The Forgotten Bomber that Saved WW2 - The Tu-2

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 лют 2025
  • As the Germans got closer to Russia, the desperate Soviet Air Force top officials finally admitted they needed help from the nation's most famous aircraft designer: Andrei Tupolev.
    As with many Russian engineers and scientists of the era, the problem was that Tupolev was in prison for crimes against the Red State.
    Designed from a prison cell, the twin-engine dive bomber was a machine unlike any other, with many combinations of armament and weaponry depending on the mission.
    Intrinsically built as a high-speed daylight and frontline bomber, the Tu-2 was so versatile that it contributed to various missions, including air-to-air combat, interception, ground attack, close-air support, and ISR or intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance.
    Introduced right in the middle of World War 2, the Tu-2 quickly became one of the most successful warplanes of the era, an essential part of the Red Army's fight against the once invincible Third Reich, and ultimately, a forgotten icon of the Soviet Air Force…
    ---
    Join Dark Skies as we explore the world of aviation with cinematic short documentaries featuring the biggest and fastest airplanes ever built, top-secret military projects, and classified missions with hidden untold true stories. Including US, German, and Soviet warplanes, along with aircraft developments that took place during World War I, World War 2, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Cold War, the Gulf War, and special operations mission in between.
    As images and footage of actual events are not always available, Dark Skies sometimes utilizes similar historical images and footage for dramatic effect and soundtracks for emotional impact. We do our best to keep it as visually accurate as possible.
    All content on Dark Skies is researched, produced, and presented in historical context for educational purposes. We are history enthusiasts and are not always experts in some areas, so please don't hesitate to reach out to us with corrections, additional information, or new ideas.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 445

  • @claritaturbo
    @claritaturbo 2 роки тому +71

    Who knew?
    If you design something like your life depends on it, it will end up being iconic!

    • @DavidM-tg1oy
      @DavidM-tg1oy 2 роки тому +7

      @ClaritaTurbo
      Yes it will, but there ARE better incentives!

    • @stankygeorge
      @stankygeorge 2 роки тому +3

      Great thought!

  • @LB-oz9hv
    @LB-oz9hv 5 місяців тому +3

    Despite its rough finish it was a beautiful looking aircraft, I had the pleasure of seeing them close up in Warsaw Poland. The aircraft continued operations long after the war and received the NATO definition BAT.

  • @AlbertComelles1970
    @AlbertComelles1970 2 роки тому +31

    Excellent, thank you very much! Just one mishap in 5' 14'', the nazis invaded the USSR in June 1941, NOT in June 1942.

    • @nedludd7622
      @nedludd7622 2 роки тому +1

      That happens often on this channel.

    • @wynnsimpson
      @wynnsimpson 2 роки тому

      Yes. 1941. June 22

  • @ImpossiblyBlack
    @ImpossiblyBlack 2 роки тому +114

    The strange looking TU-2 in the thumbnail is an experimental version used to test a crude way of surviving impacts with barrage balloon cables. A special cable woven from high tensile steel was run from one reinforced wingtip to the other via a nosecone that extended about 20 feet ahead of the nose.

    • @ThePenitentOne
      @ThePenitentOne 2 роки тому +11

      Thnk u. Was wondering what kind of of TU-2 is that

    • @laco9838
      @laco9838 2 роки тому +4

      @@ThePenitentOne i think it was some kind of radar test
      i could be wrong tho

    • @DaveSCameron
      @DaveSCameron 2 роки тому +2

      Where did you get this information from Sir?

    • @Justanotherconsumer
      @Justanotherconsumer 2 роки тому +6

      Definitely not compensating for anything.

    • @jeffbybee5207
      @jeffbybee5207 2 роки тому +1

      I was guessing it was ment to act like a jousting knight. Don't need ammunition just spear the German planes

  • @edwardgaspar5428
    @edwardgaspar5428 2 роки тому +267

    The true soviet experience. Being very famous and forced to work from prison for that very state.

    • @Dillonkg1
      @Dillonkg1 2 роки тому +23

      So the American prison system would qualify

    • @Sacto1654
      @Sacto1654 2 роки тому +9

      But not just any prison. The prison Tupolev worked from had far nicer facilities than the average Soviet prison of the time, and Tupolev showed his design genius with the Tu-2 light bomber.

    • @facelikedog
      @facelikedog 2 роки тому +23

      I try to see other sides. Andrei Nikolayevich Tupolev lived to the ripe age of 84, died in his sleep after an evening with his gigantic family. It's hard to find much info on the Beria/Stalin era, but he loved travelling, and visited many countries as a high ranking member of the soviet science community. No doubt he had a GUM card as a member of the party, and here in Canada, we'll soon need the same from the liberal party. The Tu-95 still roams the skies though, and contrary to popular belief, it is a very capable aircraft to this day, due to continuous upgrades and refits, kinda like the B-52 in that regard. Cheers.

    • @plazmaguy13yago9
      @plazmaguy13yago9 2 роки тому +10

      @@Dillonkg1 nope

    • @garybobst9107
      @garybobst9107 2 роки тому +11

      The m-1 carbine was designed by a guy in Federal prison.

  • @pistitoth1363
    @pistitoth1363 2 роки тому +3

    Édesapám keresztapja volt TU-2 toronylövész , és Míg- 21 Alumínium önvény makett generációs játék ! Várom esetleges unokát melynek átaadom ,!

  • @sim.frischh9781
    @sim.frischh9781 2 роки тому +60

    I cannot help but wonder what Tupolev would have achieved if he had left the USSR and fled to the West, starting his own aircraft design enterprise just like Sikorsky did.
    His competence and understanding are second to none of his peers.

    • @davefroman4700
      @davefroman4700 2 роки тому +14

      Excuse me? This was not his only contribution to Russian Aviation. And despite what you may think there is no lack of engineering expertise in Russia. They have toys the US cannot match today. Not only in aviation, but in hypersonic missiles as well.

    • @FranciscoPartidas
      @FranciscoPartidas 2 роки тому

      One can't understand why in the world those guys accepted to work for the state than imprisoned them. If I was Tupolev, I would defect to the west ASAP

    • @xavierrodriguez2463
      @xavierrodriguez2463 2 роки тому +7

      he achieved a lot in the Soviet Union ???

    • @sim.frischh9781
      @sim.frischh9781 2 роки тому +12

      @@xavierrodriguez2463 ​ @Dave Froman Guys, you got me wrong, i do not doubt he achieved a LOT in USSR, my point was that he could have achieved MUCH MORE pretty much anywhere else.

    • @nikoladd
      @nikoladd 2 роки тому +11

      @@sim.frischh9781 it doesn't work like that. There are many great aircraft, built by extremely talented designers, that failed in the west(no demand/politics and so on). Just because you have talent, doesn't guarantee you success.

  • @sandordombi7262
    @sandordombi7262 2 роки тому

    Hey, the story, the historical punctuallity but also the voice is incredible for me! Lot`s of Thanks!

  • @jimgaul67
    @jimgaul67 Рік тому +1

    Never knew about this and I consider myself a WW2 buff….. well done!

    • @PanzerChicken69
      @PanzerChicken69 Рік тому +2

      Well lol, in your defence: the Canadian PM doesn't even know who fought who in WW2 so...

  • @lewisray2697
    @lewisray2697 2 роки тому +1

    Old soldiers never die, they just fade away.

  • @robbierobinson8819
    @robbierobinson8819 Рік тому

    I thought I knew most of the significant aircraft of WW!!, but this is the first I heard of the TU-2. It was, like the Mosquito and P38 Lightning, a very pretty aircraft. Thank you for this episode.

  • @dereklucero5785
    @dereklucero5785 2 роки тому +8

    Nice plane. I hadn’t even heard of it until this excellent video. I guess I had never thought that the russkies had bombers, which was extremely shortsighted on my part.

  • @oneshotme
    @oneshotme 2 роки тому

    Enjoyed your video and so I gave it a Thumbs Up

  • @dougmcdonald3977
    @dougmcdonald3977 Рік тому +1

    As shown on your images, the Tu-2 had radial engines, not V-12's , and its top speed was about 342 mph, not 380. Its rival, the Pe-2 ,was produced at 10 times the rate of the Tu-2. However it was an outstanding design both as a light bomber and as a night fighter.

    • @alexandervapnyar3979
      @alexandervapnyar3979 Рік тому

      The original Tu-2 were indeed driven by the liquid cooled AM-37 and had a top speed of 600 kph (380 mph). But because AM-37 production plants were needed for AM-38 engines that were used by IL-2 Stormovik, the Tu-2 production was first ceased and then restarted with air cooled radial M-82 (ASh-82). That version was slower but had a bigger bombload.
      Pe-2 looked similar to Tu-2 because it was designed basically by the same people. Petlyakov worked for Tupolev until the latter’s arrest. However, Pe-2 wasn’t a direct competitor to Tu-2. It was much smaller, could carry just a half of of the Tu-2 bombload and in real life the difference in top speed was negligent.

  • @michaelnaven213
    @michaelnaven213 2 роки тому +57

    The Sturmovik overshadowed the Tu-2 but the Tu-2 was an excellent weapon.

    • @AlexanderTch
      @AlexanderTch 2 роки тому +7

      They are planes of diffferent kinds and different tasks and can't be compared. Shturmovik is ground attack strike plane and Tu-2 is tactical bomber capable to do dive bombing

    • @polakrodak8538
      @polakrodak8538 2 роки тому +3

      Different types of planes. One is a bomber made to bomb German cities the other is a CAS aircraft

    • @alexandervapnyar3979
      @alexandervapnyar3979 Рік тому

      It’s not even “apples and oranges”, it’s “apples and burgers”. Completely different types of aircraft. Besides, real IL-2 and IL-2 of Soviet propaganda and video games are different things too.

  • @randysoong6129
    @randysoong6129 2 роки тому

    Awesome! First time learning about this solid aircraft.

  • @Knuck_Knucks
    @Knuck_Knucks 2 роки тому

    Ok. This craft has escaped me until now. Thanks!

  • @Deviation4360
    @Deviation4360 2 роки тому +5

    Few western twin engined aircraft of this era are as beautiful as the Tu-2. The Beechcraft Grizzly is almost a direct copy (arrival at same concept). Perhaps the DeHavilland Mosquito/Hornet, the On Mark A-26, and Howard 350 (nose wheeled) , P-38 (prototype), F7F, Kawasaki Ki-96, Breda Ba. 88, and PBM-1 Mariner are close contenders for said beauty contest, each in their own right. Almost forgot the XP-67 Moonbat.

    • @wdtaut5650
      @wdtaut5650 Рік тому +1

      The French had many similar aircraft that equaled, or surpassed, the Tu-2 for looks. Their service lives were so short we just never hear of them. It's all a matter of taste: Amiot 354, Bloch MB-170, Breguet 693, LeO 451, Potez 633

    • @Deviation4360
      @Deviation4360 Рік тому

      @@wdtaut5650 No I totally agree, the SNCASO SE.100, CAPRA R.40, Bugatti 100 et. al. It seems that the P-38 lines were a minimum standard design aesthetic for all their twins. But then again there's the Potez 75 and the Loire 130 😲

    • @alfonsfalkhayn8950
      @alfonsfalkhayn8950 3 місяці тому

      ....let's omit the germans, they are in a totally different league!

  • @Thomas-pq4ys
    @Thomas-pq4ys 2 роки тому +3

    I never knew about this aircraft. Very impressive.

    • @thesnazzycomet
      @thesnazzycomet 2 роки тому

      Very similar to the mosquito regarding its reputation. Still, I recommend checking out the Pe-2 as well

  • @jirihamersky6152
    @jirihamersky6152 2 роки тому

    Excellent channel, excellent video, nothing to comment. Just thanks. I have to subscribe.

  • @alm5992
    @alm5992 2 роки тому +21

    The Tu-2 may carry only half the weight of the TB-3, but it was 2.5 times faster, smaller and much more lethal!

  • @allgood6760
    @allgood6760 2 роки тому

    Thanks for this 👍

  • @Tiagomottadmello
    @Tiagomottadmello 2 роки тому +1

    Great vídeo 👍🏻👍🏻

  • @snappy452
    @snappy452 2 роки тому +1

    Can't wait to see them break these out in a few months.

  • @garycopeland2678
    @garycopeland2678 2 роки тому +1

    At approximately 5:20 into this video, the narrator makes a mis-statement saying "In June of 1942, the [German invasion began] "... That happened in June of 1941. But I really like this video and didn't know this much about the Tupolev 2 before seeing this .. it must have been a very valuable asset to the Russian military at that time.

    • @Nonicknameleftforme
      @Nonicknameleftforme 2 роки тому

      Dark Skies is joke. He has mistakes in every single video. Mostly in the technical data, but also in the historical facts.

  • @LarsAgerbk
    @LarsAgerbk 2 роки тому +9

    considering the number of aces the Luftwaffe had, it's hard to believe that so few of these planes were downed.

    • @philipambler3825
      @philipambler3825 2 роки тому +3

      Ultra provided the targets position, so the TU2s could hit and run from a longer distance than the Sturmovic..

    • @LarsAgerbk
      @LarsAgerbk 2 роки тому

      @@philipambler3825 what's Ultra?

    • @LB0355
      @LB0355 2 роки тому

      You can't take German's aces kill count at their word also. A lot of times they were inflated, either during the war for propaganda or as post-war myths and hearsays

    • @LarsAgerbk
      @LarsAgerbk 2 роки тому +3

      @@LB0355 I'll believe what I want to believe thankyou very much. The Luftwaffe didn't believe the magnificense tallies of Eric Hartman either. They even send planes along with him to see if he was lying. Turned out he didn't.

    • @LB0355
      @LB0355 2 роки тому

      @@LarsAgerbk or so they say...

  • @AndyNyle
    @AndyNyle Рік тому

    my grandfather services these during WW2. I met some of his friends who flew the mission but they never talked about war.

  • @64maxpower
    @64maxpower 2 роки тому +6

    Another most important plane of WW2. I'm sure fought in the most important battle of WW2. With the most decorated men

    • @AlexanderTch
      @AlexanderTch 2 роки тому

      It fought even against USA during Korean war in early 50s.

  • @thumpbuy
    @thumpbuy 2 роки тому

    Great channel

  • @Justanotherconsumer
    @Justanotherconsumer 2 роки тому +2

    Would love to see a video on the XP-79 Flying Ram.
    It’s just so wacky.

  • @Wolfen443
    @Wolfen443 2 роки тому +2

    Wonderful Soviet design, despite the problems its creators and the aircraft had been manufactured

  • @USSRBot
    @USSRBot 2 роки тому +12

    I got a Tu-2 as a beta plane in War Thunder and love it.

    • @Goatfer
      @Goatfer 2 роки тому

      It is kinda broken, probably why it was only a beta reward. It has a higher bomb load then the Pe-2 and B-25 at the same B.R.

    • @vikingpowered868
      @vikingpowered868 2 роки тому +1

      Got it as well. Best Tu-2 in the game.

    • @USSRBot
      @USSRBot 2 роки тому +1

      @@vikingpowered868 Just used it in my 4.7 ussr tank line up and got a few tanks heheh

    • @AgirA2
      @AgirA2 2 роки тому

      The Tu-2 in War Thunder is op and meta especially for squadron battles. Complete menace

  • @keatonburton5636
    @keatonburton5636 2 роки тому +2

    Sir, your content is an honor to watch.

  • @dutchman7216
    @dutchman7216 2 роки тому +1

    I hope you do one on the IL-2.

  • @Conn653
    @Conn653 2 роки тому +4

    Are there any examples of this aircraft still remaining and flyable?

    • @rodneypayne4827
      @rodneypayne4827 2 роки тому

      There are many static survivors around the world in various versions. Tu2s were supplied to the Warsaw Pact countries during the late 40s and 50s. The last in service were North Korean, North Vietnam and China during the 60s and 70s as night raiders. Many are found in museums in eastern Europe. Currently no Tu2s are in flying condition.

  • @mohammedsaysrashid3587
    @mohammedsaysrashid3587 2 роки тому

    A Wonderful introducing video aboutTu-2 USSR designed airplanes

  • @fredweller1086
    @fredweller1086 2 роки тому +3

    1800 HP engines? Nice power-to-weight ratio.
    Pilots like that.

  • @Wolverines77
    @Wolverines77 2 роки тому

    A sleek, snazzy looking aircraft...

  • @GEMerc-su4cc
    @GEMerc-su4cc 2 роки тому +5

    While the Tu-2 I'm sure was excellent in it's own right, it was outshined and out produced by the Pe-2 and Il-2

  • @matthewkabanuk443
    @matthewkabanuk443 2 роки тому +1

    Red Skies: *post new video*
    Also Red Skies: *_procedes to change thumbnail and title of said video 7 times_*

  • @ChodaStanks
    @ChodaStanks 2 роки тому

    1. Manpower
    2. Lend-Lease
    3. Manufacturing power

  • @bartfoster1311
    @bartfoster1311 2 роки тому +1

    Reminds me of the Mosquito and served many of the same roles.

  • @tnsampson2
    @tnsampson2 2 роки тому +1

    Gee, over 46 sorties over two months. Wow.

  • @cjclark2002
    @cjclark2002 2 роки тому

    0:08
    The face you make when the state asks you to build aircraft again ...

  • @oxcart4172
    @oxcart4172 2 роки тому

    I read that a few were imported into the UK for restoration a few years ago bit there's been no news since!

  • @yannekgallaun6329
    @yannekgallaun6329 2 роки тому +2

    Can you make a video about the Super Etendard please

    • @Justanotherconsumer
      @Justanotherconsumer 2 роки тому

      ¡Las Malvinas son Argentinas!
      Sorry, that just came out. Not sure why.

  • @kelvinchell9701
    @kelvinchell9701 2 роки тому

    I like listening to this guy.

  • @drmarkintexas-400
    @drmarkintexas-400 2 роки тому

    🏆🏆🏆👍🇺🇲🙏
    Thank you for sharing

  • @markelalagoz7363
    @markelalagoz7363 2 роки тому +2

    He has probably mistaken for the PE-2 with the liquid cooled V-12 engines

  • @gavrilo46
    @gavrilo46 2 роки тому +1

    Tu2 and Pe 2 best frontline bombers!

    • @DuneRunnerEnterprises
      @DuneRunnerEnterprises 2 роки тому

      Btw,Pe-2 wasn't anvisioned as a frontline bomber,but,as a heavy fighter !!!!
      That's why it's payload is so small !

  • @stankygeorge
    @stankygeorge 2 роки тому

    My history classes seemed to leave out many, many great Soviet weapons of WWII, and after, strange how that happens!

  • @TheDarkRodent
    @TheDarkRodent 2 роки тому

    The only reason to use an abbreviation like ISR and then say intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance would be to flex

  • @LarySeeAircraft
    @LarySeeAircraft 2 роки тому

    Tu-2sh would be a video that suits your Chanel (it had 88 guns in the Bombay for strafing)

  • @denniscashell2407
    @denniscashell2407 2 роки тому

    Love it

  • @thewise3551
    @thewise3551 2 роки тому

    Impressive stats for the time.

  • @Frankie5Angels150
    @Frankie5Angels150 2 роки тому

    Yes, when the enemy heard it was called the “Tutu” they died laughing.

  • @benroberts127
    @benroberts127 2 роки тому +12

    I love how Russia hasn't really improved their methods since then lol

    • @navyreviewer
      @navyreviewer 2 роки тому

      Well, they have stopped putting their engineers in labor camps to motivate them.

    • @TheWolfsnack
      @TheWolfsnack 2 роки тому

      ...if it works?

    • @TeMeRolEee
      @TeMeRolEee 2 роки тому +1

      @@TheWolfsnack Then they would've already captured Ukraine

  • @stanleybest8833
    @stanleybest8833 2 роки тому +5

    The Tupolev TU2 had many similarities to the P38, however it was somewhat more lifty. It would be hard to draw a bead on or stay on the tail of a TU2. The draggy pilot cowling was not a fatal flaw.

    • @eamonnmackinaw
      @eamonnmackinaw 2 роки тому +4

      That's just not at all true, the only comparison you could ever hope to draw between the two planes is their number of engines, nothing else

    • @LB0355
      @LB0355 2 роки тому +1

      They're so similar that their most distinctive features has nothing in common

    • @eamonnmackinaw
      @eamonnmackinaw 2 роки тому +1

      @@LB0355 they're so similar, that they're actually similar at all, and anyone that would try to argue otherwise is an absolute smoothbrain

    • @scapegoat762
      @scapegoat762 Рік тому

      1.They both have two engines.
      2. They both fly.
      End of similarities.

  • @stevenhoman2253
    @stevenhoman2253 2 роки тому +1

    As odd as it may seem, it looks as if the engines have NACA cowlings? How coincidental could that be?

  • @Ralphieboy
    @Ralphieboy 2 роки тому

    First flight report: "She's as sweet as Tupolev, honey!"

  • @bobstuart2638
    @bobstuart2638 2 роки тому

    The breathless delivery and dramatic music is about 80 years obsolete. Could not finish watching.

  • @SPak-rt2gb
    @SPak-rt2gb 2 роки тому +2

    Somebody should restore one to flying condition. Not a bad looking plane

  • @shannonterry4863
    @shannonterry4863 2 місяці тому

    War Eagles Air Museum in Santa Teresa, NM has a nice Tu-2 that was discovered in a Chinese cave that has been restored. Nice looking aircraft.

  • @detroitredneckdetroitredne6674
    @detroitredneckdetroitredne6674 2 роки тому +1

    Hello from Detroit Michigan USA Great video Brother thank you for sharing your knowledge and expertise and for taking us on your adventure through time and history

  • @DrFrankensteam
    @DrFrankensteam 2 роки тому

    Tu-2 vs Mosquito? Hmmm would like to see that!

  • @duncancargill6371
    @duncancargill6371 2 роки тому

    History, you can find it on the internet, you should try it some time!

  • @luckystriker7489
    @luckystriker7489 2 роки тому

    Probably not "tee you two", but in fact 'too two'. From the Russian Туполев два or Ту-два pronounced 'Tu dva'. I may be wrong. This is my last "acthually" pronunciation comment. I do like your videos

  • @mtacoustic1
    @mtacoustic1 2 роки тому +1

    Correct me if I'm in error, but I believe most of your photos of aircraft with the radial engines are TU-4s. I also believe a museum somewhere in Texas as a non-flying example.

    • @ivankrylov6270
      @ivankrylov6270 2 роки тому +3

      Tu-4 are copies of the B-29
      You might be thinking of the pe-2/3

  • @thorstenwanoth6774
    @thorstenwanoth6774 2 роки тому

    Awesome history1

  • @brucesumter4327
    @brucesumter4327 2 роки тому

    wow so cool i like all type aircraft's also bat 1 is so cooljust 3 people's on Board flying radio man also on the noise was the gunman?? that what look like??

  • @stevenhoman2253
    @stevenhoman2253 2 роки тому +1

    If you are indeed showing the correct aircraft, then it has an air cooled radial engine, and not a water cooled V12 engine. I have been really enjoying the series; however, my patience is tested when neither the words nor the pictures are matched up. Which is it, in this case? Is it a V!2 or a radial engine?

  • @Jbroker404
    @Jbroker404 2 роки тому

    One of my top choice for planes to be created in IL-2 Sturmovik: BoX!!

  • @AkiraNakamoto
    @AkiraNakamoto 2 роки тому

    The forgotten lend-lease aviation fuel that saved Tu-2 and WW2.
    Near 100% aviation fuel Soviet used during the Russo-German war was from lend-lease aid.
    Russian's refining technology was very bad at that time (It is not good even in nowadays). Low quality Russian fuel is okay for tanks and other ground vehicles because you can simply restart it once the engine is shut off due to bad fuel. However, you can't do that for airplanes in most cases. Here came the aviation fuel dependence on lend-lease aid.

  • @rogerrendzak8055
    @rogerrendzak8055 Рік тому +1

    "The TU-2 participated in operation 'Uranus'". Gee, I wonder where THAT, took place😏???

  • @fightingfalcon1986
    @fightingfalcon1986 2 роки тому +3

    Therefore, the Tupolev Tu-2 could be nicknamed the "Soviet Mosquito". Both were designed as high speed tactical bombers, but due to their versatility both were used in many roles, since battlefield reconnaissance and as a fighter bombers engaging with other fighters of the era.

  • @NuclearDisposalExpert
    @NuclearDisposalExpert 2 роки тому +1

    Please make a video on the great P47 thunderbolt. I would love to learn more on it

  • @davebritton7648
    @davebritton7648 Рік тому

    "Don't mess with my Tu-2." Stalin's famous message to Hitler in 1943.

  • @loganmerryman202
    @loganmerryman202 2 роки тому

    The Soviets definitely coined "we're all in this together"

  • @BlackwoodSlayer
    @BlackwoodSlayer 2 роки тому

    Operation Uranus 🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯

  • @minhthunguyendang9900
    @minhthunguyendang9900 6 місяців тому

    Why is it that it’s so similar to
    Petlyakov’s PE2 ?

  • @donaldconnolly220
    @donaldconnolly220 2 роки тому

    i like this plane...it fits in with our medium bombers. i can see. a26 c. ...in it....

  • @musoangelo
    @musoangelo 2 роки тому +5

    Water cooled V12 engines? It was powered by Powerplant: 2 × Shvetsov ASh-82 14-cylinder air-cooled radial piston engines, 1,380 kW (1,850 hp) each.

    • @huffy1949
      @huffy1949 2 роки тому

      The earliest versions were powered by the Mikulin AM-37 v-12. This proved unreliable and its production was cancelled, leading to the installation of the radial Shvetsovs.

    • @musoangelo
      @musoangelo 2 роки тому +1

      @@huffy1949 Thanks for the clarification. Most of the footage shown was of radial engines, that's why I googled it.

  • @thomaskolb8785
    @thomaskolb8785 4 місяці тому

    8:18 - that’s where Klaus lost his hearing.

  • @bananawatch8158
    @bananawatch8158 2 роки тому

    Germany being fought on two fronts and America supplying weapons and supplies to Russia, is how Russia beat Germany

  • @russellblake9850
    @russellblake9850 2 роки тому +2

    The Pe-2 was a much more significant dive bomber.

  • @olivierdk2
    @olivierdk2 2 роки тому

    Still no metric system ?

  • @normcameron2316
    @normcameron2316 2 роки тому +7

    I would love to hear Mr. Tupolev's feelings about the whole thing. Being jailed, then working on a project for your country. Working for the jailers but hoping for your country I guess.

    • @lllordllloyd
      @lllordllloyd 2 роки тому +4

      In an interview he said "I needed to breathe clean air for a while", a resigned response.
      Although the video shows a tiny prison cell, this was not really correct. The designers were removed from liberty but they were still designing, in very basic dorm-like conditions with their lives controlled closely... but still essentially doing their work and with access to all the facilities they needed to do that. Stalin wanted the planes, he didn't want intellectuals forming relationships and starting (in his paranoid mind) a counter-revolution. And he wanted everyone working at absolute maximum capacity, and used fear as a motivator.
      Incidentally, the Tu-2 was put in production early, then taken out of production due to the need to prioritise cheaper aircraft, then put back in production in 1944.

    • @LB0355
      @LB0355 2 роки тому +5

      Ask any American prisoner. According to a June 2022 report published by the American Civil Liberties Union, prison labor generates more than $11bn annually, with more than $2bn generated from the production of goods, and more than $9bn generated through prison maintenance services.

    • @TheWolfsnack
      @TheWolfsnack 2 роки тому

      @@LB0355 Except for that much of the prison industry, prison farms have been mostly eliminated by the late 19990's...meaning that prison became much more expensive and lost their ability to finance a lot of their own operations....in favor if massive catering corporations providing substandard fare.

    • @michaeld5888
      @michaeld5888 2 роки тому +1

      @@lllordllloyd One of the army Generals named Rosokovosky released to play a major part in the war had no teeth courtesy of a Stalin purge. This cosy view seems to be difficult to believe. I would imagine a lot of these people had to endure the rite of passage of a pretty thorough and efficient beating up in Lubyanka before any easing of restrictions to get work out of them. I doubt if much has changed since and Russia is what Russia was and Russia always will be. The specific political label adopted by the rulers at any particular time makes little real change in practical terms.

    • @AlexanderTch
      @AlexanderTch 2 роки тому

      @@michaeld5888 Where did you get that lie about his teeth? What historical document that tale teller provided? On almost all photos Rokossovsky is smiling and good white teeth are clearly visible. In 40s there were no any natural looking dental prothesis. Nobody tortured him there. that's lie. You blindly belive in any anti-Russian crap of your propaganda. Rokossovsky a couple years before war was commander of military district in Eastern Siberia near Baikal-lake/ On winter he ordered to do drills of his units including cavalry and ordered to go on ice of Baikal lake. Because Ice was slippery many horses fell down and broke legs, ribs etc. Siberian military district was important due to activity of Japan on Russian far east borders. So, military authorities considered that as deliberate satobage and Rokossovsky was prosecuted and put into prison. Though, he didn't want to do any sabotage of course. Yes, court was wrong but there were reason to suspect sabotage anyway. Lately, when new minister of state security Beria was assigned , he ordered to reconsider many cases including one of Rokossovsky and he was released becasue there were no facts of deliberate sabotage.

  • @jeffagain7516
    @jeffagain7516 21 день тому

    I've always liked the Russian people and their engineers and scientists have proven their brilliance time after time. Sadly they have also been plagued for generations with some of the most savage and paranoid leaders ever placed in power. They certainly don't have a monopoly on that type but they've had more than their share.

  • @drmoss_ca
    @drmoss_ca 2 роки тому

    2,257 Tu-2 were built, but 11,000 Pe-2. Now which one was the icon?

  • @MrNicoJac
    @MrNicoJac 4 місяці тому

    It's insane that the USSR built only slightly more than 1000 planes of their "best" bomber.
    Especially if you compare that to American production numbers....

  • @fresatx
    @fresatx 2 роки тому

    This aint got no gas in it!

  • @mikmik9034
    @mikmik9034 2 роки тому +1

    Tu\2, JU88, Mosquito, P38... I seem to see something here.

  • @dave8599
    @dave8599 2 роки тому +1

    The best Soviet bomber of the war was the B-25 Mitchell.

  • @JF-xq6fr
    @JF-xq6fr 2 роки тому

    Sounds like a Swiss Army knife of versatility had a baby with a Mosquito, Da?

  • @chrisskinner6291
    @chrisskinner6291 2 роки тому

    Secrets let's talk about the secret society at play in this like all other wars.

  • @margarita8442
    @margarita8442 2 роки тому

    The yak 42 was also a good plane

  • @terry_willis
    @terry_willis 2 роки тому

    I don't get it. Stalin imprisons Tupolev and then Tupolev starts designing planes for that maniac? He was still in prison! Not even released. WTF? What did I miss here?

  • @OgrabliatorKorovanov
    @OgrabliatorKorovanov 2 роки тому

    0:20 how the fuck do you imagine "designing from the prison cell"? man in dirty prison robe exhausted by wood chopping shift returns to his cell takes charcoal and starts scratching walls? It was not a "prison", it was research institute complex in Moscow with freedom restrictions for part of personnel. Of cource inmates could not leave territory, had to follow the shedule and most important had no certainity about future. But overall conditions were much better compared to common prisons

  • @konstantinbothari774
    @konstantinbothari774 2 роки тому

    Didn't know that Pinocchios father also made airplanes.

  • @ianmacfarlane1241
    @ianmacfarlane1241 2 роки тому

    TU-2 go brrrrrrrrrrrr