Gettysburg(1993) Making Of 2

Поділитися
Вставка

КОМЕНТАРІ • 68

  • @XMrSurrealisticX
    @XMrSurrealisticX 11 років тому +16

    Shelby Foote...love this man to death! Could listen to him for days :)

  • @cellofingers
    @cellofingers 10 років тому +12

    Looks like Shelby came right from 1863 straight to the TV studio. He should have been in the film.

  • @alexhidell8074
    @alexhidell8074 8 років тому +25

    Longstreet wasn't suggesting to Lee that the Army retreat. He wanted a lateral movement which would put the Rebels between the Yankee Army and Washington, forcing the Yankees into being the ones who charged against a dug-in force. Instead, it was the Rebels charging the dug-in Yankees at Gettysburg.

    • @deanbelvins7279
      @deanbelvins7279 5 років тому +1

      Add he was right!! Only Gen T J (Stonewall) Jackson could have executed Gen Lee’s orders effectively on July 3rd!!

    • @whysrumgone
      @whysrumgone 3 роки тому +2

      @@deanbelvins7279 no, Jackson would not have been able to make 1.5 mi charge across open ground work. Where Jackson would have made the difference is day one when his successors dithered and gave up the fight before they had finished pushing the Union off cemetery ridge and Culp's hill. However, had he done so, the battle we know today would have been little more than a footnote to the battle either where Meade was preparing, or somewhere between Gettysburg and Washington where Longstreet wanted to move even after the first day of fighting.

    • @stevestringer7351
      @stevestringer7351 2 роки тому +1

      @@whysrumgone if Gen. Jackson had still been alive. The battle would have been much farther north than Gettysburg. Remember, Gen. Jackson covered more ground than other Corps.
      Also, with the loss of Gen. Jackson, Gen. Lee had reorganized the entire army from 2 ton3 Corps and 2 of the 3 Corps commanders were new to that level of command and were not capable of making such an intricate move especially under fire and in the face of a determined, well trained, well supplied and trained enemy.

  • @jemonaco
    @jemonaco 10 років тому +24

    I very much admire Shelby Foote, His narratives on the War Between the States I found gripping and brilliant. I think until a person visits Gettysburg, they are ignorant of the American experience.

  • @aldousjosea.castro1887
    @aldousjosea.castro1887 8 років тому +4

    FYI... Cemetery Hill was defended. Howard left a Division and 40 cannon there when he passed through. Ewell would not have taken it with the 11,000+ men he had available.

  • @Barbs1986
    @Barbs1986 4 роки тому +7

    Was Sam Elliott born at the age of 40 and never grew old?

  • @Hannibal953able
    @Hannibal953able 8 років тому +8

    General Porter Alexander was right, the Confederates should have dug in after the success of July first and let the Federals come to them.

  • @MrJimc2
    @MrJimc2 10 років тому +4

    I agree that his attack was arrogant and quite an act of desperation but no more so than Burnside at Fredericksburg. It would have seemed that Lee would have learned from Burnside's ignorance and arrogance yet, to the amazement of most, he followed suit.

  • @Oberg42
    @Oberg42 11 років тому +1

    I totally agree, what a voice and knowledge!

  • @gyrofoam1
    @gyrofoam1 11 років тому +6

    That's odd. The scene with Lee's aide telling him that Hill's heading into Gettysburg for some shoes (there being a factory in the town) is left out of the finished movie. Half of the AoNV were barefoot and it's an important aspect of just how the clusterfuck began.

    • @eq1373
      @eq1373 11 місяців тому +1

      It was in the directors cut.

  • @mikemcdaniel7675
    @mikemcdaniel7675 7 років тому +17

    Enjoyed Gettysburg very much...Gods and Generals was a mess

    • @MrJoebrooklyn1969
      @MrJoebrooklyn1969 4 роки тому +3

      God's and Generals was southern propaganda.

    • @aztroboy1450
      @aztroboy1450 3 роки тому

      Confederate Propaganda and historically inaccuracies, also Slow, Tedious, and Boring, but to me Stonewall Jackson's scenes are watchable because of Stephen Lang's great Performance.

  • @VictorLepanto
    @VictorLepanto 11 років тому +9

    I believe Lee suffered from a typical delusion of his time. He had been taught @ West Point to basically worship Bonaparte as the great genius of the age. Thus Lee always sought to bring his enemy into a situation where he could annihiliate it. While he might have seemed to be luring his enemy in w/ passive traps, he always tried to turn this situation around & annihilate the enemy. This cost him far too many of his own men. Lee also carried out many attacks on Washington from the South.

    • @stevestringer7351
      @stevestringer7351 2 роки тому +1

      You know, I can't say I Disagree with your reply. I have always thought that Gen. Lee fought his army like he had limitless troop replacements. The fact is that whenever he won a huge battle.... it cost him more and more of the cream of his army.

  • @BeckettSong
    @BeckettSong 8 років тому +2

    "A dangerous savage child race" is how the Star Trek TNG omnipotent entity, Q(John DeLancie), referred to humans. That's a good description of us. Humans have made mistakes, fought wars based on differing religious, political, or economical beliefs, but we will someday in the far future learn from all those mistakes and improve ourselves as an entire planet-wide species.

    • @BeckettSong
      @BeckettSong 8 років тому

      Blah Blah Blah!

    • @BeckettSong
      @BeckettSong 8 років тому

      I'm not even going to dignify that with a response. Oops, too late! LOL!

    • @hannahdenny5519
      @hannahdenny5519 7 років тому +2

      Steven Baldi If you look at any war, each individual side was "right". No one went to war that I know saying their cause or reason was wrong. If you look at this world as one theatre, can you find any stronghold that speaks of peace and wisdom? I can't.
      Personally, I look forward to the last war where God reigns and true peace will reign forever.

  • @Chubachus
    @Chubachus 12 років тому +1

    Wow excellent info on the production process

  • @decimated550
    @decimated550 12 років тому +4

    those reenactors must have really felt the ghosts watching them. Tremendous production...too bad movies like this, historically accurate and honest, don't get the attention from the wider public. Profits tend to be low, and i think the Gettysburg movie even lost money overall. But i applaud the producers and actors who know they are making a better quality product than the usual crapola streaming out of hollywood.

  • @fldinosaur
    @fldinosaur 9 років тому +3

    gyrofoam1...The movie was pretty good in it's accuracy but they still missed an awful lot. They never went in for shoes and there never was any shoe factory. It was as simple as the two armies happening upon each other.

    • @xrtc7540
      @xrtc7540 9 років тому +2

      fldinosaur Yeah, the shoe story is highly doubtful. Gettysburg was a small country town with only the clothing and supplies needed by their few citizens. There was no reasons to believe there was some huge stash of shoes or any type of supplies there to make it valuable to tens of thousands of troops. Besides, Early's boys had passed through Gettysburg a few days before, and if there had been anything there worth taking, they would have already done so.
      Gettysburg's real value was strategic. All anyone has to do is look at a map of that area even today and see that G-burg was and still is the hub of several roads which converge there. If you or your enemy are marching an army through that area, you or they are going to end up there sooner or later, possibly at the same time. Even if it's not your end target (the ANV was on the way to Harrisburg), you'd better control the crossroads on your flanks, and G-burg stands out on a map like a sore thumb as an intersection you'd better hold.

    • @fldinosaur
      @fldinosaur 9 років тому

      Yep

  • @jeffbarbour571
    @jeffbarbour571 8 років тому +11

    I had two ancestors there. Both made it back to Virginia / West Virginia (stolen).

  • @VictorLepanto
    @VictorLepanto 11 років тому +2

    Lee's "audacity" was profligacy. He wasted his men for very little return. He should have followed the example of Washington & husbanded his men's lives. The reality is the South was continuously losing ground w/ occasional tactical florishes & successes. No one in that day would have done much different, but it was a foolish waste.

  • @gerrytyrrell1507
    @gerrytyrrell1507 4 роки тому +1

    Sedition was beaten that day ,at gettysburg.

  • @MrSting60
    @MrSting60 12 років тому +1

    Sir I have two daughters as traineer vets.What happened little top,cementry hill was poor by the Confderate army.

  • @johnnylongfeather3086
    @johnnylongfeather3086 Рік тому

    Good ‘ol Gettiz-Burg

  • @jlittle1998
    @jlittle1998 12 років тому

    Your comment sums up all wars, technology and advancements in arms always proceeds the tactics of the day. Even today in basic training (I can tell you as a vet), we still train for WWII style fox hole war fair, even though Urban Combat is the fighting style of the day today.

  • @stevierayc772
    @stevierayc772 7 років тому +1

    At 9:20 is that a helicopter model?

  • @thesmokingpope
    @thesmokingpope 11 років тому +1

    It's not left out of the movie so...

  • @ESPPsycho
    @ESPPsycho 12 років тому

    CHARLIEEE SHEEEEEEN

  • @jgrisso07
    @jgrisso07 11 років тому +2

    Uh huh....a man who has a long and happy marriage, spends lots of money and time promoting a better life for people compared to a man fighting to preserve slavery. Yeah, I pick Sheen.

  • @fredbazoo
    @fredbazoo 7 років тому +2

    After reading the endless comments about Trump (on other sites) and the ignorance and ridiculous state of mind of the majority of people.......Its refreshing to come here and read the thought provoking, and smart comments of the viewers here....

  • @carolbell8008
    @carolbell8008 4 роки тому

    Lee, the greatest general ever.🌺

  • @brianpoole4369
    @brianpoole4369 5 років тому +2

    Sam Elliot...a Texan....fighting for the north....if even as an actor...should have said..I want to be a confederate!!!

    • @Shatamx
      @Shatamx 4 роки тому +1

      John Buford was a Southerner though. He was from Kentucky.

  • @AstridVue
    @AstridVue 12 років тому

    Wha? Longstreet's wife didn't die early in the war at the time of their children and he did not remarry (until his wife did die in his 70s)! Mr. Foote! Well, glad to see even admirable historians like Shelby Foote don't always get it right but shame on the producers for including it in the documentary! Between that and Garnett's statement in the movie about which kids died from scarlet fever, the novice is going to have their facts so screwed up if they don't dig a little deeper.

  • @PHOTOGRAPHYBYDEREK1
    @PHOTOGRAPHYBYDEREK1 9 років тому +6

    good movie, but it was slowed and tainted by so much smarmy sentimentalism. the time wasted on those boorish scenes could have been better spent focusing on other parts of the battle, or better yet, a bigger part for George Meade, who had something like 20 seconds of screen time to deliver 3 lines.
    i mean, come on. he was the union general.

    • @borninjordan7448
      @borninjordan7448 9 років тому

      ***** And it was a 4 1/2 hour movie. I don't have TIME to watch it.

    • @andrelebaron
      @andrelebaron 9 років тому

      ***** I agree, it got a little over the top. I doubt longstreet ever said, "we should have freed the slaves, then declared war . . "

  • @MrSting60
    @MrSting60 12 років тому +1

    Great generals my arse.Sending soldiers into battle shoulder to shoulder and then standing sometimes thirty yards apart firing at each other.The motto of these so called great generals was "we have more men than you have bullets".

  • @gim10003
    @gim10003 11 років тому +1

    Love Martin Sheen, but this performance is so weak.

  • @TheTrueObelus
    @TheTrueObelus 11 років тому +1

    Tom Berringer was terrible in this movie. Sheen was quite good.

  • @michaelhenry8890
    @michaelhenry8890 2 роки тому

    Let is overrated

  • @williamparkes3256
    @williamparkes3256 9 років тому +1

    It's hard to take anything said by the voice of Charlie Sheen's father seriously.

    • @kellymcvey4494
      @kellymcvey4494 4 роки тому

      William Parkes shortly after the movie was made, Charlie was on a late night talks host saying some Very nasty things about his father. Martian comes out and to his son’s horror said “ Son, I’m going to kill you “, in his best General Robert E. Lee drawl!

  • @MyHenryco
    @MyHenryco 11 років тому

    Shelby; a great American! Sheen; a disgrace to the memory of General Lee!

  • @jeffbarbour571
    @jeffbarbour571 8 років тому +1

    GODs & GENERALS was a better movie than Gettysburg. I cannot stand to watch this movie Martin Sheen was terrible as General Lee. Shame they could not get Robert Duvall, who was EXCELLENT as R E Lee.

    • @Dempsey2626
      @Dempsey2626 8 років тому

      LOLOLOL. Gods and generals was one of the worst movies in the history of worst movies. They should burn every copy and put the fire out with a chain.

    • @jeffsmith2022
      @jeffsmith2022 8 років тому +2

      I like Gettysburg much more,just my opinion ...

    • @jeffbarbour571
      @jeffbarbour571 8 років тому +2

      I care for a grave in my home town of a soldier of the 8th Virginia Infantry who was wounded just ten feet from General Armistead. Joel Osborne Adams. Placed a new Iron Cross to his grave for the one stolen. I cut his grass and keep him covered with the flag he fought under.