You're actually a pretty good modeler...it's just copying an existing design, not really 'designing' but it's good to see how you model at speed - Appreciate your tips and having a little peek inside TTT's mind processes! Thanks!
I used "convert to sheet metal" from solid block as it appeared easier to me at first. I guess if I would care to work on a solid model more first and make required cuts - it might have been faster, nevertheless I made it in 7 minutes and will keep to this method as it helps me so much in my day to day work
I think it is due to the measure of 90 because it seems to represent the internal width of the piece, but apparently it is not so, this measure represents the width of the back part of the piece which has a 1 mm gap with the sides of the piece.
Turns out I had already made this part before and I had that one correct, I compared that one with this one and found my error. Even know the dimensions were all the same. Bizarre.
Hmm for some reason I am not getting that mass? I get 791.42 grams. I made a drawing from my part and checked all my dimensions. I usually find a bonehead mistake, but I am not seeing it this time.
Cool class, loving your tutorials Toby!
Awww yeah thanks!
You're actually a pretty good modeler...it's just copying an existing design, not really 'designing' but it's good to see how you model at speed - Appreciate your tips and having a little peek inside TTT's mind processes! Thanks!
Nice - thanks!
I used "convert to sheet metal" from solid block as it appeared easier to me at first. I guess if I would care to work on a solid model more first and make required cuts - it might have been faster, nevertheless I made it in 7 minutes and will keep to this method as it helps me so much in my day to day work
Awesome
Aww yeah thansk Kev!
sheetmetal class! woo hoo!
Awww yeah!!!
Wait mechanical engineering focuses on some sheet metal?
Yes indeed!
hello Toby
it seems to me that the measurement of 80mm is wrong, since the internal radius of the plate is 6mm, so 90-(6x2)=78mm.
I think it is due to the measure of 90 because it seems to represent the internal width of the piece, but apparently it is not so, this measure represents the width of the back part of the piece which has a 1 mm gap with the sides of the piece.
Correct!
Turns out I had already made this part before and I had that one correct, I compared that one with this one and found my error. Even know the dimensions were all the same. Bizarre.
What was the issue? Material going the wrong direction?
Hmm for some reason I am not getting that mass? I get 791.42 grams. I made a drawing from my part and checked all my dimensions. I usually find a bonehead mistake, but I am not seeing it this time.
I saw your other comment - nice job!