appearing in what can be described as an essentially indie sci-fi movie, but on steroids. But, for Cloud Atlas, it worked, because the story was well adapted from a well written book by a professional writer.

  • @MCG2009-r6w
    @MCG2009-r6w Місяць тому +22

    I'm gonna be so mad if Francis Ford Coppola ends his career with this movie.

    • @andyroo9381
      @andyroo9381 Місяць тому +12

      I don't think there will be a chance at redemption for Coppola. This film is sooooo bad. I almost left the theatre, but remained respectful.

    • @CRM-114
      @CRM-114 Місяць тому +7

      He‘a already working on the next one

    • @nicholetheotter1957
      @nicholetheotter1957 Місяць тому +4

      Even better if he ends up nabbing Worst Director at the Razzies. He humiliated himself with this disaster of a movie.

    • @clownpendotfart
      @clownpendotfart Місяць тому +3

      Better than if he ended it with Twixt.

    • @qcrew2938
      @qcrew2938 Місяць тому +2

      Maybe he'll sell another winery and make a good film this time

  • @TPH7NS
    @TPH7NS Місяць тому +6

    Doesn't deserve any awards but God damn this was the most fun I've had in a theatre in awhile

  • @elizabethhughes3195
    @elizabethhughes3195 Місяць тому +21

    No, but how do you really feel about this film? I haven't laughed this hard during a review in a loooong time. Thanks for saving me time and money.

    • @lymphomasurvive
      @lymphomasurvive Місяць тому +1

      Read my comment in the main section. Don't let him do your thinking for you.

  • @fleurdelotusrosecam38
    @fleurdelotusrosecam38 Місяць тому +2

    Coppola is too old to be directing this film or any film. When you’ve reached that age, most people lose the sharper senses and flexibility of mind that they once had when they were younger, with a very few exceptions. Seems it’s only those who have taken a superb care of their health, led a rather well-intentioned life with many good deeds done for others (generating good karma), and are lucky, that seem to be able to produce good-quality creative work into their older age. Robert Redford is one such director/producer that comes to mind. He’s actually older than Coppola but still producing good films, he is also still extremely well-spoken and inspiring in interviews. And he was smart and wise enough to retire from directing years ago.
    Thanks for the review. I sometimes waste my time watching poor-rated films anyway out of mere curiosity of how bad it is, but I think seeing this video I’ll skip this one, and also the sequel to Joker, too, after seeing your review on it.

  • @VikingMatt879
    @VikingMatt879 Місяць тому +22

    I have not seen it yet, but it cannot be worse than Madame Web, or Sasquatch Sunset.

    • @andyroo9381
      @andyroo9381 Місяць тому +5

      It is pretty bad. Watched it on opening day. The only good thing about this film is seeing Adam Driver shirtless.

    • @bronsonbamnallen1633
      @bronsonbamnallen1633 Місяць тому +7

      Its not. Borderlands, Madame Web and Sasquatch Sunset are all worse

    • @chocolatewolfe
      @chocolatewolfe Місяць тому +4

      It felt unwatchable in the two attempts I made to finish it. I could not keep my eyes open.

  • @jonathann5205
    @jonathann5205 Місяць тому +3

    It was so awful. I had to leave the theatre. No coherent story, dialogue or unified theme. Felt narratively epileptic 😆

  • @fangal12
    @fangal12 Місяць тому +23

    Marriage Story bought Adam Driver a lot of good will for me, so I won't hold this terrible movie against him. I think these legendary directors get to a point where they no longer keep the audience in mind. It's all about their vision and because of their position no one will tell them no

    • @vinnym5607
      @vinnym5607 Місяць тому +9

      I think the problem with Adam Driver is he wants an Oscar and thinks that working with a bunch of older, white male directors, no matter what the project is the trick that will work.
      "Ferrari" is fine, though, but he's badly cast.

    • @lymphomasurvive
      @lymphomasurvive Місяць тому +1

      It's a good movie that flows well and is easily understood.

    • @ricardocantoral7672
      @ricardocantoral7672 Місяць тому

      ​@@lymphomasurvive Agreed. I don't understand why people don't get this film is a political essay that reflects our time. I admit I didn't pick up on the meaning of all the imagery but I found it to be the most engaging cinematic experience, in terms of Hollywood, I have had in many years. I am going to see it again.

    • @lymphomasurvive
      @lymphomasurvive Місяць тому

      @ricardocantoral7672 I thought the movie was a long exploration of love on every level and from every side, and it is played on top of a retelling and twisting of an actual historical event. It showed the ugliness and beauty of love. There was grief, jealousy, sex as a weapon on the negative side. Catalina was in the middle of psychosis in the first half of the movie, but he was also an indifferent and uncaring; the visuals in the first half can be seen through the lens of his psychosis. We don’t see how Platinum falls in love with Catalina but we know how that drives her anger and jealousy; which is how Pulcher responds to rejection. It was love that redeemed him and the second half of the movie was how that happened. Beyond the personal love, the movie explores love through the lens of family and civics to the love of humanity and all beings. As love refines Catalina, he starts to care more about other people. The movie as a whole can be seen through the lens of a fable with magical realism. As a fable, it has a clear moral message. The structure was coherent and clear. For the historical events, the scandal with the Vestal virgin happened with the real Catalina being accused of trying to sleep with one, which was a potential death sentence. The Coliseum scene with the virgin also speaks to love misused, her virginity was being put up for sale. I also think the historical Catalina is split into two characters - the cousins portrayed by Driver, who is the superego, and Labeouf, who is the id. But Driver starts off with his id and superego fighting from the grief of the loss of his wife. Coppola subverted both fables and the ending of the real conspiracy. Rome became a dictatorship. And part of the point of the movie is we can't make it on our own. Love is what brought him out of the madness.

  • @PooleyX
    @PooleyX Місяць тому +5

    I feel certain there will be a movie made about this movie in the next few years.

    • @matthewmatt5285
      @matthewmatt5285 29 днів тому

      It felt almost like he was "Punking" the audience is was so terrible,.lol~

  • @GlennKramer
    @GlennKramer Місяць тому +3

    It sounds like a movie nobody is going to want to see twice.

  • @ethancampa3855
    @ethancampa3855 Місяць тому +2

    I just read somewhere that "Megalopolis makes Southland Tales look like an episode of Friends" LOL

  • @brianj436
    @brianj436 Місяць тому +23

    Who's gonna tell Coppola, Costner and Ridley that they're past it.

    • @michaelroseagain
      @michaelroseagain Місяць тому +1

      Costner never had it. Ridley’s Napoleon was better than any other. And FFC has just made a masterpiece that people can’t see, yet. Just like the Mayor, you need trust and new eyes to see.

    • @MILDMONSTER1234
      @MILDMONSTER1234 Місяць тому +1

      ​@@michaelroseagain Ridley is the most hit or miss director in the business lol. For every American Gangster Or The Martian we get a Robin Hood or Exodus

  • @wrh41
    @wrh41 Місяць тому +28

    Dry Brian: “Aubrey Plaza plays a character named WOW PLATINUM. That is her name in this movie, WOW PLATINUM.” 😂

    • @grantc61
      @grantc61 Місяць тому +4

      Described by another critic as "the kind of name a writer in his 80s would give a wild character".

    • @mstavros96
      @mstavros96 Місяць тому +3

      It's a stage name and even the movie makes fun of how ridiculous it is.

    • @vinnym5607
      @vinnym5607 Місяць тому +1

      It's so disappointing to hear she's so bad on this. It's like Coppola is trying to help his old cancelled friends (he bagged about this in the press) while hurting the careers of some younger stars.

    • @vins1979
      @vins1979 Місяць тому

      I don't understand what's the problem with a character whose stage name is Wow Platinum. I really don't understand.

    • @michaelroseagain
      @michaelroseagain Місяць тому

      Everyone who says this can’t see that Aubrey Plaza is also a really stoopid name.

  • @roberttrebor7097
    @roberttrebor7097 Місяць тому +4

    Read Sam Wasson's book Path To Paradise for perspective on this. It had been germinating in Coppola for 40 years. He spent 110 million dollars of his own money to get his heart and soul on the screen. I admire his courage. He sees a parallel to the fall of the Roman Empire and America today. I want to see Megadoc, a documentary by Mike Figgis about the making of Megalopolis.

  • @lucindabolinger6360
    @lucindabolinger6360 Місяць тому +3

    It was worth seeing.

  • @friendlypup5650
    @friendlypup5650 Місяць тому +9

    All I could think in the first 20 minutes was “so this is what an ai film would look like”

    • @STNKbone
      @STNKbone Місяць тому +1

      lol sure an idiosyncratic film financed and creatively controlled by a single guy is what an AI film would look like, not the superhero slop the studios keep pumping out.

    • @friendlypup5650
      @friendlypup5650 Місяць тому

      @@STNKbonesuperhero slop is more competent than whatever this was

  • @joelanthonylim6792
    @joelanthonylim6792 Місяць тому +9

    After seeing the movie they gave us a free sample tasting of Coppola's chardonnay outside which is exactly what I needed after I saw the movie lol
    Ironically the best parts of the movie were the clips montage where he goes full Terrence Mallick
    I still would rank Borderlands, Am I Racist and The Crow worse than this though

  • @alienlovearts
    @alienlovearts Місяць тому +4

    Cinema used to mean something and not box office bankability. We used to make space for art films in the conversation. Now that conversation has shrunk to the size of a cell phone. We live in a highly polarized society where every piece of entertainment, stylistically resembles the next, all equally forgettable. Then, once in a blue moon a film comes along that does not fit into conventions or popular tastes. Give it a year or two, or ten and let it ruminate. Perhaps Megalopolis is so hated because it hits so close to the mark of where society is truly at, and what is at stake.

    • @vins1979
      @vins1979 Місяць тому +1

      I agree with you 100%. The hand that takes the Moon and the woman that dissolves into many different bodies are images that will remain with me forever.

  • @fajarsetiawan8665
    @fajarsetiawan8665 Місяць тому +2

    So this is what Reverend Mother Mohiam when she said, "abomination!!!". This film is indeed abhorrent

  • @SCL8294
    @SCL8294 Місяць тому +38

    Francis Ford Coppola is a very morally questionable person. Everyone should research the Nathan Forrest Winters/Victor Salva situation from the late 80s.

    • @mavensbaseball
      @mavensbaseball Місяць тому +2

      This is interesting, why do you say this?

    • @MarcoPiazzo
      @MarcoPiazzo Місяць тому

      ​@@mavensbaseballBecause he's a pedo apologista.

    • @randomcenturion7264
      @randomcenturion7264 Місяць тому

      Mavensbaseball- He infamously defended convicted pedo Victor Salva and made sure Nathan, his victim never “worked in this business again” for speaking out.
      Sick fuck even tried to say Salva, a 30 year man, was “Just a child himself.”

    • @littleblackpistol
      @littleblackpistol Місяць тому

      @@mavensbaseball Coppola's production company was instrumental in supporting convicted pedophile rapist Victor Salva (who raped a twelve year old actor Nathan Forrest Winters) to return to directing the Jeepers Creepers franchaise.

    • @jondstewart
      @jondstewart Місяць тому

      I saw that movie he made in the early 1990’s on HBO called Clownhouse and was wondering like WTH! Why is he showing all this? Then I heard accusations about the director years later when he made Powder and not surprised.
      So how does Francis Coppola compare? Only controversy I ever heard about him was when he was filming Gardens of Stone and a cast member of it was fired because he was in a boating accident with his son that killed him.

  • @WellingtonOliveira_well_author
    @WellingtonOliveira_well_author Місяць тому +27

    The way Megalopolis will open in the domestic box office behind a movie from another country will put Coppola's ego in its right place 🤭

    • @vinnym5607
      @vinnym5607 Місяць тому

      Probably behind a lot of movies!

    • @nicholetheotter1957
      @nicholetheotter1957 Місяць тому +2

      He’s suffering from Katy Perry Syndrome. Refuses to adapt for the next generation and the trends that are lining up with said generation.

  • @michaelnovellino9448
    @michaelnovellino9448 Місяць тому +2

    WORST MOVIE EVER!!! First time I ever walked out of a movie before it ended !!! Truly BAD!!! NOTHING WAS GOOD ABOUT THIS FILM..........

  • @alaricboyle-poirier6931
    @alaricboyle-poirier6931 Місяць тому +7

    I really liked the movie! It's much better than critics want you to think.

  • @user-io5sc6tn6e
    @user-io5sc6tn6e Місяць тому +18

    To each their own and you can not like this movie, but this was pretty lazy criticism. This is far from the worst movie of the year and saying this seems like the work of an amateur is laughable. Shit like this is why internet film criticism is losing most of, if not all credibility.

    • @vins1979
      @vins1979 Місяць тому +5

      Overall, I think Brian is not a good critic at all. Actually, he's not a critic, full stop. I enjoy listening to him talking about Oscars and stuff, but this is it. All of his criticisms are pretty lazy, as when he said that Guadagnino's Queer is a letdown because he was expecting a kind of Call me by your name or A single man movie and Queer was anything but. The problem is not with Brian's lazy criticisms because, as I said, he is not a critic (and it shows). (It's also very likely that he doesn't care what his followers think, given the very low engagement he shows in terms of replies in the comment section.) The problem is with all the (allegedly) 'professional reviewers' who even fail to grasp the basic plot of Megalopolis -- which is pretty straightforward and classicaly structured. Honestly, we are at a point where viewers, even 'professional' viewers, do not even understand what they are watching!

    • @michaelroseagain
      @michaelroseagain Місяць тому +2

      @@vins1979well said

    • @ricardocantoral7672
      @ricardocantoral7672 Місяць тому +2

      This guy keeps making these laughable absolute statements. "We don't care, there are non-characters, it doesn't reach the audience," What is this guy? The unquestionable Czar of film?

    • @vins1979
      @vins1979 Місяць тому +2

      @@ricardocantoral7672 yeah, well, I noticed that UA-camrs tend to develop a very big ego. Like, they become 'experts' or something, whereas everybody else, from their perspective, is just an illiterate idiot. Being able to shoot a video with their phone in their room does not make them professional critics though.

    • @excalibur2024guy
      @excalibur2024guy Місяць тому +6

      This guy is saying the movie is bad and saying why. You're just saying it's not that bad. How about explaining why?

  • @EdB-o3j
    @EdB-o3j 29 днів тому +4

    Couldn't agree more with this revie. I saw it a couple of days ago. I tried to stay away from reviews that were negative but I did go into this film with low expectations. I saw it because it was directed by Francis Ford Coppola. He's made some great films so I tried to go in with an open mind. Unfortunately, Megalopolis is by far his worst film. It was embarrassingly bad. I don't understand how he spent 40 years trying to make this and this is what he put out? Almost every performance is bad. It's not even " it's so bad it's good " territory. I admire a filmmaker that takes chances but Coppola truly wasted his time and money on this. It seems it's all ego for him. The 140 minutes of this film felt like 4!!! The last Coppola film that I saw that was interesting was Tetro. Coppola has always fancied himself as an independent auteur but sometimes his ambition hurts his films. This man has made some great films and I hope this isn't his last one but this is by far the worst film I've seen this year!!!

  • @quiet_erp
    @quiet_erp Місяць тому +20

    It was the worst movie going experience I have ever had. I was miserable. About 40 minutes in you realize it isn't going to get any better and your left for nearly another 2 hours with a false sense of hope that something will happen to turn things around. It never does. By the end you will be just begging for it to end so you can go about your business. It was artsy fartsy nonsense. I honestly hated every minute of it. I've never felt so disconnected from something I was wanting and trying so hard to get into.

    • @redfacegaming7727
      @redfacegaming7727 Місяць тому +5

      Damn I absolutely loved it. It commanded my complete attention the entire run time

    • @ricardocantoral7672
      @ricardocantoral7672 Місяць тому +2

      ​Same here.

    • @quiet_erp
      @quiet_erp Місяць тому +2

      @@redfacegaming7727 just out of curiosity what was your favorite "part"?

    • @redfacegaming7727
      @redfacegaming7727 Місяць тому +3

      @quiet_erp Adam Driver and Shia LaBeouf's performances. I love it when directors allow actors to follow their instincts and just go for it. The tone of the movie was right up my alley. Coppola and most of the actors come across as being earnest to me in their intentions. My least favorite part was the actress who played opposite Adam Driver. She was monotone and didn't have the confidence of Aubrey Plaza or LaBeouf.

    • @quiet_erp
      @quiet_erp Місяць тому +2

      @@redfacegaming7727 right on. We'll I'm glad you enjoyed it. Different strokes for different folks I guess.

  • @sparkleypegs8350
    @sparkleypegs8350 Місяць тому +4

    I love Adam Driver, but the artsy/boring movies he chooses do nothing for him.

    • @bluevol1976
      @bluevol1976 Місяць тому

      What are your thoughts of that marriage movie with Scar Jo?

  • @ryanking8227
    @ryanking8227 Місяць тому +2

    My review: (B) While its narrative is nowhere near perfect and can often get confusing, Megalopolis at least has great visuals, excellent costumes and an amazing cast.

  • @clownpendotfart
    @clownpendotfart Місяць тому +3

    Having seen Coppola's previous three films a month ago, I can definitively say that Twixt was worse. It really does come across as inept as people accuse Megalopolis of being (which I thought was odd but not so amateurish). Tetro was a better-made film than Twixt, but I regarded as a worse watch because it was so dull, and I still think of it as duller than Megalopolis. Youth Without Youth could rank higher because he was adapting someone else's magical realist story rather than just writing his own original script (the worst aspect of Megalopolis). I expect he's much happier to have this as his final film than Twixt.

  • @onshnrisk
    @onshnrisk Місяць тому +2

    I like people who claim they are Coppola fans but only talk about movies he made 50 years ago. This reviewer proclaims "this doesn't feel like the work of Francis Ford Coppola". Maybe if you actually saw some of his films you'd discover that this is the style that he has developed the last 20 years. Watch Tetro, Twixt and his masterful Youth Without Youth. If you don't like that style that's fine, but don't chain him to a style he had 50 years ago and that he has since abandoned.

  • @Gary-xs6ex
    @Gary-xs6ex Місяць тому +20

    THIS….is the kind of criticism I LOVE!!! True, heartfelt and soul crushing!!!👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾💐💐💐💐❤️❤️❤️

  • @nealwriter
    @nealwriter Місяць тому +15

    Disastrous films by well-respected directors seems to be a trend right now: Bardo, Babylon, Napoleon, and now Megalopolis.

    • @ZlatanHu.
      @ZlatanHu. Місяць тому +3

      Those films are masterpiece when compared to this trainwreck. This is whole other level of disastrous 😖

    • @vinnym5607
      @vinnym5607 Місяць тому

      ​@@ZlatanHu. I feel like this is a whole new level, though.

    • @bronsonbamnallen1633
      @bronsonbamnallen1633 Місяць тому +1

      I like that you said what I was thinking. Bardo was such a piece of shit from Inarritu I am still pissed at him. All those movies were industrial sized dunpsters compared to their typical work

    • @medou2161
      @medou2161 Місяць тому +3

      Bardo is excellent, Babylon is a masterpiece and Megalopolis is also a major work.

    • @Hildelano73
      @Hildelano73 Місяць тому

      @@medou2161 lololol are u nut????

  • @chimpinaneckbrace
    @chimpinaneckbrace Місяць тому +7

    That's why he's the king of nepotism. Surround yourself with family and friends and any outsider who disagrees with you can always be replaced with a cousin or something.

    • @michaelroseagain
      @michaelroseagain Місяць тому +1

      Why not? It’s his money. Hollywood has its own New Rome Nepotisms. Variety et al suck up to Hollywood (like Wow sucks up to Crassus) and Coppola (Caesar) refuse to play the old game as Hollywood is dying before our eyes.

  • @barry4649
    @barry4649 Місяць тому +1

    This movie was brilliant. Criticising anything that’s ambitious in trying something different or weird in an over the top manner isn’t the way to go either and is a big reason why studios take little to no risks and pump out millions of sequels to popular franchises every year instead of investing in good scripts and ideas. This film has plenty to criticise but calling it the worst of the year when there’s been many terrible films this year is very disingenuous. I loved it and am going to see it again

  • @e.h.v.k.7404
    @e.h.v.k.7404 Місяць тому +2

    Nah, it was great! You gotta embrace the weirdness of it all. It had super unique tone and at the times I almost felt like I was watching totally new genre of cinema, though that makes it sound smarter than it is. But that’s the thing: It is kinda like at the same time really stupid and crazy, but also smart. And I think that’s intentional. It's like megalomaniac art film. And It’s really funny too! All in all very interesting film and I truly think we need more films like these in the theaters. Films that polarize viewers by taking risks and doing what the heck they want.

  • @stevenblack7928
    @stevenblack7928 Місяць тому +2

    Adam Driver always sleepwalks through movies, he is the most boring A list actor

    • @matthewmatt5285
      @matthewmatt5285 29 днів тому +1

      Agreed,...That space movie he did (Not Star Wars) was equally atrocious and un-memorable,..Yuck~

    • @xoxo20000
      @xoxo20000 27 днів тому +3

      I've never liked him and I think he's super overrated. Like, I don't get the hype. He also doesn't have any charm or charisma on screen. Really baffled by who Hollywood chooses for their new "stars" today.

    • @stevenblack7928
      @stevenblack7928 27 днів тому

      @@xoxo20000 That is how Hollywood operates nowadays I am afraid, blend generic movies, blend generic actors

  • @victore3053
    @victore3053 Місяць тому +1

    *Best Comedy of the Year*

  • @rjg7112
    @rjg7112 Місяць тому +1

    Yes, definitely in the running for multiple Razzies. It’s like Coppola’s 45 year hang over from making “Apocalypse Now”.
    The good news here is Kylo Ren becomes a father, and I’m happy for him.

  • @michaelroseagain
    @michaelroseagain Місяць тому +2

    6:23 “obviously we know”. And FFC knows we know. So, you’ve heard of Bertold Brecht’s fourth wall? This. Is. That.

    • @BobSmith-g4b
      @BobSmith-g4b Місяць тому +1

      "Berthold Brecht- was he on Andy Cohen last night?"
      LOL. I can almost guarantee he has no idea who Brecht was

  • @USER.EXE.YOUTUBE
    @USER.EXE.YOUTUBE Місяць тому +2

    Worst movie of 2024? Clearly you haven't seen madame web

  • @danielaou
    @danielaou Місяць тому +5

    Never imagined me saying this but maybe Coppola should have taken some notes from Brady Corbet

  • @badluckboy1
    @badluckboy1 Місяць тому +6

    i know it's going to be bad when the first poster was released... what a horrible poster that was.

  • @LH-gp6xb
    @LH-gp6xb Місяць тому +1

    Just saw it last night. Tbh it's not as bad as I'd expected, but it's a failure for sure.
    Coppola had the idea of making it in 70s. Just imagine if this had been completed back then, it might not have been a success but it could've potentially reached a cult status.
    I think the reason why it fails epically is because Coppola's cinematic styles and aesthetics still stuck in the past. Moments in this film made me feel like I've seen similar stuffs from other indie filmmakers decades ago, and yet Megalopolis is infused with those 'comparatively more modern' and gimmicky special effects and narrative style, which make the whole thing worse. It feels like an elder man trying to embrace new concepts and stuff but ends up putting himself in a rather awkward position: still belonging to the past, but looking at the present and the future mostly through his old lens.
    However, I do think the script isn't that bad and could be more suitable for different forms of art , such as stage play or maybe an anime? I'm not joking about the latter. In anime, imagination runs wilder than ever. Picturing this if those Ghibli's masterpieces are made into live-actions, I guess 99% of them would end up becoming a huge disaster.

  • @LolliPop2000
    @LolliPop2000 Місяць тому +1

    "This is it. This is the one I'll be remembered for." --Ed Wood Jr.

  • @NPC8474
    @NPC8474 Місяць тому +6

    An absolute masterpiece.

  • @GareBare90
    @GareBare90 Місяць тому +5

    The face says it all...CAN'T WAIT TO WATCH IT!

  • @wsidechris
    @wsidechris Місяць тому +5

    He’s got his vineyards. Coppola wines are usually good for the price. So there’s that. I won’t be surprised if they increase their wine distribution to help cover the expenses of this film’s distribution.

    • @robgabriel8900
      @robgabriel8900 Місяць тому +3

      reportedly, Coppola sold a portion of his winery in California to spend $120 million of his own money to fund it.

    • @wsidechris
      @wsidechris Місяць тому

      @@robgabriel8900 Oh dear, he needs that revenue!

    • @lymphomasurvive
      @lymphomasurvive Місяць тому +1

      ​@@wsidechrisThe movie was good.

    • @robgabriel8900
      @robgabriel8900 Місяць тому

      @@lymphomasurvive but was it worth spending 120mil of ones own money to make it...

    • @lymphomasurvive
      @lymphomasurvive Місяць тому

      @@robgabriel8900 He created his wine business from nothing and he still owns it. If he had spent that money on cocaine and hookers, he’d be getting less flak from spending it on a movie that won’t make anywhere near its money back in his lifetime, if ever.

  • @KevinTRod
    @KevinTRod Місяць тому +6

    Pretty strong disagreement on this one. My video review is going to be VERY different, and I think that this will become a classic as people re-evaluate it down the road (the same way "One from the Heart" was polarizing before it was embraced)! There is so much great stuff in this movie that IS a little messy (I won't argue there), but my God we rarely see such ambition on the screen these days, and considering the subtext of the story and what we are seeing in the political landscape today...I meant, sorry you didn't enjoy it, but I believe this is a masterpiece.

    • @vins1979
      @vins1979 Місяць тому

      Ehi, when is your video review coming out? I would like to watch it.

    • @KevinTRod
      @KevinTRod Місяць тому +1

      @@vins1979 Probably Friday.

    • @stxrstrxckmxteo515
      @stxrstrxckmxteo515 Місяць тому +2

      I loved Babylon and if this movie is anything like that I might actually watch it

    • @vins1979
      @vins1979 Місяць тому

      @@stxrstrxckmxteo515 well, nope, in my opinion Babylon is a great movie (and I will be waiting 10 or 20 years until it will be re-evaluated, so that I will be able to say that I loved it since day 1). Megalopolis is not as good as Babylos. Still, it's not an abomination and it's not a horrible mess like many people are saying.

    • @bigbearkat2010
      @bigbearkat2010 Місяць тому

      Just like how we all reevaluated Jack, The Rainmaker and Twixt

  • @lymphomasurvive
    @lymphomasurvive Місяць тому +10

    I thought the movie was a long exploration of love on every level and from every side, and it is played on top of a retelling and twisting of an actual historical event. It showed the ugliness and beauty of love. There was grief, jealousy, sex as a weapon on the negative side. Catalina was in the middle of psychosis in the first half of the movie, but he was also an indifferent and uncaring; the visuals in the first half can be seen through the lens of his psychosis. We don’t see how Platinum falls in love with Catalina but we know how that drives her anger and jealousy; which is how Pulcher responds to rejection. It was love that redeemed him and the second half of the movie was how that happened. Beyond the personal love, the movie explores love through the lens of family and civics to the love of humanity and all beings. As love refines Catalina, he starts to care more about other people. The movie as a whole can be seen through the lens of a fable with magical realism. As a fable, it has a clear moral message. The structure was coherent and clear. For the historical events, the scandal with the Vestal virgin happened with the real Catalina being accused of trying to sleep with one, which was a potential death sentence. The Coliseum scene with the virgin also speaks to love misused, her virginity was being put up for sale. I also think the historical Catalina is split into two characters - the cousins portrayed by Driver, who is the superego, and Labeouf, who is the id. But Driver starts off with his id and superego fighting from the grief of the loss of his wife. Coppola subverted both fables and the ending of the real conspiracy. Rome became a dictatorship. And part of the point of the movie is we can't make it on our own. Love is what brought him out of the madness.

    • @vins1979
      @vins1979 Місяць тому +2

      Finally someone who gets the movie --- which is not even so difficult to get to begin with, but people nowadays are becoming brainless...

    • @lymphomasurvive
      @lymphomasurvive Місяць тому +3

      @vins1979 I've only seen three reviewers get it and only one, Terry Talks Movies, mention the magic realism. I went into the movie with no expectations because everyone out of Cannes said it was saying it was a mess. How is it that so few get it? I can endorse not liking it, I'd totally understand that, but not at least understand the story. I did see one mixed reviewer talk about love.

    • @BobSmith-g4b
      @BobSmith-g4b Місяць тому +1

      You're absolutely right, on all counts. What's funny, though, is that your little comment stated more conscious, detailed observations about the movie and its inspirations than this entire 15+ minute bitchfest full of vague condemnations and hollow intellectual posturing (without any intellectual observations, natch). He literally couldn't think of any specific details to address, so he just pivoted to vague feelings about the celebrities involved. Dude needs to turn off Andy Cohen and crack open a few books

    • @lymphomasurvive
      @lymphomasurvive 25 днів тому

      @@BobSmith-g4b Most reviewers were like that. I know the educational system has been bad but I'm more worried than ever; the system has been degrading for years but this is horrible. It has such a simple narrative structure with a relatively simple message that it should be easy to see. The rest is a matter of taste and I do respect that part of not liking it. Most attacks, though, have no real merit.

  • @kristineh1601
    @kristineh1601 Місяць тому +2

    As Adam Driver’s biggest fan, his film choices have been driving me nuts. He’s such a phenomenal actor who has so much power, passion, and emotion in his performances but he keeps getting landed in all these director passion projects. He hasn’t been in a truly ENJOYABLE film in so long, even if they’re good they’re so dark or overly dramatic that I wouldn’t call them enjoyable. I would love to just be able to chilax and watch him in a simple romantic comedy just for a breath of fresh air.

    • @chamindujanith6337
      @chamindujanith6337 Місяць тому

      I think Ferrari is very decent

    • @kristineh1601
      @kristineh1601 Місяць тому +2

      @@chamindujanith6337I thought it was decent albeit a little lacking. I just want him to be in something GREAT again.

    • @chamindujanith6337
      @chamindujanith6337 Місяць тому

      Michael Mann films are not very enjoyable outside a few like Thief, The Last of the Mohicans, Collateral.

    • @kristineh1601
      @kristineh1601 Місяць тому +1

      @@chamindujanith6337I’d throw Heat in there as well.

    • @chamindujanith6337
      @chamindujanith6337 Місяць тому

      @kristineh1601 Heat is Up and down enjoyment wise. Some parts are very mechanical or technical. While the two sides are doing their thing.
      Public Enemies is very enjoyable but has a hugely problematic soundtrack at most times.

  • @GotNextVideo
    @GotNextVideo 25 днів тому +1

    The one thing I would disagree with is that I do find this movie crosses the threshold into unintentional comedy to where I really enjoyed it and would watch it again. But not because anything in it worked as intended.

  • @deliciousfilmreviews3871
    @deliciousfilmreviews3871 Місяць тому +2

    This isn't even the worst film I've seen in theaters this week

  • @2012Pictures
    @2012Pictures Місяць тому +3

    He said this isn’t his last film. He has two more lined up, I believe.

    • @paulvargas2609
      @paulvargas2609 Місяць тому +1

      Hopefully not a sequel to this!!!🤣🤣🤣

    • @vinnym5607
      @vinnym5607 Місяць тому

      Maybe not after this unless everyone else involved watches him like a hawk.

    • @chrisdick2305
      @chrisdick2305 Місяць тому

      Who is going to fund them after this disaster?

    • @2012Pictures
      @2012Pictures Місяць тому

      @@vinnym5607 You might be right. But he also still has money from selling his winery, so he could just self-fund again.

  • @singstreetcar5881
    @singstreetcar5881 Місяць тому +19

    Cant belive mr coopola will be bowing out of the industry with this film. Yikes

    • @qcrew2938
      @qcrew2938 Місяць тому +4

      Good riddance... we don't need anymore weird kisses and awkward hugs on set

  • @lawrencerinehart5747
    @lawrencerinehart5747 Місяць тому +1

    Just Remember..., If He Didn't Make This Film... You Wouldn't Have This Review.

  • @wht-rabt-obj
    @wht-rabt-obj Місяць тому +2

    The Outsiders 😢💕💕

  • @eddiechase305
    @eddiechase305 Місяць тому +2

    This movie would've been better off as a musica dramal a la Romeo and Juliet with Leo and Claire Danes. I saw it on Thursday. The ONLY way to rebrand this for marketing purposes is to advertise it like a "sh*tshow so crazy you have to see" and maybe make it a drinking game for every unnecessary Shakespeare quote or monologue from Adam Driver. He was insufferable.

  • @GS-vb3zn
    @GS-vb3zn 10 днів тому +1

    Why are some reviewers trying to pretend that this film is not a pretentious mess? It must be that thing that seems particular to some film enthusiasts - The Great Man Auteur Must Never Be Criticized - dictum. It seems to apply in varying degrees to Wes Anderson and Tarantino also.

    • @eamonndeane587
      @eamonndeane587 9 днів тому +1

      Either they genuinely think it's a brilliant piece of art, or they don't want to admit that they've wasted their time watching a Pretentious piece of drivel.

  • @BRAIRCO
    @BRAIRCO Місяць тому +1

    Terrible film, a nonsense that is not understood. The actresses are of very low quality and it shows in their acting and since the actor does not understand his role it is not known if the acting is good or bad. Now I understand why the movie studios didn't want to produce it. There is no script and it is the sum of incomprehensible philosophical scenes. Very BAD and a failure at the box office and in critics, even though there are some who rescue something from this disaster, probably some snobbish critic and friend of Coppola?

  • @vinnyv949
    @vinnyv949 Місяць тому +1

    One of the worst movies I’ve ever seen. Over the past few years I’ve seen some of the worst movies ever: this, Men, Beau is afraid, and Babylon.

  • @branagain
    @branagain Місяць тому +2

    Ridley Scott is 86 and has never won an Oscar. I really hope Gladiator 2 is good and it’s not another old man trying to make an ambitious movie.

  • @johnnolan5579
    @johnnolan5579 Місяць тому +10

    Adam Driver has very little charisma. I've never been able to figure out his success considering there are so many other actors with far more appeal. And please, enough with Shia LeBeouf, and I never, EVER want to see nut job Jon Voight again!

    • @eamonndeane587
      @eamonndeane587 Місяць тому +1

      Driver is about as compelling as a Goat Chewing Wallpaper.

    • @norm-bb3bb
      @norm-bb3bb Місяць тому +1

      Agreed

    • @adamquiles2468
      @adamquiles2468 Місяць тому

      Driver has stage background so he really can't be bad at all

  • @FigmentHF
    @FigmentHF Місяць тому +3

    Is this film actually bad, or is it “bad” like Southland Tales was supposed to be bad? That film gets better each passing year. I worry that the human brain simply rejects that which isn’t novel only within predictable frameworks. I’ll go pay to see this as the cinema

  • @RabbiJoeInJerusalem
    @RabbiJoeInJerusalem Місяць тому +1

    My entire conscious life, people have been making excuses for Coppola. And I'm pushing 50.

  • @cybergothika6906
    @cybergothika6906 Місяць тому +1

    What I learned is that no matter who you are in Hollywood, someone will always try to change the curse of production. Like the "big spider" story Kevin Smith told once, about insane producers. Ridley Scott's Prometheus also had awful dialogues but since it was from Alien's universe lots of people loved it. I guess opinion is an extreme relativistic thing.

    • @bradysmith4405
      @bradysmith4405 Місяць тому

      Prometheus had a horrible script but its production values were top notch. This movie looks like Neil Breen was given a few mil

  • @geeksontapshow
    @geeksontapshow Місяць тому +2

    I love The Rainmaker. Underrated Gem. Is it as good as The Godfather or Apocalypse Now? No, it's not. But I think it's a really solid movie in his catalog.

    • @vinnym5607
      @vinnym5607 Місяць тому

      "The Rainmaker" is fine. I don't think it in any way demonstrated what this was or that anything like this was coming.

  • @thetraveledwoman
    @thetraveledwoman Місяць тому +6

    Your expression at the beginning of the video is a first I think. Poor Brian you were beside yourself over this awful movie 😂

  • @BigBeeBeeSting
    @BigBeeBeeSting Місяць тому +1

    I really am looking forward to seeing this. Is it me but are critics more interested in pulling faces than anything else.

  • @OscarMPG1
    @OscarMPG1 Місяць тому +2

    I called it MegaSLOPolis

  • @3l3llala13
    @3l3llala13 Місяць тому +3

    So did he like the movie? Looking at the bright side, people working on the film got paychecks.

  • @darkalligator
    @darkalligator Місяць тому +1

    Mega disaster

  • @alexauclair1
    @alexauclair1 Місяць тому +2

    That movie was good it just wasn’t a typical story

  • @bluevol1976
    @bluevol1976 Місяць тому +1

    Wait, now you’re going to make me pull a Gotti and actually see this one just out curiosity 🤣🤣

  • @edwardwaits47
    @edwardwaits47 Місяць тому +4

    I went to watch Megalopolis again and noticed a few things were missing from the print I saw on opening day. The first time I saw it, there was this really intentional delay in a scene where Cesar was talking-a super long pause. I’d heard it was meant to give a member of the audience or staff a chance to read a line from the script or something like that. Also, the slogans shouted by the protestors in the film seemed to be cut in the second viewing.
    The film felt like a mix of things: it had this play-like quality at times, but it also had elements of film noir, Fellini’s surrealism, and that campy Gotham City vibe. It felt nostalgic in a way, like the director was pulling from the styles and themes he connected with in his youth. By mixing in those familiar elements, I think he’s getting the audience to experience the film on multiple levels-part homage, part commentary on the issues we’re dealing with today.
    I really enjoyed it more the second time around, once I stopped comparing it to Coppola’s earlier films. This one’s different. It’s got a lot going on, and I think people will be talking about it for a long time. Honestly, I think given time it nay earn a place amongst the greats.

    • @agesflow6815
      @agesflow6815 Місяць тому

      I watched it for 2nd time yesterday and also thought I noticed some slight changes. Do you recall in what scene the long pause occurred?

    • @Calers-gu1ib
      @Calers-gu1ib Місяць тому

      So, can reactors really be on the payroll for Hollywood, the real guys attacking Coppola?

  • @jlg5967
    @jlg5967 Місяць тому +7

    Coppola had one great decade (1969 to 1979) in a six decade career.He's directed stinkers before, FINIAN'S RAINBOW and JACK. For the last 45 years he's been a mediocre director.

  • @tcu1099
    @tcu1099 Місяць тому +2

    So, I find myself morbidly curious. Is this movie fun if you've been drinking? I saw the Adam Driver "club" clip and the visuals make me think that this might be a fun buzzed watch.

    • @vinnym5607
      @vinnym5607 Місяць тому

      Same here but I can't even make it to the movies for stuff I want to see like the "Beetlejuice" sequel.

    • @tcu1099
      @tcu1099 Місяць тому

      @@vinnym5607 oh true. Gotta decide how you wanna spend your 2 hours 😔. Very good point. Spend your 2 on something good!

  • @GeneFreaks
    @GeneFreaks Місяць тому +2

    largely agree but c'mon - Aubrey Plaza is the best part of this movie. She was one of the few actors who had an actual character to play!

  • @Jamal3.87
    @Jamal3.87 Місяць тому +3

    Your reaction to the movie is the consensus but like you, I have so much respect and admiration for Coppola, I’ll have to check it out. But I’ll tread carefully.

    • @vinnym5607
      @vinnym5607 Місяць тому

      Maybe see a cheap matinee.

    • @lymphomasurvive
      @lymphomasurvive Місяць тому

      Read my comment in the main section. The movie is better when you understand it.

    • @TheNewyorkmets01
      @TheNewyorkmets01 Місяць тому

      And the consensus is always right! lmao..... sheep

    • @lymphomasurvive
      @lymphomasurvive Місяць тому

      @TheNewyorkmets01 It's a good movie. Don't know if it's great but I'll watch it again when it comes to the small screen. But I understand it and everything connected.

    • @stxrstrxckmxteo515
      @stxrstrxckmxteo515 Місяць тому

      @@lymphomasurviveif it’s anything like Babylon I’ll watch it