SpaceX & Astronauts Ready To Rescue Hubble But NASA Says NO...
Вставка
- Опубліковано 16 чер 2024
- SpaceX & Astronauts Ready To Rescue Hubble But NASA Says NO...
===
intro: 0:00
(Hubble’s troubles) 0:46
(SpaceX Dragon’s rescue mission) 2:14
(SpaceX’s new EVA suit) 3:32
(Nasa’s other selection) 7:12
(Nasa official declined) 8:49
why did Nasa's officials decline this? 10:36
(SpaceX dares to take risk) 14:02
outro 15:41
===
#techmap #techmaps #elonmusk #starshipspacex #spacex
===
1) SOURCES OF IMAGES AND VIDEOS
John Cargile: / groundtruthpics
WAI: / @whataboutit
/ felixschlang
Tony Bela : / infographictony
Everyday Astronaut: / erdayastronaut
/ everydayastronaut
===
SpaceX & Astronauts Ready To Rescue Hubble But NASA Says NO...
SpaceX & Astronauts Ready To Rescue Hubble But NASA Says NO...
On April 24, Nasa's Space Hubble telescope turned 34 years old.
Although was not the first space telescope, Hubble is one of the largest and most versatile, renowned as a vital research tool and as a public relations boon for astronomy.
SpaceX & Astronauts Ready To Rescue Hubble But NASA Says NO...
So, to keep this great telescope healthy in space, Nasa carried out periodic costly rescue missions aboard its retired space shuttle.
But now, they can not do it anymore. The limited availability of reliable vehicles and budget forced the national agency to call for free help from private companies, especially SpaceX.
In response, SpaceX has prepared everything needed for this critical future mission including rockets, spacecraft, high-quality experts, and even spacesuits.
SpaceX & Astronauts Ready To Rescue Hubble But NASA Says NO...
The Hubble telescope is named after astronomer Edwin Hubble and is one of Nasa's Great Observatories. Throughout its length of history and more than 1.6 million observations, this telescope sent back to Earth jaw-dropping images of the universe, expanding our understanding of space.
In 1990, it was deployed by Nasa’s Space shuttle to an altitude of 600 kilometers above the Earth's surface. That orbit has gradually decayed from atmospheric drag and is currently at about 535 kilometers. Continued decay creates a 50% probability that Hubble will reenter by 2037. Of course, the gradual fall in space is not Hubble's only issue.
===
Subcribe TechMap: tinyurl.com/3z5ysrtf
I say let them try to bring it back to life. I believe SpaceX and crew can do it. Go SpaceX 👍👍‼️‼️
😍😍😍😍
First quit blowing up your own rockets!
I think that NASA also those that say SPACEX should not do it , they are afraid that if a private company can do what NASA and their highly trained astronauts have done , and they can do it a lot cheaper ,then why fund that part of the agency. Just let them stick to sending their probes, rovers, etc.
That would be great, what would be better is if they let NASA run NASA and stop all the senators and congressman requiring parts and labor be done in their states.
@@GimbleOnDew I absolutely agree with you on that .
Sounds like they are trying to say that spaceX would not be able to make sure that the suits will work properly.
Put the suits in a vacuum chamber and test them out at twice or three times the pressure to make sure the suits will do the job properly? Shoot micro particles at high velocity at the suits to make sure they can hold up in space. They will also have to make sure that the tether will carry the proper oxygen to the space suits. The tether will hold up in space and won’t be damaged from micrometers.
So that's why SpaceX isn't allowed to bring them to the Moon 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
SpaceX is not safe
I say let them try to bring it back to life. I believe SpaceX and crew can do it. Go SpaceX!
Keep your hands off of it. We don't need that exploding too.
@@davidsoom1551 Go somewhere else and troll Bezos.
34 years ago...The NSA, "Here you go NASA, you can have one of our Spy Satellites". NASA, "I wonder what would happen if we point that thing at the stars?"
Bill Nelson wants money to go to one of his donors! 😝
NASA's concerns are obvious. Certainly SpaceX would have planned to do the testing needed.
I think SpaceX could do it even without a robotic arm. I would not be surprised they come up with a folding scaffolding attached between hubble and Dragon.
Thanks for sharing. Hopefully, Nasa can read your words
Put an airlock and materials in the Dragon Frunk, dock and use the airlock to eva.
DO IT!
SpaceX should just go up and fix it!! What the Hell is NASA gonna do??? As the old saying goes, it's easier to ask for forgiveness than to ask for permission!!!
it explains why something suck like SLS and Starliner were made
Great Video ! Send the SpaceX Crew Dragon and/or the Boeing Starliner to dock with the Hubble Space Telescope to raise the orbit of the Telescope ! Later the Blue Origin Blue Moon HLS can dock with the Hubble Space Telescope for repair by doing a EVA/Space Walk using the Canadian Arm ! The Blue Moon HLS should have an Air Lock/Dust Lock (per Mike Griffin-NASA Headquarters), a Crew Module with a Docking Port to support a four person Crew, a 6.1 km/sec delta-V (per Robert Zubrin-"Moon Direct") and be Single Stage and Reusable ! The Blue Moon HLS/LEV/LLV can then support missions in LEO, HST, GEO and one way flights to the moon to be serviced for return ! The Tech developed to return to the moon to stay, can take US and the world to Mars and beyond ! Later the SpaceX Starship can recover the Telescope to earth to be serviced for reflight ! tjl
THanks a lot for sharing
I think NASA is wise in saying no to this.
Sell Hubble to SpaceX for $1!
Why SpaceX need this?
@techmap9 Elon could find a way to monetize and use it as publicity. Start a 'go fund me' so any person can spend $5 and say they kept humble alive.
NASA...Never A Straight Answer
It is politics. NASA doesn't want SpaceX to do it.
"It is politics." What do u mean?
I think musk should start working on a capsule with a air lock wait Apollo didnt have one lol either
Air lock? Try getting Starship into orbit.
Isn't it salvage now?
NASA has a record of favouring new projects over extending old ones. Hubble is an exceptionally long-lived one, and NASA will have a similar new project, the Nancy Roman Telescope, with science operations shared between STScI at Johns Hopkins and IPAC at Caltech starting circa 2027. NASA may be thinking about rationalization of operations. Similar considerations have governed the operation or closure of smaller ground-based telescopes for many years (though fortunately in space one does not have to worry about resurgent ethno-religious claims to mountain tops...).
Refurbish. You also might look at changing it's orbit both higher and to a better orbit for more servicing .
Then with starship coming online, you could launch a big telescope in the visible and UV light regime, that is serviceable.
What would an 8 meter diameter telescope achieve in space? Starship has a 9m diameter. Hubble has a 2.4 meter mirror.
An 8 meter telescope has 11 times the light gathering power. Sensors are now even better.
Another option is have the robot to boost Hubble, to have its own gyros. They then do the work that the gyros that Hubble currently uses. Fully robotic.
Let spaces fix Hubble!! They have the capability to do it
Hey NASA, at least let them Boost it to keep it safe, then fix it later!
Yeah! This is a reasonable idea
Yes, just boost it so it stays in orbit for 5 or 10 more years. By then there will be a starship or other craft capable of bringing it back.
But forget NASA.
SpaceX should do it on their own and claim salvage rights. Then sell it to the Smithsonian or outer museum or put it on display at a SpaceX office. Or Blue Origen or whoever can salvage it.
NASA needs balls ⚽️ ⚽️
Haven't had any since the early 70's!!!
This was a great report. Thank you.
You are welcome
I don’t get it Space X and its private companies can save it so why won’t they let them!
Why can't SpaceX save Starship from blowing up every time?
Get back to me when you have the final version of the EVA suit…
We will have the final version because we always keep upgrading
An 8-meter telescope would have 11 times the light-gathering power of Hubble. With todays sensors, imagine the possibilities!
We will have a better and better one, but Hubble is still a legend, right?
No it comes down to NASA losing face over their spending of money already on its OWN - EVA suits....
With everything that has happened in the past decade, NASA has lost its face
Wat a waste of such if there no hire you for space walk
How many times will you use same thumbnail 🤣🤣
Guess what 😁
Maybe SpaceX could consider an extension big enough to pull the Hubble down low enough the Astronaut can do all the work there and then I propose the idea of mounting the Hubble Telescope to a poll and then mounting it to the international space station so if the Hubble needs more maintenance someone could just walk out and take care of business.
That is great idea
Great idea. But a quick google shows the ISS at a much lower altitude. By something over 100+ kilometers.
@@lazrus7049And a very different orbital inclination which is the bigger problem.
I understand you peeps are joking.
NASA, LOL.... We went to the Moon!
seems that if the SpaceX team can make an orbital class rocket go up. flip around and land with a soft touch on and ocean drone ship, they have the smarts to go up to Hubble and match it's orbit then tether to the ring on hubble and do the repairs and boost it up. And even if they repair it without boosting it in 2029, they could come back on another mission in 2030 just to boost it.
❤❤❤❤
By the way, how much money Nasa has to spend to save and bring this Hubble Telescope back to earth?
Well NASA I say yes in fixing Hubble Telescope 🔭 and when its fix I'm suggesting you move the Hubble to be mounted to the international space station that way if anything else needs fixed they can do it cheaper.
ISS is at an orbit at least 100 KM below that of Hubble. That lower orbit also has issues with Space Junk. Several times the ISS has had to move or prepare for collisions with incoming space debris. But SpaceX could plan a mission for 2030. There isn't a need to rush a mission.
I’m not against innovation and progress but I just got carbon fibre submarine vibes from this.
Does ISS have a robotic arm?
Yeah
@@KiwiBrowserSupport They could tow Hubble to the ISS and fix it there. Then tow it to a higher orbit.
It might just have sum forbidden equipment on board, that they denied was ever there, and it would not be a secret anymore, having been working all this time,when they denied it was put in to space,
Get help. Seriously.
SpaceX should just go up and fix it! Whats NASA gonna do? Its easier to ask for forgiveness than permission!
Elon should just buy it off NASA and go on and save it!!
😂😂😂
Better buy than Twitter
Elon should buy it off NASA? Most of elon's money is from the taxpayer! He should worry about Starship his colossal failure.
Elon should go full bond villan and steal it.
can i "AKS" an OBVIOUS question ; why the concern NOW??!!! how many Gemini space walks , with PUNY capsule were successfully done AS WELL AS most Apollo missions to retrieve PHOTO FILM .... just 'aksing' for a friend !!! seriously ??!! nasa cares NOW??!!
The Gemini and Soviet spacewalks were not without issues. Many of the astronauts had problems with the visor fogging, or tears obscuring vision. The first Soviet Cosmonaut to walk in space had issues with their space suit inflating so bady that they could not re-enter the airlock, they actually had to bleed air out of their suit. Working on Hubble is magnitudes beyond what the Gemini astronauts were asked to do... and with out a shuttle to brace it... the work becomes more complicated, and risky.
It is things like this which NASA should have made a new updated space shuttle NOT dream chaser or Artemis !!!!!!!!!
And don't count on Starship for anything except a forth of July display!
Say that again about the van Allen radiation belt and it being the highest orbit; now isn’t the moon beyond the van Allen radiation belt? I don’t know maybe I’m just fucked up here. I don’t know just a question for a friend, So The highest orbit is going up to the van Allen radiation belt. Did we ever go to the Moon asking for a friend?
I think NASA wants to wait and use the manned Sierra's Dream Chaser to take care of the Hubble Space Telescope. It's a smaller shuttle type craft that NASA may feel more comfortable/familiar with then what SpaceX, Boeing and Blue Origin have to offer. But, that's just a guess.
Interesting! Thanks for showing your thought
Was SpaceX going to charge NASA or whomever for the rescue?
Who owns Hubble?
WELL ORBIT IS INTERNATIONAL TERRITORY SO IF HE THE HUBBLE MAKE HE A SPACE PIRATE LOL ELON MUSK FIRST SPACE PIRATE "DRINK UP MY HEARTY'S YO HO"
SpaceX is an Elon Musk company. They recently had to recall every Tesla truck that was produced because they are not safe or roadworthy. Would you trust them to take you to Mars in Tesla Tin Can?
Why is the speech so slow.i feel like a drunk guy is narrating. I had to watch this video at 2x speed...
Get a human to do your narration.
AI voice information dump!!!
WTF ! .... Again ! ... You're comparing Applies to Oranges ! ... One is Independent , while the other is Tethered ! ... What's the point of that ? ... :-|
SpaceX better stick to trying not to crash their own rockets!
Spacex is launching rockets every two to three days with no problems. SpaceX is far more successful than any other space agency or company. Gotta go - watching another Falcon launch in 4 minutes.
Nice Troll account
THEY BETTER THEN THE GOVERNMENT RETARD OF NASA
Lies Lies Lies
What a shame for Nasa officials
This is a good example of the fact that now there seem to be two wings of SpaceX: the falcon nine wing and the starship wing. The falcon nine wing is open, consult with engineers from other disciplines and other organizations, is honest about what their capabilities are, and only makes commitments that they can actually keep. The starship wing or the Elon wing is closed, Hides what they’re doing, does not give any real insight into what they can and cannot really do, makes wild promises about what starship is going to be capable of, and seems to be staffed with engineers that are either not allowed to do their job correctly or just don’t know how to do their job correctly. I blame Elon for this because the decisions that have been made in the development and testing of starship clearly are those of a chucklehead. A good example of how the starship wing or Elon wing of SpaceX is blowing. It is the secret development of the heat shield. Where are pictures of the test rig for the heat shield? Where is data about the testing and the development of the heat shield? Where is the consultation with people who had experience with the space shuttle heat shield? The wild claims made for the heat shield have to be made because Elon is promising that the starship will be rapidly reusable! If the heat has to be repaired after every flight, the starship stage will not be rapidly reusable, nor will it be terribly economical.
Your an ID10T
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
Get to the dang point.
NASA has outlived their usefulness. Bill Nelson needs to be forcibly retired.
NASA in its whole time hasn't blown up as many rockets as SpaceX has in the last few years. Without taxpayer money spaceX would be a bunch of flawed rockets standing up like tombstones in Boca Chica.
@@davidsoom1551 SpaxeX didn’t spend nearly the amount of money on failures as NASA, and has also figured out how to reuse most of their rockets while NASA wastes them, just like with taxpayer money.
@@PyroRob69The Biden administration has awarded SpaceX $4.1 billion dollars for Starship R&D and construction.
OKI will try to be kind but I am sick and freaking tired of history lessons. If you're gonna do something on something, do the story forget the history, you know it's boring
Does ISS have a robotic arm? NASA should consider all options.
The budget of the NASA rescue mission should be less than a weekly shipment of new weapons to Ukraine, where they would be destroyed in not time anyway. Or look at the yearly 1 trillion U$ budget of the US military, there should be enough money to siphon away for this mission, while hundreds of billions of US dollars in the past have disappeared unaccounted anyway. If there is will, there is a way.
Elon should just buy it off NASA and save it!
Elon first needs to launch his rocket without it blowng up, EVERY TIME.
@@davidsoom1551 What rocket?