When using AutoLinearFit on dual band, what are you selecting? For now my workflow for L-Extreme was using DBXtract, LinearFit Ha->OIII and NB Colour Mapper. I wonder if this will get better/similar results. Also I was always using StarX as first step, but it seems that if you use StarX on stretched image, it gives better result, which is not ideal for me. I hate having to stretch early in the processing stage. Thanks for video.
This is what Russel says, but I did a test and after stretching and removing stars with unscreen option, there was way less blemishes/artifacts in the starless image. Someone on PI forum suggested it so I did a test and sadly it works better on non-linear.
Well Im just saying that doing it this way leaves less junk, which Im not happy about since I always did StarX as first process, lol. There are workarounds but its PITA. There are going to be updates to Russ plugins/models soon hopefully it will be improved. My OIII images always have lots of bloat.
Completely agree. Have already added it to my saved icon list and to my starting project layout.
Thanks for the video but unfortunately the link does not work for me. Comes up wit "invalid request" ?
I changed it now to the Seti Astro homepage where you can copy the link right from the page.
When using AutoLinearFit on dual band, what are you selecting?
For now my workflow for L-Extreme was using DBXtract, LinearFit Ha->OIII and NB Colour Mapper.
I wonder if this will get better/similar results.
Also I was always using StarX as first step, but it seems that if you use StarX on stretched image, it gives better result, which is not ideal for me.
I hate having to stretch early in the processing stage.
Thanks for video.
STX should if possible be used in linear state right before stretching.
This is what Russel says, but I did a test and after stretching and removing stars with unscreen option, there was way less blemishes/artifacts in the starless image.
Someone on PI forum suggested it so I did a test and sadly it works better on non-linear.
@Pawel-rv1ek The whole point of Star Removal is that you can stretch them separately, so what is the point afterwards???
Well Im just saying that doing it this way leaves less junk, which Im not happy about since I always did StarX as first process, lol.
There are workarounds but its PITA.
There are going to be updates to Russ plugins/models soon hopefully it will be improved.
My OIII images always have lots of bloat.
Interesting video. What if you shoot OSC with an Antlia Triband RGB Ultra Filter with the SII band pass?
That is not NB anymore. This is more like UHC (Lightpollution). So you can't use a tool like this - process with an RBG Workflow.
Where's the section and comparison of LRGB data?
There is no possibility for palettes with LRGB - it is what it is - LRGB - full stop..,.,
Invalid link...
I changed it now to the Seti Astro homepage where you can copy the link right from the page.