Agreed. She is in a Conservative party that needs a name change. Something along the lines of 'Labour-Lite' is far more fitting than Conservative. Looking back over the previous 14 years of Tory 'leadership' can you identify even one real conservative policy? High tax, high immigration, high beaurocracy, high state-life involvement/erosion of individual autonomy (commonly referred to as the nanny state). The list of things that prove the lie in the conservative name is almost endless.
I don't think it is surprising that all of the members that were to the right of the Conservatives are from an immigrant background. The rot of identity politics is highest with white women, which is why Theresa May failed so badly.
@@madMARTYNmarsh1981 she's to the right of thatcher. She literally insulted the police in a newspaper article while she was in charge of them. she incited violence on armistice day.
A few like Suella know it, unfortunately it is dominated by David Cameron "modern" Blair-infused members - anyone who has a lick of sense like her should switch to Reform.
The Conservative Party is their name regardless of whether they are conservative. The Tory Party was the predecessor party, its been nearly two centuries since the actual Tory Party existed; and really the actual Tories only existed for a few decades. The name Tory was originally an insult labeled at a faction of independent MPs (Tory comes from the Irish for Pig Farmer) in the 17th century. This insult became the name for a faction of MPs but it was never a political party in the modern sense. The original Tory faction lost out on the Accession of the House of Hanover. These Tories believed in the hereditary rights of Kings and could not accept the idea that parliament could decide who the King would be (George I of the House of Hanover was selected as heir by parliament, there were over a hundred other individuals with better claims, but they were all catholic). This loss was so significant that the Tory label effectively disappeared and every MP was a Whig. Despite the Whig dominance. The Whigs were also not a party. Whig was again just another insult (Whigamore = Cattle drover). But the faction became so dominant that every MP was notionally a Whig. But these Whigs then had factions and the faction that supported Pitt the Younger eventually embraced the Tory label (more than a decade after Pitt's death) and its this Tory faction that eventually formed the Conservative party in 1834.
@@Codysdab The Tory and Whig parties were both very right wing by today's standards. They were both parties of the rich, the only difference was the type of rich person they supported. Tories were the party of the inherited wealth class and the Whigs were the party of the self made industrialists. To a lesser extent that made the Tories the party of the countryside and the Whigs the Cities. The main difference was between protectionism and free trade. The former benefits the primary economy sector, the latter the secondary (at least when Britain was the only industrialized nation). The modern Conservative party obviously includes both types of wealthy supporters (though not all) but is far more diverse in its support today; and has nothing in common with either party.
@@SpeedfreakUK Please be more specific? Do you mean the economic decline of Great Britain? How the USA now has a 60% higher per capita income than the UK?
The Uniparty has never looked at the electorate with anything but contempt. That didn't really matter when they were effective but neither wings of it are any more.
She'd fit right in. Benefits both sides, everyone wins. Tories lose someone they don't want, Reform gets someone they like, and every other party can stand and laugh at the situation
England, the land of the illegal immigrant boat people (Saxons). England, flag of a Turkish Saracen male 🏴 Big George the Turk 😂❤ Send them illegal Saxons home 😉
is that a reference to H.L. Mencken? “Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.”
The question of Labour vs Conservative is meaningless. Look at who sponsors each party. Look at how open those sponsors were about shifting their allegiance prior to the election. The rich will have the political system they want. The colour of ties worn by the team in charge is of little to no consequence. The finances are even darker in the U.S system. Stay well clear of any element of the U.S political system.
we didnt vo9te for Labour either and the next 5 years are down to the Conservatives who let us down and we will NOT forget it. We want our country back. The replacement stops here, the march of Islam will be stopped, one way or another.
I've never properly thought about the term 'wets' either. Looked it up on Wiki...."In British slang, "wet" meant weak, "inept, ineffectual, effete".[Oxford dictionary] Thatcher coined the usage in 1979-80, with the meaning of feeble, lacking hardness, or willing to compromise with the unions.
Yes to State Nuclear Power through general taxation but Free at the Point of Use is a terrible idea & will lead to the usual rampant abuses, you always need to ask for skin in the game to get the benefits of playing. & bravo to Conor, he really brought his A game.
I wonder if he meant just as compensation for the tax burden of the project? Perhaps not. Im not saying I dont see your point. Either way I respect a guy floating an idea, with otherwise very little expertise, no harm in that.
THE LABOUR PARTY STARTED THE SAME AS REFORM AND TOOK SOMETIME TO BUILD UP SUPPORT, ENOUGH IN TOWNS AND CITIES, FARAGE ONLY GETS SOME FROM ALL THE TOWNS AND CITIES, SAME RULES FOR EVERYONE
I was one of those people who voted Tory in 2019 for the first time. I then at the last election voted for Reform. I’m not going to the right, Labour and the Tories are moving to the left. I just want the country I grew up in. We had immigration when I was a child 60 years ago, but now it’s completely out of control.
Immigration is a symptom, the root cause is your demographic issue. You are not having children. Now this is not unique to the UK. It is occurring across the world from Jamaica to Thailand. This is why there is this pressure to have all this Immigration because despite what people say, they still want their pensions funded, they still want access to cheap labour, they want access to services. But no one wants to has the guts to tell your people that they are the reason why. Instead, your government triple locks pensions (how will the younger, smaller generations pay for it no idea), takes out more debt to pay for the elderly population and leave the bill for the future.
At least we aren't speaking German! Hahaha! We told you what would happen, by you destroying OUR Aryan race, and the void was replaced and filled with more Blacks, Browns, and Muslims! We told you, and warned YOU ALL, about the rise of socialism and communism, especially within the Americas as well, but you DID NOT listen!
RE: Connor talking about Garza s having to to go back home after being imported to uk. They won’t have a home to return to and Israel wouldn’t allow it. I don’t know what we could do with them once we import them.
Where are the English MPs? Why are all the parties stuffed with foreign ethnics and women? Why are they all so lefty/blairite? Enoch was so eloquent and honest
the bigest problem with modern politics is , political partys if you elect a representative they should work on your behalf not at the whim of an unelected private club
Like I'm going to spend 1:22:32 of my time listening to a video, posted by a Yank, who doesn't understand the difference between 'England' and 'The Uniited Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland'! NO! 🤣🤣🤣
When you take the population sizes into account England is the UK for all practical purposes. What's the population of Scotland? 5 million? And Wales, 3 million? I rest my case!
@SMoggyinski did it really, though? Scotland went from the SNP to Labour. Before the SNP, Scotland usually voted Labour. I don't see much difference between Labour and the SNP. But, in all honesty, I don't see much difference between Labour and the Tory party these days.
If you want to know what happened don't ask Braverman or any other member of the Tory party. At the end of a boxing match would there be any point in asking the guy still unconscious on the mat what happened?
We REFORM UK voters are ready to take over in 2029, a poor turnout, and the Liebour party only secured 20% of the should be vote which included those that stayed home with their angry apathy !
given what else government borrowing is spent on, free electricity is bloody brilliant. Only issue will be it will cost more as government is no longer capable of large projects.....but use the Rolls Royce Small Modular Reactors, and its a process that can be rolled out quicker, gain economies of scale, and an industry that other countries would want rather than turning to China. Cheap electricity will have knock in benefits across other industries if the extra supply brings down prices for industry too.
nuclear energy is up to six times more expensive than renewable energy. The EIA estimates that the initial capital cost (overnight cost) of a new reactor is $5,339 per kW, or $5.3 billion for a 1000 MW reactor. Financing cost, long construction periods, and escalating costs can push the total cost well above the overnight cost. we know how there is a construction and they say it will cost this much and than the price in the end will be immensely more, somehow government building jobs turn more expensive in every country. isnt that strange?
Some good points made but no original ideas or thoughts that are likely to bring change. If you are content with fptp, don't expect British politics to change any time soon. Brexit remains irrelevant to the issues Britain faces today.
We dont need to be far right or far left we need to be true centre. The problem is people have confused pure centre with being a compromise between the left and the right as if a. they are diametrically opposed ... they are actually very much not and the more extreme you get the more similar they appear to be and b. the centre isnt just a rejection of the stupidity of aligning yourself with a side in the first place. The centre is just taking the sensible, intelligent, informed, moral, non hyperbolic, approach on all issues. And if that aligns with the right it aligns with the right and if it aligns with the left then it aligns with the left (those positions seem fairly arbitrary these days anyway. The left especially have literally no idea what they believe anymore). Who cares?
Speaks as though he has, mentioned he has. I cant source anything tho so "trust me bro" i guess. Recent timpool streams have more of him on the topic if you want tp judge for youreself
Yes I think he has a series where he goes over some of locke’s works on his website. He recently did a philosophy degree as well and I feel he focused on liberalism
It happened in the UK. We had a UK election not just one in England. Please understand that England cannot be used as a synonym for the UK. The UK has 4 constituent countries: England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
There are no brexit benefits-that’s why a conservative government couldn’t find any ! We will gradually shift back into the eu because of the fragmentation of globalisation , and especially if trump gets in .what wa waste of time, lost opportunities to achieve -nothing .
Watching Rishi and Starmer walk into parliament together, laughing and getting on with each other, should tell you everything you need to know. Cons and Labour are the same, and disagree on very little.
Thatcher used to talk cordially with Michael Foot at the state opening of parliament. It’s called being a grown-up and being able to treat another person with manners and goodwill even if their politics are profoundly different to your own.
OVER A MILLION HAVE GONE OUT AS WELL SO DONT FORGET THAT POINT, ALSO 150000 HAVE DIED FROM CANCER , SAME FROM ACCIDENTS. CARS ETC SO 1.500000 COMING UN IS ONLY REPLACING WHATS GONE OUT AND WE ARE ALL STILL SHORT IF STAFF, WHOS GONNA PAY YOUR STATE PENSION. OK IF YOU CAN AFFORD PRIVATE
@petermizon3344 You clearly have a surface level knowledge of the situation. How exactly are the immigrants paying for the pension when it's now being proven that all migrants from outside the EU and Asia are net drains, they're taking more out than they're paying in.
"I want to know whats happening in britain, i know lets get the least supported most extreme ends of the spectrum. That will give me an accurate report🤦♂️🤦♂️🤣🤣🤣
This is being recorded at NatCon. A conservative convention. So it is getting the point of view from more conservative people. Of course they are not going to be asking Green supporters or Lib Dem reps. Even still I wouldnt describe anything being said here as extreme. So, from a conservative perspective, you could not have asked for a better summary of the goings on in UK politics right now, regardless if you agree or not, those 4 just gave an excellent set of responses.
Conservatives lost for a variety of reasons. But they lost so badly because of Liz Truss and her budget. Most Conservative voters are naturally going to be in favour of tax cuts. But they are also strongly in favour of the economy. Truss' budget hit the economy so bad that even high earners like myself were actually worse off as a result of the tax cut. My Pension pot investments lost 20% in the aftermath, and if I'd not locked in my Mortgage payments, I'd have seen those costs increase by 30%. In addition the £ fell against the $ to record lows causing significant inflation. In comparison the tax cuts were tiny, a few percent off, even for the ultra high earners the losses out-weighed the gains. For high earners such as myself it was a tax cut of a mere £30 a month, when compared to the impact on investments, inflation and potential increases in mortgage payments saw many in my position down tens of thousands on their investments and worse off by hundreds of pounds a month on their income. Practically everyone lost out. Tax cuts can stimulate the economy if done properly. But this cut left everyone poorer, because Truss ignored the economy and sacked the advisors who warned about the negative impacts.
I don't have a problem with major tax cuts, but unless you're selling off state assets and doing serious cost cutting. You can't be making such offers to the electorate. Truss did that, kept all the same spending that was in place and decided to fill the shortfall with government borrowing. It's not wonder what transpired afterwards.
@@Mitjitsu I actually disagree a little bit. You can cut taxes without funding, you just have to take the markets with you. If you can convince the markets that cutting the tax rates will actually stimulate the economy to such an extent that tax receipts will actually rise (and then vitally it does actually slightly work) it can be successful. The Tories spent 10 years successfully increasing tax thresholds without spooking the market, at first this came with spending cuts, but eventually it was just a tax cut. These threshold increases were so regular that when they announced that they were not continuing the practice it was reported as a tax rise. Trusses tax cuts could have worked at a different time; but the fact is the Tories had abandoned the rising of the tax thresholds because the markets were no longer willing to accept an unfunded tax cut as sensible. It was the wrong time to cut taxed. Truss was simply too dogmatic in her approach. She had only a hammer in her toolbox and sacked anyone who advised that a screwdriver was needed instead. Ultimately the Tory party were rightly blamed for allowing Truss to become Prime Minister. The electorate did not vote for radical economic change, the fact that they couped her so quickly is the only reason the party still has any MPs left
The sharp move of Carl Benjamin, Reform, and much of the UK conservative movement to borderline socialism, anti-business, wokeness is worrying. In the UK, immigrants and ethnics academically and economically outperform ethnic English. The UK is having a large backlash and growing resentment and jealousy against successful ethnics and immigrants from across the political spectrum, albeit worse from the woke, left and Labour. 67 out of the UK's 146 billionaires are immigrants. If current trends continue; probably soon the vast majority of UK billionaires, millionaires and elites (angel investors, VCs, private equity, I Bankers, consultants, senior corporate executives, co-founders, technologists, scientists, inventors) are likely to be immigrants, children of immigrants, grandchildren of immigrants and ethnics. Why is this so strongly opposed in the UK? Why is the vast foreign ownership and influence over the UK capital stock a problem? Especially if this ownership and influence is coming from the free democratic world? The UK is in danger of developing an indigent ethnic English underclass subsidized by immigrants and ethnics. Similar to the Bumiputera phenomenon in Malaysia. Because of this, any major reduction in immigration is likely to sharply lower UK per capita income ceteris paribus. Why isn't the UK doing a hail mary of K-12 education reform a la Michaela Community School to dramatically socio-economically and academically raise ethnic English and other lower performing UK students? Where is the massive effort to surge the birth rate? To encourage positive platonic friendships, family relationships, marriage, children? The net effect of the UK's problems could result in the UK having a lower per capita income than Malaysia, Greece, Panama and Portugal. My hope is that the Uk responds by promoting self-actualization, perfection, excellence, freedom. And by sorting immigrants a lot better. A war on crime. Reducing illegal immigration. And by sharply lowering the UK's mass outflow of emigrants and brain drain and millionaire drain to the rest of the world. (The UK has lost a net 8% of millionaires over the past decade. the US has gained 63% net millionaires over the past decade.)
You are seeing something that others are not, AnAn. There is resentment against recent immigrants, true. But that is not because they are successful because they are not and will not ever be as that is not the sort of people they are. The resentment is caused by the sheer volume and the fact that far too many are chancers at best and criminals at worst.
I have no idea where you are getting this idea from that immigrants & ethnics outperform the ethnic english. The backlash is against the fact these people drive down wages, and up prices through increasing the demand and decreasing the supply of the economy. Not to mention the criminal behaviour.
@@SquareNoggin " @SquareNoggin 4 hours ago Because the purpose of politics isn't just to maximize GDP?0" This is true. But this is more true in the USA than the UK. The USA's per capita income is 60% higher than the UK's per capita income and perhaps will soon be twice the UK's per capita income. African Americans have a higher per capita income (albeit more inequality) than the UK--and the outperformance of African Americans versus UK residents is growing over time. Similarly, the UK is poorer than South Korea per capita. And if current trends continue might soon be poorer than Malaysia, Greece, Panama and Portugal too. The UK is in the middle of a continuing socio-economic collapse led by falling academic and socio-economic outcomes by young ethnic English. The UK is losing her ancient culture and civilization to wokeness, mediocrity, and anti-meritocracy culture. This is terrible for the UK and the world. But to turn this around, this needs to be acknowledged. And kids in K-12, GCSE, A levels, need to do a lot better. The UK needs to get her self-confidence and mojo back. In addition to economic revitalization, self-actualization, perfection, excellence, the UK may also in my view consider the following priorities: a) revitalizing and restoring ancient English, Scottish, Welsh, Irish culture and civilization (Stonehenge civilization, Celtic, Durotriges, Regnenses, TrinovantesIceni, Atrebates, Belgae, Iceni, Cantiaci, Catuvellauni Dobunni, Dumnonii, Roman, Angles, Saxons, other Germanic tribes, Norse, Norman, French, Magne Carte and the post Magne Carte civilization and culture) b) resisting the global woke movement in close collaboration with the rest of the world c) resisting the global conservative sunni islamist movement in close collaboration with the rest of the world d) resisting the influence of the communist party of china in close collaboration with the rest of the world Notice that the last three priorities cannot be done by the UK alone. The UK needs to join a global alliance to deal with them. To emphasize, the UK might have the most conservative islamist jihadi adjacent, takfiri adjacent sunni population in the world. Worse than almost all muslim majority countries. Long time immigrants are worse than recent immigrants. 2nd generation worse than 1st generation. 3rd generation worse than 2nd generation. The UK should with humility acknowledge that she has incubated a massive sunni islamist problem at home that she can no longer deal with. And then beg the rest of the world, including the muslim world, to help deradicalize and save UK muslims. Specifically ask MBS (Saudi Arabia), UAE, Egypt, Morocco, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Indian muslims for help. And ban the entire shadow shariah movement and emerging blasphemy laws before it is too late. It is easier for muslims in Saudi Arabia, UAE, Indonesia to criticize islamism than it is for muslims in the UK to do so (because of the threat of anti-defamation and hate speech restrictions on freedom of speech.) This comment is too long. But I could go into each of the five priorities that I think the UK should consider emphasizing. Economic revitalization I think would be the easiest of the five to rally around and implement.
The election firmly rejected the American far right extremist lexicon and narrative. The Tories have excised the Euro-skeptic element and can restore itself now. We have a strong socialist majority in parliament and economic growth about to boom. We are going well
@@gavinbissell884791% of people who had the opportunity to vote for Reform decided not to. England always stands for civilisation. Politeness and kindness and fairness are what we fight and die for
@@seanoconnor8843 but why/how can you or anyone be ok with the reduction of average quality of phenotype due to immigration? I would be glad if someone explained this to me. I am greek btw (and I live in Greece).
Carl Benjamin is literally the LAST person you should be asking ANYTHING to, he's a muppet who knows NOTHING and is a joke - Connor Tomlinson is OK sometimes.
Look, I can agree Carl had a rough phase early on, but he has always been very intelligent and knowledgeable about politics and social topics. His ability to convey his points succinctly and his command of the English language is impeccable. His stance if anything has improved over time. Cry in the corner.
The Conservative Party that Suella Braverman wants to see flourish hardly exists. Arguably she is now in the wrong party.
Agreed. She is in a Conservative party that needs a name change. Something along the lines of 'Labour-Lite' is far more fitting than Conservative. Looking back over the previous 14 years of Tory 'leadership' can you identify even one real conservative policy? High tax, high immigration, high beaurocracy, high state-life involvement/erosion of individual autonomy (commonly referred to as the nanny state). The list of things that prove the lie in the conservative name is almost endless.
I don't think it is surprising that all of the members that were to the right of the Conservatives are from an immigrant background. The rot of identity politics is highest with white women, which is why Theresa May failed so badly.
@@madMARTYNmarsh1981 YOU MEAN REFORM HEAVY, NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HER AND FARAGE, GULLIS 30 P LEE ETC.
@@madMARTYNmarsh1981 she's to the right of thatcher. She literally insulted the police in a newspaper article while she was in charge of them. she incited violence on armistice day.
For the love of God, she'd *better* join Reform.
The Conservative party is dead but doesn't know it!
A few like Suella know it, unfortunately it is dominated by David Cameron "modern" Blair-infused members - anyone who has a lick of sense like her should switch to Reform.
Not only is it dead, it’s been decaying for over a decade
I went to a local tory party meeting, they're acting like what happened didn't actually happen. Me pointing that out was not a popular stance there.
Your tash is bangin!!
Stop referring to the Tories as the Conservative Party.. They have not been conservative for many years.
You refer to it as Britain yet it’s not been British since 1964.
Yes they are far right -not the party of Margaret thatcher -she would never have been stupid enough to leave the EU
The Conservative Party is their name regardless of whether they are conservative. The Tory Party was the predecessor party, its been nearly two centuries since the actual Tory Party existed; and really the actual Tories only existed for a few decades. The name Tory was originally an insult labeled at a faction of independent MPs (Tory comes from the Irish for Pig Farmer) in the 17th century. This insult became the name for a faction of MPs but it was never a political party in the modern sense.
The original Tory faction lost out on the Accession of the House of Hanover. These Tories believed in the hereditary rights of Kings and could not accept the idea that parliament could decide who the King would be (George I of the House of Hanover was selected as heir by parliament, there were over a hundred other individuals with better claims, but they were all catholic). This loss was so significant that the Tory label effectively disappeared and every MP was a Whig.
Despite the Whig dominance. The Whigs were also not a party. Whig was again just another insult (Whigamore = Cattle drover). But the faction became so dominant that every MP was notionally a Whig. But these Whigs then had factions and the faction that supported Pitt the Younger eventually embraced the Tory label (more than a decade after Pitt's death) and its this Tory faction that eventually formed the Conservative party in 1834.
I'd argue they're more like the old Whig party. They're liberal in policy whilst not fully vocally supporting leftism. Maybe they should rebrand?
@@Codysdab The Tory and Whig parties were both very right wing by today's standards. They were both parties of the rich, the only difference was the type of rich person they supported.
Tories were the party of the inherited wealth class and the Whigs were the party of the self made industrialists. To a lesser extent that made the Tories the party of the countryside and the Whigs the Cities. The main difference was between protectionism and free trade. The former benefits the primary economy sector, the latter the secondary (at least when Britain was the only industrialized nation).
The modern Conservative party obviously includes both types of wealthy supporters (though not all) but is far more diverse in its support today; and has nothing in common with either party.
We are beginning to wake up. God, I have been listening to this for 40 years
What are UK people waking up to?
@@AnAn___what 25 years of Blairism has done to our country
@@SpeedfreakUK Please be more specific?
Do you mean the economic decline of Great Britain?
How the USA now has a 60% higher per capita income than the UK?
27th july Trafalgar square London -
@@BARRY-et3jl Please elaborate more on what this means.
Carl out here lookin like he traffics narcotics in 1980s Miami
Beware the false prophet, the false awakening
I've voted Conservative for 50 years.......I voted Reform this time round and will never go back to the left leaning Tories....!
The Uniparty has never looked at the electorate with anything but contempt. That didn't really matter when they were effective but neither wings of it are any more.
Sargon looking like a pimp out there
Wow, what a moment to release a podcast called "What Just Happened In" somewhere other than the USA! 😲
This was pre-recorded! 😃
There is a Suella shaped hole in the Reform party,,,,,,,, please fill it Suella!
She'd fit right in. Benefits both sides, everyone wins. Tories lose someone they don't want, Reform gets someone they like, and every other party can stand and laugh at the situation
@@stephenoxf Fantastic point, I couldn't agree more with you!!
"There is a Suella shaped hole in the Reform party."
Can I join Reform to fill that hole?
No. She's brown.
@@saberhap2639 Your point is ? Colour prejudice ?
Carl looking suave these days.
This is this English flag 🏴
This isn't the English flag 🇬🇧
Nice job goggle. Did not know we had changed the color schem recently. Pirate flag is back in fashion.
England, the land of the illegal immigrant boat people (Saxons).
England, flag of a Turkish Saracen male 🏴
Big George the Turk 😂❤
Send them illegal Saxons home 😉
is that a reference to H.L. Mencken?
“Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.”
Seriously? 😂
The question of Labour vs Conservative is meaningless. Look at who sponsors each party. Look at how open those sponsors were about shifting their allegiance prior to the election. The rich will have the political system they want. The colour of ties worn by the team in charge is of little to no consequence.
The finances are even darker in the U.S system. Stay well clear of any element of the U.S political system.
Thank you for calling our country England
we didnt vo9te for Labour either and the next 5 years are down to the Conservatives who let us down and we will NOT forget it. We want our country back. The replacement stops here, the march of Islam will be stopped, one way or another.
I've never properly thought about the term 'wets' either. Looked it up on Wiki...."In British slang, "wet" meant weak, "inept, ineffectual, effete".[Oxford dictionary] Thatcher coined the usage in 1979-80, with the meaning of feeble, lacking hardness, or willing to compromise with the unions.
Yes to State Nuclear Power through general taxation but Free at the Point of Use is a terrible idea & will lead to the usual rampant abuses, you always need to ask for skin in the game to get the benefits of playing.
& bravo to Conor, he really brought his A game.
I wonder if he meant just as compensation for the tax burden of the project? Perhaps not. Im not saying I dont see your point. Either way I respect a guy floating an idea, with otherwise very little expertise, no harm in that.
THE LABOUR PARTY STARTED THE SAME AS REFORM AND TOOK SOMETIME TO BUILD UP SUPPORT, ENOUGH IN TOWNS AND CITIES, FARAGE ONLY GETS SOME FROM ALL THE TOWNS AND CITIES, SAME RULES FOR EVERYONE
I was one of those people who voted Tory in 2019 for the first time. I then at the last election voted for Reform. I’m not going to the right, Labour and the Tories are moving to the left. I just want the country I grew up in. We had immigration when I was a child 60 years ago, but now it’s completely out of control.
Immigration is a symptom, the root cause is your demographic issue. You are not having children. Now this is not unique to the UK. It is occurring across the world from Jamaica to Thailand.
This is why there is this pressure to have all this Immigration because despite what people say, they still want their pensions funded, they still want access to cheap labour, they want access to services. But no one wants to has the guts to tell your people that they are the reason why. Instead, your government triple locks pensions (how will the younger, smaller generations pay for it no idea), takes out more debt to pay for the elderly population and leave the bill for the future.
PR gave us an Austrian painter, and if we have it, will give us Sharia 20 years early!
At least we aren't speaking German! Hahaha! We told you what would happen, by you destroying OUR Aryan race, and the void was replaced and filled with more Blacks, Browns, and Muslims!
We told you, and warned YOU ALL, about the rise of socialism and communism, especially within the Americas as well, but you DID NOT listen!
Please use the correct flag when talking about England.🏴
They’re not using the wrong flag to talk about England, they’re using the wrong country when talking about the UK. It was a UK election
37:44
ECHR - someone must have signed away her realm! - but just how did it happen? it is a constitutional affront in plain sight!
Great speakers, enjoyed hearing from my favorite Englishmen
and English Women
The only English people in this video were men. There wasn't an English woman.
UK conservatives, opened the borders, forever, FOREVER.😢😮
RE: Connor talking about Garza s having to to go back home after being imported to uk. They won’t have a home to return to and Israel wouldn’t allow it. I don’t know what we could do with them once we import them.
Where are the English MPs? Why are all the parties stuffed with foreign ethnics and women? Why are they all so lefty/blairite? Enoch was so eloquent and honest
the bigest problem with modern politics is , political partys
if you elect a representative they should work on your behalf not at the whim of an unelected private club
Connor says "HAWK TUAH" at 1:20:56
Like I'm going to spend 1:22:32 of my time listening to a video, posted by a Yank, who doesn't understand the difference between 'England' and 'The Uniited Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland'! NO! 🤣🤣🤣
Far too much credit given to Starmer and Labour by the first speaker
Suella's world where "deliberately" = "unfortunately"
a sectarian party complaining about about sectarian parties you can't make this shit up lol
AY UP LOTUS EATERS
Carl channeling his inner John Travolta.
England is not the UK, ffs
England is the only part of the UK where politics ever changes tbh
@@SpeedfreakUK Politics changed dramatically at this election in Scotland too.
When you take the population sizes into account England is the UK for all practical purposes. What's the population of Scotland? 5 million? And Wales, 3 million? I rest my case!
@SMoggyinski did it really, though? Scotland went from the SNP to Labour. Before the SNP, Scotland usually voted Labour. I don't see much difference between Labour and the SNP. But, in all honesty, I don't see much difference between Labour and the Tory party these days.
@@madMARTYNmarsh1981 Labour quietly hate the native scots and the SNP openly hate them, that's about the difference.
When the Saxon began to hate.... Kipling
We live in interesting times!
Really enjoyed that. Cheers
I'm pretty sure that this gentleman would make a half decent engineer.
What happened, happened throughout the UK, not just in England.
SNP down
Suella, if she doesn't booted, will merge Conservative with Reform
no she will just move to Reform. Reform do not want to merge or have anything to do with the Tories.
she will bring more indian immigrants
@@saberhap2639 Evidence please
@@leehotspur9679 she is indian herself. It's like putting a mexican in charge of border security.
I would love Suella Braverman to join Reform.
Gowan Connor, cobra Kai! No mercy! Take the boomer cons down a peg
Carl's suit is interesting...
If you want to know what happened don't ask Braverman or any other member of the Tory party. At the end of a boxing match would there be any point in asking the guy still unconscious on the mat what happened?
51:00 The pain he put me through when an American thinks he knows what's in Wales
Nothing like supplying simplistic answers to complicated questions!
We REFORM UK voters are ready to take over in 2029, a poor turnout, and the Liebour party only secured 20% of the should be vote which included those that stayed home with their angry apathy !
You would have to be right smuck to vote Tory again 3 times they lied to us !! never again .
Crazy my last name is Orr
412 IS A MUCH BIGGER NUMBER THAN 4, THATS HOW IT WORKS, DONT TRY TO CHANGE THE RULES JUST BECAUSE YOU LOST
given what else government borrowing is spent on, free electricity is bloody brilliant. Only issue will be it will cost more as government is no longer capable of large projects.....but use the Rolls Royce Small Modular Reactors, and its a process that can be rolled out quicker, gain economies of scale, and an industry that other countries would want rather than turning to China. Cheap electricity will have knock in benefits across other industries if the extra supply brings down prices for industry too.
How much would it cost to get 100 years ofnuclear fuel stockpiled.? FA in the grand scheme cf net zero, and how strong does that make UK
nuclear energy is up to six times more expensive than renewable energy.
The EIA estimates that the initial capital cost (overnight cost) of a new reactor is $5,339 per kW, or $5.3 billion for a 1000 MW reactor. Financing cost, long construction periods, and escalating costs can push the total cost well above the overnight cost. we know how there is a construction and they say it will cost this much and than the price in the end will be immensely more, somehow government building jobs turn more expensive in every country. isnt that strange?
It's because of all the regulations surrounding it, which is largely driven by the irrational fears of nuclear meltdown.
Get it right UK not just England
Some good points made but no original ideas or thoughts that are likely to bring change. If you are content with fptp, don't expect British politics to change any time soon. Brexit remains irrelevant to the issues Britain faces today.
Suella, for goodness sake, stop saying ER UM AH ER HM ER.
We dont need to be far right or far left we need to be true centre. The problem is people have confused pure centre with being a compromise between the left and the right as if a. they are diametrically opposed ... they are actually very much not and the more extreme you get the more similar they appear to be and b. the centre isnt just a rejection of the stupidity of aligning yourself with a side in the first place.
The centre is just taking the sensible, intelligent, informed, moral, non hyperbolic, approach on all issues. And if that aligns with the right it aligns with the right and if it aligns with the left then it aligns with the left (those positions seem fairly arbitrary these days anyway. The left especially have literally no idea what they believe anymore). Who cares?
Blame wef plants javid and sunak
Has Carl even read Locke?
Speaks as though he has, mentioned he has. I cant source anything tho so "trust me bro" i guess. Recent timpool streams have more of him on the topic if you want tp judge for youreself
Yes I think he has a series where he goes over some of locke’s works on his website. He recently did a philosophy degree as well and I feel he focused on liberalism
@@takilatime
This was joke. He'd always say this during his Sargon of Akkad days when debating!
@@jackarcher9652 holy shit you’ve just unlocked a memory I haven’t thought about for years
It happened in the UK. We had a UK election not just one in England. Please understand that England cannot be used as a synonym for the UK. The UK has 4 constituent countries: England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
Sounds like a lot of cope
5 seat Farage hahaha
There are no brexit benefits-that’s why a conservative government couldn’t find any !
We will gradually shift back into the eu because of the fragmentation of globalisation , and especially if trump gets in .what wa waste of time, lost opportunities to achieve -nothing .
Watching Rishi and Starmer walk into parliament together, laughing and getting on with each other, should tell you everything you need to know. Cons and Labour are the same, and disagree on very little.
Thatcher used to talk cordially with Michael Foot at the state opening of parliament. It’s called being a grown-up and being able to treat another person with manners and goodwill even if their politics are profoundly different to your own.
OVER A MILLION HAVE GONE OUT AS WELL SO DONT FORGET THAT POINT, ALSO 150000 HAVE DIED FROM CANCER , SAME FROM ACCIDENTS. CARS ETC SO 1.500000 COMING UN IS ONLY REPLACING WHATS GONE OUT AND WE ARE ALL STILL SHORT IF STAFF, WHOS GONNA PAY YOUR STATE PENSION. OK IF YOU CAN AFFORD PRIVATE
@petermizon3344 You clearly have a surface level knowledge of the situation. How exactly are the immigrants paying for the pension when it's now being proven that all migrants from outside the EU and Asia are net drains, they're taking more out than they're paying in.
"I want to know whats happening in britain, i know lets get the least supported most extreme ends of the spectrum. That will give me an accurate report🤦♂️🤦♂️🤣🤣🤣
This is being recorded at NatCon. A conservative convention. So it is getting the point of view from more conservative people. Of course they are not going to be asking Green supporters or Lib Dem reps. Even still I wouldnt describe anything being said here as extreme.
So, from a conservative perspective, you could not have asked for a better summary of the goings on in UK politics right now, regardless if you agree or not, those 4 just gave an excellent set of responses.
connor is such a daddy
Gayyyy
@@jimbo8157 yes.
@@oliverwortley3822 lol
*sigh* i need to get off the internet. Im growing real tierd of horny posts.
Conservatives lost for a variety of reasons. But they lost so badly because of Liz Truss and her budget.
Most Conservative voters are naturally going to be in favour of tax cuts. But they are also strongly in favour of the economy. Truss' budget hit the economy so bad that even high earners like myself were actually worse off as a result of the tax cut. My Pension pot investments lost 20% in the aftermath, and if I'd not locked in my Mortgage payments, I'd have seen those costs increase by 30%. In addition the £ fell against the $ to record lows causing significant inflation. In comparison the tax cuts were tiny, a few percent off, even for the ultra high earners the losses out-weighed the gains. For high earners such as myself it was a tax cut of a mere £30 a month, when compared to the impact on investments, inflation and potential increases in mortgage payments saw many in my position down tens of thousands on their investments and worse off by hundreds of pounds a month on their income. Practically everyone lost out.
Tax cuts can stimulate the economy if done properly. But this cut left everyone poorer, because Truss ignored the economy and sacked the advisors who warned about the negative impacts.
I don't have a problem with major tax cuts, but unless you're selling off state assets and doing serious cost cutting. You can't be making such offers to the electorate. Truss did that, kept all the same spending that was in place and decided to fill the shortfall with government borrowing. It's not wonder what transpired afterwards.
@@Mitjitsu I actually disagree a little bit. You can cut taxes without funding, you just have to take the markets with you. If you can convince the markets that cutting the tax rates will actually stimulate the economy to such an extent that tax receipts will actually rise (and then vitally it does actually slightly work) it can be successful.
The Tories spent 10 years successfully increasing tax thresholds without spooking the market, at first this came with spending cuts, but eventually it was just a tax cut. These threshold increases were so regular that when they announced that they were not continuing the practice it was reported as a tax rise.
Trusses tax cuts could have worked at a different time; but the fact is the Tories had abandoned the rising of the tax thresholds because the markets were no longer willing to accept an unfunded tax cut as sensible. It was the wrong time to cut taxed. Truss was simply too dogmatic in her approach. She had only a hammer in her toolbox and sacked anyone who advised that a screwdriver was needed instead.
Ultimately the Tory party were rightly blamed for allowing Truss to become Prime Minister. The electorate did not vote for radical economic change, the fact that they couped her so quickly is the only reason the party still has any MPs left
connor is so hot
Gayyyyy
@@jimbo8157 yes.
@@oliverwortley3822 Tory conference will definitely be your thing then 😅
@@jimbo8157 absolutely not. i like strong, masculine, traditional, proper straight men.
@@oliverwortley3822Are you one yourself?
You're not wrong that conference is full of soyboy type gays.
The sharp move of Carl Benjamin, Reform, and much of the UK conservative movement to borderline socialism, anti-business, wokeness is worrying.
In the UK, immigrants and ethnics academically and economically outperform ethnic English. The UK is having a large backlash and growing resentment and jealousy against successful ethnics and immigrants from across the political spectrum, albeit worse from the woke, left and Labour.
67 out of the UK's 146 billionaires are immigrants. If current trends continue; probably soon the vast majority of UK billionaires, millionaires and elites (angel investors, VCs, private equity, I Bankers, consultants, senior corporate executives, co-founders, technologists, scientists, inventors) are likely to be immigrants, children of immigrants, grandchildren of immigrants and ethnics.
Why is this so strongly opposed in the UK?
Why is the vast foreign ownership and influence over the UK capital stock a problem? Especially if this ownership and influence is coming from the free democratic world?
The UK is in danger of developing an indigent ethnic English underclass subsidized by immigrants and ethnics. Similar to the Bumiputera phenomenon in Malaysia.
Because of this, any major reduction in immigration is likely to sharply lower UK per capita income ceteris paribus.
Why isn't the UK doing a hail mary of K-12 education reform a la Michaela Community School to dramatically socio-economically and academically raise ethnic English and other lower performing UK students?
Where is the massive effort to surge the birth rate? To encourage positive platonic friendships, family relationships, marriage, children?
The net effect of the UK's problems could result in the UK having a lower per capita income than Malaysia, Greece, Panama and Portugal. My hope is that the Uk responds by promoting self-actualization, perfection, excellence, freedom.
And by sorting immigrants a lot better. A war on crime. Reducing illegal immigration. And by sharply lowering the UK's mass outflow of emigrants and brain drain and millionaire drain to the rest of the world. (The UK has lost a net 8% of millionaires over the past decade. the US has gained 63% net millionaires over the past decade.)
Because the purpose of politics isn't just to maximize GDP?
You are seeing something that others are not, AnAn. There is resentment against recent immigrants, true. But that is not because they are successful because they are not and will not ever be as that is not the sort of people they are. The resentment is caused by the sheer volume and the fact that far too many are chancers at best and criminals at worst.
You're off your trolley, mate: Yanks haven't got a fucking clue about socialism
I have no idea where you are getting this idea from that immigrants & ethnics outperform the ethnic english. The backlash is against the fact these people drive down wages, and up prices through increasing the demand and decreasing the supply of the economy. Not to mention the criminal behaviour.
@@SquareNoggin
"
@SquareNoggin
4 hours ago
Because the purpose of politics isn't just to maximize GDP?0"
This is true. But this is more true in the USA than the UK. The USA's per capita income is 60% higher than the UK's per capita income and perhaps will soon be twice the UK's per capita income. African Americans have a higher per capita income (albeit more inequality) than the UK--and the outperformance of African Americans versus UK residents is growing over time. Similarly, the UK is poorer than South Korea per capita. And if current trends continue might soon be poorer than Malaysia, Greece, Panama and Portugal too.
The UK is in the middle of a continuing socio-economic collapse led by falling academic and socio-economic outcomes by young ethnic English.
The UK is losing her ancient culture and civilization to wokeness, mediocrity, and anti-meritocracy culture. This is terrible for the UK and the world. But to turn this around, this needs to be acknowledged. And kids in K-12, GCSE, A levels, need to do a lot better.
The UK needs to get her self-confidence and mojo back.
In addition to economic revitalization, self-actualization, perfection, excellence, the UK may also in my view consider the following priorities:
a) revitalizing and restoring ancient English, Scottish, Welsh, Irish culture and civilization (Stonehenge civilization, Celtic, Durotriges, Regnenses, TrinovantesIceni, Atrebates, Belgae, Iceni, Cantiaci, Catuvellauni Dobunni, Dumnonii, Roman, Angles, Saxons, other Germanic tribes, Norse, Norman, French, Magne Carte and the post Magne Carte civilization and culture)
b) resisting the global woke movement in close collaboration with the rest of the world
c) resisting the global conservative sunni islamist movement in close collaboration with the rest of the world
d) resisting the influence of the communist party of china in close collaboration with the rest of the world
Notice that the last three priorities cannot be done by the UK alone. The UK needs to join a global alliance to deal with them.
To emphasize, the UK might have the most conservative islamist jihadi adjacent, takfiri adjacent sunni population in the world. Worse than almost all muslim majority countries. Long time immigrants are worse than recent immigrants. 2nd generation worse than 1st generation. 3rd generation worse than 2nd generation. The UK should with humility acknowledge that she has incubated a massive sunni islamist problem at home that she can no longer deal with. And then beg the rest of the world, including the muslim world, to help deradicalize and save UK muslims. Specifically ask MBS (Saudi Arabia), UAE, Egypt, Morocco, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Indian muslims for help. And ban the entire shadow shariah movement and emerging blasphemy laws before it is too late. It is easier for muslims in Saudi Arabia, UAE, Indonesia to criticize islamism than it is for muslims in the UK to do so (because of the threat of anti-defamation and hate speech restrictions on freedom of speech.)
This comment is too long. But I could go into each of the five priorities that I think the UK should consider emphasizing.
Economic revitalization I think would be the easiest of the five to rally around and implement.
The election firmly rejected the American far right extremist lexicon and narrative. The Tories have excised the Euro-skeptic element and can restore itself now.
We have a strong socialist majority in parliament and economic growth about to boom. We are going well
The uk voting trend leaned more to the right you're dead wrong
@@gavinbissell884791% of people who had the opportunity to vote for Reform decided not to. England always stands for civilisation. Politeness and kindness and fairness are what we fight and die for
@@seanoconnor8843 but why/how can you or anyone be ok with the reduction of average quality of phenotype due to immigration? I would be glad if someone explained this to me.
I am greek btw (and I live in Greece).
Labour is about to crash the UK economy.
I am optimistic that the Tories will come back strong.
@@seanoconnor8843 Labour got the same votes with Starmer as it did with Corbyn.
rubbish
What is rubbish?
@@AnAn___ he won't give a straight answer, they just spout word salad and cry like the Trump protester
@@AnAn___ his comment.
badum ts
Carl Benjamin is literally the LAST person you should be asking ANYTHING to, he's a muppet who knows NOTHING and is a joke - Connor Tomlinson is OK sometimes.
nonsense
Bruh Carl is a genius
A bit harsh don't you think? What is it about him that you object to so strongly?
Look, I can agree Carl had a rough phase early on, but he has always been very intelligent and knowledgeable about politics and social topics. His ability to convey his points succinctly and his command of the English language is impeccable. His stance if anything has improved over time. Cry in the corner.
Prob has a crush and got rejected @@stumccabe