The Battle of Kadesh between Ramses II of Egypt and the Hittite Empire is the first and most well documented battle in all of Egyptian History The Battle of Kadesh is also the largest and most massive chariot battle in history with over 6000 chariots on both sides combined🔥🛷🔥 Hittites have also the very first peace treaty in history
Correctiions for you: 1) The Hittites did not use iron weapons. They were a thoroughly Bronze Age culture. They did, however, seem to have a lot more iron than their neighbors, and used it to make prestige items. 2) It's "Hattusili", not "Hutusali". And there were three of them. It sounds like you're talking about Hattusili I (~1650~1620), who was the first significant conquering king of the Hittite Old Kingdom. If you wanted name a peak of the Hittite empire, it would probably be Mursili II (~1317~1293), because the extent of Hittite territory reached its peak under him. You could say that the Hittites reached the peak of their diplomatic power under Hattusili III (~1274~1249), who sealed the famous peace treaty with Rameses II of Egypt. (Which is actually the third treaty we know of that the Hittites sealed with Egypt.) 3) You would need to expand the territory map in order to show its extant so that it included most of northern Syria as far as the River Khabur in the east under Mursili's reign. You would probably also need to include those little gaps of territory on your map. In the south-west, Mursili controlled Millawanda, which is what that gap seems to mean. In the north-west, it's trickier. That was where the land of Pala was, but we don't know its extent, so we don't know if it included that area. 4) The attack of the Sea Peoples coalition occurred in the 12th, not 13th century BCE (1177 BCE). And their kingdom didn't begin its decline then, that is when it was destroyed.
thanks for commenting! heres my rebuttal :) 1. The Hittites are the oldest known civilization to use Iron, think theres an example of a dagger found around 2500BC. And from what we can gather they were known to be experimenting with the metal, being one of the first to not smelt iron from meteorites. 2. Yeah, i speak with quite a heavy Somerset/Bristolian accent, some words are just hard to say for me :) 3. It's a vague map, most history youtubers get around the whole "we don't actually know the full extent of the territory ruled by a certain nation by adding a blur to the borders. I think that looks a bit naff so i go for the solid white line. Technically i should have included Troy under Hittite rule, but again, its a vague map. 4. The sea peoples did not all attack at once, its a long drawn out process, with the first attacks starting in the 13th century, and then lasting all the way to their defeat by Egypt. Quote Encyclopedia Britannica "Sea People, any of the groups of aggressive seafarers who invaded eastern Anatolia, Syria, Palestine, Cyprus, and Egypt toward the end of the Bronze Age, especially in the 13th century bce. They are held responsible for the destruction of old powers such as the Hittite empire." Thanks for commenting! :)
American college students in the 1880's unknowingly tagged the Heti people of Hatusa with the name Hittites. In fact the Biblical Hittites had absolutely no relation with the Hati people's. The Hittites descended from Mizraim while the Heti descended from Heth.
@@classeontop7403 You don't even know who the Turks are probably? Hz. İbrahim, Hz. Musa, Hz. İsa(Jesus), Hz. Muhammed are all Turks not jew? Turks are the people of continent Mu. We Turks were already in Europe before your names Frank, German, Roman existed? The civilization bringers are Turks. Not Greeks or jews. The cradle of cicilization of the Sumerian Turks. - Gene D. Matlock - What Strange Mystery Unites the Turkish Nations, India, Catholicism, and Mexico?
@@classeontop7403 Hebrew has also not a predecessor. It is derived and learned and copied from the Turanian Turkic writing system. (Isaac Taylor - The Alphabet)
@@noahtylerpritchett2682 No to both of your answers. Modern DNA says what the world knew a long time ago. They are 100% Armenian. The only ones who match Hittites DNA are todays Armenians. Hittite could only be read by armenians because it was ancient armenien (Peter Jensen 130 yrs ago). But this armenians already knew long before that. Thank the Lord for modern technology. Now humanity needs to change all their fake history that has been only about themselfes while destroying Anunnaki to bring forth their own bs. Finally the truth is starting come up to the surface 🤙🏻.
@@islammehmeov2334 Not turk🤣🤣🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️. Mongol Turks have been there 1000 years. Armenians like historians have said/written about 500, 1000, 2000 yrs ago. Hittites have a waaaaay longer history than what the turks have stolen, identity/traditions/coffee etc etc and then calling it their own. Modern DNA is a 100%match between Hittites and Armenians. Turk 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️ pathetic. Stil lying and dishonest. Turning your face to please every one. Eventually you get caught with all those lies 🤣🤣🤙🏻
Polat Kaya: This citation states that: “The Hattic "Hattus" now became Hittite "Hattusa", and the king took the name of Hattusili I, the "one from Hattusa". I must note that, if the Hittite name HATTUSILI means “one from HATTUSA”, it means so because this word is a pure TURKISH word! This we see from the suffix “LI” at the end of the name HATTUSILI. The Turkish suffix “LI” means “from; of”. The name HATTUSİLİ is like present Turkish sayings such as ANKARALI, SİVASLI, KAYSERİLİ, etc. All of these mean “one from Ankara, one from Sivas, and one from Kayseri respectively. Please note that this does not mean that these people were different tribes with different languages. Thus, this HATTI word of some 4000 years ago is unquestionable evidence that the Hattians were Turkish speaking Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples - contrary to all kinds of mythological terms given in the Bible or anywhere else! Additionally, the name HITTITE, voiced as “HITTAYT”, is a modern concoction that is fabricated from a Turkish expression intended to replace the old Turanian word HATTI (KHATTI). In other words, the term HITTITEis an Aryanized form of the name HATTI. Actually, when we decipher the name HITTAYT (HITTITE) by rearranging its letters as “HATTI-TY”, we find that the term HITTITE is really the altered, restructured and alienated form of the Turkish name “HATTİ’Dİ” (HATTI İDİ) meaning “it was Hatti”. This alone indicates that the modern name HITTITE was concocted from the name HATTI into HITTITE. In other words, the original was Turanian AKHATETE (which has been “interpreted” as KHATTI) but the “scholars” who supposedly read these ancient KHATTIAN texts simply changed the name into HITTITE and claimed it as “Indo-European”! Thus, the so-called name HITTITE is another Aryan term fabricated from Turkish. The meaning of this is that the Hatti empire continued on as a HATTI empire but modern scholars changed the name HATTI to HITTITE and labelled the whole thing as an “Indo-European Empire” to suit their purposes (i.e., painting the ancient Turanian world as an Aryan and Jewish world). Such modern labelling, some 4000 years after the event, changes the history of ancient Anatolia artificially into an “Aryan” or “Indo-European” dominated land rather than a land that was populated by the native Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples. Since what they did has not been questioned all this time, what they throw in - stayed in - thus giving the impression that what they say was true some 4000 years ago. Continuous propaganda of their concocted falsehood - conditions the unquestioning public into concluding that there was an “Indo-European” Empire in the heart of Turanian Anatolia. The truth is that there was no “Indo-European” languages until the wanderer Aryan priests artificially fabricated them from the much older Turkish language. One example of this is the wanderer Semite priests fabricating “Accadian and Assyrian” languages from the much older Turko-Sumerian language. Recently we have another example of such falsehood stating that “All Indo-European languages originated from Anatolia”. The intensive media propaganda presentation of this so-called “linguistic research of the Indo-European languages” by means of some computer manipulations is well implanted in the minds of the public - as if what was said was the truth. Actually, they would have been speaking the truth if they had labelled their paper as “All Indo-European languages originated from the ancient Turanian language of Turkish”. Finally, I point the reader to Isaiah 65:17 where the sovereign lord Jehova (YHWA) has said: ‘FOR HERE I AM CREATING NEW HEAVENS AND A NEW EARTH; AND THE FORMER THINGS WILL NOT BE CALLED TO MIND, NEITHER WILL THEY COME UP INTO THE HEART.’ Translated into simple terms, this means “I AM ERASING FROM HISTORY THE ANCIENT TURANIAN WORLD AND INSTALLING IN ITS PLACE A SEMITIC WORLD”. But the later Aryans also took the same concept and ran with it - with the so-called Christianity! Polat Kaya 2013-07-05
This is a false informastion turks are came from central asia and majority of turks have central asian dna but anatolia is aryan indo-europian land wich belong to now days kurds
Modern DNA research indicates that many people who today call themselves Armenian descend from the most ancient Hittites. Or the DNA from skeletons found across Portasar and turkey have the same dna as todays Armenians. Turks have systemathicly destroyed and covered up armenians precence there witch is bery well known. The kingdom of Urartu, Ararat were among those that ruled the area. They are Armenians. A German named Peter Jensen wrote researched about this 130 yrs ago. Armenians where the only ones able to read/decipher and understand ancient Hittite carvings/texts etc etc. It was written in very old armenian and because they where armenians !!!!. Many have tried and almost succeded to erase or lie to get ride of Armenian, Babylon, greeks, Jews, turks, arabs, russis. Finally the truth comes out and puts an end to all humanitys lies and tries to erase the Armenian language. Mesrop brought back a language many nations have tried to forcefully erase troughout history.
@@aliklc1970 Hittites are not turks 🤣🤣🤣🤣.Who is telling you these lies ?!?!? You are pulling more shame over the turls by opening your mouth withput thinking. Its very simple. Mongol turks have been in Turkey 1000 yrs. Turks have trough out many 100s of years destroyed and covered up all evidence of others living in todays Turkey. On command from your parlament and the ones who pull the strings. All Modern DNA tests that was not possible not long ago made turkish government to start building lies upon lies. Thinking they would never get caught....But !!!! Thx to todays DNA technology the dna from skeletons in and around "Portasar" and many other places goes straigh back to todays armenians. Portasar excisted long before turks changed it to Gözbelitepe. Along with many greek, Armenian and other city names turks changed to their own. 100 evidance and proof excist you know outside of turkey 🤦🏻♂️.... Instead of keeping up "the turkish bs lies", come clean and really try to once since and for all make peace with each other. Hittites are 20000+ years old. Same dna as armenians. Turks where still in mongolia at that time. Thers is still and island close to greece but that belong to turkey where they still only speak Armenian today.....But good try 🤷🏻♂️🤙🏻
Turks came to Anatolia in the 11th century after Christ. Asia Minor was a Byzantine province, with highly percentage of Hellenic and Armenian populations. Hittite Empire declined already before 1000 Before Christ.
They are Armenians. Modern dag DNA tests have concluded a 100% match to todays armenians but this the world already knew. They changed it for their own gread.
The Battle of Kadesh between Ramses II of Egypt and the Hittite Empire is the first and most well documented battle in all of Egyptian History
The Battle of Kadesh is also the largest and most massive chariot battle in history with over 6000 chariots on both sides combined🔥🛷🔥
Hittites have also the very first peace treaty in history
**Ramses II**
@@youvebeengreeked ayo my bad nigga💀
@@SpeedDemon_Editzzz you good
@@youvebeengreeked 😁
need to re-do my battle of kadesh video :)
Hittites were some serious beat down folk ! Nice video !!
Correctiions for you:
1) The Hittites did not use iron weapons. They were a thoroughly Bronze Age culture. They did, however, seem to have a lot more iron than their neighbors, and used it to make prestige items.
2) It's "Hattusili", not "Hutusali". And there were three of them. It sounds like you're talking about Hattusili I (~1650~1620), who was the first significant conquering king of the Hittite Old Kingdom. If you wanted name a peak of the Hittite empire, it would probably be Mursili II (~1317~1293), because the extent of Hittite territory reached its peak under him. You could say that the Hittites reached the peak of their diplomatic power under Hattusili III (~1274~1249), who sealed the famous peace treaty with Rameses II of Egypt. (Which is actually the third treaty we know of that the Hittites sealed with Egypt.)
3) You would need to expand the territory map in order to show its extant so that it included most of northern Syria as far as the River Khabur in the east under Mursili's reign. You would probably also need to include those little gaps of territory on your map. In the south-west, Mursili controlled Millawanda, which is what that gap seems to mean. In the north-west, it's trickier. That was where the land of Pala was, but we don't know its extent, so we don't know if it included that area.
4) The attack of the Sea Peoples coalition occurred in the 12th, not 13th century BCE (1177 BCE). And their kingdom didn't begin its decline then, that is when it was destroyed.
thanks for commenting! heres my rebuttal :)
1. The Hittites are the oldest known civilization to use Iron, think theres an example of a dagger found around 2500BC. And from what we can gather they were known to be experimenting with the metal, being one of the first to not smelt iron from meteorites.
2. Yeah, i speak with quite a heavy Somerset/Bristolian accent, some words are just hard to say for me :)
3. It's a vague map, most history youtubers get around the whole "we don't actually know the full extent of the territory ruled by a certain nation by adding a blur to the borders. I think that looks a bit naff so i go for the solid white line. Technically i should have included Troy under Hittite rule, but again, its a vague map.
4. The sea peoples did not all attack at once, its a long drawn out process, with the first attacks starting in the 13th century, and then lasting all the way to their defeat by Egypt. Quote Encyclopedia Britannica "Sea People, any of the groups of aggressive seafarers who invaded eastern Anatolia, Syria, Palestine, Cyprus, and Egypt toward the end of the Bronze Age, especially in the 13th century bce. They are held responsible for the destruction of old powers such as the Hittite empire."
Thanks for commenting! :)
@@AncientHistoryGuy who destroy them were the dammed kaskas
This was quite informative, thanks!
Its nice to see you upload video's again
3:06 they had the cutest miniature camels did they not? 🧐
Interesting, I'd be interested in a deeper dive on this.
i have several videos on the hittites coming out soon :)
Ya cause they r never mentioned even my history teachers don’t know bout them
BCE?
good job bro
thankyou!
Relatives of the Pitchites maybe?
American college students in the 1880's unknowingly tagged the Heti people of Hatusa with the name Hittites. In fact the Biblical Hittites had absolutely no relation with the Hati people's. The Hittites descended from Mizraim while the Heti descended from Heth.
The term BCE is unacceptable. The term BC is the right one.
correct
HOUDREEHEE
How many fantastic comments fence similar between Turkesh and Armenia or lndoeuropian hello stop making fun and get your self educated Mach dip
😂armenians are liar
q errar q bush
Hittites is semitic not indo europe
Hittites were the Turks
YES 🇹🇷☪️❤️💪☝️
Turks only reached those lands in the 11th century when the Seljuks conquered Anatolia from the Greeks.
@@classeontop7403 You don't even know who the Turks are probably?
Hz. İbrahim, Hz. Musa, Hz. İsa(Jesus), Hz. Muhammed are all Turks not jew?
Turks are the people of continent Mu. We Turks were already in Europe before your names Frank, German, Roman existed?
The civilization bringers are Turks. Not Greeks or jews.
The cradle of cicilization of the Sumerian Turks.
- Gene D. Matlock - What Strange Mystery Unites the Turkish Nations, India, Catholicism, and Mexico?
@@classeontop7403 Hebrew has also not a predecessor. It is derived and learned and copied from the Turanian Turkic writing system.
(Isaac Taylor - The Alphabet)
@@classeontop7403 God blessed the Oğuz Turks above all families and nations on the earth. Not the jews?
Saying BCE instead of BC is so cringe
I agree!
Yes, it is. It's so pointless.
I disliked the video solely because of this
Ancestors of Cappadocian Greeks
Ancestors of everyone in Anatolia irregardless of how mix they are ethnically.
One drop rule.
@@noahtylerpritchett2682 No to both of your answers. Modern DNA says what the world knew a long time ago. They are 100% Armenian. The only ones who match Hittites DNA are todays Armenians. Hittite could only be read by armenians because it was ancient armenien (Peter Jensen 130 yrs ago). But this armenians already knew long before that. Thank the Lord for modern technology. Now humanity needs to change all their fake history that has been only about themselfes while destroying Anunnaki to bring forth their own bs. Finally the truth is starting come up to the surface 🤙🏻.
Georgians
Ancestors of TURKIS
@@islammehmeov2334 Not turk🤣🤣🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️. Mongol Turks have been there 1000 years. Armenians like historians have said/written about 500, 1000, 2000 yrs ago. Hittites have a waaaaay longer history than what the turks have stolen, identity/traditions/coffee etc etc and then calling it their own.
Modern DNA is a 100%match between Hittites and Armenians.
Turk 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️ pathetic. Stil lying and dishonest. Turning your face to please every one. Eventually you get caught with all those lies 🤣🤣🤙🏻
Polat Kaya: This citation states that: “The Hattic "Hattus" now became Hittite "Hattusa", and the king took the name of Hattusili I, the "one from Hattusa". I must note that, if the Hittite name HATTUSILI means “one from HATTUSA”, it means so because this word is a pure TURKISH word! This we see from the suffix “LI” at the end of the name HATTUSILI. The Turkish suffix “LI” means “from; of”. The name HATTUSİLİ is like present Turkish sayings such as ANKARALI, SİVASLI, KAYSERİLİ, etc. All of these mean “one from Ankara, one from Sivas, and one from Kayseri respectively. Please note that this does not mean that these people were different tribes with different languages. Thus, this HATTI word of some 4000 years ago is unquestionable evidence that the Hattians were Turkish speaking Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples - contrary to all kinds of mythological terms given in the Bible or anywhere else!
Additionally, the name HITTITE, voiced as “HITTAYT”, is a modern concoction that is fabricated from a Turkish expression intended to replace the old Turanian word HATTI (KHATTI). In other words, the term HITTITEis an Aryanized form of the name HATTI.
Actually, when we decipher the name HITTAYT (HITTITE) by rearranging its letters as “HATTI-TY”, we find that the term HITTITE is really the altered, restructured and alienated form of the Turkish name “HATTİ’Dİ” (HATTI İDİ) meaning “it was Hatti”. This alone indicates that the modern name HITTITE was concocted from the name HATTI into HITTITE. In other words, the original was Turanian AKHATETE (which has been “interpreted” as KHATTI) but the “scholars” who supposedly read these ancient KHATTIAN texts simply changed the name into HITTITE and claimed it as “Indo-European”! Thus, the so-called name HITTITE is another Aryan term fabricated from Turkish.
The meaning of this is that the Hatti empire continued on as a HATTI empire but modern scholars changed the name HATTI to HITTITE and labelled the whole thing as an “Indo-European Empire” to suit their purposes (i.e., painting the ancient Turanian world as an Aryan and Jewish world). Such modern labelling, some 4000 years after the event, changes the history of ancient Anatolia artificially into an “Aryan” or “Indo-European” dominated land rather than a land that was populated by the native Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples. Since what they did has not been questioned all this time, what they throw in - stayed in - thus giving the impression that what they say was true some 4000 years ago. Continuous propaganda of their concocted falsehood - conditions the unquestioning public into concluding that there was an “Indo-European” Empire in the heart of Turanian Anatolia. The truth is that there was no “Indo-European” languages until the wanderer Aryan priests artificially fabricated them from the much older Turkish language. One example of this is the wanderer Semite priests fabricating “Accadian and Assyrian” languages from the much older Turko-Sumerian language. Recently we have another example of such falsehood stating that “All Indo-European languages originated from Anatolia”. The intensive media propaganda presentation of this so-called “linguistic research of the Indo-European languages” by means of some computer manipulations is well implanted in the minds of the public - as if what was said was the truth. Actually, they would have been speaking the truth if they had labelled their paper as “All Indo-European languages originated from the ancient Turanian language of Turkish”.
Finally, I point the reader to Isaiah 65:17 where the sovereign lord Jehova (YHWA) has said: ‘FOR HERE I AM CREATING NEW HEAVENS AND A NEW EARTH; AND THE FORMER THINGS WILL NOT BE CALLED TO MIND, NEITHER WILL THEY COME UP INTO THE HEART.’
Translated into simple terms, this means “I AM ERASING FROM HISTORY THE ANCIENT TURANIAN WORLD AND INSTALLING IN ITS PLACE A SEMITIC WORLD”. But the later Aryans also took the same concept and ran with it - with the so-called Christianity!
Polat Kaya
2013-07-05
This is a false informastion turks are came from central asia and majority of turks have central asian dna but anatolia is aryan indo-europian land wich belong to now days kurds
Modern DNA research indicates that many people who today call themselves Armenian descend from the most ancient Hittites. Or the DNA from skeletons found across Portasar and turkey have the same dna as todays Armenians. Turks have systemathicly destroyed and covered up armenians precence there witch is bery well known. The kingdom of Urartu, Ararat were among those that ruled the area.
They are Armenians.
A German named Peter Jensen wrote researched about this 130 yrs ago. Armenians where the only ones able to read/decipher and understand ancient Hittite carvings/texts etc etc. It was written in very old armenian and because they where armenians !!!!. Many have tried and almost succeded to erase or lie to get ride of Armenian, Babylon, greeks, Jews, turks, arabs, russis.
Finally the truth comes out and puts an end to all humanitys lies and tries to erase the Armenian language. Mesrop brought back a language many nations have tried to forcefully erase troughout history.
Hittites are Turks Urartu Hurrians are armenians
You are liar Anatolian Turks and Anatolian Greeks have Hittite Luwian Lydian etc DNA lol
@@aliklc1970 Hittites are not turks 🤣🤣🤣🤣.Who is telling you these lies ?!?!? You are pulling more shame over the turls by opening your mouth withput thinking. Its very simple. Mongol turks have been in Turkey 1000 yrs. Turks have trough out many 100s of years destroyed and covered up all evidence of others living in todays Turkey. On command from your parlament and the ones who pull the strings. All Modern DNA tests that was not possible not long ago made turkish government to start building lies upon lies. Thinking they would never get caught....But !!!! Thx to todays DNA technology the dna from skeletons in and around "Portasar" and many other places goes straigh back to todays armenians. Portasar excisted long before turks changed it to Gözbelitepe. Along with many greek, Armenian and other city names turks changed to their own. 100 evidance and proof excist you know outside of turkey 🤦🏻♂️.... Instead of keeping up "the turkish bs lies", come clean and really try to once since and for all make peace with each other.
Hittites are 20000+ years old. Same dna as armenians. Turks where still in mongolia at that time. Thers is still and island close to greece but that belong to turkey where they still only speak Armenian today.....But good try 🤷🏻♂️🤙🏻
Soo they were turks
Turks came to Anatolia in the 11th century after Christ. Asia Minor was a Byzantine province, with highly percentage of Hellenic and Armenian populations. Hittite Empire declined already before 1000 Before Christ.
not even close
They are Armenians. Modern dag DNA tests have concluded a 100% match to todays armenians but this the world already knew. They changed it for their own gread.
😂😂
@@Nac-Soc-Geo And Georgia got their alfabeth from them as well. Ignorance is high i see 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤙🏻