FunnelVortex Modern battlefield titles seem to use TripAdvisor as a substitute for their art department, over saturated, colorful and with a focus on looking pretty.
Verdun would still work with amazing graphics too , like a verdun with battlefield graphics but it has nothing to do with graphics verdun is simply more realistic, but both games dont take away horror and immersion. Both games get the point across: war is hell , verdun has horrendous gore and battlefiled has screaming and explosions everywhere Both feel like ww1 in the end but verdun really takes the trophy for its realistic slow paced game.
Verdun's awesome, authentic WWI gameplay totally makes up for its lack of graphical polish in my book. One of the most entertaining online shooters I've played in a while. Can't wait to play Tannenberg.
Umer Ahsan lol it’s all good I also agree the player base is pretty small but it works for the type of game it is, I wouldn’t mind more players playing tho
Actually, no, the focus of this video is not graphics, and everyone already knows BF1 is superior graphic wise because verdun had 3 devs at the begining compared to EA and their budget
I cant agree more. I've invested too much time in the Mount & Blade series. All of my friends dont understand why, because it has bad graphics. However, i did convert a friends meaning about the game after letting him play for 30 minutes on my PC. How fun that people can switch opinions on something so quickly
Verdun was made by mostly 3 people and this was their first proper game. It started out as a browser game but evolved into what we got in the end. Thats pretty impressive when compared to all the money and work put into Bf1. Bf1 was really dissapointing to me because of this, I simply expected more detail and if not the same realism as verdun at least someting more ww1 aproppriate then Bf4 with ww1 skins and flashy graphics when such a small game as verdun did so much right.
I didn't expect them to make a hyper-realistic game. Based on the original trailer, i knew they would opt for more action over realism. Battlefield is a massive franchise that never has settled for realistic, and that's fine. The realism stuff is more of a niche market and that's clear from player counts in games like ArmA, Verdun, Day of Infamy, etc.
I never expected Bf1 to be the most realistic thing ever but Bf1942's gameplay was a better and more accurate ww1 game then Bf1. Bf1 was the same modern warfare run and gun arcade shooter which is totally fine and even very enjoyable. I just hoped that they would be more respectfull and tone down the michel bay shenanigans when making a game about the bloodiest and most pointless war in human history. They could have done worse though, at least they didn't portay germans as evil nazis while romanticizing the victors:)
Yes. Bf 1942 which is a ww2 game is a more accurate presentation of ww1 then Bf1 when it comes to gameplay, not the visual part ofc. There are more rifle action and the autoamted weapons are less OP. also the ww2 tanks aren't as OP in rough enviroment as Bf1 tanks. Bf1 is a modern warfare Bf3 or 4 style game with a ww1 skin dlc attatched. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing, but I expected more from a game claiming to be at least somewhat accurate if not 100% historical accurate hardcore dying simulator:)
I remember when everyone was excited for trench warfare when battlefield 1 was first announced in 2016 but when the game came out people found out it was a useless feature for players to use well if u still want trench warfare verdun executes this well
battlefield 1 really doesent seem like trench warfare at all but verdun actually looks like world war 1 where you sitting in the trenches and shooting and the maps are way more realistic in verdun
@@thisisgamelord2421 Agreed. If you even stick your head out of a trench in verdun for one sec, you may have your head taken off. I find myself in trenches 90% of the game
I think Verdun's graphical design is much more accurate for the setting. Battlefield seems to romanticise world war one, verdun gives a historic and accurate version of this.
i love verdun, not just for its authenticity, but also how the game works. in BF1, its like any other Triple A game, players running amok, no coordination whatsoever, but in Verdun, the unique game play forces you and other players/AI to line up in your trench, form and hold a line, push through no mans land, and rush Machine gun positions. once i was playing, and me and a community group were doing an event. i was to hold the left outer most trench. it was foggy, and i didn't expect any action, so you can imagine my surprise when i saw shapes moving in the fog. had at least 25 kills before i got over run. at first it was just a few burst here and there after we sent a runner down the trench-line to deliver the news of the attack, but soon i was panicking and straight up laying down fire everywhere. but back to the point, in Verdun, being a lone wolf is being a dead wolf, its made for players to line up and fire, not run around willy nillly.
I'm pretty disappointed that you didn't mention the difference in gore and authenticity in terms of battlefield wounds/deaths... Verdun has just about any other game beat in that department, in my opinion.
They have their own perks in their own right and their own targeted audiences. Verdun reflects the majority of the action in WW1 by having the battles in the trenches which is more accurate historically. The damage model forces players to be more careful and defensive. The only thing it’s missing is the marching early in the war. The gameplay is much more immersive. BF1 reflects the exciting and different places and is targeted for the mainstream gamer that’s been playing their formula for years. Damage model encourages the same tactics everybody’s been using in every battlefield game. In summary, play BF1 for a WW1 themed game. Play Verdun for a WW1 game.
Bob Higgins Well, even as a long time battlefield fan going on ten years, battlefield 1 just doesn't flow well with the type if game it wants to be. The weapons to me just don't work for that style. While the movement in battlefield has certainly improved, it feels like the gun play has gotten progressively worse since battlefield 3.
Julian Emir Prawira not really, bf1 has great gameplay, Verdun is a very realistic shooter, where as bf1 is a arcade styled shooter. Different games, different styles.
I feel like verdun is better. It has more muted colors, going along with the bland and drab feeling of a battlefield. The recoil of verdun is weak, but you’re a soldier who’s been trained to fire these guns and you’ve been firing them for awhile, so it makes sense that recoil would be at a minimum.
Derpy Pug :P really? I didn't talk about that because I honestly had no idea. None of the 2 servers available seemed to offer this. Is it a client side option?
Nick930 yea sort of. You have to hunt it down but it's worth it. Also if you watch dead players their characters sometimes roll around screaming in pain till they stop and lay still. Pretty disturbing but it's fricken awesome
MacGyver HD No, bf1 definately has its own feel and gameplay, even if they may look similiar from an observers perspective. Verdun ftw, though. I've put hundreds of hours in there :D
I would love it if the guns in Battlefield had realistic 1-2 shot kill damage. Unfortunately, the “community” consists of a bunch of crybabies who constantly complain guns are “overpowered” if they kill you in less than 800 shots. I’m really tired of it... I wish games like Verdun came to PS4.
Verdun is on Ps4, the playerbase is rather small but it is slowly growing back after it was on discount in the PS Store for several times, plus, in february a big console update will come bringing improvements already issued on PC
Comparing a game made by about seven historical accuracy oriented people to one that is made by a well-established company with a brand that runs for long years now. Obviously, Verdun will look less refined, but they keep touching it up! Give them the team and resources what Dice have and then we can talk.
I mean, BF1 is a Triple A title. It is prettier, and has a lot more visual polish. BF1 has better optimization, and the interface flows a bit better than Verdun (this has been remedied in large part). Verdun offers much more depth and is ultimately more compelling and interesting than BF1. BF1 is ultimately just another shooter with WWI stylings. Verdun is much more of an experience, and I ultimately consider it the better game.
Doom Guy verdun is just another wannabe simulator. No depth, you shot some one and dead, no question. Clunky af and overall lacking experience. All 3 people who actually enjoy it arent even theyre creators because they truely know its more pain playing it than drinking soap. Gmod with 1 health players is more comparable to this game than this game to ww1
Okay, so "generalization" isn't really an applicable word then. It's fair to say that the game is clunky in comparison to BF1, which is something that I already touched on. To say it lacks depth is silly. Verdun endeavors toward a degree of historical depth, which BF1 only ever attempts superficially. BF1 has the sheen of WW1 but, at its core, is ultimately indifferentiable from other BF titles. This is what makes Verdun more compelling to me, worthy of looking past its clunkiness, and ultimately my preferred choice. This is not to say that BF1 is necessarily a bad game. I've played and enjoyed it. It kind of depends on what you are looking for in a game. If you are looking for a dynamic shooter with WWI aesthetics but are willing to concede on historicity, then by all means, play BF1. You may find the one hit kills in Verdun irritating, but that is more akin to reality, and as such I'm more than willing to accept it. Verdun works differently because it is not a game that is intended to be played like your prototypical shooter. If that's what you are looking for, then don't pick up Verdun.
Doom Guy no i did not address the generalization claim but saying your typical shooter with a ___ coat is by far a great generalization for a game, especially battlefield which steers more from that AAA shooter setup. What historical depth included specifically in verdun that goes beyond good gun model and real maps/ battles? I dont know but you seem too as you enjoy it as much to here. Because beyond what kick you find in it it just seems like a hardcore teamdeath match on a drawn put cod map. Point and click shooters dont seem enticing let alone spot the target dirt edition. Sorry for ragging on.
Battlefield 1 excels with fast paced combat in open areas making great use of the weapons and vehicles of the time. Verdin excels on the classic feeling off ww1 trench combat and does it almost perfectly. Both are amazing games in their own areas and what they’re trying to go for
Battlefield one feels like a Hollywood movie glorifying the war whereas Verdun feels much more gritty and authentic so I can absolutely look past the graphics because it still does such a great job at pretty much everything else very good game especially for an indie dev
Verdun has recived some updates since then, lighting on the guns is way better, enviroment could use some fine tuning (more 3d less flat textures), shadows are a bit better, muzzleflashes are slightly better as well as grenades
bingo bongo In my opinion Verdun is still better. Battlefield 1 was a little too "pretty" for my taste. Verdun just has normal everyday lighting and graphics. It felt like WW1 to me
In Verdun If there would be some voicelines for actions happening like in BF1 and screams and the automatic artillery (probably) it would be PTSD inducing I think
Verdun is actually very fun. Idk why people automatically assume that it's a boring game when it's way more intense than most other shooters I've played.
Verdun is actually good because we sometimes go out on the field but sometimes its to risky. And yes you are sometimes in a trench but you can also not sit, you can clear trenches or take cover in them. And the maps are really big. And if you want the authentic experience, you can go to custom mode and play with bots, to have more best experience you can go to chat and type "/Setfillbots (Any number you want" for more men to fight in the battlefield. And Verdun even has some good details like dead horses, and corpses. Also you can also choose your own desired weapon by choosing your role. If you want a game that won't burn your Old PC then Verdun is the right game for that. So I don't see why people don't like verdun. And At least everything is free...except for Supporter edition. Also Verdun Is probably more realistic than Bf1. Probably because of trenches, dead horses, corpses, right weapon, no contrabands, right skin or uniform, better terrain, and before your player dies he screams because he is injured then he dies. And for the price.. well I guess its kinda expensive but bf1 is more expensive though. And Verdun has more better reloads. And don't forget, There are A lot of trenches back in WW1 so dont say Verdun is boring Because Verdun just became realistic. That's why Verdun is Good.
Gaius Studios Verdun is closer to feeling like WW1, but honestly its still way behind Battlefield. Its never gonna be able to shake its PUBG esque old graphics and needs to be updated into a new engine for it to work better.
Verdun is way better than BF1, because his gameplay is more realistic. I remember how my anger was growing after 5/6 hitmakers on the same random dude. Historically way more accurate, Verdun is also surprisigly very addictive ! And last but not least, Verdun has the best community. No insults, a lots of "GG", people get killed but take time to say "nice shot". In BF1, i only see an ocean of salt.
You should review this again, they had a massive sound and graphics overhaul since this video was made. I think Verdun might actually be up to par (within reason of course) to Battlefield with Verdun's grittier look making it not as "pretty" but more realistic.
I play both bf1 and Verdun I like both. When someone would ask me which one of these they should buy I would answer. It depends on what you want. When you want a less historical accurate game with a lot of action and Pritty graphics. Then Bf1 When you care a lot about historical accuracy then Verdun
Mate, I don’t think you’ve seen or heard a grenade go off, they don’t cause massive explosions or “explosion noises” like in battlefield one, they make a popping/cracking sound. Secondly, they do not make massive fireballs, they just make small flashes then throw up dirt. Last but not least, they don’t leave massive crates like battlefield
I know I'm 3 years late, but when you asked about the 1911 weapon model for verdun being more detailed and what details in particular were added, verdun included the extractor part in the weapon model while battlefield its completely missing
Just imagine if Verdun was made by a big company. Everything was the same, all the mechanics stayed the same but the graphics were remade and made much more realistic.
Taktyczna Herbatka Oh trust me I’ve done that once. Cleared out a whole goddamn trench in Artois. When you know what you’re doing. You’re a god with that gun.
I just found verdun for 5 dollars on the ps store and God I wish more people played it.. literally only a lobby under all the time and that's it.. so sad because it's so much more entertaining then battlefield in my opinion
Mmh.. Wait a second. Battlefield have obviously a great graphic engine, one of the best. But Verdun are more realistic about the Playing and the Gun List. I think is better Verdun, Battlefield is too much far from the reality of the WWI, maybe with Red Orchestra Engine Verdun can be one of the best.
RO franchise has been being made on the iterations of Unreal Engine, while WW1 Game Series (Verdun-Tannenberg) is made on Unity Engine. Honestly, I think RO has both better graphics and better optimization. But I also know that some Unity games like Escape from Tarkov achieved wonderful graphics, so I guess there is still possibility of improvement in graphics in WW1 Game Series.
I dont really have the same opinnion with you, cause I think that Verdun looks good. No it doesn't Look as good as Bf1. But I personaly like Verduns graphics, they create unique looking game experience. And I also think that Verdun is More hardcore than BF 1.
bf1 certainly is beautiful, i watched a no hud vid of trench warfare and i was blown away at how realistic the mayhem and carnage looked. yet beauty only runs skin deep, and i couldnt help but feel like i was playing battlefront reskin. I havnt played verdun but it kind of reminds me of red orchestra 2 but a bit stiffer movement. definatly more authentic gameplay than bf1
Verdun is basically more realistic and better than battlefield the slow reloading, the one shot kill, and better experience to the real happenings of ww1 so I give a thumb's up for Verdun.
They honestly left out a lot of gun detail in BF1, such as the 1911 being the later production model, and leaving out key points of the pistol like stuff as simple as the plunger in the rear.
I would say that the muzzle flash in Verdun is more realistic because when you're behind a rifle, you really 1. Aren't gonna be paying attention to it and 2. You aren't gonna notice because, well, you're in combat and you just heard a very loud bang and felt recoil
You've obviously never handled a rifle before lmao. The only thing you see is a big flash, if that. It certainly doesn't linger or sparkle like the ones in BF1
Adolf H. That's true, but, in Verdun the flash is really low quality and doesn't look really realistic... Same in BF1 of course, but at least it visualy looks better there!
Bf1 can be very immersive if u have people who play tactically and use concept like suppressing fire, bounding and support by fire, the problem online most ppl are just running and gunning.
The not aiming downsights with a gas mask, both games sort of hit the opposite end of the keel.. BF fully prevents it whereas Verdun allows you to do it with only the aesthetics such as dirt etc to make aiming harder.. I feel there’s a perfect middle ground out there somewhere.
I just realized this was 3 years ago, Verdun has really good graphics now and its much improved, if only i had the pc to run it at more than medium/low graphics
bought and played battlefield 1 recently and I was really disappointed with it. Bolt actions in BF1 are pointless dispite being the main weapon of the war. What people are getting wrong with Verdun is that it's 1 shot kill but actually someone might get shot and they respawn but the character they were playing as is writhing on the ground in pain. Not dead but unable to continue fighting.
Battlefield was never realistic like Verdun. Battlefields main selling point is when you jump out of a plane and destroy a tank with a few sticks of dynamite. Besides their fanbase wouldn't like a game similar to Verdun. look I have played both games with more than 100 hours on them they are both good. It's just that a "true" WW1 setting would not work in battlefield...
I think Verdun is more realistic generally, but man do the grenades do a lot better in a destructive environment. I have so many stories from quickly forming my own foxhole to blowing an entry into a previously impassable building. Good stuff
Gun nut here. While the extra detail in Verdun's Colt 1911 model is more accurate than BF1's, they both have more realistic models than the other and both of them mishandle an animation here and there. One other thing I wanna point out; WW1 scopes really are as good as they are in BF1 and in Verdun it's as though the soldier doesn't allow himself proper eye relief
It is true that this is a m1911a1 as their is a comfort bulge on the back of the m1911's grip*Being a distinctive feature between the two* had not existed in the time of bf1 as the m1911 is or *was* a fairly new firearm in ww1 times but the time gap between ww1 & ww2 was enough to make sleight improvements to the gun thus the *m1911a1* which was used through ww2,korean war & the Vietnam war even still being used today...
Now, I don’t mind BF1, in fact, I like it a lot. However, Verdun feels… Right. When you charge an enemies position and see the gas rolling over a hill, the immersion is total. It is not an impressive game from a technical standpoint so what makes it unique is that it actually manages to capture the experience of the war realistically without making it feel forced. BF1 is a wonderful title but it’s also such a normal shooter that the visuals simply can not change the fact that it’s setting is basically just a fancy skin whereas Verdun actually completely drowns you in its world.
Verdun's muzzle flash is underwhelming, but actually fairly realistic. Because in real life a lot of guns that don't have the firepower comparable to ( for e.g ) a .44 Magnum, do not leave a fireball like the Bar does in BF1, and instead little sparks come out and some smoke. It is fairly underwhelming, but also pretty realistic.
No i agree with you 100%. But the muzzle flash they DID include looks terrible. There's like.. 5 sprites that show up and it looks like something out of a 90s game. If you're gonna put muzzle flash in, then it better look like Battlefields
It's a shame I can't afford a proper pc to play verdun, I did however play it on PS4 and love it, the down side is that not many people are playing it. Only on the rarest occasions can I get into a full lobby and play it. More people need to get it. I definitely recommend it to anyone who isnt sure if it's worth it. It's is if more people start playing it
the BAR'S animation in Verdun was wrong, the BAR operates from an open bolt, so it couldn't go forward after he pulled it back, he would have to push it forward or just leave it there and the bolt will lock forward automatically when u fire a shot
To be honest I think Verdun’s “lesser” graphics works in its favor. It captured the cold, raw, depressing, and bleak nature of WWI pretty well.
FunnelVortex Modern battlefield titles seem to use TripAdvisor as a substitute for their art department, over saturated, colorful and with a focus on looking pretty.
Verdun is just a game to feel like a soldier during WW1
That is true
Verdun feels more ww1
Verdun would still work with amazing graphics too , like a verdun with battlefield graphics but it has nothing to do with graphics verdun is simply more realistic, but both games dont take away horror and immersion. Both games get the point across: war is hell , verdun has horrendous gore and battlefiled has screaming and explosions everywhere
Both feel like ww1 in the end but verdun really takes the trophy for its realistic slow paced game.
Verdun's awesome, authentic WWI gameplay totally makes up for its lack of graphical polish in my book. One of the most entertaining online shooters I've played in a while. Can't wait to play Tannenberg.
Josh Yeah, same!
Tannenburg is out but in the early access stages
Josh yep
Verdun is full of campers soldiers in ww1 would storm out of their trench only to get killed by German machine gun both verdun and bf1 sucks
@@adolfhitler8739 only 4 soldiers in a team can be sniper in verdun
A ww1 game with bf1 graphics and the historical accuracy of Verdun.
A dream
martial arts,music and history I’d buy verdin but the graphics are putting me of and I don’t want to waste 15 pound
@@dids9169 just don't get on this shitty thing called CONSOLES
Umer Ahsan it’s not
Umer Ahsan lol it’s all good I also agree the player base is pretty small but it works for the type of game it is, I wouldn’t mind more players playing tho
Tyrone Peterson the creators of verdun said that PS4 update is coming soon on December and Xbox update just came out
Also you didnt point out the deaths, in verdun when people get shot you can see them screaming and crying out the ground while they are trying to move
What? Mine is not doing that.... Is there a setting or something?
@@livinghistory9701 Turn on gore
Yea and the player models have a higher quality with gore turned up
I can handle gore very well but verdun is kinda different
@@akasrkin9366 Also limbs and heads get shot off
you cant say Verdun has a better graphic, its hard to beat EA in that, but i see verdun is more realistic and that makes is special
But it has inferior graphics compared to battlefield 1 which is fact.
And i agree that verdun is realistic; however, the focus of this video is graphics
Dice*
Actually, no, the focus of this video is not graphics, and everyone already knows BF1 is superior graphic wise because verdun had 3 devs at the begining compared to EA and their budget
Reichtangle mapping Victor actually yes the focus of this video is graphics because if you read the desc, you would know
Talking about graphics? Here i am still playing the original Mount & Blade from time to time xD
Graphics are no match for good gameplay :)
I cant agree more. I've invested too much time in the Mount & Blade series. All of my friends dont understand why, because it has bad graphics.
However, i did convert a friends meaning about the game after letting him play for 30 minutes on my PC.
How fun that people can switch opinions on something so quickly
same here brother ! MW Warband still rocks ! Cant wait to get bannerlord 2 !
Best M&B Bannerlordul
I love the Napoleonic dlc
Verdun - made by two people for other people to have fun
Battlefield - made by a huge company for profit
Unselles yeah, I'm sure Verdun wasn't made for profit AT ALL
Lovro Jova Verdun was originally free online game, so it wasn't, at least not originally.
Unselles ...But it was. Because they switched it so they could earn revenue. I can promise you they planned to charge eventually
Nick930 It doesn't really matter, it's a remarkable job. They deserve the money.
It doesn't matter? It broke your whole "point". And now you just agree that every company exists for making profits. And good, that is right.
Verdun was made by mostly 3 people and this was their first proper game. It started out as a browser game but evolved into what we got in the end. Thats pretty impressive when compared to all the money and work put into Bf1. Bf1 was really dissapointing to me because of this, I simply expected more detail and if not the same realism as verdun at least someting more ww1 aproppriate then Bf4 with ww1 skins and flashy graphics when such a small game as verdun did so much right.
I didn't expect them to make a hyper-realistic game. Based on the original trailer, i knew they would opt for more action over realism.
Battlefield is a massive franchise that never has settled for realistic, and that's fine. The realism stuff is more of a niche market and that's clear from player counts in games like ArmA, Verdun, Day of Infamy, etc.
I never expected Bf1 to be the most realistic thing ever but Bf1942's gameplay was a better and more accurate ww1 game then Bf1. Bf1 was the same modern warfare run and gun arcade shooter which is totally fine and even very enjoyable. I just hoped that they would be more respectfull and tone down the michel bay shenanigans when making a game about the bloodiest and most pointless war in human history. They could have done worse though, at least they didn't portay germans as evil nazis while romanticizing the victors:)
Gentlesir PancakeBottoms Bf1942 was a more accurate ww1 game, is that what you said...?
Yes. Bf 1942 which is a ww2 game is a more accurate presentation of ww1 then Bf1 when it comes to gameplay, not the visual part ofc. There are more rifle action and the autoamted weapons are less OP. also the ww2 tanks aren't as OP in rough enviroment as Bf1 tanks. Bf1 is a modern warfare Bf3 or 4 style game with a ww1 skin dlc attatched. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing, but I expected more from a game claiming to be at least somewhat accurate if not 100% historical accurate hardcore dying simulator:)
Gentlesir PancakeBottoms this... with that in mind verdun shits on bf 1
I remember when everyone was excited for trench warfare when battlefield 1 was first announced in 2016 but when the game came out people found out it was a useless feature for players to use well if u still want trench warfare verdun executes this well
there is no better game to have trench warfare then Verdun
battlefield 1 really doesent seem like trench warfare at all but verdun actually looks like world war 1 where you sitting in the trenches and shooting and the maps are way more realistic in verdun
@@Dwagonier battlefield one had to be at the east front, that was mostly mobile warfare
@@thisisgamelord2421
Agreed. If you even stick your head out of a trench in verdun for one sec, you may have your head taken off. I find myself in trenches 90% of the game
idk operations on somme is pretty crazy
Verdun has the most accurate representation of wearing a real gas mask of the era.
I think Verdun's graphical design is much more accurate for the setting. Battlefield seems to romanticise world war one, verdun gives a historic and accurate version of this.
You know guns really are shiny, scopes really are clear, and France in 1916 wasn't black and white. Battles were fought on beutifal days sometimes.
i love verdun, not just for its authenticity, but also how the game works. in BF1, its like any other Triple A game, players running amok, no coordination whatsoever, but in Verdun, the unique game play forces you and other players/AI to line up in your trench, form and hold a line, push through no mans land, and rush Machine gun positions. once i was playing, and me and a community group were doing an event. i was to hold the left outer most trench. it was foggy, and i didn't expect any action, so you can imagine my surprise when i saw shapes moving in the fog. had at least 25 kills before i got over run. at first it was just a few burst here and there after we sent a runner down the trench-line to deliver the news of the attack, but soon i was panicking and straight up laying down fire everywhere. but back to the point, in Verdun, being a lone wolf is being a dead wolf, its made for players to line up and fire, not run around willy nillly.
I'm pretty disappointed that you didn't mention the difference in gore and authenticity in terms of battlefield wounds/deaths... Verdun has just about any other game beat in that department, in my opinion.
Spaßsoldat you watch Random Madness too?
Indeed!
Spaßsoldat *HOWEVER*
@@DakotaofRaptors *THEY ARE ISSUES*
Both are amazing games that I enjoy playing!
If battlefield we're a 10
Then Verdun would be a 7. In my opinion.
All graphics goes to BF1 but all gameplay goes to Verdun IMO
They have their own perks in their own right and their own targeted audiences.
Verdun reflects the majority of the action in WW1 by having the battles in the trenches which is more accurate historically. The damage model forces players to be more careful and defensive. The only thing it’s missing is the marching early in the war. The gameplay is much more immersive.
BF1 reflects the exciting and different places and is targeted for the mainstream gamer that’s been playing their formula for years. Damage model encourages the same tactics everybody’s been using in every battlefield game.
In summary, play BF1 for a WW1 themed game. Play Verdun for a WW1 game.
Bob Higgins Well, even as a long time battlefield fan going on ten years, battlefield 1 just doesn't flow well with the type if game it wants to be. The weapons to me just don't work for that style. While the movement in battlefield has certainly improved, it feels like the gun play has gotten progressively worse since battlefield 3.
Julian Emir Prawira not really, bf1 has great gameplay, Verdun is a very realistic shooter, where as bf1 is a arcade styled shooter. Different games, different styles.
I feel like verdun is better. It has more muted colors, going along with the bland and drab feeling of a battlefield. The recoil of verdun is weak, but you’re a soldier who’s been trained to fire these guns and you’ve been firing them for awhile, so it makes sense that recoil would be at a minimum.
You should do it again as verdun got a graphic update
He didn't talk about the gore but the gore in Verdun can be set to a level where soldiers can get their limbs blown off and their bones will stick out
Derpy Pug :P really? I didn't talk about that because I honestly had no idea. None of the 2 servers available seemed to offer this. Is it a client side option?
Nick930
yea sort of. You have to hunt it down but it's worth it. Also if you watch dead players their characters sometimes roll around screaming in pain till they stop and lay still. Pretty disturbing but it's fricken awesome
Nick930 it’s really immersive
PedowithAspeedo Random Madness?
@@JimBo5ive that's what I watched my dead character do on my friends screen after it died
Im playing BF1, but Verdun is more realistic. Bf1 is a BF4 with Ww1 setting no more.
MacGyver HD No, bf1 definately has its own feel and gameplay, even if they may look similiar from an observers perspective. Verdun ftw, though. I've put hundreds of hours in there :D
plays more like battlefront.
Gamepelay of Bf1 and bf4 are different
Kill_ Switch115 no u
Kill_ Switch115 tf bf1 literally is unrealistic af. Verdun is great because of its authenticity and tight gameplay. Bf1 is more of a ww2 game
you should redo this comparison since Verdun has had large overhauls of updates since
Yeah and it looks much better now
I would love it if the guns in Battlefield had realistic 1-2 shot kill damage. Unfortunately, the “community” consists of a bunch of crybabies who constantly complain guns are “overpowered” if they kill you in less than 800 shots. I’m really tired of it... I wish games like Verdun came to PS4.
i love generic run and gun games with bullet sponge damage models that don’t require you to think
igloo productions hey it is on ps4 I bought it it’s 20 dollars
Deutchen Soldaten I have it too!
Verdun is on Ps4, the playerbase is rather small but it is slowly growing back after it was on discount in the PS Store for several times, plus, in february a big console update will come bringing improvements already issued on PC
igloo productions if u want realistic gameplay in BF1 play hardcore servers.
Comparing a game made by about seven historical accuracy oriented people to one that is made by a well-established company with a brand that runs for long years now. Obviously, Verdun will look less refined, but they keep touching it up! Give them the team and resources what Dice have and then we can talk.
I mean, BF1 is a Triple A title. It is prettier, and has a lot more visual polish. BF1 has better optimization, and the interface flows a bit better than Verdun (this has been remedied in large part). Verdun offers much more depth and is ultimately more compelling and interesting than BF1. BF1 is ultimately just another shooter with WWI stylings. Verdun is much more of an experience, and I ultimately consider it the better game.
Generalization of the century
What am I generalizing? Do explain.
Doom Guy verdun is just another wannabe simulator. No depth, you shot some one and dead, no question. Clunky af and overall lacking experience. All 3 people who actually enjoy it arent even theyre creators because they truely know its more pain playing it than drinking soap. Gmod with 1 health players is more comparable to this game than this game to ww1
Okay, so "generalization" isn't really an applicable word then. It's fair to say that the game is clunky in comparison to BF1, which is something that I already touched on. To say it lacks depth is silly. Verdun endeavors toward a degree of historical depth, which BF1 only ever attempts superficially. BF1 has the sheen of WW1 but, at its core, is ultimately indifferentiable from other BF titles. This is what makes Verdun more compelling to me, worthy of looking past its clunkiness, and ultimately my preferred choice. This is not to say that BF1 is necessarily a bad game. I've played and enjoyed it. It kind of depends on what you are looking for in a game. If you are looking for a dynamic shooter with WWI aesthetics but are willing to concede on historicity, then by all means, play BF1. You may find the one hit kills in Verdun irritating, but that is more akin to reality, and as such I'm more than willing to accept it. Verdun works differently because it is not a game that is intended to be played like your prototypical shooter. If that's what you are looking for, then don't pick up Verdun.
Doom Guy no i did not address the generalization claim but saying your typical shooter with a ___ coat is by far a great generalization for a game, especially battlefield which steers more from that AAA shooter setup. What historical depth included specifically in verdun that goes beyond good gun model and real maps/ battles? I dont know but you seem too as you enjoy it as much to here. Because beyond what kick you find in it it just seems like a hardcore teamdeath match on a drawn put cod map. Point and click shooters dont seem enticing let alone spot the target dirt edition. Sorry for ragging on.
Battlefield 1 is like movie, Verdun is like document. I play both and i love both.
Verdun is a game that feels and plays like a WW1 battlefield, battlefield 1 is a game that looks and feels like a reskinned WW2 game
Verdun is realistic gameplay 1 bullet your dead! Battlefield1 you can survive a tank shot 😂
Kayley Varley It’s not realistic when it comes to trigger discipline in reloading.
You can't survive a tank shot in bf1, do you even play any of these games?
@@хле6-ц8б well, u can survive a grenade xD
@@TheTimoprimo Trigger discipline wasn't teached until the 60's, because of the lack of training i guess.
@@naiopiaio7125 depends on where its been thrown
Battlefield 1 excels with fast paced combat in open areas making great use of the weapons and vehicles of the time. Verdin excels on the classic feeling off ww1 trench combat and does it almost perfectly. Both are amazing games in their own areas and what they’re trying to go for
More like rarely deployed prototypes in the case of BF1 but yes, still a great shooter.
@@Arcaryon More like never deployed
I like the sniping scope on VERDUN.
Yeah
Battlefield one feels like a Hollywood movie glorifying the war whereas Verdun feels much more gritty and authentic so I can absolutely look past the graphics because it still does such a great job at pretty much everything else very good game especially for an indie dev
Verdun has recived some updates since then, lighting on the guns is way better, enviroment could use some fine tuning (more 3d less flat textures), shadows are a bit better, muzzleflashes are slightly better as well as grenades
Yet the small indie one is way better than the huge budget one
this is a graphic comparison
bingo bongo In my opinion Verdun is still better. Battlefield 1 was a little too "pretty" for my taste. Verdun just has normal everyday lighting and graphics. It felt like WW1 to me
Keep up the quality content you have talent
Meubel
You must have low standards.
smoke hazard how so
@@enricom02
Cause it's just a split screen graphical comparison of two games.
bf1 is your ww1 cartoon type game, but Verdun actually has that true trench warfare experience
In Verdun If there would be some voicelines for actions happening like in BF1 and screams and the automatic artillery (probably) it would be PTSD inducing I think
Gasmask in bf1 does not have filter and fixture to head, so its totally useless
Matouš Plaček yeah it looks like he just smacks it on
@@deutchensoldaten8959 *SPLAT*
Battlefield 1 in terms of fun.
Verdun for ww1 realism
Verdun is actually very fun. Idk why people automatically assume that it's a boring game when it's way more intense than most other shooters I've played.
@@mugdhachowdhury5984 no no believe me verdun is very boring
f.m. 03 it’s fun to hear you’re comrades scream in pain.
@white shark Trench warfare is boring you just sit in the trenches most of the time
Verdun is actually good because we sometimes go out on the field but sometimes its to risky. And yes you are sometimes in a trench but you can also not sit, you can clear trenches or take cover in them. And the maps are really big. And if you want the authentic experience, you can go to custom mode and play with bots, to have more best experience you can go to chat and type "/Setfillbots (Any number you want" for more men to fight in the battlefield. And Verdun even has some good details like dead horses, and corpses. Also you can also choose your own desired weapon by choosing your role. If you want a game that won't burn your Old PC then Verdun is the right game for that. So I don't see why people don't like verdun. And At least everything is free...except for Supporter edition. Also Verdun Is probably more realistic than Bf1. Probably because of trenches, dead horses, corpses, right weapon, no contrabands, right skin or uniform, better terrain, and before your player dies he screams because he is injured then he dies. And for the price.. well I guess its kinda expensive but bf1 is more expensive though. And Verdun has more better reloads. And don't forget, There are A lot of trenches back in WW1 so dont say Verdun is boring Because Verdun just became realistic. That's why Verdun is Good.
Verdun wins
Gaius Studios Verdun is closer to feeling like WW1, but honestly its still way behind Battlefield. Its never gonna be able to shake its PUBG esque old graphics and needs to be updated into a new engine for it to work better.
Umm.... No
Mr.DarkBright H E L L O
Gaius Studios Except in trigger discipline.
MrHeckler you can't just "change" engine
Verdun is way better than BF1, because his gameplay is more realistic. I remember how my anger was growing after 5/6 hitmakers on the same random dude.
Historically way more accurate, Verdun is also surprisigly very addictive !
And last but not least, Verdun has the best community. No insults, a lots of "GG", people get killed but take time to say "nice shot". In BF1, i only see an ocean of salt.
Really liking your videos just binge watched couple of them.
you earned a sub, like, and comment for the great quality of your videos. Keep up the work
Can't believe you have under 1,000 subscribers. Nice video man, keep up the good work.
Bullet Physics no
Wait
Eat
You should review this again, they had a massive sound and graphics overhaul since this video was made. I think Verdun might actually be up to par (within reason of course) to Battlefield with Verdun's grittier look making it not as "pretty" but more realistic.
Playing verdun makes you really good at playing battlefield
I play both bf1 and Verdun I like both.
When someone would ask me which one of these they should buy I would answer.
It depends on what you want.
When you want a less historical accurate game with a lot of action and Pritty graphics. Then Bf1
When you care a lot about historical accuracy then Verdun
Quality video 👍
Mate, I don’t think you’ve seen or heard a grenade go off, they don’t cause massive explosions or “explosion noises” like in battlefield one, they make a popping/cracking sound. Secondly, they do not make massive fireballs, they just make small flashes then throw up dirt. Last but not least, they don’t leave massive crates like battlefield
I know I'm 3 years late, but when you asked about the 1911 weapon model for verdun being more detailed and what details in particular were added, verdun included the extractor part in the weapon model while battlefield its completely missing
Just imagine if Verdun was made by a big company. Everything was the same, all the mechanics stayed the same but the graphics were remade and made much more realistic.
Fun fact: Verdun was made by about 10 People
Lower
when u have MP 18 in "Verdun" you are One Man Army XD
DJJP PL rip through the whole damn enemy trench
I mean.. it was designed as a weapon for trench raids.
I agree, but at the same time, the fact that you need to bring that MP-18 close enough to the enemy kinda balances that out.
Taktyczna Herbatka Oh trust me I’ve done that once. Cleared out a whole goddamn trench in Artois. When you know what you’re doing. You’re a god with that gun.
Irl it would probably jam halfway through and it was heavy
I just found verdun for 5 dollars on the ps store and God I wish more people played it.. literally only a lobby under all the time and that's it.. so sad because it's so much more entertaining then battlefield in my opinion
on my ps4 several people play it.
Mmh.. Wait a second.
Battlefield have obviously a great graphic engine, one of the best. But Verdun are more realistic about the Playing and the Gun List.
I think is better Verdun, Battlefield is too much far from the reality of the WWI, maybe with Red Orchestra Engine Verdun can be one of the best.
i agree i think the gameplay has a bigger affect on the game compared to the graphics
RO franchise has been being made on the iterations of Unreal Engine, while WW1 Game Series (Verdun-Tannenberg) is made on Unity Engine. Honestly, I think RO has both better graphics and better optimization. But I also know that some Unity games like Escape from Tarkov achieved wonderful graphics, so I guess there is still possibility of improvement in graphics in WW1 Game Series.
Verdun needs more players all of you guys buy both Tannenberg and Verdun realism in this game is awsome
It’s so crazy verdun was made by maybe 50 when battlefield took hundreds and both are great games
So far I know Verdun was made by only 10 people
Verdun started off with 3 developers, I don't know how many there are now though.
You know video games needs more WW1 games
Verdun makes you feel like you are actually in WW1, Battlefield 1 makes you feel like you are in the WW1 that movies depict
If you can actually find a full and fair game of Verdun it's super good, otherwise....
The scope in Verdun doesn't zoom the entire screen. That's pretty cool.
It's more realistic
Yeah, but in a gameplay view i don't feel comfortable, that's why i prefer the Battlefield 1 snipers
You never realise that Verdun has flaws until someone points them out
Totally agreed!
I think the jankiness of verdun helps the atmosphere
Dude. You sound like the voice actor for jack in jack in the box commercials. Right on
Verdun is a good game. It has realistic recoil and movement but battlefield one has a better reload mechanism with more possibilities for players.
Id rather have "lesser graphics" and a historically accurate game than somthing that is high graphics and not historically accurate
If you want a action game battlefield 1. More authentic verdun.
I dont really have the same opinnion with you, cause I think that Verdun looks good. No it doesn't Look as good as Bf1. But I personaly like Verduns graphics, they create unique looking game experience. And I also think that Verdun is More hardcore than BF 1.
bf1 certainly is beautiful, i watched a no hud vid of trench warfare and i was blown away at how realistic the mayhem and carnage looked. yet beauty only runs skin deep, and i couldnt help but feel like i was playing battlefront reskin. I havnt played verdun but it kind of reminds me of red orchestra 2 but a bit stiffer movement. definatly more authentic gameplay than bf1
Chuck Aule "Verdun gore review" look it up.
Verdun is basically HLL but ww1
Thank you so much for this video
Verdun is basically more realistic and better than battlefield the slow reloading, the one shot kill, and better experience to the real happenings of ww1 so I give a thumb's up for Verdun.
Verdun = Realism
Battlefield 1 = Graphic
Both games are fun in their own ways.
I think this needs a revisiting, Verdun has come a long way.
Verdun is so much better gameplay wise
I don't think realism equals better gameplay, but to each their own.
Verdun gameplay is clunky AF to be honest
Verdun and BF1 are 2 very different games. One is a triple A game that takes about 10 mins to complete a match. But Verdun can take up to an hour.
A match of conquest in BF1 is actually about 30 min each
Julian Emir Prawira are you kidding? I had a match of frontlines that lasted for an hour and a half.
Verduns graphics are more than enough for a good experience
They honestly left out a lot of gun detail in BF1, such as the 1911 being the later production model, and leaving out key points of the pistol like stuff as simple as the plunger in the rear.
I would say that the muzzle flash in Verdun is more realistic because when you're behind a rifle, you really 1. Aren't gonna be paying attention to it and 2. You aren't gonna notice because, well, you're in combat and you just heard a very loud bang and felt recoil
No, in fact you even argued my case for me, it's more realistic
Adolf H. Most certainly not more realistic. Sorry that you're in denial.
You've obviously never handled a rifle before lmao. The only thing you see is a big flash, if that. It certainly doesn't linger or sparkle like the ones in BF1
True, there is no fire when you shoot a real gun, just smoke
Adolf H. That's true, but, in Verdun the flash is really low quality and doesn't look really realistic... Same in BF1 of course, but at least it visualy looks better there!
Bf1 can be very immersive if u have people who play tactically and use concept like suppressing fire, bounding and support by fire, the problem online most ppl are just running and gunning.
The not aiming downsights with a gas mask, both games sort of hit the opposite end of the keel.. BF fully prevents it whereas Verdun allows you to do it with only the aesthetics such as dirt etc to make aiming harder.. I feel there’s a perfect middle ground out there somewhere.
Ithink Verdun is limited by it's game engine. If it is created in unreal, then I believe it would be a match with battlefield.
Battlefield looks like a propaganda movie and Verdun looks like war footage
I just realized this was 3 years ago, Verdun has really good graphics now and its much improved, if only i had the pc to run it at more than medium/low graphics
Give verdun a big budget it would be better than bf1
I think they’re both awesome games that had a go at making a game about a lesser known time period in the gaming community
The BAR's charging handle isn't spring loaded, and since it's an open bolt design the charging handle would not reset unless by force.
bought and played battlefield 1 recently and I was really disappointed with it. Bolt actions in BF1 are pointless dispite being the main weapon of the war.
What people are getting wrong with Verdun is that it's 1 shot kill but actually someone might get shot and they respawn but the character they were playing as is writhing on the ground in pain. Not dead but unable to continue fighting.
Battlefield was never realistic like Verdun. Battlefields main selling point is when you jump out of a plane and destroy a tank with a few sticks of dynamite. Besides their fanbase wouldn't like a game similar to Verdun. look I have played both games with more than 100 hours on them they are both good. It's just that a "true" WW1 setting would not work in battlefield...
I think Verdun is more realistic generally, but man do the grenades do a lot better in a destructive environment. I have so many stories from quickly forming my own foxhole to blowing an entry into a previously impassable building. Good stuff
you should do this again, verdun's graphics have improved loads since this video.
I understand this is a visual comparison but the audio is recorded from these actual real world counterparts thanks to C&Rsenal just its interesting
Verdun is more realitistic, guns actually kill people 😂 if yk what i mean, then you feel my pain in most fps shooters lmao
Did he just slap the gasmask on his face...? In BF1?
Gun nut here. While the extra detail in Verdun's Colt 1911 model is more accurate than BF1's, they both have more realistic models than the other and both of them mishandle an animation here and there. One other thing I wanna point out; WW1 scopes really are as good as they are in BF1 and in Verdun it's as though the soldier doesn't allow himself proper eye relief
It is true that this is a m1911a1 as their is a comfort bulge on the back of the m1911's grip*Being a distinctive feature between the two* had not existed in the time of bf1 as the m1911 is or *was* a fairly new firearm in ww1 times but the time gap between ww1 & ww2 was enough to make sleight improvements to the gun thus the *m1911a1* which was used through ww2,korean war & the Vietnam war even still being used today...
Gope this helped any confusion
Amazing video
Verdun has come a long way in three years. You should compare the two now to see how much Verdun has improved.
Verdun is more historically accurate, Battlefield is like an alternate reality where WW1 takes place in the 1920s
Now, I don’t mind BF1, in fact, I like it a lot. However, Verdun feels… Right.
When you charge an enemies position and see the gas rolling over a hill, the immersion is total. It is not an impressive game from a technical standpoint so what makes it unique is that it actually manages to capture the experience of the war realistically without making it feel forced.
BF1 is a wonderful title but it’s also such a normal shooter that the visuals simply can not change the fact that it’s setting is basically just a fancy skin whereas Verdun actually completely drowns you in its world.
Verdun died while BF1 still has thousands playing
@@gtas321 So? Doesn’t change the fact that Verdun is a superior WW1 shooter while BF1 is more like a fantasy of a WW1 era.
The 1911 in bf1 is missing the extractor.
Verdun's muzzle flash is underwhelming, but actually fairly realistic. Because in real life a lot of guns that don't have the firepower comparable to ( for e.g ) a .44 Magnum, do not leave a fireball like the Bar does in BF1, and instead little sparks come out and some smoke. It is fairly underwhelming, but also pretty realistic.
No i agree with you 100%. But the muzzle flash they DID include looks terrible. There's like.. 5 sprites that show up and it looks like something out of a 90s game.
If you're gonna put muzzle flash in, then it better look like Battlefields
What he did was a Graphics Comparison not a Realism Comparison
It's a shame I can't afford a proper pc to play verdun, I did however play it on PS4 and love it, the down side is that not many people are playing it. Only on the rarest occasions can I get into a full lobby and play it. More people need to get it. I definitely recommend it to anyone who isnt sure if it's worth it. It's is if more people start playing it
Verdin is pretty much almost exact to WWI with bad graphics and bf1 is a fast paced unrealistic shooter also based in WWI
the BAR'S animation in Verdun was wrong, the BAR operates from an open bolt, so it couldn't go forward after he pulled it back, he would have to push it forward or just leave it there and the bolt will lock forward automatically when u fire a shot
my dream game is a ww1 game with the historical acuracy of verdun and the gameplay and presentation of battlefield 1
They had a update that really increased graphics you should check it out