10 Detective Riddles Only the Most Attentive 1% Can Solve
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 чер 2024
- Bright Side found 10 brilliant that only the smartest can solve. Watch a riddle, have 15 seconds to try to crack it, and move to the next one. Good luck!
Music Mountain Emperor by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) is licensed under a Creative Commons license
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
Subscribe to Bright Side : goo.gl/rQTJZz
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our Social Media:
Facebook: / brightside
Instagram: / brightgram
SMART UA-cam: goo.gl/JTfP6L
5-Minute Crafts UA-cam: www.goo.gl/8JVmuC
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more videos and articles visit:
www.brightside.me/ - Навчання та стиль
Hey guys! How many riddles did you get right?
And if you love murder riddles, click here ua-cam.com/video/CJc10xtJHgc/v-deo.html
i solved 4 riddles :D
BRIGHT SIDE hii
BRIGHT SIDE none
BRIGHT SIDE I got 4 riddles right
BRIGHT SIDE 3
What if the man jumped from the roof and not the window
true, true but did you see that there actually was no windows in the picture? like what?
True , also i assume that he would plunge head-first on to his death so most-likely he would be face down with his skull cracķed & not on his back ( he would have to be facing the person who shoved him off in order to land the way he did ) also this theory is only relevant if you base the riddle off of the sketch itself , i say this because one can't really notice if the windows are in fact open or closed !
How would he get onto the roof?
@@user-kl3rw1vt5r just like how he wouldve gotten on to any floor...using the stairs
BOOOM BOOLM BOOM!!
For the second riddle, I have to argue that the answer was rather illogical.
There could have been someone in 'his' room that would have opened the door for him.
It was the fact that he said 'Wrong room' and went for the direction of the elevators instead of his room, which raised my suspicion. Anyone else agree?
SharpTech Gaming That's what I thought too
never thought of that
It makes more sense that people who get to the wrong room do that because they have gone to the corrispondent room of another floor rather than to another room of the same floor as their, if you understand what I mean.
For me, what was suspicious was that if he thought it was his room. Why did he knock or not try to use his key?
Maybe he thought there would be someone to open it for him. (e.g. Wife, children, friends)
Bright Side:"OnlY tHe mOSt AtTenTiVE peOlPe caN SolVe tHem!"
Me: Watches 5 different riddle videoes, all sharing the same riddle
WAIT A MINUTE
I don’t understand fly in coffee. My answer for the riddle is that SHE LITERALLY SAW THE FLY AGAIN! He never said anything about there being sugar.
I also noticed Peter Griffin in the court room at riddle number 4! 😂
Lol
Yeah and some of them were in movies 😂
@@BullyMaguire2024 that true!
@@tanyitmengunofficial9381 I know right
I would sue the police if detectives actually solved cases like this
nice
Hahaha you are 100% correct
@@jeroenpro1499 how many riddles did you solved
@@yashwanthdivate1883 like 3 or so i think
😄
*Who else thinks that the questions are not well explained ????*
Know Berries I do
It is explained as riddles only u use your brain
These riddles are designed to catch you out with vague details... there is no way to solve them.
@@ArsenaL_YT i used my brain. For example number ten she was stabbed in the car. So im like alright so theres going to be blood in the car. But nope im wrong because they figure out a harder way
I do
It's not fair to have a riddle that leaves out important information. Like the guy with the gunshot wound in his car. If you leave out the information about what kind of car it is, the only way you can get that question right is if you simply guess. But when a riddle is designed to make someone guess it becomes unfair as there are too many possibilities. Also, My guess was that he was shot, but survived, got in his car and then bled out after locking himself inside, attempting to get further away. Which is just as good a possibility as the car being a convertible. Both answers are completely plausible, therefore no detective could possibly conclude that there is not entry point in the car because the roof was down, as there are many other possibilities, which again, makes this riddle unfair.
Same with the riddle of the fly in the coffee, how are we to know that she put sugar in her coffee? Are we supposed to guess? Because if we are supposed to assume that she likes sugar in her coffee, then that means we can also assume/guess other things like maybe there was a specific stain on the cup that she recognized, or maybe the fly was still in it, or maybe she simply saw him bring back the same cup.
When riddles intentionally leave out information that is key to the answer, it makes the riddle unfair and in my opinion, is no longer a riddle worthy of deduction. If you read this I thank you, even if this comment gets no replies I hope someone reads it because these so called "riddles" really annoy me.
BL4CK5M1TH 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
You didnt have to make the comment that long.
Im glad you guys read my comment, yes I understand I could have made it shorter, the reason it's long is honestly because this was a little frustrating and I wanted to be specific so that anyone who did read it would understand exactly what im trying to say.
BL4CK5M1TH agreed
but they added a cartoon drawing of a convertible
The answer of the second one can also be that since he went to the elevator, he couldn't have had his room on the same floor, and therefore couldn't have mistaken it for his room
I think the woman was judgmental.
BECAUSE, it's not necessary that there is only one person living in each room, there are STRONG possiblies that he was sharing his room with his family members or friends. And he can't take away the keys because it will give other roommates a tough time, if they want to go out, they can't go only because the man took the keys and he can't leave keeping the door open. Hence he did not take the keys and had to knock
Don't you think this is more logical?
@@Tawnyaise0 yeah man I think the riddle was wrong
yeah this is a far better answer
@@mw00295 ikr
are you trying to tell me those ice cubes didn’t melt the slightest bit when she had 5 iced teas, also who drinks 5 iced teas???
Me
So true while she was drinking her third cup the fifth and fourth cup the ice should have melted
@@fukumean77 but why would u order 5 teas at a time
@@helloiexist3333 You got me there.
She dint order all of them together she ordered one by one while waiting for the other one to finish
They don’t give enough information in most of them. And how would we know the lady put sugar in it?
That is the fastest I got. That's the point of a riddle . They told you she noticed it was the same, so you deduct : how she noticed.
Yes, because if you drink your coffee sweetened, you will definitely taste it before adding sugar.
Did you not see the sugar?
that is the purpose of this video mate..
I thought the coffee was still the same due to the temperature.
I have a question about the fly in coffee riddle. How are we supposed to know that she put the sugar on the table in the coffee?!?!
careforicebear because it tasted sweet in the end.
He is asking how we are supposed to know that she put it in the coffee before knowing the riddle. The answer is you do not know, and that riddle was not a good one. It would have been better if it said 'Just as she put in a spoonful of sugar, she noticed a fly... or something along those lines.
there were a lot like that....some had more than 1 answer also 'ice tea' doesn't have to have ice in it....its just the name of the drink like coke or pepsi...
Sometimes you have to think outside the box instead of thinking logically, and they specifically make the logical answer wrong and make the real answer stupidly obvious. I am not a fan of those kinds of riddles myself :p
tbh for that one i guessed that it would not have been as warm as freshly brewed coffee because she’d had it out for a while and that’s how she knew because honestly how tf are we supposed to know she likes sugar in her coffee
I tought he was smuggling him self😂🤦🏿♂️
😂
I got this right
i thought he was smuggling sand
Yeah me too. I missed this one.
That is a whole new level 😂
Real detectives on a case take weeks, months, or even YEARS to solve a case. Despite the easiness of these, there’s no real comparison. 15 seconds? Really?
yeah ur right
It’s not really forensics really it’s kinda a riddle
6:47 My mom tought me that if there's something nasty in your food, like a hair or bug or something, put a LOT of salt on it before sending it back. If you get your food back and it's salty, then you know they gave you the same food.
So either ways, your still putting it in your mouth cause you need to taste it right
what else would you do with food you ordered?
Genius
EthalaRide thank you for the life hack!
Or it's salty because the cook ejaculated in it. Enjoy slurping that to see if it's salty or not.
I never send food back. I eat it or leave.
wait but the riddle with the guy that was accused of killing his wife.... it was stated that " *everybody* in the room, turned and looked at the door" leaving me under the impression that every single person in the room was facing the door but the answer contradicted the riddle itself idk if I should be angry or what
But then it says that the lawyer and the defendant were looking at them(jury and judge), not at the door.
Radu Cora - But if the judge/jury were looking at the door, how would they know the lawyer and defendant weren't?
Another problem with this riddle is "almost immediately after that, the jury comes up with a guilty verdict". This isn't how verdicts work - jurors come up with their verdicts after *all* courtroom proceedings have ended, and they don't do so in the courtroom but in a separate deliberation room.
Ah ha!! the lawyer was his accomplice since he wasn't looking at the door either...
I though it was because his wife didn’t enter the room, meaning the lawyer had lied.
i remember bingewatching detective mystery solving videos when i was 10 and this channel is one of those. now i'm a few years away from studying psychology at a university with a vast understanding of human behaviour considering that i'm only 16. coming back to these types of videos really brought back memories and nostalgia.
Well done!!!
Dude psych is awesome
Case 6: The man might had been shot first and then he tried to escape and get into the car but died of bleeding.
Maybe his window was open and someone shot him while driving by
CHOUDHARY_SAHAB then there should be blood on where he was shot to his car
I thought the same but his answer was different
No man can do this after getting shooted at head
Yukizuchi
If the window was open, why did the description of the scene say that the doors were locked and the windows were closed?
Okay but you have to TELL US she put sugar in the coffee beforehand in order for it to be a fair riddle. We can't just assume that.
Right!!!!
Seems to me that she would have noticed the fly as she was putting the sugar in the coffee. So that means the fly came after she put the sugar in the coffee. Also the new cup of coffee should have been hot to the touch. But i do like the riddles. And the 2 ladies that were drinking the iced tea that was a true story. That shouldn't have been a riddle.
the answers for those riddles arent definite, it could be anything. she could have seen the waiter or whatever
Exactly!
you must had notice the sugar cubes right next to the pancakes
Some ridlles really have no logic.
Is it the ice cubes
that first one
I solved 6
Yeah smuggling bycicles is ludicrous as they can be transported legally. By this logic, he could have also been "smuggling" sand or bags.
by some you mean pretty much all of them
7:12 bruh you said everybody in the room
I know. I don’t get it. He literally said my wife will come in the room but he knew she wouldn’t. Why on earth would he say that? If he knew she wouldn’t come he should have also known he would die for lying.
Plot Twist: The Fly Wants A Cup Of Coffee
*All flaws in the riddles:*
9. Hotel Room:
- the woman could have been suspicious because the man left towards the elevators.
- it is plausible that the man knocked because he was staying with someone and didn't have a key. I've knocked on my own hotel room door many times.
7. Ice Tea:
- the animations do not match up as there are no ice cubes depicted in the ice tea. So here we have to assume that the women have ice in their drink.
6. Mysterious death in the car:
- again, we have to assume information about the type of car, which does not make it a riddle.
- the man also could have been shot, then locked himself in his car before bleeding out.
5. Fly in coffee:
- how are we to know that she put sugar in her coffee? Are we supposed to guess? Because if we are supposed to assume that she likes sugar in her coffee, then that means we can also assume/guess other things like maybe there was a specific stain on the cup or lipstick on it that she recognized, or maybe she simply saw him bring back the same cup.
4, In court for killing the wife:
- this is by far the stupidest riddle... the riddle states "Everybody in the room, including the judge and jury, turns and looks at the door." This should include the man who killed his wife.
3. A case of a smuggler:
- how are we to assume that he doesn't smuggle clothes, or hats, or shoes into the country as he would be wearing them as well.
- plus, "smuggle" is not the correct word to use here. By definition, smuggling is the act of "moving (goods) illegally into or out of a country." It is not illegal to bring bikes in and out of countries, even if those bikes are stolen. This is a very misleading use of the word smuggle.
All the others are fine (although a little misleading).
Thanks for reading XD
I agree with you on all of these except the court killer one. It specifically states that everyone looks at the door, while the defendant and his attorney stared at the jury to see there response. It made it clear that the killer was not looking at the door.
True, but also just because he doesn't look at a door should not mean he is guilty... people would be looking for more substantial evidence than that.
This is all so accurate and true
About the Ice tea, of course ice teas have ice, I mean who would enjoy ice tea without ice
True haha
I didn't solve many.
But I'm playing the: *English isn't my first language and I couldn't understand everything.* - Card
Ican'tHandleHobisBoogieBootyAnymoreSendHelp this actually really is an excuse for the first one :D
English isn't the first language of whoever wrote these either. It is probably the first language of the actor reading it, though.
Nice username
Ican'tHandleHobisBoogieBootyAnymoreSendHelp i love you username XD
Ican'tHandleHobisBoogieBootyAnymoreSendHelp, You have a very creative username.
Got 7 of them right but still some of them were absurd and not clearly stated and could possibly have different sensible explainions.
Nice work I got 6
Who else noticed the incorrect order of the numbering??
👇
ok but if the roof was open when he was shot, how did it close after?
Wow your a smart kid I didn't even think of that respect seriously how did it close by itself
army!!
the killer closed it
Ikr
i closed it
Video : *What does he smuggle?*
Me : *He smuggles sand.*
Edit 1 : *OMG! 870 likes! Thanks guys.. love ya :D*
Same.
same
Maybe he is smuggle gold... because gold is same as sand.... 😇😇😇
Lol because of sand
I laughed so hard at this
Glass broken:
Me:
WHAT WHERE IS THE SHATTERED GLASS
What if he didnt wanted to reveal his identity and putted question mark on the note 🤔
cool name because the note also said “that’s who threw the snowball”
There’s not enough detail, especially the fly in the coffee, you should’ve said that she had previously put sugar in her coffee.
ikr, it could have been cold, heck, it could've still had the fly in it!
I seen the sugar on the table, which made me guess it would of been to sweet if she put more sugar in the same coffee.
Lauren Bray I said the same thing.. Im like how did we know the windows had to be opened for him to throw out the cigarettes, how did we know it was a convertible.. Yea, just not enough information..
It says he opened the window and threw the cigarette out the window, went to the next floors and repeated the action. I agree about some of these being worded poorly. They are riddles, they're not going to spell it out for you. You need to read the words carefully and think outside the box. But these seem to have more than one logical solution. Dumb
But yea, the convertible one was terrible.
The problem with bright side is that their “riddles” always have multiple possible answers and they stump you from solving the puzzles by omitting important information, information that would be clear had you been part of the actual situation, but not all omitted information is actually important so you more or less have to guess as to what they left out and if it is or is not going to lead you to the answer
Bright side does really misleading tests lets be real
like the fly in coffee they didn't say she put sweetener
I agree the solid ones could win you a drink at a bar the sketchy ones could get you beat up
I agree, last test stated the husband had been informed his wife was dead and had to come to the crime scene. ANYONE could assume that the police told him where his wife died ESPECIALLY since he was given information about her!
Alex Tucker no the right thing to do is to NOT invite the husband into the crime scene because the closest relative will always be the first suspect. It was a clear trap. You didn't want your suspect to came into the crime scene and tarnish it right? For victim confirmation it usually happens in the morgue because a dead human can wait. It's just wordplay. In this tests you simply need to find irregularities. But some i agree, like that coffee case is straight up dishonest as for keeping an important detail hidden simply to make it seems harder or more random.
Why this video has so many likes? 90% of the comments are from people who complain about the illogical riddles lol
OMFG the one in the Ice I remember my teacher asking us about in 6th grade and I was the only person to figure out the answer in my class so I was a bit excited about seeing that one lol.
Could’ve told us it was a convertible...
It had a pic of a convertable
if we're going by the picture then we have to ask the question, how is the roof now up if he got shot when the roof was down?
Wouldn't have closed after being shot
galaxy girl gaming I've never seen a covertable. I would not have know that was a convertablw
GoalzGoneWild thats what I was thinking
Intentionally leaving key information out does not a riddle make.
Owning the same nail polish does not a murderer make?
6235river I didn't get any right because the miracle never happen
this is like more a funny pop quiz than a riddle
Ok, someone hears a gunshot. Runs in, sees the scene. Sees a recorder. Rewinds it, to hear it. And then calls police. That is very out there and I'm sure no one would replay a recorder after seeing a suicide, but who knows.
10:18 the voice says suspected but the word says suspended😂
not enough detail. You need to be more specific or we cant figure out the riddles.
Ziadus that's why it's called a riddle
it doesn't make sense
Bryce Cravens i would not call these a riddle. Riddles are usually complex but have a logical solution contained within the riddle itself. Questions here are vague and do not give you any logical solution within the text. For example, Riddles are like figuring out that two plus two is four. Whereas these questions give you the number four, then you have to play a guessing game if the rest was either two times two or one times four.
With certain ones, there were things that could be assumed if other ways of solving it or just not enough to have a conclusion
no...for example the tea one never mentioned the sugar....they could have just said "the lady then put some sugar in her drink and drank blah blah blah but then saw a fly"
how did the guy in the car close the convertible top after being shot?
The murderer closed the top probably
Lily Armstrong he could have just as easily closed the car door. The riddle was irrelevant 🤔
was thinking the same thing before I see your comment
I Too Had This Question.
Magic
The man with the recording, many old tape players/recorders auto rewind when they hit the end of the tap
also he could rewind the cassette before he attempts to unalive himself right?
I just got 2 correct answers! Please do a lot of this kind of videos!
Who else lies to themselves by pretending to feel good when you "solve" a riddle you have heard before.
TitanicMeteor me
TitanicMeteor just to be honest
Mee i got em right some
Skyla Greenway i heard ? Blacksmith and Ice tea and hotel room one
I SAID 8TH QUESTIONS CORRECT
These riddles have multiple solutions
true
Ya but they only made one to challenge your brain I mean that's what challenges is all about
derekmcgoldrick true
The best investigators take their time (not 15 seconds) and no information can be left out.
In the 5th one, the question doesn't mention that the woman had had the coffee before shouting!! Bye the way I would have shouted to check the waiter's expression to deduce is it the changed cup or not!!
firstly, quit using misleading graphics.
secondly, there's a difference between a riddle, and being bad at communication.
There's also a difference between being tricked by the riddle and riddle having a flaw in it.
Xkcd comes to mind. Indeed, the questions posed by these riddles seem to have multiple potential explanations, and claiming only one of them is valid makes for a very bad riddle for several reasons.
Very true because in number 8 it clearly showed no windows on any of the floors and in the end it was clear that all the windows have been closed even though the showed building given to us has no windows-_-
Really ten, nine, and seven had to be “don’t look the picture it doesn’t show resemblance to the riddle”
Yea
Not that I've ever killed anyone, nor intend to, but I think if I had killed someone, and I was told they were about to walk into the room, I would be as curious as heck as to who was going to come in!
Basically,the one with the wife is wrong,since we were told EVERYONE in the room turned to look at the door
BASICALLY, the lawyer knows that his client is the murderer and they planned the whole 'wife is gonna enter' story to make the judge bail him out... so the murderer wasn't curious as he knew no one would show up
*BASICALLY* the husband was actually wife with plastic surgery after killing the husband
So she was looking at herself
Not only that, but in such a case wouldn't the man also know about the plan of the lawyer? Besides the lawyer didn't look at the door as well
@@alexapadackles118 Maybe someone at the door had a big mirror. Thought of that, huh?
best part of bright side is that no ads are there to interrupt you
like if u too liked this feature of our favourite youtube riddle chaanel
These bright side video make me think I m Sherlock Holmes 🤣🤣
Zero.. i guess thats why i work at walmart
HipsterBot my brother works at dollar general also known as DG
HipsterBot the second one was easy,
cause if you think about it,
People would just walk in, if it was locked they would unlock it.
but thats just me..
Marian Marionette .. im sure if my attention was better (i was playing pubg) i might have figured a couple. I did the same thing with the other videos lol
HipsterBot meh. Like i said, its just me. :p
most of the riddles contained information that hadn't been discloses to us, so it is unfair to say that we must have 'assumed' that the situation was like it was
e.g., the ice in the ice tea, the convertible car, the sugar
the car in the picture was a convertible. But it's true that that was unfair. I assumed the window was down then someone came and pulled it up again.
yea, the sugar was so shady. my answer was possibly a small smudge of her lipstick on the cup.
The ice tea one I got right only because of the picture but the convertible i didn’t pay attention to that well but the sugar one definitely mislead
The first one threw me for a loop, because i was expecting a Detective riddle, not an Dumb Wordplay that happenes to feature an Detective.
The picture of her lips indicated no lipstick, but there was a bowl of sugar on the table. What may be difficult is that some riddles are solved by the picture, others by the stated information. The first one was the most clever IMO. Poison in the ice cubes the most difficult.
Solved every riddle save for the second to last one.I observed the facts of that one but couldn't draw any conclusions. Good way to test my deductive reasoning powers. Good video.
I cant remember how many times I've seen all these riddles already, you use the same riddles each video
Y did the lady put sugar even if it contained fly :p
that's right....who knows?
Nope.. may be to trap the waiter as she knew he would just remove the fly and bring back same cup
The most likely guess is that she put sugar before she noticed the fly.
The fly was on the bottom of the sugar cube? Back of the spoon? Who knows, bad riddle regardless.
Lokesh Agrawal she might be drinking black coffee...after mixing suger the fly might have surfaced and she noticed
"Everyone in the room looked at the door", 20 seconds later "The man did not look at the door"
“ and the lawyer with the defendant look at them”
Beschdl it's from a korean movie the client
At first I understood that as the Layer was with the defendant and looked at them. Not necessarily that the defendant also looked at them. They should have said "the layer AND the defendant looked at them.
HAHAHA I WAS THINKING THE SAME THING. these are so rearded
The writing says "The lawyer with the defendant look at them" the guy speaking says "the lawyer with the defendant lookS at them" bad delivery.
i love how 'sherlock holmes' and 'detective' are always in the same sentence.
There's another answer to the hotel one; the man walked towards the elevators, he wouldn't have changed floors if he thought that it was his room.
Not good - could have multiple answers
Yeah but like in any other cases you can make story out of it but only have one truth
8/10. The iced tea and window one were both ridiculous.
Edit: This apparently has 250+ likes now 😂.
the ice tea was, the window kinda is, but i have seen it before.
what if he jumped from roof and not window?
Cyanide7662 ....the literal name is called iced tea, so it has ice in it.
There's a great version of the iced tea riddle that is more complicated but makes more sense in terms of a plausible story:
A man is watching a baseball game at his local bar when another man, we'll call him Tony, walks in and orders to scotches both on the rocks. When the drinks are served the first man asks to switch with Tony and they do. Tony drinks his drink quickly, talks for a few minutes and leaves while the other man stays behind to finish his drink and the baseball game. A few hours later, he is dead and Tony knows it.
Answer:
Tony is a hit man for the maffia and the other man is a snitch who is paranoid that there's a hit out on him. Hes naturally suspicious when Tony orders him a drink, but after switching glasses, feels much safer. What he doesn't know is that Tony has done his research. Tony knows this guy is a baseball fan and will slowly sip his scotch during the long game. So he arranges with the bartender to have the poisoned ice cubes added to both drinks and his assassination is successful.
Dr. Mike Zahalsky same
I love the one when they tell the husband his wife was killed, and call him to the crime scene. And then he shows up and they grab him. Hahaha!!!
1:30 questions mark blacksmith.. so that would be mark blacksmith.. also.. if the snowball was that strong to break the window.. why isnt there glass all over the floor? If the snowball was really thrown from the outside, there would be glass on the floor.. im getting suspicious...
another answer for the last cassette riddle is that if a person killed themselves, they wouldn't be able to stop the recording because they are dead
Isabel Song yes that's exactly what I was thinking!!
Tape recordings stop automatically when they run out of tape.
That is also what I thought
The gun shot sound was heard in the recording
Also, the gun would be on the floor, basic forensics.
Moral of the story: dont name your kid question mark
Yep
Exactly.
lol
the kids name was Mark...not question Mark
Or mark
ight there goes my hope in me becoming a detective
At 2:54, there’s another answer. If he thought it was his room, his REAL room would’ve been somewhere around there. But it says that he headed for the elevator which shows that he was lying
8. Or he jumped from the roof...
You are a genius 😂😂😂
😂😂
exactly
If they saw him 'jump out a window' then couldn't they have at least told him which one? And what if the window has a ledge on it that he could stand from first? He might have closed it behind him to make sure no one came up and tried to save him through the open window.
yeh but they dont know whether he jumped out a window, why would they?
but if she always drinks her coffee with sugar then why did she taste the new one before putting in sugar ???
Good point good point well played
Maybe she puts sugar as usual and it was too sweet, so she knew it was the same cup. But why would she put sugar in the first cup of coffee if she saw a fly in it?
Maybe she was testing it to be sure it was different
she put the sugar after she saw the fly. She usually drink coffe without sugar
@@mia_the_nerd1315 why would taste the coffee if see thought it once had a fly in it? She should of got up and went to Starbucks they only have ants in their coffee.
If "everyone in the room turned and looked at the door", then that includes the defendant, since he's in the room. Makes no sense to later say he didn't look.
I thought the answer to the 2nd question was "if the guy had mistaken his room to other, the odds are his room is just next to the room he knocked but instead walk in the elevator".
How am I suppose to know if there was ice or windows in the building or glass ?
The title of the riddle is "Ice Tea" and the narrator said that they were drinking iced tea
iced tea doesn't require ice in it >.>
The one with the building, it mentioned that the detective opened the windows facing the mans body
Lil Trump the best Ice tea is more like a slush
Mk_cmk igneous He said it was Ice Tea and that the detective opened the windows on every floor.... I will give you some wiggle room on the Bike one and Convertible.
This title is extremely inaccurate attentive means good listener pay attention to important and details store information to keep in mind and remember when looking for your final answer most of these answers require assumptions that dont relate to how good you were listening
Unkown ElectronicMusic yeah like the sugar one. It never says she puts sugar in it so you just have to assume
GavinT1101 Even the one In court for killing the wife. He said everyone looked at the door, but at the end he said the husband didn't look at the door. So you just have to assume he didn't.
Unkown ElectronicMusic I
Last one was like the scene from THE DEPARTED. "I gave you the wrong address, but you showed up at
the right one!"
most of these can be explained in multiple ways, or are inherently flawed from the beginning
Some of them aren't fair, the details of the riddle should be in the text, if otherwise, it is only pure speculation, like if there is sugar on a table, that doesn't mean you used it, or the fact that it didn't say she took a drink either.
an angry shadow 2 I was thinking the same thing it never specified that it had sugar in the coffee
Josh Bowers same thing with the convertable.
Exactly. For the coffee riddle I guessed that she knew because the coffee wasn't freshly hot or it was lukewarm. For the car riddle I guessed that the man was shot somewhere else from long range and the murderer dragged his body into the car, then used the car keys to lock everything from the outside (but I guess that wouldn't make sense, since if the murderer had dragged him he probably would've rubbed gunpowder off onto the man's clothes, not to mention the bloodstains).
Agreed, I watched this since I have a degree in forensics and criminology, most of the riddles are not designed to be solved or have holes in logic.
10: just a riddle
9: is logical
8: "Man is said to jump out window" how do you know this if there were no witnesses to see and all windows were closed, also why could he have jumped off the roof?
7: never mentions key component of riddle
6: would not be hard to tell if you saw the scene and the key factor to quell the confusion was left out
5: again never mentions key component of riddle
4: how did the jury know that the defendant did not look at the door if they were all looking at the door and not him? Also, how are we supposed to know that the defendant did not look at the door. Also, he is still innocent until proven quilt so we cant make the assumption that he had killed her and therefore did not look for her.
3: how does he get back without his bicycle on a daily bases, and at some point they would notice that he always comes back without the bicycle and most likely travels with different bicycles.
2: who said that the police did not hit the rewind button before the play button?
1: good logic trick
Only 3 of the questions are fair.
On an unrelated note, this comment got way too many likes.
Yh no offence but some of the answers were dodge af and there could’ve been a bunch of reasons
But then again it’s like a real investigation where you barely get any information
Faris Maniar which just makes it worse that they expect us to suspect something without the evidence. If the detective got the information we got he would be unable to make an arrest as he would just be guessing and assuming extra things
Jayson that is true as most of them lack crucial information
The coffee one didn't tell us there was already sugar in the coffee, I thought it was cos the fly was still there
Faris - no it's not. If you wanna see how real investigations go watch First 48. That is real as it gets.
#9 could be explained EASILY!!! He could be in the hotel with his wife or a friend and left to do something without the key.
When he was apologizing, he said "I thought it was my room". If that was true, I'm sure he would remember which number his room has and he wouldn't be knocking on her door
@@adri_144
But people make mistakes. Maybe he was a little tired and wasn't thinking clearly. Maybe the room was in the same place on a different floor and his mind subconsciously went to that room. You can't automatically assume the worst.
@@skyj2172 of course not but this wasn't a real case, it was an example for a logical question. You have to work with the info you're given and don't add/change anything or your asnwer will be wrong
It’s funny I’m doing these video things considering I’m actually trying to get a degree to become a detective lol
I don’t think the investigators got 15 seconds to solve the mystery.
Theres the pause button.......
uoy said is
Can anyone understand what a joke is?
Waisu THANK YOU
If he was smuggling bicycles, how was he coming back to his country? On foot, or smuggling the same looking bicycle back where he came from?
He rode across everyday with an old bicycle and rode back later with a new one.
That doesn't make sense
Rafał Figiel
He smuggled Sneakers back to the US 😳
Shoes, clothes ,caps,gold in tyres
I feel like if I was a detective witnessing these events I would be able to solve them because the description gives not enough information. Like with the husband in the court room I would be able to see everyone looking at the door rather than the description saying “Everyone looked at the door” because then I have to make the assumption EVERYONE looked at the door.
And the woman with the coffee. If I was there I would know that she put sugar in her coffee rather than somehow assume she did.
Same thing with the man jumping out of the window. As the detective I would see the window was closed and recognize that.
Some of these riddles have multiple plausible answers.
SPOILER
ALERT
For example, look at riddle #5 (Fly in coffee) @6:06. The answer is that "she already put sugar in her previous cup of coffee". The riddle never mentioned sugar before that. The riddle could have said "she noticed a fly in her sweetened coffee", but it didn't. The riddle never mentions sugar. How are we supposed to assume she puts sugar in her coffee? It is also possible that the woman knew it was her cup of coffee because she had a lipstick stain on the rim of the cup of coffee. Neither sugar nor lipstick was mentioned in the riddle and both would be a reasonable guess.
Yes
I love how most of these would be impossible to figure out unless you either had more details or were actually there.
you miss out really important details. Like you didn't say the coffee had sugar in it, and didn't say the car was a convertable.
Ponz it’s not supposed to
Leaving out important details is part of it lol
Vex_ Hunter thats how I figured it out
or for example, who the heck closed the roof?
Or he could have been shot outside of the car then placed inside
First riddle, it was the detective himself because there were no glass pieces inside the room and the snowball hasn't melted yet. So that means either he cleaned the glass pieces and threw them away, but then the snowball should have melted. OR the detective shattered the glass from the inside and the glass pieces were on the outside of the house
The second riddle is also possible to explain in another way, in a hotel the roomnumbers have a logical numerisation, like the first figure is which floor the room is. So it is impossible the person went to a different floor than the first number of his room
Unknown man:
Me:
Wait you would have tried using a key-
LIES!
Information: "Everybody in the room, including the judge and the jury, turns and looks at the door..."
Answer: "The man who had been accused wasn't looking at the door."
You LITERALLY said that EVERYBODY was looking at the door. You didn't say only the jury and the judge, you said INCLUDING.
Nater K it said that the lawyer and the defendant looked at the other people and that’s when the lawyer said that they had reasonable doubt that the wife was dead. BOOM
Nater K for real and if the car roof was down when he shot him who put it up after he died
Nater K
exactly it would make more sense if someone shot him and placed him there... and also if they got a clear shot (when car was roofless) why would he not have any gunpowder residue on his body
Why would a man even be on trial for killing his wife without a corpse to prove that she was dead? Why would anyone look at the door in the courtroom if that corpse existed?
Hold on smart arse..how bout this.(man shot dead inside car) he was shot somewhere else and then the body was placed in the car)
Himprabal Kaushik I was saying the same thing
thought so too because THERE MUST BE gundowder on his clothes, with or without wind, it will stick on fiber.
I was thinking he was shot and trying to drive himself to the hospital LoL
@@trejosworld Me too! He was definitely shot elsewhere.
That's what I was thinking too
they weren't explained or done right but still got everyone of them right.
you didnt even tell us the girl put sugar on her coffee so no one would get that right :(
thats the only riddle i got wrong -_-
dude, so you never give enough information
That's the point, he only gives the information that the detective would know when first entering the crime scene.
lillian king he is giving less than the detective has for example during the car one ,we don't know what type of car he has, but a detective would
William Armstrong i think the car one (get shot in the car, but theres no bullet hole anywhere), the type of the car was inform in the picture
The cup of coffee one had different answers, and not information. Like wouldn't she see the fly while mixing or putting sugar in her drink? I said because she already drank out of it and they didn't refill it.
Yeah I thought of lipstick as well. Like there are a few answers to the coffee one
*sORE WA CHIGAU YO!*
A lot of the riddles used evidence that wasn't mentioned in the text (sometimes the evidence was in the images, sometimes it wasn't friccin there are all)
Crazy at Heart It bugs me that you didn't capitalize the s in "sore".
10/10
Reference
I think you're right. The one with the the coffee didn't make since. I didn't know they put sugar in coffee. Second of all, they didn't say there was sugar in the coffee.
Isabella 27 lol
Jada Fisher they could have added an info like "a woman with a sweet tooth" to hint about the sugar
00:10 "scientifically proen thst u must solve 10 detective riddles every day to exercise your brain"
Me who sometimes solves riddles
Among Us comes to the rescue boiss
This is so difficult that maybe even Cole Phelps can't even solve them.
Death in the car: The car door could have also been open when the man was shot, then locked and closed afterwards.
yeah
Or the person was shot by someone inside the car.
My car doors lock automatic after 2 min, even if key is in the igniction.
Or he could have been shot outside of the car and died trying to get to the hospital
@@celam1095 exatcly my thought
the smuggler one is terrible, he could even smuggle sand bags, or mexican hats, there was no evidence he had a new bike everytime
Populous3 Tutorials I know. I assumed he was using the same bike. There was nothing to indicate otherwise. I figured he was smuggling the sandbags too.
That’s the entire point of these riddles. Your brain naturally wants to assume and fill in the holes of the story with what you deem the most logical. And that’s why people don’t get them right.
I got all of these right and I did that by reading the facts given and watching closely to see what my brain would automatically assume without any facts. That’s how I figured out the answers.
For example with the smuggling one, I read “...crosses the Mexican border on his bicycle everyday” and I pictured the man crossing the border over and over on the same red bicycle and then I quickly realized that it didn’t say “his bicycle” but rather “a bicycle” and my brain had just automatically assumed he was riding the same bike everyday. That’s when I guessed he was smuggling different bikes in or (because who tf smuggles bikes) he was smuggling the tires of a bike or some important part of a bike.
Amanda Burns I don't believe you got all of them right. Not at all.
Ken Martin I believe her due to the fact that I myself got almost all of them right just a few like the one with the windows and the guy who jumped out. I assumed it was something to do with the cigarette. So I wouldn’t be surprised if she got all of them right.
XtremeGaming Yeah, I can see a person getting most of them right, but not all. Especially the one with the "convertible" car that really didn't even make sense. I just don't believe that anyone got all of them right. I'm not buying it.
I have an another answer for 9, the man could have not mistake an entire floor level and the whole room itself at the same time.
On number 10 also, there was no sign that a kid had busted the window inside of the house and there were no shards on the inside of the house
this is just great. I feel like my brain is working out(exercise)!!!
7:57 I thought that was so because the lawyer couldn't proove anything and wasted the court's time.
2:40 The man could have been sharing his room with someone else. So, he could have actually been mistaken.
@@cluky-wf3hz what if it was a new person goes to the elevator down to his floor then go to the same room as the one above him
It was also possible he was trying to look for a room of a friend and was accidentally given the wrong room number.
Could be possible
But he should have checked the room number before knocking.
So the guy was shot dead and then closed the roof on his convertible? makes sense
Drum bum yeah I thought someone was in the car with him but apparently not
+Drum bum exactly
Actually some convertible are controlled by sound so it would open after the gunshot and close back up automatically
William Hathaway ...what? The convertible’s roof was open before the gunshot. No way could it open as soon as the gunshot sound was detected, as you claim. Those things take a couple seconds to open/close.
And really, convertible roofs automatically open to loud sounds? Why?
+William Hathaway by the these "sounds" are usually human voices and not those loud gunshots
If the man in the car shot his wife and he wiped off fingerprints, why would he not be a suspect? His fingerprints should have been all over the car. Would he have been able to wipe all of his fingerprints off of the car?