Yeah, that part makes no sense just like a colonoscopy a twilight zone type those wake up it's over I don't understand why they don't make wholesale shift toward that especially if you know you're gonna have to go to multiple biopsies
Is "tissue separation from surrounding areas like rectum or nerve bundles" possible before cryo❓For example, separate (creating enough space) the cancer from rectum or nerves which responsible erection" using viscoelastics (sodium hyaluranate etc)❓
@@waldipup9010 that could end up being the standard of care, but in the data collecting path at the wrong currently to prove this being a great option, they want the most concrete data they can get it would be nice at some point where they just MRI you if they see nothing no lesions then skip the biopsy
He also says that he makes these videos just because he cares about people. Sure he does and the doctors can probably chime in on that same BS as well. He is really a shill for a barbaric practice.
A 12 point biopsy is a really invasive and potentially harmful procedure. There is a relatively hight risk of infection among other things. I had a biopsy in June and still having side effects.
Nicely done, just the expression on her face when she saw my huge load was totally worth it, I used what I mentioned last month and after the first 3 weeks or so my volume visibly doubled, I went ahead and go'ogled Jan Venstaker's Shooting Ropes and the intensity has been insane!
The incidence of ED and incontinence with focal blazons a reason you doing it, minimizes the risk versus prostatectomy a radiation. Even the best surgeon in the world cannot match the lower percentage of ED and incontinence that vocal ablation offers if it's done right, the standard of care for the last 50 years has been prostatectomy and the mindset was well at least you're alive, they wouldn't even develop vocal Charif. Their goal was not to reduce the side effects. If you look at the date of the side effects are very minimal in comparison, which is surprising by so many men just go get the prostate ripped out of their body with the high risk of recurrent ED and incontinence, the concept obviously is to remove the cancer cause less side effects and so far ablation of any energy source does that
First off Janet , as the BG's said , "Stayin' Alive" is , I'm guessing , one of the few things "more important to men" than sexual function . Second , when discussing Cryo , distinctions need to be made . Full Prostate Cryo is DEFINITELY a choice which will impair sexual function . And when used as a means of Salvage Therapy after failed radiation , it's even worse than "definitely" . However initial Focal Cryo , used when only a spot or two of PC is detected , is an entire different ballgame . Preservation of sexual function is quite high in this case . Focal Cryo for Salvage Therapy not as high , but still in the ballpark . Regarding Salvage Therapy , please note that there are very few means of attempting to eradicate PC after radiation has failed to do so , with many Urologists immediately proclaiming "GET OUT THE HORMONES"! , which helps but is not curative . Cryo Salvage is a means of attempting to eradicate , or greatly diminish , PC after a failed course of radiation , and possibly without concurrent hormones . Given this , to quote Ghostbusters , "Who You Gonna Call"?
My God man, first things first. Why not ask "WHO ARE THE PRIME CANIDATES FOR THIS TREATMENT? I'm listening and waiting to see if this applies to me and a possible treatment. 15 minutes in and nothing about that so far.
I think they mentioned that but prime candidates are patients that: have small, focal lesions, don't want to risk the side effects of prostatectomy/hormone deprivation or not good operative candidates for prostatectomy.
![Prostatectomy [Prostate Removal] for Prostate Cancer with Dr. James Eastham- [ EP-122 ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/a1VWfKF76uY/mqdefault.jpg)
![Prostatectomy [Prostate Removal] for Prostate Cancer with Dr. James Eastham- [ EP-122 ]](/img/tr.png)
Any role for warm water lavage to protect gut during this procedure? Thank you for your work to share this valuable information!
Not that I know of
Excellent explanation! I am seriously considering this treatment. More on who is a good candidate but maybe that’s talked about later in the video.
why not do general anesthesia for all biopsies?
Yeah, that part makes no sense just like a colonoscopy a twilight zone type those wake up it's over I don't understand why they don't make wholesale shift toward that especially if you know you're gonna have to go to multiple biopsies
Is "tissue separation from surrounding areas like rectum or nerve bundles" possible before cryo❓For example, separate (creating enough space) the cancer from rectum or nerves which responsible erection" using viscoelastics (sodium hyaluranate etc)❓
Rezum for prostate cancer, possible ❓
After one freezes a part of their body, sometimes gangrene sets in, possible chance of this?
Haven'tseen that reported , at least significantly.
Why is this guy insisting on followup biopsies when PSMA-PET imaging would provide reliable same information non-invasively?
Dr. Scholz points that out , he suggests MRI before biopsy , and then biopsy only if something shows up .....
@@waldipup9010 that could end up being the standard of care, but in the data collecting path at the wrong currently to prove this being a great option, they want the most concrete data they can get it would be nice at some point where they just MRI you if they see nothing no lesions then skip the biopsy
He also says that he makes these videos just because he cares about people. Sure he does and the doctors can probably chime in on that same BS as well. He is really a shill for a barbaric practice.
I have mine tomorrow in Kearney Nebraska. DR Garrett Pohlman
A 12 point biopsy is a really invasive and potentially harmful procedure. There is a relatively hight risk of infection among other things. I had a biopsy in June and still having side effects.
Nicely done, just the expression on her face when she saw my huge load was totally worth it, I used what I mentioned last month and after the first 3 weeks or so my volume visibly doubled, I went ahead and go'ogled Jan Venstaker's Shooting Ropes and the intensity has been insane!
Focal cryotherapy will cause incontinence and erectile dysfunction? Sexual function is very important for men.
So will removal
The incidence of ED and incontinence with focal blazons a reason you doing it, minimizes the risk versus prostatectomy a radiation. Even the best surgeon in the world cannot match the lower percentage of ED and incontinence that vocal ablation offers if it's done right, the standard of care for the last 50 years has been prostatectomy and the mindset was well at least you're alive, they wouldn't even develop vocal Charif. Their goal was not to reduce the side effects. If you look at the date of the side effects are very minimal in comparison, which is surprising by so many men just go get the prostate ripped out of their body with the high risk of recurrent ED and incontinence, the concept obviously is to remove the cancer cause less side effects and so far ablation of any energy source does that
First off Janet , as the BG's said , "Stayin' Alive" is , I'm guessing , one of the few things "more important to men" than sexual function .
Second , when discussing Cryo , distinctions need to be made .
Full Prostate Cryo is DEFINITELY a choice which will impair sexual function .
And when used as a means of Salvage Therapy after failed radiation , it's even worse than "definitely" .
However initial Focal Cryo , used when only a spot or two of PC is detected , is an entire different ballgame . Preservation of sexual function is quite high in this case .
Focal Cryo for Salvage Therapy not as high , but still in the ballpark .
Regarding Salvage Therapy , please note that there are very few means of attempting to eradicate PC after radiation has failed to do so , with many Urologists immediately proclaiming "GET OUT THE HORMONES"! , which helps but is not curative .
Cryo Salvage is a means of attempting to eradicate , or greatly diminish , PC after a failed course of radiation , and possibly without concurrent hormones .
Given this , to quote Ghostbusters , "Who You Gonna Call"?
I would still eat the steak in case it spreads as other cancers are fed on estrogen and sugar.
What happened to the study of injecting the common cold virus injected into the tumor and your immune fights off the cancer?
It was discarded as it caused too much uncontrollable sneezing .
My God man, first things first. Why not ask "WHO ARE THE PRIME CANIDATES FOR THIS TREATMENT? I'm listening and waiting to see if this applies to me and a possible treatment. 15 minutes in and nothing about that so far.
I think they mentioned that but prime candidates are patients that: have small, focal lesions, don't want to risk the side effects of prostatectomy/hormone deprivation or not good operative candidates for prostatectomy.