World’s 1st CVVD Engine Technology: Improving Fuel efficiency, Performance while Reducing Emissions

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 238

  • @michaelan9688
    @michaelan9688 5 років тому +74

    4% efficiency boost with 5% power gain doesn't sound like much, but as long as it is as reliable as before, then I'll take it!

    • @LambdaWave84
      @LambdaWave84 5 років тому +1

      It will not.

    • @Rheisler1475
      @Rheisler1475 5 років тому

      check out Mazda Skyactiv X, 20-30% effiency boost and looking to be 180-90 Hp

    • @aristidgrossmann7223
      @aristidgrossmann7223 4 роки тому +16

      4 or 5 percent is a massive improvement for a heat engine.
      Even increasing the efficiency of the engine by about 0.5% would be huge.
      Especially nowadays, where combustion engines have met their limits.

    • @martintaper7997
      @martintaper7997 4 роки тому +6

      It's significant, and most all engine design improvements are incremental. If single figure percentage gains were left behind, we'd still be driving Model T Fords.

    • @qpSubZeroqp
      @qpSubZeroqp 4 роки тому

      @@LambdaWave84 why not?

  • @CARirangKR
    @CARirangKR 5 років тому +26

    기존 기술인 CVVT(언제여느냐)와 CVVL(얼마나여느냐) 기술을 합쳐서 사용하면, 기간(듀레이션)을 조절할 수 있습니다.
    CVVT(언제여느냐)로 열리는 시작점을 정하고, CVVL(얼마나여느냐)의 하이캠을 사용하는 경우 열리는 기간이 늘어나고, 로우캠을 사용하는 경우 열리는 기간이 단축됩니다.
    단, 하이캠을 사용하는 경우 열리는 기간이 길어지면서 흡기 밸브가 많이 열리고, 로우캠을 사용하는 경우 열리는 기간이 단축되면서 흡기 밸브가 적게 열리게 됩니다.
    그래서 흡기밸브를 짧은기간 열게되면 적게 열리게되고, 열린면적이 적어지게 되면 저항이 강해져서 공기가 원하는 만큼 들어가지 못하는 단점이 발생하게되는거죠.
    바로 이 단점을 해결하기 위해서 CVVD를 개발한 것입니다.
    즉, 흡기밸브를 '짧은 기간' 열더라도 "많이" 열고 싶은거죠.

    • @freefalling5158
      @freefalling5158 5 років тому

      지금으로선 마즈다 스카이액티브x vs 나머지 인듯하내요. 니싼, 현대, 토요타의 다이내믹엔진등 이름만다르지 원리는 같은 기술이라

  • @nicknamehuri
    @nicknamehuri 5 років тому +54

    "이건... 미쳤다..."라는 생각이 절로 떠오릅니다.
    어떻게 이런걸 만들 생각을 했나요...?
    실제 내구성이 어떨지 궁금하지만, 그것을 떠나 단순해보이는 편심운동으로 진각/지각을 맞춘다는 그 아이디어가 대단합니다.
    양산은 또 어떻게 이루었나요... 그 과정도 힘들었을건데요...
    엔지니어분들께 경의를 표합니다...

    • @Triumph32123
      @Triumph32123 5 років тому +1

      nicknamehuri -이상 현대차 직원이였습니다.

    • @디붕
      @디붕 5 років тому +18

      @@Triumph32123 아니 국가 경쟁력을 올리는 기술개발을 이루어도 이딴식으로 베베꼬여서 어떻게 살아가냐 ㅋㅋ
      칭찬해줄건 칭찬하자
      이상 현재차 직원이었습니다??
      니는 국가나 사회에 도움될만한 행동을 하는거나 있냐?

    • @Triumph32123
      @Triumph32123 5 років тому +1

      핵융합발전소 -이상 사회주의자였습니다.

    • @user-ju2qk1ec6f
      @user-ju2qk1ec6f 5 років тому +5

      @@Triumph32123 하....사회주의란 뜻도 모르면서

    • @freefalling5158
      @freefalling5158 5 років тому

      까내리는건 절대아닌데, 토요타의 다이내믹 포스엔진하고 니싼 VC-Turbo 등등 이미 있는기술이긴함. 작동 방식은 살짝 다를지몰라도

  • @Reddot_AUTO
    @Reddot_AUTO 5 років тому +57

    듀레이션을 양정변화없이 가변하는 메커니즘이라니... 역시 4절링크는 기구학 끝판왕이네요. 이런 어려운 메커니즘을 구현해내고 또 양산화하기까지 얼마나 어려운 난관이 많았을지... 현차 연구원분들의 성과를 끝까지 응원합니다.

  • @권기남-t9v
    @권기남-t9v 5 років тому +8

    평소 밸브트레인에 관심이 많아
    여러 기업들의 밸브트레인 방향성들이
    리프트 가변시스템 이후 더 혁신적인 변화없이 내연기관 개발이 끝나겠구나 라는 생각을 하던중
    듀레이션을 가변제어하여
    밸브 오버랩 뿐이 아닌 가솔린 내연기관 사이클의 모든 장점을 능동적으로 구현하는 가변 시스템을
    우리나라 우리기업에서 개발해냇다는 점에 감탄스러울 따름입니다.
    저 밸브트레인을 개발하기까지 힘쓴 모든분들에게 존경을 표합니다.

  • @ericb.4358
    @ericb.4358 4 роки тому +5

    Hyundai needs CVVD technology in ALL of their engines, and ASAP.

  • @mistermaniac6936
    @mistermaniac6936 5 років тому +12

    Better CGI than most MCU films

    • @poyo3582
      @poyo3582 5 років тому

      Maybe its cause the chi is in dark room with little lighting and the colors arnt vibrant

  • @DhiegoRodrigues
    @DhiegoRodrigues 4 роки тому +5

    more power to Korea and Hyundai, great project

  • @돈키호테-f1t
    @돈키호테-f1t 5 років тому +9

    특허 획득해서 로얄티 엄청 받았으면
    좋겠습니다
    현대차 욕먹으면서도 끝까지
    연구에 매진하신 연구원들에게
    국민의 한사람으로서 감사드립니다
    더욱새로운 친환경 차만들어주시고
    대한민국의 기술을 전세계에 널리
    퍼터리고 무궁한 발전이있기늘 기대해봅니다

  • @theprices417
    @theprices417 5 років тому +3

    This technology is an interim measure for those countries without hydrogen technology. With a modern engine, a 5% gain is awesome and shows how close the internal combustion engine is to achieving its last gasp.

  • @johnpearson492
    @johnpearson492 3 роки тому +2

    Looks like a variant of the Rover K series with variable valve duration first put into production in the 90s. Most notably was the engine in the S1 Lotus Elise.

    • @sylvainguichaoua7122
      @sylvainguichaoua7122 3 роки тому

      I agree, quite bold for them to claim they are the first to make a continuously variable valve duration actuation

  • @youngyuun
    @youngyuun 5 років тому +5

    영상하나 끝내주게 멋지네

  • @Darkdrippingrice1223
    @Darkdrippingrice1223 5 років тому +4

    광고도 잘만들었음 캬 연구진들도 최고

  • @미니무르-f6m
    @미니무르-f6m 5 років тому +11

    현대가 일 냈네요.
    감탄입니다.

  • @유미-abc
    @유미-abc 4 місяці тому +1

    지린다 이게 Dn8 1.6 터보에 달려있는거죠?

  • @atkatk9790
    @atkatk9790 5 років тому +7

    how beutiful is this 😍💖

  • @saauuzza
    @saauuzza 5 років тому +11

    VTEC kicked in yo

  • @danb37
    @danb37 4 роки тому +1

    Put it in a V8 3.2L twin turbo
    Thank you Hyundai engineers for an all mechanical design. I will buy one used of course just as soon as one hits about 100,000 miles

  • @reinhardtmaritz7654
    @reinhardtmaritz7654 5 років тому +6

    There’s always a sacrifice. Increase the efficiency. Decrease the reliability.

  • @charleylee3863
    @charleylee3863 5 років тому +8

    It's unbelievable.

  • @brettgiles1496
    @brettgiles1496 4 роки тому +1

    If it’s reliable than that’s awesome. Cvvd, VVT, now they just need VVL w/ a rocker arm and cam setup like Honda’s VTEC, since a sliding VVL setup like VW/Audi won’t work with their cvvd setup. VVL, VVT, And Duration with a good turbo setup and direct injection would be legendary.

  • @la_micka8697
    @la_micka8697 5 років тому +2

    Cool video

  • @dheeradjlachman9658
    @dheeradjlachman9658 5 років тому +2

    That's sounds good Hyundai 👍

  • @TechTrader108
    @TechTrader108 5 років тому +10

    The more the complexities the more unreliable the engine gets.....Wishing Hyundai the very best to pull this one off..... Without reliability issues...

    • @TheBikemaster94
      @TheBikemaster94 5 років тому +2

      When vtec first came out, I'm sure alot of peeps felt the same way but it has proven to be a very reliable system so I think this new Variable Duration tech will also become a trusted system .
      Back in the mid 70s Big block v8s struggled to get 200hp, now with modern tech we see that with 4 cyl engines

    • @sanisidrocr
      @sanisidrocr 4 роки тому

      It likely will be fairly reliable , watch this ua-cam.com/video/uhsgdwUX1-w/v-deo.html

  • @RulgertGhostalker
    @RulgertGhostalker 2 роки тому

    i am working on popularizeing the ultimate ICE downsizing *Concept* ; yup, i doubt you guessed it, a *Transverse* Inline Six production 2-seat ECO/SPORT.
    1,200 pound aluminum uni-body, with a 5 gallon full tank, and a Mid-Engine 70mm bore x 44mm stroke, ( 80mm connecting rods ), 24-valve *One Litter Inline Six* that red lines over 12Krpm, using DOHC CVVD and VVT to harvest tuned pipe boost pressures, ( at valve overlap ) of around 6 psi peak, across the engine's entire operating range for 78 pound feet of torque and 165 HP ( 7.27 #/ HP ) ... 2:1 into a multi-disk wet clutch, into a behind the engine 5-speed manual electronic shifting trans-axle ... the Acceleration of Supper Cars, but with a reasonable 137 MPH ( 220Kph ) top speed, and MPG that would be tough to top by some economy cars....
    with high quality brake components, stainless steel brake lines, proximity sensors, and good seat belts ( averting any need of air bags )
    +
    Light Rack and pinion Steering ( 1,200 pound mid engine )
    +
    Hydraulic Multi-Disk Wet Clutch
    +
    Manual Electronic Shift 5-Speed
    +
    TBW, to that engine = a real driver's car, where if even a small percentage of adrenalin junkies got that, instead of a heavy high HP equivalent, it would really help..

  • @CSLFiero
    @CSLFiero 4 роки тому +5

    Baffling straightforward mechanical operation that begs the question.. how much r&d are the other car companies really doing that Hyundai crossed into this first?

  • @dougn2350
    @dougn2350 4 роки тому

    Is this camshaft in the 2.5 smartstream too?

  • @evgenygrigorovv
    @evgenygrigorovv 5 років тому +3

    Proud of technology 20-30 years ago - a dubious pleasure. Honda -VTEC, BMW -VANOS, Valvetronic it was so long ago, but at Hyundai only in 2019.

    • @suny4237
      @suny4237 5 років тому +2

      you should reasearch about its mechanism.. :) its actually very innovative and hard to archieve tech
      mercedes wanted hyundais 1.6 - 2.0 engine so bad but hyundai declined them, so they got the renault-nissan engine for their c class which is also based on hyundai-rikardo's predecessor engine. now they will get more headache with this engine LOL.
      im in industry for 8 years and every ppl ive known in the industry(mostly B2B) acknowledge them as one of industry leadears including mercedes, toyota and GM. i think they alrdy proved themselves. their cars are proven reliable. just open one of recent hyundai-kia cars hood, its just beautifully layed out. so simple and straightfoward compared to most of german's abomination.
      but still its conservative nature of car market (especially U.S. market) make an innovation much less effective.wonder why honda were so stubborn to keep 5 speed missions for their cars not many years ago... (because they sell nevertheless :(( )
      toyota-lexus literally have no true sports car lineup except for the supra which is developed by bmw...
      you don't want to buy the vtec engine with SOHC in 2019 bro...

    • @blessed7fold
      @blessed7fold 4 роки тому

      sun y Can you provide some links to articles that backup what you're saying about Mercedes buying their engines from Nissan?

  • @BobbyAngmalaysia
    @BobbyAngmalaysia 5 років тому +20

    Koenigsegg freevalve is expensive to manufacture. Technology like these are nothing new, its just cost and reliability prohibiting them. Everybody knows if the engine bay can be made "variable everything", we can achieve great efficiency and power. Alfa romeo invented variable valve timing, honda made it affordable and reliable, then it became continuously variable with electronics (instead of fixed at certain rpm with two sets of cam lobes being pushed in and out at certain rpm. Then we have variable turbo geometry, which changes the turbine's compression rate, then nissan did the crazy variable displacement engine which changes the crankshaft and conrod's angle to change the stroke of the piston, absolutely bonkers, and now hyundai's variable valve duration, which isnt just timing of when it open or close, but how much it opens or closes can be adjusted, a big breakthrough instead of just two cam profiles to choose from. Mazda's innovation is crazier than this the HCCX is wilder, costs lesser, cleverer, and saves way more fuel while produces much more power. The breakthrough is how fuel burns, not how lean the air fuel mixture can be at times. So far, HCCX seems to be the most promising, using spontaneous honogenous combustion to create diesel like burn rate and efficiency. But just imagine if all these technology comes together in one engine. Mad mad achievements. But costly and probably not reliable.

    • @tedkim4020
      @tedkim4020 5 років тому +3

      So show us what you've got, not just your mouth, but your actual ability to build an such a new engine!

    • @christianabraham217
      @christianabraham217 5 років тому +1

      Yes bobby a mass collaboration where car makers contribute proprietary technologies towards a 2 litre unit to be used in all of their cars would be the way to go. Much needed for our dying world.

    • @blessed7fold
      @blessed7fold 4 роки тому

      Bobby Ang Very interesting.

  • @smartkid1201
    @smartkid1201 3 роки тому +1

    All of Hyundai's engines should be both GDI and MPI.

  • @LuqmanHM
    @LuqmanHM 5 років тому +1

    Hope this engine wont get on fire like the previous one

    • @michaellawrence3085
      @michaellawrence3085 5 років тому +1

      Do your research. That was an American factory employee and quality control lack of proper work skills that caused that. Not the engine.

  • @topiecful
    @topiecful 5 років тому +5

    드디어 신형 엔진이다 하 갖즈아ㅏㅏ

  • @도널드트럼프-u8c
    @도널드트럼프-u8c 5 років тому +6

    여기에 직분사 간접분사 합치면 되겠네요

  • @HelloKoto
    @HelloKoto 5 років тому +3

    Hyundai, congratulations! You invented VANOS + Valvetronic or VTEC (developed by BMW and Honda 20-30 years ago)

  • @HUMBL3B3AST
    @HUMBL3B3AST 5 років тому +3

    Thanks Honda for VTEC.

    • @JohnLee-db9zt
      @JohnLee-db9zt 3 роки тому

      Actually Italians came up with it first. Alpha Romero I believe.

  • @DanDeGaston
    @DanDeGaston 4 роки тому

    Quick Video idea, can you compare the Efficiency and CO2 expense of driving a plug-in hybrid vs driving a pure EV.
    I feel like outside of the loss in horsepower and acceleration, the plug-in EV seems to be the best option for most non-apartment living situations.

    • @DanDeGaston
      @DanDeGaston 4 роки тому

      *You don't need to do a video, I was just doing back of the napkin math and using your previous EV vs ICE video and it appeared that I could have all the range and roadtripping ease of an ICE, while using Solar power collected during the day to power my car approx 355/365 days a year.

  • @anthonyjohn3446
    @anthonyjohn3446 5 років тому +3

    대박..

  • @untitledduck9675
    @untitledduck9675 4 роки тому

    how many moving parts

  • @psions555
    @psions555 5 років тому +3

    So this thing could essentially switch to being like a miller or Atkinson cycle motor on the fly?

  • @sideleyOriginal
    @sideleyOriginal 4 роки тому

    The future for 4 stroke internal comb engine valve actuator is solenoid : no power loss, no friction, no more gear nor chain no belt...Electronically controlled valves will stand out.

    • @JohnLee-db9zt
      @JohnLee-db9zt 3 роки тому

      At what cost, efficiency, and reliability? There’s a reason solenoid based valve actuator like FreeValve hasn’t seen popularity.

    • @sideleyOriginal
      @sideleyOriginal 3 роки тому

      @@JohnLee-db9zt cost: depends on the production scale level. intrinsically, it does not require costly components other than purpose designed electronics to command solenoid. Reliability: it is expected to be more reliable, having less moving parts and less friction.

    • @JohnLee-db9zt
      @JohnLee-db9zt 3 роки тому

      @@sideleyOriginal You can sit there and matherbate all you want. Fact is no one has brought it to production. What do you know about the actual cost of putting together a reliable solenoid valve system for production on mass produced car? Zero.

  • @gtgodbear6320
    @gtgodbear6320 4 роки тому

    That should be fun to tune

  • @읨-l2i
    @읨-l2i Рік тому +1

    현대 내연기관 기술의 마지막 불꽃

  • @이상호-w4i
    @이상호-w4i 5 років тому

    마지막 쏘나타 등장장면.ㅋㅋㅋ 영화한장면처럼 멋잇네요

  • @VfRuckus
    @VfRuckus 4 роки тому

    This must be Korea only since the inline 4 the US 2020 Sonata has an 8 speed transmission, not the CVVD.

    • @dougn2350
      @dougn2350 4 роки тому

      You're joking... I hope.

    • @VfRuckus
      @VfRuckus 4 роки тому

      @@dougn2350 Yeah I misunderstood, but from what I understand it's the 1.6L Turbo in Kia K5 and Sonata Limited edition. Which still sucks cause it's still a 4 cylinder direct injection turbo. Sad.

  • @ambush1242
    @ambush1242 5 років тому +4

    Neat concept, but need to see the fatigue cycle results.

    • @jinxtacy
      @jinxtacy 5 років тому +1

      It's almost as if they create cars to be disposable now.

  • @anotae
    @anotae 5 років тому +9

    I hope those engines don't need to top up 1L of oil every 3.000km like my previous Hyundai. Reason I get rid of them.

  • @lowlanz
    @lowlanz 5 років тому

    궁금한게 어떤때 오래열고 어떤때 조금 여는지 설명해주실분?

  • @Questchaun
    @Questchaun 5 років тому +3

    Neat.

  • @dJ스쿠터매니악
    @dJ스쿠터매니악 5 років тому

    그래서 언제부터 판매하는거죠??

  • @alexfprestes02
    @alexfprestes02 3 роки тому

    now bring to Brazil. Fast!

  • @eeelssl
    @eeelssl 4 роки тому +1

    nice music

  • @댕래
    @댕래 5 років тому +1

    식스시그마 정규분포를이용한 품질개선 표현 아주 훌륭합니다.

    • @댕래
      @댕래 5 років тому

      pp0000 그럼 신개념은 뭔데요? 저기 나타나있는 정규분포는 뭔가요?

    • @5unkist
      @5unkist 5 років тому

      정규분포가 아니고 벨브 타이밍 나타넨 그래프 아니에요??

  • @wers90928ify
    @wers90928ify 5 років тому

    이엔진은 몇만에 깨지나요????

  • @mccanlessdesign
    @mccanlessdesign 5 років тому

    So - it's a hub motor (@ 0:51)? Two or four?

    • @HJJDJSGH
      @HJJDJSGH 5 років тому

      It's just a visual effect.
      The connection has a transmission.

  • @youtubetv1588
    @youtubetv1588 5 років тому

    At least there’s a 10 year warranty on it

  • @WhataThyme
    @WhataThyme 4 роки тому

    I'm starting to think that fire engines in the future are gonna be stacked cylinders. As in, piston meets piston head and the compression gets crazy-weird with maths done by a mini super computer.

  • @expert0509
    @expert0509 5 років тому +8

    현대 응원합니다
    단.리콜할거 있으면 좀 잘 합시다

  • @banaz5018
    @banaz5018 5 років тому +2

    Many vlog said 2.0 not impressed all only wait for 1.6 turbo

  • @olivierolivier6360
    @olivierolivier6360 5 років тому

    Good but i don't think v5 % is enough...prefer hybride...or hydrog

    • @norbertnagy5514
      @norbertnagy5514 7 місяців тому

      5% is pretty huge, because we are at a point where we can only incrase small percentages in aan ice engine. Seems small, but with time, the savings will start to be noticable

  • @CeeOmega
    @CeeOmega 5 років тому +5

    This is turning into Miller cycle. Probably what Mazda already did with its SkyActive G engines.

  • @haideribrahim7261
    @haideribrahim7261 5 років тому

    we want a dohc 16v engines

  • @boongboongboong
    @boongboongboong 5 років тому +7

    연속 가변 밸브 듀레이션이라...

  • @MegaPolarbear22
    @MegaPolarbear22 5 років тому +14

    So basically more expensive to repair.

    • @adrynnovak3648
      @adrynnovak3648 5 років тому +4

      exactly my thought

    • @adrynnovak3648
      @adrynnovak3648 5 років тому +2

      @Tristan Han yeah, i'll stick with my 2.5 L Direct Injection 4JA1 diesel engine then

    • @MegaPolarbear22
      @MegaPolarbear22 5 років тому

      @Tristan Han why

    • @adrynnovak3648
      @adrynnovak3648 5 років тому

      @Tristan Han no i dont ;)

    • @yannikavadas1490
      @yannikavadas1490 5 років тому +1

      @Angry Millennial. All these types of motors are disposable & not repairable units. The combustion engine is coming to an end at its most efficient before electric propulsion seriously kicks in. Unrelated, something similar happened with the shift from Analogue to Digital technology mainstream.😐

  • @ralfdeckers1703
    @ralfdeckers1703 4 роки тому

    BMW Valvetronic is full Variable and 20 years old

  • @opener2869
    @opener2869 4 роки тому

    What about carbon deposits on the intake valves in the T-GDI engines? For example, i have 2019 i30 with this engine. What i should do in order to protect my intake valves from this?

  • @DashCamSerbia
    @DashCamSerbia 5 років тому

    Cool.

  • @Antimortem
    @Antimortem 2 роки тому

    ❤️hyundai

  • @elegy57
    @elegy57 5 років тому

    브이텍이랑 비슷한듯 하네요
    다른점이 뭔지 설명해주실 분?

    • @shaind
      @shaind 5 років тому +2

      VTEC : 캠축을 밀어서 몇가지 서로 다른 캠 프로파일을 적용해서 몇가지 밸브 개폐 기간을 선택할 수 있음.
      CVVD : 캠축의 회전속도를 변화시켜서 밸브 개폐 기간을 연속적으로 변화시킬 수 있음.

    • @이대환-b5t
      @이대환-b5t 4 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/7fmwh3Hon_A/v-deo.html CVVD의 설명입니다. VTEC은 CVVL의 설명을 참고하시면 됩니다.

  • @andreim841
    @andreim841 5 років тому +1

    They should stop fucking about and get cranking on the kona ev production since the waiting list is about a year...

  • @fryncyaryorvjink2140
    @fryncyaryorvjink2140 5 років тому +3

    Why not just do electric valves?

    • @mudargamer
      @mudargamer 5 років тому

      Just like your mom idiot

    • @deltariuns2315
      @deltariuns2315 5 років тому

      Would they be driven by the alternator?

    • @fryncyaryorvjink2140
      @fryncyaryorvjink2140 5 років тому

      @@deltariuns2315 either that or the battery. Koenigsegg does this, they call it freevalve. Maybe its still too expensive or unproven for normal cars

  • @zurgboy07
    @zurgboy07 5 років тому +7

    Can't beat vtec

  • @plasma081
    @plasma081 4 роки тому

    Too late…..!! More than 15 years ago the U.S Pat 8.443.774 do both funtions CVVT+
    CVVD. What is the Innovation with this Patent….?

  • @Busy-B.
    @Busy-B. 4 роки тому +1

    Correct me if im wrong but isnt this a worse version of the königsegg freevalve system?

  • @djhrjeiwhri
    @djhrjeiwhri 5 років тому +1

    Isn'it a valvematic from toyota?

    • @bigsp0073ify
      @bigsp0073ify 5 років тому

      My thoughts exactly. I believe the valvematic system is lift and duration and continuously variable as well.

  • @retherepiaq4379
    @retherepiaq4379 5 років тому

    이 음악 제목 알고 싶다...

  • @conradsealy9603
    @conradsealy9603 5 років тому +1

    Kind of similar to Nissan's VVEL system.

    • @conradsealy9603
      @conradsealy9603 5 років тому

      @screaming chivo why should I trust you? Can you show when Nissan's VVEL system had issues? Post a link.

    • @conradsealy9603
      @conradsealy9603 5 років тому

      @screaming chivo take a look at how much more advanced VVEL is . ua-cam.com/video/v3QxsJRNigs/v-deo.html

    • @conradsealy9603
      @conradsealy9603 5 років тому

      @screaming chivo apart from the video link I posted. Nissan's VVEL proved good enough to win the Dubai 24 hour race in a Z34(370Z) a few years back. Sooooo.....?

    • @conradsealy9603
      @conradsealy9603 5 років тому

      @screaming chivo baseless claims. Post a link.

    • @conradsealy9603
      @conradsealy9603 5 років тому

      @screaming chivo even the GTR has 24 hour race Victories in the Super Tech 24 hour race. Twice. Back to back.

  • @zetohojoin4505
    @zetohojoin4505 5 років тому +2

    I thought electric cars with electric engine will replace CVT's

  • @yanghu3592
    @yanghu3592 5 років тому

    Horsepower?

    • @alpaka6321
      @alpaka6321 5 років тому

      180

    • @yanghu3592
      @yanghu3592 3 роки тому

      @@avalanche15301 the best high rev I4 engines produced around 200 hp in the past. Modern gas savers are on another path. You can keep boosting the engine by turbo, but it doesn't mean the engine is good. From engineer's perspective. Only "bad" engine needs boost. Boost is the last solution of meeting industry requirements.

  • @Justpyro
    @Justpyro 5 років тому

    same as toyota dual vvti ?

  • @MF-vd7tf
    @MF-vd7tf 5 років тому +1

    But the engine American still the best it is like a monster

  • @leejeongtaek
    @leejeongtaek 5 років тому +1

    안 깨지고 무사히 양산되기를 바라겠습니다.

  • @dave_riots
    @dave_riots 5 років тому +1

    Damn, now that's a promising engine.

  • @DonghoRyoo
    @DonghoRyoo 5 років тому +1

    ㅎㄷㄷ

  • @fab4beatlefan
    @fab4beatlefan 5 років тому +1

    if in fact this is a gdi motor, STAY AWAY unless a factory installed catchcan is installed

  • @vadimva1032
    @vadimva1032 5 років тому +1

    Но при етом они ставили натяжитель цепи алюминеевьІй, и короткие юпки в поршней ... Ну что б потребитель чаще приходил за тачкой!

    • @dismay6069
      @dismay6069 5 років тому

      Вадим , они постоянно доробатывают свои моторы , внедряют что то новое и технологичное , думаю этот мотор свои 180 тыс отходит без проблем , а больше турбо и не ходят в наших условиях

    • @vadimva1032
      @vadimva1032 5 років тому

      @@dismay6069 ага! особенно моторы в тачках 2016 го, уже на 70-100 тыс надо менять порши и гильзовать.. такого не было в 2000х!!

    • @Karavai13_live
      @Karavai13_live 5 років тому

      очень часто моторы выходили из строя из за забитых радиаторов охлаждения

    • @dismay6069
      @dismay6069 5 років тому

      @@Karavai13_live Вот опять же все кричат очень частно , но никто не говорит сколько машин продано и какой процент . В 2000х и машин столько одной марки не продавали

  • @LambdaWave84
    @LambdaWave84 5 років тому +16

    Don't present these engines as futuristic technology... They are doomed, the electric motor beats them hands down.

    • @mudargamer
      @mudargamer 5 років тому +3

      I'd rather ruin the environment than die burning

    • @guyindecatur
      @guyindecatur 5 років тому

      @@mudargamer There's more than enough oil to go around. Oil naturally "renews" itself. Capped off, dead wells often renew themselves. No one is really sure *where* oil comes from. Old John D. Rockefeller made-up that ridiculous meme "fossil fuel" in an effort to drive up oil's cost framing oil as a "rare-earth" commodity. Oil doesn't come from dead dinosaurs. Oil is as essential to the "world system" as blood is to your body. Those power lines along highways and internet cables strung across the ocean bottoms are the world system's nerves just like the actual nerves strung up and down your body. The day I see a solar powered, Airbus A380 taking off with a full load of passengers & cargo I'll watch for oil's obituary in my local paper. Until then, the speed limit is just a suggestion. Disclaimer - My dad was a geo-physicist. In the words of Pink Floyd, "thought..........you'd like to know".

    • @LambdaWave84
      @LambdaWave84 5 років тому +1

      @screaming chivo And you really think that newer engines like this one, fully packed with very complicated technology (GDI, twin-scroll turbocharger, PF, EGR, dozens of sensors) are going to last 400000 miles without any problems, like the good old ultra-rustic V8s? 😂
      At work, we have some electric motors that have 30 years and still run almost 24/7...

    • @LambdaWave84
      @LambdaWave84 5 років тому +2

      @@mudargamer Because fossil cars doesn't burn? 😂

    • @jay-uo2bi
      @jay-uo2bi 5 років тому

      @screaming chivo ahahahahahahha. IDIOT. Electric cars are objectively so much more reliable because so much less moving parts. A good electric motor will WAY outlive the very best Korea, Japanese or German ICE engine with no maintenance, because, electric motors have nothing to maintain. If you think electric is not the future, your really not very smart, they are objectively better in every way. Even an idiot like you can understand the simple working of an electric motor but definitely not a ICE engine.

  • @tighematthew
    @tighematthew 5 років тому

    What could go wrong

  • @ianpolo5673
    @ianpolo5673 5 років тому +3

    It looks like how VTEC concept.

  • @GovindRaj-sz9dc
    @GovindRaj-sz9dc 5 років тому

    The car head lamp look like lexus

  • @Martin-xb2rz
    @Martin-xb2rz 4 роки тому

    Make v6 or V8 and I'm in

  • @bfautomotive4267
    @bfautomotive4267 5 років тому +1

    Still very far behind Freevalve

    • @JohnLee-db9zt
      @JohnLee-db9zt 3 роки тому +1

      Who cares? FreeValve is too expensive and inefficient and has questionable reliability to make it popular.

  • @zjones9876
    @zjones9876 4 роки тому

    There's nobody driving the car

  • @댕래
    @댕래 5 років тому +2

    아니 왜 도대체!!!!!!!!
    2.5트림엔 R-MDPS 를 안주나요!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    너 무 하 시 네 들 C타입쓰다가 ABS, 차체흔들림, 핸들위험경고등 한번에 팍 세개 다 떠서 핸들 빡빡해지고 난리났는데 쓰고 싶겠습니까!!!! 근데 또 3.0은 내 분수에 감당이 안돼네ㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠ 그냥 버스타야겠다..

  • @PLATINUM2U
    @PLATINUM2U 5 років тому

    Will it burn like the theta engines🤔🤔🤔😁

    • @michaellawrence3085
      @michaellawrence3085 5 років тому +1

      Only if gm pays another American south employee to sabotage the engine like they did before. Nothing was faulty about those engines except the dumb ass employee in the south that didnt do his or her job properly. Stop being bias.

  • @johnoberle9750
    @johnoberle9750 3 роки тому

    If it’s reliable. All this new crap is nice when it works. When it’s broken I think simplicity.

  • @spk6371
    @spk6371 5 років тому +1

    국내 시장 마루타 체험하겠구만..

    • @alpaka6321
      @alpaka6321 5 років тому

      마루타 ㅇㅈㄹ;

  • @임명수-c4k
    @임명수-c4k 5 років тому

    내연기관.. 없어지지 않나요....이제 대세는 전기차로......

  • @sikoleyley1359
    @sikoleyley1359 5 років тому +7

    just same technology with another name..
    scvt
    dvvt
    vvt
    vvt-i

  • @alexhaws2377
    @alexhaws2377 5 років тому

    World's first? Er... Koenigsegg Freevalve?

  • @zoranzoran4361
    @zoranzoran4361 3 роки тому

    Hat 150 ps benziner ohne 48v auch CVVD TECHNIK???