How is 60 fps worse than the first game!? Blows my mind. I want to play in 60 fps, but not looking all fuzzy. The 30 fps looks nice, but it's too jarring to play this way.
It's better then FFXVI but that's not saying much. SE needs to start dedicating some serious $$$$ towards optimizing their games better. I don't care how good your game is, if performance is bad, it drags the experience down. Ragnarok and Forbidden West should be the bare minimum level of fidelity that games are shooting for this deep into the consoles life cycle. Obviously they are running on different engines but it kind of ridiculous to be playing at 720p upscaled in 2024. The PS5 should not be running anything less then 1440p native or 1440p upscaled 4k for performance mode. This goes double for titles that are PS5 exclusives because they only require optimizing that specific hardware.
@@Entreped Forbidden West puts this to shame, both are open world with loads seemingly going on yet HFW looks insane in 40fps VRR mode and still solid in 60FPS mode
I can't understand why they can't tone down the effects and give us a propre resolution and fluidity... It's like prioritizing the toping over the cake
It's crazy too because they can't even use the excuse that it's being held back by PS4 limitations, this is a PS5 game through and through and it looks worse than tons of PS4 games do
Why a 40 fps mode is not standart in addition to 30 and 60 is beyond my understanding. I would love to play the game in native 1440p and 40 fps on my LG OLED TV. FSR upscaling looks so bad...
@@kingsnaka7592 So? Ratchet and Clank implemented a 40 fps mode if it detects a 120 Hz TV. Otherwise the option is greyed out. IMO this should always be an option.
I don’t know how this is a game built from the ground up for the PS5 yet struggles to run at 60 fps and at a lower resolution than the free final fantasy 7 remake update that came out years ago and ran at 60 fps at 1440p
I'm late to the party and am playing FF7 Rebirth right now. I have a 65" 4k Samsung tv. I've tried performance mode and it looks so blurry and faded I couldn't play the game because everything looks washed out. I had to change it to Graphics mode, but when I did there is screen tearing and judder effect. I tried to reduce it through the tv settings and it kind of reduced it somewhat.
people... you likely won't even notice that blurry aspect of performance mode. chill out. if you have a small 4k tv with 1080p(42 inch or so) sitting the recommended distance from the screen, you should barely see a difference unless you do a 4x zoom. if you have a gigantic 65 inch tv and you sit close, i don't know what to tell ya. maybe enjoy whatever corner of the game you are looking at at the time i guess. you'll definitely notice the blurry parts of it but i'd be more worried about not being able to see the whole screen at once in the first place..
I play on graphics mode and see no big performance issues so till the game might be patched I’ll just play it in full resolution, this game is just too damn beautiful
From this footage I can't see a difference in image quality, but I can definitely see the difference in framerate. The left side of the screen just gives me a headache.
Interestingly enough, the blurriness of the Final Fantasy VII Rebirth demo visuals is not caused by low resolution or by a dynamic resolution range that dips down too much. According to John Linneman, the game runs at 1440p resolution in Performance Mode, and the blurriness is caused by post processing at 1/4 of that resolution. Given how big it is, this seems like a major oversight, so hopefully, something will be done before the game launches later this month. From an Artikel
I have the best OLED on the market. This game does NOT look as good as remake. Period. I know it's a demo but we're very close to release and I don't see how they're going to fix it. Textures look fuzzy and don't pop and glow the way they did in Remake. Am I the only one who sees this?
I also have an oled tv and the pop in is insane I also think remake looked better. I still can't wait to play it but man that pop in is that normal I thought something was wrong with my tv or console
Performance mode looks terrible, but i played the demo in graphics mode and quickly got used to the lower framerate. It's disappointing, for sure, but not a dealbreaker for me. Square Enix can optimize it better if they really tried, especially with upscalers. Hopefully they'll release a patch. I aint waiting for this game to release on PC--way too hyped for it. **EDIT: I did go back into the demo and change a bunch of HDR settings on my TV (a 4K TCL 6 series from 2020), and got the performance mode to look better, to the point where I would play the whole game in that mode for the smooth framerate. However, it shouldn't have to come down to what TV you have or what settings you have for it to look decent.
PSA: This demo's performance mode looks WAY better on a 4k TV than on my 1440p display. I watched my friend use performance mode on his 4k tv and wanted to show him how bad it looked. and to my surprise it looked like not a blurry mess as it does on my 1440p display. I think they are just across the board cutting resolution by 60% or something. So 60% of 4k looks fine but 60% of 1440p looks bad. I think its something like this. I overheard that the game itself from maximlilian Dude looks much better graphically in performance mode than the demo did. Here's hoping they fixed this blurry mess in the game
@@beammeupscottsp7952 yeah thats interesting. My monitor supposedly has an upscaler but it looks terrible on there but only this game others looked fine. Lg gl83a-b but yeah.. theres some difference. On a proper 4k tv performance mode looks fine. I do wonder if its the ps5 not picking up that its connected to a 1440p display and treating it like 1080p and then 60% resing that for performance mode. It looks like a steam deck res or something its awful for 27"
@@Vartazian360 Idk, I’m just going on past experiences with my C3 and S90C. Jedi survivor in performance mode looked like potatoes on my s90c while it actually pretty descent on my C3. I turn up sharpness and the C3 and s90c, the c3 has the ability to make low resolution modes look a lot better. Get a TV than can upscale better is what it comes down too since these studios suck unless it’s first party Sony.
Man that's what I'm saying. Everyone in here is absolutely wigging out. They must be upscaling to 4k or something because in 1080P the game looks very good on either mode.
Word on the street is this is an old build. MaximillianDood said in on of the previous demos he played the performance mode was blurry like this, but in the newer build preview he’s played it much better. Just gotta hope that is accurate
Yeah, that's a huge cope. A mega corporation like Square Enix would have a current build demo ready to go when it's less than 3 weeks until launch. No chance of it being "fixed" either. Square Enix isn't CDPR, they typically don't patch their games after launch. FF16 has received exactly one major patch (not talking about the DLC) and the only thing they did graphics wise was allow us to modify motion blur. Performance mode is still crap in that game almost a year later.
FF7 Rebirth uses UE4, just like FF 7 Remake. I expect the framerate to struggle even more in dense open areas. QM is probably the way to go here, unless you don't have a problem with poor IQ and an unstable framerate. Another thing that's worth mentioning is the aggressive lod management in both modes. There are a lot of objects popping in and out at a short distance. Pretty distracting, if you ask me. This was already present in all gameplay trailers. Btw, as far as I know it's still unclear which engine is used in FF16 (it's not Luminous or UE)..
I’m so happy I found the graphic settings because graphic mode was not it. I’m deeply dissapointed we can’t have best of both worlds with ps5 being that powerful
During exploration and combat this full game still looks like absolute shit in both performance and in graphics mode no matter how good your TV or monitor is. It is a developer issue NOT the consumers issue. Setting your PS5 to 1440p ( If your tv supports doing that) might give it a miniscule bump in visual quality in performance mode but certainly not a fix even in the least. It's on them to fix it with a patch.
This is coming on pc for sure 2 years from now but thats too long. I will play it on ps5 its not that bad if you have a decent 4k tv/monitor. Playing it on performance mode on my sony tv and it doesn’t look bad if i play with the tv settings sharpening and clarity.
Game looks completely awful at 60 fps. So tired of the SQ fanboys coping about it, too. Square Enix is not an indie company. It's a massive billion dollar corporation. Charging $70 for a game that looks like PS3 quality at 60 fps is inexcusable for them. Even Horizon Zero freaken Dawn looked and ran better than this in 2017. Even the super villain Ubisoft can fart out a good looking 60 fps game seemingly every year. Why do FF fans insist on coping for Square so much?
Actually this game scale must be run in 4k/120hz with engine more than UE4, this game will mind blowing than this if they focus on details like GOW ragnarok or other Sony interactive games.
Thanks for the video! I'm waiting for the PC release. I still don't have a ps5 and no way im paying $70 to run a game in semi-4k 30fps. Its 2024 and brand new games struggle to run 30fps 😂🤡
I'm not seeing too much difference. Graphics I can make out few more details more easily, but otherwise nothing. The only time i notice anything major is when you zoomed in and I'm not gonna be zooming in when playing lol.
After 10hours playing in performance mode i decided to try graphics mode, now with 30hours in the game, i cant go back to performance, yayay im also the guy that needs 60fps, BUT HEAR ME OUT, at start you will see sttutering from going down to 30, but HEAR ME OUT, your eyes get used to the 30 fps, and you can barely see a diference, and DAMN this game in graphics mode is way way WAYYY tooo pretty to suffer in the uglyness of perfomance mode, and i need to see Tifa in her all beauty of 4k graphics lol
@@elwingy not really! But did you play the demo? Or you don't wanna get spoiled? It's okay go play the demo then we'll talk and if you can't still make the difference you down really bad Paco👀🤣🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭
No man I play every game on PS5 in performance mode.And I've always been happy.This is the first game I've played in performance mode. Where I actually switch to quality because the performance mode looks so s*****Usually p s five can play games in performance mode and still look beautiful but this I just can't take it it pisses me off there's no excuse.
The image is melting and he's like "I'm glad they optimized it". Compare it to Remake on PS5, and not 16 (different engine entirely), and you'll figure out quickly if they optimized the game.
Either ps5 is just a weak pos or square enix is just terrible with performance modes. Forspokens performance mode was smooth but blurry in a lot of spots. Ff16 i couldnt even play because performance mode is 45fps outisde of combat and very blurry. Im going to have to wait for ps5 pro before i get rebirth or buy a pc. Sony need to stop holding back 3rd party devs to exclusive deals if theyre console is weak asf and cant do what the devs actually want.
The game definitely looks improved over FF7 remake that is clear. It looks really good. I wonder what it would have looked like of they weren't originally trying to make it on the ps4 as well and built it ground up on ps5.
@@holy9781 it doesn't run badly what r you talking about. I'm not trying to cope are you slow? The devs themselves said it was suppose to be on ps4 as well.
Unfortunately, we have to say that today's Square-Enix is not the best when it comes to graphic optimization. better than most other studios, see from software but there could be more. especially since it's unreal 4 and not its own engine. Unfortunately, we have to say that today's Square-Enix is not the best when it comes to graphic optimization. better than most other studios, see from software but there could be more. especially since it's unreal 4 and not its own engine. I would have liked a 45fps mode with VRR. Also disappointing that the mirrors still dont reflect. Maybe it's a stylistic device but it looks strange. There are also some low poly models in the houses. I think this was done more to save time in development and not because the hardware is too bad. There are plenty of other open world games that don't have that. Ray tracing would also be nice to see what it would look like. One can hope that they will bring an update for the PS5Pro and PC when the time comes. at least it runs at a good 60fps. you don't need anything more.
They both look rough.oh no.this is next gen?people keep saying how open the game is...thats what the devs have said,we have not played it stop giving them so much faith
@@xtr.7662 im just saying at least graphic mode in 16 was pretty amazing no cap.ff7 rebirth graphic mode was so chuggy and had way to much lag.im gonna wait
As someone who wishes the game came out on PC to play it at 4K60fps+ with everything max, it doesn't look horrible. It looks fantastic in quality mode (minus some low texture elements in certain areas). It still looks good on performance but the difference is obvious, but I rather sacrifice some graphics for a higher frame rate.
That was my first impression too. On 77" Sony A84K OLED this game in Peformance Mode looks horrible (slightly better in Graphic Mode but still shit). I was shocked how blurry it is. Even downloaded REMAKE to see the difference and my memory didn't fool me - REMAKE looks much better. I'm so frustrated - waited so long ;(
I'm happy it's running at 60FPS at all, FFXVI really dropped the ball there. I for one care more about the higher frame rate then a higher resolution. Great there is the option regardless for people to choose.
No one can make me believe performance mode runs at 1080p. I doubt if it is more than 720p
Completely agree is such a downgrade from the graphics mode it’s crazy
1080p with TAA is blurry as fuck.
@@edimarrodrigrove3377 taa does not make a game look that bad mate. this is upscaled 540p trust me
Kinda baffling since this isnt a huge upgrade from the ps4 version, where the hell is the power of the ps5
@@Darksider087 after last year I believe that nex gen is all about dualsense features. Nothing more
How is 60 fps worse than the first game!? Blows my mind. I want to play in 60 fps, but not looking all fuzzy. The 30 fps looks nice, but it's too jarring to play this way.
@@elrandom71Why are we going backwards? Shouldn't we expect games to look better as technology increases, rather than the other way around?
so true but this industry is obsessed & plauged with prioritizing the wrong things
@@elrandom71The thing is that this graphics are exactly the same as the FF7 remake.
open world vs linear gamr
@@joesiprthis is why I hate open games on console.
I hope performance mode is fixed for release because remake looked beautiful in either mode and this looks awful 1080p blurry
I'm really sure my PS4 games looked sharp even with a 1080i tv, these games looking trash now
Remake was a ps4 game. This is next gen only. 30fps is gonna be the norm going forward.
Maybe. But without me.@@elrandom71
The same in release version.
Calling this game optimised is hilarious.
i think performance mode is 720-1080P upsale to 1440P, it's very blurry
Yeah, i doubt it's even close to 1080p. At least performance is ok.
I’m using the 4K Gamer Pro and it helps some. Not to the level of Graphics mode but it does look better. Hopefully the full game won’t need it. 🙏🏻
It's better then FFXVI but that's not saying much. SE needs to start dedicating some serious $$$$ towards optimizing their games better. I don't care how good your game is, if performance is bad, it drags the experience down. Ragnarok and Forbidden West should be the bare minimum level of fidelity that games are shooting for this deep into the consoles life cycle. Obviously they are running on different engines but it kind of ridiculous to be playing at 720p upscaled in 2024. The PS5 should not be running anything less then 1440p native or 1440p upscaled 4k for performance mode. This goes double for titles that are PS5 exclusives because they only require optimizing that specific hardware.
@@Entreped Forbidden West puts this to shame, both are open world with loads seemingly going on yet HFW looks insane in 40fps VRR mode and still solid in 60FPS mode
@@Zillawillforbiden west barely has that much detail compared to rebirth though it is night and day difference.
I can't understand why they can't tone down the effects and give us a propre resolution and fluidity... It's like prioritizing the toping over the cake
so true but MUH particle effects!!!1!
1:34 "Overall its not too bad"
W H A T?
Yeah it looks like shit
How with a 10x more powerfull console Rebirth looks worth than remake ?
EXACTLY
It's crazy too because they can't even use the excuse that it's being held back by PS4 limitations, this is a PS5 game through and through and it looks worse than tons of PS4 games do
10x? Where tf did you get that from?
They waiting for the ps6 version to make a big deal about it.
I did notice that performance was blurry, but seeing the 2 modes side by side is actually insane. Its like 720p vs 1440p
Why a 40 fps mode is not standart in addition to 30 and 60 is beyond my understanding.
I would love to play the game in native 1440p and 40 fps on my LG OLED TV. FSR upscaling looks so bad...
They don't do 40 frames a second mode because most people don't have a variable refresh rate TV
@@S-420 shame
@@S-420 bro why you need to talk about VRR? 40 fps even without vrr is smother than 30 fps. FPS is different from Refresh Rate
@@SpeeedyHunteeerrrrr most tvs are 60hz. 60/40=1.5 frames. Your screen will be tearing all the time. It's not smooth
@@kingsnaka7592 So? Ratchet and Clank implemented a 40 fps mode if it detects a 120 Hz TV. Otherwise the option is greyed out. IMO this should always be an option.
I don’t know how this is a game built from the ground up for the PS5 yet struggles to run at 60 fps and at a lower resolution than the free final fantasy 7 remake update that came out years ago and ran at 60 fps at 1440p
I really hope they fix how blurry and low res the graphics and textures are in the full release
They didn't
I'm late to the party and am playing FF7 Rebirth right now. I have a 65" 4k Samsung tv. I've tried performance mode and it looks so blurry and faded I couldn't play the game because everything looks washed out. I had to change it to Graphics mode, but when I did there is screen tearing and judder effect. I tried to reduce it through the tv settings and it kind of reduced it somewhat.
Quality mode is miles better than the blur soup that is the performance mode
But it feels like the game is lagging when playing on Graphics mode
people... you likely won't even notice that blurry aspect of performance mode. chill out. if you have a small 4k tv with 1080p(42 inch or so) sitting the recommended distance from the screen, you should barely see a difference unless you do a 4x zoom. if you have a gigantic 65 inch tv and you sit close, i don't know what to tell ya. maybe enjoy whatever corner of the game you are looking at at the time i guess. you'll definitely notice the blurry parts of it but i'd be more worried about not being able to see the whole screen at once in the first place..
I hope there's a graphics plus performance mode patch for ps5 pro...
I play on graphics mode and see no big performance issues so till the game might be patched I’ll just play it in full resolution, this game is just too damn beautiful
It looks great in quality mode, but due to the fast combat, it needs to be played in performance mode.
From this footage I can't see a difference in image quality, but I can definitely see the difference in framerate. The left side of the screen just gives me a headache.
Interestingly enough, the blurriness of the Final Fantasy VII Rebirth demo visuals is not caused by low resolution or by a dynamic resolution range that dips down too much. According to John Linneman, the game runs at 1440p resolution in Performance Mode, and the blurriness is caused by post processing at 1/4 of that resolution. Given how big it is, this seems like a major oversight, so hopefully, something will be done before the game launches later this month.
From an Artikel
Why is post processing at 1/4 needed then? Leave at 1440p/60, what exactly is the point
I have the best OLED on the market. This game does NOT look as good as remake. Period. I know it's a demo but we're very close to release and I don't see how they're going to fix it. Textures look fuzzy and don't pop and glow the way they did in Remake. Am I the only one who sees this?
Same girl, so frustrating
I also have an oled tv and the pop in is insane I also think remake looked better. I still can't wait to play it but man that pop in is that normal I thought something was wrong with my tv or console
Performance mode looks terrible, but i played the demo in graphics mode and quickly got used to the lower framerate. It's disappointing, for sure, but not a dealbreaker for me. Square Enix can optimize it better if they really tried, especially with upscalers. Hopefully they'll release a patch. I aint waiting for this game to release on PC--way too hyped for it.
**EDIT: I did go back into the demo and change a bunch of HDR settings on my TV (a 4K TCL 6 series from 2020), and got the performance mode to look better, to the point where I would play the whole game in that mode for the smooth framerate. However, it shouldn't have to come down to what TV you have or what settings you have for it to look decent.
It's a demo made from a build of Septembre 2023, not the final game
@@saturnalien_5291 Same excuse people used for 16 and guess what it was exactly same for full release
I dont mind 30 fps but it studdards even in cutscenes so it like ughhh m,u have a hard time seeing either way
Performance was better for me
PSA: This demo's performance mode looks WAY better on a 4k TV than on my 1440p display. I watched my friend use performance mode on his 4k tv and wanted to show him how bad it looked. and to my surprise it looked like not a blurry mess as it does on my 1440p display. I think they are just across the board cutting resolution by 60% or something. So 60% of 4k looks fine but 60% of 1440p looks bad. I think its something like this. I overheard that the game itself from maximlilian Dude looks much better graphically in performance mode than the demo did. Here's hoping they fixed this blurry mess in the game
Also it depends on your TV’s upscaler, the C3 is better upscaling/sharpness than my s90c.
@@beammeupscottsp7952 yeah thats interesting. My monitor supposedly has an upscaler but it looks terrible on there but only this game others looked fine. Lg gl83a-b but yeah.. theres some difference. On a proper 4k tv performance mode looks fine. I do wonder if its the ps5 not picking up that its connected to a 1440p display and treating it like 1080p and then 60% resing that for performance mode. It looks like a steam deck res or something its awful for 27"
@@Vartazian360 Idk, I’m just going on past experiences with my C3 and S90C. Jedi survivor in performance mode looked like potatoes on my s90c while it actually pretty descent on my C3. I turn up sharpness and the C3 and s90c, the c3 has the ability to make low resolution modes look a lot better. Get a TV than can upscale better is what it comes down too since these studios suck unless it’s first party Sony.
Never played any of the ff7 games but i liked the demo enough that i decided to preorder it
U need to play remake first tho
1:20 vs 1:25, play with the arrow keys and see the difference....
So sad the 60 frames mode must be attached to a so blurred image.
why they never implement FSR 2.0 with that we should have a more polished image in perfomance mode. lazy square
Dude people talking about performance mode looking bad but I literally can't tell a difference when I pause and look at these side by side shots.
Did you make sure to increase the video quality to 4K? The stairs and the grass on performance look blurry as hell compared to the quality shot.
Man that's what I'm saying. Everyone in here is absolutely wigging out. They must be upscaling to 4k or something because in 1080P the game looks very good on either mode.
Word on the street is this is an old build. MaximillianDood said in on of the previous demos he played the performance mode was blurry like this, but in the newer build preview he’s played it much better. Just gotta hope that is accurate
Yeah, that's a huge cope. A mega corporation like Square Enix would have a current build demo ready to go when it's less than 3 weeks until launch. No chance of it being "fixed" either. Square Enix isn't CDPR, they typically don't patch their games after launch. FF16 has received exactly one major patch (not talking about the DLC) and the only thing they did graphics wise was allow us to modify motion blur. Performance mode is still crap in that game almost a year later.
Believe me when I tell you, never hear from Max in SE games, he will defend them as if his life is on the line. Don’t accept cope
stop motion mode or blurry mode
60fps is always the way to go for action games
Bro, I can't see a difference except for performance mode running better, can anyone tell me what everyone's problem is?
Can we have both 60fps and 4k with PC?
I'll be playing it at 120+ at 4K myself once it finally comes out on PC
Almost a given. Going to wait for it as well. Hopefully we don’t have to wait another year for it to come to Steam. Epic Games Store. 🙄🙄🙄
Exclusive Ps5 only for 3 months. I will wait for the PC version for 4k 120 fps
maybe for ps6 if they release a ps5 remaster version lol
Performance mode reminds me how Jedi survivor looked when it was released. In performance mode the native resoutkioj was like 600p lol
FF7 Rebirth uses UE4, just like FF 7 Remake. I expect the framerate to struggle even more in dense open areas. QM is probably the way to go here, unless you don't have a problem with poor IQ and an unstable framerate. Another thing that's worth mentioning is the aggressive lod management in both modes. There are a lot of objects popping in and out at a short distance. Pretty distracting, if you ask me. This was already present in all gameplay trailers. Btw, as far as I know it's still unclear which engine is used in FF16 (it's not Luminous or UE)..
Play Batman Arkham Knight man
Increase the sharpness on your tv and it will look better
Bruh actually saying FF7 Rebirth is better than FF16 based off a demo, lmao
Right? 🤣
it does imo
@@arceptor We played a different demo.
@@bigdaddynero rebirth at least feels like a proper rpg compared to the DMC lite 16. and itll have minigames! like a proper FF..
I’m so happy I found the graphic settings because graphic mode was not it. I’m deeply dissapointed we can’t have best of both worlds with ps5 being that powerful
Hopefully they port the game to PC efficiently. The textures look bad on rocks n mountains.
During exploration and combat this full game still looks like absolute shit in both performance and in graphics mode no matter how good your TV or monitor is. It is a developer issue NOT the consumers issue. Setting your PS5 to 1440p ( If your tv supports doing that) might give it a miniscule bump in visual quality in performance mode but certainly not a fix even in the least. It's on them to fix it with a patch.
This is coming on pc for sure 2 years from now but thats too long. I will play it on ps5 its not that bad if you have a decent 4k tv/monitor. Playing it on performance mode on my sony tv and it doesn’t look bad if i play with the tv settings sharpening and clarity.
Game looks completely awful at 60 fps. So tired of the SQ fanboys coping about it, too. Square Enix is not an indie company. It's a massive billion dollar corporation. Charging $70 for a game that looks like PS3 quality at 60 fps is inexcusable for them. Even Horizon Zero freaken Dawn looked and ran better than this in 2017. Even the super villain Ubisoft can fart out a good looking 60 fps game seemingly every year. Why do FF fans insist on coping for Square so much?
....do....do you even know what ps3 games look like?
will wait to play this on PC with better FPS
Actually this game scale must be run in 4k/120hz with engine more than UE4, this game will mind blowing than this if they focus on details like GOW ragnarok or other Sony interactive games.
Do you think in the combat the camera setting is too zoom out? , i saw many comments on reddit. Even they did setting the camera but it still weird.😢
Do you think the game is worth buying??
It might come with vrr and we can get graphics mode with 40 fps
It won't because SE is lazy but this mode would be the best.
Thanks for the video! I'm waiting for the PC release. I still don't have a ps5 and no way im paying $70 to run a game in semi-4k 30fps. Its 2024 and brand new games struggle to run 30fps 😂🤡
I'm not seeing too much difference. Graphics I can make out few more details more easily, but otherwise nothing. The only time i notice anything major is when you zoomed in and I'm not gonna be zooming in when playing lol.
it just me or cloud eyes look so weird
After 10hours playing in performance mode i decided to try graphics mode, now with 30hours in the game, i cant go back to performance, yayay im also the guy that needs 60fps, BUT HEAR ME OUT, at start you will see sttutering from going down to 30, but HEAR ME OUT, your eyes get used to the 30 fps, and you can barely see a diference, and DAMN this game in graphics mode is way way WAYYY tooo pretty to suffer in the uglyness of perfomance mode, and i need to see Tifa in her all beauty of 4k graphics lol
For me it’s the opposite the stuttering is so ugly I am forced to play performance 😭
This game graphic is nowhere near the level of ff7 remake. Wtf happened
your rose tinted glasses are malfunctioning
@@elwingy not really! But did you play the demo? Or you don't wanna get spoiled? It's okay go play the demo then we'll talk and if you can't still make the difference you down really bad Paco👀🤣🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭
@@wasupman777 Yes I played the demo. And intergrade is also installed on my PS5. Rebirth is improved graphically. That is a fact.
They transferred 7 remake to unreal engine. Gives this new game a generic anime look imo. I'm with ya I think ps5 7 looks better.
@@elwingy you sicko
Where is 40 fps mode the best mode ever! Cause 60 fps is too bloory.
Looks quite good, my issue is the lack of foliage interaction, this is the ps5!
u guys should understand that performance mode is focus on fps not resolution.
No man I play every game on PS5 in performance mode.And I've always been happy.This is the first game I've played in performance mode. Where I actually switch to quality because the performance mode looks so s*****Usually p s five can play games in performance mode and still look beautiful but this I just can't take it it pisses me off there's no excuse.
就算能跑1440p，光影對比還是太差了
The image is melting and he's like "I'm glad they optimized it". Compare it to Remake on PS5, and not 16 (different engine entirely), and you'll figure out quickly if they optimized the game.
perf. mode still looks good. I wouldnt cry if they didnt ''fix'' it
Either ps5 is just a weak pos or square enix is just terrible with performance modes. Forspokens performance mode was smooth but blurry in a lot of spots. Ff16 i couldnt even play because performance mode is 45fps outisde of combat and very blurry. Im going to have to wait for ps5 pro before i get rebirth or buy a pc. Sony need to stop holding back 3rd party devs to exclusive deals if theyre console is weak asf and cant do what the devs actually want.
what a joke, not gonna buy it day 1 anymore, just gotta mute twitter for spoilers for the next few months...
Performance is better
Like i said. The next 540p fsr shit.
There are ps2 era low res textures even in graphics mode.
The game definitely looks improved over FF7 remake that is clear. It looks really good. I wonder what it would have looked like of they weren't originally trying to make it on the ps4 as well and built it ground up on ps5.
It was made for the ps5,stop making up cope mechanism to why it runs like shit
@@holy9781 it doesn't run badly what r you talking about. I'm not trying to cope are you slow? The devs themselves said it was suppose to be on ps4 as well.
@@thesonofman777 when
@@thesonofman777🧢
@@T2Judgementday-yb2jz go look at the first trailer reveal it was under both ps4 and ps5.
Unfortunately, we have to say that today's Square-Enix is not the best when it comes to graphic optimization. better than most other studios, see from software but there could be more. especially since it's unreal 4 and not its own engine.
Unfortunately, we have to say that today's Square-Enix is not the best when it comes to graphic optimization. better than most other studios, see from software but there could be more. especially since it's unreal 4 and not its own engine.
I would have liked a 45fps mode with VRR.
Also disappointing that the mirrors still dont reflect. Maybe it's a stylistic device but it looks strange. There are also some low poly models in the houses.
I think this was done more to save time in development and not because the hardware is too bad. There are plenty of other open world games that don't have that.
Ray tracing would also be nice to see what it would look like.
One can hope that they will bring an update for the PS5Pro and PC when the time comes.
at least it runs at a good 60fps. you don't need anything more.
Why tf did you repeat your first paragraph twice? 😂
Cope
They both look rough.oh no.this is next gen?people keep saying how open the game is...thats what the devs have said,we have not played it stop giving them so much faith
Well at least it runs way better than ff16
Graphics mode ran perfect on ps5.not Studdard at 30 fps.graphics mode runs horrible in rebirth
@@holy9781 it didnt watch the ff16 video performance mode was wildly unstable quality mode drops in a few areas as well
@@xtr.7662 im just saying at least graphic mode in 16 was pretty amazing no cap.ff7 rebirth graphic mode was so chuggy and had way to much lag.im gonna wait
@@holy9781 it definitely wasnt ff7 looks quite a bit better on quality mode resolution in both modes in ff16 was quite low
@@holy9781 but graphics wise yea ff16 has the better lighting and shadows
It looks on par with the first part, which is good for continuity.
better than starfield 😆
I was going to buy the PS5 just to play this game but I think for now I'm going to wait because it looks horrible
As someone who wishes the game came out on PC to play it at 4K60fps+ with everything max, it doesn't look horrible. It looks fantastic in quality mode (minus some low texture elements in certain areas). It still looks good on performance but the difference is obvious, but I rather sacrifice some graphics for a higher frame rate.
performance mode is like ps3 game
That was my first impression too. On 77" Sony A84K OLED this game in Peformance Mode looks horrible (slightly better in Graphic Mode but still shit). I was shocked how blurry it is. Even downloaded REMAKE to see the difference and my memory didn't fool me - REMAKE looks much better. I'm so frustrated - waited so long ;(
Ps3 games aren't that detailed, stop fooling yourself lol
it looks the same lol 😂
It does, ppl just like complaining and trying to sound smart
@@luisacevedo2095 I bet
Game looks horrible on performance mode.
👋👏✌️
I'm happy it's running at 60FPS at all, FFXVI really dropped the ball there. I for one care more about the higher frame rate then a higher resolution. Great there is the option regardless for people to choose.
You like blurry grapich? good if it's at 1440p but for 720p or 1080p I prefer to choose 4k 30fps if the game doesn't run at 1440p.
@@fawwazthalibthalib7180 I value frame rate more than resolution yes.
@@JKSmith-qs2ii It's a locked 60 fps under every combat encounter, in FF16.
FF16 is suck
Consoles are a joke 😂😂
Meanwhile your pc with 750ti...
Enjoy playing GTA 6 in 2038 🤣🤣🤣
Pcs are actually big jokes@@MichaelM28
@@MichaelM28 with shitty port of course
I have a high end pc and ps5 I’m still gonna play on ps5 it might don’t come to pc for awhile 🤦🏽♂️