What Killed Zumwalt Destroyers?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 чер 2024
  • The Zumwalt-class destroyers are some of the most ambitious warships in the history of American shipbuilding.
    The railgun, weaponized lasers, and the most advanced supersonic missiles are just a handful of the capabilities that were predicted to be on this ship. Even today, however, the fleet has yet to find a clearcut purpose for it.
    So then what was the main obstacle for Zumwalt, exactly? Was it the ambition or rather the high cost?
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 45

  • @williamfarlow2442
    @williamfarlow2442 Рік тому +6

    As an electronics technology testbed, it's impressive. Considering that the vessel's stated primary mission, however, was fire support against land targets, and it ended up with two super sophisticated guns that had ammunition so insanely expensive that the Navy literally wouldn't be able to afford to fire them...yeah, that's a problem.

  • @phil20_20
    @phil20_20 2 роки тому +5

    Zumwalt: even the Chinese didn't copy it.

  • @vensb8862
    @vensb8862 2 роки тому +9

    Becoming closer and closer to become a museum piece.

  • @CokeCheese
    @CokeCheese 10 місяців тому +2

    It's odd how we test prototype planes before committing to many, yet we build several of these even though so much of the tech needed to make them successful was either unproven or ungodly expensive. What a colossal waste. Build one and shake it down before committing to several and wasting billions. The incompetence involved is not only extremely dubious, but hilarious as hell.

  • @tolitsdterrible4785
    @tolitsdterrible4785 2 роки тому +15

    Just like any lousy and poorly designed product, it killed itself. End of the story.

  • @TonyUnplugged
    @TonyUnplugged 2 роки тому +9

    Complete waste of money like the LCS class. They could have built DDGs for $1.3 billion each.

  • @michaelsultzer6733
    @michaelsultzer6733 2 роки тому +3

    The ship is way to much cost on what seems as a test ship.

  • @kurtisvisser7805
    @kurtisvisser7805 2 роки тому +8

    They be better off building Battleship and battlecruiser again, then Zumwalt destroyer with all problems they with them.

  • @iDuckman
    @iDuckman 2 роки тому +2

    Building DD-1000 as a technology explorer is a good thing, provided that we can keep the Chinese from stealing what we have learned. They don't seem to budget limitations.

  • @danielstevenjanerico2530
    @danielstevenjanerico2530 2 роки тому +2

    I Lived In Bath,Maine .. B.I.W. / Bath Iron Work's Got A Work To Commission 3 Zummwalt Class Ship's .. After Built , They Get Sea Tested , If Pass , And They Did , They Go To Another Shipyard To Apply Technology And Unknown To Public Weaponry .. They Are Part Submarine , Part Ship .. Speed Like No Other , Stealth Like No Other .. Hence Nicknamed " Stiletto " .. Rest In Peace To Those I've Known Over Half Them Male And Female Ship Builder's ~ Semper Fi ~ Veritas ~ Hooorahhh ~ Cuddy's ~ Riverside ~

    • @djbeacon1942
      @djbeacon1942 2 роки тому +1

      Bath, Maine, is that near Cabbage Cove, Maine where Jennifer Fletcher lived in 'Murder, She Wrote'?

  • @spiffdandy77
    @spiffdandy77 2 роки тому +5

    Sounds like this ship is an easy kill with an EMP weapon.

  • @keithrichard6966
    @keithrichard6966 2 роки тому +4

    Get rid of the Zumwhalt looks like it's a 🍋 as we say it's always breaking down will it have a mechanical break down in the face of war? It's costing the American tax payer to much

  • @itch4travel
    @itch4travel Рік тому +1

    Same fate as the F22, stopped production.

  • @ffffffff963
    @ffffffff963 2 роки тому +1

    can hardly tell its a robot voice...wow

  • @ajctrading
    @ajctrading 2 роки тому +1

    obsolescence killed it.

  • @matthewfocke5360
    @matthewfocke5360 2 роки тому +1

    Will it ever be resolved and put to effective use without being scrapped...Money supplies are limited, just like the engineers' mental acuity in working on them...Too complicated? Do you need a bigger Brain Trust?

  • @user-rh3kz2kt1e
    @user-rh3kz2kt1e 2 роки тому

    Gorgeous 💚💛❤👍👍😙⛤

  • @ocevicheband502
    @ocevicheband502 2 роки тому +1

    At the scrap yard already?

  • @plantz590
    @plantz590 2 роки тому

    What a ...........

  • @mohhassanabdurajak3274
    @mohhassanabdurajak3274 2 роки тому +3

    The price is too high. Make in Korea or Japan will cost you much less.

  • @Jopino594
    @Jopino594 2 роки тому +1

    Like the LCS, the F-22, F-35... Jeez, I sure hope there's no war with Russia. Hope those F-15s are still holding up well...

  • @maoriboy7645
    @maoriboy7645 2 роки тому +3

    Big oars and a ps5 would have solved the issues 😆😜

  • @thetixman6688
    @thetixman6688 Рік тому +2

    im still waiting for you to tell me what destroyed it

  • @williamt.little1972
    @williamt.little1972 11 місяців тому +2

    Unjustified cost/expense killed these white elephants.

  • @michaelvillar7926
    @michaelvillar7926 2 роки тому +4

    The ship sucks! I knew from the start that it would not measure up to the other destroyers and cruisers.

  • @melissalydon3681
    @melissalydon3681 2 роки тому +1

    hypersonic missiles will help.

  • @johncheatham6616
    @johncheatham6616 Рік тому

    It was sneaking around in the early 80s. Its a shame they are bogged down in bueracratic ass dragging. The incredible cost has given the tax payer absolutely nothing.

  • @maxt3902
    @maxt3902 2 роки тому

    $$$$$$$$ still $$$$$$

  • @alamudesky1959
    @alamudesky1959 2 роки тому

    No weapon

  • @troyb.4101
    @troyb.4101 2 роки тому

    What the USAF was has been working onsince forever! Smaller misiles with greater power and range. Stealth, and better radars, and heat seeking equipment. My thought is after decades of work their misslie systems are going to make a lot of equipment outdated. No need to make billion dollar ships if you can wipe them out with a 100k misile from ranges unheard of! Even most aircraft, and other military equipment will be outdated soon enough.

  • @davidalvarez2194
    @davidalvarez2194 2 роки тому +1

    Very poor design and little thought to actual navy ship Just listening to these presentations gives one a headache .

  • @dunkermitcell83
    @dunkermitcell83 Рік тому

    Am disappointed ☹️😞 foooo,

  • @keithrichard6966
    @keithrichard6966 2 роки тому

    Y do Lockeed Martin and Rolls-Royce's Royce Delta and Boeing charge the American Government and the American tax payers so much when they all live here

  • @justinscott-lee7393
    @justinscott-lee7393 11 місяців тому

    📜BLM approves of all launch and ordinance's as Seen on this debriefing to the United European and United States artillertry navel and defense system as of now on that is all📜

  • @pedrohernandez-sk2tj
    @pedrohernandez-sk2tj 2 роки тому

    Take the guns off, except the railgun, the adjust the hypersonic, and improve the laser tech to the smotherings. Modified the to many fail tech problems to 0. The super computer is rather to large. EMP free!, the bags to secure electric EMP Attack, something like so maybe heavy layers of that stuff, painting it, cells, especially for the pacific fleet. a little makeover. lockheed martin is is so cheap. money money money. Make the damn Patriot missile system in steroids, also THAAD whats wrong with you? s400 s500 they do have more air defence systems, both do make a purpose. I think we can do better than that, and t=e new missile is costly. You know what party can reduce that default of money from the Arm forces.

  • @andreww1225
    @andreww1225 Рік тому

    don’t build anymore