Indeed: Marxists (and they are in control of the current Dem Party) hate not just nationalism but patriotism (because Western liberal democracy is racist and oppressive), and so want to subvert it in favour of some sort of coercive utopia; hence open borders aimed at getting a majority of the “oppressed”.
Isn't determining who should come into the United States an example of centralized control over immigration? You would have some bureaucrat determine who is worthy of immigrating instead of having the market determine this.
No . We are a Constitutional Republic with a federalist bent for a reason . That's a good question , but there are some things we have ceded control to the federal government because of the dangerous impracticality of , for example : each state having their own monetary system - or their own standing army - or sovereign control of the countries international borders ( protected by a military with a CIVILIAN Commander in Chief ) .
Enforcement of laws is not and ought not to be a market-driven issue. One of the functions of gov't. is to regulate the market through lawmaking. This can easily go amok - but then so can a markets with no prohibitions or restrictions (cf. Lars Ulbricht and the 'internet silk road.')
@@HuntingTarg and to be fair, I do think that the government should have a closed border and that we should vet immigrants to be sure that they aren't criminals or terorrists. So I do favor some centralized government control. But I do think this vetting should be limited as long as the immigrants aren't getting services that citizens get.
Thomas Sowell is my compass on many issues, whatever he explains in detail that is the direction I’ll take!
Mr. Sowell, we are blessed to have you and your voice of reason!
When the citizens are overlooked and "immigrants" provided for, stop and help your American citizens!!!!!!
They all know what’s going on. What’s happening is exactly what they want to happen.
Indeed: Marxists (and they are in control of the current Dem Party) hate not just nationalism but patriotism (because Western liberal democracy is racist and oppressive), and so want to subvert it in favour of some sort of coercive utopia; hence open borders aimed at getting a majority of the “oppressed”.
Though fashions may change admiration of the emperor’s clothes is always in style. Ignoring common sense is the hallmark of the intellectual.
Thomas Sowell is the most common sense practical human on earth.
"find out about their disease rate", well said Mr. Sowell. By the way, you do sow truth well!
So-well. 😎
Legendary economist ❤
One of the few times I disagree with Thomas Sowell , no they shouldn't be allowed to stay if they were PhDs , they are here illegally , no compromise.
The Executive Branch, through the INS, has the authority to grant amnesty or clemency to illegal aliens. The question is, 'should it, and if so when?'
CALIFORNIA CONSERVATIVE:
0:57
Preach pastor Sowell, preach! 🫵😫
It's for elections.
When was this filmed?
Isn't determining who should come into the United States an example of centralized control over immigration? You would have some bureaucrat determine who is worthy of immigrating instead of having the market determine this.
No . We are a Constitutional Republic with a federalist bent for a reason .
That's a good question , but there are some things we have ceded control to the federal government because of the dangerous impracticality of , for example : each state having their own monetary system - or their own standing army - or sovereign control of the countries international borders ( protected by a military with a CIVILIAN Commander in Chief ) .
Enforcement of laws is not and ought not to be a market-driven issue. One of the functions of gov't. is to regulate the market through lawmaking. This can easily go amok - but then so can a markets with no prohibitions or restrictions (cf. Lars Ulbricht and the 'internet silk road.')
@@HuntingTarg and to be fair, I do think that the government should have a closed border and that we should vet immigrants to be sure that they aren't criminals or terorrists. So I do favor some centralized government control. But I do think this vetting should be limited as long as the immigrants aren't getting services that citizens get.
Who was that at the end?
Finish the wall and decorate it with VPig harris
Why isn’t this voice of reason a candidate in the Nov election?
Because reason is always overthrown in American election campaigns.
I think he is in his 90s. Our loss he never was.
This podcast is interrupted by a shocking chat ‼️someone unknown- not one of the originals Sowell & interviewer are this strange foreigner talking
I do not understand your comment, will you explain please?
She's an extremely weak person to allow what's happening, no good for in anyone.