Chevron Deference - What's All The Fuss About?

In this video, we'll look at the Supreme Court's recent decision to overturn Chevron deference and explore its significant impact on the trucking industry. But what exactly is Chevron deference?
Chevron deference is a principle derived from the 1984 Supreme Court case Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. This doctrine allowed federal agencies to interpret ambiguous laws. However, the Supreme Court's new ruling shifts regulatory power, giving judges the final say in law interpretation and limiting the authority of federal agencies.
How does this affect the trucking industry?
- Increased Litigation: Motor carriers (MCs) and owner-operators (O/Os) may find it easier to challenge federal regulations in court.
- Regulatory Uncertainty: Agencies may issue new regulations more cautiously, knowing they are more susceptible to judicial review.
- Operational Changes: Trucking companies might need to adjust operations to comply with new interpretations of regulations, affecting everything from speed limiters on vehicles over 26,000 pounds, electronic logging devices (ELDs) on pre-ELD trucks, to automatic emergency braking systems.
- Compliance Costs: The fluctuating legal landscape may result in varying compliance costs for carriers and owner-operators.
Stay informed and ahead of the curve by understanding these changes and their potential impact on your operations. Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more updates on trucking industry regulations and insights.
#ChevronDeference #TruckingIndustry #SupremeCourt
Learn more at aftdispatch.com
Call or Text [phone]
▶ DON'T CLICK THIS - bit.ly/2P2r1U7

[@truckingwithcliff]

It's not going to change ELD Mandate or this DEF garbage

[@A_A_Ron_G]

I believe common sense will prevail, and they'll not go through with the speed limiters mandate. The problem is not about slowing down a little to 68 or whatever number they propose. That's plenty fast enough for a 40 ton truck. The real problem is having every single truck going the same speed, until there's a hill. The lighter trucks will try to pass the heavier trucks, or vice versa on a downgrade. They won't quite get around, then the road will level out and neither truck will let the other pass. Now you have two trucks side by side for miles, with traffic backing up behind them. The road rage, tailgating, and resulting accidents will be catastrophic.

[@Adam-Woods]

Accurate. A lot of the pencil pushers in charge of legislation are ignorant to the reality their suggested changes will have.

[@Livestockhaulin]

How do we join the fight as truckers to counter legislation?

[@russellhix6802]

Stop driving until they make the changes we demand. Sadly you got to have money to pay your bills so you can’t afford to unite and protest. Imagine that………..

[@dangranot5703]

I don't see this as a good thing. We needed a better system for fighting regulation, but throwing out the entire regulatory framework was not the solution. Companies already ran rampant over the little guy, now they have carte blanche to spend as much money as they want to ensure they remain unregulated. Yeah we might see some crumbs as a side effect, but this decision impacts a lot more than DEF and hours of service rules. I hope the Supreme Court can cash in their vacation days because I don't see them taking one for a long time, now.

[@robertbunnell9590]

Owner op here why am I doing humiliating unconstitutional urine testing for the federal government

[@carloselizondo7671]

I live in Chicago and see cars going 80mph easy!!! And we need speed limiters? The big 3 in Detroit build cars that can't go fast enough.