1:17 in my test, this one was considered a correct answer... I cannot believe how it is such a widespread misconception. Thanks for stating that it's wrong and not equivalent to the correct interpretation (F).
Actually, I'm getting confused now. I understand why D isn't true, but aren't A and F equivalent? I cannot see the difference. If the true value falls in the intervals 95% of the time, doesn't that mean that for any given interval, there's a 95% chance that it contains the true value...?
I get confused on how to determine which set of intervals provide stronger evidence. How would I do so given the list below? I know I look for the options that do not contain 1 because they are statistacally significant but once I narrow down to the last 2 what are the indicators? A. Industrial radiographers: 1.15 (0.53-2.19) B. Nuclear power plant: 5.55 (4.88-6.29) C. Dose-response: 1.10 (0.96-1.27) D. Shipyards: 9.97 (8.50 - 11.63)
1:17 in my test, this one was considered a correct answer... I cannot believe how it is such a widespread misconception. Thanks for stating that it's wrong and not equivalent to the correct interpretation (F).
Actually, I'm getting confused now. I understand why D isn't true, but aren't A and F equivalent? I cannot see the difference. If the true value falls in the intervals 95% of the time, doesn't that mean that for any given interval, there's a 95% chance that it contains the true value...?
Great video - well explained
I get confused on how to determine which set of intervals provide stronger evidence. How would I do so given the list below? I know I look for the options that do not contain 1 because they are statistacally significant but once I narrow down to the last 2 what are the indicators? A. Industrial radiographers: 1.15 (0.53-2.19)
B. Nuclear power plant: 5.55 (4.88-6.29)
C. Dose-response: 1.10 (0.96-1.27)
D. Shipyards: 9.97 (8.50 - 11.63)
Great, thanks!
THANK YOU