Machine Learning vs AI vs Deep Learning - The Differences Explained
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 лют 2024
- We often, unwittingly, use the terms machine learning, AI, and deep learning, interchangeably, however they are actually quite different. In this video I take a look at these terms plus touch on Artificial General Intelligence, as well as the Turing Test.
---
Let Me Explain T-shirt: teespring.com/gary-explains-l...
Twitter: / garyexplains
Instagram: / garyexplains
#garyexplains - Наука та технологія
The content Gary has you can't find it anywhere else! Gary is the 🐐 of tech UA-cam. I wish I could download this man's wisdom.
I liked that this popped up. I am now a subscriber. I want to say thank you, not just for the information, but for not playing any music while you were speaking. I wish more YT hosts would do that.
Please, let GARY explain.
Brilliant yet heavily underrated channel. Keep it going Gary.
Much appreciated
You know when you think you had an idea all on your own and a few days later this video shows up... A more complete one, mine would have been what is the difference between AI and Deep learning. When I think about it, I know what triggered this question in my head, that I needed to understand this distinction better. I watched a video on the new Tesla v12 self-driving software. A month ago, I thought self-driving was dead after I watched a video of the v11 version in action which is based on code lines. The v12 isn't perfect, but seems much more promising than the previous one even though they started the v12 from scratch a year ago.
Awesome and wholesome information. I have never seen such a lucid yet comprehensive explanation like this one. Excellent!!
Glad you enjoyed it!
Great lesson professor!
Fantastic video, thanks a lot!
Glad you liked it!
There are also Genetic algorithms but they don't seem to popular anymore but they were back in the late 90's. They might still make a comeback like ANN's did.
I like how you like to explain things from an independent point of view. You don't just take things at face value. Today I now understand why the AI from the Big corps is mainly good for story telling.
Very well explained 👍 thank you.
Evil SkyNet-version of AGI is centuries away.
Kindest regards, neighbours and friends.
We thank you.
So Data from TNG would fall under the category of AGI?
Thanks Gary
Very welcome 👍
Will AGI be able to tick I am not a robot and pick out the traffic lights?
This begs the question: is there really such a thing as _HGI_ or do most humans actually exhibit an advanced form of what we now call AI?
I, for one, welcome our Cylon overlords! (nervous laugh)
👍
There is a fourth kind that predates the three you mention. Data representation and visualization boosted by human interaction. For example back in the 1980s we built the first graphical timeline interface using LISP machines that represented activities and resource constraints that was adapted for various spacecraft missions (rovers, flybys, orbiters, etc.) used by human schedulers for sequence generation on remote spacecraft. AI was later layered on top of for auto sequence generation back in the 90s and more sophisticated AI planning and scheduling algorithms evolved from that.
I am AGI
This is simply wrong. I've written a longer comment explaining why, but apparently that one doesn't show up for anyone else but me. But please don't spread this misinformation. DL is included in ML which is included in the field of AI. Even an agent playing tic-tac-toe and the system on your phone that makes you write "duck" can legitimately be called AI. After following the field for perhaps 20 years, I'm surprised to find people suddenly thinking AI (a term that has been in use since the Macy comferences in the sixties (ed., correction 50s); with more or less the exact same meaning) is only about intelligent thought as opposed to intelligent action. Also, I have started seeing people think that "artificial" means fake, but this is also horribly wrong, it, in this context, simply means created/engineered (for now) by humans. Neither can you fake playing tic-tac-toe nor can you fake answering questions and these are tasks that require intelligence; in the behavioristic sense of the word. Hence these systems qualify as being AI.
I disagree. It was McCarthy who coined the term “AI” in 1955 in connection with a proposed summer workshop at Dartmouth College. In the proposal he wrote, "The study is to proceed on the basis of the conjecture that every aspect of learning or any other feature of intelligence can in principle be so precisely described that a machine can be made to simulate it. An attempt will be made to find how to make machines use language, form abstractions and concepts solve kinds of problems now reserved for humans and improve themselves ." That is AGI. Can't be described any other way.
@@GaryExplainssee response under the other comment.
Question. Wouldn't AGI also require (for lack of a better word)"emotionally healthy" intelligence. To be unable to fabricate when dealing with concrete facts. In other words to not lie. My question is where do machines actually become human-like (with all our problems). We can't be creating "sicko" AGI. I know this is on the philosophical end of the spectrum but none the less part of it. I'll never see it. I'm personally too old. And frankly, as long as I'm being forthcoming, don't want to watch it if it isn't done well; any more than I like watching the current social polarization. Whew, that was a mouthful for one of your videos. I do enjoy them.
I've long said AI isn't intelligent. This confirms the corruption of the term AI.