Administrative Law - Vavilov and the Supreme Court of Canada

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @RandyPass
    @RandyPass 4 роки тому +8

    Why is there music in the background?

    • @runnymedesociety1125
      @runnymedesociety1125  4 роки тому

      Unfortunately there was a bit of interference coming in through the mics when they were positioned in certain ways. We tried our best to reduce it but we weren't able to resolve it before the panel ended.

    • @RandyPass
      @RandyPass 4 роки тому

      @@runnymedesociety1125 Thanks for responding. Good panel nonetheless. Just makes listening with headphones challenging ;)

    • @almministrys1659
      @almministrys1659 5 днів тому

      Everything us about the money nothing is about God and allowing man and women to life in fellowship 🎉. It' seem so wrong when we don't have a clue what's above around about us just waiting to etc.

  • @bobelliott2748
    @bobelliott2748 10 місяців тому +1

    The Runnymede Society is very interesting. Full of law students who are full of passion and intelligence. Not a lot of wisdom or life experience but that will come. I'm an old guy who can follow the arguments (mostly). We need these people

  • @jeanmarcus9048
    @jeanmarcus9048 4 роки тому +3

    Vavilov is a good example of when the SCC provided clarity to the substantive review analysis in admin law

    • @Unnatural09
      @Unnatural09 3 роки тому

      Dunsmuir needs to be upgraded.

  • @Unnatural09
    @Unnatural09 3 роки тому +3

    When you need to write a new case law as an NCA candidate or you'll lose marks.

  • @maneetgiri25
    @maneetgiri25 2 роки тому +2

    Have NCA admin law exam next week. Trying to soak in the substantive review from all the sources. Thank you for your expert opinion on the case law. I am very much confident now.

  • @khankhan-dc9eo
    @khankhan-dc9eo 4 роки тому +1

    Its so funny the reaction on tax query

  • @RayLewisist
    @RayLewisist 4 роки тому +1

    That music in the background is unfortunate. I don't think this is really watchable.

  • @ve_rb
    @ve_rb 3 роки тому

    When the statute gives a right of appeal to the court the standard is correctness so I don’t know what that guy was saying wrt the broadcasting act

    • @olivierbishop-mercier8818
      @olivierbishop-mercier8818 3 роки тому

      statutory right of appeal means the court uses the rule in Housen v Nikolaisen. SOR is correctness for questions of law and 'palpable and overriding error' for questions of fact or mixed fact/law

    • @ve_rb
      @ve_rb 3 роки тому

      Of course but the way the legislature implements the SRA is always "person can apply for judicial review wrt questions of law"

    • @almministrys1659
      @almministrys1659 5 днів тому

      May I ask if canada courts are allowed to use united states case laws as referenced here in our courts also?

    • @ve_rb
      @ve_rb 5 днів тому

      @@almministrys1659 it’s “persuasive” but the Canadian courts aren’t bound to follow it like the ONSC is bound to follow the ONCA