Kipping’s Cool worlds channel has content that is literally unmatched by any other creator on UA-cam for the material. There are three or 4 videos that are simply masterpieces that cannot be challenged
@Jon Jingles “alright alright alright” 😂 much love to you all this is hilarity lol. “When you think worm holes…you think Lincoln. Buy Lincoln, be a lot cooler if you did.” -MaThEw DaMoN McCoNaLiNcOlN
I wonder sometimes if humanity's only realistic solution for reaching beyond the solar system is very large and relatively slow self contained colonies. Should the goal even be to reach another planet? Or should we just become nomads who set out with no destination in mind, drifting from star to star, scooping up asteroid belts for materials to sustain ourselves and build more artificial habitats. Occasionally letting the people who want to get off and settle the rare habitable world we might come across, knowing that they will forever be left behind and isolated from the rest of humanity, which is itself ever more fragmented as it slowly drifts apart.
Space is massive, the thing is most of space is empty, the distance between stars is huge, hitting space dust or micrometeoroids would be an issue, but if you developed the engines and the ship, it is hoped they would have some type of plating or shields to offer protection.
Space is so vast that most of it is empty. It would be a very low odd of hitting anything in space. Another thing is if we are advanced enough to travel that fast and explore other planets in other galaxy, i'm sure we would have technology that could somehow possible detect various obstacles along the way from very very very far away and adjust course or we could have weapons strong enough to completely obliterate the obstacles or maybe we could have some shielding to protect it from radiation and various impacts.
I like how we can talk about black holes and worm holes like we know how they work when all we have is theories and flawed science where we are using mathematics and quantum physics to explain something that general relativity explains yet some people won't accept more obvious assumptions that make alot more common sense like life on other planets,but will consider the miltiverse,simulation and interstellar travel through impossible black holes. Black holes .. a collapsed star so dense that it pulls things towards it crushing them down,the size of the black hole radius is equal to the size of the star,the black hole will eventually turn outward on itself when it's core mass exceeds the size of its radius,in this process of eating matter,it disperses matter in the form of gasses which go on to create new resources for clouds which form planets and stars,black holes create a lensing effect which males measuring their mass density difficult especially when looking through a telescope millions of light years away,I very highly doubt a black hole is infinitely dense and i do not tale on board guesses that a black hole acts like a worm hole where there is another side to escape from,I don't think black holes punch a hole in space time and there is ZERO proof of this We live in a universe where golden ratios and symmetry are the constant throughout our known universe,emerging life will be different but similar enough,and advanced life like our own will be more like us and will have the ability to develop just like us If you look at the very small and the very large you find the same,if you look around the known universe you find uniformity with the same elements,that golden ratio is everywhere,yet there is no life anywhere,we are in our own and they know for sure that black holes go into infinity ? No they do NOT know this unless they go inside one,come back and tell us And that is their argument as to why Einstein can't be right when it comes to the very small,also they bring up the double slit and wave function yet I really don't see any issue with a particle or photon being/acting like both a wave and a particle,photons do act like waves,and particles will be carried along in waves .. where that breaks down is where they claim that when you try to measure the experiment yet there is no solid proof of this anywhere that I have found,only hypothesis so you need to take their word for it and yet also if true,it doesn't mean freaky action or weird science,it's simply a lack of understanding what measuring is actually doing Only a few years back,they claimed time travel to the future is possible which I agree with but time travel to the past is totally impossible which I do not agree with but now you can catch them say it could well be possible ... I worked this out my self within a year of thought yet those people are academics with many years under the belt,I do not even claim to be smart but what's going on ? Same goes for black holes,there is nothing wrong with theories of how they exist or their function but no one can put claim to them being or doing anything until they can study them up close,I think black holes are cosmic recycling machines personally and I highly doubt they can be used for travel I claim bullshit on all this,science has become stagnant over the last 60 years and now clutching at straws to create excitement,interest and funding by peddling rubbish
That's cuz it's Theoretical physics. All theories. Sure we need theories so that we can test them and prove them wrong or right, but sometimes there are so many out there, or are theories that are impossible to test with our current technology, where it muddies the waters.
Isn't alpha centari closer than the black hole that would be a futile journey I love to gaze at the universe but I got a few questions about it that doesn't make sense and I'd love it explained to me cause I think their wrong
I mean he also did say this method was more for a civilization already with systems over the galaxy. but using them as energy sources in-between places
Seeing that black holes can be mirrors like describe, could we find a black hole that's in line with Earth to give us a line-of-sight effective enough and get the timing down perfect relative to the distance of it to be able to see images that look you know sort of like distant space telescopic images or whatever but of Earth itself from the past?
@Radarink it has nothing to do with seeing through black holes, rube. Did you not watch the video? He very clearly said black holes can bend light in a complete 180 degrees and act as a mirror
You should check out the concept of a gravitational lens. It doesn't need to be black holes, objects with a lot of mass will bent light and therefore can act as a magnifying glass. This is already used in astronomy.
@@halbmalte it's like you know don't even paying attention! You're pissing me off! I know what gravitational lensing is, heezus effing kryst!!! This is the first time I ever heard it confirmed that the light to be lens in a complete 180 degrees. That's the whole point of the question! There needs to be a peripheral through this phone and smack you all around get you in line! I want to know if I can view Earth in the past with gravitational lensing if it's lined up and relative to the like if we can discover that perfect alignment. Freakin hell.... do not try to be helpful if you're not! It is way too cold here and I am way too grumpy about it. Keep putting up with it
Considering the nearest black hole is 15000 light years away and alfa cantori is only 4.5 light years away. I'd say traveling to the black hole to get to Alfa cantori is counterintuitive!
@@tonyg5132 Gaia BH1 (~1600 light years away). I agree that the problem isn't with the physics in principle, rather that the time needed between your laser reaching the event horizon and returning with the excess energy is prohibitive for our civilization today. That said, the fraction of the night sky that we've mapped within our local group today is really, REALLY small. Not to mention that it could easily be argued that given historical rates of technology innovation in other areas, our detection methods are probably also still in their infancy. So who knows how close the ACTUAL nearest black holes are (let alone binary stars). Better to keep our minds open for now, and to stay curious.
He said this was for a theoretically advanced society looking for a cheap “highway” system between stars. The entire concept is “stealing” energy. Not being able to generate the energy.
When speaking of Black Holes "Some even as close as 10-20 light years away". Isnt Alpha Centauri only 4-5 light years away? Sure, that would be great science but it would be a terrible way to get to Alpha Centauri. It's like when you live in LA and get a shipment from Texas, yet the box had to go all the way to Minnesota to get to you.
so we would need to go relativistic speeds in order to get close enough to black holes so we can use the black holes to go relativistic speeds? so we're not using this to get to alpha centari.
I have an oppinion, so use only if something resonates. To visualise how 3d environment can be a projection one may try meditation upon how Platonic solids can be built in the Metatron's cube. I feel holographic principal resonates with the Sacred geometry. For exaple, maybe inflation phase of the big bang is a way the creation unfolded from point like zero dimensions to one dimension. Than there's a possibility to build shapes, like sphere - surface from the infinite amount of points. Perfect radius. Whatever that might be for infinity. And then infinite amount of those spheres. Same perfect distance apart. And all sorts of shapes and patterns, degrees of freedom, frames of reference, every opposite. Space/time from one side of the event horizon and time/space from the other. Acceleration of mass produces the event horizon. So each our movement, each breath even if you think (emotion and thoughts also moves charge) is engraved on the event horizon on the edge of observable universe. With the limitless current of time/space from the other side. Flowing from One to One. Massless or point of infinite mass
The neutrino slingshot idea is good but what happens when you collide with another object in space on your way to your destination. Maneuvering at those speeds it would be almost impossible and would slow you down. I think the only way to do it would be extremely slowly where you have a system of robotic sensors set up from point A to point B to tell the AI computer running the ship how to maneuver and when and where to go to miss objects on the trajectory path.
If you travel the speed of light how does that not split atoms and cause a nuclear explosion, are you not bound to crash into anything at that speed [big or small] and get destroyed?
They collide particles at places like CERN at speeds of 99.999% the speed of light. No nuclear explosions. Actually in our atmosphere there are particles from the sun, atomic-sized alpha particles traveling around 7% the speed of light, hitting molecules that make up that atmosphere millions of times a second, sometimes. No nuclear explosions. So no, not a concern by the ppl in the know. Shields provide adequate protection in most interstellar travel models. Interesting question.
You know those Hot Wheels tracks with the little booster that's 2 wheels spinning really fast? Let's do that, but with binary stars! -This guy: Na, black holes..
I believe scientists have been successful in creating antimatter in the lab...but only for nano seconds and in miniscule quantity. Problem is how do you contain antimatter until it is ready for use? As soon as antimatter comes in contact (even electromagnetically) with regular matter the result is anahilation! I suspect that right now the amount of energy needed to create a few particles of antimatter for nanoseconds is way too high...not feasible.
i really thought of what he said when at the begining of the clip... is there any possible we can steal any kinetic energy from the cosmic and just make it done ... apart from what he said , any possibilities....??
His only problem with the laser is that y0u would need a ridiculous amount of energy to power a laser powerful enough to move a spacecraft. The problem with space travel is that y0u need an endless supply of energy
It’s crazy how even if we could travel at the speed of light the nearest galaxy is out of range, unless you could travel at the speed of light for a couple million years and somehow have your offspring get there
If you could travel near the speed the light, then you would easily make it there yourself in your lifetime as time slows down for you. 2 million years would have passed to the outside world but for you it could only be like a year
@@elefantkakithe closest galaxy to us is 25,000 light years away.... so no, you definitely wouldn't make it there yourself, even if traveling at the speed of light
IF the universe is expanding at the speed of light or faster due to dark energy, once your spaceship left the Milky Way galaxy you would be doomed, lost in inter-galactic space with no chance of ever getting anywhere.
I think the key is understanding the technology of past human civilizations. If we did we could skip the time needed to naturally get to those technological points. For example, if people 3,000 years ago had the technology of today. If we could figure out the technology of the people that created the pyramids 11,000 years ago we maybe could get there
As of what we know today...similar to how it is done today: when sending probes (let's say mars, saturn, etc) we use gravity to slingshot and accelerate; then we again use gravity (anti-slingshot/gravity well) to decelerate...or we simply go into orbit...first we steal energy then we donate energy.
I think the universe DID intend for us to use the loopholes! We just have to figure them out with the technology we have instead of fight with each other!
Okok all these theory about things travelling super fast. But that’s for a particle. How will a whole human being or multi-atomic object go through it?
I'm struggling to see how the frequency of an electromagnetic wave would increase when you slingshot it around a black hole. The net frequency would remain the same without increasing the frequency of the input wave. Surely the only property of the wave that can be manipulated is the amplitude? If an EM wave is merely a projection of the changing state of electrons traveling through space at the rate at which time propagates, you cannot increase the net frequency of a wave without increasing the rate of the flipping electrons at the input. 🤷
@@iCanSeeWhatMostCant yes, due to the expansion of the universe. However, this is only true because we are also in the same expanding universe. When the laser light leaves the vicinity of the black hole, it would go back to normal, making the net frequency the same as when it entered the vicinity of the black hole.
Well technically a black whole it’s self could bring you to alternate Dimension but it’s would be similar to it also destroying light particles and then placing those particles in that dimension. What he talking about is using the gravity to go the speed of light which also the gravitational force of the black whole itself
@@iCanSeeWhatMostCant yes it would, but only while it is local to the black hole, once it is no longer local and it returns to normal space the frequency would return to the previous state to the observer. Like squeezing the middle of a hose pipe, you get an increased flow around the compressed area but in front of it would be the same as before the compression.
Book of Thoth states to not travel the cosmos in angles or lines lest the hounds at the gates get you immediately. Maybe that means our bodies like you say cannot handle speed of light travel maybe the hounds represent what happens to our bodies at that speed like tearing apart maybe. So Thoth states to evade this travel in curves and circles. Such as the way the planets move, so in essence could we not sling shot planet to planet and as the gears of the universe are in motion like clockwork as a galaxy nears ours and we are already positioned in travel on a certain planet of ours maybe Pluto, so we’d hopscotch planet to planet in each gravity field so when we near Pluto and the next galaxies we sling shot to them. So we are basically moving in spheres and in curves which could also mean to travel planet to planet not skipping over them for speed. Maybe that is the only viable way it will take longer but maybe safer. So not necessarily colonizing but travel points would be set up at these planets by tech and AI, and our broadcasting to them to control them like ground control and eventually it’s be like Star Wars ish lol. That’s the extent of my brain in this arena. ❤ DMT is the road map left to us to get to the stars. It’s use allows us to ask how to safely navigate the cosmos, and our ancient ancestors had this knowledge in some capacity. Let’s not forget it. DMT gets our minds to the cosmos and helps us learn how to get our solid bodies to follow the trail. ❤
the problem is you reach a point of no return. there's no turning back. no repair or docking stations. no refueling or reloading supplies. total hostile environment. let's go!
Well He may sound crazy and delusional about that Neutrino sling short idea, But that's how Concepts are Born, you got to see it first before your realise in Reality, Human beings are powerful and unlimited
Kipping’s Cool worlds channel has content that is literally unmatched by any other creator on UA-cam for the material. There are three or 4 videos that are simply masterpieces that cannot be challenged
I mean SEA is up there with the quality buddy
I cannot agree with you more bro
Cool worlds and Sea are the best in the business
This little maneuver is going to cost us 51 years
you don’t sound bad for pushing 120
@Jon Jingles “alright alright alright” 😂 much love to you all this is hilarity lol.
“When you think worm holes…you think Lincoln. Buy Lincoln, be a lot cooler if you did.”
-MaThEw DaMoN McCoNaLiNcOlN
Id do it
Come on TARS!
It's necessary
I wonder sometimes if humanity's only realistic solution for reaching beyond the solar system is very large and relatively slow self contained colonies. Should the goal even be to reach another planet? Or should we just become nomads who set out with no destination in mind, drifting from star to star, scooping up asteroid belts for materials to sustain ourselves and build more artificial habitats. Occasionally letting the people who want to get off and settle the rare habitable world we might come across, knowing that they will forever be left behind and isolated from the rest of humanity, which is itself ever more fragmented as it slowly drifts apart.
That’s in essence the core of Isaac Arthur’s series about the million year ark, check it out it’s really cool
Maybe that's how we got here
Read Carlos Castaneda, we can already travel to another worlds.
What if the Earth is the very large, relatively slow self-contained colony... 🤔
Than the race that stays come back as ape like God's with untapped powers while fighting that alien civ 134 colony c.
small black holes are very common, this series of interviews is a great example...i cant seem to pull away
3 hits of blotter LSD will get you there for $15. No spacecraft required
😂
Kipping is great. Thanks lex.
He just explained the space travel plot of Lightyear.
This❤
The thing is how do you control a vehicle going that fast in space. Won’t your ship hit comets and asteroids
Don't take any of this too seriously. Interesting thought experiments for folks that don't really do anything.
Space is massive, the thing is most of space is empty, the distance between stars is huge, hitting space dust or micrometeoroids would be an issue, but if you developed the engines and the ship, it is hoped they would have some type of plating or shields to offer protection.
Space is so vast that most of it is empty. It would be a very low odd of hitting anything in space. Another thing is if we are advanced enough to travel that fast and explore other planets in other galaxy, i'm sure we would have technology that could somehow possible detect various obstacles along the way from very very very far away and adjust course or we could have weapons strong enough to completely obliterate the obstacles or maybe we could have some shielding to protect it from radiation and various impacts.
Some type of force field around the craft 🤔
You gotta get Issac Arthur on here
The idea of flying a ship in a middle of 2 spining neutron stars funny
I like how we can talk about black holes and worm holes like we know how they work when all we have is theories and flawed science where we are using mathematics and quantum physics to explain something that general relativity explains yet some people won't accept more obvious assumptions that make alot more common sense like life on other planets,but will consider the miltiverse,simulation and interstellar travel through impossible black holes.
Black holes .. a collapsed star so dense that it pulls things towards it crushing them down,the size of the black hole radius is equal to the size of the star,the black hole will eventually turn outward on itself when it's core mass exceeds the size of its radius,in this process of eating matter,it disperses matter in the form of gasses which go on to create new resources for clouds which form planets and stars,black holes create a lensing effect which males measuring their mass density difficult especially when looking through a telescope millions of light years away,I very highly doubt a black hole is infinitely dense and i do not tale on board guesses that a black hole acts like a worm hole where there is another side to escape from,I don't think black holes punch a hole in space time and there is ZERO proof of this
We live in a universe where golden ratios and symmetry are the constant throughout our known universe,emerging life will be different but similar enough,and advanced life like our own will be more like us and will have the ability to develop just like us
If you look at the very small and the very large you find the same,if you look around the known universe you find uniformity with the same elements,that golden ratio is everywhere,yet there is no life anywhere,we are in our own and they know for sure that black holes go into infinity ? No they do NOT know this unless they go inside one,come back and tell us
And that is their argument as to why Einstein can't be right when it comes to the very small,also they bring up the double slit and wave function yet I really don't see any issue with a particle or photon being/acting like both a wave and a particle,photons do act like waves,and particles will be carried along in waves .. where that breaks down is where they claim that when you try to measure the experiment yet there is no solid proof of this anywhere that I have found,only hypothesis so you need to take their word for it and yet also if true,it doesn't mean freaky action or weird science,it's simply a lack of understanding what measuring is actually doing
Only a few years back,they claimed time travel to the future is possible which I agree with but time travel to the past is totally impossible which I do not agree with but now you can catch them say it could well be possible ... I worked this out my self within a year of thought yet those people are academics with many years under the belt,I do not even claim to be smart but what's going on ? Same goes for black holes,there is nothing wrong with theories of how they exist or their function but no one can put claim to them being or doing anything until they can study them up close,I think black holes are cosmic recycling machines personally and I highly doubt they can be used for travel
I claim bullshit on all this,science has become stagnant over the last 60 years and now clutching at straws to create excitement,interest and funding by peddling rubbish
That's cuz it's Theoretical physics. All theories. Sure we need theories so that we can test them and prove them wrong or right, but sometimes there are so many out there, or are theories that are impossible to test with our current technology, where it muddies the waters.
Mixing since with fractions is really talking about warm hols as traveling 🧭 in time
Isn't alpha centari closer than the black hole that would be a futile journey I love to gaze at the universe but I got a few questions about it that doesn't make sense and I'd love it explained to me cause I think their wrong
I mean he also did say this method was more for a civilization already with systems over the galaxy. but using them as energy sources in-between places
It's the title that's off. Don't think he was still talking about alpha centari when talking about his idea.
Can't they be created
thats a crazy concept damn
Wow what he's saying and how he's saying it is so interesting! I could listen to him for hours
His UA-cam channel called "cool world's" is properly decent stuff check him out
How would one (spaceship) stop after accelerating to fractions of light speed? Reverse slingshot effect?
Basically...steal energy at the beggining, then donate energy at the end.
Seeing that black holes can be mirrors like describe, could we find a black hole that's in line with Earth to give us a line-of-sight effective enough and get the timing down perfect relative to the distance of it to be able to see images that look you know sort of like distant space telescopic images or whatever but of Earth itself from the past?
@Radarink it has nothing to do with seeing through black holes, rube. Did you not watch the video? He very clearly said black holes can bend light in a complete 180 degrees and act as a mirror
@@i.am.not.herbert Yes and we have now observed light from BEHIND a black hole. Tip of the iceberg.
You should check out the concept of a gravitational lens. It doesn't need to be black holes, objects with a lot of mass will bent light and therefore can act as a magnifying glass. This is already used in astronomy.
@@halbmalte He is talking about 180degree though...black hole is required.
@@halbmalte it's like you know don't even paying attention! You're pissing me off! I know what gravitational lensing is, heezus effing kryst!!!
This is the first time I ever heard it confirmed that the light to be lens in a complete 180 degrees. That's the whole point of the question! There needs to be a peripheral through this phone and smack you all around get you in line! I want to know if I can view Earth in the past with gravitational lensing if it's lined up and relative to the like if we can discover that perfect alignment.
Freakin hell.... do not try to be helpful if you're not! It is way too cold here and I am way too grumpy about it. Keep putting up with it
Considering the nearest black hole is 15000 light years away and alfa cantori is only 4.5 light years away. I'd say traveling to the black hole to get to Alfa cantori is counterintuitive!
Watch "Event horizon" movie
If you have the technology to send a craft to one of these black hole locations then you wouldn't need it.
What’s the closest black hole near earth?
@@tonyg5132 Gaia BH1 (~1600 light years away). I agree that the problem isn't with the physics in principle, rather that the time needed between your laser reaching the event horizon and returning with the excess energy is prohibitive for our civilization today. That said, the fraction of the night sky that we've mapped within our local group today is really, REALLY small. Not to mention that it could easily be argued that given historical rates of technology innovation in other areas, our detection methods are probably also still in their infancy. So who knows how close the ACTUAL nearest black holes are (let alone binary stars).
Better to keep our minds open for now, and to stay curious.
Nice, someone said it.
He said this was for a theoretically advanced society looking for a cheap “highway” system between stars.
The entire concept is “stealing” energy. Not being able to generate the energy.
The issue with the slingshot theory is how would you stop? Also how do you build something able to withstand that speed.
When speaking of Black Holes "Some even as close as 10-20 light years away". Isnt Alpha Centauri only 4-5 light years away? Sure, that would be great science but it would be a terrible way to get to Alpha Centauri.
It's like when you live in LA and get a shipment from Texas, yet the box had to go all the way to Minnesota to get to you.
so we would need to go relativistic speeds in order to get close enough to black holes so we can use the black holes to go relativistic speeds? so we're not using this to get to alpha centari.
The cool worlds guy, love this podcast
Maybe black holes are like a giant microscope lenses that we are being observed through or tunnels to another black hole.
I have an oppinion, so use only if something resonates. To visualise how 3d environment can be a projection one may try meditation upon how Platonic solids can be built in the Metatron's cube. I feel holographic principal resonates with the Sacred geometry. For exaple, maybe inflation phase of the big bang is a way the creation unfolded from point like zero dimensions to one dimension. Than there's a possibility to build shapes, like sphere - surface from the infinite amount of points. Perfect radius. Whatever that might be for infinity. And then infinite amount of those spheres. Same perfect distance apart. And all sorts of shapes and patterns, degrees of freedom, frames of reference, every opposite.
Space/time from one side of the event horizon and time/space from the other.
Acceleration of mass produces the event horizon. So each our movement, each breath even if you think (emotion and thoughts also moves charge) is engraved on the event horizon on the edge of observable universe. With the limitless current of time/space from the other side. Flowing from One to One. Massless or point of infinite mass
I'd put my money on it that no one is travelling through any black holes lol
Whats with the suit and tie?
Send back an image through a blackhole? That was a wormhole in Interstellar not a blackhole, information can not leave a black hole.
These hypotheticals is wild lol
You meet Iron Man George Clooney with this method
instead of using lasers, how about using the plasma from the accretion disc for propulsion?
It's fascinating to me that scientists put so much truth And absolute In pure speculation
Wow! Puri-Puri Prisoner is way smarter than I thought!
with the arcteezy
no chance we cannot even build a pyramid
We could but why? Who's paying for it?
Momentum synchronisity
Suppose we reach these immense speeds. How do we then slow down once we reach our destination?
The Jupiter 2 didn't need a "black hole" to get there!
Wait til they get halfway and find out gravity is pulling from more than one direction... then what?
That video is absolutely mind blowing
We need to figure out how to meet at the same place at the end of time so we can throw a rager.
Makes no sense going to Alpha Centauri since any black hole is farther than the star.
To be honest it would be easier just to travel there at snail's pace then to dive into a blackhole and hope you make it out in one piece.
The neutrino slingshot idea is good but what happens when you collide with another object in space on your way to your destination. Maneuvering at those speeds it would be almost impossible and would slow you down. I think the only way to do it would be extremely slowly where you have a system of robotic sensors set up from point A to point B to tell the AI computer running the ship how to maneuver and when and where to go to miss objects on the trajectory path.
You move so fast that length contraction will shrink anything in you’re path to the size of a neutron
If you travel the speed of light how does that not split atoms and cause a nuclear explosion, are you not bound to crash into anything at that speed [big or small] and get destroyed?
They collide particles at places like CERN at speeds of 99.999% the speed of light. No nuclear explosions. Actually in our atmosphere there are particles from the sun, atomic-sized alpha particles traveling around 7% the speed of light, hitting molecules that make up that atmosphere millions of times a second, sometimes. No nuclear explosions. So no, not a concern by the ppl in the know. Shields provide adequate protection in most interstellar travel models. Interesting question.
If you can’t safely travel to Pluto, land safely & return home then thinking about traveling Alpha is ridiculous .
Old idea that was used in a novel I read that was written back in the 70s I believe.
We are misinterpreting SUN. Sun itself is kind of Black hole and if we go inside sun we are going to travel interstellar....
So in order to travel to a star all we have to do is travel to a pair of black holes 😂
Love David Kipling
We just gotta find the relays.
You know those Hot Wheels tracks with the little booster that's 2 wheels spinning really fast? Let's do that, but with binary stars!
-This guy: Na, black holes..
We need new Sub Light Speed drives and Warp Drives
Both could be based on synthetic negative mass
Bruh opening a black hole would suck in the solar system
Wow, so is there really synthetic anti-matter? 🤯 if not, is this the key?🤯🤯
I believe scientists have been successful in creating antimatter in the lab...but only for nano seconds and in miniscule quantity. Problem is how do you contain antimatter until it is ready for use? As soon as antimatter comes in contact (even electromagnetically) with regular matter the result is anahilation! I suspect that right now the amount of energy needed to create a few particles of antimatter for nanoseconds is way too high...not feasible.
This is kipplings channel
youtube.com/@CoolWorldsLab
Science fiction writers have a lot to answer for; now we have a plethora of scientists queuing up to push their fiction as science facts.
It’s just an itty-bitty black hole… what can go wrong…
this guy looks like the famous time traveler picture, just give him the sunglasses and hes good to go ;D
The solution to faster than light travel is magnets
Massive magnets
My tiny brain cannot comprehend how these geniuses come up with this technology and even more importantly, how they use them in action.
i really thought of what he said when at the begining of the clip... is there any possible we can steal any kinetic energy from the cosmic and just make it done ... apart from what he said , any possibilities....??
This is probably what black holes are, portals
His only problem with the laser is that y0u would need a ridiculous amount of energy to power a laser powerful enough to move a spacecraft. The problem with space travel is that y0u need an endless supply of energy
zero point energy
@@poindextertunes u would have more chance of building a time machine
Quantum entanglement is the secret to interstellar travel.
I've had a similar thought...but rather with Quantum Tunneling!
It’s crazy how even if we could travel at the speed of light the nearest galaxy is out of range, unless you could travel at the speed of light for a couple million years and somehow have your offspring get there
If you could travel near the speed the light, then you would easily make it there yourself in your lifetime as time slows down for you. 2 million years would have passed to the outside world but for you it could only be like a year
@@elefantkakithe closest galaxy to us is 25,000 light years away.... so no, you definitely wouldn't make it there yourself, even if traveling at the speed of light
@@Crowcaww yes you would, time would slow down for you. From your perspective you would get there almost instantly
@@elefantkaki no you wouldn’t. After reading one book you’d be like Damn this is gonna take forever
@@billjones8950 why
What a genius - magnificent. We need more of this. We’re going to have to get off of this rock eventually.
Not in your lifetime. We have no where to go.
IF the universe is expanding at the speed of light or faster due to dark energy, once your spaceship left the Milky Way galaxy you would be doomed, lost in inter-galactic space with no chance of ever getting anywhere.
Love this video
We need instant teleportation
what would they even do when they got there? play Icarus and start building from scratch?
Cheers mate 😎 👌
We need to figure out general artificial intelligence. Once we do it will probably solve these problems in ways we may never think of.
I think the key is understanding the technology of past human civilizations. If we did we could skip the time needed to naturally get to those technological points. For example, if people 3,000 years ago had the technology of today. If we could figure out the technology of the people that created the pyramids 11,000 years ago we maybe could get there
It's interesting to speculate how you could achieve very high speed to get to somewhere but how can you break when you get there?
Turn the ship around?
@@fredjackson8408 I don't think you understand the basics of physics 😅
As of what we know today...similar to how it is done today: when sending probes (let's say mars, saturn, etc) we use gravity to slingshot and accelerate; then we again use gravity (anti-slingshot/gravity well) to decelerate...or we simply go into orbit...first we steal energy then we donate energy.
Dr Kipping is Anthony Padilla if he had studied astrophysics instead of creating smosh. Can't be the only person who sees it.
I think the universe DID intend for us to use the loopholes! We just have to figure them out with the technology we have instead of fight with each other!
Sick.
Lex with the bed head
Fascinating
Okok all these theory about things travelling super fast. But that’s for a particle. How will a whole human being or multi-atomic object go through it?
No need too they're already here
go on then.
To robots talking to each other, you better listen.
Travel using Black Holes what?
They have to be detected in deep space first, let alone used as a transport hub. They cannot be directly imaged.
if they have a accreation disk they can be
@@1997camry Of course. There is even wild speculation of a Black Hole in our solar system 🤣🫣
Try D.C.
I'm struggling to see how the frequency of an electromagnetic wave would increase when you slingshot it around a black hole. The net frequency would remain the same without increasing the frequency of the input wave. Surely the only property of the wave that can be manipulated is the amplitude?
If an EM wave is merely a projection of the changing state of electrons traveling through space at the rate at which time propagates, you cannot increase the net frequency of a wave without increasing the rate of the flipping electrons at the input. 🤷
The frequency of an electromagnetic wave decreases as it propagates across the universe.
@@iCanSeeWhatMostCant yes, due to the expansion of the universe.
However, this is only true because we are also in the same expanding universe.
When the laser light leaves the vicinity of the black hole, it would go back to normal, making the net frequency the same as when it entered the vicinity of the black hole.
@@WayneMetcalf the spin of the blackhole might lead to net gain in frequency
Well technically a black whole it’s self could bring you to alternate Dimension but it’s would be similar to it also destroying light particles and then placing those particles in that dimension. What he talking about is using the gravity to go the speed of light which also the gravitational force of the black whole itself
@@iCanSeeWhatMostCant yes it would, but only while it is local to the black hole, once it is no longer local and it returns to normal space the frequency would return to the previous state to the observer.
Like squeezing the middle of a hose pipe, you get an increased flow around the compressed area but in front of it would be the same as before the compression.
Lex Friedman reminds me of Elizabeth Holmes
Book of Thoth states to not travel the cosmos in angles or lines lest the hounds at the gates get you immediately. Maybe that means our bodies like you say cannot handle speed of light travel maybe the hounds represent what happens to our bodies at that speed like tearing apart maybe.
So Thoth states to evade this travel in curves and circles. Such as the way the planets move, so in essence could we not sling shot planet to planet and as the gears of the universe are in motion like clockwork as a galaxy nears ours and we are already positioned in travel on a certain planet of ours maybe Pluto, so we’d hopscotch planet to planet in each gravity field so when we near Pluto and the next galaxies we sling shot to them.
So we are basically moving in spheres and in curves which could also mean to travel planet to planet not skipping over them for speed. Maybe that is the only viable way it will take longer but maybe safer. So not necessarily colonizing but travel points would be set up at these planets by tech and AI, and our broadcasting to them to control them like ground control and eventually it’s be like Star Wars ish lol. That’s the extent of my brain in this arena. ❤
DMT is the road map left to us to get to the stars. It’s use allows us to ask how to safely navigate the cosmos, and our ancient ancestors had this knowledge in some capacity. Let’s not forget it. DMT gets our minds to the cosmos and helps us learn how to get our solid bodies to follow the trail. ❤
Can fentanyl do the same as DMT?
Why not do a conventional gravity assist around a single black hole? As long as you have great measurements and great math. lol.
Time dilation gets stronger the closer you get to a black hole
Nah man we gotta use pulsars. Neutron highway baby o7
What will help is reanimation from frozen
Black holes are not worm holes.
the problem is you reach a point of no return. there's no turning back. no repair or docking stations. no refueling or reloading supplies. total hostile environment. let's go!
At least give Lex a different Tie !
The human body can't handle that type of speed so it'll never happen just like only one time have they ever done a live broadcast from the moon 🤣🤣🤣
DAMN Lex looks absolutely drained
He def didn't shower that morning
@@galept or sleep that night
I think a very small black hole made its way into my wallet.
All aboard event horizon
So it’s basically just science fiction. Got it.
Anthony padilla!!??!
Awesome awesome awesome...
Well He may sound crazy and delusional about that Neutrino sling short idea, But that's how Concepts are Born, you got to see it first before your realise in Reality, Human beings are powerful and unlimited