04 - Table of Laplace Transforms and their Inverses

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 54

  • @rodericksibelius8472
    @rodericksibelius8472 2 роки тому +5

    I have only a 2 year degree and Associate Degree in Electrical/Electronics Engineering Technology and have worked as a Space Laboratory Engineering Technician for Lockheed Aerospace Environmental Testing Laboratory for 17 years, and have worked with all types of Engineers and learned a lot from them, and now I am retired and still learning these advanced conceopts the WHY'S OF PHYSICS / ENGINEERING and Mathematics. Thank You Professor Jason.

  • @gabarayeeyo149
    @gabarayeeyo149 5 років тому +29

    The only teacher I have understand from laplace

  • @jadelion11
    @jadelion11 4 роки тому +13

    Better instruction on the subject than I got 20 years ago in university differential equations. You're an awesome instructor.

  • @vishnuraj6430
    @vishnuraj6430 5 років тому +20

    you are the amazing teacher .. i am the starting of my masters, i was very much scared about my advanced mathematics paper. but you made me easy. thank you so much.....

  • @andreielekes
    @andreielekes 7 років тому +15

    Have not been to a single lecture or practical this year for my bachelors in engineering. Watching all your videos on Laplace transform helped me pass mathematics with 61%. I thank you sir.

    • @Ahsan17687
      @Ahsan17687 5 років тому

      Mr andreideeu for any mini project aur assignment contact please

    • @issuesoflyf6274
      @issuesoflyf6274 5 років тому

      Yes this is awesome. Thanks so much

  • @PandaMordax
    @PandaMordax 5 років тому +3

    The practicality you show up in this concept is literally awesome.

  • @hazemkhaled6552
    @hazemkhaled6552 7 років тому +4

    i don't know how can i thank you enough ,,, ty mr jayson you are an excellent teacher i have been struggling with laplace for too long till i found you

  • @mokganedimatlhare3004
    @mokganedimatlhare3004 4 роки тому +7

    you are the best lecturer....i now understand this more than i did with my lecture in the university...you are phenomenal....thank you MR JASON❤

  • @johnfraser8116
    @johnfraser8116 5 років тому +3

    This guy is a great teacher.

  • @JohnKaigai-u7t
    @JohnKaigai-u7t 10 місяців тому +1

    I've been looking for this type of a teacher.....I've really understood Laplace transforms

  • @yahia3134
    @yahia3134 4 роки тому +7

    I understand from you more than i do from my Professor at the University 😍😅

  • @learnenglish8364
    @learnenglish8364 5 років тому +5

    Thanks so much,I really appreciate your work,I'm so happy that I did understand the Laplace transform ,thanks to you.

  • @dinahk8386
    @dinahk8386 5 років тому +4

    we love you mr.JASON!!!

  • @skwbusaidi
    @skwbusaidi 5 років тому

    The list of the right is not required if the constant in the denominator is missing you can added and devide it outside the inverse laplace
    Inv laplace of 1/(s^2+B^2) =(1/B) Inv laplace of B/(s^2+B^2) =(1/B) cos(Bt)

  • @ezekiel2372
    @ezekiel2372 Рік тому

    this saved me a lot of time ❤❤❤

  • @leolorenzo52raylewis
    @leolorenzo52raylewis 6 років тому +1

    best videos of Laplace out there thank you!!!

  • @robertstack2144
    @robertstack2144 2 роки тому

    Wished you were my teacher for calclus in 1961 in Ann Arbor but you'd be approximately 109 years old now.

  • @lingpeishi5659
    @lingpeishi5659 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you very much sir!!!so clear and useful,i have learn and understand a lot!!!!!

  • @hetsoni5156
    @hetsoni5156 4 роки тому +1

    really man you made laplas soo easy to understand....

  • @mrryan5568
    @mrryan5568 Рік тому +1

    thank you so much you explain math so easily

  • @virgelraitorres2241
    @virgelraitorres2241 3 місяці тому

    For inverse laplace for the third case(L[t^n]), can we put the n! Or any constant in the numerator outside the inverse laplace and turn the numerator of the function into 1, then after getting the inverse simply multiply the original constant to the obtained time domain function?

  • @poppyflorist
    @poppyflorist 3 роки тому +1

    Laplace is an integral!! 😱Mind blown!!!!

  • @Metalhammer1993
    @Metalhammer1993 4 роки тому +4

    nice work on the laplace transforms so far, do you have a similar course on Fourier transforms? I admit i´ll never really use it, us chemists are happy to know our computers handle that (NMR spectroscopy works by fourier transforming the signal if I recall correctly. Well modern NMRs do) but I´m teaching basic maths for Chemists atm and why do we deal with Taylor series? because that´s what our calculator does, and we need to know what happened if the calculator spits out garbage (plus Taylor series are a powerful tool to describe unknown functions) So I can´t on one hand tell the first years "we need to know that, we can´t be complacent just because we have tools that do the heavy lifting for us" and be complacent because I have tools that do the heavy lifting for me^^ It just seems a bit hypocritical.

  • @katrinejensrud537
    @katrinejensrud537 3 роки тому

    you are a fantastic teacher!God bless you

  • @esrasiteketa6146
    @esrasiteketa6146 3 роки тому

    Pressed that Like button on every single one of the videos!

  • @owinowilbur9348
    @owinowilbur9348 4 роки тому

    ✍️ well done
    Clearly elaborated

  • @abinettassew9228
    @abinettassew9228 5 років тому

    love your playlist.you are the best ...... very helpful

  • @IBumpg
    @IBumpg 2 роки тому

    I think the numerator for the inverse of the Laplace for Sin B should be B instead of 1.

  • @CruzoVlogger
    @CruzoVlogger 3 роки тому +1

    Thankyou Sir!

  • @shahriarmim4696
    @shahriarmim4696 5 років тому +4

    2:27 I thought he is telling someone to do own business :P

  • @mariamgaad835
    @mariamgaad835 3 роки тому

    Hot thanks from Egypt ♥️♥️♥️✨

  • @thomasdiprima2629
    @thomasdiprima2629 4 роки тому

    I understand the time domain but never understood what the 's' domain stands for.......is it a definite parameter or just an abstraction?

  • @mikajadelendel9719
    @mikajadelendel9719 7 років тому +2

    Thankyouu so much! I have learned a lot! :")

  • @p.lakshmiprasanna6648
    @p.lakshmiprasanna6648 3 роки тому

    Nice explanation

  • @terrencemadanhi8833
    @terrencemadanhi8833 5 років тому

    Thank U Mr Jason

  • @higenyiemmacollins1949
    @higenyiemmacollins1949 Рік тому

    wow this much easier with you

  • @junicamarbaniang1544
    @junicamarbaniang1544 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much sir

  • @Nitro-kx7ok
    @Nitro-kx7ok 4 роки тому

    Thanku sir 💖🙏

  • @icee562
    @icee562 5 років тому

    3:16

  • @norazmieraayunie1665
    @norazmieraayunie1665 4 роки тому

    thank you sir

  • @abhisheksaha0238
    @abhisheksaha0238 2 роки тому

    Puneet bhai table tennis khelne aoge?

  • @كرار-ف1ر5ث
    @كرار-ف1ر5ث 5 днів тому

    ❤❤❤

  • @learnenglish8364
    @learnenglish8364 5 років тому +1

    Nice nice

  • @happynyaluke7446
    @happynyaluke7446 6 років тому

    thankx alot

  • @shouloluk
    @shouloluk 3 роки тому

    padayon daw siya study oh

  • @akshithbellare7568
    @akshithbellare7568 5 років тому

    Wow the ratio of likes to dislikes is 305!