Man With Multiple Priors Arrested Again for Stealing from Hoboken ShopRite

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 жов 2024
  • Around 5:22 on May 28, 2024, officers with the Hoboken Police Department were dispatched to a report of a shoplifting at ShopRite on 900 Madison Street. They entered the store around 5:35 PM and they walked upstairs to the loss prevention office. In the loss prevention office, they met with the store’s detective as well as the alleged shoplifter, who was identified as 36-year-old Alexander.
    The loss prevention official informed the officers that the man attempted to leave the store without paying for $187 worth of items. The officers placed Alexander under arrest for shoplifting. A search of his person revealed that he was in possession of prohibited items. He was handcuffed, searched, and escorted to the patrol car.
    Alexander was transported to the Hoboken Police Department for further processing. At police HQ, he was searched in more detail. He was charged with shoplifting under 2C:20-11B(2) and also charged under 2C:36-2. He was subsequently remanded to the Hudson County Correctional Facility.
    ----------------------------------------------
    Please LIKE, SUBSCRIBE, and consider supporting this channel (email us for more information). Donations will be used to acquire more public footage related to law enforcement activities.
    Our content is educational and in compliance with UA-cam's Fair Use Policy because we edit several long clips into a concise story. This is similar to other law enforcement channels on UA-cam. All videos and case documents were obtained pursuant to the New Jersey Open Public Records Act, N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1 et seq. (P.L. 2001, c. 404). Defendants are considered innocent until proven guilty.
    The New Jersey Supreme Court has previously affirmed in Salzano v. North Jersey Media Group, 993 A.2d 778 (2010) that “The fair-report privilege reflects the judgment that the need, in a self-governing society, for free-flowing information about matters of public interest outweighs concerns over the uncompensated injury to a person's reputation.” This video advances a compelling public interest. The summary of events was based on records that are “open to public view through open access to public records” as defined in the Salzano case. In Ramos v. Flowers, 429 N.J. Super. 13, the Appellate Division of the Superior Court has also affirmed the right to film law enforcement interactions.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 81