Ian, you throw statements out such as "For everyone '1' of him there are 100 that didn't make it." That's fine, but using this material to drive your opinion is a fallacy. The majority of your talk plays on associative-relationalism through societal experiences; providing no proof to your claim. Mirror neurons are the basis of the 'Law of Attraction', diminishing the role luck has in obtaining success, power, wealth or whatever else you desire. Luck has absolutely no weight; we make our luck.
Interesting perspectives
The photo is not buster Mathis jr. It’s Riddick Bowe....who was the heavyweight champion and not a tomato can like Mathis
Ian also makes error in his calculation that italy was going to win if that penalty shot went behind the Tavarel.
It will continue the shootouts.
Ian, you throw statements out such as "For everyone '1' of him there are 100 that didn't make it." That's fine, but using this material to drive your opinion is a fallacy. The majority of your talk plays on associative-relationalism through societal experiences; providing no proof to your claim. Mirror neurons are the basis of the 'Law of Attraction', diminishing the role luck has in obtaining success, power, wealth or whatever else you desire. Luck has absolutely no weight; we make our luck.
If you were Ian and someone like you asked for proof, what would you provide?