There are some hundred reasons that it's insane. Juts to point to one of them: if those chromosomes all come from Mary, then Jesus would have been a woman.
According to the bible, Jesus wandered for three years, preaching and teaching. He must have taken a dump under a lot of bushes in that time. I wonder why archeologists haven't found any of them yet? They would quite literally be holy sh1t.
Don't forget being the son of a supreme being he would have had a lot of knowledge at his disposele so he would have been able to write down all his thoughts and morals as well as his recipes for changing water into wine, increasing the number of objects and other things that weren't written down about. If so what he wrote on would have been made indestructible and still with us to this day - who ever held and looked at the parchment or such would be able to read and understand it in their language, still waiting for that to be found - like the Dark Hold in the TV series MARVEL Agents of SHIELD
@@tussk. early church tradition said he was too holy to defecate or urinate because he only ate and drank exactly as much as was needed. Same thing was said about Mary, his mom. Either you believe everything or you realize some of it can’t be true. 😉
Yeah, that is a stretch. There was one infamous arrest of a cat killer, and there are numerous reports of waterfoul (which are federally protected) being illegally harvested from public parks, but there are no credible reports of cats and dogs being eaten afaik.
@k98killer My husband saw a story about the water fowl, and therefore, he thinks the claim about pets is plausible. You may pity me; both my husband and son are susceptible to conspiracy theories 😢.
@@IheartDogs55 more of a rumor than a conspiracy theory at this point. You can upgrade it to a conspiracy theory by adding something about the ominous "they" who do things in the shadows -- maybe the billionaire elites have dandruff allergies or something lol
@@IheartDogs55 Try this on them: There's always one (aka a single sparrow does not make a summer). If one of their relatives is a billionaire and another did something like sexually molest waterfowl, does it make your husband and son billionaire waterfowl molesters? Do we need to keep them away from the ducks in the park?
I do admire her asking whether it's a prank and "If this is so, why isn't it in the news?" It's a baby step, but at least she's questioning the claims.
Her comment "Jesus was only half-human": This is contrary to Christian orthodoxy which holds that Jesus was wholly (fully) human AND wholly (fully) God. Yeah, I know the whole thing was Wyatt bs, but what a fail to try and prove Jesus' existence and at the same time deny a fundamental doctrine of Christianity (Hypostatic union).
The problem here is that this is not a fundamental doctrine of christianity. It is a fundamental doctrine of most modern christians. But the entire conceit is a post Biblical development. How much you value it depends entirely on how much you value the opinion of a bunch of dudes who never so much as met someone who might have known Jesus. Her comment was in no way a failure unless she professes to buy into the premise of hypostatic union, which, I didn't see any evidence of here. Given that she buys into claims made by Ron Wyatt, I'd say that she likely doesn't share many views with so called orthodoxy.
@iwilldi I don't know how you can say In Mark when his Gospel is only about Jesus' ministry and death. There's no virgin birth. Only Matthew and Luke talk about his birth. Mark, John the Letters, and revelation don't care at all about his birth or early life, but his ministry, death, and post resurrection.
@@mattd398 8 years of daily reading of Mark brought me to that point. For instance in Mark Jesus never says my/our father, and Mark as a narrator also never uses god or lord. But there are more than one voices claiming _you are my son_
@iwilldi Yeah, I don't believe Jesus is God, but Jesus is called Lord, particularly in the scene of the sabbath, the son of man has Lord even over the Sabbath. And he prays dirextly to his Father in Gethsemane, to God. Other than that, I agree.
I found Jesus' blood when my friend's roommate cut himself opening a pack of chocolate chips with a knife while baking cookies. I helped clean it up and he got stitches. Still has the scar, and I told the story to his now-husband. We still laugh that chocolate really is trying to kill him.
Lying for Jesus has always been a *thing* in Christian fundamentalism. They are walking defense mechanisms, pontificating to skeptics about FAITH as "evidence of things not seen" (Hebrews 11) and yet they desperately latch onto any claims of physical evidence (no matter how ridiculous) for the existence of Jesus or other biblical figures.
@@paulmartin1971 I didn't evolve from anything else. I was born fully formed into what the human genome represents in its current state through millions of years of evolutionary pressures. Humans, like our nearest cousins, chimpanzees and bonobos (of which we share 98%+ genetic history) had a common ancestor whether you like it or not. As for creation ex nihilo, just because science doesn't have all the answers to every question does not mean you get to claim *God did it* by default. Before we can begin to have an intelligent argument (and there ARE), the history of everything is that complexity derives from simpler forms, not the reverse. So to impose a god (which god, exactly, would that be?) as a complex entity you must explain what caused that entity to exist. Good luck with that.
I had someone tell me a similar thing about the Shroud of Turin, that they had tested the blood on it and it had half the chromosome count. I told him that's not how genetics work and just ends up with genetic problems.
Thank you. This was confusing me; I’ve never heard the term “living blood”. It’s fluids with some cells in it. I kept trying to parse out if she meant it hadn’t coagulated/dried out
I've heard this "blood is still alive" thing and it sounds so horrific. Is there a collection of dust containing Jesus' still living skin cells? Did all of his lost blood spring to life when he resurrected? Is the ground beneath Gethsemane pooling with Jesus' still living sweat and blood? Do his living blood cells still divide? Is there more blood than when he first bleed out? There are so many implications that go along with finding a pool of immortal blood.
I am a famed archeologist with a phd from the Ron Wyatt School of Legit Archeology. I got it with a stunning discovery just yesterday, when I pointed at one tree through the window of my flat and discovered it was the one with the forbidden fruit stuff. It blew everyone's mind.
In the middle....of the battle field we find King Cyrus, mayhaps we start there. The rumor of war, bright certain peoples together. In order to preserve the word. What was ratified was a work of Constantine.
There was an actual novel series on this premise 20ish years ago, the Christ Clone Trilogy. They get the genetic material to clone Jesus from....the Shroud of Turin. 😂
@@digitaljanus And then they train the clones to be J Wickers! Miraculously skilled assassins who cannot be stopped by Death.Itself. {cue theater music}
I was a sheltered Christian kid and I believed some things that require a non-negligible amount of gullibility to believe... but once I started trying to beef up my apologetic chops to show off my big brain and demonstrate my sexual market value to them youth group hoes, I quickly realized I must have stumbled into the wrong saloon and "excuse me" , "very sorry" apologized my way out of there ... I didn't make 18 as a professing Christian.
Hey i’m replying here cuz it seems my replies won’t go through on the other comment section, regardless you're right my apologies for insulting. However, when it comes to your argument, the way YOU interpret it HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT IT MEANS. You simply cannot divorce these texts with the context of the verses. These texts are very explicit, if you read the books they come from it gets even clearer. "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." "Thomas answered him, 'My Lord and my God!'" "For in him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily." "Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped." "But of the Son he says, 'Your throne, O God, is forever and ever, the scepter of uprightness is the scepter of your kingdom.'" "To them belong the patriarchs, and from their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ, who is God over all, blessed forever. Amen.". Nor can you divorce it from the contemporary works of their time and early church, Ignatious, Justin Martyr, Clement of Rome all express clearly Christ diety. But this is simply a tangent that you went on to make the dumb claim that Jesus is not God in the biblical literature, the original topic was how God cannot change, again which I already explained. (Edit: Jews and Israelites did have a notion of the trinity and diversity in God, this is known as the "two powers in heaven", and also expressed in many theophanies.
@@BuffAle There can't be a more explicit text that the one where Jesus denies the knowledge of the hour. But let's see the context, because just mentioning 'context' is not an argument. For example, what's the context for ""In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."" What's the context that makes you deduce that the word is Jesus? You are selecting dubious translations: even the KJV uses 'Godhead' and not 'God'. Modern translations uses 'deity'. And you forgot to include the very next sentence: "and you have come to fullness in him," that extends the comparation between Jesus and God with Jesus and men, making clear that we are talking about communion, not identity. Please don't use the context excuse again, if you are the only one quote mining the Bible. Of course the fathers of the church make their own interpretation: they were the fathers of the church, after all. If you think the argument is dumb, tell that to modern scholars, and don't forget to remind Jewish people that Christians know better than them how to interpret the texts that they wrote.
@@juanausensi499 First of all the church fathers are contemporary sources for interpretations of the text, they had direct access to the authors who created the texts, what makes your interpretation better than theirs? Secondly, The verse about the hour I already explained, he knows not as it pertains to his human nature, when “only the father” is used it implies the divine son as well, Acts further shows that Jesus does know the hour after the ressurection. Secondly yes analyze the context that verse is from John, John beings ascribing the word to be God, and if you read further, “the word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld his glory, the glory of the one and only son” It’s clearly the Son who is God, this is in all translations not just the KJV, you accuse me of quote mining when I have given you plethora of verses and contemporary christian’s who all view it the same way, yet you insist Jesus was not thought of as God nor does the New Testament teach so, you base your entire argument on a teaspoon of verses out of context. So it clearly shows your lack of knowledge, I don’t have time to argue with uneducated people like you sorry but this is my last reply.
@juanausensi499 First of all the church fathers are contemporary sources for interpretations of the text, they had direct access to the authors who created the texts, what makes your interpretation better than theirs? Secondly, The verse about the hour I already explained, he knows not as it pertains to his human nature, when “only the father” is used it implies the divine son as well, Acts further shows that Jesus does know the hour after the ressurection. Secondly yes analyze the context that verse is from John, John beings ascribing the word to be God, and if you read further, “the word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld his glory, the glory of the one and only son” It’s clearly the Son who is God, this is in all translations not just the KJV, you accuse me of quote mining when I have given you plethora of verses and contemporary christian’s who all view it the same way, yet you insist Jesus was not thought of as God nor does the New Testament teach so, you base your entire argument on a teaspoon of verses out of context. So it clearly shows your lack of knowledge, I don’t have time to argue with uneducated people like you sorry but this is my last reply. edit: the sentence after John 1:1 never says men are in communion with God in the same way, John 1:2 “he was with Gid in the beginning” I don’t know where you’re getting the other sentence from check your sources bud, and no modern translation changes “God” to diety, even if it did this still means Jesus was a diety 😂
“Is this fake news? Maybe I’m being pranked?” YES. Yes, you are. And I am not going to make a blonde joke because I’m trying real hard to be a better person.
Yeah, her "my mind is blown" statement led me to think some uncharitable thoughts. Edit: Thoughts that had nothing to do with her gender or the color of her hair, just to be clear. They are the same thoughts I've had about many of the people Dan has stitched.
Fun fact- I sat and talked to Ron about this (and other) discoveries while he was still alive. I had a friend accompany him on a tour of Turkey and Israel. Even with all the “first hand accounts”, I have never been convinced. He really was persuasive, but he was always short on documentation. I miss him as a friend. He was still wrong.
@@juanausensi499 there was always something that kept him from showing other people his findings. The pictures were too blurry for the Ark of the Covenant, the Saudi’s put a tall fence around Sinai, the lab results for the blood were under seal, the Red Sea crossing monument on the Egyptian side was chopped down and stolen, etc…
@@juanausensi499 I believe he liked being important and having people look up to him. He toured regularly and spoke all across the country. He ultimately lost his home church and a first marriage due to his “radical” beliefs.
I hate it when Dan spoils the outcome of the video in the title. I couldn't watch the video while wondering if "Maybe archaeologists DID discover Jesus' blood?" 🤣
Good lord (pun intended) I've been hearing these Ron Wyatt lies for almost all my life. It just goes to show that as long as it fits your narrative and identity politics, you believe anything without a shred or evidence or research.
It's difficult to believe that any of these Christian content creators care about whether their claims have any basis in truth. Which I find ironic, because they claim to have found the "truth".
Blood from the Eucharist had only half the chromesomes to when it turned to flesh by a mircale confirmed by the current sitting pope. I told you so now you know.. I know you will still reject it but you can't say someone didn't tell youi.
Unrelated to this video (but trying to find a more direct way to get in touch is difficult).. Dan...can you please.. PLEASE do some mythbusting of the claims of the dude on the KingdomInContext channel? The dude speaks as if he is an authority, but in such an arrogant way that it makes it clear he's really just a religious bully.
Even if a haploid human, one with a single set of 23 chromosomes, could gestate and survive to birth, this one would have been female as Mary doesn’t have the gene to trigger male development. And, before you say God would have just added in the trigger, then why would He have not given an entire set of 23 chromosomes so he would have a proper complement of 46?
Why is she making a video while putting on makeup? Like, are you going somewhere and thought, “damn it, I HAVE to make this video about a fake religious discovery RIGHT NOW, but I’m late for work.”
Only having 23 chromosomes would be incredibly bad for Jesus' health and have a bunch of weird consequences this creator likely hasn't thought of. Two of those 46 chromosomes are either an XX pair or an XY pair (barring those rare instances where people have more chromosomes than usual), and if there's only 23 either he's missing some other chromosome so he can fit both X and Y in (which would reeeeaaaally suck for Jesus, as he'd be missing some pretty critical gene content), or he's only got one X chromosome (which according to the kind of people who spread this nonsense around would make Jesus a woman, and also not be great for his health). Combine that with only having half the chromosome pairs for the other 22, and you'd really want Mary to have no lurking recessive genetic issues. It'd also mean that God the Father is not male according to the kind of people who reduce gender to genetics. It'd also mean that genetic testing would make him not the father.
Who says she's even a Christian:??? Christians have been putting out videos debunking Wyatt for years now. But you like Dan's comic book shirts. DAN likes low hanging fruit videos to criticize .
You guys never refute claims with scripture or refute the actual facts present you just character assassinate and slander. I seriously don't understand what goes on your minds where you don't look at evidence but just what other people said about the evidence... So frustrating.
what evidence are you offering for your claims? you claim to be a scholar. what are your academic credentials? why should people believe you? All you do is contradict other people's findings. I notice you never claim to be a Christian. are you?
What is it with commentary being done while putting on makeup? They can't be bothered to put on their make-up and _then_ record the video? So they have such little respect for their audience?
Of all the crazy things Ron claimed, the blood with 23 chromosomes is the most insane.
There are some hundred reasons that it's insane. Juts to point to one of them: if those chromosomes all come from Mary, then Jesus would have been a woman.
Melons and snails have 23 chromosomes.
Praise the Lord Jesus Cantaloupe
@juanausensi499 Actually, the sperm is what determines biological sex.
@@IheartDogs55 That's right, but it looks like there was no sperm involved, so no means to obtain a 'Y' chromosome.
@@juanausensi499 Got it. Thanks.
Ron Wyatt was the previous generation's My Pillow guy.
There've been a few, huh?
"They're killing babies after they're born!"
"Gee Idk, am I being pranked?" 🤔
According to the bible, Jesus wandered for three years, preaching and teaching. He must have taken a dump under a lot of bushes in that time. I wonder why archeologists haven't found any of them yet? They would quite literally be holy sh1t.
I wonder if they would be half a dump since, as she says, he's only half human.
Live Jesus shit-cultures! Jesus!?!?
Don't forget being the son of a supreme being he would have had a lot of knowledge at his disposele so he would have been able to write down all his thoughts and morals as well as his recipes for changing water into wine, increasing the number of objects and other things that weren't written down about. If so what he wrote on would have been made indestructible and still with us to this day - who ever held and looked at the parchment or such would be able to read and understand it in their language, still waiting for that to be found - like the Dark Hold in the TV series MARVEL Agents of SHIELD
We'd probably find some at the site of Golgotha, where many of the crucified vacated their bowels, according to the Kevin Smith documentary _Dogma_ .
@@tussk. early church tradition said he was too holy to defecate or urinate because he only ate and drank exactly as much as was needed. Same thing was said about Mary, his mom.
Either you believe everything or you realize some of it can’t be true. 😉
Maybe you should add a “Think critically and Google competently” shirt to your store
In the past he mentioned something about trademark issues using google
Btw it was in the store once, and I got it. Google is spelled G**gle.
@@mitchkohl1 He could always change it to "Think critically and research competently". Same take with no trademark issues.
@kalinystazvoruna8702 totally agree. Just was explaining why
Id buy it
@@kalinystazvoruna8702 Also, Google is increasingly enshittifying so it's best to broaden one's research tools.
Ah yes the Ron Wyatt special.
Ron W-uUUUTTT???!!
A foot'mouth long he-lie dog withslaw for thee but not for me?
Same claim like immigrants eating peoples dogs and cats. 😂
Yeah, that is a stretch. There was one infamous arrest of a cat killer, and there are numerous reports of waterfoul (which are federally protected) being illegally harvested from public parks, but there are no credible reports of cats and dogs being eaten afaik.
@k98killer My husband saw a story about the water fowl, and therefore, he thinks the claim about pets is plausible. You may pity me; both my husband and son are susceptible to conspiracy theories 😢.
@@IheartDogs55 more of a rumor than a conspiracy theory at this point. You can upgrade it to a conspiracy theory by adding something about the ominous "they" who do things in the shadows -- maybe the billionaire elites have dandruff allergies or something lol
@@IheartDogs55 Try this on them:
There's always one (aka a single sparrow does not make a summer). If one of their relatives is a billionaire and another did something like sexually molest waterfowl, does it make your husband and son billionaire waterfowl molesters? Do we need to keep them away from the ducks in the park?
_They're eating the dogs!_
Maybe they can't find any hamberders.
Gullibility is a hell of a drug.
From The Prestige, "The audience wants to be fooled."
Why am I just now hearing of this? This is some good, clean fun!
I do admire her asking whether it's a prank and "If this is so, why isn't it in the news?" It's a baby step, but at least she's questioning the claims.
Her comment "Jesus was only half-human": This is contrary to Christian orthodoxy which holds that Jesus was wholly (fully) human AND wholly (fully) God. Yeah, I know the whole thing was Wyatt bs, but what a fail to try and prove Jesus' existence and at the same time deny a fundamental doctrine of Christianity (Hypostatic union).
In Mark our first phantasy about Jesus, Jesus has conspicously no father, or too many fathers. pick your poison.
The problem here is that this is not a fundamental doctrine of christianity.
It is a fundamental doctrine of most modern christians. But the entire conceit is a post Biblical development. How much you value it depends entirely on how much you value the opinion of a bunch of dudes who never so much as met someone who might have known Jesus.
Her comment was in no way a failure unless she professes to buy into the premise of hypostatic union, which, I didn't see any evidence of here. Given that she buys into claims made by Ron Wyatt, I'd say that she likely doesn't share many views with so called orthodoxy.
@iwilldi
I don't know how you can say In Mark when his Gospel is only about Jesus' ministry and death. There's no virgin birth. Only Matthew and Luke talk about his birth. Mark, John the Letters, and revelation don't care at all about his birth or early life, but his ministry, death, and post resurrection.
@@mattd398
8 years of daily reading of Mark brought me to that point.
For instance in Mark Jesus never says my/our father, and Mark as a narrator also never uses god or lord. But there are more than one voices claiming _you are my son_
@iwilldi
Yeah, I don't believe Jesus is God, but Jesus is called Lord, particularly in the scene of the sabbath, the son of man has Lord even over the Sabbath. And he prays dirextly to his Father in Gethsemane, to God. Other than that, I agree.
It's like some people think (I use that word loosely) that knowledge of the world only started at the beginning of social media. Sheesh.
They get so many questions that they just have a form letter they pass out. This is a great example of how embedded in our minds a lie can be.
Ron Wyatt “archaeologist” 😂
As the Doctor's companions pointed out, he would point and laugh at them.
"Our keyhole o' gee"
Ron Wyatt... Malarchaeologist
Funny that she was smart enough to suspect that she might have gotten pranked but not smart enough to realize that she actually was pranked
Thanks Dan. ❤
So that's Anno Domini Park, filled with cloned Jesuses ruled out then?!
😂
Even Answers in Genesis refutes Ron Wyatt’s claims and calls him a fraud.
Ron Wyatt’s work confirmed true because AiG is always wrong
Such as?
@@MrBadway_636 are you asking what Ron Wyatt’s other claims are? Or are you asking which of his claims AiG calls a fraud?
@@Salamander_falls
Sponge-bob: “Even Answers in Genesis refutes Ron Wyatt’s claims and calls him a fraud.“
My question: such as?
@@MrBadway_636jfc. You are 12 gallons of stupid in a 10 gallon hat.
There is an ancient tree house in my neighborhood made from pieces of the true cross
I found Jesus' blood when my friend's roommate cut himself opening a pack of chocolate chips with a knife while baking cookies.
I helped clean it up and he got stitches. Still has the scar, and I told the story to his now-husband.
We still laugh that chocolate really is trying to kill him.
Lying for Jesus has always been a *thing* in Christian fundamentalism. They are walking defense mechanisms, pontificating to skeptics about FAITH as "evidence of things not seen" (Hebrews 11) and yet they desperately latch onto any claims of physical evidence (no matter how ridiculous) for the existence of Jesus or other biblical figures.
I'm guessing you believe that nothing created everything, and you evolved from something else. good luck with that.
@@paulmartin1971 I didn't evolve from anything else. I was born fully formed into what the human genome represents in its current state through millions of years of evolutionary pressures. Humans, like our nearest cousins, chimpanzees and bonobos (of which we share 98%+ genetic history) had a common ancestor whether you like it or not. As for creation ex nihilo, just because science doesn't have all the answers to every question does not mean you get to claim *God did it* by default. Before we can begin to have an intelligent argument (and there ARE), the history of everything is that complexity derives from simpler forms, not the reverse. So to impose a god (which god, exactly, would that be?) as a complex entity you must explain what caused that entity to exist. Good luck with that.
I feel old that I've never made a TikTok asking about something I can Google.
I had someone tell me a similar thing about the Shroud of Turin, that they had tested the blood on it and it had half the chromosome count. I told him that's not how genetics work and just ends up with genetic problems.
Ron Liatt
I can hear Darkmatter2525's line in my mind: "if the truth is on your side, why lie?"
If they are talking about the cells in blood sure, but blood as a whole is no more alive than the sea is alive.
As an aside, red blood cells have no nucleus, meaning they can't reproduce and will die after a fairly short time.
Thank you. This was confusing me; I’ve never heard the term “living blood”. It’s fluids with some cells in it. I kept trying to parse out if she meant it hadn’t coagulated/dried out
It was liquid, and didn't get washed away by two millennia of rain. Stunning claim
We have Jesus's lood and chromosomes. So we can clone God, I guess.
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ thanks Dan!!!
I've heard this "blood is still alive" thing and it sounds so horrific. Is there a collection of dust containing Jesus' still living skin cells? Did all of his lost blood spring to life when he resurrected? Is the ground beneath Gethsemane pooling with Jesus' still living sweat and blood? Do his living blood cells still divide? Is there more blood than when he first bleed out? There are so many implications that go along with finding a pool of immortal blood.
This sounds like a good idea for a creepypasta
I am a famed archeologist with a phd from the Ron Wyatt School of Legit Archeology. I got it with a stunning discovery just yesterday, when I pointed at one tree through the window of my flat and discovered it was the one with the forbidden fruit stuff. It blew everyone's mind.
Also, the Garden Tomb is FAR from confirmed as Jesus' burial place. It's just a place that Protestants could get control over.
Heh, how convenient.
Also the wrong era. It's First temple period not Second .
This poor woman. Actually this is sad for the entire Human Race
She must buy a lot of bridges.
"Think critically, Google competently..." and research at a brick & mortar library once in a while.
Man, I never even heard of this one
So Jesus only has an X Chromosome?
Appropriate, no?
That would also make him at least appear to be a woman
But, Jesus presented as a man and used male pronouns which clearly means Jesus was transgender.
@@keith6706 Allegedly, Jesus was so nonbinary that they identified as a Trinity.
@@lnsflare1I'm definitely stealing that one 😂
Critical thinking is faiths Kryptonite.
In the middle....of the battle field we find King Cyrus, mayhaps we start there. The rumor of war, bright certain peoples together. In order to preserve the word. What was ratified was a work of Constantine.
But if we did find his blood, would we be able to clone him?!
_Gethsemane Park:_ Blessed Are the Ass Kickers
🤣
@@kalinystazvoruna8702 😉
There was an actual novel series on this premise 20ish years ago, the Christ Clone Trilogy. They get the genetic material to clone Jesus from....the Shroud of Turin. 😂
@@digitaljanus And then they train the clones to be J Wickers! Miraculously skilled assassins who cannot be stopped by Death.Itself. {cue theater music}
Maybe God told him this, but God didn't tell me to believe him. Impasse.
You get sucked into the lie you want to believe.
I like to think that if, i was a Christian, i wouldn't be that gullible.
Doesn't it occur to them that someone on their own side can sometimes lie?
I was a sheltered Christian kid and I believed some things that require a non-negligible amount of gullibility to believe... but once I started trying to beef up my apologetic chops to show off my big brain and demonstrate my sexual market value to them youth group hoes, I quickly realized I must have stumbled into the wrong saloon and "excuse me" , "very sorry" apologized my way out of there ...
I didn't make 18 as a professing Christian.
Hey i’m replying here cuz it seems my replies won’t go through on the other comment section, regardless you're right my apologies for insulting. However, when it comes to your argument, the way YOU interpret it HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT IT MEANS. You simply cannot divorce these texts with the context of the verses. These texts are very explicit, if you read the books they come from it gets even clearer. "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." "Thomas answered him, 'My Lord and my God!'" "For in him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily." "Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped." "But of the Son he says, 'Your throne, O God, is forever and ever, the scepter of uprightness is the scepter of your kingdom.'" "To them belong the patriarchs, and from their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ, who is God over all, blessed forever. Amen.". Nor can you divorce it from the contemporary works of their time and early church, Ignatious, Justin Martyr, Clement of Rome all express clearly Christ diety. But this is simply a tangent that you went on to make the dumb claim that Jesus is not God in the biblical literature, the original topic was how God cannot change, again which I already explained. (Edit: Jews and Israelites did have a notion of the trinity and diversity in God, this is known as the "two powers in heaven", and also expressed in many theophanies.
@@BuffAle There can't be a more explicit text that the one where Jesus denies the knowledge of the hour. But let's see the context, because just mentioning 'context' is not an argument. For example, what's the context for ""In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."" What's the context that makes you deduce that the word is Jesus?
You are selecting dubious translations: even the KJV uses 'Godhead' and not 'God'. Modern translations uses 'deity'. And you forgot to include the very next sentence: "and you have come to fullness in him," that extends the comparation between Jesus and God with Jesus and men, making clear that we are talking about communion, not identity. Please don't use the context excuse again, if you are the only one quote mining the Bible.
Of course the fathers of the church make their own interpretation: they were the fathers of the church, after all.
If you think the argument is dumb, tell that to modern scholars, and don't forget to remind Jewish people that Christians know better than them how to interpret the texts that they wrote.
@@juanausensi499 First of all the church fathers are contemporary sources for interpretations of the text, they had direct access to the authors who created the texts, what makes your interpretation better than theirs? Secondly, The verse about the hour I already explained, he knows not as it pertains to his human nature, when “only the father” is used it implies the divine son as well, Acts further shows that Jesus does know the hour after the ressurection. Secondly yes analyze the context that verse is from John, John beings ascribing the word to be God, and if you read further, “the word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld his glory, the glory of the one and only son” It’s clearly the Son who is God, this is in all translations not just the KJV, you accuse me of quote mining when I have given you plethora of verses and contemporary christian’s who all view it the same way, yet you insist Jesus was not thought of as God nor does the New Testament teach so, you base your entire argument on a teaspoon of verses out of context. So it clearly shows your lack of knowledge, I don’t have time to argue with uneducated people like you sorry but this is my last reply.
@juanausensi499 First of all the church fathers are contemporary sources for interpretations of the text, they had direct access to the authors who created the texts, what makes your interpretation better than theirs? Secondly, The verse about the hour I already explained, he knows not as it pertains to his human nature, when “only the father” is used it implies the divine son as well, Acts further shows that Jesus does know the hour after the ressurection. Secondly yes analyze the context that verse is from John, John beings ascribing the word to be God, and if you read further, “the word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld his glory, the glory of the one and only son” It’s clearly the Son who is God, this is in all translations not just the KJV, you accuse me of quote mining when I have given you plethora of verses and contemporary christian’s who all view it the same way, yet you insist Jesus was not thought of as God nor does the New Testament teach so, you base your entire argument on a teaspoon of verses out of context. So it clearly shows your lack of knowledge, I don’t have time to argue with uneducated people like you sorry but this is my last reply. edit: the sentence after John 1:1 never says men are in communion with God in the same way, John 1:2 “he was with Gid in the beginning” I don’t know where you’re getting the other sentence from check your sources bud, and no modern translation changes “God” to diety, even if it did this still means Jesus was a diety 😂
“Is this fake news? Maybe I’m being pranked?”
YES. Yes, you are.
And I am not going to make a blonde joke because I’m trying real hard to be a better person.
At least she knew enough to ask "Hey, this is highly improbable. I'm gonna talk about it... but it's still highly improbable."
It's not really a prank, though. The "need to believe" is a helluva drug.
Just say no, kids🚫😂
Yeah, her "my mind is blown" statement led me to think some uncharitable thoughts. Edit: Thoughts that had nothing to do with her gender or the color of her hair, just to be clear. They are the same thoughts I've had about many of the people Dan has stitched.
It's a con, not a prank.
Ha, Ron Wyatt! Called it!
But I thought he found 24 chromosomes...
What would they compare the blood to?
I discovered the Easter Bunny s blood all hail the Almighty Bunny
Fun fact- I sat and talked to Ron about this (and other) discoveries while he was still alive. I had a friend accompany him on a tour of Turkey and Israel. Even with all the “first hand accounts”, I have never been convinced. He really was persuasive, but he was always short on documentation.
I miss him as a friend. He was still wrong.
What was his problem, exactly?
@@juanausensi499 Narcissism?
@@juanausensi499 there was always something that kept him from showing other people his findings.
The pictures were too blurry for the Ark of the Covenant, the Saudi’s put a tall fence around Sinai, the lab results for the blood were under seal, the Red Sea crossing monument on the Egyptian side was chopped down and stolen, etc…
@@UplandJones1 I understand, but what was his motivation?
@@juanausensi499 I believe he liked being important and having people look up to him. He toured regularly and spoke all across the country.
He ultimately lost his home church and a first marriage due to his “radical” beliefs.
What about the shroud of Turin ? ....blood stains and all
I hate it when Dan spoils the outcome of the video in the title. I couldn't watch the video while wondering if "Maybe archaeologists DID discover Jesus' blood?" 🤣
What’s your take on Gematria ?
Or any historical evidence
But we must have faith that Ron did the work of God like no man before or since. :)
Good lord (pun intended) I've been hearing these Ron Wyatt lies for almost all my life. It just goes to show that as long as it fits your narrative and identity politics, you believe anything without a shred or evidence or research.
Was Ron Wyatt the guy who claimed to find nephilim giant bones too?
Um can we just agree that the whole blood obsession is just gross and weird?
Blood that is alive outside the body ?
John Carpenter's " The Thing " ?
That's how they tested if the blood was still alive, with a hot wire.
Personally, I liked the original version better.
@@kalinystazvoruna8702 👍👍👍👍
A Classic In Its Own Right
And Actually A Different Genre
Not Ron Wyatt again?
FFS.
I have to break some bad news to you.........YES, you have been planked!!!
It's difficult to believe that any of these Christian content creators care about whether their claims have any basis in truth. Which I find ironic, because they claim to have found the "truth".
I thank you so much Dan, you are my number 1 source to use to convert Mormons out of that heretical church that you are part of.
Heresy is but a contrivance of dogma.
Isn't it embarrassing to be this juvenile?
Where do people come up with this sh**?!
Out of their... nether regions which is where their brains are.
Blood from the Eucharist had only half the chromesomes to when it turned to flesh by a mircale confirmed by the current sitting pope. I told you so now you know.. I know you will still reject it but you can't say someone didn't tell youi.
Maybe "dumb blonde" isn’t a stereotype...
Unrelated to this video (but trying to find a more direct way to get in touch is difficult).. Dan...can you please.. PLEASE do some mythbusting of the claims of the dude on the KingdomInContext channel? The dude speaks as if he is an authority, but in such an arrogant way that it makes it clear he's really just a religious bully.
a half human jesus is not the christian christ
It was aliens!
My wife mentioned that she would love a sticker of Think Critically, Google Competently....
If I could add a little advice, believe NOTHING you hear and now days, almost nothing of what you see (it use to be half of what you see) Namaste.
Why yes, yes you have been pranked.
Could have figured that out before applying makeup and nonsense at everyone.
Well, if you're not a natural blond...
🤦🏻♂️
Even if a haploid human, one with a single set of 23 chromosomes, could gestate and survive to birth, this one would have been female as Mary doesn’t have the gene to trigger male development. And, before you say God would have just added in the trigger, then why would He have not given an entire set of 23 chromosomes so he would have a proper complement of 46?
Haha
Let's assume, for a second, that Jesus only had chromosomes from his mom. That would made him a woman. That's how chromosomes work.
Why make this video while applying makeup? (Apart from the false statements being made.) I find that puzzling.
Why is she making a video while putting on makeup? Like, are you going somewhere and thought, “damn it, I HAVE to make this video about a fake religious discovery RIGHT NOW, but I’m late for work.”
Only having 23 chromosomes would be incredibly bad for Jesus' health and have a bunch of weird consequences this creator likely hasn't thought of.
Two of those 46 chromosomes are either an XX pair or an XY pair (barring those rare instances where people have more chromosomes than usual), and if there's only 23 either he's missing some other chromosome so he can fit both X and Y in (which would reeeeaaaally suck for Jesus, as he'd be missing some pretty critical gene content), or he's only got one X chromosome (which according to the kind of people who spread this nonsense around would make Jesus a woman, and also not be great for his health).
Combine that with only having half the chromosome pairs for the other 22, and you'd really want Mary to have no lurking recessive genetic issues.
It'd also mean that God the Father is not male according to the kind of people who reduce gender to genetics.
It'd also mean that genetic testing would make him not the father.
Before MAGA, I would never have thought people with only 23 chromosomes could physically exist.
Her putting on makeup while filming was really annoying.
That’s a super common thing to do, part of the entertainment for some people is watching the process.
I applaud you for using the proper possessive pronoun for the gerund "putting". Very rare to see proper English grammar being written.
Putting on makeup while talking makes her more credible.
Christian tiktockers putting on makeup are so cringe.
Christian tiktockers -putting on makeup- are so cringe
Who says she's even a Christian:???
Christians have been putting out videos debunking Wyatt for years now.
But you like Dan's comic book shirts.
DAN likes low hanging fruit videos to criticize .
The fact that that woman was applying makeup while recording her video tends to undercut her credibility.
Really, who would bother following this woman.!
If I were looking for makeup tips, maybe?
The more religious you are, the more gullible you are, by definition.
You guys never refute claims with scripture or refute the actual facts present you just character assassinate and slander. I seriously don't understand what goes on your minds where you don't look at evidence but just what other people said about the evidence... So frustrating.
what evidence are you offering for your claims? you claim to be a scholar. what are your academic credentials? why should people believe you? All you do is contradict other people's findings. I notice you never claim to be a Christian. are you?
What is it with commentary being done while putting on makeup? They can't be bothered to put on their make-up and _then_ record the video? So they have such little respect for their audience?
Exactly.
TYPICAL ,Mormon, late to the party as Dan's two favorite Christians have already done debunking videos on Wyatt.
Tiktok Critically, Google competently ❤
Better yet - DON'T "tiktok at all"