+LXXXV imperfect doesn't mean can't get right. CGI was still very new in terms of putting scenes and main characters together just right. Look at Avatar - a movie masterpiece almost completely CG. That was accomplished but there are still movies that can't even put together a good 5 minute CG effect together. And that's in 2016. Imagine how it was from 2000-2005. There was a reason movies like Lord of the Rings were considered masterpieces. They were the Michael Jordan's and every one else could only try and imitate.
+Teren Kowatsch It just needed insane amounts of money and people who were completely onboard with going all out with the effects, just look at Jurassic Park's CGI, that still holds up and it was one of the first. Most movies just got lazy with it and ended up with shit.
Matrix fight scene was and still is legendary. Nothing like that was ever attempted before. Get your shit together mojo. You are starting to piss people off
The idea and concept of this scene was and is brilliant. The execution not so much. There are several takes where I don't really see the need to use a CG Keanu instead of the real one and his seemingly wax-modelled face is the most distracting thing there
There are always different ways of doing things. Any attempt can be made to make the final product better or in other words, things can always be done in a better way. Although, this is highly subjective as one person's 'better' is not necessarily the same as the other persons.
Just to be clear, we’re talking about The Matrix *Reloaded.* But yeah, the Agent Smiths just looked like a bunch of balloon people with no weight or effect of gravity. They look too flimsy to be real.
***** Yeah but what I'm saying is that I actually liked all the effects in matrix...To me they were all great, and especially this scene to me was EPIC.
I agree. But it's early 2000's and realistic human CGI really wasn't the best. I do find this a bit ironic though as the CGI scenes during the Burly Brawl were better than the live action wire effects.
Syntax BananaZ what i don't get is why people demand realistic cgi in a non-realistic film in the first place. i mean cgi exists to do stuff that is impossible in real life so why demand realism from something that can't ever be real anyway.
+Mace Dawg in the opening of the video it says these films had massive budgets and shouldn't have settled for poor cgi. spy kids is made by the same people who made sharkboy and lavagirl, so there's literally no standards, bar could not possibly be lower for spy kids
I disagree about The Matrix Reloaded because it was made in 2003 and that CGI was pretty good for that time but if The Matrix Reloaded used that kind of CGI now yes it could be on this list
@@gordonramsay6286 Exactly. Jurassic Park was released in 1992 and their CGI still holds up. Also, CGI isn’t just about how well the graphics are made but how it’s incorporated into the movie. Jurassic Park used animatronics for the close ups so it made the CGI parts relatively seamless. But in the Matrix Reloaded it goes from a few brief realistic fighting moves… to all of a sudden *_everyone_* is a balloon animal and can jump over buildings. Too ambitious.
@@dragon_bro_0 ummm have you seen the amazing bulk? yeah you haven't right? please don't watch it ,birdemic looks like heaven came down to bless you compared to amazing bulk which looks like the deepest layer of hell came to shit all over you
To everyone's reaction to your ridiculous WTF comment.. @Tylor Pewdi would say: ...I DON'T CARE... What I would say: ...WHO GIVES A FLYIN FUCK... What my band mates would say: haha Lolis but ..FUCK YOUR WEBSITE MINES BETTER.. in the back ground look if they got Asains Bitches..??.. -u- What my homies would say: ...I DON'T.. GIVE AH.. !!FUCK!!... What my home girls say: ....YOU LONELY ASS MOTHERFUCKER.... My niggas: ...DAMN DOG QUIT JERKIN YO SHIT YOU STOP THAT RIGHNOW AN FIND YOSELF A REAL GURL... What white Girls say: OMG EWW LOSER.... What white Guys say: ..WOW YOU POOR PATHETIC LOSER.. What black Girls say: ...OMG MY NIGGAH YOU LONELY ASS FUCK... What black Guys say: FUCK OUT MY FACE WITH YOUR GAY SHIT what everyone would probably say Is that no one here gives a FUCK about your adult website we're talking about twilight and you pop out of nowhere and put "Best Adult Site for Hookup - tinyurl. com/o25fvee (all countries) really dude explore the world and find yourself a mate because websites are for losers poor lonely lonely ass losers
GUYS REMEMBER THESE ARE JUST OPINIONS Id say King Kong and Matrix was underrated Considering King Kong was made in 2005 and they didint have the same features and budget to make it better also it had some very very cool scenes and its not supposed to be very realistic it’s supposed to have merciless since it had LITERAL DINOS Id say in my opinion King Kong was pretty good the only bad scenes was the Apatasaurous Stampede
Nah man, when I first saw it I thought to myself, why did they fuck up that scene, cause the rest of the movie looked good. It was terrible in comparison to the rest of the movie.
The entire movie had very impressive CGI, but the stampede scene was just a little off. And it wasn't entirely because of the CGI, it just didn't work with the human interactions! It didn't click, didn't feel like the actors where actually immerged n involved in the scene. The Director, actors, Green screens, the plot and animations and how the scene was shot all had a bit of influence on how it turned out imo. I loved that movie and most it's effects but that whole scene felt a little too greenscreeny!!
New theory on Matrix: Reloaded's Smiths Brawl shitty CGI. As the fight drags on and Smith replicates even further, RAM on the whole system becomes overencumbered and, unable to purge, keeps dropping image quality to being able to keep performance
Actually it shouldn't be on the list at all since they broke their own rule. It was an independent movie not a hollywood blockbuster and had half the budget of the second lowest budget movie in the list, Along Came a Spider.
In the book they’re both, the living vampire dead and the zombie dead-dead. The film infuriated me as it’s my fave book and they just tore it to pieces
@@snachmyweave4806 ah haven't heard that take yet! Didn't know there was a book, everyone just talks about the movie. Were there more parts that you didn't like?or did just that aspect ruin the whole film for you? I mean, the amount of story you can put in a book is sm more yk, one movie could never realistically cover it, so just enjoy it yk.
I will put here The Hobbit - The battle of the 5 armies (War scene). As a Tolkien fan and a LOTR huge fan, i was sooo disappointet on how the cgi fucked up The hobbit trilogy in terms of war, too much cgi, compared to The battle of helms deep or the charge of the rohirrim fot LOTR, The hobbit war scenes suck.
The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies was released in 17 December 2014, the video was uploaded on 15 August 2013, so there is no way The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies could be in there... do you people even watch the release date?
MascaMD Good point. Also The Hobbit is nowhere near as bad in CGI as any of these films, it certainly isn't perfect but it sure as he'll isn't one of the top 10 worst CGI. Weta is one of the best companies for CGI. Although of course some blame goes to everyone involved, I believe the quality was lower due to the short notice on the 2 part film being made into a trilogy.. Azog was one of the last CGI changes in the first Hobbit and he looked absolutely amazing, Dain, elves, Gandalf and some others however did have terrible CG animation.
I read about that, apparently they did try to get actors with makeup to be the monsters, but because of what their infection did to their bodies, they breathe extremely rapidly, and actors that tried to do that ended up hyperventilating, so they decided to just CGI them up. I'm okay with it, since they had Mike Patton do the sounds all of them make.
I actually like the "bad" cgi from the ultraviolet movie. With movies like that where the entire opening is comic drawn style i don't really expect realism, but try to use my fantasy/imagination more. This makes it more enjoyable. If you think more like: "what im watching right now is *only* telling the story and leaves your imagination do the rest" instead of "it happened exactly like this...", then a lot of movies/scenes pass the obstacle of trying to be as realistic as possible. I'm also pretty sure that "Ultraviolet" didnt try to be realistic looking in the first place, if you consider the weird filter which makes the movie look weird and different. They really didnt try to hide it which makes it great in a different way. Now when a movie tries to be super realistic and fails with cgi then that is cringe worthy to me, which is basically 90% of what we have today.
The Matrix? are you kidding me dude? It has the best special effect of any movie ever made. I don't see any movie with even-close effects to the Matrix. considering its more than 10 years old.
+Evil CM Punk No, Jaws III was 1983. It was a practical effect. Early 80's CGI was Tron (1982) and The Last Starfighter (1984), they weren't rendering sharks in 1983... Even bad ones...
The majority of these are fine imo. Leaving out big budget films was a mistake. Their overuse of cgi to the point where they can't make it all look good is the problem with Hollywood right now.
Oh come on number 10? That scene was as legendary as the whole first movie! Mojo is seeing this through hindsight goggles. You gotta look at it from the perspective when it first came out.
The scene was badass and I still think it was one of the coolest things in the movie... But it looked awful. It still does. The Path Of Neo video game looked pretty much the same and it was a PS2 game.
I haven't seen Ultraviolet, but that clip you showed was HIDEOUS. And I'm the kind of guy who can let bad effects slide, but that looked like a PS2 cutscene, and not a very good one. The Scorpion King, well with a film like that, you could defend the CG by saying he's an overworldly demon, so maybe he shouldn't look fully real. It's an excuse, but you could say it. There is nooooo excusing Ultraviolet's motorcycle chase, that's the real world, look real dammit.
well the bike was riding on walls, soo it isn't exactly real world, although when i saw ultraviolet i liked it.. but that was it, not a film worth mentioning thou
LOL Agreed! ...and all they had to do is spend a little more time on it (maybe a month, tops) and it would have been much better! I'm assuming it was finished in a rush to get it out in time for it's release!
Skip Ad Well, the little gremlin-like warrior guys looked pretty good... actually, it just needs some contrast and color saturation work... that alone would make it a lot better looking! Still a great flick! :-)
I remember when I thought the matrix neo agent battle CGI was bad effects but then I realized in a sense that what they were doing was on a level that was technically not in the real world and was bordering on limitations of their digital selves in a digital world so if they looked weird or plastic like or whatever else then its because neo was getting so great that they were actually pushing the limits of their reality and whats possible and becoming digitally altered forms of themselves which then made sense to me and I excused the bad CGI for what was probably proper CGI and possibly even intended for that very reason.
Deceiving list mainly because most of the movies on this list are when CGI was still at that stage where making things realistic was almost impossible. But for its time it was considered good.
Vermalgab Boom the first matrix movie was one of the biggest mistakes... look at the year it was made -_- - Production would have been at around 2000. Go and take a look at pc games from that time.
That's not true at all. The effects in Jurassic park are more impressive than anything on this list, and it was also made several years earlier than all of the movies listed. Like he said, they all have respectable or large budgets, with the exception of Ultraviolet.
Elida Landry the dinosaurs in jurassic park weren't cgi. they were real-life models that they moved around on set. even the "currently-being-eaten" humans were replaced with models. no cgi :3
I think with the Matrix, it's the only movie I know of where you can give the lower quality effects a pass, because it fits with the aspect of the movie taking place inside a computerized universe. It's like, there's so many Agent Smiths in one place, so the computer has a hard time loading them all correctly; so it has to lower the quality to compensate. It's a little like how TRON had some issues in the printing process when the back-lighting was composited in, and certain frames came back over-exposed. But director Steven Lisberger kept the bad frames because it fit with the computer world sparking and bleeping and doing other little things in the background.
Not sure the problem's with the Agent Smiths, but with Gumby Neo. At least, that's what I felt looked wrong with the scene when I first saw it in the theater.
The agents and neo are in the same area, have you played mmo wih a shitty pc, don't mind your character in a over populated area you have to lower the visual quality otherwise you wont even move therefore you char will also look horrible.
George Bell A computer of any kind can have issues with glitches and corrupted encoding if it suddenly creates multiple versions of the same guy. It's like if in a video game, you're shooting down a bunch of random enemies, but one guy can't die because he keeps popping back up again and again and again. Imagine if that glitch was expanded to include an entire room-full of the same character, all with the same code that describes who he is and where he is, and imagine that none of them can die. Now the computer becomes confused as hell, just trying to make sense of the duplicate code required to make dozens of the same guy appear in the same room. I'll admit, I don't know if that explanation is entirely accurate. But I've seen similar things happen in videos about horrible game glitches, and they certainly don't allow the computer to run efficiently, or even work at all. So seeing the Agent Smith clones reduced in resolution still makes some sense, I think. It doesn't excuse the computer animators from doing a low-quality job on the film, but within the film's narrative, there's still an argument to be made for why it still looks like it makes sense.
When these movies came out, I never really thought that any of these effects were necessarily bad. I guess as technology moves on up, so does our standards of what it brings.
That's exactly the problem. Photorealistic human CGI will never look perfect so they had no business putting a Cartoon Neo on the screen for 5 minutes straight. People know the difference between real actor and CGI cartoon and it destroys their suspension of disbelief. Much more so when they go from CGI and instantly cut to the real actors face. "Hey audience, you're not watching a CGI movie, remember" The fight was awesome. but they put waaaaay too much faith in how good their effects looked
Plus the movie was set in virtual reality for the most part, perhaps entirely if you believe some theories. Agent Smith was hacking the system basically, making it behave in ways it wasn't supposed to, and so was Neo. So to me it made perfect sense that things might look a little odd.
or maybe 2. The effects were bad, but since the whole movie was made this way the viewer could think of it as about some kind of stylisation. A shitty one, but still...and as for the mummy - the whole movie looked actually ok until this scene. I still remember facepalming as I saw it back then
I agree with all the choices except the Matrix. It was really good special effects for the time and left me really wondering how it was done at the time it was made. It doesn't hold up now but it did then and that's what counts
I agree, I remember being blown away by the metal pole-walking-smiths'-faces scene when I was younger. I saw it recently and it didn't looked as cool, but I still think that it wasn't that bad.
Just cuz it's good for the time doesn't mean they should have done it... If the technology isn't there yet, they should have figured out something else to do. There's a full CGI fight scene against the ninja vampires in Blade II (one year earlier) that's also not great, but still better.
sloucho84 The Blade fight isn't better. The CG moments are very noticeable, despite them using silhouettes and darkness as a crutch. And nobody talks about that fight. People talk about The Matrix fight.
Disagreeing with you , Matrix was revolutionary for its time, set a precedent for the use of CGI , The Mummy Returns was also an achievement for the CGI...
+Tokyo Gaijin Fucking lol, seriously? This isn't a list of "worst CGI effects for their time", it's a list of "CGI movie effects that look terrible nowadays". The fact that they were revolutionary for their time has absolutely nothing to do with it.
"Just to be clear, we're singling out the CGI from films with respectable or massive budgets that shouldn't have settled for second rate and unfinished looking effects." Nowhere does it say anything close to what you are.
It seems weird to include the Darkseekers from I am Legend on both "Top 10 Scariest CGI Monsters" and "Top 10 Worst CGI Effects". Wouldn't being a bad effect prevent it from being scary? "They are not very convincing and thus, not very scary". You said it yourself here. It seems there could be a communication gap between people making videos.
***** Well I watched the Matrix trilogy last year for the first time, I was 22 at the time and I was still fucking impressed. Not THE best I had ever seen, but definitely among the best. Far better than 90% of more recent movies. And besides being good, it had a unique appeal to it, a unique 'vibe', something that "better" movies nowadays might lack.
Dareios soieraD Simple stupid story? It has a magnificent scenario and imagination that makes it also a sci-fi. It is so stupid to talk about physics of effects and movie cause its not in real world that you can talk about physics at these scenes
easy to say that in 2018 thought. Matrix was one of the better movies for a very long time, while movies like ultraviolet was straight up shit as soon as they came out. As time passes the only movie which will stay dominent is basically lord of the rings.
how many better movies we had in 1999 in terms of cgi ? Can u even name more than 20? If not then matrix is one of the better movies for its time. Now its 2018, its unwatchable, like the rest in this list.
yea jurassic park is just 1 movie thought, i knew u would mention it since its the only movie u can mention. Now how many other movies we had which were better?
they are not ancient.. anything after 2005 deserves better cgi than scorpion king... And that ultra violet cgi is literally a 10 year old's work, u can see that there is no proffesionalism behind these scenes. Check lord of the rings and jurassic park 1, and watch how CGI PROFFESIONALS handle it in even older movies. Scorpion king is literally few years before the FREAKING AVENGERS!
Fun Fact - Apparently, the effects for the Mummy Returns had to be rushed, so the effect for the Scorpion king was finished only 8 days before the films release.
I really don't see how the I am Legend one is here. The creatures were meant to look deformed, and when I first watched it when I was younger, it terrified me.
Am I wrong in thinking most people who have a big problem with bad cgi are millennium children? As a 90’s kid I would be imptessed by most cgi that came out. What I hate is the abuse of cgi, with overly dramatic camera swooping and characters flying around defying physics. It’s like they’re really trying to impress you with all these computer grahpics. I’m impressed by real stunts and proper blending of the real thing. Nothing beats real models over cgi, until perhaps the practice becomes perfect.
***** I don't agree. The setting of the film has nothing to do with quality of CG effects. In fact its easier for being science fiction because it has a lot of architecture and non organic stuff, which is easier. Animating a character needs more work. UV is just ... gross. Should have been #1
in all fairness, cgi before 2005 was kind of an imperfect science.
True
+Teren Kowatsch It still is imperfect.
+Teren Kowatsch What about The Lord Of The Rings? That one was amazing
+LXXXV imperfect doesn't mean can't get right. CGI was still very new in terms of putting scenes and main characters together just right. Look at Avatar - a movie masterpiece almost completely CG. That was accomplished but there are still movies that can't even put together a good 5 minute CG effect together. And that's in 2016. Imagine how it was from 2000-2005. There was a reason movies like Lord of the Rings were considered masterpieces. They were the Michael Jordan's and every one else could only try and imitate.
+Teren Kowatsch It just needed insane amounts of money and people who were completely onboard with going all out with the effects, just look at Jurassic Park's CGI, that still holds up and it was one of the first. Most movies just got lazy with it and ended up with shit.
Matrix fight scene was and still is legendary. Nothing like that was ever attempted before. Get your shit together mojo. You are starting to piss people off
The idea and concept of this scene was and is brilliant. The execution not so much. There are several takes where I don't really see the need to use a CG Keanu instead of the real one and his seemingly wax-modelled face is the most distracting thing there
There are always different ways of doing things. Any attempt can be made to make the final product better or in other words, things can always be done in a better way. Although, this is highly subjective as one person's 'better' is not necessarily the same as the other persons.
And you are pissing me off, shut the fuck up little boy.
TheStrossus you call him a little boy but somehow im more inclined to believe your the child
TorvanGamer Everyone is obviously mature in this conversation, can't you notice?
I agree about scorpion king but I disagree about matrix.
tric onex I know fright the matrix was actually good
I saw almost nothing wrong with the matrix
I loved that scene in the matrix aswell
I agree with both
Just to be clear, we’re talking about The Matrix *Reloaded.* But yeah, the Agent Smiths just looked like a bunch of balloon people with no weight or effect of gravity. They look too flimsy to be real.
Universal:
1993: make dinosaurs look real, success
2001: make an actor look like a man/scorpion hybrid, epic failure
WAIT WHAT!!!!???!?!? THE MATRIX AT 10?????? That's an awesome movie and that was IMO an awesome scene...
***** Yeah but what I'm saying is that I actually liked all the effects in matrix...To me they were all great, and especially this scene to me was EPIC.
I agree. But it's early 2000's and realistic human CGI really wasn't the best. I do find this a bit ironic though as the CGI scenes during the Burly Brawl were better than the live action wire effects.
Syntax BananaZ what i don't get is why people demand realistic cgi in a non-realistic film in the first place. i mean cgi exists to do stuff that is impossible in real life so why demand realism from something that can't ever be real anyway.
pokekitty1 Simple. So it can blend into the movie's fantasy without you going "oh, that looks like a terrible effect" and ruin that scene.
I played GMOD recently and the plastic scene that he told, i thought it was GMOD.. lol
Im suprised spy kids 3 wasnt on this list.
Mace Dawg lol I agree it was really bad, but I don't know if anyone expected it to be good. I didn't.
+Mace Dawg though it was a dissapointed movie i don't think it counts since the movie takes place in a video game is not suppose to look real
Well Spy Kids 2 should have also been on here
+Mace Dawg kids don't need good CGI xD
+Mace Dawg in the opening of the video it says these films had massive budgets and shouldn't have settled for poor cgi.
spy kids is made by the same people who made sharkboy and lavagirl, so there's literally no standards, bar could not possibly be lower for spy kids
Leave The Matrix out of this.
agreed. i have seen plenty cgi effects worse then that but better then i am legends
agree
Yeah... the plot is literally happening inside a computer program... it should not look "realistic"
Fr!!!!
You do realize that Lord of the Rings came out at the same time right? That had infinitely better CGI.
The Mummy Returns is still better than The Mummy 2017.
No fucking lie.
FACT!
"The Mummy Tomb of the Dragon Empire" was better!
Yes, it is and they should have good attempts in CGI effects.
The movie was good,but the cgi effect was terrible...apart from it i love the movie,..a childhood memories
Yea I hate low quality CGI and low quality videos. 480p
Hahaha lol.
videogamegenius 480p is fine with me
Evan Guthrie 480p is the BARE minimum. But 720p is the minimum that looks good!
Pedro Albuquerque Santos I always use 480p.
***** haha
i disagree with the matrix, but i agree with i am legend... why couldn't they have uses real actors
worst in Legend was intro with that red car....sooooooooo CGI.
It would have taken a long time to find a lot of actors to play as an army of monsters.
+Ricqwan Davis (Ricqwan DavisTV) And money.
Jevauni Jones lol I forgot that
They initially wanted to use real actors, but they looked extremely ridiculous in ther makeup, "like a group of angry mimes", so they chose CGI.
I disagree about The Matrix Reloaded because it was made in 2003 and that CGI was pretty good for that time but if The Matrix Reloaded used that kind of CGI now yes it could be on this list
Even in 2003 that scene was bad.
Then why was The Matrix’s (original) CGI scenes perfectly passable and it was made in the 90’s
Karotzz the cgi was good for THAT TIME? Look at the CGI from terminator 2, made 12 years before matrix reloaded but is a hundred times better.
@@gordonramsay6286 Exactly. Jurassic Park was released in 1992 and their CGI still holds up. Also, CGI isn’t just about how well the graphics are made but how it’s incorporated into the movie. Jurassic Park used animatronics for the close ups so it made the CGI parts relatively seamless. But in the Matrix Reloaded it goes from a few brief realistic fighting moves… to all of a sudden *_everyone_* is a balloon animal and can jump over buildings. Too ambitious.
You think that was good for 2003? LOL. Ever heard of Lord of the Rings?
WatchMojo- Top 10 Worst CGI Effects In movies
Birdemic- Hold my beer
That should have been number 1 my friend
That would be on the list
@@dragon_bro_0 ummm have you seen the amazing bulk? yeah you haven't right? please don't watch it ,birdemic looks like heaven came down to bless you compared to amazing bulk which looks like the deepest layer of hell came to shit all over you
That babyface in the last Twilight movie!
That baby was creepy AF
That thing was nightmare fuel.
+daneimp Or any face in any Twilight movie
To everyone's reaction to your ridiculous WTF comment.. @Tylor
Pewdi would say: ...I DON'T CARE...
What I would say: ...WHO GIVES A FLYIN FUCK...
What my band mates would say: haha Lolis but ..FUCK YOUR WEBSITE MINES BETTER.. in the back ground look if they got Asains Bitches..??.. -u-
What my homies would say: ...I DON'T.. GIVE AH.. !!FUCK!!...
What my home girls say: ....YOU LONELY ASS MOTHERFUCKER....
My niggas: ...DAMN DOG QUIT JERKIN YO SHIT YOU STOP THAT RIGHNOW AN FIND YOSELF A REAL GURL...
What white Girls say: OMG EWW LOSER....
What white Guys say: ..WOW YOU POOR PATHETIC LOSER..
What black Girls say: ...OMG MY NIGGAH YOU LONELY ASS FUCK...
What black Guys say: FUCK OUT MY FACE WITH YOUR GAY SHIT
what everyone would probably say
Is that no one here gives a FUCK about your adult website we're talking about twilight and you pop out of nowhere and put "Best Adult Site for Hookup - tinyurl. com/o25fvee (all countries) really dude explore the world and find yourself a mate because websites are for losers poor lonely lonely ass losers
Brandon Campbell What I would say. Dude, seriously? Who cares?
Is it just me or does the matrix Effects not look that bad?
Ikr
OMG im such a big fan of u! are u the real one?
ילד לבן 888 yes my son
Hes not tye real one
its just you.
The matrix wasnt bad considering the time it was made
Asheeb Nataf what do you mean the time it was made?
Its was done by the same man who made killer bean
@@gordonramsay6286 the cgi must considered acceptable because it looks good for a 2003 film where technology is that good yet
not that good yet.*
GUYS REMEMBER THESE ARE JUST OPINIONS
Id say King Kong and Matrix was underrated
Considering King Kong was made in 2005 and they didint have the same features and budget to make it better
also it had some very very cool scenes and its not supposed to be very realistic it’s supposed to have merciless since it had LITERAL DINOS
Id say in my opinion King Kong was pretty good the only bad scenes was the Apatasaurous Stampede
Why does The Scorpion King look like Lord Farquaad
Must be his reincarnation
I thought the King Kong stampede was actually pretty decent
Nah man, when I first saw it I thought to myself, why did they fuck up that scene, cause the rest of the movie looked good. It was terrible in comparison to the rest of the movie.
The entire movie had very impressive CGI, but the stampede scene was just a little off. And it wasn't entirely because of the CGI, it just didn't work with the human interactions! It didn't click, didn't feel like the actors where actually immerged n involved in the scene. The Director, actors, Green screens, the plot and animations and how the scene was shot all had a bit of influence on how it turned out imo.
I loved that movie and most it's effects but that whole scene felt a little too greenscreeny!!
sasuke uchiha agreed. Looking back at it, it looks very very fake. Terrible in fact, lol
I read that as the kim jong in stampede 😂
Half of them was
Ultraviolet is terrible. Seriously, it's way worse than the ones after it.
I would feel ripped-off if I saw anything on that level in a PS2.
I think spawn should have been on here. u mean, have you SEEN what satan looks like in that? he looks like a Muppet aardvark
+Baluar ppl need to stop ragging on the ps2
I'm not raging at the PS2... what made you think that? I was raging at the movie. The PS2 has some pretty cool looking games.
+Baluar
Yea i used to love that movie...but the CGI effects made my mind changed. XD
CHAOS HERETIC!
New theory on Matrix: Reloaded's Smiths Brawl shitty CGI. As the fight drags on and Smith replicates even further, RAM on the whole system becomes overencumbered and, unable to purge, keeps dropping image quality to being able to keep performance
I buy THAT for a dollar!
That is not how it works lmao...
Are you talking about in the realm of the Matrix? Or in real life?
Hahaha i love it
@@the_real_vdegenne explain it then genius
I swear I watch these Mojo videos when it's like 3 AM
Reading this at 3:12 a.m. lol
@@k.sallar5218 reading your comment at 2:12 am lol
It's 3:49 here lmao
1:55am😂😂
1:40 am
Seriously Ultraviolet Should be On Top of this List!!!!
true
agree
Yea
Actually it shouldn't be on the list at all since they broke their own rule. It was an independent movie not a hollywood blockbuster and had half the budget of the second lowest budget movie in the list, Along Came a Spider.
It had pretty terrible effects actually.
I think matrix's scene was still pretty cool, for its time
Fun fact, the " zombies " in I am legend are actually vampires.
In the book they’re both, the living vampire dead and the zombie dead-dead. The film infuriated me as it’s my fave book and they just tore it to pieces
@@snachmyweave4806 ah haven't heard that take yet! Didn't know there was a book, everyone just talks about the movie. Were there more parts that you didn't like?or did just that aspect ruin the whole film for you? I mean, the amount of story you can put in a book is sm more yk, one movie could never realistically cover it, so just enjoy it yk.
How dare you insult the matrix. It's over 10 years old, and back then, the effects were really cool. They still are.
They were shit then
If it were made today with the same effects, it'll be egged on (literally!)
Renesme as a baby in Breaking Dawn
My entire family cringed when we sw how bad THAT cgi was...
Margot Smith lmfao I screamed
ShortBreaddi 8
OMG YES WTF I WAS JUST ABOUT TO SAY THIS
YES!!!
It's funny that King Kong is in this, when it won Best VIsual Effects in the Oscars.
*Wtf?! Those zombies in "I am legend" Are SCARY AF!*
kinda yeah. I'm glad I watched in daylight!
Not really...
same shit I said lmao
They vampires cuh
Man I'm watching this before I sleep and now I don't want to sleep
the rock looks like a character from.shrek
Christian olivas. Shrek is love, shrek is life 💗
Onions
@7Ahilles I swear i was gonna say the same. the corridor crew, good channel.
Can anyone ever be more true
Which rock? From which movie is it?
I will put here The Hobbit - The battle of the 5 armies (War scene). As a Tolkien fan and a LOTR huge fan, i was sooo disappointet on how the cgi fucked up The hobbit trilogy in terms of war, too much cgi, compared to The battle of helms deep or the charge of the rohirrim fot LOTR, The hobbit war scenes suck.
You are right i just saw it it was awful...the battle on the pellenor fields looked so much better
Yea, I was really disappointed with the CGI in that movie.
The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies was released in 17 December 2014, the video was uploaded on 15 August 2013, so there is no way The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies could be in there... do you people even watch the release date?
MascaMD Good point. Also The Hobbit is nowhere near as bad in CGI as any of these films, it certainly isn't perfect but it sure as he'll isn't one of the top 10 worst CGI. Weta is one of the best companies for CGI. Although of course some blame goes to everyone involved, I believe the quality was lower due to the short notice on the 2 part film being made into a trilogy.. Azog was one of the last CGI changes in the first Hobbit and he looked absolutely amazing, Dain, elves, Gandalf and some others however did have terrible CG animation.
TheSpartanCV Thorin and Kili died in the books dude, cant exactly make the movie differ on that point.
I still can't understand why in I Am Legend, they chose to go with CG for the zombies/monsters, instead of just having guys in make up.
lol
ikr
I read about that, apparently they did try to get actors with makeup to be the monsters, but because of what their infection did to their bodies, they breathe extremely rapidly, and actors that tried to do that ended up hyperventilating, so they decided to just CGI them up. I'm okay with it, since they had Mike Patton do the sounds all of them make.
I agree. The "zombies" in I Am Legend looked more like rabid Neo-Nazi skinhead street bums than they looked like monsters!
They should've just stuck with vampires like in the book
I actually like the "bad" cgi from the ultraviolet movie. With movies like that where the entire opening is comic drawn style i don't really expect realism, but try to use my fantasy/imagination more. This makes it more enjoyable. If you think more like: "what im watching right now is *only* telling the story and leaves your imagination do the rest" instead of "it happened exactly like this...", then a lot of movies/scenes pass the obstacle of trying to be as realistic as possible. I'm also pretty sure that "Ultraviolet" didnt try to be realistic looking in the first place, if you consider the weird filter which makes the movie look weird and different. They really didnt try to hide it which makes it great in a different way. Now when a movie tries to be super realistic and fails with cgi then that is cringe worthy to me, which is basically 90% of what we have today.
2001: Rock as Scorpion King
2019: Rock is Black Adam!
hen it comes to the catwoman movie, it would be nive to have a white actress play a white character
First of all that's racist second please stop talking your grammar is going to lower my own IQ
Well I'm just saying that in the comics, she was white.
Which comics? The batman comics or the catwoman comics?
in all the ones i have read she is white (catwoman and batman comics)
Because in the original catwoman comics 50s-80s she's black
Blaming older movies because of their CGI is like blaming this video for not being HD in 2016.
That doesn’t mean it’s good.
Doesn’t make it bad, how can you have bad cgi if there isnt good cgi to compare.
"Dark seekers aren't very scary" But if one came at you i bet money yo ass would run😂
I Am Legend CGI was awesome. I didn’t even once think they were shit. And they were pretty freakin scary if you ask me.
I think the Matrix suffered in CGI because the computer running the simulation didn't have enough RAM.
I really don't get why I Am Legend is on here. I feel it was extremely well done especially for the time
zXMNTheBigXz Right? I love that movie. Really don't get why people hate on it so much
No.
***** Yes. It really astounds me
The effects were laughable. Get glasses.
Seth Brundle Already have em, but nice try bro ;)
Watch mojo: worst cgi movie effects
Filipino movies: Am I a joke to you?
5:26 _Unbelievable fake impossible actions_
Fast and furious: “Yeah... *you’re hired!”*
The Matrix? are you kidding me dude? It has the best special effect of any movie ever made. I don't see any movie with even-close effects to the Matrix. considering its more than 10 years old.
It's a matter of opinion, don't like t make your own list. Good luck with that.
a matter of opinion? "Visual Effects" is a matter of opinion. you know what. am not gonna say anything. your just too stupid.
My asshole blasting out a huge turd would be visually more appealing than all of the matrix movies combined.
Kotton Mouth Wow you must have the most amazing slowmobulittimeassexplosion ever!
In LOTR the Ent scenes were bad, but the whole movie is masterpiece so who cares right?
Jaws 3. Shark still hasn't moved a fin to this day.
Evil CM Punk That video is why I'm here, shocked its not here
Jack Bryson That was a practical effect.
VanillaFejz The shark was CGI, though.
Evil CM Punk yes it was
+Evil CM Punk No, Jaws III was 1983. It was a practical effect. Early 80's CGI was Tron (1982) and The Last Starfighter (1984), they weren't rendering sharks in 1983... Even bad ones...
The majority of these are fine imo. Leaving out big budget films was a mistake. Their overuse of cgi to the point where they can't make it all look good is the problem with Hollywood right now.
What do ya mean? All of these movies are big budget.
The scorpion king had terrible CGI but I disagree about The Matrix Reloaded.
Oh come on number 10? That scene was as legendary as the whole first movie!
Mojo is seeing this through hindsight goggles. You gotta look at it from the perspective when it first came out.
The scene was badass and I still think it was one of the coolest things in the movie... But it looked awful. It still does. The Path Of Neo video game looked pretty much the same and it was a PS2 game.
There is nothing in the second movie that even comes close to the first.
Isnt the matrix a digital reality anyway? its gets a free pass in my eyes. maybe they did it on purpose.
Watchmojo sucks tbh.
Don't understand how they get so many views and subscribers.
I haven't seen Ultraviolet, but that clip you showed was HIDEOUS. And I'm the kind of guy who can let bad effects slide, but that looked like a PS2 cutscene, and not a very good one. The Scorpion King, well with a film like that, you could defend the CG by saying he's an overworldly demon, so maybe he shouldn't look fully real. It's an excuse, but you could say it. There is nooooo excusing Ultraviolet's motorcycle chase, that's the real world, look real dammit.
Believe me, you don´t need to see Ultraviolet
well the bike was riding on walls, soo it isn't exactly real world, although when i saw ultraviolet i liked it.. but that was it, not a film worth mentioning thou
To be fair, the whole movie had that blocky cartoony effect. The motorbike scene just pushed it to far.
Logey Bogey And my username is a guy's. What, you think I was a transvestite?
Ultraviolet is actually one of my favorite movies. It really does look good on bluray.
I remember the James Bond one. When it came out and I saw it for the first time, I was just like WTF?!
The Matrix and I am Legend have no business in this video.
Lmao the rock looks like a GTA character 😂😂😂
Anuel Not LITTT yep
LOL Agreed! ...and all they had to do is spend a little more time on it (maybe a month, tops)
and it would have been much better! I'm assuming it was finished in a rush to get it out in time for it's release!
@@PerplexiaX or the effects back then were not as good as today
Skip Ad Well, the little gremlin-like warrior guys looked pretty good...
actually, it just needs some contrast and color saturation work... that alone would make it a lot better looking! Still a great flick! :-)
@@PerplexiaX maybe but some if these effects should have never been in the movies.
Yet no spy kids? that animation could be better made in BLENDER.
It's gets a pass because it's a kids movie.
mcrfan343 I suppose...
+Joe Bob Heh! Don't remind me of my childhood. It's too scary. D:
+Joe Bob More like Pivot. :/
+Joe Bob You didn't even ever use Blender more than "creating" a box, didn't you?
And now, you can say nothing to infinity war.
idk man, after rewatching some effects looked... weird
I know it was 1995, but the monkeys in Jumanji were horrible!
Matrix cgi was godlike back then
they must hate matrix, i saw no reason to be in this list, lol
@@alexsandroangel The effects didin't aged well
talking about bad CGI quality
in a 480p video
just let that sink in for a moment
This needs to be updated now that justice league and sonic are things
The only bad cg in justice league is henry cavills mustache
Doctabruh3456 Also steppenwolf and his minions
Ehh theyre werent that many flaws it looks pretty acceptional not bad by any means
a hecking walnut sonic got fixed and the cgi on the original wasn’t bad. It’s like you don’t know what cgi is
Watch the snyder cut
I thought the zombies in Legend were pretty creepy looking
Hey thanks for that. Idk y I never thought of that. I always thought it was kinda weird they hurt from sunlight but now that makes sense!
at the time, all these effects were amazing! it's just graphics advance so rapidly that older cgis look out of date incredibly fast!
the dinosaurs in king Kong looked pretty real tbh
Yeah. It was matter of the actors.
yeah , better than most of new movies
The problem there is more in the bad blending of dinosaurs and people.
It's all about of how bad they were inserted on the scene.
lets all remember that there really are no dinosaurs.
I remember when I thought the matrix neo agent battle CGI was bad effects but then I realized in a sense that what they were doing was on a level that was technically not in the real world and was bordering on limitations of their digital selves in a digital world so if they looked weird or plastic like or whatever else then its because neo was getting so great that they were actually pushing the limits of their reality and whats possible and becoming digitally altered forms of themselves which then made sense to me and I excused the bad CGI for what was probably proper CGI and possibly even intended for that very reason.
UltraViolet was the 2nd worst CGI, I honestly ever seen. I liked the Matrix CGI and I cannot lie.
#1 worst CGI is birdemic
Nicky 2ds Birdemic doesn't even have CGI, it has some sort of special effects in it though and yea they look like trash.
Deceiving list mainly because most of the movies on this list are when CGI was still at that stage where making things realistic was almost impossible. But for its time it was considered good.
That is what I was thinking when I watched the list as well.
Vermalgab Boom
the first matrix movie was one of the biggest mistakes... look at the year it was made -_- - Production would have been at around 2000. Go and take a look at pc games from that time.
That's not true at all. The effects in Jurassic park are more impressive than anything on this list, and it was also made several years earlier than all of the movies listed. Like he said, they all have respectable or large budgets, with the exception of Ultraviolet.
Elida Landry the dinosaurs in jurassic park weren't cgi. they were real-life models that they moved around on set. even the "currently-being-eaten" humans were replaced with models. no cgi :3
Artofdadress Streamer Jurassic Park used a mixture of animatronics and CGI.
I think with the Matrix, it's the only movie I know of where you can give the lower quality effects a pass, because it fits with the aspect of the movie taking place inside a computerized universe. It's like, there's so many Agent Smiths in one place, so the computer has a hard time loading them all correctly; so it has to lower the quality to compensate.
It's a little like how TRON had some issues in the printing process when the back-lighting was composited in, and certain frames came back over-exposed. But director Steven Lisberger kept the bad frames because it fit with the computer world sparking and bleeping and doing other little things in the background.
Not sure the problem's with the Agent Smiths, but with Gumby Neo. At least, that's what I felt looked wrong with the scene when I first saw it in the theater.
The agents and neo are in the same area, have you played mmo wih a shitty pc, don't mind your character in a over populated area you have to lower the visual quality otherwise you wont even move therefore you char will also look horrible.
lol, so the matrix can render literally an entire world of people, animals, plants, etc., but not a room-full of the same guy. Yea, not buying that.
George Bell A computer of any kind can have issues with glitches and corrupted encoding if it suddenly creates multiple versions of the same guy. It's like if in a video game, you're shooting down a bunch of random enemies, but one guy can't die because he keeps popping back up again and again and again. Imagine if that glitch was expanded to include an entire room-full of the same character, all with the same code that describes who he is and where he is, and imagine that none of them can die. Now the computer becomes confused as hell, just trying to make sense of the duplicate code required to make dozens of the same guy appear in the same room.
I'll admit, I don't know if that explanation is entirely accurate. But I've seen similar things happen in videos about horrible game glitches, and they certainly don't allow the computer to run efficiently, or even work at all. So seeing the Agent Smith clones reduced in resolution still makes some sense, I think.
It doesn't excuse the computer animators from doing a low-quality job on the film, but within the film's narrative, there's still an argument to be made for why it still looks like it makes sense.
I like to explain Clu's CGI-face by saying that he's such an old program that his file has been corrupted.
THE CGI IS SO BAD IT MAKES THE MONSTER MOVIES LOOK SO MUCH SCARIER
1:09 To Infinity and beyond
the matrix one shouldn't be on here. I don't know about you, but that fight was one of the best fights in the whole series.
They even mentioned that in one of their vids.
It sure wasn't. The CGI in that sequence was horrendous.
The design of the fight sequence was very good, but the CGI were very bad that made the scene unrealistic and dull, which made it less enjoyable.
one of the best and most pointless
It was so stupid. That fight scene is when Matrix jumped the shark for me.
When these movies came out, I never really thought that any of these effects were necessarily bad. I guess as technology moves on up, so does our standards of what it brings.
Out of all these, I actually did think the scorpion king's face looked phony even when I first watched it.
I disliked, because some of those effects looks good for me, try watch amazing bulk for the best movie effects!!
Matrix Reloaded wasn't bad. Shame on you.
Robert Konicki i agree
Storywise, it was a travesty. Cgi wise, it makes the cut. 👌
CGI wasn't too bad, but overall bad movie man
The Matrix Reloaded CGI wasn't that bad when watching in the cinema. Plus that was in 2003 when photorealistic character animation wan in its infancy.
That's exactly the problem. Photorealistic human CGI will never look perfect so they had no business putting a Cartoon Neo on the screen for 5 minutes straight. People know the difference between real actor and CGI cartoon and it destroys their suspension of disbelief. Much more so when they go from CGI and instantly cut to the real actors face.
"Hey audience, you're not watching a CGI movie, remember" The fight was awesome. but they put waaaaay too much faith in how good their effects looked
Plus the movie was set in virtual reality for the most part, perhaps entirely if you believe some theories. Agent Smith was hacking the system basically, making it behave in ways it wasn't supposed to, and so was Neo. So to me it made perfect sense that things might look a little odd.
Ultraviolet should have been 1
or maybe 2. The effects were bad, but since the whole movie was made this way the viewer could think of it as about some kind of stylisation. A shitty one, but still...and as for the mummy - the whole movie looked actually ok until this scene. I still remember facepalming as I saw it back then
When I first saw this scene from Scorpion King I thought it was from a PS2 game or something
Top ten channels you watch when you’re bored
I agree with all the choices except the Matrix. It was really good special effects for the time and left me really wondering how it was done at the time it was made. It doesn't hold up now but it did then and that's what counts
I agree, I remember being blown away by the metal pole-walking-smiths'-faces scene when I was younger. I saw it recently and it didn't looked as cool, but I still think that it wasn't that bad.
Just cuz it's good for the time doesn't mean they should have done it... If the technology isn't there yet, they should have figured out something else to do.
There's a full CGI fight scene against the ninja vampires in Blade II (one year earlier) that's also not great, but still better.
the dark seekers (I am Legend) weren't too bad either.
HEY!!! leave blade out of this!!
sloucho84
The Blade fight isn't better. The CG moments are very noticeable, despite them using silhouettes and darkness as a crutch. And nobody talks about that fight. People talk about The Matrix fight.
Disagreeing with you , Matrix was revolutionary for its time, set a precedent for the use of CGI , The Mummy Returns was also an achievement for the CGI...
+Tokyo Gaijin Fucking lol, seriously? This isn't a list of "worst CGI effects for their time", it's a list of "CGI movie effects that look terrible nowadays". The fact that they were revolutionary for their time has absolutely nothing to do with it.
"Just to be clear, we're singling out the CGI from films with respectable
or massive budgets that shouldn't have settled for second rate and
unfinished looking effects."
Nowhere does it say anything close to what you are.
Tokyo Gaijin Oh yes :v
yahwehsgod It is that they should not put them here :(
Meant to reply to aaron
"Top 10 Worst CGI Movie Effects"
Meanwhile me: immediately has flashbacks to Black Widow (2020) and Black Panther (2018)
It seems weird to include the Darkseekers from I am Legend on both "Top 10 Scariest CGI Monsters" and "Top 10 Worst CGI Effects". Wouldn't being a bad effect prevent it from being scary? "They are not very convincing and thus, not very scary". You said it yourself here. It seems there could be a communication gap between people making videos.
>top 10 worst CGI effects
>matrix on the list
just lol.
***** matrix is most overrated movie ever. simple, stupid story covered by tones of fx
*****
Well I watched the Matrix trilogy last year for the first time, I was 22 at the time and I was still fucking impressed. Not THE best I had ever seen, but definitely among the best. Far better than 90% of more recent movies. And besides being good, it had a unique appeal to it, a unique 'vibe', something that "better" movies nowadays might lack.
Dareios soieraD Simple stupid story? It has a magnificent scenario and imagination that makes it also a sci-fi. It is so stupid to talk about physics of effects and movie cause its not in real world that you can talk about physics at these scenes
MATRIX IN TOP 10 WORST????????? ARE YOU MAD??????????
Dude, The Matrix sucks. Get over yourself.
easy to say that in 2018 thought.
Matrix was one of the better movies for a very long time, while movies like ultraviolet was straight up shit as soon as they came out.
As time passes the only movie which will stay dominent is basically lord of the rings.
Never ever, ever will I disagree with you on that piece of shit called "Ultraviolet" but The Matrix sucked in 1999 and it still sucks now.
how many better movies we had in 1999 in terms of cgi ?
Can u even name more than 20?
If not then matrix is one of the better movies for its time.
Now its 2018, its unwatchable, like the rest in this list.
yea jurassic park is just 1 movie thought, i knew u would mention it since its the only movie u can mention.
Now how many other movies we had which were better?
Dwayne (the plastic) Johnson
Nothing 2721 lmfao
Lmfao
Nothing2721 i know right lmfao
Dwayne “The Balloon” Johnson
What the hell? King Kong got best Visual effects award and undoubtedly its the best CGI till date even though the film released in 2005
How could they forget Mortal Kombat:Annihilation? That movie's CGI is so horrible it makes you think it was made in the 1970's
Also the budget was of $30,000,000... wow...
MestariDuff Holy shit O_o
The first Wolverine movie. The restroom scene when he's checking out his blades in front of the mirror.
+Rene Aensland That scene far out-sucks anything on this list!
The multiple Smith one was one of the best scene ever in Matrix.Yeah
WatchMojo: includes Matrix
Sharknado and Birdemic: *happy animal noises*
None of this CGI is THAT bad...if anything, it's just dated...if the same CGI was made TODAY then I could see your point.
Guardiane Hello Lester :)
I agree. For example, the ring was made in 2005. What could expect from it cgi?
Guardiane They just ran out of ideas
they are not ancient.. anything after 2005 deserves better cgi than scorpion king...
And that ultra violet cgi is literally a 10 year old's work, u can see that there is no proffesionalism behind these scenes.
Check lord of the rings and jurassic park 1, and watch how CGI PROFFESIONALS handle it in even older movies.
Scorpion king is literally few years before the FREAKING AVENGERS!
Holy shit that Ultra Violet scene looked beyond terrible, what the hell.
Looks like an late PS1 game w/ slightly updated graphics.
Fun Fact - Apparently, the effects for the Mummy Returns had to be rushed, so the effect for the Scorpion king was finished only 8 days before the films release.
King Kong 2005 is in this list, are you fucking mad man. The CGI in that movie still holds up today, and was amazing for its time.
I didn't even notice the poor CGI in I am Legend. That movie was just too good. Never question it. NEVER
i agree i thoughti t just look normal
Well, then. That was... informative.
My personal opinion. It was great.
The Matrix Agent Smith fight doesn't belong on that list.
It belongs in a museum!
I 100% agree with you
Agreed! This is one of the best action sequences in any movie EVER!!
Let’s be glad the Corridor Crew fixed the Scorpion King.
There is a difference with
Bad CGI and Old CGI.
>uploaded in 480p
that really shows us what's up with the cgi thanks
I really don't see how the I am Legend one is here. The creatures were meant to look deformed, and when I first watched it when I was younger, it terrified me.
Yes, when you were younger.
Still scary, besides, when did I say how old I was at the time?
Sure, they were meant to look deformed. But they weren't meant to look like cheap CGI. That's the point.
Oggy and the cockroaches has the worst cgi ive ever seen on a cartoon in the world.
Am I wrong in thinking most people who have a big problem with bad cgi are millennium children? As a 90’s kid I would be imptessed by most cgi that came out.
What I hate is the abuse of cgi, with overly dramatic camera swooping and characters flying around defying physics. It’s like they’re really trying to impress you with all these computer grahpics. I’m impressed by real stunts and proper blending of the real thing. Nothing beats real models over cgi, until perhaps the practice becomes perfect.
Kinda think Ultraviolet deserved number 1
***** I don't agree. The setting of the film has nothing to do with quality of CG effects. In fact its easier for being science fiction because it has a lot of architecture and non organic stuff, which is easier. Animating a character needs more work. UV is just ... gross. Should have been #1
fagar ehrh I agree with you. UV's so bad I think the Scorpion King in The Mummy Returns deserves no. 4 or lower.
Ultraviolet was made in 2006 i'm 100% they had better CGI's then a SNES :S
this video is weird.."technology at a point of time" is totally forgotten here...
suvam k Ikr? and not every movie had the budget of The Lord of the Rings trilogy
Every adaptation of Richard Matheson's "I Am Legend" has been bad, but the Will Smith attempt was borderline offensive.
The agent Smith fight is not that bad.
Yeah it's alright