@@miorioff Zoo also controls the board, so is zoo a control deck also? No. Both of them are tempo decks which play very similar to midrange types. They try to win through tempo and only trade when advantageous.
@水銀燈 It isn't, though. By that logic, literally every deck in the game is a control deck since they all play minions and react to board states. You're overgeneralizing.
Tried out this deck and in my first three games I just didn't draw scrap heap imp or magic carpet. Literally, in each game, those four cards were in the bottom 10 cards of the deck. Any advice to help win in those scenarios?
Concede and try again looks to be the easiest solve. Note that at the start of the video he was willing to drop rating to ensure better matchups. Especially since ranking up is easier than ever.
Yeah I've climbed pretty fast at low ranks with this deck by either starting with scrapheap imp turn 2 or by digging for answers by discarding hand of guldan on turn 2/3 them dropping 2 imps turn 4 in slower matchups. The deck has crazy highroll potential and good board swing tempo turns Vs aggro but I've found it very luck dependent
@@herrkapilz7459 only caught that later, but tbh, advice still applies. With high roll aggro/ tempo decks, you go for winning or losing as fast as possible for fastest ranking by sheer numbers.
Quick question: is his hand always this full with this deck? If so, wouldn't mountain giant be a good addition? PS: haven't played the game myself for quite some time, just watch firebat, zalae and kibler every once in a while
Besides what the other say, it is in principle bad. You only have a full hand if you get the second best combo of the deck (first is scrap imp + 1 drops, second is hand of guldan + discard), adding a card (MG) that is great only in the scenario where you already drew a good combo is not necessary, you already have the combo and are probably 50%+ likely to win. You need cards that are good when you're drawing bad and not have any of the good combos.
Poor Marcolin. Showed up just when free wins were out of stock.
"Shieldbearer is actually a pretty decent Hearthstone card" - Gallon 2020
4 stats for 1 mana? It's practically a battlemage!
@@520_metal And Taunt too? opop
I remember Reynad used to run shieldbearer in zoo back in the day
I like how the buffed abusive sergeant is just forgotten about.
Tempo
Gallon muted his mic while eating. Actually a decent human being, that's quite rare amongst streamers these days.
1:12 idk i like this quitter i watch his videos every time they come out
1:32 Skipperino firebaterino
Firebat knows the importance of ladder results: 0.
who would have though that pirate control warrior would be a thing
Calling that deck control is a massive stretch.
@@Mouse_Librarian it controls the board. So it is a control deck. Its not old fatigue-style warrior but it's not aggro or mid-range either
@@miorioff Zoo also controls the board, so is zoo a control deck also? No. Both of them are tempo decks which play very similar to midrange types. They try to win through tempo and only trade when advantageous.
@水銀燈 It isn't, though. By that logic, literally every deck in the game is a control deck since they all play minions and react to board states. You're overgeneralizing.
@@Mouse_Librarian Aggro-control is and has been a named archetype for decades
More of these videos please. We need those pro tips
Trying to get to 420 strats
Hey man been watching you on grand masters great man keep it up nice turn around with purple.
This warrior meta is making my pirate warrior quite sneaky
Big rip on the 0-3 with this deck against Frozen
0:48 LMAO
"I'm gonna die" - Firebat 2020
I was 1 star off legend and kept hitting warrior. That matchup is ROUGH
Tried out this deck and in my first three games I just didn't draw scrap heap imp or magic carpet. Literally, in each game, those four cards were in the bottom 10 cards of the deck. Any advice to help win in those scenarios?
Concede and try again looks to be the easiest solve. Note that at the start of the video he was willing to drop rating to ensure better matchups. Especially since ranking up is easier than ever.
Yeah I've climbed pretty fast at low ranks with this deck by either starting with scrapheap imp turn 2 or by digging for answers by discarding hand of guldan on turn 2/3 them dropping 2 imps turn 4 in slower matchups. The deck has crazy highroll potential and good board swing tempo turns Vs aggro but I've found it very luck dependent
@@Osric24 only because he didn't care about the ranking to practise the matchups he will play against in a tournament where he bans warrior
@@herrkapilz7459 only caught that later, but tbh, advice still applies. With high roll aggro/ tempo decks, you go for winning or losing as fast as possible for fastest ranking by sheer numbers.
Yeah, instead of not drawing them, you should try drawing them instead
But blizzard made a tech card that destroys armor and its only 5 mana! Should blizzard make something that steals armor next?
Could be a pretty cool Rogue card idea
No
PLATEBREAKER TECH
Quick question: is his hand always this full with this deck? If so, wouldn't mountain giant be a good addition? PS: haven't played the game myself for quite some time, just watch firebat, zalae and kibler every once in a while
mountain giant rotated
hand isn't full most of the time anyway so even if it was playable mountain giant wouldn't be very good in this deck
Thanks! MG would probably fuck up the discard mechanic anyway
It would also clog up the hand of guldan discard effects a lot of the time
Besides what the other say, it is in principle bad. You only have a full hand if you get the second best combo of the deck (first is scrap imp + 1 drops, second is hand of guldan + discard), adding a card (MG) that is great only in the scenario where you already drew a good combo is not necessary, you already have the combo and are probably 50%+ likely to win. You need cards that are good when you're drawing bad and not have any of the good combos.
Heyyy early upload
First