I tend to be very charitable in my reviews. So long as I don't spit it out in disgust or feel I got ripped off paying for something way overpriced, I tend to go by the Ebert method of reviewing movies, where I review within the context of what it is, otherwise most NA beer reviews would be "this tastes like nothing compared to the real thing" with said real thing not being all that great to begin with in the bigger picture of things.
@@lautreamontg True. Beer has to be judged as it is, for what it was intended to be. I miss Ebert. I loved watching him and Siskel get into things on PBS. I also used to buy his yearbook each year. The man was a fluent and interesting writer.
Drinkable is ... okay. Have not seen this one here yet.
I tend to be very charitable in my reviews. So long as I don't spit it out in disgust or feel I got ripped off paying for something way overpriced, I tend to go by the Ebert method of reviewing movies, where I review within the context of what it is, otherwise most NA beer reviews would be "this tastes like nothing compared to the real thing" with said real thing not being all that great to begin with in the bigger picture of things.
@@lautreamontg True. Beer has to be judged as it is, for what it was intended to be. I miss Ebert. I loved watching him and Siskel get into things on PBS. I also used to buy his yearbook each year. The man was a fluent and interesting writer.