I wanna ask a question, "Four were charged with a number of offences, including assaulting police and resisting arrest". Kata including tersebut apakah termasuk ke paratactic?
Bila dilihat dari struktur kalimat dan hubungan antara klausa pertama ("Four were...") dan klausa kedua ("including assaulting..."), maka klausa kedua dengan preposisi "including" termasuk ke dalam jenis hypotactic. Alasannya adalah karena klausa kedua adalah klausa dependen atau anak kalimat yang tidak bisa berdiri sendiri dengan ide sendiri. Klausa kompleks paratactic bisa disamakan dengan kalimat majemuk setara (dua klausa independen atau lebih), sementara klausa hypotactic merupakan kalimat majemuk bertingkat (salah satu ada yang harus jadi induk kalimatnya) Saya harap penjelasannya cukup membantu
Could you make a video about the semantic relations based on Norman Fairclough it same as logico-semantic. But Fairclough make distinction with the logico semantic. Thank you
Hi, sorry for the very late reply. This is an interesting suggestion, and perhaps I will try to do it as semantic relations is also going to be the theory I use for my research. Thanks a lot for the suggestion!
Taxis functions to tell us whether the clause we're analysing belong to a compound or a complex sentence. The logicosemantic tells us how the clause is elaborated. In connection to SFL analysis, CC will help us see how a text is connected (if the text is logical) and the "type" of text (casual/formal, spoken/written). To see a CC example analysis, I recommend reading Suzanne Eggins's book on SFL. Chapter 11 consists of a sample analysis of three different texts on the same topic using all SFL register theory. Hope this helps! Thanks for the question.
Thanks for the question. The clause complexes help to understand the structural organization of a text (this is the systemic part). We can, for instance, see if a text is more formal/casual, written/spoken by comparing the number of sentence and the number of clauses in the text (the functionial part). Commonly, if clause > sentence, the text is more casual and the mode is spoken. For further explanation, I suggest reading Suzanne Eggins' "An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics". Her SFL explanation is simple and there's actually a sample analysis at the end of the book. Good luck :)
thank you sm !!
range of your videos is worth watching
I wanna ask a question, "Four were charged with a number of offences, including assaulting police and resisting arrest". Kata including tersebut apakah termasuk ke paratactic?
Bila dilihat dari struktur kalimat dan hubungan antara klausa pertama ("Four were...") dan klausa kedua ("including assaulting..."), maka klausa kedua dengan preposisi "including" termasuk ke dalam jenis hypotactic. Alasannya adalah karena klausa kedua adalah klausa dependen atau anak kalimat yang tidak bisa berdiri sendiri dengan ide sendiri.
Klausa kompleks paratactic bisa disamakan dengan kalimat majemuk setara (dua klausa independen atau lebih), sementara klausa hypotactic merupakan kalimat majemuk bertingkat (salah satu ada yang harus jadi induk kalimatnya)
Saya harap penjelasannya cukup membantu
Could you make a video about the semantic relations based on Norman Fairclough it same as logico-semantic. But Fairclough make distinction with the logico semantic.
Thank you
Hi, sorry for the very late reply. This is an interesting suggestion, and perhaps I will try to do it as semantic relations is also going to be the theory I use for my research. Thanks a lot for the suggestion!
Sorry maam, i dont understand what about relation taxis and logico semantic in clause complex? Use for what and what the function ?
Taxis functions to tell us whether the clause we're analysing belong to a compound or a complex sentence.
The logicosemantic tells us how the clause is elaborated.
In connection to SFL analysis, CC will help us see how a text is connected (if the text is logical) and the "type" of text (casual/formal, spoken/written). To see a CC example analysis, I recommend reading Suzanne Eggins's book on SFL. Chapter 11 consists of a sample analysis of three different texts on the same topic using all SFL register theory.
Hope this helps! Thanks for the question.
So what is the corelation beetwen Clauses complexes and Systemic Functional Linguistics?
Thanks for the question. The clause complexes help to understand the structural organization of a text (this is the systemic part). We can, for instance, see if a text is more formal/casual, written/spoken by comparing the number of sentence and the number of clauses in the text (the functionial part). Commonly, if clause > sentence, the text is more casual and the mode is spoken. For further explanation, I suggest reading Suzanne Eggins' "An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics". Her SFL explanation is simple and there's actually a sample analysis at the end of the book. Good luck :)
@@AlexJTan Thank you so much ms. May god bless you.
we don't understand Indonesian language