Road Test: 2017 Ford Escape - Escapism

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 46

  • @Mojo522
    @Mojo522 6 місяців тому +1

    3 weeks ago, I bought a fully loaded Metallic Ruby Red, Titanium, 2.0 eco-boost, 4WD w/ black leather interior. 53k as of now. I've already taken my first road trip to CT to chase waterfalls. I'm freakin' loving it.

  • @mitch4527
    @mitch4527 Рік тому +2

    I have a 2017 Escape SE with the 1.5 liter four cylinder. I bought it new in late 2016 and it now has 69K Miles. I love it - perfect for squirting around NYC and Long Island traffic. I didn’t need the 245 hp motor because there’s nowhere around here where the roads are open enough and in good enough shape to justify the extra cost. Overall, a great car.

  • @Mr_Chris77
    @Mr_Chris77 7 років тому +12

    Just bought the 2017 SE with the 2.0 and AWD. I'm getting 0-60 times in the six second range. It's a pretty damn quick vehicle with the 2.0. Thirsty too.

  • @bighunter5476
    @bighunter5476 7 років тому +23

    not bad,,, keep it up ford

  • @craigmerkey8518
    @craigmerkey8518 7 років тому +15

    I enjoy mine Titanium in White!

  • @lucasworktv
    @lucasworktv 2 місяці тому

    One of the best compact suvs from it’s time 😊

  • @F0RDMU5TANGB0I_06
    @F0RDMU5TANGB0I_06 11 місяців тому +2

    0:35 YOU JUST GOT RICKROLLED!!!!! 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @aayonce4
    @aayonce4 7 років тому +9

    why did they omit the hands free lift gate from being standard ??? the escape was the first with it

    • @canddmeyer
      @canddmeyer 7 років тому +2

      To keep the price down. It's standard on the Titanium & optional on the SE. It is not available on the S model.

    • @aayonce4
      @aayonce4 7 років тому

      zip89105 so is SE the equivalent of the SEL on the edge? or does the escape have an SEL model as well i know older ones did. but still i feel like thag shoukd be standard frok SE and uo

    • @canddmeyer
      @canddmeyer 7 років тому

      Sorry, I don't know the equivalent to the Edge.

  • @swanblake
    @swanblake 7 років тому +4

    Wow I take it those were all season tires on that 0-60?

  • @ktkof04
    @ktkof04 7 років тому +22

    If a car with an 85mph 1/4 trap speed is "too much engine" for some of your crew, you might need to replace them.

    • @Snake-ms7sj
      @Snake-ms7sj 6 років тому +3

      It only got that poor 1/4 mile time because of all the wheel spin they were getting at take off. Looks like thier test track was slick as heck. Other testers have gotten a 0-60 mph of 7.0 to 7.2 secs with FWD and a little quicker with AWD. Should be getting a 1/4 mile speed of around 92 mph or so.

  • @aayonce4
    @aayonce4 7 років тому +1

    The quarter mile shows where the Escapes power is... down low so take offs from the lights should be fun in the 2 liter turbo

  • @rotart12arx3
    @rotart12arx3 7 років тому +1

    As with the 2017 Ford Fusion Sport review and the Escape, they keep putting regular gas in them. The 2 liter is rated at 245 HP with premium fuel. You lose about 9 HP dropping down to 87 octane.

  • @cjiekel668
    @cjiekel668 6 років тому

    My grandmother loves her new 2017 Escape titanium awd with ecoboost

  • @SloansDroneZone
    @SloansDroneZone 2 роки тому +1

    0:36 - 0:44
    Did they just soft rickroll us with that music?

  • @canddmeyer
    @canddmeyer 7 років тому +1

    Interesting how tests turn out. While the MotorWeek 0-60mph was slower than other tests I've read, the braking was much shorter than the other tests, and a 107ft average for a 60-0mph stopping distance is excellent! I might be driving one of these before the month is over.

    • @ponygt6629
      @ponygt6629 7 років тому +1

      this was FWD model, so 60 was hit by just 7.6s that too because the TCS of Ford does allow drag strip runs, but change the stock tires and it will hit 60 in 6.8-7.0 s

    • @canddmeyer
      @canddmeyer 7 років тому

      The FWD probably explains the braking distance & 0-60mph. Did u notice smoke from the tailpipe? It was either a cold day or that test vehicle is driven hard.

  • @misamisatv
    @misamisatv 7 років тому

    Wonder how it does on the IIHS small overlap

    • @canddmeyer
      @canddmeyer 7 років тому +1

      Acceptable!

    • @chass6166
      @chass6166 6 років тому +1

      above average 3.5 stars, reliability,,,
      5 stars on all accounts except roll over 4 stars which is par for SUV's most only get 3 stars on rollovers. But Escape is on a Focus platform so the reason for 4 stars that cat. at least 2018 models.

  • @ethankimsey7189
    @ethankimsey7189 4 роки тому

    I test drove one very nice car so much fun to drive it’s definitely a quick little car so much fun lol

  • @JuanJose-cf8ps
    @JuanJose-cf8ps 7 років тому +3

    Put some better tires on it and I'm sure it'll do a lot better 0-60 and quarter mile!

  • @leespeyrer8424
    @leespeyrer8424 7 років тому +1

    you should see how cheaply made the parts and connections are under the hood, not for me

  • @thecraighouse9246
    @thecraighouse9246 7 років тому

    I got the wife a 15 SE 2.0 4WD, I like it but I wouldn't buy it again. Lack of locking 4WD, poor automatic, and intrusive stability control. Give me a manual, and a real switch for the TC/stability, then I would look at upgrading, otherwise this is the last escape for me.

  • @kmart3697
    @kmart3697 6 років тому +1

    KUGA

  • @DrDennis
    @DrDennis 7 років тому

    It only took me one FORD in my lifetime to sour me forever. NO MORE!

  • @jdmjimmy
    @jdmjimmy 5 років тому

    The old escape is better

  • @hondatrix
    @hondatrix 7 років тому +3

    Called the Escape so you can be sure when it catches fire, you have a chance....

  • @swanblake
    @swanblake 7 років тому +1

    I don't get why the American car companies ever update their product. Their fan base is so u informed about the competition the they buy Ford, GM, or Dodge just based on whichever union there uncle belongs too. As John said they could of kept it the same and every hillbilly would line up to buy this because it's a Ford

    • @goobagel
      @goobagel 7 років тому +11

      never*
      products*
      uninformed*
      that*
      their*
      to*
      could have*
      I apologize if you aren't a native English speaker, but it's kind of ironic that you call Americans uninformed.

    • @goobagel
      @goobagel 7 років тому +5

      MRT Exactly. Why perpetuate a stereotype that isn't even true?

    • @seanm7553
      @seanm7553 5 років тому

      They just work.

  • @musclerocker
    @musclerocker 6 років тому

    I had a 2007... IT SUCKED ...... very cheap looking

  • @kawasabi1
    @kawasabi1 7 років тому

    Only thing I don't like is the annoying noises the car makes when you get in.

  • @landyachtfan79
    @landyachtfan79 7 років тому +1

    2:59.........."And some aggressive pulling to the side on initial braking keeps the results from being perfect." Bet there would have been NO aggressive pulling to the side on initial braking had this road test been of a CR-V, RAV4, or CX-5 (ya know, JAPANESE CUV's/SUV's)!!!!!!!!! Remind me again what Ford stands for.............oh, yeah, Fix Or Repair Daily!!!!!!!

    • @justabagel5173
      @justabagel5173 7 років тому +8

      yea have a few fords in the family crown vic with 311k a sable with 290k original engine and trans .

    • @Justimann1
      @Justimann1 7 років тому +3

      1996 ford f150 straight 6, 2000 ford explorer v6. both great vehicles.

    • @justabagel5173
      @justabagel5173 7 років тому +1

      had that same truck same year sold it regret it .

    • @MrAquinas1
      @MrAquinas1 7 років тому

      Landyachtfan79: When all you know about cars amount to clichés, please don't post comments.

    • @seanm7553
      @seanm7553 5 років тому

      Most Americans don't like the styling of the Japanese SUVs. Fords are more luxurious and 90 percent of the buyers are women.

  • @bretandorf1091
    @bretandorf1091 7 років тому +2

    I think it's ugly. There are much more compact SUVs out there.